Complete page list

A Content page consists of various content items in a chosen layout

Each created page has a specific layout, like 1 column with and without a header, 2 columns, 3 columns. The chosen layout contains various content areas. In each area you can place 1 or more content items of various kinds like:

  • HTML text;
  • YouTube videos;
  • Google maps;
  • Flickr photos;
  • RSS feeds;
  • Computer Code;
  • the output of another Zikula module.

Within these content areas you can sort the content items by means of drag & drop.
You can make an unlimited number of pages and structure them hierarchical. Your page structure can be displayed in a multi level menu in your website.

This is a second HTML text content item in the left column
Content is an extendible module. You can create your own content plugins and layouts and other Zikula modules can also offer content items. The News published module for instance has a Content plugin for a list of the latest articles.

Add text here ...

»No matter what your needs, Zikula can provide the solution.«

-- Zikula homepage

  1. $this->doAction($var); // just some code

So you see that you can place all kinds of content on the page in your own style and liking. This makes Content a really powerful module.

This page uses the 2 column (62|38) layout which has a header, 2 colums with 62% width on the left and 38% width on the right and a footer

This footer finishes of this introduction page. Good luck with using Content. The Edit Contents interface lets you edit or delete this introduction page. In the administration interface you can further control the Content module.

View full page

The Society for the Study of Evolution was founded in March, 1946. The objectives of the Society for the Study of Evolution are the promotion of the study of organic evolution and the integration of the various fields of science concerned with evolution. The Society publishes the scientific journal Evolution and holds annual meetings in which scientific findings on evolutionary biology are presented and discussed.


View full page

Officers and Council Members
Committees
Publishers Contacts
Business Office
Past Officers


Handbook for SSE Council and Committee Members

Council Nomination FormNominate yourself or someone else for SSE Council. Officer nominations submitted by April 1 will receive full consideration by the nominating committee for that year's election cycle. Nominations for the Editorial Board submitted by July 1 will receive full consideration for that year's nomination cycle. 

Submit Nomination button

 


 

SSE Officers and Council Members: 2024

denotes voting members

President
+
 Anne Charmantier
CEFE -CNRS, UMR 5175
1919 Route de Mende
34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
anne.charmantier [at] cefe.cnrs.fr
president [at] evolutionsociety.org

President-Elect
Carol Boggs
Department of Biological Sciences
University of South Carolina
701 Sumter Street
Columbia, SC 29208
cboggs [at] seoe.sc.edu


   

Past President
+ Kelly Zamudio
College of Natural Sciences
The University of Texas at Austin
2415 Speedway
Austin, TX 78712
kelly.zamudio [at] austin.utexas.edu

Executive Vice-President
Howard Rundle
Department of Biology
University of Ottawa
30 Marie Curie
Ottawa, ON, Canada
K1N 6N5
hrundle [at] uOttawa.ca
execvp [at] evolutionsociety.org

   

Vice-Presidents
Michael Whitlock (North American)
Department of Zoology
The University of British Columbia
4200 - 6270 University Blvd.
Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4
whitlock [at] zoology.ubc.ca

 

+ María del Rosario Castañeda (non-North American)
Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas
Universidad Icesi
Cali 760031, Colombia
mdcastaneda [at] icesi.edu.co


   

Secretary
Sarah Schaack
Biology Department
Reed College
3203 SE Woodstock Blvd.
Portland, OR 97202
schaackmobile [at] gmail.com
secretary [at] evolutionsociety.org

Treasurer
Courtney Murren
Department of Biology
College of Charleston
66 George Street
Charleston, SC 29424
murrenc [at] cofc.edu
treasurer [at] evolutionsociety.org

   

Council – Class of 2024

Regina Baucom
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
University of Michigan
2059 Kraus Natural Sci
830 North University Ave
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
(734) 647-8490
rsbaucom [at] umich.edu

+ Robin Tinghitella
College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Denver
Boettcher Center West
2050 E. Iliff Ave. Denver, CO 80208
(303) 871-3658
robin.tinghitella [at] du.edu
 

Council – Class of 2025

Danielle Edwards
University of California Merced
5200 North Lake Rd.
Merced, CA 95343
(209) 228-2596
dedwards5 [at] ucmerced.edu



Amber Rice

Lehigh University
Iacocca Hall
111 Research Drive, D216
Bethlehem, PA 18015
610-758-5569
amr511 [at] lehigh.edu
Katie Wagner
Berry Center 144
Department of Botany
University of Wyoming
catherine.wagner [at] uwyo.edu

Council – Class of 2026

Nancy Chen
Department of Biology
University of Rochester
P.O. Box 270211
Rochester, NY 14627
nancy.chen [at] rochester.edu

Martha Muñoz
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
Yale University
P.O. Box 208106
New Haven, CT
martha.munoz [at] yale.edu
Rosa Sánchez Guillén
Instituto de Ecología A.C.
Xalapa, Veracruz, México
rosa.sanchez [at] inecol.mx
Editor-in-Chief, Evolution
Jason Wolf
Milner Centre for Evolution
Claverton Down
Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
+44 (0) 1225385012
j.b.wolf [at] bath.ac.uk
 
   

Handling Editor, Evolution 
Tim Connallon
School of Biological Sciences
Monash University
Clayton VIC 3800
Australia
+61 3 9905 0899
tim.connallon [at] monash.edu

Handling Editor, Evolution 
Hélène Morlon
Ecole Normale Supérieure
PSL Research University
Paris, France
helene.morlon [at] bio.ens.psl.eu



   

Editor-in-Chief, Evolution Letters
Judith Mank
Biodiversity Research Centre
University of British Columbia
2212 Main Mall
Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4
(604) 822-1185
mank [at] zoology.ubc.ca

   
Managing Editor, Evolution and Evolution Letters
Melinda Modrell
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales
C/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2
Madrid, Spain 28006
managingeditor [at] evolutionsociety.org
 
   
Social Media & Communications Editor, Evolution Letters
Sarah Davis
Jackson School of Geosciences
The University of Texas at Austin
2305 Speedway Stop C1160
Austin, TX 78712
sdavis6 [at] utexas.edu

Chair, Education & Outreach Committee
Richard Kliman
Department of Biological Sciences
Cedar Crest College
100 College Drive
Allentown, PA 18104-6196
(610) 606-4666, ext 3501
rmkliman [at] cedarcrest.edu
education [at] evolutionsociety.org

Chair, International Committee
María del Rosario Castañeda
Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas
Universidad Icesi
Cali 760031, Colombia
mdcastaneda [at] icesi.edu.co
international [at] evolutionsociety.org

2024 SSE Committee Memberships

* Committee designated in Constitution or Bylaws

To learn more about the role and objectives of each committee, please consult the SSE Handbook for Council and Committee Members.

Nominating Committee
Constitution, Article 5
Catherine Rushworth (Chair)
Jeremy Van Cleve
TBD

Finance Committee
Bylaws, Article 4 
Courtney Murren (Chair)
Howard Rundle
Kim Hughes
Jeremy Beaulieu
Chris Caruso

   

Graduate Student Advisory Committee
+ Susu Cong (Chair)
+ Robert Driver (Past Chair)
Shirley Zhang (Chair-Elect)
Jill Love
María Tocora
Rujuta Vaidya

GSAC [at] evolutionsociety.org
GSAC Webpage

Gould Prize Committee
(Two members of the Education committee and the 3rd year council members)
Leslie Rissler (Chair)
Dale Broder
Regina Baucom
Robin Tinghitella

Gould Prize Webpage

   

Dobzhansky Award Committee
Bylaws, Article 4
Sarah Schaack (Chair)
María del Rosario Castañeda
Michael Whitlock

Dobzhansky Prize Webpage

* SSE Presidents’ Award for Outstanding Dissertation Paper in Evolution Committee
Bylaws, Article 4
Kelly Zamudio (Chair)
Anne Charmantier
Carol Boggs

SSE Presidents’ Award for Outstanding Dissertation Paper in Evolution Webpage

   

GREG R. C. Lewontin Early Award Committee
(2nd year V.P., 1st and 2nd year Councilors, 3 GSAC student members, advisors of previous GREG recipients)
María del Rosario Castañeda (Chair)
Nancy Chen
Martha Muñoz
Rosa Sánchez Guillén
Dan Edwards
Amber Rice
Katie Wagner
3 GSAC student members
Previous advisors of GREG recipients


R. C. Lewontin Early Award Webpage

GREG Rosemary Grant Advanced Award Committee 
(1st-year VP, 3rd-year Councilors, previous Dobzhansky winner, previous SSE Presidents’ Award for Outstanding Dissertation Paper in Evolution winner, 2 past GSAC members/Hamilton finalists/former grantees or early faculty members)
Michael Whitlock (Chair)
Regina Baucom
Robin Tinghitella
Previous Dobhzansky winner
Previous SSE Presidents’ Award winner
Past GSAC/Hamilton finalists/former grantees/early faculty members


Rosemary Grant Advanced Award Webpage

   

Hamilton Award Committee
Katy Heath (senior co-chair)
Catherine Linnen (yr 3, junior co-chair)
Yoel Stuart (year 3)
Rebecca Batstone (year 1)
Seema Sheth (year 1)
Robin Tinghitella (year 1)

Hamilton Award Website

Diverse Careers Committee
Jennifer Spillane (Chair)
TBD

Diverse Careers Committee Website

   

Public Policy Committee
Liz Alter (Chair)
Jenny Boughman
Sally Chang
Flo Debarre (ASN)
Suzanne Edmands
Courtney Fitzpatrick
Katy Heath (ASN)
Amanda Moehring
Leonie Moyle
Sarah Otto
Matthew Rubin

policy [at] evolutionsociety.org
Public Policy Committee Webpage

Diversity Committee
Pamela Yeh (Co-chair)
Laurie Stevison (Co-chair)
Bronwyn Bleakley
Ana Caicedo
Samridhi Chaturvedi
Nancy Chen
Scott Gevaert
Jay Goldberg
Johanna Harvey
Jordan Lewis
Sean Mullen
Marliea Oviedo-Diego
Elizabeth Ostrowski
Martha Burford Reiskind
Carrie Tribble
Xianfa Xie
Kelly Zamudio

diversity [at] evolutionsociety.org
Diversity Committee Webpage

   
Inclusiveness, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA) Award Selection Committee
Andrea Sweigart (SSE, Chair)
Jessica Light (SSB)
Vince Formica (ASN)
Brianna Mims (SSB Student Rep)

IDEA Award Webpage

Evolution Letters Oversight Committee
Jacintha Ellers (ESEB) (Chair)
Aneil Agrawal (SSE)
Andrew McAdam (SSE)
Rhonda Snook (ESEB)
Thomas Flatt (Member-appointed)

SSE Code of Ethics Committee
Amy Angert (Chair)
Chris Caruso
Vince Formica
Isabel Gordo
Mark Rausher

Code of Conduct Committee
Andrea Case (SSE, Chair)
Chris Moore (ASN)
Brian O’Meara (SSB)
Jodie Wiggins (SSE)
Kelly Zamudio (SSB)

Safe Evolution Website

 


 

International Affairs Committee

María del Rosario Castañeda (Chair)
Australia/New Zealand: Henry Arenas-Castro (Australia), Tim Connallon (Australia)
Africa: Conrad Mathee (South Africa)
Asia: Deepa Agashe (India), N.G. Prasad (India), Srijan Seal (India), Suhua Shi (China)
Europe: Arvid Ågren (Sweden), Madlen Prang (Germany), Bibiana Rojas (Austria), Isa-Rita Russo (UK), Vincent Savolainen (UK)
North America: Anne Yoder (USA)
South America: Thales Moreira de Lima (Brazil), Diogo B. Provete (Brazil)

international [at] evolutionsociety.org

International Committee Webpage


 

Joint Meeting Committee
Brian Hollis (Co-chief Meeting Officer)
Alex Wong (Co-chief Meeting Officer)
April Wright (Assistant Meeting Officer)
Mike Wiser (Assistant Meeting Officer, Virtual)
Michael Whitlock (SSE representative)
Tracy Heath (SSB representative)
Mark McPeek (ASN representative)
Howard Rundle (SSE EVP)


Evolution Meeting Website


 

Education & Outreach Committee
Rich Kliman (2014) (Chair)
Gustavo Adolfo Agudelo Cantero (2022)
Maria Jose Albo (2022)
Michael Antolin (2001)
E Dale Broder (2013)
Jay Bundy (2022)
Scott Edwards (2000)
Phil Gibson (2018)
Joseph L. Graves Jr. (2000)
Michael Grillo (2022)
Kathleen Grogan (2022)
Vanessa Koelling (2022)
Louise S. Mead (2008)
Mohamed Noor (2013)
Sam Scheiner (2001) (ASN Representative)
Leslie Rissler (2022)
Barrie Robison (2017)

Contact: Rich Kliman, education [at] evolutionsociety.org

Education and Outreach Webpage

 


Publishers Contacts


 

 

Oxford University Press Journals Author Support Team


   

 


Business and Communications Contacts

SSE Communications
Kati Moore
Department of Biology
Campus Box 90338
Duke University
Durham, NC 27708
communications [at] evolutionsociety.org

 

Executive Director 
Heather Cacanindin
Botanical Society of America & SSE 
4344 Shaw Blvd 
St. Louis, MO 63110
sse-manager [at] evolutionsociety.org

   

Membership & Communications Manager
Amelia Neely
BSA & SSE Business Office
4475 Castleman Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63110
P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166-0299
aneely [at] botany.org


Past Officers

View past officers and editors on this pdf.


View full page

Society Formation

The wide gap that existed in the first third of the 20th century between genetics on one hand, and taxonomy and paleontology on the other, began to narrow down in the 1930's to such an extent that representatives of both groups began to see that there was no fundamental conflict between their views. It was particularly in regard to the study of evolution that an area of understanding and mutual interest developed. Julian Huxley suggested to several participants of the AAAS meeting at Columbus, Ohio, in December, 1939 (Dobzhansky, Epling, and Mayr), that a society be formed including members of the various fields interested in speciation. Dr. Alfred E. Emerson of the University of Chicago undertook to organize an informal Society for the Study of Speciation and issued a number of mimeographed bulletins. Owing to war conditions, this society never became formally organized. Shortly afterwards, a parallel movement started under the initiative of Professor Walter Bucher of Columbia University at whose recommendation the National Research Council established on February 6, 1943, a Committee on Common Problems of Genetics, Paleontology and Systematics. This committee held two discussion meetings in the summer of 1943, one of a group consisting primarily of botanists at Berkeley (University of California) on June 14-16, and the other one consisting primarily of animal paleontologists and geneticists at the American Museum History in New York on July 24-25. Since further such meetings were impossible owing to wartime travel difficulties, it was decided to continue an exchange of ideas among members of the Committee through correspondence. Copies of these letters were gathered and issued in mimeographed bulletins under the editorship of Dr. Ernst Mayr. Six such bulletins were issued, four of which contained a discussion of numerous evolutionary problems.

The work of the Committee revealed that such a keen interest in the problems of evolution that it was felt that a larger and more permanent organization was needed than a temporary Committee of the National Research Council. This was particularly true in view of the obvious need for a journal that would include evolutionary studies from the diverse fields of biology and thus help to bridge the gaps between them. Informal correspondence between Professor Dobzhansky, Dr. Simpson, Dr. Mayr, and other members of the Committee, revealed much enthusiasm for such a journal, as well as for a society that would support it. Dr. Emerson suggested that the dormant Society for the Study of Speciation should join forces with the National Research Council group in the establishment of a Society for the Study of Evolution. An organization meeting was held in St. Louis on March 30, 1946, at which Dr. Emerson presided. At this meeting, attended by fifty-seven biologists, the Society for the Study of Evolution was officially founded, a tentative policy adopted, and a slate of officers elected. The officers of the first year were the following:

President: G. G. Simpson
Vice Presidents: E. B. Babcock, A. E. Emerson, and J. T. Patterson
Secretary: E. Mayr
Treasurer: K. P. Schmidt
Council: E. R. Dunn, H. J. Muller, Sewall Wright, G. L. Jepsen, Th. Dobzhansky, and R. Chaney

Over 500 members joined the Society during the first year of its existence, and on the occasion of the First Annual Meeting in Boston, December 28-31, 1946, the Society felt sufficiently well established to authorize publication of a research journal in the field of evolution. In a wave of enthusiasm and optimism the Council voted to publish 1500 copies of the Journal. Thanks to this decision the Society lived for years on the sale of back copies. A grant had been awarded to the Society by the American Philosophical Society to make this publication possible. At this same meeting, a constitution was also adopted by the Society.

Despite considerable interest in assuming control of the American Naturalist the Society decided to found a new journal. Some of the older members wanted the word "Organic" included in the Journal title but in the final vote the title "Evolution" won out, not only for its simplicity but also because it corresponded to Ecology and Genetics. Several long defunct journals had that same name and efforts to avoid legal difficulties included leters to the former publishers all of which were returned for a "better address". During the fall of 1946 six firms were invited to submit bids for the printing. All but Lancaster Press declined to submit a serious bid because of the post war printing backlog and the great paper shortage. Additionally there was a shortage of suitable manuscripts and at least one paper was written just to fill an issue. There was strong support from the very beginning to have the journal as international as possible. Indeed the editorial board included distinguished evolutionists from abroad.

Following policies established during its first year of existence, the function of the Society is to promote the study of organic evolution in all its aspects. The Society is a common meeting ground for representatives of all fields of science concerned with organic evolution, including genetics, paleontology (vertebrate, invertebrate, plant), taxonomy (animal, plant), ecology, anthropology, and others. The journal EVOLUTION is established in order to stimulate evolutionary research and to bring its results together in readily accessible form. A journal broadly devoted to the particular subject of evolution will help to counteract the previous extreme scattering of pertinent literature, which has handicapped evolutionary study by the tendency to confine results within numerous different narrowly specialized groups. The journal will not publish taxonomic monographs or other descriptive studies properly addressed to a more specialized audience, but it will encourage the expression of the evolutionary significance of such material and will make this available to the broader group of students of evolution in general. Research primarily directed toward various evolutionary problems will also be encouraged.

The aims of the Society, through its journal and otherwise reflect the conviction that the evolutionary approach will clarify many unsolved biological problems and will provide common goals and mutual comprehension among all the life sciences.

E. Mayr

 

Read more

Read more about the founding of the Society for the Study of Evolution:

"Disciplining Evolutionary Biology: Ernst Mayr and the Founding of the Society for the Study of Evolution and Evolution (1939–1950)" by Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis

"Organizing evolution: Founding the society for the study of evolution (1939–1950)" by Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis

 

 

SSE Elected Representatives 1988-2023

View past elected representatives on this pdf.


View full page

CONSTITUTION OF SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF EVOLUTION, INC.

Adopted December 29, 1946, Boston; Revised December 29, 1947; December 27, 1949; October 15, 1953; April 8, 1955; September 2, 1958; November 27, 1959; April 28, December 29, 1960; August 1, 1961; August 19, 1965; June 20, October 1, 1968; June 21, 1985; January 1, 1986; January 1, 1991; January 1, 1992; June 20, 1998; June 23, 1999; January 1, 2000; June 23, 2006; March 1, 2007; February 15, 2009; June 12, 2009; July 7, 2016; January 1, 2018; January 1, 2020; September 29, 2020; December 11, 2020; May 9, 2022; November 22, 2022; January 1, 2024

CONSTITUTION

Article 1. The organization shall be called "Society for the Study of Evolution, Inc" and referred to as the “Society.”

Article 2. The object of the Society shall be the promotion of the study of biological  evolution and the integration of various fields of science concerned with evolution.

Article 3. The Society has voting Members with rights and privileges as specified in the Bylaws. 

Article 4. The officers of the Society shall include President, President-Elect, Past President, Executive Vice-President, two Vice-Presidents, Secretary, Treasurer, and Editor-in-Chief of the journal Evolution. Officers and offices shall be elected or appointed according to the Bylaws for the Society.

Article 5. Governance and management of the Society shall be vested in a board of directors known as the “Council.”

Article 6. The time and place of the annual meeting of the Society shall be determined by the Council.

Article 7. Amendments to the Constitution may be proposed in writing by any member to the Secretary, who shall submit them to the Council for consideration and vote. Such proposed amendments as have been approved by the Council shall be submitted to the members for a vote and may be adopted by a favorable vote of the majority of the members voting. 

Article 8. The fiscal year, tax year of the corporation, and terms of office are January 1 to December 31 unless otherwise specified in the Bylaws.

Article 9. The Society shall have no capital stock. No member shall be entitled to receive as dividends, profits, or otherwise, any property or money derived from the operation of said Society, but all property earnings and income of the Society, after the payment of necessary charges and expenses of operations, shall be used exclusively to carry out the scientific and educational purposes of the Society as expressed in Article 2 of the Constitution.

Article 10. SSE solicits and accepts gifts for purposes that will help the organization further and fulfill its mission. SSE will not accept gifts that (a) would result in the society violating its corporate charter, (b) would result in the society losing its status as an IRC § 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization, (c) are too difficult or too expensive to administer in relation to their value, (d) would result in any unacceptable consequences for SSE, or (e) are for purposes outside SSE’s mission. Decisions on the restrictive nature of a gift, and its acceptance or refusal, shall be made by the Council.

 
BYLAWS 

ARTICLE I. PURPOSE  

Section 1. Purpose. The purposes of the Society for the Study of Evolution, Inc. (the “Society” hereafter) are exclusively those allowed for organizations defined under §501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. Within these limits, the purposes of the Society include the promotion of the study of organic evolution and the integration of the various fields of science concerned with evolution.

Section 2. Vision. The Society aspires to advance knowledge of evolutionary biology for the benefit of science and society and to cultivate and support a global community of evolutionary biologists.
 
Section 3. Mission. The Society promotes evolutionary biology research, education, application, outreach, and community building in an equitable and globally inclusive manner.

ARTICLE II. MEMBERS

Section 1. Membership. Any person who is interested in the study of evolution, who supports the purpose and mission of the Society, and who upholds the Society's values, is eligible for membership. 

Section 2. Member Categories. The Council may, by resolution, establish, eliminate, or define categories of membership. All categories of membership include electronic access to the journal of the Society (Evolution), the right to vote in Society elections, and all other privileges of membership. Membership categories may include: Student, Postdoc, K–12 Educator, Emeritus, Family, Regular, and Life. Members may belong to more than one category. 

Section 3. Powers and Purpose of Members. Members have the power to vote for Society Council members and Officers. Members do not have the power to make or approve the Society budget or take actions reserved for the Council or Officers. Members attend the Annual Meeting and the Annual Business Meeting. Some membership categories may have special or exclusive membership rights. The purpose of the Membership is to participate in Society-sponsored activities and opportunities, engage as an academic community, and participate in elections.

Section 4. Selection of Members. Membership shall be automatically approved following a determination that the applicant has paid any required dues, agrees to uphold the Society's Code of Ethics, and satisfies any other qualifications required for membership. 

Section 5.  Records of Members. The Secretary shall ensure that the Society maintains a current and formal record of the names, contact information, and status of Members.

Section 6. Conduct of Members. The Council may define general or specific standards of professional and personal conduct that all Members or other participants are expected to respect, honor, and model, when involved in Society meetings, business, initiatives, or any other activity. These standards shall include a Society Code of Ethics and a Meetings Code of Conduct, together with such enforcement policies as deemed appropriate.

Section 7. Suspension or Removal of Members. A Member may be suspended or expelled from the Society for serious misconduct that adversely affects the interests or reputation of the Society, violations of the Society Code of Ethics, or for any other reason. Suspended Members may be reinstated through an application to the Ethics Review Committee that satisfactorily explains reasons for reinstatement.

Section 8. Resignation of Members. Any member may resign at any time by sending or delivering a written resignation to the Secretary. Prorated dues may not be refunded.

Section 9. Dues. Annual dues shall be determined by the Council and will include a subscription to the journal Evolution. Payment shall be due January 1. Members who have not paid their dues by January 1 shall be dropped from the rolls. The dues for Life membership shall be twenty (20) times the Regular membership rate.

ARTICLE III. COUNCIL

Section 1. Council Members and Purpose. The Council (a “board of directors” in operation, responsibility, and authority) shall be the managing and governing body of the Society. The Council shall determine matters of publication policy, formulate and modify program rules, fill temporary vacancies among officers, appoint Editors and Associate Editors of Evolution, set and approve the annual budget, review expenditures, and conduct other business as required.

Section 2. Qualifications of Council Members and Composition of the Council. Nominees for positions on the Council must have demonstrated a commitment to the mission and purposes of the Society and a commitment to uphold the Society's Code of Ethics. There shall be two classifications of Council Member (also known as “Councilor”): Member-Elected Councilor and Council-Appointed Councilor. No individual shall simultaneously hold two Member-Elected positions on Council. In the event that a sitting elected Council Member is elected to a second position, their prior position will be considered vacant. Member-Elected Councilors shall be eligible for re-election one year after vacating their previous position. 

Section 3. Number of Voting Council Members. The voting members of Council shall consist of the Officers (Article IV), up to nine (9) at-large Member-Elected Councilors, and two (2) Council-Appointed Councilors represented by the Chair and Past-Chair of the SSE Graduate Student Advisory Committee (GSAC). 

Section 4. Terms. At-large Member-Elected Councilors serve three-year terms. Councilors assume office on January 1. Unless they resign or are removed from office, the Council may authorize Councilors to remain in office until their successors are properly elected, designated, or appointed, for up to a maximum period of one term. Member-Elected Councilor terms are staggered such that a maximum of three Councilors are on the Members’ annual ballot.

Section 5. Selection of Voting Council Members. Society Members elect the at-large Councilors and Officers (Art. IV). Elections are held annually and include Officer or Member-Elected Councilor seats due to become vacant at the end of the calendar year. Election slates are developed by the Nominating Committee (Art. VI) and approved by the Council. All members in good standing at the time of the issuing of ballots shall be eligible to vote. In the event that an election for Councilor results in a tie for winner, the three Presidents presiding before the election (President, President-Elect, Past-President) shall decide upon the outcome between the two top vote-getters by majority vote. The Council annually appoints the GSAC Chair-Elect as a Non-voting Advisor and as the successor to the current GSAC Chair. 

Section 6. Removal of Council Members. Any Member-Elected Councilor may be removed with or without cause by a Society Members’ vote or by the Council on the recommendation of the Ethics Review Committee. Proper notice of a Society Members’ vote must be given in advance, as required for an annual membership meeting, or for a regular meeting of the voting members, or as required for a special meeting of the voting members, whichever is appropriate, stating that the removal of a Councilor is to be considered. The Council may remove any Councilor appointed by the Council. When a Councilor is removed, any Society office held by that Councilor is immediately vacated.

Section 7. Resignation of Voting Council Members. A Voting Council Member may resign at any time. The resignation of a Councilor must be in writing and be delivered to the Council, a President, or the Secretary. Once delivered, a notice of resignation is irrevocable. When a Councilor resigns, any Society office held by that Councilor is immediately vacated.

Section 8. Filling Vacancies on Voting Council. In the event of a vacancy on Council that will have a duration of more than one year, the Nominating Committee may be charged with nominating one or two candidates to fill the vacant position and serve as interim for the remainder of the term. This interim appointment will then be made by majority vote of Council and will begin immediately following the appointment. For vacancies that will have a duration of less than one year, the position on Council may remain vacant if so agreed by majority vote of the Council.

Section 9Quorum for Conducting Council Business. At all meetings of the Council, the presence or participation by phone or other conference communication forum, of a quorum, which is at least two thirds of the number of voting Council members (which does not include Non-Voting Advisors) in office immediately before the meeting begins, is necessary to allow the transaction of corporate business or the making of corporate decisions. Non-Voting Advisors do not count toward the number needed for a quorum nor are they counted in the quorum. 

Section 10. Decision-Making and Voting by Council. The Council must diligently and conscientiously attempt to make decisions by consensus. They must employ all standard consensus practices and techniques including the expression and careful consideration of minority views. Consensus decisions must be recorded in the written minutes. When a consensus apparently cannot be achieved, any Councilor may request and require that a vote be taken. 

Decisions that are not obtained by consensus require a clearly stated motion by a Voting Councilor (a Member-Elected Councilor or a Council-Appointed Councilor), a second by a Voting Councilor, and a vote by the Voting Councilors that must be recorded in the written minutes. Each member of the Voting Council will have one vote. At the request of any Voting Councilor, the names will be recorded in the minutes of each Councilor who voted for, voted against, or abstained on a particular motion. Non-Voting Advisors may participate in discussion, but do not make motions, second, or vote on any Council motions. 

The three Presidents break ties when they arise in any Council vote, reaching a decision through discussion amongst themselves and a vote, if necessary. Ties in these Presidential votes withdraws the motion.

Section 11. Proxy Voting. Proxy voting is not allowed at any meeting of the Council or as part of reaching any decision of the Council.

Section 12. Telephonic and Video Meetings. Realtime meetings may be held by telephone, video teleconference, or other distance method, so long as all participating Councilors may simultaneously hear and speak with each other. A Councilor participating in such a meeting is deemed present for purposes of a quorum.  

Section 13. Decisions Without Meetings. The Voting Council may make any decision or take any action within its power without a meeting through a written resolution that sets forth the action so taken. The resolution is effective when a majority of the voting Councilors have voted in the affirmative. The resolution may be sent or transmitted by any medium in which a written record of the resolution, its recipients and their votes is retained. 

Section 14. Voting Council Meetings. The Voting Council must meet at least two times per year, and shall strive to do this by meeting at least once every six months or so. One of these meetings should take place during the annual membership meeting. Only Voting Council Members, Non-voting Advisors, and others invited by the President may attend Council meetings. The President chairs Council meetings. Council meeting minutes are not published and are only open to current and future Councilors. A President-approved summary of Council decisions may be published following the meeting.

Section 15. Notice of Council Meetings. Notice must be given to every Councilor of every meeting of the Council, stating the date, time, and location (physical or electronic) of the meeting, and the purpose of the meeting if so required by law or these Bylaws. The notice must be given not less than seven days in advance of the meeting and can be delivered by telephone, in person, mail, email, text, fax or any other acknowledged contact provided by the Councilor.

After the initial notice is given of the schedule for a single or series of regular Council meetings, which will occur at a fixed time and place (physical or electronic), no further separate notice is required for each of those meetings. The Council may, by resolution, establish or change the dates of regularly scheduled Council meetings, with proper notice given to all Councilors.

Section 16. Waiver of Notice. Any Councilor may waive the right to receive full advance notice of any meeting. Waivers of notice must be in writing, signed by the person entitled to notice, and must be given to the Secretary to be placed in the corporate records. Waivers may be signed before or after the meeting has taken place. The attendance of a Councilor at any meeting without specific objection to the notice constitutes a waiver of the full notice of that meeting.

Section 17.  Authority of Council Members. No Councilor, Officer, staff member, or representative may communicate or act on behalf of the Society without specific or general authorization by the Council.

Section 18. Conduct of Council Members. Councilors must discharge their duty of loyalty and their duty of diligence in good faith with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a similar position would exercise under similar circumstances and in a manner the Councilor reasonably believes to be in the best interest of the Society. Councilors are also subject to the same personal and professional conduct expectations and directives as Members. Content of any Council discussion should not be shared outside the Council without permission. 

ARTICLE IV. OFFICERS AND OTHER OFFICES

Section 1. Officers. Officers are members of the Council and hold a Member-Elected Councilor or Council-Appointed Councilor seat. The Officers are Members of the Society and must carry out policies and decisions as directed by the Council. The Officers include President, President-Elect, Retiring Past-President, Executive Vice-President, North American Vice-President, Non-North American Vice-President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Editor-in-Chief of Evolution. The same person may not hold more than one office simultaneously. 

Section 2. Other Offices. Other appointed offices of the Society may carry out duties as directed by the Council. Other offices may include Committee Chairs, Non-Voting Advisors, staff, or contractors. Other office assignments are made by the Council and serve at the pleasure of the Council. The Council may determine definition and specification for any office, including term, Society privileges, and Council meeting participation.

Section 3. Terms. Council Officer terms are three (3) years except for President-Elect, President, Past-President, all of which have one (1) year terms and the North American and Non-North American Vice-Presidents, both of which have staggered two (2) year terms. Official terms shall commence on 1 January of the year following the election, except that the term of the Editor-in-Chief for Evolution shall commence at the next Annual Meeting of the Council following their selection. The President-Elect shall be elected annually, and shall automatically become the President for the next year; similarly, the President automatically becomes the Past-President in the year following their term. The North American and Non-North American Vice-Presidents shall be elected biennially and are eligible for the same office one year after the expiration of their previous term. The Executive Vice-President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Editor-in-Chief shall be elected for terms of three (3) years and may be re-elected. Terms for Executive Vice-President, Secretary, and Treasurer are staggered such that no two are elected in the same year. 

Section 4. Selection. As they are a class of Councilors, Officers are elected in the annual Councilor election per Article III Section 5. 

The Council may create and fill any other office (see Article IV Section 2). But nomination of the candidate for the position of Editor-in-Chief of Evolution is the responsibility of a special-purpose ad hoc committee consisting of the President plus one member of the Evolution Editorial Board and one member of the Council (both appointed by the President). The Editor-in-Chief of Evolution shall be elected by the Council by secret ballot prior to January 1 of the year of editorial transition.

Section 5. Officer Vacancies and Rules of Succession. If any office (except President) of the Society becomes vacant by death, resignation, retirement, removal, disqualification, or any other cause, see Article III Section 8. 

If the office of President becomes vacant, the position shall be filled by the President-Elect, who shall serve as President for the remainder of the current term and the following term as Past-President. If no President-Elect is available to fill a vacant President’s office, Council must appoint one within thirty (30) days of the Presidential vacancy.

If the office of Editor-in-Chief of Evolution is vacant, the three Presidents (past, acting, and president-elect) shall appoint an acting Editor-in-Chief until a successor is chosen according to Article IV Section 4. 

Section 6. Officer and Other Office Duties.

President – The president is the principal officer of the organization and will, in general, supervise or oversee the supervision of all of the affairs of the organization.  The president generally will preside at all meetings of the Council, unless the Council selects another person to preside. The president will also perform other duties as may be assigned by the Council.  The president may serve as an ex-officio member of any committee. The President shall preside at scientific sessions, at the business and Council meetings, and shall appoint such committees as directed by the Council or prescribed by the Constitution and Bylaws. It shall be the privilege of the President to plan and arrange one symposium to be held at the annual meeting of the Society. The President also assists the Executive Vice-President and the Council in planning other symposia, including those to be co-sponsored by the Society in collaboration with other societies. The President cooperates with the President-Elect and Past-President in leading the Council and Society planning. The President appoints one new member of the three-member Nominating Committee each year. The President appoints members of the Education and Outreach Committee, Hamilton Award Committee, Diversity Committee, Public Policy Committee, and Finance Committee.

President-Elect – Cooperates with the other two “presidents” in leading the Council and Society planning. In the absence of the President or in the event of the President's inability to act, the President-Elect will perform the duties of the President. The President-Elect, when acting as President, will have all the powers of and is subject to all the restrictions on the President. Appoints members to the Ethics Review Committee, with approval of the Council.

Past-President - Cooperates with other two “presidents” in leading the Council and Society planning. Chairs the Presidents’ Award committee, which, when formulated, consists of the President, Past-President and President-Elect. Serves as chair of the Ethics Review Committee. 

Executive Vice-President - The Executive Vice-President, in consultation with the President, shall be responsible for the administration, management and operation of the Society in accordance with the existing constitution, bylaws and policies. Is responsible for oversight of all business operations, financial management, publishing contracts, and general Society and conference activities. Nominates the next Executive Vice-President. Works with the Joint Meeting Committee in Annual Meeting Planning. Acts as signatory on meeting contracts. Assures that all contracts are approved by the Society’s legal advisor prior to signing. Oversees the Society’s financial books. Shall seek Council approval for expenditures above a Council-defined amount. Shall make a report to the Council at each Annual Meeting of the financials of the preceding fiscal year, an informal interim report for the current fiscal year, and a report of other programs and activities. 

The Executive Vice-President, in conjunction with the Chief Meeting Organizer, shall conduct negotiations for sites for the annual meeting, appoint local committees, and distribute announcements of the meeting to members. The Executive Vice-President is authorized to contract clerical and accounting assistance when necessary.

The Executive Vice-President may receive a stipend during their term in office.

North American Vice-President - May be assigned a variety of tasks by the Council, often associated with award committee oversight. Representative to the Joint Meeting Committee.

Non-North American Vice-President - May be assigned a variety of tasks by the Council, often associated with award committee oversight. Chair of the International Committee.

Secretary - The Secretary will perform or oversee the performance of the following duties: a) record and keep the minutes of the meetings of the members and of the Council and of any committees; b) see that all notices are duly given in accordance with the provisions of these Bylaws or as required by law; c) be custodian of the corporate records; d) keep a register of the mailing address of each Member as provided by such Member; e) ensure that all required state and federal reports are prepared and filed in a timely fashion; and f) perform or oversee all duties incident to the office of Secretary and such other duties as from time to time may be assigned by the President or by the Council. The secretary may delegate some or all of these tasks but remains responsible for their proper completion.

The Secretary is responsible for communications within the Society, and manages all Society elections and ballots. At least 30-days before any election the Secretary shall send to members the official election slate and any other ballot initiatives. The Secretary shall tabulate the votes, report to the Council, and transmit names of elected officers to the editor of the Journal for publication. The Secretary shall communicate expectations and documents to all entering Council members and committee chairs.The Secretary shall inform committee members that they have been asked to serve on a Standing Committee or a Nominating Committee. Following the nomination of an Editor-in-Chief by the editor’s special nominating committee, the Secretary shall call for a secret ballot of the Council to elect the Editor-in-Chief. The Secretary is authorized to contract for clerical assistance when necessary with approval of the Executive Vice-President. 

The Secretary is responsible for ensuring required reports are supplied to Council members before meetings. 

The Secretary may receive a stipend during their term in office.

Treasurer - The Treasurer will perform or oversee the performance of the following duties: a) be responsible for the proper management and control of all funds of the Society; b) prepare full and accurate financial records on a timely basis of all the income, expenses and assets of the Society; c) present reports at every Council meeting on the financial affairs of the Society; d) provide financial information necessary to prepare and file the required reports to state and federal government agencies, showing the income, disbursements, and assets of the Society; and coordinate with the secretary to prepare a register of current voting Members. The Treasurer may delegate some or all of these tasks but remains responsible for their proper completion.

In consultation with the Executive Vice-President, the Treasurer shall manage the society budget and coordinate payments of invoices, grants, prizes, fees and reimbursements. The Treasurer shall provide a report to the Council one week prior to the annual meeting summarizing the current status of the Society's financial activities. The Treasurer is authorized to contract clerical and accounting assistance when necessary with the permission of the Executive Vice-President. The Treasurer shall submit in advance and present a report on the status of society business at the Annual Meeting.

The Treasurer is Chair of the Finance Committee.

The Treasurer may receive a stipend during their term in office.

Editor-in-Chief - The Editor shall be responsible for the editing and publishing of the Journal of Evolution and for the care of the reserve stock of the publications of the Society. 

The Editor-in-Chief may receive a stipend during their term in office.

Committee Chairs – Committee Chair fill committee seats unless that right is assigned elsewhere. Chairs must act in good faith to execute the committee charge. They report quarterly to the Council

Non-Voting Advisors – Participate in Council meetings. Non-Voting Advisors may serve on committees and be assigned other duties by the Council. Non-Voting Advisors are not counted in Council quorum and do not participate in Council votes.

ARTICLE V. MEMBER MEETINGS AND VOTING

Section 1.  Annual Membership Meeting. There must be an annual meeting of the Members (a.k.a. the business meeting). It will be held at a time and location determined by resolution of the Council. Annual Meetings may be virtual.

Written notice of the Annual Meeting must be sent by mail, e-mail, or other familiar method, to all Members, at the physical and electronic address provided by the Member or as it appears in the Society records, at least thirty (30) days in advance of the meeting. 

At the annual meeting, Members will hear and consider reports from the Council, officers and staff concerning the activities, management and budget of the Society. Members may then vote on any matters for which proper notice was given. The failure to hold an Annual Meeting does not affect the validity of any Society action.

Section 2. Other Membership Meetings. Special meetings may be called by the President with the approval of the Council. 

Section 3. Content of Notice. A single notice sent to the address provided by the Member, at least thirty (30) days in advance of the beginning of a meeting will be sufficient and no further notice is required so long as the meeting date and time which were announced do not change.The notice must contain the date, time, location and, when required, the purpose of the meeting. Notices of special meetings always require a statement of the purpose(s) for which the meeting is called.

Section 4. Waiver of Notice. Any member may waive the right to receive full advance notice of any meeting. Waivers of notice will be in writing, signed by the person entitled to notice, and will be given to the Secretary to be placed in the Society records. Waivers may be signed before or after the meeting has taken place. The attendance of a Member at any meeting without specific objection to improper notice will constitute a waiver of the full notice of that meeting.

Section 5. Record Date. The record date for determining the members entitled to receive notice of a meeting will be the day before the day on which the notice is sent. The record date to determine the members entitled to vote at a member’s meeting will be the date of the meeting.

Section 6. Quorum for Membership Meetings.  A quorum will consist of the presence, participation by conference call, or voting by mail, or email, where that is allowed, of at least 10% percent of the Members. 

Section 7.  Decision-Making by Members. The affirmative vote of at least a majority of the Members present at or participating by conference call, mail or e-mail in a properly called meeting, for which a quorum has been achieved, is necessary and sufficient to make decisions or pass resolutions by the Members, unless a greater proportion is required by law, the Constitution or Bylaws. All decisions require a clearly stated motion, a second, and a vote. All motions, which are successfully adopted, must be recorded in the written minutes.

Section 8. Proxy Voting.  Proxy voting will not be allowed at any meeting of the Members or as part of reaching any decision by the Members. 

Section 9. Voting by Mail, Fax or Email. Unless prohibited or limited by the Constitution or Bylaws, any action which may be taken at any annual, regular or special meeting of the Members may be taken without a meeting if the Society delivers a written (electronic or physical) ballot to every member entitled to vote on the matter, by mail or e-mail, at the address provided by the Member. The written ballot will:  a) set forth each nominee or proposed action; and b) provide an opportunity to vote for each vacant position, and for or against each proposed action. Approval by written ballot will be valid only when the number of votes cast by ballot equals or exceeds any quorum required to be present at a meeting authorizing the action.  The vote is limited to the subject specified on the ballot. 

Section 10. Unless otherwise stated, all decisions shall be by majority vote of those voting, assuming that a quorum is present.

Article VI. COMMITTEES

Section 1. Establishment of Committees. The Council may establish any committee, including Council Committees, Standing Committees, Temporary Committees, or Ad Hoc Committees, by a resolution. Such resolutions must name the committee and the purpose of the committee, must state whether it is a Council committee, an organizational standing committee, or an ad hoc committee, and must state what powers, authority and duties have been delegated to the committee, how the chair of the committee and how the members of the committee will be appointed or elected, and may state what procedures, if any, the committee will use in carrying out its work. Other committees shall be appointed by the President at the authorization of the Council, as the occasion arises.

Section 2. Committee Definitions. Council Committees must consist of two or more Councilors, and must not have any members who are not members of the Council. Standing Committees must consist of at least one Council member and can be populated by Society members and nonmembers. Temporary Committees are populated as Standing Committees and have a maximum existence duration. Ad Hoc Committees are populated by Society members and may include nonmembers. No committee can consist of fewer than two members.

Section 3. Committee Chairs and Terms. Committee chairs are appointed by the Executive Committee. Committee chairs typically serve three (3) year terms.

Section 4. Committee Procedures. All committees submit oral or written reports to the Council twice annually. All committees must follow Society procedures for meetings and activities as defined in these Bylaws. Committees will record minutes of all meetings and file them with the Secretary.

Section 5. Council Committees. The Council may establish Council Committees to which are delegated part of the power of the whole Council to authorize expenditures and draft budgets, policies and programs to be approved by the full Council. Such committees must be established by the affirmative vote of a majority of all Counselors then in Council. Unless otherwise specified, Council Committee meetings will operate with the same quorum and voting requirements as the full board, and will operate according to the procedures of the board as stated in these Bylaws. If any formal decisions or resolutions are voted on at a committee meeting, then the votes and the resolutions so adopted must be recorded in the form of corporate minutes and filed with the Secretary. 

Section 6. Executive Council / Committee. Together, the three “presidents,” as well as the Secretary and Executive VP, form the Executive Council. The Executive Council operates as a Council Committee and has the power to make decisions between Council meetings, including financial and budgetary decisions. The Executive Council must comply with the provisions of the Bylaws concerning the full Council as far as those are reasonably applicable to the Executive Council. All Executive Council decisions must be recorded in official minutes, which will be submitted to the full Council. The Executive Council must make reasonable efforts to inform all Council members of the issues to be dealt with at an Executive Council meeting.

Section 7. Finance Committee. The Finance Committee (a Standing Committee) shall consist of the Treasurer, Executive Vice-President, the past Treasurer, and two additional members of the Society elected for two (2) year terms. The additional members shall be nominated by the President and elected by the Council at the annual meeting of the Society. Proposed major changes in expenditures and/or income should be reviewed by the Finance Committee, following which the committee will make specific recommendations to the Council for its approval.

Section 8. Nominating Committee. The President shall appoint a Nominating Committee (an ad hoc Committee) not less than six months before the election. The Committee shall consist of three members, one appointed each year for a three year term. 

The Nominating Committee shall be chaired by the senior member. It shall be the duty of the Committee, after receiving from the membership proposals for nominations for each office (including vacancies on the Council), to nominate two candidates for each office, except for the offices of Executive Vice-President, Treasurer, and Secretary, for each of which a single nomination shall be made. In selecting candidates, due consideration shall be given to representation of the various fields of interest to the Society. The committee shall transmit its nominations to the Secretary at least three months before the election for Council consideration and approval.

Section 9. Ethics Review Committee and Adjudication Committee. The Ethics Review Committee and Adjudication Committee enforce the Society’s Code of Ethics according to approved procedures. The Ethics Review Committee shall consist of the Past-President (chair) and four Members in good standing appointed by the President-Elect with approval of the Council. The four members will serve for three years each until their successors assume. Successor members will be appointed by the Ethics Review Committee chair or the President-Elect with approval of the Council. As needed, an Adjudication Committee will comprise the Chair and two members of the Ethics Review Committee selected by the Chair after considering any disclosed conflicts of interest.

Section 10. Limitations on Powers. The Council must always have the power to amend, alter, or repeal the decisions of its committees, subject to limitations on the unilateral amending of contracts, interference with third-party rights, and other legal limitations. The Council may dissolve any committee, including temporarily dissolving the Executive Committee. The Council determines at the outset of any committee, and at any intervening time, any committee's authority to make budgets, spend or allocate Society funds, make decisions for the Society, or develop policy.  

ARTICLE VII. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Section 1. Non Discrimination.  In the delivery of its services, the Society strives to serve all persons fairly independent of their ethnicity, nationality, place of origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, familial status, economic status, age, mental or physical ability, or any other recognized category of personal identity.

Section 2. Annual Financial Review. The Council must require the performance of an internal annual financial review which must involve the services of a trusted person with bookkeeping or accounting skills and knowledge, and which does not rely upon the services of the person who does the financial bookkeeping for the organization, or the person(s) who sign the checks for the organization. This financial review need not be formal, but must at least review and reconcile the checkbook entries, bank statements, deposit slips, receipts and expense documentation. The Council may authorize a full formal audit as necessary.

Section 3. Compensation of Officers, Councilors and other Appointees. Unless specifically defined in these bylaws, no Officer or member of the Council will receive any compensation for fulfilling the responsibilities of a member of the Council or of an Officer as defined in these bylaws. However, the Society may pay compensation to Officers and members of the Council for other services performed as employees or independent contractors as long as the required rules for conflicts of interest are followed. Council members and their relatives who receive regular compensation from the Society must always constitute less than a majority of the Council. Officers and members of the Council may receive reimbursement for actual expenses incurred in the course of fulfilling their responsibilities.

Section 4.  Conflict of Interest. A conflict of interest is always present whenever the Society awards compensation or provides any tangible benefits to an Officer or member of the Council or to a member of a Councilor’s or Officer’s family or dependents. A conflict can also exist when the Society takes an action that results in an indirect benefit to an Officer or Councilor. Conflicts of interest must be disclosed to the Council by the person in conflict as soon as they are aware of them. The Council may then decide to allow the conflict or approve an alternative action that avoids the conflict, or mitigates it. Councilors or Officers for whom a conflict exists must recuse themselves from voting on the matter (a recuser is not counted in the quorum).  The Council must analyze the conflict in sufficient detail to ensure that the management of the conflict of interest is fair to the Society.

All Councilors and Officers must sign a disclosure of all conflicts of interest annually, and update it if that disclosure needs to be changed.

Section 5. Termination of the Corporation (Society). In the event of dissolution or termination of the Society, title to and possession of all the property of the Society shall pass forthwith to such organization, dedicated to similar purposes and qualified for exemption under Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, or under such successor provision of the code as may be in effect at the time of the Society's dissolution or termination, as the Council of the Society shall deem best qualified to carry on the functions of the Society.

Section 6. Publication. The Society shall publish and own a Journal in the field of evolution and such other publications as authorized by the Council. The membership dues include a subscription for the Journal. 

The Editor-in-Chief shall form a Senior Editorial Team consisting of himself/herself as well as two Handling Editors. The Handling Editors are nominated by the Editor-in-Chief, are appointed by a majority vote of council, and serve at the pleasure of the Editor-in-Chief. The term of the Editors coincides with that of the Editor-in-Chief. Editors may serve multiple terms if nominated by the next Editor-in-Chief and reappointed by vote of Council; they may serve immediately following a term as Associate Editor. Only the Editor-in-Chief is a member of Council. If the Editor-in-Chief is unable to attend the annual Council meeting, another member of the Senior Editorial Team may serve as a voting member (proxy) in their stead.

The Senior Editors shall be assisted by editorial assistants and a Board of Associate Editors. Editorial assistants shall be nominated by the Editor-in-Chief, appointed by the Council, and serve at the pleasure of the Editor-in-Chief. Board members shall be nominated by the Editor-in-Chief and appointed by the Council for a term of three (3) years. Retiring Associate Editors are again eligible one year after the expiration of their previous term. Appointees to the Editorial Board should represent the diversity of the membership of the Society, in so far as this is compatible with the acquisition of excellent and committed personnel. 

A Senior Editor or Editor-in-Chief may be removed by a 3/4 vote of Council. Associate Editors can be removed by a more than 4/5 vote of the Senior Editors, Editor-in-Chief, President, and Executive Vice President.

Section 7. Communications. Throughout the Constitution and Bylaws, “mail” refers to postal or electronic correspondence, and “vote” refers to a paper, voice, or electronic vote.

Section 8.  Tax Year.  The tax year of the corporation is January 1 to December 31.


ARTICLE VIII.   AMENDMENTS

Section 1. Amendments. Bylaws may be amended by the Council by majority vote.

Section 2.  Articles of Incorporation, Constitution, and Bylaws.  The majority affirmative vote by the Council is necessary to make, alter, amend or repeal the Articles of Incorporation, Constitution, or the Bylaws.  Quorum requirements apply. Proper written notice must be given in advance to all voting Councilors, including a written copy and written explanation of the proposed amendments.


View full page

Business Office Contacts

Heather Cacanindin, Executive Director, Botanical Society of America
SSE-Manager@EvolutionSociety.org

Society for the Study of Evolution
4344 Shaw Blvd
St. Louis, MO 63110
314-577-9554 
www.EvolutionSociety.org  

Society Contacts

Communications
Kati Moore, Communications Specialist
communications@evolutionsociety.org

President
Anne Charmantier, President 
president@evolutionsociety.org

Executive Vice President
Howard Rundle, Executive Vice President
execvp@evolutionsociety.org

Secretary
Sarah Schaack, Secretary
secretary@evolutionsociety.org

Treasurer
Courtney Murren, Treasurer
treasurer@evolutionsociety.org

Graduate Student Advisory Council (GSAC)
Susu Cong, Graduate Student Advisory Council Chair
gsac@evolutionsociety.org

Diversity Committee
Pamela Yeh and Laurie Stevison, Diversity Committee Co-chairs
diversity@evolutionsociety.org

Education & Outreach Committee
Rich Kliman, Education & Outreach Committee Chair
education@evolutionsociety.org

International Committee
María del Rosario Castañeda, International Committee Chair
international@evolutionsociety.org

Nominating Committee
Cameron Ghalmbor, Nominating Committee Chair
cameron [dot] ghalambor [at] ntnu [dot] no

Public Policy Committee
Liz Alter, Public Policy Committee Chair
policy@evolutionsociety.org


View full page

About SSE Membership
Membership Benefits
Membership Types
Membership Fees
Global Membership Assistance Program (for researchers in lower GDP countries)
SSE Membership Award (new 2020)
Member Login
(access publication discount codes here)

 

About

The Society for the Study of Evolution has several options for membership. Our main area of expertise is in supporting professional scientists and their students, but we also encourage K-12, community college educators, and affiliated professionals to join us in our mission. Memberships are for a calendar year, January 1 – December 31. You may join and/or renew your membership online with a credit card or by mail. Come be part of a worldwide community that promotes the study of organic evolution!


Click here to renew your membership or join the Society. 

Mail-in Membership Form
To join or renew by mail, please use this form: 2024 Mail-In Membership Join/Renew Form

Gift Memberships
You can now give a gift membership to a student for $10. This is a great way to introduce students to the Society for the first time. You can do this at the same time as your renewal or at a later date.
https://payments.evolutionsociety.org/.

If you have any problems, please contact us at sse-manager@evolutionsociety.org. 

 

 

Membership Types

Regular Member: Any person who is a professional in the field and does not fit into the categories below.  
Postdoc Member: Any member who is either holding or transitioning from/to a current postdoctoral position, or has completed a PhD no more than 8 years earlier and does not hold a permanent position. 
Student Member: Any full-time (degree-seeking) student who submits an application. 
Emeritus Member: Professional who is now retired.
K-12 Educator: K-12 teachers interested in evolution and our mission. 
Family Members:
 Members of the families of one of the member types above. Family members have the same privileges as other members. Can only be purchased in addition to another membership type.
Life Membership: Purchase a lifetime membership, including online access during your lifetime with no need to renew each year. Fee: $1,000 
Gift Membership: Current members may purchase one-year gift memberships for students for $10. Purchase gift memberships here.

***Researchers from lower-income countries may be eligible for free or reduced discounts through the SSE Global Membership Assistance Program. See below for more details.***

Membership Fees

SSE now offers multi-year memberships. Sign up for a 2-year membership to receive a 10% discount, or a 3-year membership to receive a 20% discount. 

Membership
Type
1-year
membership
2-year membership
(10% discount)
3-year membership 
(20% discount)
Regular $60.00 $108.00 $144.00
Postdoc $40.00  $72.00  $96.00
Student $25.00   $45.00 $60.00
Emeritus $25.00   $45.00 $60.00
K-12 Educator $25.00  $45.00  $60.00
Family Member $10.00 $18.00 $24.00


Lifetime memberships can be purchased for $1,000.00.

 

Benefits of SSE Membership

SSE members enjoy numerous benefits, including:

●    Eligibility to apply for a variety of awards to fund travel to the annual meeting and recognize exemplary efforts in evolutionary research, education, and outreach

●    Discounted registration fee for our joint annual meeting with the American Society of Naturalists and the Society of Systematic Biologists, where you can make connections, foster relationships, find your next job and share information & research with scientists and educators around the world

●    Professional development opportunities, such as sponsoring a symposium at the annual meeting, serving on a committee, running for SSE Council, or participating in educational outreach and mentorship activities

●    Access to online resources, webinars, and workshops by American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS), the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), and the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) through SSE’s professional affiliations

 

Additional discounts include:

●     Free traditional publication in Evolution 

●     Free online access to Evolution

●     50% discount on fees for Open Access publication in Evolution

●     30% discount on fees for publication in Evolution Letters, our Open Access journal with the European Society fo Evolutionary Biology

To learn how to claim these discounts and access Evolution online, log in to the SSE site here.

 

Your membership fees enable the SSE to invest in:

  • Over $100,000 US per year in grants, awards and prizes to evolutionary biologists at all career stages

  • Yearly subscriptions to cover costs of Dryad data archiving for authors of Evolution and Evolution Letters

  • Policy and advocacy work by financially supporting AIBS, AAAS, and NCSE

  • Professional development events (e.g., Diverse Careers, Diversity in Science) at the annual meeting

  • International symposia and workshops on evolutionary biology in developing countries

  • Outreach and education events at the annual meeting and beyond through our support of the BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action

 

Global Membership Assistance Program

The SSE Global Membership Assistance (GMA) Program offers free or discounted membership to students, researchers, and educators in 152 countries and territories around the world based on World Bank classifications. Check the list of countries below to see if you are eligible.

GMA Group 1: 50% Discount on SSE Membership

Albania Brazil Ecuador Indonesia Libya Nauru

Samoa Turkey
Antigua and Barbuda Bulgaria
Equatorial Guinea
Islamic Rep. Iran Lithuania North Macedonia Serbia Turkmenistan
Argentina Chile Fiji Iraq Malaysia Palau Seychelles Tuvalu
Armenia China Gabon Jamaica Maldives Panama South Africa Uruguay
Azerbaijan Colombia Georgia Jordan Marshall Islands Paraguay St. Lucia Venezuela
Belarus Costa Rica Grenada Kazakhstan Mauritius Peru St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Belize Cuba Guatemala Kosovo Mexico Qatar Suriname
Bosnia and Herzegovina Dominica Guyana Latvia Montenegro Romania Thailand
Botswana Dominican Republic Hungary Lebanon Namibia Russian Federation Tonga


GMA Group 2: Free SSE Membership

Afghanistan Cameroon Ethiopia Kyrgyz Republic Morocco São Tomé and Principe

Togo
Algeria Central African Republic

The Gambia Lao PDR Mozambique Senegal Tunisia
American
Samoa

Chad Ghana Lesotho Myanmar Sierra Leone Uganda
Angola

Comoros Guam Liberia Nepal Solomon Islands Ukraine
Bangladesh

Dem. Rep.
Congo
Guinea Madagascar Nicaragua Somalia US Virgin Islands
Benin

Rep. Congo Guinea-Bissau Malawi Niger South Sudan Uzbekistan
Bhutan

Côte d'Ivoire Haiti Mali Nigeria Sri Lanka Vanuatu
Bolivia

Djibouti Honduras Mariana Islands Pakistan Sudan Vietnam
Burkina Faso

Arab Rep. Egypt India Mauritania Papua New
Guinea
Syrian Arab
Republic
West Bank and Gaza
Burundi

El Salvador Kenya Fed. Sts.
Micronesia
Philippines Tajikistan Rep. Yemen
Cabo Verde

Eritrea Kiribati Moldova Puerto Rico Tanzania Zambia
Cambodia Eswatini Dem. People's
Rep. Korea


Mongolia Rwanda Timor-Leste Zimbabwe

If you reside in a country or territory listed above, please complete this form to request a discount code which can be used when joining or renewing your membership:

You will be asked for your name, email address, and the name of the country in which you reside. Codes will be sent via email within 1-2 business days. Please email Kati Moore at communications@evolutionsociety.org with any questions.

Your code will be valid for any one-year, two-year, or three-year membership type. (Learn more about our membership types here.)

To learn more about SSE’s efforts to make the Society more welcoming for international members, visit the SSE International Committee page. Please contact Committee Chair at international@evolutionsociety.org with any questions, comments, or suggestions.
 
 

Evolution 2024 Global Meeting Participation

SSE is pleased to offer free registration for the virtual portion of the 3rd Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology, also referred to as Evolution 2024, to SSE members who reside in one of the 152 countries and territories listed above. The virtual portion of the meeting will take place June 27-28, 2024.

To apply for free meeting registration:

  1. Check the list above to confirm that you live in one of the 152 countries or territories eligible for the Global Membership Assistance (GMA) program.
  2. If you are not yet a member of SSE, request a code for free or discounted SSE membership through the GMA program (information above). 
  3. If you are already a member of SSE, confirm that your membership is current by logging in with your SSE username and password.
  4. Once you have activated, renewed, or confirmed your SSE membership, complete the form to request a code for free meeting registration.
  5. After you receive your discount code, register for the meeting using the appropriate member category.

A limited number of codes are available and will be distributed on a first-come, first-served basis. Please allow 2-3 business days to receive your code after completing the form. If all available codes have already been distributed, it will be indicated here.

Questions? Email Kati Moore at communications@evolutionsociety.org. Thanks for your interest in attending Evolution 2024!

Request Discount Code button



SSE Membership Award

This award offers free two-year SSE memberships to 100 individuals of any career stage who identify as racial or ethnic minorities, either in their country of origin or their country of residence. This initiative is part of SSE Council’s 2020 commitment to actions to increase inclusion of and support for members of historically excluded groups, particularly individuals who identify as Black, Indigenous, or people of color (BIPOC), in the field of evolutionary biology and through all of the society’s activities and programs. Learn more and apply here

Learn More button


View full page

Evolution journal cover Evolution Letters journal cover

Evolution

Edited by: Jason Wolf, PhD 
Impact Factor: 3.3 
ISI Journal Citation Reports © Ranking: 2023: 20/52 (Evolutionary Biology); 59 out of 169 (Q2) (Ecology); 73/171 (Q2) (Genetics & Heredity)
Online ISSN: 1558-5646

Evolution Letters

Edited by: Judith Mank, PhD
Impact Factor: 5.3
Online ISSN: 2056-3744
ISI Journal Citation Reports © Ranking: 2023: 7/52 (Q1) (Evolutionary Biology)  
 
 

Evolution Highlights

Evolution Letters Short Talks


SSE members can publish for free in Evolution. SSE members can also receive a 50% discount on Open Access publication in Evolution and a 30% on publication in the Open Access journal Evolution Letters. To access these publication discounts,
 input the email address associated with your SSE membership on the Oxford University Press website when prompted for a membership number. Contact communications@evolutionsociety.org with any questions. 


View full page

The Evolution annual meetings are held jointly by the Society for the Study of Evolution, the American Society of Naturalists and the Society of Systematic Biologists.


2017 Meeting - Portland, OR

 

Past Meetings

2016 - Austin, TX   1,786 Attendees
2015 - Guarujá, São Paulo, Brazil
2014 - Raleigh, NC  1,958 Attendees 
2013 - Snowbird, UT   1,429 Attendees 
2012 - Evolution Ottawa   2,450 Attendees
2011 - Norman, OK   1,150 Attendees
2010 - Portland, OR   1,967 Attendees
2009 - Moscow, ID   1,102 Attendees
2008 - Minneapolis, MN  1,450 Attendees
2007 - Christchurch, NZ
2006 - Stony Brook, NY
2005 - Fairbanks, AK
2004 - Fort Collins, CO  1,296 Attendees
2003 - Chico, CA

 

 


View full page

2024 Deadlines

January 29: Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution Program
January 31: SSE Presidents’ Award for Outstanding Dissertation Paper in Evolution
January 31: International Travel Stipends
February 1: Thomas Henry Huxley Award
February 23: 
Graduate Research Excellence Grants - R.C. Lewontin Early Awards
March 1: Small Grants Program for Local and Regional Outreach Promoting the Understanding of Evolutionary Biology 
March 15: Graduate Student and Postdoc Registration Waiver
March 15: Caregiver Awards
April 15: Hamilton Award for Outstanding Graduate Student Presentation
September: Sponsored Symposia 
September: Lifetime Achievement Award
October: Inclusiveness, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA) Award
October: Graduate Research Excellence Grants - Rosemary Grant Advanced Awards
December 1: Theodosius Dobzhansky Prize

Accepted on a rolling basis:
SSE Membership Awards

Deadline to be determined:
International Event Grants

Not being held in 2024:
Stephen Jay Gould Prize 
Early-Career Vocational Opportunities Workshop Grants

Award Descriptions

NOTE: Indirect costs may not be charged to any of our awards or grants.

PRIZES

Theodosius Dobzhansky Prize 

The Theodosius Dobzhansky Prize is awarded annually by the Society for the Study of Evolution to recognize the accomplishments and future promise of an outstanding early-career evolutionary biologist. The prize was established in memory of Professor Dobzhansky by his friends and colleagues, and reflects his lifelong commitment to fostering the research careers of young scientists.

SSE Presidents’ Award for Outstanding Dissertation Paper in Evolution

The SSE Presidents' Award for Outstanding Dissertation Paper in Evolution is awarded annually by the Society for the Study of Evolution for an outstanding PhD dissertation paper published in the journal Evolution during a given calendar year.

Stephen Jay Gould Prize 

The Stephen Jay Gould Prize is awarded annually by the Society for the Study of Evolution to recognize individuals whose sustained and exemplary efforts have advanced public understanding of evolutionary science and its importance in biology, education, and everyday life in the spirit of Stephen Jay Gould. This prize will not be offered in 2024.

W. D. Hamilton Award 

The Hamilton Award will be given to a student or recent graduate who has presented an outstanding talk at the annual meeting, as judged by a committee of SSE members. Applicants will present their papers during regular sessions of the meeting, appropriate for their topic. The most competitive talks will be those that can convey a complete story.

Thomas Henry Huxley Award

This award named in honor of Darwin's very public supporter T. H. Huxley, was established in 2013 to recognise outreach and education achievement for early and mid career scientists. Winners of this award are provided with support to present on behalf of the Society for the Study of Evolution at the annual meeting of the National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT). Annual calls for nomination will be advertised on the SSE web site and through appropriate Evolutionary Biology web sources such as EVOLDIR in late January/early February.

Inclusiveness, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA) Award

The American Society of Naturalists, the Society for the Study of Evolution, and the Society of Systematic Biologists announce the call for nominations for the 1st annual ASN/SSE/SSB Inclusiveness, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA) Award. The IDEA Award will be given to a person at any career stage who has strengthened the ecology and evolutionary biology community by promoting inclusiveness and diversity in our fields. The award can also be presented to a group. The recipient will receive a plaque at the annual meeting of ASN/SSB/SSE and a $1000 honorarium. 

Lifetime Achievement Award

The Lifetime Achievement Award was created to recognize individuals who have made substantial contributions to the study of evolution, who have demonstrated outstanding mentorship of trainees, and/or who have provided noteworthy service to the evolution community. Nominations should be submitted by April 1. 

SSE Membership Award

This award offers free two-year SSE memberships to 100 individuals of any career stage who identify as racial or ethnic minorities, either in their country of origin or their country of residence. This initiative is part of SSE Council’s 2020 commitment to actions to increase inclusion of and support for members of historically excluded groups, particularly individuals who identify as Black, Indigenous, or people of color (BIPOC), in the field of evolutionary biology and through all of the society’s activities and programs. Learn more and apply here
 
 

GRANTS

Graduate Research Excellence Grants (GREGs)

R.C. Lewontin Early Awards: The GREG – R.C. Lewontin Early Awards are to assist students in the early stages of their PhD programs by enabling them to collect preliminary data (to pursue additional sources of support) or to enhance the scope of their research beyond current funding limits (e.g. by visiting additional field sites, or working at other labs). Awards up to $2500. Students must confirm that the proposed work is outside of funding already held by the student or advisor. 

Rosemary Grant Advanced Awards: The GREG - Rosemary Grant Advanced Awards are to assist students in the later stages of their PhD programs. Funds can be used to enhance the scope of dissertation research, such as to conduct additional experiments or field work. Awards up to $3500. Only PhD students who have completed at least 24 months of PhD work and are at least 12 months from degree completion at the proposal due date are eligible. Eligibility can be confirmed by the advisor or graduate director stating that the student fulfills these requirements. Students must confirm that the proposed work is outside other funding held by either the student or their advisor. 

Early-Career Vocational Opportunities (EVO) Workshop Grants

The SSE Council and GSAC invite proposals for grants up to $3,000 to help support Society-sponsored Early-career Vocational Opportunities (EVO) Workshops. This is a new program to provide valuable learning opportunities for Society graduate students and postdocs. The topic of the workshop can be anything, and material can be presented in any format, as long as it is interactive and its content serves to provide foundational skills that are appropriate for early-career SSE members in the areas of conceptual understanding, data collection, data analysis, or professional development. Applications will be accepted on a rolling basis. (Paused for 2023.)

Small Grants Program for Local and Regional Outreach Promoting the Understanding of Evolutionary Biology

The SSE provides opportunities for SSE members to apply for awards up to $1,000. The Committee encourages partnerships between other bodies engaged in outreach, such as museums, local schools, etc.

International Event Grants 

The goal of these grants is to foster communication and collaboration between scientists from different countries by sponsoring international symposia, workshops, courses, and other events within the field of evolutionary biology. Our priority is to support events that benefit emerging communities in the field of evolutionary biology. These grants replace the “Co-sponsorship of symposia organized by non-US based evolution societies” grants and Evolution International Events Awards (EIE Awards).

Sponsored Symposia 

The Society for the Study of Evolution supports symposia (typically two) at its annual meetings in order to highlight new topics, provide new perspectives, or generate new syntheses. The exact configuration of symposia may vary from year to year, but proposals should tentatively assume six half-hour slots. The Society provides support for organizers and participants in sponsored symposia to attend and present at the annual meeting (up to $9000 per symposium).  

TRAVEL AWARDS

Travel award recipients are not eligible to volunteer at the conference.

SSE Graduate Student and Postdoc Registration Waiver

This program is for graduate students and postdoctoral fellows interested in attending and presenting at the in-person annual Evolution meeting, especially those who need additional financial support in order to attend. This program replaces the SSE Graduate Student and Postdoc Travel Supplement. 

Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution Program 

The Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution (UDE) program sends undergraduate students to the annual Evolution meeting, the joint meeting of the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE), the Society of Systematic Biologists (SSB), and the American Society of Naturalists (ASN). At the meeting, students will (i) present a poster, (ii) receive mentoring from graduate students, postdocs, and faculty, and (iii) participate in a career-oriented 'Undergraduate Futures in Evolutionary Biology' panel and discussion. Each selected awardee receives conference registration, round-trip airfare, dorm accommodations (double occupancy), a $200 meal stipend, and a ticket to the Super Social. Learn more on the UDE Program page

International Travel Stipends 

These stipends are for students and young scientists to attend the annual Evolution meetingAwards may also be used to attend the annual meeting of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). Scientists working in a country with high GDP are not eligible. 


View full page

Note:
***This award is being moved to once every three years. The next competition will be announced in 2026.***
 
 
 

2023 Recipient: James T. Costa

Text: James T. Costa. 2023 Society for the Study of Evolution Gould Prize. Headshot of James Costa.

The SSE Gould Prize Committee is pleased to announce Dr. James T. Costa as the 2023 recipient of the Stephen Jay Gould Prize. Dr. Costa was selected for his work to advance the public understanding of evolution and the history of evolutionary thinking, and for his work to promote biodiversity education and conservation through outreach and community engagement. 

Dr. Costa is the author of several books and other publications on the history of evolutionary biology focusing on the contributions of Alfred Russel Wallace and Charles Darwin, including "The Annotated Origin," the popular science book "Darwin's Backyard: How Small Experiments Led to a Big Theory," and his most recent book "Radical by Nature: The Revolutionary Life of Alfred Russel Wallace." 

For more than 17 years, Dr. Costa has served as the executive director of Western Carolina University's Highlands Biological Station, which is located in a southern Appalachian biodiversity hotspot and has provided experiential learning opportunities, research support, and outreach programming for students and professionals at all levels since 1927.

Dr. Costa is professor of biology at Western Carolina University, where he teaches courses on biogeography, Darwin’s Origin of Species, and a comparative temperate-tropical ecology field course taught at Highlands Biological Station and Wildsumaco Biological Station in Ecuador. He is also adjunct professor in the Department of Biology and Institute for the Environment at UNC-Chapel Hill, and research associate in entomology at Harvard's Museum of Comparative Zoology.   

He is a recipient of the Alfred Russel Wallace medal, serves as a Trustee of the Charles Darwin Trust, and has held research fellowships at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study of Harvard University, Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, LuEsther T. Mertz Library of the New York Botanical Garden, and the DFG-Centre for Advanced Study at the University of Hamburg. 

Dr. Costa will present the Gould Prize plenary at the Evolution 2023 meeting on June 21 in Albuquerque, NM. 

Text: Society for the Study of Evolution, 2023 Gould Prize to recognize individuals who have increased public understanding of evolutionary biology. Nominations due January 15, 2023. Background is blue with out of focus tan circles.

About

The Stephen Jay Gould Prize is awarded annually to recognize individuals whose sustained and exemplary efforts have advanced public understanding of evolutionary science and its importance in biology, education, and everyday life in the spirit of Stephen Jay Gould.

The award will include a cash prize of $5,000 and the expectation that the recipient will present the Public Outreach Seminar at the Evolution Meeting (expenses for travel/lodging and registration are covered by SSE). Awardees will be encouraged to submit an accompanying article to Evolution (primary research, review, insight or commentary, fast-tracked through review and made freely available) within 2 months of the conference. Published articles would highlight the prize obtained. The awardee should be a leader in evolutionary thought and in public outreach who can deliver an inspiring lecture for both professionals and the broader public at the annual Evolution meeting

How to apply

Nominations should include the CV of the nominee along with a 1-2 page letter describing why this individual is worthy of the award. Nominations will be accepted via our online awards platform. All nominations will be treated confidentially and will be evaluated by members of the Committee and the Council for the Society. An awardee will be announced in early February. Please contact communications [at] evolutionsociety.org with any questions.

green button with white Apply Now text

Or click here to access the application.

Note: Be sure to hit “Complete” after filling out the nomination form in order to submit your nomination!

You may be prompted to log in after clicking “Complete”, but that is not necessary. Rest assured that your application has been submitted.

DEADLINE: January 15, 2023


 
 
 

Stephen J. Gould Prize recipients and presentations:

2009, Dr. Eugenie C. Scott | YouTube.com
2012, David Quammen | YouTube.com
2015, Francisco Ayala | YouTube.com
2019, Mohamed Noor | YouTube.com
2010, Dr. Sean B. Carroll | YouTube.com
2013, Judith G. Scotchmoor | YouTube.com
2016, Carl Zimmer | YouTube.com
2021, Leslie J. Rissler | YouTube.com


2011, Dr. Kenneth R. Miller

2014, Dr. Steve Jones | YouTube.com


2017, Timothy R. Birkhead

2022, Dr. Lisa White | YouTube.com

View full page

Text: Society for the Study of Evolution Dobzhansky Prize to recognize the accomplishments and future promise of an outstanding early-career evolutionary biologist, Nominations due December 1, 2023. 

ABOUT | ELIGIBILITY | HOW TO APPLY | EVALUATION CRITERIA | AWARD | PAST WINNERS

About

The Dobzhansky Prize is awarded annually by the Society for the Study of Evolution to recognize the accomplishments and future promise of an outstanding early-career evolutionary biologist. The prize was established in memory of Professor Theodosius Dobzhansky by his friends and colleagues, and reflects his lifelong commitment to fostering the research careers of young scientists.

Eligibility

We seek nominees working in all areas of evolutionary biology, on any taxonomic group/system, using empirical and/or theoretical approaches. We hope the pool of nominees will reflect the many axes and components of diversity in the evolutionary biology community. We are specifically looking for candidates who take creative approaches to answering pressing questions in evolutionary biology. We welcome nominations of researchers around the globe.

Specific requirements:

  • The nominee's university must have officially awarded their degree (Ph.D. or equivalent) between December 1, 2019 and December 1, 2023.*
  • The nominee must be actively involved in research in the field of evolutionary biology.
  • The nominee does not have to be a member of the Society for the Study of Evolution, but membership is encouraged. Learn more about the benefits of SSE membership and how to join.

*Please note that this is the official date the PhD or equivalent was awarded by the nomination's institution, which may not be the same date as an oral defense, viva, or live defense. The committee will consider circumstances that may extend eligibility (e.g., parental leave) and encourages nominations of biologists from historically under-represented groups. Please contact committee chair Sarah Schaack at secretary@evolutionsociety.org with any questions about eligibility.

How to Apply

Candidates may apply directly or may be nominated. Each nomination should include:  

  • a curriculum vitae, which should include any research, teaching, and/or mentorship, and outreach activities
  • a summary of research accomplishments (maximum 3 pages, including references)
  • a statement of research plans for the next 5 years (maximum 4 pages, including references)
  • full text of three recent publications
  • three reference letters

Please submit items 1-4 as a single pdf. Reference letter writers should send their letters via email to the SSE Secretary at secretary@evolutionsociety.org by December 1, 2023 with the nominee’s name in the subject line. Please provide the names and email addresses of references on the nomination form.

Submit Nomination button

Deadline: December 1, 2023, 5:00 PM EST
 
Note: Be sure to click “Complete” after filling out the nomination form in order to submit your nomination! You may be prompted to log in after clicking “Complete”, but that is not necessary. Rest assured that your application has been submitted!
 
 

Evaluation Criteria

Nominations will be scored on the following areas:

  1. How engaged is this person, in terms of papers, talks or posters, and outreach?
  2. How independent, broad, and deep is the record of past evolution research?
  3. What is the potential impact, scope, and clarity of future research plans?
  4. Are this person's discoveries contributing to major changes within the field of evolution?

Award

The Dobzhansky Prize is accompanied by a check for U.S. $5000, and is awarded at the annual Evolution meeting. The recipient is expected to be present to receive the award and to give an oral presentation about their research. To facilitate attendance, SSE provides funds to cover the costs of conference registration, accommodation during the conference, and expenses for travel to and from the conference. The recipient will be notified of the award in late March.

Awardees will also be encouraged to submit an accompanying article to Evolution (primary research, review, insight or commentary, fast-tracked through review and made freely available) within 2 months of the conference. Published articles would highlight the award obtained.

 

Past Winners:

        1990   Erik Greene       2000   Thomas Lenormand       2010   Fyodor Kondrashov   
1981   Douglas R. Cavener       1991   Jonathan Losos       2001   Alexander Badyaev       2011   Joel McGlothlin  
1982  Elizabeth Anne Zimmer       1992   Barry Sinervo       2002   Howard Rundle        2012   Daniel Rabosky  
1983 Anthony J. Zera     1993   H. Allen Orr       2003   Daven Presgraves       2013   Rowan D. H. Barrett  
1984   Robb F. Leary     1994   David Haig       2004   Aneil Agrawal       2014   Daniel Matute  
1985 Joshua J. Schwartz      1995   David Begun       2005   Daniel Bolnick       2015   Katie Wagner
        1996   Rufus A. Johnstone       2006   Russel Bonduriansky        2016   Mary Caswell Stoddard
1987   Ary A. Hoffmann       1997   Massimo Pigliucci        2007   Franziska Michor       2017  Molly Schumer
1988  Steven A. Frank       1998   Christian P. Klingenberg       2008   Patrik Nosil       2018   Amanda Kyle Gibson
1989 Bernard J. Crespi     1999   Jason B. Wolf       2009   Judith Mank        2019 Matthew Pennell
2020 Jacqueline Sztepanacz
2021 Katja Kasimatis
Honorable Mentions:
Amanda Hund
Rosana Zenil-Ferguson
2022 Philipp Brand
Honorable mention: Jennifer Coughlan
2023 Dakota McCoy

 



View full page

Text: Society for the Study of Evolution SSE Presidents' Award for Outstanding Dissertation Paper in Evolution. Nominations Due January 31, 2024. Covers of two Evolution issues.
 

About

This award is awarded annually by the Society for the Study of Evolution for an outstanding Ph.D. dissertation paper published in an issue of the journal Evolution during a given calendar year. Applications open in the fall and close January 31. The award comes with a $1000 honorarium.

Eligibility

To be eligible for consideration, a manuscript must be based on PhD work of the primary author. The manuscript must have been published in a 2023 issue of the journal Evolution (Volume 77).* Nominees do not need to be members of SSE.

*Note that this does not include all papers that were published as Early View in 2023. The paper must have been included in an issue in 2023.

Award

The SSE Presidents’ Award is accompanied by a check for U.S. $1000, and will be awarded at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Evolution. The recipient is invited to attend the annual meeting to receive the award. To facilitate attendance, SSE provides funds to cover the costs of conference registration, accommodation during the conference, and travel expenses to and from the conference. The recipient will be notified of the award in April.

How to apply

Nominations are accepted through our online awards portal. SSE members must log in with their SSE username and password. Non-members must create a free account to submit a nomination.

Nominations must include:

  • the final version of the manuscript  
  • dissertation completion date
  • supporting letter from the PhD supervisor or other individual familiar with the candidate and their work 

The supporting letter should indicate the candidate’s role in completing the research and writing the paper (if the candidate is not the sole author), should place the work in the larger context of the field (novelty, importance), and should discuss the overall quality of the student's research.

Apply now button

Or click here to access the application.

Note: Be sure to hit “Complete” after filling out the application form in order to submit your application!

You may be prompted to log in after clicking “Complete”, but that is not necessary. Rest assured that your application has been submitted!

DEADLINE: 5:00 PM Eastern Time (GMT-4:00), January 31, 2024
 
 
 


Past Winners

2023 Michael Itgen (more info)
2022 Maddie James (more info)
2021 Gabriel Jamie (more info)
2020 Dorota Paczesniak (more info)
2019 Matthew Zuellig (more info)
2018 Valerie Morley (more info)
2017 Megan Greischar (more info)
2016 Jennifer Lohr (more info)
2015 Alison E. Wright (more info)
2014 Amy Hurford (more info)
2013 William Soto
2012 David McCandlish
2011 D. Luke Mahler
2010 Britt Koskella
2009 Megan Higgie
2008 R. Brian Langerhans
2007 Guillaume Martin
2006 Maurine Neiman


 
2023

Michael Itgen headshot.The 2023 winner is Dr. Michael Itgen for his paper, “Genome size drives morphological evolution in organ-specific ways” (Evolution, Volume 76, Issue 7 1 July 2022, Pages 1453–1468, https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14519.)

In this paper, Dr. Itgen and co-authors examined the influence of large genome size and cell size on the morphological variation in the heart and liver of salamanders in the genus Plethodon, which have some of the largest genomes known for tetrapods. The authors found that evolutionary increases in genome and cell size result in dramatic changes in tissue structure in the heart and liver. In both cases, these structural changes should have negative impacts on organ function. To explain how these changes persist, the authors propose that the effects on organismal performance and fitness may be negligible because very low metabolic rates in salamanders relax selective pressure on the function of key metabolic organs. This study shows how comparative and developmental studies can yield surprising insights on long-standing evolutionary development questions such as the variation and evolution of genome size. Dr. Itgen earned his Ph.D. at Colorado State University and is now a postdoctoral research fellow at Marian University in Indianapolis, IN.  

2022

The 2022 recipient is Dr. Maddie E. James for her paper, “Phenotypic and genotypic parallel evolution in parapatric ecotypes of Senecio.” Evolution (2021) 75-12: 3115–3131. 

In this paper, Dr. James and co-authors investigated potential parallel evolution in dune and headland ecotypes of the Australian wildflower Senecio lautus. A comparison of nine dune-headland pairs, most phylogenetic sister groups, found strong parallel evolution of phenotype of branch and leaf traits with dune plants tall and headland plants prostrate. Despite phenotypic similarity among populations within each ecotype, evolutionary change was found in different genes. However, further investigation found a number of these genes had the same predicted function. This study shows response to selection that leads to parallel phenotypes is more complex when viewed at the underlying genetic level. Dr. James earned her Ph.D. at the University of Queensland, where she is now a Postdoctoral Research Fellow. 

 

2021

Jamie sitting in a field in a red and blue plaid shirt holding something in his palm and smiling at the cameraThe 2021 recipient is Dr. Gabriel Jamie for his paper, “Multimodal mimicry of hosts in a radiation of parasitic finches,” Evolution (2020) 74: 2526-2538. 

In this paper, Dr. Gabriel Jamie and co-authors investigated host-specific multimodal mimicry by nestlings of brood-parasitic Vidua indigobirds and whydahs to assess their role in adaptation to novel hosts. The premise was that imprinting of parasitic nestlings on their hosts promotes the maintenance of specialized host-parasite associations over generations. This exposes lineages to consistent selection from host species that could allow host-specific nestling adaptations to evolve. Over four rainy seasons in Zambia, Dr. Jamie and his research assistants recorded aspects of nestling morphology and behavior, and developed a new methodology to quantify phenotypes. Remarkable matching was found in the patterns and colors of the parasitic nestlings and the nestlings of their different host species, whose diverse appearances can be seen in the cover photo of the issue (74:11). The team also found matching in the sounds and postural movements of the nestlings. This study shows that imprinting can lead to the evolution of host-specific mimetic adaptations that can generate pre- and post-zygotic isolation and contribute to sympatric speciation. Dr. Jamie earned his Ph.D. at the University of Cambridge, where he is now a BBSRC-funded post-doctoral research associate. He is also a research associate of the FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology at the University of Cape Town.

2020

The 2020 winner is Dr. Dorota Paczesniak for her paper, "Parasite resistance predicts fitness better than fecundity in a natural population of the freshwater snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum," Evolution (2019) 73: 1634-1646.

A longstanding question in evolutionary biology is what evolutionary processes determine whether a species is sexual or asexual.  Dr. Paczesniak addressed this question in a species of freshwater snail, Potamopyrgus antipodarum, native to New Zealand. Using mesocosms in a field setting, she found that the most fecund asexual clones had annual reproductive rates equal to or greater than the most fecund 10% of sexual families, indicating that fecundity selection is sufficient to favor the proliferation of asexual clones, over and above the expected two-fold cost of sex. Somewhat paradoxically, however, she found that the most fecund asexual clones were not the most predominant ones. Because the mesocosms excluded predators and parasites, she hypothesized that differential predation or parasitism might explain this pattern. This hypothesis was confirmed by an experiment that demonstrated a positive correlation between clone abundance in the field and resistance to parasitism in the laboratory. This study thus elegantly demonstrates the importance of interactions with natural enemies in determining the fitness and relative abundance of asexual clones in a natural population. Dr. Paczesniak earned her PhD at the ETH Zurich, and recently completed a postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Saskatchewan.

2019

 The 2019 winner is Dr. Matthew Zuellig for his paper, “A two‐locus hybrid incompatibility is widespread, polymorphic, and active in natural populations of Mimulus” Evolution (2018) 72: 2394-2405. 

How do barriers that bar reproduction between two species arise and persist within each of the species, in spite of ongoing gene flow between them? To address this question, Dr. Zuellig studied two naturally hybridizing species of monekyflower, Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. He had previously identified a two‐locus hybrid lethality system, in which each species carries a hybrid lethality allele at a different locus, resulting in hybrid offspring that lack chlorophyll in F2 and later generations. Building on this finding, he here conducted extensive series of crosses with plants sampled across a large geographic range of western U.S. to map the spatial distribution of alleles underlying this system and estimate their frequencies. Because both species also have alternative alleles at substantial frequencies in some populations, hybrids do not necessarily result in lethality, allowing some introgression. This work elegantly explores how "speciation loci" that were first identified in the lab behave in real populations across their range. Dr. Zuellig earned his Ph.D. at the University of Georgia and is now a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Bern.
 

2018

The 2018 winner is Dr. Valerie Morley for her paper, “Dynamics of molecular evolution in RNA virus populations depend on sudden versus gradual environmental change” Evolution (2017) 71:872-883.

Do organisms evolve differently in slowly versus rapidly changing environments? In this study, Dr. Morley examined the evolutionary dynamics of the RNA sequence of Sindbis virus, exposed either directly to a novel host or to a gradually increasing proportion of that host. By sampling and sequencing in depth at eight time points, Dr. Morley and co-authors were able to track the genetic changes that occurred in precise detail. Their study revealed that large-step mutations were more likely to fix during the early stages of evolution with a sudden host switch, but this pattern disappeared with a gradual switch. As selection was weaker and fixation took longer in the gradually changing treatment, there was more evidence of clonal interference and the fixation of clusters of mutations. By contrast, single mutations were more likely to sweep in the sudden treatment. By combining experimental evolution with whole-genome sequencing, the paper by Morley et al. provides novel insights into the ways that populations adapt to a changing world.

 

2017

 The 2017 winner is Dr. Megan Greischar, for her paper “Predicting optimal transmission investment in malaria parasites.” Evolution (2016) 70:1542-1558.

In this study, Dr. Greischar examined the growth-reproduction tradeoff faced by malaria parasites, which must allocate resources to within-host proliferation as well as the production of specialized life stages for onward transmission. The way parasites balance this tradeoff influences exploitation of host resources---and hence virulence---and the rate of disease spread through host populations. She built a within-host model to examine the conflicting selection pressures and identify the optimal allocation to transmission. She developed novel computational methods to consider a wide range of potential strategies, using splines to describe plastic allocation with few parameters. The model suggested that parasites benefit from delaying transmission stage production, just as macroorganisms can benefit from delayed reproductive effort. Innate immunity and coinfecting parasites imposed strong selection favoring parasites that invest disproportionately in proliferation rather than transmission (“reproductive restraint''), resulting in more rapid and extreme exploitation of host resources. Selection on transmission investment therefore represents one mechanism by which enhanced virulence could be adaptive for parasites. More generally, the approach can accommodate highly complex strategies within richly detailed ecological models, providing a much-needed alternative to analytical methods that could be adapted to diverse organisms.

 

 

2016

The 2016 winner is Dr. Jennifer N. Lohr, for her paper: Lohr, J. N., and C. R. Haag. 2015. Genetic load, inbreeding depression, and hybrid vigor covary with population size: An empirical evaluation of theoretical predictions. Evolution 69:3109-3122.

In this paper, Lohr and Haag test predictions from population genetic theory on the genetic consequences of small population size, a fundamental question in evolutionary biology. Lohr used eight natural populations of Daphnia magna that varied in effective population size, along with carefully designed crosses within and among populations, to test these predictions. She showed that Ne accurately predicted inbreeding depression, genetic load, and hybrid vigor, strongly supporting theoretical predictions based on recurrent mutation to unconditionally deleterious alleles. These results have important implications for evolutionary processes in natural populations, including for the evolution of dispersal, breeding systems, local adaptation, and aging.

Dr. Lohr received her PhD in 2015 from the Department of Biology at the University of Fribourg, with Christopher Haag. She is now a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the University of Hamburg with Susanne Dobler.

 

2015

The 2015 winner is Dr. Alison E. Wright, for her paper: Alison E. Wright, Peter W. Harrison, Stephen H. Montgomery, Marie A. Pointer and Judith E. Mank. 2014. Independent stratum formation on the avian sex chromosomes reveals inter-chromosomal gene conversion and predominance of purifying selection on the W chromosome. Evolution. 68(11):3281–3295.

In this paper, Wright and co-authors used a comparative approach across a monophyletic clade of birds, spanning 90 million years, to study the mode, mechanism and rate of divergence between the avian Z and W sex chromosomes. This work, based on the largest cross-species dataset of Z-W orthologs to date, revealed the complex recombinational history of the avian sex chromosomes. The results show that although birds share the same sex chromosome system, recombination between the sex chromosomes has been suppressed independently multiple times, allowing for convergent patterns of divergence. Wright and her co-authors also found that recombination and gene conversion persist on sex chromosomes over both long and short evolutionary trajectories. Importantly, the study shows that the female-limited and degenerated W chromosome is evolving with a significant contribution of purifying selection, indicating that the remaining W-linked genes play an important role in female-specific fitness.

Dr Wright received her PhD in 2014 from the Department of Zoology at the University of Oxford, with Judith Mank. She is now a Postdoctoral Research Associate at University College London.

 


 

2014

The 2014 winner is Dr. Amy Hurford for her paper: Hurford, A. and T. Day. 2013. Immune evasion and the evolution of molecular mimicry in parasites. Evolution 67(10): 2889-2904. Amy Hurford

Hurford explored a variety of hypotheses about the coevolution of vertebrate immune systems and pathogens, using mathematical models. One of her primary goals was to understand the evolutionary origins of infection-induced autoimmune disorders. She developed mathematical models using techniques from dynamical systems and game theory to better understand the conditions under which we might expect pathogens to evolve molecular mimicry. She and her coauthor analyzed the patterns of molecular mimicry that are expected under two hypotheses regarding molecular mimicry by parasites. One of their findings was that the highest risk of autoimmunity comes from parasites that display intermediate levels of mimicry. Interestingly, and highly relevantly, they also explored the consequences of different medical interventions on the evolution of mimicry and the incidence of autoimmunity.

Dr. Hurford received her Ph.D. in 2011 from the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at Queens University, where he was advised by Dr. Troy Day. Following postdoctoral appointments at York University and the University of Toronto, she began a faculty position at Memorial University of Newfoundland.

 


View full page

Text: Evolution 2024, Society for the Study of Evolution W. D. Hamilton Award for Outstanding Graduate Student Presentation, Deadline: April 15, 2024.

 
ABOUT
| ELIGIBILITY | HOW TO APPLY | SELECTION | FUNDING

About 

The W. D. Hamilton Award for Outstanding Graduate Student Presentation will be given to a current or very recent graduate student who presents an outstanding talk based on their graduate work at the annual Evolution meeting. Finalists will present their talks during the live-streamed Hamilton Award symposium during the virtual part of the meeting June 27-28. The application to become a Hamilton award finalist will be part of registration for the virtual meeting.

Eligibility

PhD graduates who defended their PhD research after June 27, 2023, as well as current graduate students who have been enrolled in a graduate program for at least two (2) years, are eligible for this year’s competition. Note that the Hamilton competition is for dissertation research, and abstracts may not contain results arising from postdoctoral studies. Applicants must be members of SSE (learn more about SSE membership here and join here). Note that SSE members from eligible countries and territories can receive free meeting registration.

How to Apply

The application to become a Hamilton award finalist is part of registration for the virtual portion of the annual Evolution meeting. During registration, you must submit an abstract for your talk and check a box indicating your interest in the Hamilton Award competition.

Meeting registration is now open. Please submit your abstract and indicate your interest in this award by April 15, 2024. Finalists will be notified in mid May.
All virtual meeting participants, including Hamilton finalists, may present in both the virtual and in-person portions of the meeting. Applicants are welcome to submit the same or different talks to the virtual and in-person portions of the meeting, but only virtual talks can be entered into the Hamilton competition.

Apply now button

 

Selection

Finalists will present their research during the live-streamed Hamilton Award Symposium during the virtual part of the meeting (June 27-28). Talks will be recorded and available on the Evolution Meetings YouTube channel. Talks not selected for the Hamilton Award Symposium will be scheduled during regular virtual talk sessions. Check the meeting website for more information about how to prepare your talk.

The most competitive talks will be those that can convey a complete story. Such talks are most likely to be given by graduate students who are close to completing their dissertations or by former graduate students who wish to present results from a dissertation defended within the past year. Talks that primarily present preliminary data or just an initial part of a dissertation are not likely to be competitive, and we strongly suggest that those students wait to compete for this award. 

Winners will be selected and notified after the virtual portion of the Evolution meeting. 

 

Funding

The winner(s) of the award will each receive $1,000 US and a one-year membership to the Society for the Study of Evolution, which includes one year of access to the journal Evolution. Finalists will receive $500 US. Up to two Honorable Mentions will each also receive a one-year membership to the Society for the Study of Evolution, including access to Evolution

Recipients will be encouraged to submit an accompanying article to Evolution (primary research, review, insight or commentary, fast-tracked through review and made freely available) within 2 months of the meeting. 

Previous Award Recipients

Winners and runners-up listed below; winners are listed in bold text.

2023
Arielle Fogel, Duke University
James Gallagher, University of Denver

2022
Thomas Day, Georgia Institute of Technology
Cinnamon Mittan, Michigan State University

2021
Liming Cai, Harvard University
Sarah Khalil, Tulane University
Arianna Kuhn, American Museum of Natural History

2020
Due to the cancellation of the Evolution 2020 meeting, this award competition was not held in 2020.

2019
Michelle Stitzer, University of California, Davis. Advisor: Dr. Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra.
Sarah Friedman, University of California Davis. Advisor: Dr. Peter Wainwright.
Rachel Moran, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Advisor: Dr. Suzanne McGaugh.
Rachel Thayer, University of California, Berkeley. Advisor: Dr. Nipam Patel.

2018
Christopher D. Pull, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Supervisor: Dr. Sylvia Cremer.

Debora Goedert, Dartmouth College. Advisor: Dr. Ryan G. Calsbeek.
Karin van der Burg, Cornell University. Advisor: Dr. Robert Reed.

2017
Emily Behrman, University of Pennsylvania. Advisor: Dr. Paul Schmidt.

Jasmine Ono, Univ British Columbia. Advisor: Dr. Sally Otto.
Foen Peng, University of Washington. Advisor: Dr. H.D. 'Toby' Bradshaw.
Chathurani Ranathunge, Mississippi State. Advisor: Dr. Mark Welch.

2016
Nina Wale, Pennsylvania State University. Advisor: Dr. Andrew Read.

Amanda Gibson, Indiana University. Advisor: Dr. Curt Lively.
Jason Sardell, University of Texas at Austin. Advisor: Dr. Mark Kirkpatrick.

2015
Maude Baldwin, Harvard University. Advisor: Dr. Scott Edwards.
Sarah Fitzpatrick, Colorado State University. Advisor: Dr. Chris Funk.

Nathaniel Sharp, University of Toronto. Advisor: Dr. Aneil Agrawal.

2014
Daniel Field, Yale University. Advisor: Dr. Jacques A. Gauthier.

Benjamin Liebeskind, University of Texas, Austin. Advisors: Dr. David Hillis, Dr. Harold Zakon.
Megan Peterson, University of California, Santa Cruz. Advisor: Dr. Kathleen Kay.

2013
Emily Jacobs-Palmer, Harvard University. Advisor: Dr. Hopi Hoekstra.

Zoe Assaf, Stanford University. Advisor: Dr. Dmitri Petrov.
Matthew McGee, University of California, Davis. Advisor: Dr. Peter Wainwright.
Rebecca Satterwhite, University of Houston. Advisor: Dr. Tim Cooper.

2012
Christopher Martin, University of California, Davis. Advisor: Dr. Peter Wainwright.
Aleeza Gerstein, University of British Columbia. Advisor: Dr. Sally Otto.

Erin McCullough, University of Montana. Advisor: Dr. Doug Emlen.

2011
William Ratcliff, University of Minnesota. Advisor: Dr. R. Ford Denison.

Sarah Bodbyl Roels, University of Kansas. Advisor: Dr. John Kelly.
Christopher Oufiero, University of California at Riverside. Advisor: Dr. Theodore Garland, Jr.

2010 
Amanda Izzo, University of Michigan. Advisor: Dr. Elizabeth Tibbetts.

Benjamin Blackman, Duke University. Supervisors: Dr. John Willis and Dr. Daniel Rokhsar.
Christopher Martin, University of California – Davis. Advisor: Dr. Peter Wainwright.
David Lowry, University of Texas – Austin. Supervisor: Dr. Thomas Juenger.
Ian Wang, University of California – Davis. Advisor: Dr. Brad Shaffer.


View full page

From 2010-2017, SSE offered the Rosemary Grant Graduate Student Research awards to assist students in the early stages of their Ph.D. programs by enabling them to collect preliminary data (to pursue additional sources of support) or to enhance the scope of their research beyond current funding limits (e.g. by visiting additional field sites, or working at other labs). These awards were named for eminent evolutionary biologist Rosemary Grant for her strong mentorship and training of young evolutionary biologists.

In 2018, began offering a new award program for both early and advanced graduate students: the Graduate Research Excellence Grants.

View ALL Recipients:   2010  |  2011  |  2012  |  2013  |  2014  |  2015  |  2016 |  2017 


 

 

2017 Recipients

Amanda Benoit, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Advisor: Susan Kalisz
Catherine Chen, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. Advisor: Karin Pfennig
Marion Donald, Rice University. Advisor: Tom Miller
Ryan Dunk, Syracuse University. Advisor: Jason Wiles
Marie Fan, Monash University. Advisor: Anne Peters
Jimena Golcher-Benavides, University of Wyoming. Advisor: Catherine E. Wagner
Valentina Gomez, University of Illinois at Chicago. Advisor: Boris Igic
Kathryn Grabenstein, University of Colorado, Boulder. Advisor: Scott Taylor
Molly Hetherington-Rauth, University of Toronto Mississsauga. Advisor: Marc Johnson
Johanna Jantzen, University of Florida. Advisor: Pamela Soltis
Emily Kopania, University of Montana. Advisor: Jeffrey Good
Joseph McGirr, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. Advisor: Christopher Martin
Britany Morgan, Duke University. Advisor: Kathleen Donohue
Victoria Morgan, UC Davis. Advisor: Rick Grosberg
Nina Pak
, UC Berkeley. Advisor: Patrick O'Grady
Giulia Irene Maria Pasquesi, University of Texas at Arlington. Advisor: Todd Castoe
Anna Peschel, University of Minnesota. Advisor: Ruth Shaw
Alice Shanfelter, University of Georgia. Advisor: Michael White
Kum Shim, University of Texas at Austin. Advisor: Daniel Bolnick
Megan Smith, Ohio State University. Advisor: Bryan Carstens
Ana Mafalda Sousa Ferreira, University of Porto. Advisor: Jose Melo-Ferreira
Maria Stager, University of Montana. Advisor: Zachary Cheviron
Benjamin Stone, Ohio State University. Advisor: Andrea Wolfe
Benjamin Van Doren, University of Oxford. Advisor: Sonya Clegg
Michael Yuan, University of California, Berkeley. Advisor: Ian Wang
Linyi Zhang, Rice University. Advisor: Scott Egan
Serena Zhao, University of Texas at Austin. Advisor: Nancy Moran

 

2016 Recipients

Mallory A. Ballinger, University of California, Berkeley, Advisor: Michael W. Nachamn
Nassima M. Bouzid, University of Washington, Advisors: Adam Leaché and Lauren Buckley
Kinsey M. Brock, University of California, Merced, Advisor: Danielle Edwards
Sofia de la Serna Buzon, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Advisor: Karin Pfennig
Lauren Carley, Duke University, Advisor: Tom Mitchell-Olds
Allan Castillo, Duke University, Advisor: Mark D. Rausher
Abhilesh Dhawanjewar, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Advisors: Colin Meiklejohn and Kristi Montooth
Annette Evans, University of Connecticut, Advisors: Elizabeth Jockusch and Mark Urban
Micah Freedman, University of California, Davis, Advisors: Sharon Strauss and Santiago Ramirez
Joshua Goldberg, University of California, Riverside, Advisor: David N. Reznick
Julie A. Herman, University of California, Santa Cruz, Advisor: Kathleen Kay
Alex Van Huynh, Lehigh University, Advisor: Amber Rice
Kedar Karkare, University of Houston, Advisors: Ricardo Azevedo and Timothy Cooper
Sara M. Keeble, University of Southern California, Advisor: Matthew Dean
Christopher Krieg, University of Florida, Advisor: Emily Sessa
Holly C. McQueary, University of Georgia, Athens, Advisor: David Hall
Iva Popovic, University of Queensland, Advisor: Cynthia Riginos
Patrick Reilly, Princeton University, Advisor: Peter Andolfatto
Kathryn R. Ritz, Duke University, Advisor: Mohamed A. F. Noor
Ummat Somjee, University of Florida, Advisor: Christine W. Miller
Chelsea M. Stehle, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Advisor: William Wagner
Sebastian Stockmaier, University of Texas at Austin, Advisor: Daniel I. Bolnick
Syuan-Jyun Sun, University of Cambridge, Advisor: Rebecca Kilner
Andrew Taverner, Princeton University, Advisor: Peter Andolfatto
Eric Wesley Wice, Rice University, Advisor: Julia B. Saltz
Su’ad Yoon, University of Nevada Reno, Advisor: Matthew Forister


2015 Recipients

Christopher Akcali, University of North Carolina
Samantha Ray Anderson, University of Arizona
John Benning, Univeristy of Minnesota
Sarah Carey, University of Florida
Eleanor Caves, Duke University
Catherine Debban, University of Virginia
Katherine Eisen, Cornell University
Eslam Elshahat, Rice University
Nikki Forrester, Pittsburgh University
Phillip Grayson, Harvard University
Mike Hague, University of Virginia
Maggie Hantak, University of Ohio
Carl Hutter, University of Kansa
Brendan Larsen, University of Arizona
Joanna Larson, University of Michigan
Christopher Law, University of California, Santa Cruz
Whitley Lehto, University of Denver
Kellen Cedar Paine, University of New Mexico
Ahva Lynn Potticary, University of Arizona
Shelley Sianta, UC Santa Cruz
Laura Southcott, University of Chicago
Jennifer Valvo, Florida State University
Rebekah Villalta, Cornell University
Ryan Weaver, Auburn University
David Zonana, University of Colorado


2014 Recipients

Phred Benham, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Advisor: Dr. Zachary Cheviron
Amrita Bhattacharya, Indiana University, Advisor: Dr. Curtis M. Lively
Jennifer Coughlan, Duke University, Advisor: Dr. John Willis
Shane DuBay, University of Chicago, Advisor: Dr. Trevor D. Price
Jay Falk, Cornell University, Advisor: Dr. Kerry Shaw
Tamara Fetters, Virginia Tech, Advisor: Dr. Joel McGlothlin
Cera Fisher, University of Connecticut, Advisor: Dr. Elizabeth Jockusch
Andrew Frank, University of Connecticut, Advisor: Dr. Elizabeth Jockusch
Amanda Gorton, University of Minnesota, Advisors: Drs. David Moeller and Peter Tiffin
Nicolai Hensley, University of California, Santa Barbara, Advisor: Todd Oakley
Audrey Kelly, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Advisor: Dr. Karin Pfennig
Megan Kobiela, University of Minnesota, Advisor: Dr. Emilie Snell-Rood
Elizabeth LaRue, Purdue University, Advisor: Dr. Nancy Emery
Rishi R. Masalia, University of Georgia, Advisor: Dr. John M. Burke
Nicholas A. Mason, Cornell University, Advisor: Dr. Irby J. Lovette
W. Tyler McCraney, UCLA, Advisor: Dr. Michael Alfaro
Tim O'Connor, University of Arizona, Advisor: Dr. Noah Whiteman
Renee Petipas, Cornell University, Advisor: Dr. Monica Geber
Kathleen Pieper, University of Georgia, Advisor: Dr. Kelly Dyer
Pascal Olivier Title, University of Michigan, Advisor: Dan Rabosky
Laurel Yohe, SUNY Stony Brook University, Advisor: Dr. Liliana M. Davalos
Kelsey M. Yule, University of Arizona, Advisor: Dr. Noah K. Whiteman


2013 Recipients

Jeffrey R. Adrion, Indiana University, Advisor: Dr. Kristi L. Montooth
Alexandra Barnard, University of Oklahoma, Advisor: Dr. John P. Masly
Noelle Bittner, University of Arizona, Advisor: Dr. Michael Nachman
Daren C. Card, University of Texas at Arlington, Advisor: Dr. Todd A. Castoe
Danielle M. D'Amore, Ohio University, Advisor: Dr. Molly R. Morris
Jesse Delia, Boston University, Advisor: Dr. Karen Warkentin
Emily DiBlasi, University of Utah, Advisor: Dr. Sarah Bush
Danielle H. Drabeck, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Advisor: Dr. Sharon Jansa
Lauren A. Eserman, University of Georgia, Advisor: Dr. Jim Leebens-Mack
Nicholas K. Fletcher, Cornell University, Advisor: Dr. Jeremy Searle
Brian E. Gress, Syracuse University, Advisor: Dr. Scott Pitnick
Alexander S. Hall, University of Texas at Arlington, Advisor: Dr. Matthew Fujita
Karolina Heyduk, University of Georgia, Advisor: Dr. Jim Leebens-Mack
Scott Hotaling, University of Kentucky, Advisor: Dr. David Weisrock
Gaston I. Jofre, Texas A&M University, Advisor: Dr. Gil G. Rosenthal
Benjamin Johnson, Cornell University, Advisor: Dr. Kelly Zamudio
Karina Klonoski, University of California, Berkeley, Advisor: Dr. Erica Rosenblum
Hannah E. Marx, University of Idaho, Advisor: Dr. David Tank
Brianna McTeague, University of Arizona, Advisor: Dr. Katrina Dlugosch
David T. Peck, Cornell University, Advisor: Dr. Paul Sherman
Jordan D. Satler, Ohio State University, Advisor: Dr. Bryan Carstens
Amanda Schweitzer, City University of New York, Advisor: Dr. Ana Carnaval
Allison J. Shultz, Harvard University, Advisor: Dr. Scott V. Edwards
Richard K. Simpson III, Arizona State University, Advisor: Dr. Kevin McGraw
Sam Slowinski, Indiana University Bloomington, Advisor: Dr. Ellen Ketterson
Nicholas D. Sly, University of Illinois, Urbana‐Champaign, Advisor: Dr. Zac Cheviron
Jessica D. Stephens, University of Georgia, Advisor: Dr. Russell Malmberg
Maria Strangas, City University of New York, Advisor: Dr. Ana Carnaval
Brittany Lynne Sutherland, University of Virginia, Advisor: Dr. Laura F. Galloway
Andrew Swafford, University of California, Santa Barbara, Advisor: Dr. Todd Oakley
Rebecca Tarvin, University of Texas at Austin, Advisor: Dr. David Cannatella
James Patrick Tumulty, University of Minnesota, Advisor: Dr. Mark A. Bee


2012 Recipients

Danielle M. Adams, University of Maryland College Park, Advisor: Dr. Jerry Wilkinson
Nooria Al-Wathiqui, Tufts University, Advisor: Dr. Sara Lewis
Emily Louise Behrman, University of Pennsylvania, Advisor: Dr. Paul Schmidt
Vikram Bantwal Baliga, University of California, Santa Cruz, Advisor: Dr. Rita S. Mehta
Kristina L. Cohen, Boston University, Advisor: Dr. Karen Warkentin
Vincent R. Farallo, Ohio University, Advisor: Dr. Donald B. Miles
Amanda Gibson, Indiana University, Advisor: Dr. Curtis M. Lively
Amanda Hund, University of Colorado at Boulder, Advisor: Dr. Rebecca Safran
Jen-Pan Huang, University of Michigan, Advisor: Dr. L. Lacey Knowles
Ambika Kamath, Harvard University, Advisor: Dr. Jonathan B. Losos
Jonathan Lambert, Cornell University, Advisor: Dr. Kerry Shaw
Shea M. Lambert, Stony Brook University, Advisor: Dr. John J. Wiens
Joshua B. LaPergola, Cornell University, Advisors: Dr. Walter D. Koenig & Paul W. Sherman
Lauren Lucas, Texas State University, San Marcos, Advisor: Dr. Chris Nice
Rajiv McCoy, Stanford University, Advisor: Dr. Carol Boggs
Tristan A. McKnight, University of Michigan, Advisor: Dr. L. Lacey Knowles
Mauricio Montaño-Rendón, University of Sheffield, Advisor: Dr. Roger K. Butlin
Karan J. Odom, University of Maryland, Advisor: Dr. Kevin E. Omland
Matthew W. Pennell, University of Idaho, Advisor: Dr. Luke J. Harmon
Paulo C. Pulgarín-Restrepo, University of Los Andes, Advisor: Dr. Carlos Daniel Cadena
Marius Roesti, University of Basel, Advisor: Dr. Walter Salzburger
Molly Schumer, University of Princeton University, Advisor: Dr. Peter Andolfatto
Jenna M. Moore, University of California, San Diego, Advisor: Dr. Greg W. Rouse
Alyssa B. Stewart, University of Maryland, Advisor: Dr. Michele Dudash
Maggie R. Wagner, Duke University, Advisor: Dr. Thomas Mitchell-Olds


2011 Recipients

Gerardo Arceo‐Gómez,   University of Pittsburgh,  Advisor: Dr. Tia-Lynn Ashman
Lisa N. Barrow,   Florida State University,  Advisor: Dr. Emily Lemmon
Thomas D. Brekke,   University of Montana,  Advisor: Dr. Jeffrey Good
Sally Marie Chambers,   Purdue University,  Advisor: Dr. Nancy Emery
Gerardo Antonio Cordero,   Iowa State University,  Advisor:  Dr. Fredric Janzen
Rongfeng Cui,   Texas A&M University,  Advisor: Dr. Gil Rosenthal
James C. Cureton II,   University of Oklahoma,  Advisor: Dr. Richard E. Broughton
Kira Delmore,   University of British Columbia,  Advisor: Dr. Darren Irwin
Elizabeth M. Droge-Young,   Syracuse University,  Advisor: Scott Pitnick
Sarah W. Fitzpatrick,   Colorado State University,  Advisor: W. Christopher Funk
Elisabeth Jane Forrestel,   Yale University,  Advisor: Michael Donoghue
Chang Seok Han,   University of New South Wales,  Advisor: Robert Brooks
Rachel E. Hanauer,   Indiana University,  Advisor: Ellen D. Ketterson
Kayla M. Hardwick,   University of Idaho,  Advisor: Erica Bree Rosenblum
Sarah M. Hird,   Louisiana State University,  Advisor: Drs. Robb Brumfield, Bryan Carstens
Elizabeth J. Kleynhans,   University of British Columbia,  Advisor: Drs. Sarah Otto, Mark Vellend
Matthew H. Koski,   University of Pittsburgh,  Advisor: Tia-Lynn Ashman
Ezra Lencer,   Cornell University,  Advisor: Amy McCune
Chase Mason,   University of Georgia,  Advisor: Lisa Donovan
Alicia Mastretta­Yanes,   University of East Anglia,  Advisor: Dr Brent Emerson
George Andrew Meindl,   University of Pittsburgh,  Advisor: Tia-Lynn Ashman
Julie S. Miller,   Cornell University,  Advisor: H. Kern Reeve
Tara A Pelletier,   Louisiana State University,  Advisor: Bryan C Carstens
Rebecca H. Penny,   Indiana University,  Advisor: Lynda Delph
Cheryl Pinzone,   University of Georgia,  Advisor: Kelly Dyer
Diana Jessie Rennison,   University of British Columbia,  Advisor: Dolph Schluter
Leila Teruko Shirai,   Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Portugal,  Advisor: Dr. Patrícia Beldade
Angela Stathos,   University of Montana,  Advisor: Lila Fishman
Alexa R. Warwick,   Florida State University,  Advisor: Emily Moriarty Lemmon
Corlett Wolfe Wood,   University of Virginia,  Advisor: Edmund Brodie III
LengxobYong,   East Carolina University,  Advisor: Jeffrey S. McKinnon


2010 Recipients

Cheryl Marie Andam,   University of Connecticut
Chelsea Berns,   Iowa State University
Megan DeMarche,   Colorado State University
Eva Fischer,   Colorado State University
Andrew Furness,   University of California, Riverside
Emily Jacobs-Palmer,   Harvard University
Christopher Muir,   Indiana University, Bloomington
Carlos Prada,   Louisiana State University
Darren Rebar,   University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Benjamin Sandkam,   Simon Fraser University
Seema Sheth,   Colorado State University
Sonal Singhal,   University of California, Berkeley
Frank Smith,   University of Connecticut
Caitlin Smukowski,   Duke University
Kathryn Stewart,   Queen’s University
Katherine Stryjewski,   Boston University
Conor Taff,   University of California, Davis
Marjorie Weber,   Cornell University


View full page

The SSE International Committee (IC) mission is to foster international relationships between evolution societies and its members with particular focus on students and early-career scientists. The committee sponsors annually the International Travel Stipends for students and postdocs to attend the annual Evolution meeting, and the International Event Grants to fund events that foster international communication and collaboration. 

To contact the International Committee Chair, please email international [at] evolutionsociety.org. View the current committee membership.
 

Global Membership Assistance Program

The Global Membership Assistance (GMA) Program offers free or discounted membership to students, researchers, and educators in 152 countries and territories around the world based on World Bank classifications. Check the list of eligible countries to see if you are eligible. If you reside in one of the eligible countries, please request a discount code using this form. Discount codes can be used for any 1-year, 2-year, or 3-year membership type.

This year, SSE members residing in countries and territories eligible for the GMA Program are also eligible for free registration to the virtual portion of the Evolution meeting. Visit the Membership page to learn more.
 

SSE International Travel Stipends

These stipends support attendance at the in-person portion of the Evolution meeting for scientists at various stages of their professional career (e.g., Masters/PhD students, postdocs, and lecturers). You must be a member of the SSE. Those working in countries with high GDP are not eligible. For additional information and the application procedure, consult the Travel Awards page.

 
 


 

Text: Society for the Study of Evolution International Event Grants, Next deadline: 31 October.

International Event Grants

About

The goal of these grants is to foster communication and collaboration between scientists from different countries by sponsoring international symposia, workshops, courses, and other events within the field of evolutionary biology. Our priority is to support events that benefit emerging communities in the field of evolutionary biology. These grants replace the “Co-sponsorship of symposia organized by non-US based evolution societies” grants and the Evolution International Events Awards (EIE Awards).

 

Eligibility

  1. At least one organizer must be a member of SSE.*
  2. The topic of the event should relate to evolutionary biology and appeal to general SSE membership
  3. The timing of the event must not overlap with the annual Evolution meeting (typically in June)
  4. Preference will be given to events hosted outside of the US and in countries where evolutionary biology is emerging as a field of research; support for virtual events is also eligible.
  5. The council seriously considers diversity of participants and invited speakers as a criterion for selection.

Participants are not required to be members of SSE, but discounts in event registration costs for SSE members will be appreciated.

*Note that individuals at any career stage from 152 countries and territories are eligible for free or discounted SSE membership through the Global Membership Assistance Program.

In addition, the organizing recipients of this award will be invited to submit an accompanying article to Evolution, if appropriate (primary research, review, insight or commentary fast tracked through review and made freely available) within 2 months of the workshop. Published articles would highlight the grant funding obtained.
 
 

How to Apply

The application should be no more than 3 pages and include:

  1. Organizer names, affiliations, SSE membership, and contact details
  2. Event title, dates, and location
  3. A description of how the event will foster international communication and development of evolutionary biology, how it will favour diversity in this field of research, and how SSE funding will improve the event
  4. Names and affiliations of invited speakers, if applicable. Mention SSE membership if applicable.
  5. The name of the academic institution or research organization responsible for administering the award funds (reach out to the SSE Treasurer for questions at treasurer [at] evolutionsociety.org)
  6. Explanation of how participants will be selected
  7. A budget showing how SSE funds will be used, how funds from other sources will be used (if applicable), and the fee structure to participate in the events

In addition to the 3-page application, please include the CVs of the event organizers.

Please send applications and CVs as a single PDF document to the SSE International Committee Chair at international [at] evolutionsociety.org.

Deadline: October 31, 2023

View examples of previously funded events here and here.

 

Next Steps

Funded events should include an acknowledgement of SSE funding on the event website and/or printed material. We would also appreciate it if organizers share the benefits of becoming an SSE member with participants. 

Funded events must provide a short report to the SSE International Committee following the event. This report should include:

  • General overview of the event
  • Number of participants
  • Nationalities represented by participants and organizers
  • SSE wishes to evaluate what groups are underrepresented as direct/indirect recipients of its awards. If permitted under local jurisdiction, we would appreciate the report to include anonymized figures about representation (%) of self-reported gender, ethnicity, and/or any relevant categories among participants, who may suffer from unequal opportunities
  • Any material (e.g. pictures, links towards productions such as synthesis papers, or websites) to communicate around these events and their broader consequences and impact are also welcome.


View full page

Text: Tim Hartelt, 2024 Society for the Study of Evolution T. H. Huxley Award. Headshot of Tim Hartelt.

The SSE Huxley Award Committee is pleased to announce the winner of the 2024 T. H. Huxley Award, Tim Hartelt, PhD student advised by Dr. Helge Martens in the Department of Biology Education at the University of Kassel in Germany. Hartelt was selected for his educational resource, "Metaconceptual Learning Activities for Promoting Metacognitive Awareness and Self-Regulation of Intuitive Thinking in Evolution Education." In the activities, students actively engage with their intuitive thinking to develop an appropriate understanding of evolution. Learn more about the activity here, and read a recent paper by Hartelt and colleagues here. As part of the award, Hartelt will receive funding to present his work at the National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT) conference in November.

 

ABOUT | ELIGIBILITY | HOW TO APPLY | EVALUATION CRITERIA | AWARD | PREVIOUS RECIPIENTS

About

The SSE Education and Outreach Committee is pleased to announce the T. H. Huxley award, named in honor of Darwin's very public supporter T.H. Huxley, which recognizes and promotes the development of high quality evolution education resources. If you have an interesting project or educational activity to share, consider applying for this award. Graduate students and postdoctoral fellows are encouraged to apply. This award provides funding for an SSE member to present evolution education resources at an education-focused session or conference approved by the Huxley Committee (e.g., education session at the annual Evolution meeting or the annual National Association of Biology Teachers conference).

Examples of possible resources include classroom/museum activities, in-class or lab resources, podcasts, publications, websites, and videos. Competitive applications will be resources that include materials for student or audience engagement and assessment, not simply the presentation of information. All applications should include appropriate copyright and research permissions.

Eligibility

Applicants must be members of SSE. To join, visit https://payments.evolutionsociety.org/joinsse/

How to Apply

To apply, please complete this form.

Apply now button.

Deadline: February 1, 2024

Questions? Contact the Huxley Award Committee at huxleyaward@evolutionsociety.org.

Evaluation Criteria

The proposed project or resource must:

  • Communicate concepts in evolutionary biology to a broad audience
  • Provide guidelines for transferability and adoptability
  • Provide an interactive and accessible experience
  • Be age-appropriate for the intended audience
  • Have been previously assessed for educational effectiveness, such as pre and post evaluations of students or general audience; incorporation of feedback from instructors, students or other audience; post instructional surveys; etc

The following types of projects will not be considered:

  • Lectures
  • Collections of resources without supporting curriculum or educational effectiveness assessment

Priority will be given to materials that have been tested in multiple settings.

Award

The recipient will receive funding to present evolution education resources at an education-focused session or conference approved by the Huxley Committee (e.g., education session at the annual Evolution meeting or the annual National Association of Biology Teachers conference). Graduate student and postdoc awardees will receive a one-year membership as part of the award. A winner will be announced in early March. 
 

Previous Recipients


2023

Sarah Bordenstein
Discover the Microbes Within! The Wolbachia Project

Learn more about the project. 
 

2022

Not awarded.

2021

Dr. John Jungck and Dr. Sam Donovan
Beagle Investigations Return with Darwinian Data (BIRDD) project

Learn more about the project. 


2020

Erin L. McCullough, Lauren Verdeflor and colleagues Alaina Weinsztok, Jason R. Wiles, and Steve Dorus
Syracuse University & KIPP NYC College Prep High School
Exploratory activities for understanding evolutionary relationships depicted by phylogenetic trees: united but diverse

Read the paper describing the activity. 


2019

Brinda Govindan
San Francisco University
Bacterial Survivor 

Read the paper describing the activity here: https://evolution-outreach.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12052-017-0074-2


2018

Katie Grogan and colleagues Teresa W. Lee and Justine Liepkalns
Emory University
Making evolution stick: using sticky notes to teach the mechanisms of evolutionary change


Read the paper describing the activity here: https://evolution-outreach.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12052-017-0074-2


2017

Laura Bankers with Kyle McElroy, Joseph Jalinsky, James Woodell, Claire Adrian-Tucci, Katelyn Larkin, Robert Todd, Jorge Moreno, Dr. Emily Schoerning, and Dr. Maurine Neiman
National Center for Science Education Booster Clubs
Project website


2016

Amanda Gibson and Ariel Marcy 

Amanda Gibson, Evolution, Ecology and Behavior Department of Biology, Indiana University
Designed a hands-on game that requires students to collaborate to generate data and test predictions of the Red Queen Hypothesis.

Ariel Marcy - University of Queensland
Created Go Extinct! Players become zoologists competing to collect color –coded sets of closely related animal cards.


2015

Dr. Phil Gibson 
University of Oklahoma
How To Use Tree Thinking To Teach Plant Diversity and Evolution


2014

Dr. Jonathan Atwell,
Indiana University
Say Hello to the Junco! Teaching Evolution, Behavior, Genetics, and the Scientific Process with a Common Backyard Bird!


2013

Dr. William Ratcliff 
Georgia Tech
Yeast Experiment Hints at a Faster Evolution From Single Cells
Information on the awarded work: [1] [2] [3]



View full page

A cloudy mountain range. Text: Society for the Study of Evolution 2024 Small Grants for Local and Regional Outreach, Proposals due March 1.


About | Eligibility | How to Apply | Evaluation Criteria | AwardNext Steps | Previous Recipients
 

About

These grants provide support for local and regional educational outreach activities to take place during 2023. It is our hope that these projects will lead to ongoing outreach collaboration in future years. Preference will be given to new collaborations, but extensions of previous projects that have evidence of success are allowed. Proposals will be accepted until March 1, 2024.

Examples of past outreach activities have included public lectures, exhibits, student competitions, and professional development events for teachers. We especially encourage proposals that focus on discussing and implementing evolution education reforms recommended in the Vision & Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: Chronicling Change, Inspiring the Future report or on dialogues between undergraduate instructors and K-12 teachers around the new emphasis on evolution in the AP Biology Curriculum Framework and the Next Generation Science Standards. We look forward to your applications!
 

Eligibility

Applicants must be members of SSE, and are advised to join SSE, if not already members, as soon as possible to facilitate their applications. To learn more about Membership types and available discount programs, visit our Membership page.
 

How to Apply

  1. Proposal: Clearly but briefly state your plans in NO MORE THAN one single-spaced page.
  2. Amounts requested may be up to $1000 USD.  Include a short justification for the use of the funds.  Indicate any additional matching funds and include letters of commitment from collaborative partners.  
  3. Send your request by email attachment (subject heading 'SSE Outreach Grant 2024') to Barrie Robison (smallgrants [at] evolutionsociety.org).

DEADLINE: March 1, 2024
 

Evaluation Criteria

Applications will be ranked by an SSE Education Committee working group according to the following criteria:

  1. Does the activity explicitly deal with evolution and its concepts?
  2. Is there a clear plan for outreach?
  3. What is the overall impact of that outreach (i.e., number of participants, need for activity)?
  4. Is the budget reasonable and justified?

Award

Projects under $500 will receive funds when the award is given. For projects from $500 - $1000, the preference is to award the funds to the applicant's institution at the start of the project, with the applicant then being reimbursed from their institution. In exceptional circumstances when this is not possible, funds can be paid directly to the applicant upon completion of the project with submission of receipts. Indirect costs may not be charged to this award. Please email the SSE Treasurer at treasurer@evolutionsociety.org with questions.
 

Next Steps

We expect to fund in the range of 5-10 projects, with announcement of awards to take place in April. We look forward to your applications!

Recipients of this award will submit an accompanying report within two months of the activity. These may be highlighted in the SSE newsletter. All reports and associated talks should highlight the grant funding obtained.

Even if you are not interested in applying for funding from the SSE, we encourage you to engage through whatever means are at your disposal in opportunities to promote public understanding of evolutionary biology.

    

Previous Recipients

2022 

Andy Flick, Vanderbilt University
Telma Laurentino, University of California – Berkeley
Abigail Matela, University of Pittsburgh
Harshad Mayekar, Ahmedabad University
Manish Pathak, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata
Claire Williams, University of Texas - Austin

2021 

Haosu (Susu) Cong, Michigan State University
Lydia Greene, Duke University
Alexa Guerrara, Florida State University
Travis Hagey, Mississippi University for Women
Emily Lau, University of California – Santa Barbara
Sara Lipshutz, Indiana University - Bloomington
Pedro Taucce, Sao Paulo State University

2020 

Rebecca Brewer, Michigan State University
Travis Hagey, Mississippi University for Women
Angela Hung, Prairie State College
Javier Monzon, Pepperdine University
Barbora Trubenova, Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Matt Wilkins, Vanderbilt University
Kristin M. Winchell, Washington University
 

2019

Pauline Blaimont, Katherine Dale & Carla Sette - University of California, Santa Cruz
Grupo de Divulgación (Pía Pacheco, Dr. Eduardo Soto, Lic. Ángeles Arena, Lic. Valeria Arencibia, Lic. Martín Fasanelli, Lic. Lucas Kreiman, Lic. Fiona Puntieri, Martina Pernigotti, Alejandra Pérez, & Gonzalo Rodríguez Rizk) - Universidad de Buenos Aires
Abigail Hudak - Washington State University
Telma G. Laurentino et al. - Portuguese Association for the Teaching of the Blind
T. Mason Linscott & Christine E. Parent - University of Idaho
Jeanette Pirlo, Victor Perez, & Sean Moran - University of Florida, Florida Museum of Natural History
Stefanie Siller & Shailee S. Shah - Columbia University
Barbora Trubenova - Institute of Science and Technology Austria

2018

Claire Adrian-Tucci - NCSE 
Idalia C. Rojas Barrera - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Mattheau Comerford - Rice University 
Reese Fulgenzi - University of Virginia 
Carlos Guarnizo - Ciencia Café Pa Sumerce 
Scott Hotaling; et al - Washington State University 
Stacy Krueger-Hadfield; Sarah Adkins - Univ of Alabama at Birmingham 
Andrew Larson - Columbus Signature Academy New Tech High School
Maria Pilar Herrera - Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos 
Molly Selba - Univ of Florida 
Rohini Singh; Erin Doody & Melina Gyaparki - Univ. of Pennsylvania 
Melanie Smee - Cornell Univ. 
Sheela Turbek - Univ. of Colorado, Boulder 
Ghada Yousif; Sara Mitri; Khaled Elsayed 

2017

Logan Cole - Indiana University
Nicole Freidenfields - Tolland Public Schools
Joseph Jalinsky - University of Iowa
Harald Parzer - Fairleigh Dickinson University
Jon Perry - Stated Clearly
Todd Pierson - University of Tennessee Knoxville
Matthew Rubin - Syracuse University
Molly Martell - University of Florida

2016

Henry Arenas-Castro & Wendy Valencia - Colombian Network for Evolutionary Biology
Larry Bowman & Daniel MacGuigan - Yale University
Cory Kohn & Mike Wiser - Michigan State University
Chris Torres - University of Texas - Austin
Marco Cocito-Monoc - LSU Museum of Natural Science
Riley Graham - University of Pennsylvania
Nicole Gunter - Cleveland Museum of Natural History
Liz Landis - Tufts University
Kathryn Massana - University of Tennessee - Knoxville
Robin Tinghitella - University of Denver
Eric Wice - Rice University
Su'ad Yoon - University of Nevada - Reno
Alex Berry - University of Pennsylvania Alex Hall - University of Texas - Arlington

2014-2015

Christopher Balakrishnan & Dustin Foote - East Carolina University
Emily Behrman - University of Pennsylvania
Kevin Burls & Cynthia Scholl - University of Nevada, Reno
Theodore Garland - University of California, Riverside
Jacqualine Grant - Southern Utah University
Eric Meikle - National Center for Science Education
John Niedzwiecki - Belmont University
EEB Program Graduate Students - Rice University
Beatriz Otero-Jimenez - University of Michigan
Catherine Peichel & Carole Tanner - Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
William Ratcliff - Georgia Tech University
Stanley Rice - Southeastern Oklahoma State University
Stacey Smith - University of Colorado
Mehmet Somel - Middle East Technical University
Angela Stathos - University of Montana
Eric von Wettberg - Florida International University
Jennifer Weber - Fordham University
Emily Weigel - Michigan State University

2012-2013

Kaitlin Bonner - Oregon State University, OR, USA
Dale Broder - Colorado State University , CO, USA
Sarah Fitzpatrick - Colorado State University , CO, USA
Dr. Andrea Gloria-Soria - Yale University, CT, USA
John T. Lovell - Colorado State University, CO, USA
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan - Michigan State University, MI, USA
Dr. Muaro Mandriolo - University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, ITALY
Julia Spalding-Beegles - Denver Museum of Nature & Science, CO, USA

 

2011

Dr. Paula Cushing - Denver Museum of Natural History, CO, USA
Kevin Deitz - Texas A&M University, TX, USA
Sarah Eddy - Oregon State University, OR, USA
Dr. Norman Johnson - University of Massachusets, MA, US
David Kikuchi - University of North Carolina, NC, USA
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan - Michigan State University, MI, USA
Dr. Emilie Snell-Rood - University of Minnesota, MN, USA
Dr. Philip Barnes - Connecticut College, CT, USA

2010

Dr. Clement Kent - York University, Ontario, CANADA
Dr. Levi Morran - Indiana University, IN, USA 
Aman Gill - Stony Brook University, NY, USA
Dr. Jim Smith - Lyman Briggs College, MI, USA
Alexandra Sá Pinto and Dr. Rita Campos - CIBIO-UP (ICETA), PORTUGAL

 
2009 

Dr. Juan Arroyo - Universidad de Seville, SPAIN
Dr. Luciano Javier Avila - Centro Nacional Patagonico, ARGENTINA
Dr. Alex Badyaev - University of Arizona, AZ, USA
Dr. Peter Berendzen - University of Northern Iowa, IA, USA
Dr. Paula Cushing - Denver Museum of Nature & Science, CO, USA
Dr. Dany Garant - Université de Sherbrooke. Quebec, CANADA
Dr. Root Gorelick - Carleton University, Ontario, CANADA
Dr. Stephen Heard - University of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, CANADA
Dr. Valentina Islas - University of St Andrews, UNITED KINGDOM
Dr. Christopher Ivey - California State University, CA, USA
Kimberley Kandros - North Carolina Museum of Natural Science, NC, USA
Dr. Jeremy Kirchman - New York State Museum, NY, USA
Dr. Richard Kliman - Cedar Crest College, PA, USA
Dr. Sophie Lardy - Société Écologique à Responsabilité Limitée, FRANCE
Dr. Enrique Lessa - Universidad de la República, URUGUAY
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan - Michigan State University, MI, USA
Tara Maginness - St Edwards University, TX, USA
Dr. Louise Mead - National Centre for Science Education, CA, USA
Dr. Francesc Mestres - Universitat de Barcelona, SPAIN
Dr. John Niedzwiecki - Belmont University, TN, USA
Erik Pietrowicz - University of Southern Maine, ME, USA
Dr. Margaret Ptacek - Clemson University, SC, USA
Dr. Rosie Redfield - University of British Columbia, British Columbia, CANADA
Dr. Ingo Schlupp - University of Oklahoma, OK, USA
Dr. Antonio Guillén - Servent Instituto de Ecología, A. C., MEXICO
Dr. Nancy Staub - Gonzaga University, WA, USA
Dr. Richard Thomas - Southern Illinois University, IL, USA
Dr. Lisa Wallace - Mississippi University, MI, USA


View full page

View full page

Post A Position           

» Post-doctoral Research Fellow, Plant & Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
» Post-doctoral Scholar in Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
» Postdoc position in Caribbean biogeography and phylogenetics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada
» Visiting Instructor - Biological Sciences, Post-doctoral Fellow, State University of New York at Old Westbury, Old Westbury, NY, USA
» Postdoctoral Scientist - "Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology in a Primate Model",  Department of Anthropology and the Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
» PhD Graduate Student, Research Assistant, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
» Postdoctoral Researcher Fellow, Evolutionary Ecology and/or Evolutionary Genetics, Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
» Postdoc/Staff Scientist in Fish Biodiversity, Macroevolution Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna, Okinawa, Japan
» PhD position on parental effects and transgenerational plasticity of fat metabolism, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium
» Non-Tenure-Track Teaching Assistant Professor or Instructor, Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
» Post-doctoral Research Fellow, Evolutionary Genomics, Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
» Postdoc or Staff Scientist in Macroevolution, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST), Onnason, Okinawa, Japan
» Non-Tenure-Track Assistant Professor of Practice, School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
» Tenure-Track Assistant Professor, Vertebrate Anatomy, Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA
» Post-doctoral Research and Teaching Fellow, Evolutionary Genetics, Biology Department, Augustana University, South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
» Tenure-Track Assistant Professor of Evolutionary Biology, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
» Tenure-Track Assistant Professor, Evolutionary Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
» Tenure-Track Assistant Professor in Genes, Genomes, and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
» Tenure-Track Assistant Professor, Faculty Position in Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
» Chairperson, Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

 

 

Note: SSE does not endorse nor investigate job ads submitted to this website.
 
 

Title: Postdoctoral Scholar
Position Type: Post-doctoral Research Fellow
Institution: University of California, Berkeley
Department: Plant & Microbial Biology
Field: Plant Ecological Genomics
City: Berkeley, CA, USA

General Information: The Plant & Microbial Biology Department at the University of California, Berkeley seeks applications for a Postdoctoral Scholar in the Blackman Lab, in the area of plant ecological genomics, at 100% time, with an anticipated start in summer or fall 2024. 

Applying tools from evolutionary genomics, molecular genetics, and field ecology in sunflowers and monkeyflowers, our research addresses the following questions: How do plants cope with daily and seasonal environmental fluctuations? How and why do these responses evolve along environmental gradients? How are multi-trait adaptations assembled over evolutionary time?

The Position:

The postdoc will contribute to current NSF-funded work in the lab that seeks to understand the diversity of mechanisms by which natural populations of monkeyflowers have adapted to historic and contemporary drought stress using a combination of population genomics, transcriptomics, resurrection experiments, and genome editing. The aims of the position will be tailored to the expertise of the successful applicant and complement the Blackman Lab's broad interests in the genetic basis of adaptation and domestication, the ecology and evolution of plant development, and mechanisms of organism-environment interaction.

Job Location:
Berkeley, CA

UC Berkeley is committed to diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging. The excellence of the institution requires an environment in which the diverse community of faculty, students, and staff are welcome and included. Successful candidates will demonstrate knowledge and skill related to ensuring equity and inclusion in the activities of their academic position (e.g., teaching, research, and service, as applicable).

The University of California, Berkeley is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, age, or protected veteran status. For the complete University of California nondiscrimination and affirmative action policy see: http://policy.ucop.edu/doc/4000376/NondiscrimAffirmAct

In searches when letters of reference are required all letters will be treated as confidential per University of California policy and California state law. Please refer potential referees, including when letters are provided via a third party (i.e., dossier service or career center), to the UC Berkeley statement of confidentiality prior to submitting their letter.

As a University employee, you will be required to comply with all applicable University policies and/or collective bargaining agreements, as may be amended from time to time. Federal, state, or local government directives may impose additional requirements.

Qualifications: Basic Qualifications

(By application date):
PhD (or equivalent international degree) or enrolled in a PhD (or equivalent international degree) program.

Additional Qualifications
(By start date):
PhD (or equivalent international degree) required by the appointment start date.
No more than 2 years of post-degree research experience by start date.

Preferred qualifications

-Demonstrated expertise in evolutionary and ecological genomics.
-Expertise in analysis of genomic or transcriptomic datasets.
-Programming for bioinformatics, biostatistics, image analysis, machine learning.
-Plant physiological ecology, GWAS, genome editing, or gene expression studies.
-Excellent writing and communication skills.

Responsibilities: The postdoc will work closely with the PI, collaborators, and lab personnel to design and lead research in the lab and field on the genetics and ecology of natural variation in drought resistance strategies in the common monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. The position also involves preparing grant proposals and manuscripts, data management and dissemination, organization and content development for workshops with land managers, and mentoring graduate and undergraduate students. The ideal candidate will demonstrate the ability to integrate across biological disciplines, identify and troubleshoot promising new methodologies independently, and use the appointment to develop and pursue novel, exciting questions.

Instructions: To Apply:
Visit: https://aprecruit.berkeley.edu/JPF04404 

Specific questions regarding the recruitment can be directed to bkblackman@berkeley.edu

APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

Document requirements

Curriculum Vitae - Your most recently updated C.V.
Cover Letter

Reference requirements
3 required (contact information only)

Compensation: Appointment: The initial appointment will be at 100% time for two years with the possibility of extension based on satisfactory performance and availability of funding.  Salary and Benefits:  Salary will be commensurate with qualifications and experience and based on UC Berkeley Postdoctoral salary scale. Generous benefits are included https://vspa.berkeley.edu/postdocs
Contact: Benjamin Blackman, bkblackman@berkeley.edu
Web Link: https://aprecruit.berkeley.edu/JPF04404
Review Starts: 4/19/2024
Application Closes: 5/5/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Post-doctoral Scholar in Ecology
Position Type: Post-doctoral Research Fellow
Institution: University of California, Davis
Department: VM:PMI
Field: Ecology
City: Davis, CA, USA

General Information: The Vector Genetics Laboratory (VGL) at the University of California, Davis is seeking applications for a post-doctoral research scholar position in the area of MOSQUITO ECOLOGY. The VGL is dedicated to research and training in the areas of population & molecular genetics, genomics and bioinformatics of insect vectors of human and animal disease. The VGL research agenda is aimed at expanding knowledge that may be applied to improving control of disease vectors and at the same time addresses problems of interest in the field of evolutionary genetics. The VGL has links to multiple Graduate Groups and Centers on the UC Davis campus, including the Center for Population Biology, Department of Evolution and Ecology and the One Health Institute. Find out more about the VGL at: https://vectorgeneticslab.ucdavis.edu/ 

Background:

The VGL is a member of the University of California Malaria Initiative (UCMI) which is a collaborative group comprised of members from four UC campuses (UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UC Irvine, and UC San Diego) plus Johns Hopkins University. UCMI researchers have proposed and developed a cost-effective, sustainable, and environmentally responsible strategy for the eradication of human malaria from Africa. This strategy is based on genetically modifying populations of the mosquito that transmits malaria by introducing two genes that encode products that destroy the malaria parasite as it develops in the mosquito vector. These anti-parasite genes are coupled with a Cas9-based gene drive which facilitates their introduction and spread through natural populations. The objective is elimination of malaria transmission by elimination of the parasite within the mosquito but not the mosquito itself. Details about UCMI may be found on our website, https://stopmalaria.org/ 

The VGL’s role in UCMI is to conduct field trials of the modified mosquitoes. The island nation of São Tomé and Príncipe (STP) was ultimately identified as an ideal field site. These two oceanic islands are located in the Gulf of Guinea, roughly 300 kilometers off the coast of west Africa. The VGL project has a team of mosquito biologists and state-of-the-art laboratory and insectary facilities on-site in STP where field and laboratory research has been ongoing since 2019. In addition, we have a very large local team of community and stakeholder engagement workers.

Project Description:

The Mosquito Ecology post-doc will be part of a project that is focused on the ecology and genetics of populations of the primary malaria vector, Anopheles coluzzii and species with which this mosquito interacts on São Tomé and Príncipe islands. The goal of the ecology project is to assess the impact of introducing genetically engineered An. coluzzii both on natural populations of this species as well as potential impacts on non-target species with which An. coluzzii may interact. The Mosquito Ecologist will interact with our mathematical modeling and population genomics groups, and it is hoped that these interactions will synergize the individual work of each group.

Qualifications: Candidate qualifications include the following: (i) quantitative methods in ecology, (ii) experience in conducting field work, (iii) leading field collection teams, (iii) the application of genetic markers for species identification, insecticide resistance genes, blood-meal analysis, etc. The post-doc filling this position should be willing to work as part of an interdisciplinary team and should have experience or interest in one or more of the following: landscape ecology/genetics, island biogeography, population genomics, bioinformatics, and/or mathematical modeling.

Support is available for 2 years, starting not later than May 20, 2024.

Responsibilities: Job Description:

We are seeking a person with a strong background in quantitative ecology, an interest in island ecology and experience in conducting field work. The Mosquito Ecologist will be responsible for providing leadership in the conduct of all field work. He/she should be capable of dealing with the logistical challenges often faced while conducting field work in the tropics and be capable of managing field collection teams. The effort at each field site will include intensive collection of adult and larval An. coluzzii, sampling and identification of non-target macro- and microorganisms sharing the aquatic environment with An. coluzzii, identifying collection sites and scheduling field collection work. On return to the lab at Davis the mosquito ecologist will be responsible for DNA extraction and utilization of established molecular methods to: (i) identify Plasmodium infected individuals, (ii) identify insecticide resistance genotypes, and (iii) identify blood meal sources. We have developed multiplex molecular assays for this work.

The Mosquito Ecologist will be working as part of an interdisciplinary team that includes expertise in population genetics, molecular genetics, genomics, bioinformatics, mathematical modeling and the acquisition and analysis of remotely sensed data. The team is located across the University of California system including UC Irvine, UC Berkeley, UC San Diego and of course UC Davis. The person filling this position will be based at the Vector Genetics Laboratory at UC Davis. The candidate should be available to spend periods of up to 3 months at a time in the field.

Instructions: How to apply:

Applicants should submit the following materials:

- A cover letter
- A curriculum vitae
- List of relevant publications
- Contact information for 3 referees

Send the above combined into a single PDF to lab admin at cmhandy@ucdavis.edu with the subject line “Ag02-Mosquito Ecology”

This position will remain open until filled, but candidates able to start on or before May 20, 2024 will be given preference. This is a 2 year position with the possibility of extension pending funding.

The University of California has implemented a SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccination Program SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Policy (ucop.edu) covering all employees.  To be compliant with the policy, employees must submit proof of vaccination or a University-approved exception or deferral.

The University of California is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer advancing inclusive excellence.  All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, age, protected veteran status, or other protected categories covered by the UC nondiscrimination policy.

Compensation: $64,480 – $71,908 contingent on candidate experience
Contact: Christine, cmhandy@ucdavis.edu
Web Link: https://vectorgeneticslab.ucdavis.edu/news/
Review Starts: 4/10/2024
Application Closes: 5/20/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Postdoc position in Caribbean biogeography and phylogenetics
Position Type: Post-doctoral Research Fellow
Institution: Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada
Department: Biology
Field: Biogeography and Phylogenetics
City: St. John's, Canada

General Information: We are searching for a postdoc to be part of a new project entitled “Subduction Triggered Terrestrial Evolution in the Caribbean” (SUBUTTEC) funded by the French Agence National de la Recherche and the Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. The project aims at combining biological and geological data to understand how changes in landmasses and seas induced the evolution of plants and animals using the Caribbean islands as a case study. We are particularly interested in understanding the evolution of life in archipelagoes located along subduction zones. This project brings together an international team of academics mostly from France but also from Germany, the Netherlands, Canada, and Mexico. The researchers are grouped into four working packages (WP) with the following objectives: WP1 will conduct phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses of Caribbean plants and animals. WP2 will conduct geological mapping, date emersion surfaces, quantify erosion rates and surface uplift to provide a chronology for land emergence and drowning during the last 30 million years. WP3 will conduct numerical modeling of the vertical motions that control the land-sea mask to unravel the triggers and amplitude of the emersion and drowning events. The biological and geological results will be merged in WP4 testing alternative hypotheses of organisms’ dispersal and evolution. The postdoc will be integrated into WP1 and WP4 and will work under the supervision of Dr. Julissa Roncal at Memorial University of Newfoundland in Canada. 

  • Start date and location: September 2024 in St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
  • Position duration: 2 years with a possibility of a 1-year extension

Qualifications: Ph.D. degree completed

  • Demonstrated knowledge on phylogenetics/genomics and/or biogeographic modeling
  • Excellent writing skills. 
  • Some experience programming in languages such as Perl, Python, or R
  • Experience managing large datasets

Responsibilities: Using published dated phylogenies, the postdoc will conduct a meta-analysis of plant colonization and speciation events in the Caribbean through time. Will work in close collaboration with a PhD student and another postdoc. We are interested in seeing patterns partitioned by dispersal mode, plant habit (trees versus shrubs), and inter-island migrations. 

  • Lead a case study of the Antillean species in the genus Sloanea (Elaeocarpaceae). There are 9 native Sloanea species in the Greater and Lesser Antilles for which we would like to reconstruct their history of colonization, and linking with land emergence and drowning findings from WP2. Fieldwork in the Caribbean and/or continental America will be necessary. Other case studies of interest to the postdoc could be addressed as long as they are within Caribbean biogeography. 
  • Assist with the development of GEN3SIS eco-evolutionary models within WP4, which will predict the evolution of the biosphere upon prescribed paleogeographic and paleoclimatic reconstructions.
  • Co-supervision of PhD, MSc and undergraduate students.
  • Write research reports for NSERC and peer-reviewed publications in collaboration with supervisor and other partners.
  • Dissemination of research to scientists, the general public, government, land managers, etc through presentations or lay publications.

Instructions: Please send an academic CV, a statement of research interests and career goals, three references (contact information only) and a sample peer-reviewed publication into a single pdf to Dr. Julissa Roncal: jroncal@mun.ca. Only postdocs who are short listed will be contacted for a remote interview. Applications will be reviewed continuously until the position is filled.

The department of Biology at Memorial University has 29 faculty members and over 100 graduate students. Memorial University is Atlantic Canada’s largest university offering a multicultural environment. Individuals from traditionally underrepresented groups in science (e.g.women, people of colour, people with disabilities, 2SLGBTQ+) are encouraged to apply.

Compensation: 50,000-60,000 CAD/year plus 20% benefits
Contact: Julissa Roncal, jroncal@mun.ca
Web Link: https://julissaroncal.wordpress.com/2024/02/23/postdoc-position-in-caribbean-biogeography/
Review Starts: 3/1/2024
Application Closes: 5/30/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Visiting Instructor - Biological Sciences
Position Type: Post-doctoral Fellow
Institution: State University of New York at Old Westbury
Department: Biological Sciences
Field: Evolution
City: Old Westbury, NY, USA

General Information: The Biological Sciences Department at the State University of New York at Old Westbury is seeking applications for a PRODiG+ Fellow starting Fall 2024.  PRODIG+ Fellowships are two (2) year non-renewable contracts with competitive compensation that fund late-stage pre-doctoral (ABD), post-doctoral, and other terminal degree students.  This Fellowship will provide teaching experience at our campus, faculty mentorship, funding for professional development as well as a stipend for summer research, and support for networking and attending yearly PRODiG conferences.  For more information about this program please see https://www.suny.edu/prodig/fellowship/

Candidates must have or be near completion of a Ph.D. in Biology or a related field, with a specialization in Evolution.  We seek a candidate who is committed to liberal arts education and can demonstrate excellence in teaching and research while working with a culturally diverse student population.

Qualifications: Required Qualifications:

Have completed a Ph.D. degree or relevant terminal degree from an accredited institution completed prior to August 2024 in Biology or a related field, preferably in Evolution.
Be eligible to work in the United States without a visa sponsorship.
Demonstrate personal, academic, and/or work experience engaging with diversity, equity, and inclusion and/or a commitment to facilitating and enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in the campus community.

Preferred Qualifications:

Demonstrated knowledge of evidence-based teaching approaches.
Experience teaching undergraduate biology courses.
Experience teaching a culturally diverse undergraduate student population.
Experience mentoring undergraduate students in research.
Demonstrated plan to integrate your research into the curriculum.
Currently funded research and/or a record of successful grantsmanship.

Responsibilities: Responsibilities include teaching undergraduate and graduate (at the Masters level) courses in Evolution, Introductory Biology courses, and other upper-division courses. The candidate will be expected to pursue their scholarship and involve undergraduate students in research. Involvement in college service is also expected.

Instructions: Please submit the following online at https://oldwestbury.interviewexchange.com/jobofferdetails.jsp?JOBID=173389   

  1. letter of application,
  2. curriculum vitae,
  3. Submit an essay, in 750 words or less, to the following essay prompt:

"Please describe how you've engaged, facilitated, and/or enhanced diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in the campus community. Examples could include personal, academic, and/or work experience and may include, but is not limited to, an academic/scholarly track record focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion; work, volunteer/unpaid/ community service; or related experience/ expertise in serving underserved or vulnerable areas and/or populations."

Applications submitted without an essay will not be considered.

  1. statement of teaching philosophy,
  2. description of research interest,
  1. contact information (name, email address and telephone number) for three references and,
  2. a fully completed Old Westbury employment application (available during the online application process).

Only applications submitted online will be considered.

CLOSING DATE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATIONS:  Open until filled.

VISA sponsorship is not available for this position.

We encourage protected veterans, individuals with disabilities, women and minorities to apply.

Employment in this position will be contingent on the College's verification of credentials and any other information required by federal or state law, and SUNY Old Westbury policies, including the completion of pre-employment screening.

Compensation: $65,000.00 (plus location pay $3,087.00) and comprehensive benefits package
Contact: Lillian Colella, HR@oldwestbury.edu
Web Link: https://oldwestbury.interviewexchange.com/jobofferdetails.jsp?JOBID=173389
Review Starts: 3/18/2024
Application Closes: 6/14/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Postdoctoral Scientist - "Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology in a Primate Model"
Position Type: Post-doctoral Research Fellow
Institution: The George Washington University
Department: Department of Anthropology and the Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology
Field: Evolutionary Neuroscience
City: Washington, DC, USA

General Information: We are seeking a Postdoctoral Scientist to join The George Washington University's Laboratory for Evolutionary Neuroscience for an NIH-funded project on "Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology in a Primate Model.” Learn more about us: https://cashp.columbian.gwu.edu/evolutionary-neuroscience

Qualifications: Qualified candidates will hold a Doctoral degree or comparable doctoral degree in a related discipline. Degree must be conferred by the start date of the position.

Responsibilities: Conduct interdisciplinary comparative research on great ape and human brains to investigate aging and pathology of synapses and mitochondria using electron microscopy and other methods.

Instructions: Apply Now: https://www.gwu.jobs/postings/109110 

Contact: Chet Sherwood, sherwood@gwu.edu
Web Link: https://www.gwu.jobs/postings/109110
Review Starts: 3/21/2024
Application Closes: 5/1/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: PhD Graduate Student
Position Type: Research Assistant
Institution: Michigan Technological University
Department: Biological Sciences
Field: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
City: Houghton, MI, USA

General Information: PhD Student Opportunity to Join Dr. Erika Hersch-Green’s Research Group in Plant Evolutionary Ecology at Michigan Technological University

I am looking for a graduate student that would like to contribute to research that is examining how plant genome size variation influences the structuring of biodiversity patterning from molecular levels to multispecies communities. Specifically, research will examine how genome size affects plant functional attributes, plant species interactions (with antagonists and mutualists) and responses to global change factors.

Qualifications: Qualifications:

  • Required: (1) A MS in the fields of ecology or evolutionary biology or a closely related discipline. (2) Prior work experience in a field setting OR with molecular/transcriptome work. (3) Good (demonstrable) English scientific writing skills. (4) Ability to work well independently and as part of a team. (5) Commitment to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion.
  • Desired: (1) Good quantitative/statistics background. (2) Interest in community outreach. (3) A US driver’s license upon starting.

Responsibilities: Position Details:

  • With guidance from Dr. Hersch-Green, student will lead the development of their specific research questions and projects based upon their specific interests.
  • Student will have opportunities to:
  1. conduct experiments in lab, greenhouse, and/or field settings (https://youtu.be/H6MtEnAIyi0),
  2. collaborate with national and international scientists (see: https://nutnet.org/home, https://dragnetglobal.weebly.com/),
  3. participate in outreach and scientific communication activities,
  4. work with a fun, supportive lab group to foster an equitable learning environment for everyone. 
  • The anticipated start date Summer or Fall 2024.
  • Funding (including tuition) in the form of graduate research and teaching assistantships is included.

Instructions: Qualified and interested candidates should email Dr. Erika Hersch-Green (eherschg@mtu.edu) to express interest. In this email please include an updated CV and a statement of interest addressing required and desired qualifications and describing what area of research you are most interested in exploring and any previous experience in this area.  

Review of applications will begin April 1, 2024, at which time I will contact the most qualified candidates for virtual interviews. Individuals from traditionally excluded groups in science and higher education are encouraged to apply.

Compensation: Tuition and Stipend
Contact: Erika Hersch-Green, eherschg@mtu.edu
Review Starts: 2/29/2024
Application Closes: 5/1/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Postdoctoral Researcher Opportunity in Plant Evolutionary Ecology at Michigan Technological University
Position Type: Post-doctoral Research Fellow
Institution: Michigan Technological University
Department: Biological Sciences
Field: Evolutionary Ecology and/or Evolutionary Genetics
City: Houghton, MI, USA

General Information: I have funding for a Postdoctoral Researcher to join my lab group (Erika Hersch-Green) in the department of Biological Sciences at Michigan Tech University. The successful candidate will contribute to research in alignment with an NSF-funded project (link to full abstract), which aims to understand whether and how nutrient availabilities affect plants differently based upon their genome sizes and whether this contributes to the structuring of biodiversity patterns from the molecular and functional attributes of organisms to multispecies assemblages. Our field work is done locally (https://youtu.be/H6MtEnAIyi0) and in collaborations with national and international scientists (see: https://nutnet.org/home, https://dragnetglobal.weebly.com/).

Qualifications:

  • Required: (1) A Ph.D. in ecology, evolution, environmental science, molecular genetics, or a closely related field (completed before start date). (2) Experience in field biology and/or genomics research including bioinformatic skills. (3) Excellent writing, presentation, and statistical analysis skills and a publication record commensurate with time since degree completion.
  • Desired: (1) Experience mentoring students, managing dynamic projects and maintaining successful collaborations. (2) Clear communication skills, evidence of outreach and collaboration, and dedication to making science welcoming to everyone.

Responsibilities: Position Details

  • The postdoctoral researcher will be integrally involved in the design and implementation of transcriptome/greenhouse experiments and/or field experiments, data analysis and manuscript preparation of newly collected and back-logged data, presentations at conferences, collaborative workshops and discussions, mentoring of students, and outreach activities.
  • Our research group values diverse perspectives and a healthy work-life balance, and I am specifically looking for a postdoctoral researcher that will take work seriously and support and maintain a respectful, enjoyable environment for everyone. 
  • The anticipated start date is Summer or Fall 2024, but this is negotiable. 
  • The position is for 1 year with a potential extension up to 18 months and includes a minimum salary of $55,000 plus benefits.

Instructions: Application Procedures:  If you are qualified and interested in this opportunity, please contact Dr. Erika Hersch-Green via email (eherschg@mtu.edu) and include in a single PDF the following: (1) a cover letter summarizing research interests, professional experience, and career goals, (2) a CV including a complete list of publications, and (3) contact information for three professional references. Review of applications will begin March 15, 2024, and the position will remain open until filled. Individuals from traditionally excluded groups in science and higher education are encouraged to apply.

Compensation: Minimum salary of $55,000 plus benefits.
Contact: Erika Hersch-Green, eherschg@mtu.edu
Review Starts: 2/29/2024
Application Closes: 5/30/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Postdoc/Staff Scientist in Fish Biodiversity
Position Type: Post-doctoral Research Fellow
Institution: Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
Department: Macroevolution Unit
Field: Ichthyology (Evolution or Ecology)
City: Onna, Okinawa, Japan

General Information: A postdoctoral scholar (PhD <5 years) or staff scientist position (PhD >5 years) is available in the Macroevolution Unit at OIST. We seek a highly motivated, expert researcher with a deep knowledge of fish biodiversity, including but not limited to systematics, taxonomy, ecology., and the fossil record. The researcher will pursue groundbreaking projects on ichthyological topics, such as the origins of the Indo-Pacific biodiversity hotspot, the origins and diversification of fish groups, description and characterization of species and communities, and/or the influence of environmental and ecological factors on fish biodiversity. Exact projects will be developed through discussions with PI Sallan based on the skills, interests, and ideas of the selected researcher.

Qualifications: 1. PhD in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Marine Biology, Paleontology, Organismal Biology or related field with dissertation focused on fishes.

  1. Experience and interest in fish biodiversity.
  2. Willingness to develop knowledge about areas and clades of interest to the unit if outside of past experience (e.g. fishes).
  3. Willingness to learn new methods as needed.
  4. Willingness to travel to museum collections or collect specimens as needed.
  5. Willingness to collaborate with other relevant labs at OIST and outside.
  6. Good spoken and written English skills, including for scientific terms and concepts.

Responsibilities: 1. Develop and lead innovative projects related to the ichthyological interests of the Macroevolution Unit.

  1. Publish results in high-quality journals.
  2. Present at national and international conferences.

Instructions: Application instructions at: https://www.oist.jp/careers/postdoctoral-scholar-or-staff-scientist-ichthyology-macroevolution-unit 

Contact: Lauren Sallan, lauren.sallan@oist.jp
Web Link: https://www.oist.jp/careers/postdoctoral-scholar-or-staff-scientist-ichthyology-macroevolution-unit
Review Starts: 3/15/2024
Application Closes: 9/15/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: PhD position on parental effects and transgenerational plasticity of fat metabolism
Position Type: PhD position
Institution: University of Liège
Department: Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech - EvoEcoPhysio group
Field: Evolution and Ecophysiology
City: Gembloux, Belgium

General Information: We are looking for a highly motivated candidate to apply for a PhD position to be performed in the laboratory of Dr. Bertanne Visser (Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Belgium) in collaboration with Dr. Cécile Le Lann and Prof. Joan van Baaren (University of Rennes, ECOBIO, France). Funding is available to pay a salary for 1 year, during which the candidate is expected to apply for grants to fund a 4-year PhD project (e.g., Fonds National de Recherche FRIA and ASP calls). 

The Visser laboratory works on eco-evolutionary aspects of fat metabolism in parasitoids, particularly in the amber wasp Leptopilina heterotoma (see https://visserlab.be/). Recent findings on amber wasps revealed that fat synthesis can be switched on or completely off depending on the developmental environment. When sufficient fat can be carried over from the host, most wasps will stop synthesizing fat, but when only low quantities of fat can be obtained from the host, wasps will start synthesizing fat. During the first year of the project, the PhD student will be integrated in the laboratory to train and get experience with the model system and be part of ongoing research and experiments. 

Parasitoids are cornerstone species in ecological communities by regulating other insect populations. We are continuing to learn more about the intriguing fat physiology of parasitoids, but we have only little information as to how environmental changes in one generation impact future generations. Prof. van Baaren and Dr. Le Lann work on the effect of climate change on host-parasitoid interactions and particularly on plasticity and adaptation to temperatures. More erratic climatic conditions are becoming more prevalent and are expected to lead to indirect effects on host fat content, as well as direct effects on wasp fat metabolism (Le Lann et al., 2021). The candidate is expected to develop a research project on parental effects and transgenerational plasticity in response to reliable and unreliable variation in host fat content and temperature.

The ideal candidate for this position will have a strong background in ecology and evolution, as well as an interest in physiology. The candidate will be able to obtain skills in rearing and manipulating wasps and Drosophila hosts, physiological measurements (determining fat content, stable isotope tracing and analyzing fatty acid profiles obtained with mass spectrometry), planning and designing experiments, as well as writing and presenting research findings.

Qualifications: MSc degree

Responsibilities: Perform research and apply for national funding to complete a 4-year PhD program.

Instructions: Applications should be sent to Bertanne Visser (bertanne.visser@uliege.be) and must include 1) a statement of interest detailing why you are interested in the topic and working in the host laboratory; 2) a full CV; 3) a list of grades obtained during the master’s degree, and; 4) Contact details of at least 2 referees.

Contact: Bertanne Visser, bertanne.visser@uliege.be
Web Link: https://visserlab.be/join-my-lab/
Review Starts: 2/24/2024
Application Closes: 7/1/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Teaching Assistant Professor or Instructor
Position Type: Non-Tenure-Track Teaching Assistant Professor or Instructor
Institution: Kansas State University
Department: Division of Biology
Field: Evolution and Organismal Biology
City: Manhattan, KS, USA

General Information: The Division of Biology at Kansas State University is currently seeking a full-time Instructor (title may vary based on degree and credentials) to teach undergraduate classes beginning August 2024.

Qualifications: Minimum Qualifications:

  • M.S. in biological sciences
  • Experience in biological science instruction at the community college, college, or university level.
  • Demonstrated commitment to mentoring students and to serving a diverse population.
  • Must be motivated and ambitious and possess excellent communication skills and a foundational understanding of the principles of active learning.
  • Must be able to work in a collegial manner with students and colleagues in a large, modern, and diverse university setting.

Preferred Qualifications:

  • Ph.D. or equivalent in biological sciences

Other Requirements:

  • Applicants must be currently authorized to work in the United States at the time of employment.

Responsibilities: The successful applicant will be responsible for solo or co-delivery of 5-6 classes per academic year in the areas of, but not limited to, evolutionary biology, organismal biology, and introductory biology using state-of-the-art technology and active learning principles. Organismal biology courses taught by the Instructor may focus on taxon-specific disciplines (e.g. ichthyology, mammalogy). This position is for the nine-month academic year; opportunities exist for additional course delivery in the summer semester. Instructional responsibilities include classroom, laboratory, and online instruction, laboratory setup, preparation and maintenance of syllabi and other class materials, evaluation of student competence, assessment of student mastery of Division of Biology and university learning objectives, and preparation of student progress and grade reports. Other responsibilities will include academic advising, participation in campus events such as open houses, student award ceremonies, and graduation ceremonies. Opportunities for mentoring undergraduate research projects may also be available.

Instructions: For more information on the position and to apply please visit the site below.  

https://careers.k-state.edu/en-us/job/516769/instructor     

The following documents are required to apply:

  • Cover letter
  • Curriculum vitae
  • Brief description of instructional interests
  • Statement of teaching experience and philosophy
  • Teaching evaluations or other evidence demonstrating excellence in undergraduate instruction
  • Representative professional products (e.g. publication reprints, pedagogical artifacts)
  • Contact information for three references

Compensation: $50,000-$55,000
Contact: Tom Platt, tgplatt@ksu.edu
Web Link: https://careers.k-state.edu/en-us/job/516769/instructor
Review Starts: 3/18/2024
Application Closes: 6/1/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Postdoctoral fellow in Evolutionary Genomics
Position Type: Post-doctoral Research Fellow
Institution: University of Houston
Department: Biology and Biochemistry
Field: Evolutionary Genomics
City: Houston, TX, USA

General Information: A postdoctoral position is available in Dr. Richard Meisel's laboratory in the Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, TX, USA. Applicants with research interests in evolutionary genetics and genomics are encouraged to apply. The Meisel lab uses genetic and genomic approaches to study evolutionary processes in a diversity of fly models. Ongoing research projects include understanding how and why sex determination systems and sex chromosomes diverge across species; characterizing the genetic basis of intersexual phenotypic variation; and determining the causes of evolutionary divergence in immune systems. To address these questions, the lab combines organismal experimentation, genomic data analysis, genetic manipulation, bioinformatics, and computational modeling.

Qualifications: This postdoctoral position requires a Ph.D. and relevant academic experience. The successful applicant will have a background in population genetics, molecular ecology, molecular genetics, evolutionary genomics, bioinformatics, and/or entomology.

Responsibilities: Responsibilities will include contributing to ongoing research in the Meisel lab, developing independent research projects, and mentoring graduate/undergraduate students.

Instructions: Interested applicants should apply by emailing Richard Meisel (rpmeisel@uh.edu) a curriculum vitae; cover letter describing research interests and experience; and names and contact information for two references. Applications will be reviewed as they are received and continue until the position is filled.

Compensation: Competitive pay based on NSF and NIH rates
Contact: Rich Meisel, rpmeisel@uh.edu
Web Link: https://evol.mcmaster.ca/brian/evoldir/PostDocs//Houston.EvolutionaryGenomics
Review Starts: 2/1/2024
Application Closes: 6/30/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Postdoc or Staff Scientist in Macroevolution
Position Type: Post-doctoral Research Fellow
Institution: Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST)
Department: Macroevolution Unit
Field: Macroevolution
City: Onnason, Okinawa, Japan

General Information: A postdoctoral scholar (PhD <5 years) or staff scientist position (PhD >5 years) is available in the Macroevolution Unit at OIST. We seek a highly motivated and creative researcher with a background in macroevolution (e.g. phylogenetics, evolutionary processes, organismal biology, and/or paleontology) and a deep interest in reconstructing the evolution of vertebrate life and biodiversity dynamics (extinction, diversification, innovation), and a desire to develop their own projects. The researcher will pursue novel work involving data and methods such as phylogenetic comparative methods, trait analysis, and/or fossil record occurrences. 

This position is open to both paleontologists and researchers working on living groups, models, and molecular data, with a preference for those interested in fishes or other aquatic life. Exact projects will be developed through discussions with PI Sallan based on the skills, interests, and ideas of the selected researcher.

Qualifications: 1. PhD in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Paleontology, Organismal Biology or related field with dissertation focused on macroevolutionary or biodiversity questions.

  1. Experience and interest in macroevolutionary phenomena (e.g. diversification dynamics, evolutionary rates, trait origins, global events).
  2. Willingness to develop knowledge about areas and clades of interest to the unit if outside of past experience (e.g. fishes).
  3. Willingness to learn new methods as needed.
  4. Willingness to travel to museum collections as needed.
  5. Willingness to collaborate with other relevant labs at OIST and outside.
  6. Good spoken and written English skills, including for scientific terms and concepts. Japanese is not required but classes are provided to OIST employees and their families.

Responsibilities: 1. Develop and lead innovative projects related to the interests of the Macroevolution Unit.

  1. Publish results in high-quality journals.
  2. Present at national and international conferences.

Instructions: Apply at: https://www.oist.jp/careers/postdoctoral-scholar-or-staff-scientist-macroevolution-unit 

Compensation: Negotiable
Contact: Lauren Sallan, lauren.sallan@oist.jp
Web Link: https://www.oist.jp/careers/postdoctoral-scholar-or-staff-scientist-macroevolution-unit
Review Starts: 2/1/2024
Application Closes: 4/30/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Assistant Professor of Practice
Position Type: Non-Tenure-Track Assistant Professor
Institution: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Department: School of Biological Sciences
Field: Biology
City: Lincoln, NE, USA

General Information: The School of Biological Sciences (SBS) in the College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) invites applications for an Assistant Professor of Practice in Biology. This position is associated with a vibrant cross-campus community dedicated to promoting life sciences education through a systems-based approach to the study of life featuring a shared core sequence, interactive instruction, education research, and experiential learning.

The successful candidate will provide critical instruction and leadership for the LIFE introductory course sequence taken by life sciences majors across the university. They will teach high-enrollment introductory biology courses, coordinate one introductory biology lab course, and teach an additional biology course within their disciplinary area. They can have instructional expertise in any biology subdiscipline (e.g., molecular biology, cellular biology, developmental biology, genetics, microbiology, anatomy, physiology, ecology, or evolution). They will contribute to the university’s mission to promote inclusive excellence through dedicated teaching, ongoing scholarly development, and professional service. This is a teaching-focused, promotable, non-tenure track position with a multi-year renewable contract.

Qualifications: The successful candidate will demonstrate strong potential to deliver and coordinate effective and inclusive life sciences courses and to work collaboratively with other instructors, lab managers, department staff, teaching assistants, and undergraduate students.

A doctoral degree in biology, biology education, or a related discipline is required. Preference will be given to applicants with a demonstrated commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (assessed with rubric based on https://ofew.berkeley.edu/recruitment/contributions-diversity/rubric-assessing-candidate-contributions-diversity-equity); teaching interests that complement the needs of the LIFE program and the School of Biological Sciences; and prior experience teaching relevant lecture and/or lab courses.

Responsibilities: SBS offers a collaborative, interdisciplinary, and welcoming place to work (learn more at https://biosci.unl.edu), and UNL maintains an active community of discipline-based educational researchers across STEM disciplines. The city of Lincoln, Nebraska provides an outstanding quality of life that includes a vibrant downtown, a lively music and art scene, over 120 parks, 130 miles of trails, and a low cost of living (learn more at https://www.unl.edu/lincoln/about-lincoln and https://diversity.unl.edu/creating-connections-on-and-off-campus).

Instructions: Review of applications will begin on February 26, 2024, and will continue until the position is filled or the search is closed. To apply, go to https://employment.unl.edu, requisition F_240009. Complete the Faculty Academic/Administrative Information form and upload the following documents: (1) a cover letter highlighting the candidate’s interests and qualifications; (2) a Curriculum Vitae; (3) a document containing teaching and diversity statements; and (4) the names and contact information for three references. The two-page teaching statement should summarize instructional experiences, strategies, and interests. The teaching statement should include one paragraph about how your research background and plans complement your teaching interests. The one-page diversity statement should describe past experiences that advance diversity, equity, and inclusion, as well as future plans. Combine the two statements into a single document for upload. Questions regarding the application process may be sent to biologysearch@unl.edu. 

Compensation: TBD
Contact: School of Biological Sciences, biologysearch@unl.edu
Web Link: https://employment.unl.edu/postings/89605
Review Starts: 2/26/2024
Application Closes: 5/26/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Assistant Professor
Position Type: Tenure-Track Assistant Professor
Institution: Marshall University
Department: Biological Sciences
Field: Vertebrate Anatomy
City: Huntington, WV, USA

General Information: Classification Title Assistant Professor

Department Biological Science - MU2510

Job Description
Assistant Professor in Vertebrate Anatomy. The Department of Biological Sciences in the College of Science at Marshall University is seeking candidates for a full-time tenure-track faculty position at the rank of Assistant Professor. Applicants must have a PhD in the life sciences, at least two years of relevant postdoctoral experience, and a research program in comparative, gross, and/or micro- vertebrate anatomy.

The new hire is expected to bring to the position a competitive research program in the broad area of vertebrate functional anatomy, and introduce new model organisms and novel approaches to the department. This research program should expand on and form collaborations within existing strengths in the department, such as evolution, organismal biology, ecology, physiology, and molecular biology. We will consider applicants with research programs in any vertebrate taxon but are especially interested in candidates with an interest in mammalian systems and questions that integrate vertebrate anatomy and morphology with functional questions in extant organisms. A research program that makes use of vertebrate collections will be considered a plus.

Teaching responsibilities will predominantly be in the department’s general education and core courses for biology majors including courses in both human anatomy and vertebrate comparative anatomy. Prior experience in teaching undergraduate courses in vertebrate anatomy, mammalogy, and/or microanatomy/histology is preferred. The hire will also be expected to develop new graduate and upper-level undergraduate courses in their specific area of interest.

Our Department and College value exemplary teaching and research. The successful candidate will possess an independent, collaborative, and competitive research program that involves undergraduate and graduate students. In addition, the candidate will demonstrate a commitment to enthusiastic, innovative, and inclusive teaching.

Location MU - Marshall University

APPLICATION IS OPEN UNTIL FILLED

Qualifications: Qualifications

Must be able to perform all essential job duties as outlined in the job description.

Required Qualifications

Education
The successful candidate must have a PhD in the life sciences.

Experience
The successful candidate must have developed excellent teaching and communication skills. A record of research publications in refereed journals and evidence of active pursuit of external funding is also required. At least two years of relevant postdoctoral experience is required.

Preferred Qualifications
Experience
Experience teaching anatomy or related courses is preferred.

Responsibilities: The new hire is expected to bring to the position a competitive research program in the broad area of vertebrate functional anatomy, and introduce new model organisms and novel approaches to the department. 

Teaching responsibilities will predominantly be in the department’s general education and core courses for biology majors including courses in both human anatomy and vertebrate comparative anatomy. 

See job description for additional details.

Instructions: Begin the application process online at the link provided.

Compensation: Salary is commensurate with experience and internal equity
Contact: Herman L Mays Jr, maysh@marshall.edu
Web Link: https://marshall.peopleadmin.com/postings/24726
Review Starts: 12/21/2023
Application Closes: 5/1/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Post-doctoral Research and Teaching Fellow
Position Type: Post-doctoral Research Fellow
Institution: Augustana University, South Dakota
Department: Biology
Field: Evolutionary Genetics
City: Sioux Falls, SD, USA

General Information: A postdoctoral scholar and teacher position is available in 2024 in the Olson-Manning Lab to work on NSF CAREER funded work related to the ecological and evolutionary mechanisms shaping hybridization in the common and showy milkweeds (Asclepias syriaca and A. speciosa). The applicant will also have the opportunity to teach as the instructor of record in team and independent settings in a department that values evidence-based pedagogy and undergraduate-driven research.

The Olson-Manning Lab, located in the Department of Biology at Augustana University, values diversity in all forms and is committed to fostering a supportive, inclusive, and welcoming work environment. Applications from candidates passionate about increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM through teaching and outreach and educational activities are encouraged to apply. 

Research projects (75% time and effort) involve reciprocal transplant garden planting and monitoring in eastern and western South Dakota, greenhouse studies, and comparison of gene and metabolite co-expression networks architecture between the species and among species and hybrids. In addition to collaborating on the NSF CAREER-funded aims, the scholar will have the opportunity to develop an independent research program suited for undergraduate-driven research at a teaching-focused university. Applicants with a background in some of the following are especially encouraged to apply: evolutionary biology, genomics, gene expression or metabolomics, and ecological field research. 

Teaching and pedagogical development will be approximately 25% time and effort of this position. This will include independent laboratory development and instruction in year 1, team teaching in General Biology courses in year 2, and development of an upper-level course in the applicant's expertise in year 2 or 3. Class sizes will be between 15 and 50 students. The faculty in the Biology Department at Augustana are committed to effective and innovative teaching and the scholar will receive mentoring from a diverse faculty. 

The position would be for three years (contingent upon annual review at year 1).

Qualifications: Required: PhD in one of these fields: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Plant Biology, or Genetics/Genomics. 

Preferred: Experience working with genomic data, a strong conceptual background in evolutionary biology.

Responsibilities: Collaborating on research on milkweed hybridization. Interacting with students, faculty and leadership with different backgrounds and points of view and a deep appreciation of and respect for academic values and culture must be a top value of the candidate.

Instructions: Applications will be considered until the position is filled. Please send: (1) a one-page cover letter, (2) a statement on your commitment to diversity (how you worked to promote diversity, equity and inclusion in your previous position and how you plan to continue to do so at Augustana), (3) a relevant publication or manuscript in preparation, (4) a curriculum vita, (5) a completed Augustana University employment application, (6) and  names and contact info of three professional references electronically to humanresources@augie.edu.

Compensation: The starting salary is $55,000/year + full benefits.
Contact: Carrie Olson-Manning, colsonmanning@augie.edu
Web Link: https://www.augie.edu/faculty-positions#Postdoctoral%20Scholar%20and%20Teacher,%20Evolutionary%20Biology
Review Starts: 2/1/2024
Application Closes: 4/30/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Assistant Professor of Evolutionary Biology
Position Type: Tenure-Track Assistant Professor
Institution: University of California, Santa Barbara
Department: Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology
Field: Evolutionary Biology
City: Santa Barbara, CA, USA

General Information: The Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology of the University of California Santa Barbara invites applications for a tenure-track position as Assistant Professor of Evolutionary Biology with an anticipated start date of 1 July 2024. The department is looking for exceptional individuals with expertise in evolutionary biology. We are especially interested in candidates whose research investigates the connections between genetics and phenotype, and whose research and teaching would complement existing campus strength in global change biology and quantitative biology.

Responsibilities of faculty members include teaching at undergraduate and/or graduate levels, recruitment, supervision, and mentorship of graduate students, participation in university service and professional activities, and the development of an externally funded and broadly recognized research program. Successful candidates will have a record of collaborative research, and will be able to leverage synergies within EEMB and the UCSB campus.

Our department and the University of California seeks to recruit and retain a diverse workforce as a reflection of our commitment to serve the people of California. UC Santa Barbara is a Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI), an Asian American and Native American Pacific Islander Serving Institution (AANAPISI), and 40% of UCSB’s undergraduate student body are first-generation college students. We invite candidates who understand the systemic barriers facing individuals from underrepresented groups in STEM and who will leverage evidence-based teaching strategies and enable diverse research opportunities to provide equitable opportunities and promote diversity and inclusion across educational environments.

The University is especially interested in candidates who can contribute to the diversity and excellence of the academic community through teaching, research, and service as appropriate to the position.

Qualifications:

Basic Qualifications:
Ph.D. in Evolutionary Biology or similar discipline is required at the time of application.
1+ year of postdoctoral experience

Preferred Qualifications:
Able and willing to teach evolutionary biology with approaches that will enable access to a wide diversity of students.
Successful grantsmanship commensurate with career stage.
Expertise in field of study as indicated by publications in highly ranked journals in the field.
Broadly trained with interdisciplinary experience as appropriate for evolutionary biologists.
Evidence of a track record of mentoring and fostering the success of historically under-represented students and/or the ability to interface with and contribute to departmental, institutional, and national initiatives in these areas.

Contact: Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, bdinelli@ucsb.edu
Web Link: https://recruit.ap.ucsb.edu/JPF02635
Review Starts: 1/15/2024
Application Closes: 6/30/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Assistant Professor, Evolutionary ecology
Position Type: Tenure-Track Assistant Professor
Institution: University of Ottawa
Department: Biology
Field: evolution and ecology
City: Ottawa, Canada

General Information: The Department of Biology at University of Ottawa invites applications for a tenure-track position at the rank of Assistant Professor. For this position, the successful candidate will demonstrate potential to build an internationally-recognized and externally funded research program that fully engages trainees at all levels, building collaborations within and beyond our collegial, research-intensive department. Candidates must be able to teach in both French and English at the time of hiring at undergraduate and graduate levels. Exceptional candidates at Associate Professor level may also be considered. The starting date is July 1, 2024.

We seek to build on the Department’s strengths in evolutionary ecology. Successful applicants to this position will be active on theoretical and/or empirical research at the broad interface of ecology and evolution, working at any level of biological organization, from molecules to biological communities or at biogeographical extents, including (but not limited to) specializations like behavioural ecology, molecular ecology, and ecological genetics.

The successful candidate will join a research-intensive, growing department of 40 researchers working in a wide range of fields, including cell and molecular biology, physiology, ecotoxicology, neuroscience, developmental biology, ecology and conservation, evolutionary biology, and bioinformatics. The Department maintains close collaborations with researchers at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa Brain and Mind Institute, Ottawa Heart Institute, Carleton University, federal science departments and agencies, and the Canadian Museum of Nature. The Faculty of Science provides access to core facilities for molecular biology, genomics, chemistry, microscopy and aquatic animal care to all of its members.

Qualifications: PhD in Biology or a related discipline. Postdoctoral experience is expected. A demonstrated track record of research excellence must be clearly presented, along with commitment and strategies for teaching and graduate training. The candidate must be able to teach in both French and English, the two official languages of the University, at the time of hiring.

Responsibilities: The responsibilities include: 1) maintaining a robust, externally funded research program; 2) supervision of graduate and undergraduate student thesis projects in the department; 3) teaching undergraduate and graduate courses that contribute to the bilingual (English-French) Biology or Biomedical Sciences curriculum; and 4) performing an active role within the department by contributing to administrative and academic activities of the Department, and Faculty of Science.

Instructions: More information regarding Academic Careers can be found online. Applications must be submitted electronically through the University of Ottawa Careers portal. Candidates should include the following in their application:

- A one-page cover letter formally expressing interest in the position and including a statement regarding their ability to teach in French and English
- A full curriculum vitae (please include career interruptions such as parental or sick leaves that may have impacted your record of research. These will be taken into consideration in the selection process)
- A detailed research plan (3 pages maximum)
- A statement of teaching interests and how principles of equity, diversity, and inclusion will be included in training of research group members (1 page)
- Contact information of three references
- Three peer-reviewed publications
- Self-Identification Form: The University of Ottawa is committed to ensuring equity, diversity and inclusion in the scholarly and leadership environments of our students, staff, and faculty

Compensation: Regular tenure-track academic appointment in the Faculty of Science, with a salary consistent with the collective agreement of the Association of Professors of the University of Ottawa. The salary scale for assistant professors starts at $89,622 (based on the scale in effect on May 1, 2023).
Contact: Chair, Department of Biology,, biochair.assistant@uottawa.ca
Web Link: https://uottawa.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/uOttawa_External_Career_Site/job/Tenure-track-positions-in-evolutionary-ecology---BIO_JR7952
Review Starts: 12/1/2024
Application Closes: 12/1/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Assistant Professor in Genes, Genomes, and Evolution
Position Type: Tenure-Track Assistant Professor
Institution: University of Nebraska Lincoln
Department: School of Biological Sciences
Field: Genes, Genomes, and Evolution
City: Lincoln, NE, USA

General Information: The School of Biological Sciences (SBS), in the College of Arts and Sciences (CAS), at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) invites applications for an academic-year, tenure-track, assistant professor position in Genes, Genomes, and Evolution. The successful candidate will work broadly to elucidate molecular or cellular mechanisms that link genes and traits using an integrative approach in any plant, animal, or microbial system in an evolutionary context. This position will play a key role in furthering SBS goals to integrate across biological levels to understand how organisms develop, function, interact with, and adapt to their environment. This is the second of what is expected to be a cluster of at least two faculty in this area. 

The successful candidate will demonstrate a strong record of original research as evidenced by peer-reviewed publications. They will be expected to contribute to the university’s mission to promote diversity and inclusive excellence, establish a nationally recognized and extramurally funded research program, be dedicated to education at the undergraduate and graduate levels, and be committed to inclusive teaching.

Qualifications: A Ph.D. in biology or a related discipline; research experience in genes, genomes, and evolution, as evidenced by peer-reviewed publications; and postdoctoral or equivalent training are required. Preference will be given to candidates with a demonstrated commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (assessed with rubric based on https://ofew.berkeley.edu/recruitment/contributions-diversity/rubric-assessing-candidate-contributions-diversity-equity); the ability to build upon and expand existing research in SBS (https://biosci.unl.edu); a commitment to teaching at the undergrad and graduate levels; and the likelihood of success at obtaining intramural grants, judged by the research statement.

Responsibilities: The successful candidate will receive dedicated lab and office space and a competitive start-up package and will have the opportunity to collaborate with an accomplished group of biologists in SBS, the Nebraska Center for Virology, and other units across the UNL campus and the University of Nebraska system. SBS offers a collaborative, interdisciplinary, and welcoming place to work. As articulated in our strategic plans, SBS (https://biosci.unl.edu/diversity), CAS (https://cas.unl.edu/strategic-plan), and UNL (https://diversity.unl.edu/) are committed to enhancing diversity, inclusion, and equity in all aspects of our mission from undergraduate and graduate students to faculty and staff. 

The city of Lincoln, Nebraska provides an outstanding quality of life that includes a vibrant downtown with a lively music and art scene, a collection of over 120 parks, and 130 miles of bike trails, plus a low cost of living. Learn more about the city of Lincoln at https://www.unl.edu/lincoln/about-lincoln and https://diversity.unl.edu/creating-connections-on-and-off-campus

Instructions: Review of applications will begin on October 20, 2023, and will continue until the position is filled or the search is closed. Applicants should go to https://employment.unl.edu, requisition F_230143. Complete the Faculty Academic/Administrative Information form, and upload the following documents: (1) a cover letter highlighting the candidate’s interest in the position and their qualifications; (2) a Curriculum Vitae; (3) a document with research, teaching, and diversity statements; and (4) the names and contact information for three references. The two-page research statement should describe research interests and future plans. The one-page teaching statement should summarize instructional strategies, experience, and interests. The one-page diversity statement should describe past experiences that advance diversity, equity, and inclusion, as well as future plans. Combine the three statements into a single document for upload. Questions regarding the application process may be sent to biologysearch@unl.edu.  

UNL seeks to achieve a working and learning environment that is open to all people. Dignity and respect for all in the UNL community are the responsibility of each individual member of the community. The realization of that responsibility across the campus is critical to UNL’s success.  

As an EO/AA employer, the University of Nebraska considers qualified applicants for employment without regard to race, color, ethnicity, national origin, sex, pregnancy, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, disability, age, genetic information, veteran status, marital status, and/or political affiliation. See https://www.unl.edu/equity/notice-nondiscrimination

Contact: Kristi Montooth, biologysearch@unl.edu
Web Link: https://employment.unl.edu/postings/88052
Review Starts: 10/20/2023
Application Closes: 5/31/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Faculty Position in Evolutionary Biology
Position Type: Tenure-Track Assistant Professor
Institution: University of Rochester
Department: Department of Biology
Field: Evolutionary Biology
City: Rochester, NY, USA

General Information: The Department of Biology at the University of Rochester invites applications for a tenure-track Assistant Professor position in evolutionary genetics and genomics. We are searching for applicants whose research program uses computational approaches to answer important theoretical or applied questions in evolutionary biology and who would complement our existing strengths in genetics and genomics. We are especially interested in those who envision making advances in phylogenetics, population genetics, molecular evolution, comparative genomics or population biology.

The successful candidate is expected to establish an externally funded research program and contribute to undergraduate and graduate teaching and research mentoring. Applicants should have a PhD awarded no later than January 2024 and academic credentials commensurate with a candidate’s current position. The University of Rochester offers strong institutional support, including state of the art computing infrastructure, and a rich environment for interactions beyond our department, including the Goergen Institute for Data Science and the University of Rochester Medical Center.

Complete applications include: a cover letter, curriculum vitae, a statement of research interests and plans, a statement of teaching qualifications and interests, three letters of reference, pdfs of three publications, and a statement on advancing equity and fostering an inclusive and diverse community in academia. The diversity and inclusion statement may include your values, past experience, future plans, and/or leadership in relationship to teaching, research, or service. Instructions for supplying the reference letters are provided on the application website. Applicant screening will start November 1 and will continue until candidates for interviews have been chosen. The anticipated start date of the position is July 2024.

Salary: $100,000 – $115,000
The referenced pay range represents the full base range of pay for this job. Individual salaries will be determined within the job’s salary range and established based on market data, experience and expertise of the individual, and internal equity considerations.

The University of Rochester has a strong commitment to diversity and to groups underrepresented in higher education. The University is an Equal Opportunity Employer, and all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, sex, religion, age, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin, disability, or protected veteran status.

EOE / Minorities / Females / Protected Veterans / Disabled

Qualifications: PhD

Responsibilities: Research, teaching

Instructions: Complete applications include: a cover letter, curriculum vitae, a statement of research interests and plans, a statement of teaching qualifications and interests, three letters of reference, pdfs of three publications, and a statement on advancing equity and fostering an inclusive and diverse community in academia. The diversity and inclusion statement may include your values, past experience, future plans, and/or leadership in relationship to teaching, research, or service. Instructions for supplying the reference letters are provided on the application website.

Compensation: $100,000 - $115,000 annually
Contact: Brenna Rybak, brenna.rybak@rochester.edu
Web Link: https://www.rochester.edu/faculty-recruiting/positions/show/16322
Review Starts: 11/1/2023
Application Closes: 5/1/2024


Back to top.

 

Title: Chairperson
Position Type: Full-time
Institution: Michigan State University
Department: Integrative Biology
Field: Integrative Biology
City: East Lansing, MI, USA

General Information: The Michigan State University Department of Integrative Biology invites applicants and nominations for the position of Chairperson.  The Chair will lead an internationally recognized department with a long history of innovation and excellence (https://integrativebiology.msu.edu)  The department’s core mission is to advance understanding of the function, stability, resilience, and adaptation of complex biological systems via research, teaching, and outreach while striving to recruit, retain, and develop a diverse vibrant and inclusive community of scholars. We use cutting-edge tools to address important questions about genetics, genomics, development, physiology, behavior, ecology, and evolution in a wide array of organisms, over multiple temporal and spatial scales.  The department includes more than 30 faculty members, strong graduate and undergraduate programs, and a supportive administrative and technical staff.  Many faculty members are also affiliated with the MSU Ecology, Evolution and Behavior Program (https://eeb.msu.edu/) and Kellogg Biological Station (https://www.kbs.msu.edu), and numerous cross-college interdisciplinary graduate programs.

Qualifications: Candidates must be qualified to hold the rank of tenured Full Professor and possess an established record of scholarship in a relevant field. Additionally, candidates must demonstrate leadership and administrative effectiveness, strong interpersonal skills, and a meaningful commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), evaluated using the Berkeley rubric. Continuation of an active research program is encouraged and will be supported.

Responsibilities: The Chair is expected to cultivate a diverse, equitable, and inclusive environment that fosters collaboration, innovation and excellence in research and teaching while working with college and university administration to facilitate departmental governance, resource management and research support.

Instructions: Applicants should submit:  

  1. A cover letter addressing their interest in the position
  2. A curriculum vitae 
  3. A 5-page statement highlighting experience, accomplishments, vision, and implementation strategies in the following areas:
  4. Research, describing publications and grants, evidence of research leadership, and vision for promoting DEI and excellence in research.
  5. Education, describing teaching and outreach experience, mentoring experience and philosophy, and strategies for promoting DEI in graduate and undergraduate curricula.
  6. Leadership, including leadership roles and accomplishments, and budgetary and administrative experience, and strategies for aligning Integrative Biology with the newly-implemented Natural Sciences Strategic Plan that integrates DEI into all aspects of the college mission.
  7. The names of three references (who will be contacted only with your permission). 

Every effort will be made to maintain confidentiality until a list of interview candidates is determined. All materials should be assembled into one PDF and uploaded to: careers.msu.edu position # 804063. Review of applicants will begin 30 September 2022 and will continue until the position is filled. Questions regarding the position may be sent to the Chairs of the search committee, Amy Ralston (aralston@msu.edu) and Jeff Conner (connerj@msu.edu).

Compensation:
Contact: Amy Ralston, aralston@msu.edu
Web Link: https://careers.msu.edu/en-us/job/511934/chairpersonmanagement
Review Starts: 9/30/2022
Application Closes: 8/18/2024


Back to top.

 


View full page

EVOLUTION 2018

Symposium proposal submissions for Evolution 2018 in Montpellier, France are now open! Symposia proposals will be accepted until June 26. Note that this is during the Evolution 2017 meeting, so be sure to submit your proposal before you leave! Information about the format of the meeting, the symposia and what we expect for symposia organizers can be found at http://evolutionmontpellier2018.org/call-symposia.

 

MARCH FOR SCIENCE

Thank you to all who participated in a March for Science, either in DC or at one of the 600+ satellite marches around the world! More than 1 million people marched on April 22. (Read more about the number crunching on the March for Science blog.) Here is Sally Otto, SSE President, at the Vancouver march. To stay involved in advocating for science, check out the AAAS Force for Science page and the new March for Science website.

 

EVOLUTION LETTERS

The first issue of the open access journal Evolution Letters is now live! This journal is co-owned by SSE and the Society of Systematic Biologists, and members receive reduced publication fees. Read the first issue here. Submit your manuscript here.

 

EVOLUTION 2017 INFORMATION

Register today and join us for EVOLUTION 2017: June 23-27, 2017 in Oregon Convention Center Portland, Oregon. Information about the  SYMPOSIA and meeting schedule, as well and past and future meetings, can be found on our meeting web page

 

Diversity in Science Luncheon

Please come join the Diversity in Science luncheon at Evolution 2017! This event will be a discussion on identifying bias and increasing diversity across all dimensions. Cost is $15, and lunch is included. Add it to your registration by logging in here.

 

AIBS Policy Communication Workshop

A few seats are still open for the AIBS Workshop following the meeting! The workshop is titled "Informing and Engaging Decision-makers" and will take place June 28. Learn more here and add it to your registration by logging in here.

Meet the NSF DEB Program Officers at Evolution 2017

A number of program officers from the NSF's Division of Environmental Biology will be at Evolution this year. For a full list see the DEB Blog. There will also be an NSF Information Session during the meeting.

Regular Talks Full

Regular talks are now full, but you can still submit a poster until May 20. To submit a poster, follow this link, click on "Registration", sign in with the email and password you used to register, click "Author Center" in the top menu, and then click "Author/Attendee Login." The option to submit a poster will be on that page.

 

SSE Graduate Student and Postdoc travel supplements

Travel Award recipients for the Evolution 2017 meeting in Portland have been selected! Applicants should check their emails for award notifications. These awards total $43,500 in funding support to our student and postdoc members to attend and present at this year's meeting. Travel Award recipients are not eligible for the registration rebate offered in return for volunteering at the conference.

 

SPENDING BILLS

We were pleased to see that the NSF, NIH and others were largely spared in the recent federal fiscal decisions. Learn more from the AIBS Policy Report.

 

STEPHEN JAY GOULD PRIZE 

The SSE Education Committee is pleased to announce the winner of the 2017 Stephen Jay Gould Prize: Dr. Timothy R. Birkhead. Dr. Birkhead is Professor of Behavior and Evolution at the University of Sheffield and has made major contributions to understanding how animal behavior evolves under environmental pressures and in response to competition. Dr. Birkhead has had a distinguished career both advancing the science of evolution and in conveying that knowledge to the general public. Dr. Birkhead has promoted evolution through his extremely successful popular science books that include Promiscuity: An Evolutionary History of Sperm Competition (2000), The Red Canary(2003), The Wisdom of Birds (2008), Bird Sense (2012), Ten Thousand Birds: Ornithology Since Darwin (2014), and The Most Perfect Think: The inside (and Outside) of a Birds Egg (2016), as well as through many popular science articles.  Congratulations!

 

ROSEMARY GRANT WINNERS ANNOUNCED

Congratulations to the 27 graduate students who were selected to receive a Rosemary Grant Research Award from the SSE.  The goal of these grants is to identify and support innovative and potentially high impact research by beginning graduate students. These awards represent over $60,000 per year of investment into research by our doctoral student members.

 

 

Older

2016 SSE Grants for Local and Regional Outreach Promoting the Understanding of Evolutionary Biology

This note is a call for proposals for support for local and regional educational outreach activities to take place during 2016. It is our hope that these projects will lead to ongoing outreach collaboration in future years.  Preference will be given to new collaborations, but extensions of previously projects that have evidence of success are allowed. Guidelines for applying for funds to support SSE 2016 outreach projects are as follows:

  1. Proposal: Clearly but briefly state your plans in NO MORE THAN one single-spaced page.
  2. Amounts requested may be up to $1000.  Include a short justification for the use of the funds.  Indicate any additional matching funds and include letters of commitment from collaborative partners.  NOTE: Projects under $500 will receive funds upon award.  Projects from $500 - $1000 will receive funds upon completion of the project and submission of receipts.
  3. Send your request by email attachment (subject heading 'SSE Outreach 2016') to Robert Pennock [pennock5@msu.edu] no later than 25 January 2016.

Applications will be ranked by an SSE Education Committee working group according to the following criteria:

  1. Clarity and quality of the proposed activity;
  2. Expected impact in terms of reaching a critical or broad audience;
  3. Evidence, in the form of matching funds, of partnership outside of your immediate academic department;
  4. Indication as to how the project might lead to new or ongoing successful outreach collaborations.

We expect to fund in the range of 10-20 applications, with announcement of awards to take place by February 8, 2016. 

Examples of past outreach activities have included public lectures, exhibits, student competitions, and professional development events for teachers.  We especially encourage proposals that focus on discussing and implementing evolution education reforms recommended in the Vision & Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: Chronicling Change, Inspiring the Future (2013) report < http://visionandchange.org/files/2015/07/VISchange2015_webFin.pdf > or on dialogues between undergraduate instructors and K-12 teachers around the new emphasis on evolution in the AP Biology Curriculum Framework (2015) <https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/ap/ap-biology-course-and-exam-description.pdf> and the Next Generation Science Standards <http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards>. We look forward to your applications!

Even if you are not interested in applying for funding from the SSE, we encourage you to engage through whatever means are at your disposal in opportunities to promote public understanding of evolutionary biology.
Sincerely,

Robert T. Pennock
Chair, SSE Education Committee Outreach Grants Program


Evol2014 About Women in Science events on the topic of Implicit Bias

Dear Colleagues,

Below are the links from the Evol2014 About Women in Science events on the topic of Implicit Bias. For each session, we have provided Joan’s presentation and the workshop responses from the attendees. We hope that you find the information useful.

We would like to thank the organizers of Evol2014, the three societies who sponsored these events, our guest speaker, Joan Herbers, and our attendees.

Post-tenure PowerPoint Presentation
http://www.clfs.umd.edu/biology/dudashlab/Evol2014%20Post-Tenure%20Workshop%20ImplicitBias%20Final.pdf

Post-tenure Take Home messages
http://www.clfs.umd.edu/biology/dudashlab/Post-Tenure%20Workshop%20Summary%20Evol2014%20Final%202July2014.pdf

Lunchtime PowerPoint Presentation
http://www.clfs.umd.edu/biology/dudashlab/Lunchtime%20NetworkingWorkshop%20Evol2014%20Final%202July2014.pdf

Lunchtime Take Home messages
http://www.clfs.umd.edu/biology/dudashlab/LunchtimeWorkshop%20Summary%20Evol2014%20Final%202July2014.pdf


Sincerely,
Michele Dudash and Jenny Boughman


Call for Symposia for 2015 Annual Meeting

The 2015 annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Evolution is planned for June 26-30, 2015 in Guaruja, Brazil. The SSE Council invites proposals for the two Society-sponsored symposia to be held in conjunction with the meeting. Symposium proposals should include: (1) a synopsis of the symposium theme (about one page); (2) a tentative list of speakers, including institutional affiliations, and topics; (3) a rationale for the symposium explaining why this topic and this group of speakers are particularly appropriate for a Society-sponsored symposium; and (4) a statement that all potential speakers have been contacted and agree to participate in the symposium.

In evaluating proposals, SSE Council seriously considers the diversity of participants as a major qualification. Symposium organizers are expected to take into account gender, seniority, nationality, and other aspects traditionally underrepresented in Society symposia when preparing proposals. In addition, Council will favor those proposals whose topics concern newly emerging fields, fields ripe for syntheses, and fields different from those that have been included in recent Society symposia.

The Council will select two proposals for half-day symposia at the annual meeting in June 2014. All applicants will be notified of the Council's decision in August. The Society provides travel support for organizers and participants in sponsored symposia. Details are available on request. To be assured of full consideration, proposals must be received by midnight Eastern Standard Time on June 6, 2014:

Butch Brodie
Executive Vice President, SSE
Department of Biology
University of Virginia
P.O. Box 400328
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4328
bbrodie@virginia.edu

Proposals should be sent by email (bbrodie@virginia.edu) as a single attachment in PDF format (under subject heading: SSE Symposia Proposal). Please expect and request confirmation of receipt of the proposal.



Local and Regional Outreach Promoting the Understanding of Evolutionary Biology

This note is a call for proposals for support for such activities to take place during 2014. It is our hope that these projects will lead to ongoing outreach collaboration in future years.

Guidelines for applying for funds to support SSE 2014 outreach projects are as follows:

  1. Clearly but briefly state your plans in NO MORE THAN a single page.
  2. Amounts requested may be up to $1,000, with additional matching funds clearly indicated. Include letters of commitment from collaborative partners or indicate whom you have approached in this regard.
  3. Send your request by email attachment (subject heading 'SSE Outreach 2014') to Robert Pennock [pennock5@msu.edu] no later than 25 January 2014.

Applications will be ranked by an SSE Education Committee working group according to the following criteria:

  1. Clarity and quality of the proposed activity;
  2. Expected impact in terms of reaching a critical or broad audience;
  3. Evidence, in the form of matching funds, of partnership outside of your immediate academic department;
  4. Indication as to how the project might lead to ongoing outreach collaboration.

We expect to fund in the range of 10-20 applications, with announcement of awards to take place by February 15, 2014. 

Examples of past outreach activities have included public lectures, exhibits, student competitions, and professional development events for teachers.  This year we would especially encourage proposals that focus on discussing and implementing evolution education reforms recommended in the Vision & Change in Undergraduate Biology Education (2011) report <http://visionandchange.org/finalreport/> or on dialogues between undergraduate instructors and K-12 teachers around the new emphasis on evolution in the AP Biology Curriculum Framework (2012-13) < http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/pdf/ap/10b_2727_AP_Biology_CF_WEB_110128.pdf> and the Next Generation Science Standards <http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards>.

We look forward to your applications!

Even if you are not interested in applying for funding from the SSE, we encourage you to engage through whatever means are at your disposal in opportunities to promote public understanding of evolutionary biology.

Sincerely,

Robert T. Pennock, On behalf of the SSE Education Committee



Local and Regional Outreach Promoting the Understanding of Evolutionary Biology

This note is a call for proposals for support for such activities to take place during 2013.  It is our hope that these projects will lead to ongoing outreach collaboration in future years.

Guidelines for applying for funds to support SSE 2013 outreach projects are as follows:

  1. Clearly but briefly state your plans in NO MORE THAN a single page.
  2. Amounts requested may be up to $800, with additional matching funds clearly indicated.  Include letters of commitment from collaborative partners or indicate whom you have approached in this regard.
  3. Send your request by email attachment (subject heading 'SSE Outreachm2013') to Robert Pennock pennock5@msu.edu no later than 10 March 2013.
Applications will be ranked by an SSE Education Committee working group according to the following criteria:
  1. Clarity and quality of the proposed activity;
  2. Expected impact in terms of reaching a broad audience;
  3. Evidence, in the form of matching funds, of partnership outside of your immediate academic department;
  4. Indication as to how the project might lead to ongoing outreach collaboration.
We expect to fund in the range of 10-20 applications, with announcement of awards to take place in mid May 2013.

Examples of outreach activities might include public lectures, exhibits, student competitions, etc; but we do not want to be overly prescriptive. Indeed, we look forward to seeing how imaginative the SSE might be collectively. We look forward to your applications!

Even if you are not interested in applying for funding from the SSE, we encourage you to engage through whatever means are at your disposal in opportunities to promote public understanding of evolutionary biology.

Sincerely,

Robert T. Pennock, On behalf of the SSE Education Committee


SSE International Committee (SSE-IC)

The SSE-IC mission is to foster international relationships between evolution societies and its members with particular focus on students and early-career scientists. The committee sponsors annually a series of activities/awards to reach this goal:
1. International Travel Stipends (IT- Awards)
2. Co-sponsorship of symposia organized by non-US based evolution societies
3. Evolution International Events (EIE) awards
The International Travel Stipend is managed directly by the SSE-IC committee. For the other two award types, the SSE-IC committee will present the best proposals to the SSE council, which will decide on the winner for that year. The equivalent of 10,000 euros will be devoted to the International Travel stipends. The rest of the available funding will be either given to either a single proposal from one category or divided amongst the best proposals in either of the two categories.


SSE Travel Stipends

These stipends are for students and young scientists to attend the SSE meeting in Snow Bird, Utah in June (http://www.evolutionmeeting.org/) and the ESEB Congress in Lisbon in August 2013 (http://www.eseb2013.com/). The stipend will contribute to covering travel, living expenses and congress registration fees. The stipend will be paid out as a reimbursement after the congress, based on specification of the expenses.

Eligibility:
Applicants must be SSE members (for becoming a member of SSE, see http://cms.gogrid.evolutionsociety.org/)

Applications can be submitted by scientists at various stages of their professional career (e.g., Masters and PhD students, postdocs, and lecturers).

Scientists working in a country with high GDP are not eligible (for the list of excluded countries see below).

People who received an SSE travel stipend in the last five years are not eligible.

Applicants must submit to present either an oral communication or a poster to be eligible for the stipend. This will be verified before the reimbursement, but no proof that a poster or talk is accepted is necessary at the application stage.

PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE STIPENDS ARE GIVEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH ANALOGOUS STIPENDS TO ATTEND THE LISBON MEETING OFFERED BY ESEB (separate call), SO THERE IS NO NEED TO APPLY TO BOTH

How to apply: send your application by email to the SSE International Committee, c/o Prof. N Wedell <N.Wedell@exeter.ac.uk>. The application should be no more than 2 pages long and include:

  • Name of the applicant;
  • Budget, including sources of additional support;
  • An explanation of how attendance to the meeting will further the attendant’s professional goals;
  • and a CV

Please submit the application as a single PDF-file.
A support letter from the applicant advisor/mentor/senior colleague is also required. Support letters should be sent to the same email address (N.Wedell@exeter.ac.uk) by the applicant’s mentor.

Deadline: March 31, 2013, 24:00 GMT.

Members professionally based in the following countries are not eligible for the travel stipend: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxemburg, Malta, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland , United Kingdom, United States of America.


Co-sponsorship of symposia organized by non-US based evolution societies

The goal of this award is to foster communication between scientists from different countries by stimulating scientific dialogue through co-sponsored symposia. Evolution societies with limited financial resources will have the opportunity to invite speakers (SSE members) to their meeting. This will provide growth opportunities for both societies, since it will not only benefit the hosting society but also create the opportunities for new collaborations for the invited speakers.
Eligibility: Organizers of approved symposia may apply to seek partial support for symposia that include SSE members as invited speakers.
Application: An application should not be more than 3 pages long and include:
   1. Name(s) and affiliations of the symposia organizer, including CV (not included in the page limit).
   2. The meeting and its dates.
   3. The symposia title.
   4. A list of the committed symposia speakers.
   5. Name(s), affiliations of the symposia speakers to be supported through this award, including CV (not included in the page limit).
   6. The institution/organization responsible for administering the funds.
   7. A rationale of the event explaining how the presence of the invited speaker(s) will foster international cooperation and mutually benefit SSE and the meeting sponsors.
    8. A budget showing (1) how funds from SSE, (2) the meeting sponsors, (3) and other sources will be used to cover the symposium.
Applications should be sent as a single pdf document to Prof. Nina Wedell (SSE-IC Chair; N.Wedell@Exeter.ac.uk).
Deadline for application is March 31, 2013; applications received after that date will be considered as funds allow.


Evolution International Events Awards (EIE Awards)

These events are aimed at furthering the purpose of the Evolution Society by fostering international collaborations amongst evolution oriented societies and scientists. Eligible events would include specialized symposia, workshops and short courses in any aspect of evolutionary biology. The events could be hosted either in the US or abroad and preference should be given to events that specifically include participants from countries other than the USA.
Eligibility:  If held in the US, the event should have a clear training component targeting students and young scientists from countries other than the US. If held abroad, this event should be co-sponsored by SSE members and by scientists from the hosting country.  Co-sponsorship by the Evolution society from the hosting country, when possible, will be encouraged.  SEE membership for one year is a mandatory requirement to be included in the registration fee (not for participants that are already SSE members).

An application should not be more than 3 pages long and include:
1. Names and titles of the organizers.
2. The institution that will be responsible for administering the funds.
3. The title event.
4. A rationale of the event explaining why the event is needed, how does it fit with the purpose of the SSE and the goals of this specific award, how SSE support will improve the event, how participation of young scientists from the geographic region where the event will be promoted.
5. A description of the event.
6. A list of the primary participants who have been contacted and have expressed interest in being part of the event, if funded.
7. Dates and location of the event.
8. How the participants will be selected.
9. A budget showing (1) how funds from SSE will be used, (2) how funds from other sources will be used, (3) the fee structure to attend the event, if funding will not allow to cover all the costs.
10. A CV of the proposal PI’s (SSE member and co-sponsor from the hosting country). The CV’s are not included in the 3 pages limits for the proposal.

Applications should be sent as a single pdf document to Prof. Nina Wedell (SSE-IC Chair; N.Wedell@Exeter.ac.uk).

Deadline for application is March 31, 2013; applications received after that date will be considered as funds allow.


Ninth Annual University of Michigan "Early Career Scientists Symposium"
March 16, 2013

MACROEVOLUTION: FOSSILS, FRAMEWORKS, AND PHYLOGENIES

Call for nominations

The Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Michigan invites nominations of outstanding scientists early in their careers to take part in an exciting international symposium on the conceptual and methodological integration of paleontological and phylogenetic approaches to the study of macroevolution. The symposium events will take place from 15-17 March 2013, in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Nine early-career scientists will be selected to present their work alongside two plenary speakers and participate in panel discussions. We welcome nominations of scientists who are studying any aspect of macroevolution using paleontological, molecular phylogenetic, or theoretical approaches. We are especially interested in scientists whose work recognizes the promises and/or challenges of developing a unified neontological and paleontological framework for understanding macroevolutionary patterns.

Early career scientists are defined as senior graduate students (who stand to receive their Ph.D. within one year), postdoctoral researchers, and first- or second-year faculty.  A colleague or advisor must provide the nomination.

A nomination consists of a brief letter of recommendation addressing the nominee’s scientific promise and ability to give a good talk, the nominee's curriculum vitae, and a brief abstract of the proposed presentation (< 200 words, written by the nominee).  Nominations may be sent electronically (in one file if possible) to eeb-ecss-nomination@umich.edu using the nominee's name as the subject line (last name first, please).  More information is available at http://sitemaker.umich.edu/ecss2013.

All nominations must be received by January 15, 2013.

Selected participants will be contacted by February 1, 2013 and will have all expenses covered (registration, travel and accommodation). An official announcement of the slate of speakers will be issued soon thereafter.

For more information, contact Cindy Carl at cacarl@umich.edu and/or go to our website at http://sitemaker.umich.edu/ecss2013.


National Science Foundation’s Division of Integrative Organismal Systems UPDATE

Dear SSE Members,

The National Science Foundation’s Division of Integrative Organismal Systems has issued an updated solicitation for the core programs (NSF 13-506) along with a revised set of IOS Frequently Asked Questions (NSF 13-09) which are now available on the IOS home page at: http://www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?div=IOS

The core programs covered under this solicitation in the Division of Integrative Organismal Systems (IOS) support research aimed at understanding why organisms are structured the way they are and function as they do.  Areas of inquiry include, but are not limited to, developmental biology and the evolution of developmental processes, nervous system development, structure, and function, physiological processes, functional morphology, symbioses, interactions of organisms with biotic and abiotic environments, and animal behavior.

The Division of Integrative Organismal Systems (IOS) will also host a Webinar to discuss the outcomes of the new preliminary proposal system thus far and answer questions about the updated solicitation on Monday, December 10th. Information about how to sign up for the webinar will follow shortly and be posted to the IOS home page.

Please feel free to post these links and information for your membership and include them in your newsletters.

Michelle Elekonich

Michelle M. Elekonich, PhD
IOS Science Advisor
   ICOB Program Director
   Behavioral Systems Cluster Leader
Division of Integrative Organismal Systems
Directorate for Biological Sciences
National Science Foundation
4201 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22230
tel : 703.292.7202
fax : 703.292.9153
email: melekoni@nsf.gov

The next preliminary proposal deadline for IOS is January 18, 2013. The current IOS core program solicitation NSF 13-506 can be found here:    nsf.gov - Publications - nsf13506 Division of Integrative Organismal Systems - Core Programs - US National Science Foundation (NSF)

FAQs for the core solicitation can be found here:   http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/nsf13009/nsf13009.jsp?



View full page

 

 The Education & Outreach Committee was established in 1997.  The Committee sponsors outreach to educators and the general public through annual presentations at the NABT, SACNAS, and symposia and workshops at the annual meetings of the SSE.  The Committee also supports SSE members for outreach activities (see Awards and Funding opportunities below).

 

Committee Membership

Statement on Evolution

Resources for Teachers and Students

evoED Digital Library

Awards and Funding Opportunities


View full page

Statement on evolution by the Society for the Study of Evolution   
"Evolution" refers both to a set of scientific facts and to a theory explaining such facts. "Evolution" refers to the scientific fact that biological organisms have changed through time, and that all life, including humanity, has descended with modification from common ancestors. Evolution is as well documented as are other currently accepted scientific facts. The theory of evolution is a comprehensive and well-established scientific explanation, based on natural processes, of the fact of biological evolution.

Statement on the teaching of evolution by the Society for the Study of Evolution
Evolutionary theory should be taught in public schools because it is one of the most important scientific theories ever generated, and because it is the accepted scientific explanation for the diversity of life. As a scientific theory, it is testable and has been extensively tested. As stated by the great geneticist and evolutionist Theodosius Dobzhansky, "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution." The theory of evolution is subject to refinements and revisions, but this is no different from any other major scientific theory, such as those providing the explanatory frameworks of geology, physics, or chemistry. There is no pedagogical or scientific reason to treat evolutionary theory any differently than any other well-accepted scientific theory, and it should be taught in public schools as the firmly established, accepted unifying scientific principle that it is.

To learn more about the evidence for and importance of evolution to a variety of scientific questions see the white paper "Evolution, Science, and Society."

The National Academy of Sciences Report on "Science and Creationism” states unequivocally that "creationism has no place in any science curriculum at any level...This booklet explores the nature of science, reviews the evidence for the origin of the universe and earth, and explains the current scientific understanding of biological evolution."

 

Statements by other scientific societies

American Anthropological Association
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Association of Physics Teachers
American Chemical Society
American Geological Institute
American Geophysical Union
American Institute of Biological Sciences
American Institute of Physics
American Society of Naturalists
Australian Academy of Science

Biophysical Society
Botanical Society of America
Ecological Society of America
European Society for Evolutionary Biology
Genetics Society of America
National Academy of Science
National Science Teachers Association
Society for Neuroscience
Society of Systematic Biologists

Other scientific societies

Evolution Societies

American Society of Naturalists
Association pour l'Etude de l'Evolution Biologique
Australasian Evolution Society
Biologia Evolutiva em Portugal
Canadian Society for Ecology and Evolution
Ecological Genetics Group
European Society for Evolutionary Biology
European Society for Evolutionary Developmental Biology
Fachgruppe Evolutionsbiologie der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft
Human Behavior and Evolution Society
International Organization of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology
International Society for Behavioral Ecology
International Society for Evolutionary Protistology
Linnean Society
Sociedad Española de Biología Evolutiva
Societa' Italiana di Biologia Evoluzionistica
Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution
Verband deutscher Biologen

Genetics Societies

American Genetic Association
Canadian Society for Molecular Biosciences
Genetics Society
Genetics Society of America
Genetics Society of Australia
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética

Paleontology and Geology Societies

Geological Society of America
Paläontologische Gesellschaft
Paleontological Society
Society of Vertebrate Paleontology

Systematics Societies

Bay Area Biosystematists
Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik
Polish Taxonomical Society
Société Française de Systématique
Society of Australian Systematic Botanists
Society of Systematic Biologists
Swiss Systematics Society
Systematics Association
Systematics Association of New Zealand
Willi Hennig Society


View full page

Resources for Teaching Evolution

There are a number of excellent websites and organizations that provide extensive resources for teaching evolutionary biology:

  • Course Source: http://www.coursesource.org/
    An open-access journal of peer-reviewed teaching resources for undergraduate biological sciences.

  • Evo-Ed Cases: http://www.evo-ed.org/
    A set of online case studies that “track the evolution of traits from their origination in DNA mutation, to the production of different proteins, to the fixation of alternate macroscopic phenotypes in reproductively isolated populations.”

  • Evolution: Education and Outreach: https://evolution-outreach.springeropen.com/
    An open access journal that “promotes accurate understanding and comprehensive teaching of evolutionary theory for a wide audience.”

  • National Center for Science Education  https://ncse.com/
    NCSE is a nonprofit that “defends the integrity of science education against ideological interference. We work with teachers, parents, scientists, and concerned citizens at the local, state, and national levels to ensure that topics including evolution and climate change are taught accurately, honestly, and confidently.”

    • NCSEteach: Program in which participants receive strategies for teaching evolution, classroom materials, professional development resources, and priority access to NCSE programs and sponsored activities. https://ncse.com/signup-ncseteach

    • Scientist in the Classroom: A program that allows “teachers and scientists to collaborate as colleagues, peers and partners in the scientific enterprise to further science education.” https://ncse.com/scientistinclassroom

    • Dealing with Denial: Specific strategies for addressing the challenges that can come with teaching climate change and evolution in the classroom. https://ncse.com/dealingwithdenial

    • Classroom Resources: An extensive list of resources for both teaching and learning more about science, evolution, climate change, and more. https://ncse.com/classroom-resources

  • Sensory Ecology & Evolution Games: http://www.sensoryecology.com/games/
    A variety of citizen science games, where you help researchers better understand vision and camouflage, while learning about evolution along the way.

  • Understanding Evolution:  http://evolution.berkeley.edu/
    An extensive set of materials and resources for teaching K-12 and undergraduate students about evolution.

  • Understanding Science:  http://undsci.berkeley.edu/
    An extensive set of materials and resources for teaching K-12 and undergraduate students about science.

Programs, Courses and Workshops for Teachers

  • Evolution Education: http://www.evolutioned.org/
    Building a new model for K-12 science education based on teacher participation in scientific discovery.  Teachers can apply to be fellows and receive training and opportunities to participate in field work.

Additional Resources

Other Organizations

  • BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action: https://www.beacon-center.org/ 
    The BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action is an NSF Science and Technology Center founded with the mission of illuminating and harnessing the power of evolution in action to advance science and technology and benefit society.

  • National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT): https://www.nabt.org/
    The National Association of Biology Teachers empowers educators to provide the best possible biology and life science education for all students.

  • National Center for Science Education (NCSE): https://ncse.com/
    NCSE is a nonprofit that “defends the integrity of science education against ideological interference. We work with teachers, parents, scientists, and concerned citizens at the local, state, and national levels to ensure that topics including evolution and climate change are taught accurately, honestly, and confidently.”

  • Society for the Advancement of Chicanos/Hispanics and Native Americans in Science (SACNAS): http://sacnas.org/
    SACNAS is “an inclusive organization dedicated to fostering the success of Chicano/Hispanic and Native American scientists, from college students to professionals, in attaining advanced degrees, careers, and positions of leadership in STEM.”

International Evolution Education Organisations

EvoKE: EvoKE aims to assess Europe's understanding of evolution and form a collaborative platform for new projects.

Campaign for Science and Engineering (CaSE): The Campaign for Science and Engineering (CaSE) is the UK’s leading independent advocate for science and engineering. Our mission is to ensure that the UK has the skills, funding and policies to enable science and engineering to thrive.

Humanists UK lead a campaign to get teaching of ‘evolution not creationism’ into the National Curriculum and the teaching of this subject to primary as well as high school children. Their campaign succeeded and was adopted into the National Curriculum in 2015.


View full page

The Evolution annual meetings are held jointly by the Society for the Study of Evolution, the American Society of Naturalists and the Society of Systematic Biologists. 

Next Meeting:
Evolution 2013
Meeting and Conference Center
Snowbird, Utah, USA
June 21-25, 2013 Add text here ...

Past Meetings
2003 - Chico, CA
2004 - Fort Collins, CO
2005 - Fairbanks, AK
2006 - Stony Brook, NY
2007 - Christchurch, NZ
2008 - Minneapolis, Minnesota
2009 - Moscow, Idaho
2010 - Portland, OR
2011 - Norman, OK
2012 - Ottawa

 


View full page

View full page
Coming soon…

View full page

Editor’s Reports

Evolution, Volume 65, 2011


View full page

Dear SSE Membership,

I hope you’ve recovered sufficiently from what can only be described as a fabulous annual meeting in Ottawa.  I write to update you on a few issues of relevance to the SSE membership and, as always, to ask you informally to let us know if you have thoughts as to how the Society could improve its service to its members.  I also wanted to let you know that the trouble we were experiencing with online access to Evolution has been resolved. 

Most importantly, here’s an update on our upcoming annual meetings. Save the date!! Next year we will meet in Snowbird, Utah from June 21-25.  The meeting organization is in the capable hands of past SSE Executive Vice President Charlie Fenster and details will be posted on the SSE web site soon.

In 2014, we will meet in Raleigh, North Carolina from 20 – 25 June for a meeting co-organized by the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent).  This will be NESCent’s last year of funding from NSF and we look forward to celebrating its remarkable contributions to the evolutionary community and beyond, and to helping it navigate its future.

Beyond 2014 we have no firm commitments for our annual meetings, so please step up if you are at all interested! There is a possibility under consideration that the 2015 meetings will be held in Brazil, but it is not confirmed yet. One of my goals as SSE President was to increase the international impact of the Society and help build bridges with nations where evolutionary studies are growing.  SSE has an important role to play in the advancement of evolutionary biology globally, and indeed we already support many overseas activities of nascent evolution societies and workshops through our international program.  Our last truly ‘overseas’ meeting was in New Zealand in 2007 and we expect to have in place some funding for US and other graduate students to attend any overseas meeting we organize, because we recognize that such meetings can be costly to one of our key constituents, graduate students. So stay tuned.

The results of several awards given out at the annual meeting in Ottawa are now posted on the SSE web site http://www.evolutionsociety.org/awards.asp.  Congratulations again to our award winners!  Also, the a complete video of the 2012 address by David Quammen, the 2012 Stephen Jay Gould Award winner, is available on the web site.  Take a moment to listen and watch again the many inspiring messages from this address.  The SSE council is currently discussing and exploring possible ways to involve graduate students in the council's activities and deliberations.  The Council envisions graduate students as an excellent and long-overdue conduit to the opinions and perspectives of our student members, which form the bulk of SSE membership. 

In other news, Evolution Editor-in-Chief Daphne Fairbairn has summarized the activities of the journal for 2011 and this REPORT has been placed on www.evolutionsociety.org behind the member log in.  There are some really interesting trends and perspectives in this Editor’s report, so I encourage you to take a look.  One of our two handling editors, Lynda Delph, will be stepping down at the end of 2012, and Jeff Conner from Michigan State University has accepted our invitation to fill this position for the coming three years.  Jeff studies plant evolutionary genetics and genomics, and the journal will benefit from his expertise.  We thank Jeff for his willingness to serve in this important capacity.

As always the Society is challenged by membership issues and competes with the many other ways in which members can spend their funds and time.  The current membership is 2590 and, while stable over the last few years, this number waxes and wanes with the location of the annual meeting.  For example, our membership numbers are up over 100 members from last year at this time, perhaps in part due to the exciting draw of the Ottawa meeting.  The SSE Council is keenly aware that the Society needs to deliver attractive products and services for its membership if we are to retain members and remain viable, and in addition to publishing Evolution and organizing the annual meeting we are constantly searching for ways to serve the membership better (for example, through research awards for graduate students).  We welcome your suggestions and look forward to another year of growth and exciting scholarly exchange for SSE!

Best wishes,
Scott

Scott Edwards  |  President
Society for the Study of Evolution
SSE Business Office 4475 Castleman Avenue
www.evolutionsociety.org


View full page

Dear SSE Colleagues:

We have checked our records and found that you HAVE NOT RENEWED your membership in the Society for the Study of Evolution for 2012.  I encourage you to renew today to continue to receive SSE member benefits such as our e-newsletters, updates, discounted meeting registration, access to Evolution, and SSE awards.  Take a few moments and renew online right now: https://payments.evolutionsociety.org/joinsse/


The First Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology (aka ‘Evolution 2012’), will be held July 6-10 in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.   This landmark event will bring together five of the world’s largest academic societies devoted to the study of ecology and evolutionary biology: theAmerican Society of Naturalists (ASN), the Canadian Society for Ecology and Evolution (CSEE) the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB), the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE), and the Society of Systematic Biologists (SSB). Please visit the web site to register online: https://www.signup4.net/Public/ap.aspx?EID=EVOL11E

You can also view the terrific line-up of Symposia along with their organizers and speakers at: http://www.confersense.ca/Evolution2012/symposia.htm

To view a brief program to help with your travel planning, visit: http://www.confersense.ca/Evolution2012/program.htm

Just a reminder of two Society benefits that may be helpful to you as we enter these summer months. First, you can find issues of Evolution online by logging in with your SSE username and password at: www.evolutionsociety.org

Finally, remember to submit jobs and look for openings on our job board online.  We receive new postings every week. www.evolutionsociety.org/jobs.asp

Hope to see you all this summer in Ottawa for a fantastic venue and learning opportunity!

Best regards,
Scott

Scott Edwards  |  President
Society for the Study of Evolution
SSE Business Office 4475 Castleman Avenue
www.evolutionsociety.org


View full page

12/11/2012

Dear SSE Colleagues:

There are a number of items to bring to the attention of SSE members before the year closes.  First, I thank those who have renewed their SSE membership for next year.  If you have not already done so, please do make certain that you have renewed your membership by December 31, lest you lose access to Evolution online come January 1.  Renewing now before the end of the year provides you with uninterrupted benefitsand ensures that you are on the mailing lists for our e-newsletters and for Evolution in print.  RENEW ONLINE NOW:  https://payments.evolutionsociety.org/joinsse/

Election Results and More:
I would like to extend my congratulations to the winners of the 2013 Election.  Your new SSE President will be, Mohamed A. F. NoorBiology Department, Duke University. Elected to the SSE Council are Luke Harmon, University of Idaho and Kim Hughes,Florida State University.  Thank you to all who voted.  We had a great turnout for the election!  I would also like to announce that Dr. Ruth Shaw from the University of Minnesota will be taking over as Editor of Evolution from Daphne Fairbairn in July.  We thank Daphne for her years of service and diligent work to take Evolution to an even higher level of global recognition.

NAS Colloquium:
The National Academy of Sciences is hosting a meeting this January 10-12, 2013 in Irvine, California that many of you will be interested in attending.  In the Light of Evolution VII: The Human Mental Machinery  will bring together leading scientists who have worked on several aspects of human morals and aesthetics considered as mental traits, their evolution, and their relationship with related behaviors in other primates.

Call for Early Career Nominations:
The Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Michigan invites nominations of outstanding scientists early in their careers to take part in an exciting international symposium on the conceptual and methodological integration of paleontological and phylogenetic approaches to the study of macroevolution. The symposium events will take place from 15-17 March 2013, in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Nine early-career scientists will be selected to present their work alongside two plenary speakers and participate in panel discussions. We welcome nominations of scientists who are studying any aspect of macroevolution using paleontological, molecular phylogenetic, or theoretical approaches. We are especially interested in scientists whose work recognizes the promises and/or challenges of developing a unified neontological and paleontological framework for understanding macroevolutionary patterns.  Nominations are due by January 15.  More information is available at: http://sitemaker.umich.edu/ecss2013.

EVOLUTION 2013:
Save the date!! Next year we will meet in Snowbird, Utah from June 21-25.  We expect to open registration and the talk submission site in January.  The meeting organization is in the capable hands of past SSE Executive Vice President Charlie Fenster and details have begun to be posted on the meeting web site.  Visit the site to learn more about student volunteer opportunities, the general program schedule, and sponsorship opportunities.  http://www.evolutionmeeting.org/

Thank you for your dedication and loyalty to the Society for the Study and Evolution.  Wishing you a very happy holiday season!

Best wishes,
Scott Edwards, President

 

11/16/2012

Dear SSE Colleagues:

Just a quick reminder to renew your SSE membership now before the busy holiday season. I hope you will take the time today to make a commitment to the Society and our mission for 2013. Renewing before the end of the year provides you with uninterrupted benefits and ensures that you are on the mailing lists for our e-newsletters and for Evolution in print. RENEW ONLINE NOW: https://payments.evolutionsociety.org/joinsse/

A few key points about SSE membership:
Membership dues remain at the same low rate as last year. ($20 for Students/K-12 Educators/Emeritus members and $40 for Professional members)
Online access to the journal is included with your membership dues
Evolution in print continues to be a terrific value ($40 for professional members and $20 for other membership types)
You may be interested to note that the Society puts the vast majority of dues and meeting revenue back into our mission through research and travel awards.
SSE members receive discounted registration rates to the annual Evolution meeting
Many awards are only available to SSE members

EVOLUTION 2013:
Save the date!! Next year we will meet in Snowbird, Utah from June 21-25. The meeting organization is in the capable hands of past SSE Executive Vice President Charlie Fenster and details have begun to be posted on the meeting web site: http://www.evolutionmeeting.org/

Thank you for your dedication and loyalty to the Society for the Study and Evolution. These are exciting times at the SSE and we want you to be a part of it. Please note the business contacts for the Society: Bill Dahl and Heather Cacanindin are ready to help with any membership questions you might have.

Best wishes,
Scott Edwards, President
Society for the Study of Evolution


10/25/2012

Dear SSE Colleagues:

First of all, I want to thank you for your past support of the Society for the Study of Evolution. Many of you joined us in Ottawa for a fantastic scientific meeting and we are planning another must-attend conference for you in Snowbird, Utah. You and your contributions to our field are the reason we have such a terrific mission-driven community and I thank you for that.  The time to renew your membership is now. I hope you will take the time today to make a commitment to the Society and our mission for 2013. Renewing before the end of the year provides you with uninterrupted benefits and ensures that you are on the mailing lists for our e-newsletters and for Evolution in print.  RENEW ONLINE NOW: https://payments.evolutionsociety.org/joinsse/

A few key points about SSE membership:
» Membership dues remain at the same low rate as last year. ($20 for Students/K-12 Educators/Emeritus members and $40 for Professional members)
» Online access to the journal is included with your membership dues
» Evolution in print continues to be a BARGAIN ($40 for professional members and $20 for other membership types)
» You may be interested to note that the Society puts the vast majority of dues and meeting revenue back into our mission through research and travel awards.
» SSE members receive discounted registration rates to the annual Evolution meeting
» Many awards are only available to SSE members

GIFT MEMBERSHIPS:
To assist in the continued growth of the Society we encourage your efforts to recruit new student members from your labs and classrooms. To help make your recruiting easier, we have added the ability to give a student a NEW membership for only $10 when you renew your own membership online. Look at the students around you and give a gift membership or two this year. We also invite you to take advantage of the opportunity of giving gift associate memberships to colleagues from developing countries at the rate of $10. This is an easy way to introduce promising young professionals to our community. In addition, student memberships are just $20 for those that join on their own, so please pass along the news about what a valuable membership SSE provides.  We would certainly like to grow our student population, so please consider this invitation.

EVOLUTION 2013:
Save the date!! Next year we will meet in Snowbird, Utah from June 21-25.  The meeting organization is in the capable hands of past SSE Executive Vice President Charlie Fenster and details will be posted on the SSE web site soon.

EVOLUTION 2012 WRAP-UP:
The results of several awards given out at the annual meeting in Ottawa are now posted on the SSE web site.  Just click on the AWARDS tab near the top and select an award to visit.  Congratulations again to our award winners!  Also, the a complete video of the 2012 address by David Quammen, the 2012 Stephen Jay Gould Award winner, is available on the web site.  Take a moment to listen and watch again the many inspiring messages from this address.  The SSE council is currently discussing and exploring possible ways to involve graduate students in the council's activities and deliberations.  The Council envisions graduate students as an excellent and long-overdue conduit to the opinions and perspectives of our student members, which form the bulk of SSE membership. 

Thank you for your dedication and loyalty to the Society for the Study and Evolution. These are exciting times at the SSE and we want you to be a part of it. Please note the business contacts for the Society: Bill Dahl and Heather Cacanindin are ready to help with any membership questions you might have.

Best wishes,
Scott Edwards, President
Society for the Study of Evolution

SSE Business Office
4475 Castleman Avenue  |  St. Louis Missouri, 63110-3201
314-577-9566
www.evolutionsociety.org


View full page
12 November, 2013

Dear SSE Colleagues:

First of all, I want to thank you for your past support of the Society for the Study of Evolution. This is a reminder to renew your membership now.  Renewing before year's end will provide you with uninterrupted benefits and ensure that you receiveEvolution in print as well as Society newsletters.  For the first time in many years, membership dues for the Society have increased slightly.  However, membership remains very inexpensive, and your dues help support the many wonderful benefits that the Society brings to all of us: the highly-ranked journal Evolution, a scientifically diverse and stimulating annual conference, and some important and valuable opportunities for awards and travel grants. 

PLEASE RENEW ONLINE NOW

A few key points about SSE membership:
Membership dues remain at very reasonable rates, just $25 for Students and $50 for Professional members.
Online access to Evolution is included with your membership dues.
Evolution in print continues to be a bargain at just $75 for delivery of 12 issues.
SSE members receive discounted registration rates to the annual Evolution meeting.
SSE members also receive many other benefits described here
The Society puts the majority of dues and meeting revenues back into our missionthrough research and travel awards.  Many of these awards are available only to SSEmembers.

GIFT MEMBERSHIPS:
To assist in the continued growth of the Society, we encourage you to recruit new student members from your labs and classrooms.  Did you know that you can give a student a NEW membership for only $10 when you renew your own membership online?  Wow!  Look at the students around you and give a gift membership or two this year!  We want to grow our student population, so please consider this special invitation.  We also invite you to take advantage of the opportunity of giving gift associate memberships to colleagues from developing countries, also at the low rate of $10.  This is an easy and amazing way to introduce new members to our community. 

EVOLUTION 2014:
Save the date!  Next year the Society will meet in Raleigh, North Carolina, from June 20-24.  The meeting organization is in the capable hands of our friends at NESCent, and details are already being posted on the conference area of the SSE web site.  It promises to be must-attend conference, and I hope to see you there!

Thank you for your dedication and loyalty to the Society for the Study of Evolution.  These are exciting times for the Society and for the study of evolution, and we want you to be a part of our activities.  Please note the business contacts for the Society:  Bill Dahl and Heather Cacanindin are ready to help with any membership questions that you might have.

 


10 September, 2013

Dear SSE Colleagues:

SSE Announces New Latin American Interest Group
EVOLAT is an interest group, started by SSE members, intended to promote Latin American research on evolution within the SSE. EVOLAT offers the opportunity for researchers and their ideas to come together together to reinforce and advance the study of evolution in this region.  A Latin American mixer is in the works for EVOLUTION 2014 in Raleigh.  EVOLAT will work to:
1. Bring together scientists with interests in advancing research and teaching of evolution across Latin American institutions
2. Encourage participation of Latin American researchers by recruiting professionals and students as new members of the SSE.
3. Promote involvement of Latin American researchers in the activities of the SSE.
4. Represent a portal for Latin American scientists to promote scientific interactions and foster professional collaborations with scientists from North America and around the world.
5. Organize workshops and/or mini-courses, either during Evolution meetings or in Latin America.
For more information please visit www.uta.edu/faculty/pinzon/EVOLAT, like us on Facebook (www.facebook.com/evolat), or contact Jorge H. Pinzón (pinzon@uta.edu) or Jorge L. Hurtado-Gonzalez (jorge.hurtado@uc.edu)

SSE Awards Accepting Nominations/Submissions
Start thinking about nominations for 2014 Society awards.  The Society for the Study of Evolution’s Committee for the Stephen J. Gould Prize for the Improvement for the Understanding of Evolution is soliciting nominations for the Award for 2014.  The award includes a prize of $5,000, and the recipient will present the Public Outreach Seminar at the Evolution Meeting (expenses for travel/lodging and registration to be covered by the SSE). The nomination deadline for this award is <span data-term="goog_1165969019" tabindex="0">December 18, 2013

A number of other awards have deadlines in January and February, so now is the time to begin thinking about nominations and working on submissions.

The 2014 SSE Annual Meeting
And speaking of next year, the next SSE annual meeting will take place from  June 20-24, 2014 , in Raleigh, North Carolina.  NESCent, the National Evolutionary Science Center, is organizing the Evolution 2014 meeting.  Registration will open in January.

Make your plans now to join us in Raleigh next June!

Best wishes,
Richard Lenski, President
Society for the Study of Evolution

 


12 August 2013

Dear SSE Colleagues:

It was wonderful seeing so many of you at our annual meeting in Snowbird, Utah!  The conference was a huge success in every respect. 

On behalf of all the attendees, I extend our heartfelt thanks to all those who organized the meeting including especially SSE members Charlie Fenster, Michele Dudash, and Mitch Cruzan as well as Caitlan Lee, Johanne Stogran and Heather Cacanindin, who provided support, and the staff at Snowbird!

The two most important functions of the SSE are the annual meetings and our flagship journal Evolution. For the past three years, Daphne Fairbairn was the editor-in-chief of Evolution, and she did an absolutely superb job.  Daphne’s term ended in June, and so on behalf of all SSE members: Thank you for your tremendous service!  We also welcome Ruth Shaw as the new editor-in-chief.  

Let me mention a few special highlights from the Snowbird meeting.  Jenny Boughman and Michele Dudash organized a lunch-time discussion on Women in Science that drew ~200 attendees.  They’ve provided a write-up with lots of excellent ideas for all of us.

There was also a successful Student Mixer with almost 200 attendees. SSE Grad Student Representative Cathy Rushworth and President-Elect Mohamed Noor organized the event to solicit ideas on how the Society can better serve and involve its large and active student membership.

The SSE presented several awards at the Snowbird meeting.  You can read about the winners of the Stephen Jay Gould Prize, Judy Scotchmoor; Theodosius Dobzhansky Prize, Rowan Barrett; and the R. A. Fisher Prize, Will Soto; and see the recipients of the W. D. Hamilton and Rosemary Grant Awards. Congratulations to all these winners!

You can start thinking about nominations for next year’s awards as well.

And speaking of next year, the next SSE annual meeting will take place from June 20-24, 2014, in Raleigh, North Carolina.  Registration will open in January.  NESCent, the National Evolutionary Science Center, is organizing the Evolution 2014 meeting.

I hope to see you in Raleigh next June!

Richard Lenski, President
Society for the Study of Evolution

 


June 6, 2013

Dear SSE Colleagues:

EVOLUTION 2013: 
This year SSE will meet in Snowbird, Utah, from June 21-25.  The complete online program is available for your perusal. Or for a higher-level view, take a look at thesymposia and colloquia.  A few highlights -

  • New Molecular Approaches to Species Delimitation
  • Tree of Life Symposium
  • Ecology, Evolution and coevolution of host-parasite interactions
  • The role of field expeditions in modern evolutionary biology
  • Young Investigator Symposium
  • iEvoBio on June 25-26
  • Gould Award Lecture: Keeping Science as the Centerpiece: Lessons Learned
  • Everything you wanted to know about evolution but never thought to ask

Registration is still open HERE.  For an overview of the meeting, student volunteer opportunities, the general program schedule, and sponsorship opportunities, please visit  http://www.evolutionmeeting.org/  There are several options for lodging in theSnowbird Alpine Village and for camping in the Little Cottonwood Canyon.  Several room types are offered in the Village.  Rooms with special features (balconies, fire places, etc.) as well as studios and condos have limited availability, and are booked on a first-come basis. 

SSE STUDENT MIXER:
SSE will hold a graduate student meeting and mixer at Evolution 2013 onSaturday, June 22 at 5-6 p.m. At this meeting, SSE President-Elect Mohamed Noor and Student Representative Cathy Rushworth will be soliciting you for suggestions and feedback on how the Society can better serve its graduate student membership. This event will also lead to the formation of the graduate student advisory committee, so please consider joining us!  The mixer directly precedes the SSE Presidential Address and Society meeting.

ROSEMARY GRANT GRADUATE STUDENT AWARDS:
Congratulations to all 32 winners of the Rosemary Grant Student Research Awards!  We had such a large number of high quality applicants this year.  The Rosemary Grant Student Research Awards target students in the first two years of their Ph.D. programs with  an award ranging from $1,500 - $2500.

CAREER OPPORTUNITIES:
Did you know that SSE has a job board on our web site?  Please submit your career opportunities and visit this site first as a great resource for making your next move. 

EVOLUTION Journal News
We’ve made it easier for you to find articles from back issues of Evolution from theSSE website.  After you’ve logged on as a member, you can get any issue from 2000 onward via the link to the Wiley page, and you can get older volumes by following the JSTOR link.

Thank you for your involvement with the Society for the Study of Evolution.  I hope to see you in a few weeks in Snowbird, Utat!


Best wishes,
Richard Lenski, President
Society for the Study of Evolution

 


March 1, 2013

Dear SSE Colleagues:

Read on for recent news about awards and grants as well as the upcoming EVOLUTION meeting this summer.

EVOLUTION 2013 Registration OPENS
This year SSE will meet in Snowbird, Utah, from June 21-25.  This is the premier opportunity to share scientific research on evolution. Early registration deadline and presentation submission deadline is April 19. Registration is open HERE.  For an overview of the meeting, student volunteer opportunities, the general program schedule, and sponsorship opportunities, please visit  http://www.evolutionmeeting.org/  There are several options for lodging in the Snowbird Alpine Village and for camping in the Little Cottonwood Canyon.  Several room types are offered in the Village.  Rooms with special features (balconies, fire places, etc.) as well as studios and condos have limited availability, and are booked on a first-come basis, so reserve early.  The facility is accepting reservations for our meeting now, and you can learn more by clicking HERE.

ROSEMARY GRANT GRADUATE STUDENT AWARDS:
The Rosemary Grant Student Research Awards for students in the first two yearsof their Ph.D. programs has an upcoming deadline of April 1.  Awards will range from $1,500 - $2500 and approximately twenty awards will be made. Visit the SSE website to learn more.

SSE Student Representative Selected:
Over the last year, the SSE Council has been discussing possible ways to increase the involvement of graduate students in planning for the SSE's future.  Cathy Rushworth, a graduate student at Duke University, has generously volunteered to spearhead the initial efforts by soliciting ideas and advice from student members and presenting them at future SSE Council meetings.  To facilitate these discussions, the SSE will host agraduate-student mixer at the Snowbird meeting, where students can hear some thoughts from SSE President-Elect Mohamed Noor and then discuss your ideas with Cathy.  If you are a student member of SSE, stay tuned for occasional emails from Cathy.

Nominations for SSE Offices
SSE’s nominating committee is now accepting nominations for council membersand officers to begin serving in 2014. To nominate someone for the Council, President, North American Vice President, non-North American Vice President, or Executive Vice-President, please submit by March 30 the name and contact information of the nominee, preferably with a short statement explaining why you think your nominee would serve SSE well in his or her capacity. Click HERE to make your nominations. 

EVOLUTION Journal News
We’ve made it easier for you to find articles from back issues of Evolution from theSSE website.  After you’ve logged on as a member, you can get any issue from 2000 onward via the link to the Wiley page, and you can get older volumes by following the JSTOR link.

GOULD AWARD:
Congratulations to Judy Scotchmoor, who has been selected as this year’s winner of the Stephen Jay Gould Prize!  This award recognizes individuals for sustained and exemplary efforts to advance public understanding of evolutionary science and its importance in biology, education, and everyday life.  Judy is the assistant director for outreach and education at the University of California Museum of Paleontology.  She will speak about her work at this year's SSE annual meeting.

EVOLUTION 2013 MSI Faculty Travel Award
The National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent), with support from the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE), is pleased to announce travel awards for faculty from Minority Serving Institutions to attend Evolution 2013, as part of continuing outreach efforts focusing on groups that are under-represented in evolutionary science.  If you are a faculty member at an MSI, HBCU or other institution with significant enrollment of under-represented minority students, you are encouraged to apply.  Funds are available to cover conference registration, travel, food and lodging.  Application Deadline: April 5th, (Awards will be announced by April 12th, 2013) To apply, please visit www.nescent.org/Evo2013facultyapp

Graduate Student Travel Awards to attend "World Congress on Evolution III" 
The National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (NESCent - www.nescent.org) is sponsoring two travel awards to enable Evolutionary Science graduate students to attend the third "World Congress on Evolution" (www.usfq.edu.ec/eventos/evosummit), which will be held from June 1-5, 2013 on the Galapagos Island of San Cristobal.  These awards are part of NESCent's continuing outreach efforts to serve members of groups that are under-represented/under-served in evolutionary science, as defined by the National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd).  As such, application is restricted to graduate students who are: American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino/Latina, and/or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander.  Travel awards cover travel/food/lodging/conference registration.  Application Deadline: April 1.  To apply, please visit www.nescent.org/galapagos-travel-award

Thank you for your involvement with the Society for the Study of Evolution.  I hope to see you this summer in Snowbird, Utah!

Best wishes,
Richard Lenski, President
Society for the Study of Evolution

SSE Business Office
PO Box 299  |  St. Louis Missouri, 63166
314-577-9566

www.evolutionsociety.org

 


 

January 15, 2013

Dear SSE Colleagues:

Happy New Year to all, and a special welcome to our new members! Your SSE Council has recently met and we are looking forward to a busy and exciting year ahead.

EVOLUTION Journal News
I am pleased to announce that Ruth Shaw from the University of Minnesota will be taking over as Editor-in-Chief of Evolution from Daphne Fairbairn in July. We thank Daphne for her outstanding work and dedicated service on behalf of Evolution and our society. Thanks also to Lynda Delph for her excellent service as a handling editor over the past three years, and to Jennifer Mahar who has been the superb managing editor for many years. Also, we’ve made it easier for you to find articles from back issues of Evolution from the SSE website. After you’ve logged on as a member, you can get any issue from 2000 onward via the link to the Wiley page, and you can get older volumes by following the JSTOR link.

EVOLUTION 2013 Meeting News
Save the date! This year SSE will meet in Snowbird, Utah, from June 21-25. This is the premier opportunity to share scientific research on evolution. There will be symposia, contributed papers, and poster sessions, and we’re expecting around 1,500 participants. We plan to open the registration and abstract submission sites by the end of this month. The meeting organization is in the capable hands of past SSE Executive Vice President Charlie Fenster, and details have begun to be posted on the meeting web site. Visit the site to learn more about student volunteer opportunities, the general program schedule, and sponsorship opportunities. http://www.evolutionmeeting.org/

There are several options for lodging in the Snowbird Alpine Village and for camping in the Little Cottonwood Canyon. Several room types are offered in the Village. Rooms with special features (balconies, fire places, etc.) as well as studios and condos have limited availability, and are booked on a first-come basis, so reserve early. The facility is accepting reservations for our meeting now, and you can learn more by clicking HERE.

As in previous years, there will be various awards and prizes, including the W. D. Hamilton Award for Outstanding Student Presentation at the 2013 meeting, the Rosemary Grant Student Research Awards for students in the first two years of their Ph.D. programs, and the R. A. Fisher Prize for an outstanding Ph.D. dissertation paper published in Evolution during 2012. You can find out more about these and other awards, including application details and deadlines, under the AWARDS tab at the SSE website.

Thank you for your involvement with the Society for the Study of Evolution. I hope to see you this summer in Snowbird, Utah!

Best wishes,
Richard Lenski, President
Society for the Study of Evolution


View full page

View full page

SSE Education and Outreach

SSE is involved in the organization and funding of a number of education and outreach efforts. The Education and Outreach Committee is responsible for funding these efforts and presenting these efforts at annual meetings. Programs include the Darwin Day Roadshow, the Evolution Film Festival, travel grants for undergraduate students to attend the annual Evolution meeting, a small grants program, and the TH Huxley Award to recognize education and outreach efforts by mid-career scientists. Read more about each program below.

Links to other programs, societies, and resources can be found on the Education & Outreach Resources page.

View the current committee membership.

 

Education and Outreach Committee

The Education & Outreach Committee was established in 1997. The Committee sponsors outreach to educators and the general public through annual presentations at the National Association of Biology Teachers, the Society for the Advancement of Chicanos and Native American in Science (SACNAS), and symposia and workshops at the annual meetings of the SSE. The Committee also supports SSE members for outreach activities (see Awards and Grants below).

 

Outreach Programs Funded by SSE


Darwin Day Roadshow: A yearly program where scientists and educators work together to bring evolutionary science to schools, museums, and town halls in communities around the country. Learn more.

Evolution Film Festival: A contest for creative short films about evolution in which the top-ranked films are shown and voted on at the annual Evolution conference. Learn more.

Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution: A program for undergraduate students from diverse backgrounds that includes travel funding to attend the annual Evolution conference and participate in various professional development opportunities. Learn more.

 

SSE Teaching Awards & Grants


Small Grants Program for Local and Regional Outreach Promoting the Understand of Evolutionary Biology: This program funds local and regional educational outreach activities each year. It is our hope that these projects will lead to ongoing outreach collaboration in future years. Preference will be given to new collaborations, but extensions of previously projects that have evidence of success are allowed. Learn more.

TH Huxley Award: This award, named in honor of Darwin's very public supporter T. H. Huxley, was established in 2013 to recognise outreach and education achievement for early and mid career scientists. Learn more.


View full page


Stephen Jay Gould Prize 

The Stephen Jay Gould Prize is awarded annually by the Society for the Study of Evolution to recognize individuals whose sustained and exemplary efforts have advanced public understanding of evolutionary science and its importance in biology, education, and everyday life in the spirit of Stephen Jay Gould. 


 

Thomas Henry Huxley Award

This award named in honor of Darwin's very public supporter T. H. Huxley, was established in 2013 to recognise outreach and education achievement for early and mid career scientists.  Winners of this award are provided with support to present on behalf of the Society for the Study of Evolution at the annual meeting of the National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT).  Annual calls for nomination will be advertised on the SSE web site and through appropriate Evolutionary Biology web sources such as EVOLDIR in late January/early February. 

Previous Winners


 2013 awardee
Dr. William Ratcliff,
University of Minnesota.
Information on the awarded work: [1] [2] [3]

 

 Small Grants Program for Local and Regional Outreach Promoting the Understanding of Evolutionary Biology

The SSE provides opportunities for SSE members to apply for awards up to $1,000.  Deadlines for applications are announced annually and usually take place in late October/early November.  Awards are announced in December.  The Committee encourages partnerships between other bodies engaged in outreach, such as museums, local schools, etc.

Previous Winners  

  

2012

Kaitlin Bonner
Oregon State University
OR, USA

Dale Broder
Colorado State University
CO, USA

Sarah Fitzpatrick
Colorado State University
CO, USA

Dr. Andrea Gloria-Soria
Yale University
CT, USA

John T. Lovell
Colorado State University
CO, USA

Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Michigan State University
MI, USA

Dr. Muaro Mandriolo
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
ITALY

Julia Spalding-Beegles
Denver Museum of Nature & Science
CO, USA

 


2011

Dr. Paula Cushing
Denver Museum of Natural History
CO, USA

Kevin Deitz
Texas A&M University
TX, USA

Sarah Eddy
Oregon State University 
OR, USA

Dr. Norman Johnson
University of Massachusets 
MA, USA

David Kikuchi
University of North Carolina 
NC, USA

Dr. Barbara Lundrigan 
Michigan State University 
MI, USA

Dr. Emilie Snell-Rood
University of Minnesota
MN, USA

Dr Philip Barnes
Connecticut College
CT, USA

 

 

2010


Dr. Clement Kent
York University
Ontario, CANADA

Dr. Levi Morran
Indiana University
IN, USA 

Aman Gill
Stony Brook University
NY, USA

Dr Jim Smith
Lyman Briggs College
MI, USA

Alexandra Sá Pinto and Dr. Rita Campos
CIBIO-UP (ICETA) 
PORTUGAL

 


2009

Dr. Juan Arroyo
Universidad de Seville
SPAIN

Dr. Luciano Javier Avila
Centro Nacional Patagonico
ARGENTINA

Dr. Alex Badyaev 
University of Arizona
AZ, USA

Dr. Peter Berendzen
University of Northern Iowa
IA, USA

Dr. Paula Cushing 
Denver Museum of Nature & Science
CO, USA

Dr. Dany Garant 
Université de Sherbrooke 
Quebec, CANADA

Dr. Root Gorelick
Carleton University
Ontario, CANADA

Dr. Stephen Heard 
University of New Brunswick
New Brunswick, CANADA

Dr. Valentina Islas 
University of St Andrews
UNITED KINGDOM

Dr. Christopher Ivey 
California State University
CA, USA

Kimberley Kandros 
North Carolina Museum of Natural Science
NC, USA

Dr. Jeremy Kirchman 
New York State Museum
NY, USA

Dr. Richard Kliman 
Cedar Crest College
PA, USA

Dr. Sophie Lardy 
Société Écologique à Responsabilité Limitée
FRANCE

Dr. Enrique Lessa 
Universidad de la República
URUGUAY

Dr. Barbara Lundrigan 
Michigan State University
MI, USA

Tara Maginness 
St Edwards University 
TX, USA

Dr. Louise Mead 
National Centre for Science Education
CA, USA

Dr. Francesc Mestres 
Universitat de Barcelona
SPAIN

Dr John Niedzwiecki 
Belmont University
TN, USA

Erik Pietrowicz 
University of Southern Maine
ME, USA

Dr. Margaret Ptacek 
Clemson University
SC, USA

Dr. Rosie Redfield 
University of British Columbia 
British Columbia, CANADA

Dr. Ingo Schlupp 
University of Oklahoma
OK, USA

Dr. Antonio Guillén 
Servent Instituto de Ecología, A. C.
MEXICO

Dr. Nancy Staub 
Gonzaga University
WA, USA

Dr. Richard Thomas 
Southern Illinois University
IL, USA

Dr. Lisa Wallace 
Mississippi University
MI, USA


View full page


December 11, 2014

Dear SSE Colleagues:

Congratulations and thanks to our newly elected Council members!
President-elect Kim Hughes (Florida State, will serve as president in 2016)
Secretary Cynthia Weinig (University of Wyoming)
Councilor Andrea Case (Kent State University)
Councilor Kristi Montooth (University of Nebraska)

Additionally, special thanks to Maria Servedio (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), who will serve as a new Handling Editor for Evolution. Extra special thanks to Council members who are rotating off this year: Rich Lenski (president in 2013, who gave an outstanding speech that year in Snowbird), John Kelly (extremely dutiful secretary who also kept the 2014 president in check whenever possible), and Councilors Aneil Agrawal and Judith Mank. Thanks also to Thomas Lenormand for his service as a Handling Editor for Evolution.

To let you know what's been accomplished this year, here are some SSE Highlights from 2014 beyond the usual (publishing great science in Evolution, recognizing outstanding young scientists with the Dobzhansky & Fisher prizes, etc.):

  • $54,000 given for 22 Rosemary Grant research awards to PhD students
  • $20,000 to support 16 researchers from low-GDP countries to attend the Evolution 2014 conference in Raleigh
  • Special committee formed and generated recommendations for future actions by the SSE regarding preparing students for diverse career options in evolutionary biology (more info forthcoming)
  • Allocated $100,000 for student travel awards for Evolution 2015 in Brazil (applications invited soon-- watch your e-mail for this and other graduate-student-related news)
  • Cosponsored Evolution 2014 About Women in Science events and committed efforts to team addressing diversity in society activities (assessing past and strategizing future)
  • Sponsored mixer at Evolution 2014 for "EvoLat", supporting research in and connections associated with Latin American countries
  • Finalizing contract for new journal EVOLUTION LETTERS, jointly sponsored by ESEB, with anticipated launch in 2015
  • Participation in numerous education & outreach activities, including successful education symposium at Evolution 2014 and awarding small grants
  • Participation in CourseSource as well as setting up new online educational resource EvoEd
  • Video recorded 77 talks from Evolution 2014 conference, and made available online HERE

SSE Awards Accepting Nominations/Submissions
There are a number of deadlines upcoming for SSE Awards.
Stephen Jay Gould Prize - December 18
Fisher Prize - January 31
Dobzhansky Prize - February 15
Rosemary Grant Research Award - April 1

The 2015 SSE Annual Meeting
Save the dates of <span data-term="goog_320977621" tabindex="0">June 26-30, 2015 for the next SSE annual meeting which will take place at the Casa Grande Resort in Guarujá, Brazil.  We anticipate that registration will open in January.  Some information is already being posted at the EVOLUTION 2015 meeting site. 

Watch for announcements regarding student travel awards in January!

Thank you for your continued work and support of our mission.

Best wishes,
Mohamed Noor, President
Society for the Study of Evolution
SSE Business Office
PO Box 299  |  St. Louis Missouri, 63166
314-577-9566
www.evolutionsociety.org
 


 SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF EVOLUTION


November 5, 2014

Dear SSE Colleagues:

First of all, I want to thank you for your past support of the Society for the Study of Evolution. This is a reminder to renew your membership now.  Membership remains very inexpensive, and your dues help support the many wonderful benefits that the Society brings to all of us: the highly-ranked journal Evolution, a scientifically diverse and stimulating annual conference, and some important and valuable opportunities for awards and student travel grants. 

PLEASE RENEW ONLINE NOW

A few key points about SSE membership:
* Membership dues remain at very reasonable rates, just $25 for Students and $50 for Professional members.
* Online access to Evolution is included with your membership dues.
* Evolution in print continues to be a bargain at just $75 for delivery of 12 issues.
* SSE members receive discounted registration rates to the annual Evolution meeting.
* SSE members also receive many other benefits described here

The Society puts the majority of dues and meeting revenues back into our missionthrough research and travel awards as well as educational and outreach activities.  SSE spent over $100,000 just on student awards in 2013, and that amount has increased -- we have budgeted $100,000 just for student travel awards to the 2015 annual meeting, in addition to our other student-centered awards (e.g., Rosemary Grant awards and prizes listed below).

SSE Election

The election is currently underway.  Winning candidates will serve beginning on January 1, 2015. Voting will close on Friday, November 14.  If you have not cast your ballot, please VOTE NOW.

SSE Awards Accepting Nominations/Submissions
Start thinking about nominations for 2015 Society awards.  The Society for the Study of Evolution’s Committee for the Stephen Jay Gould Prize for the Improvement for the Understanding of Evolution is soliciting nominations for the Award for 2015.  The award includes a prize of $5,000, and the recipient will present the Public Outreach Seminar at the Evolution Meeting in Brazil (expenses for travel/lodging and registration to be covered by the SSE). The nomination deadline for this award is December 18, 2014.  A number of other awards have deadlines in January and February, so now is the time to begin thinking about nominations and working on submissions.
Fisher Prize - January 31
Dobzhansky Prize - February 15
Rosemary Grant Research Award - April 1

The 2015 SSE Annual Meeting
Save the dates of June 26-30, 2015 for the next SSE annual meeting which will take place at theCasa Grande Resort in Guarujá, Brazil.  We anticipate that registration will open in January.  Some information is already being posted at theEVOLUTION 2015 meeting site.

Thank you for your continued work and support of our mission!

Best wishes,
Mohamed Noor, President
Society for the Study of Evolution

SSE Business Office
PO Box 299  |  St. Louis Missouri, 63166
314-577-9566
www.evolutionsociety.org

 

August 27, 2014

Dear SSE Colleague:

I want to extend a big thank you to Allen Rodrigo & team for a phenomenal Evolution 2014 meeting. Videos of 78 of the  talks are online so if you could not attend, you can still get a taste of what the meeting was like. Mark your calendars now and plan to join us for EVOLUTION 2015June 26-30, 2015 at the Casa Grande Hotel, Guarujá, São Paulo, Brazil.  Remember that US citizens NEED TO GET A VISA ~1-2 months in advance to travel to Brazil.  Save the date for EVOLUTION 2016: June 17-21 in Austin, Texas.

IMPORTANT SOCIETY ITEMS

  • $100K has been allocated for SSE student member travel awards for Evolution 2015 (more information on this very soon - deadline will likely be in January 2015!)
  • A new committee has been formed and charged with making recommendations of effective strategies to facilitate exposing students to diverse career options.
  • Funds available for SSE student member travel to ESEB and other conferences - see THIS LINK for details on eligibility
  • New journal being planned jointly with ESEB: Evolution Letters

SSE STUDENT ADVISORY COUNCIL:
We welcome PhD student Karl Grieshop who joins us as an additional member of SSE Student Advisory Council (serving with Cathy Rushworth from Duke University, in her second year in this role). Karl works in Göran Arnqvist's lab at Uppsala University studying the architecture of sexually antagonistic genetic variation.  We will be seeking two more members to serve in 2015. 

NEW RESOURCE: EvoED DIGITAL LIBRARY
The EvoED Digital Library is a peer-reviewed online educational resource maintained by SSE. EvoED is part of a suite of resources established under the Digital Resource Discovery Project, with support from NSF and AAAS, and in partnership with the Ecological Society of America, the Botanical Society of America, and the Society for Economic Botany. While there are currently more than 1000 resources in the shared Digital Resource Library, most of the content to date has been acquired via the EcoED portal. SSE would like to see EvoED reach its potential as a resource for evolution educators, especially with regard to undergraduate instruction. To achieve this goal, the editors of EvoED, Tom Meagher and Rich Kliman, invite self-nominations for a newly established board of reviewers. At the same time, the editors invite educators to contribute evolution-focused content -- particularly exercises, computer simulations, and other tools that have been used successfully in the laboratory and classroom to help students better understand evolutionary principles. Prospective reviewers should contact Rich Kliman (rmkliman@cedarcrest.edu). Instructions for submitting original content to EvoED can be found at http://evoed.evolutionsociety.org.

All the best,

Mohamed Noor, President

Society for the Study of Evolution

SSE Business Office
4475 Castleman Avenue  |  St. Louis Missouri, 63110-3201
314-577-9566
www.evolutionsociety.org


 

June 2, 2014

Dear SSE Colleagues:

Happy summer 2014! We’re all really excited about the upcoming Evolution 2014 conference in Raleigh, NC, USA, starting June 20!  Below please find some important Society and meeting news.

Award Winners Announced
Daniel Matute of the University of Chicago (starting a faculty position at UNC-Chapel Hill in fall, 2014) was awarded the Society for the Study of Evolution’s 2014 Dobzhansky Prize. This award recognizes the accomplishments and future promise of an outstanding young evolutionary biologists. Daniel has already made seminal contributions to our understanding of the genetics and evolution underlying species formation. He’ll present an address at the 2014 conference entitled "Drosophila, reproductive isolation, and speciation," as well as a separate symposium talk entitled "The genetic architecture of hybrid inviability in Drosophila."

The winner of the 2014 Stephen Jay Gould Prize is Steve Jones of University College London. Professor J. Stephen Jones is well known in Britain and worldwide as an eloquent spokesperson for promoting the public understanding of science, particularly with regard to evolution. Steve Jones will deliver the Gould Prize Lecture at 5:30 PM on Friday, June 20th, 2014 in the Raleigh Convention Center Ballroom C. The title of his talk is “Snails in Art and the Art of Snails: An Evolutionist’s Journey Through Science and the Arts.”

The R. A. Fisher Prize is awarded annually by the Society for the Study of Evolution for an outstanding Ph.D. dissertation paper published in the journal Evolution during a given calendar year. This year’s Fisher Prize is awarded to Dr. Amy Hurford for her paper: Hurford, A. and T. Day. 2013.Immune evasion and the evolution of molecular mimicry in parasitesEvolution 67(10): 2889-2904.

Congratulations to the 22 graduate student winners of the Rosemary Grant Awards!  These awards assist students in the early stages of their Ph.D. programs by enabling them to collect preliminary data or to enhance the scope of their research beyond current funding limits.

EVOLUTION 2014- New Services
In the spirit of sharing and dissemination of scientific information, Evolution 2014 offers two new, voluntary services. First, presenters of talks or posters are welcome to upload their slides or poster to F1000 Posters, thereby allowing people to see to their content again after the conference dates. For more information, please visit this site. We advise submitters to consider whether F1000 Poster contributions could affect subsequent publication in a particular refereed journal. Second, more than 100 people offered to allow their conference talks to be videotaped and put online. This is an experimental service, so we appreciate everyone's patience as we try it for the first time. If you're a student who would like to volunteer to record some of the talks with your personal device (e.g., smartphone) in exchange for US$10 per recording, please provide your information HERE.

Call for Symposia for 2015 Annual Meeting
The 2015 annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Evolution is planned for June 26-30, 2015 in Guaruja, Brazil. The SSE Council invites proposals for the two Society-sponsored symposia to be held in conjunction with the meeting. To learn more or to submit a proposal, please visit our site.  The deadline is this Friday, June 6.

Looking forward to seeing many of you in Raleigh later this month.

Best wishes,
Mohamed Noor, President
Society for the Study of Evolution

SSE Business Office | PO Box 299  |  St. Louis Missouri, 63166 | 314-577-9566
www.evolutionsociety.org


 

Dear SSE Colleagues:



EVOLUTION 2014 Meeting News
Here are some upcoming deadlines for EVO 2014.
Join us in Raleigh, North Carolina on June 20-24.

  * April 14: undergraduate travel awards close
  * April 16: early-bird registration and presentation submission deadline
  * May 23: childcare registration deadline
  * May 31: deadline to enter the evolution film festival
  * late-May/early-June: complete program becomes available; stay tuned
  * June 1: cancellation deadline

Best wishes,
Mohamed Noor, President
Society for the Study of Evolution


 

Dear SSE Colleagues:



EVOLUTION 2014 Meeting News
Save the date!  This year SSE will meet in Raleigh, North Carolina on June 20-24.  This is the premier opportunity to share scientific research on evolution. There will be symposia, contributed papers, and poster sessions, and we’re expecting around 1,500 participants. NESCent, the National Evolutionary Science Center, is organizing the <a href="http://evolution2014.org/" moz-do-not-send="true">Evolution 2014 meeting.  So visit the web site for all the latest information.  Stay tuned for an email when registration opens and make your plans now to join us in Raleigh next June!

T.H. Huxley Award
The SSE Education & Outreach Committee is pleased to announce the T. H. Huxley award, named in honor of Darwin's very public supporter, which provides funding for an SSE member to present at the National Association of Biology Teachers annual conference.  If you have an interesting project or educational activity to share with high school, community college or undergraduate faculty, consider applying for this award. Graduate students and postdoctoral fellows are encouraged to apply.  This year’s conference will be held Nov 12-15 in Cleveland, OH.  The deadline for applying for the Huxley award is March 7.  Apply here: http://tinyurl.com/kzy8uvw

Rosemary Grant Research Awards
Now is the time to begin thinking about applications for the Rosemary Grant Research Award.  Awards will range from $1,500 - $2500 and approximately twenty awards will be made.  The Grant awards are to assist students in the early stages of their Ph.D (first two years) programs by enabling them to collect preliminary data or to enhance the scope of their research beyond current funding limits (e.g. by visiting additional field sites, or working at other labs). Deadline for the Rosemary Grant Research Award - April 1

EVOLUTION Journal News
Just a reminder that we have made it easy for you to find articles from back issues of Evolution from the SSE website.  After you’ve logged on as a member, you can get any issue from 2000 onward via the link to the Wiley page, and you can get older volumes by following the JSTOR link.  Have you checked out the research in the February issue yet?

Graduate Student Advisory Council
We will soon be looking to add a new member to the still-forming Graduate Student Advisory Council.  A separate email will go out to the graduate student membership shortly.  Be on the lookout and please consider volunteering your time to help shape your Society.

Give An SSE Gift Membership
To assist in the continued growth of the Society, we encourage you to recruit new student members from your labs and classrooms.  Did you know that you can give a student a NEW membership for only $10?  Look at the students around you and give a gift membership or two this year!  We want to grow our student population, so please consider this special invitation.  We also invite you to take advantage of the opportunity of giving gift associate memberships to colleagues from developing countries, also at the low rate of $10.  This is an easy and amazing way to introduce new members to our community.  CLICK HERE to give a gift membership.


Best wishes,
Mohamed Noor, President
Society for the Study of Evolution


 

14 January, 2014

Dear SSE Colleagues:

Happy New Year to all, and a special welcome to our new members!  I have just recently taken over the position as SSE President and am looking forward to working with the SSE Council at our upcoming January meeting.  We are anticipating a busy and exciting year ahead.  Congratulations to all the new 2014 officers!  To see a listing of SSE officers and Council members for 2014,  CLICK HERE.

Your SSE membership has not yet been renewed for 2014.  Please take a moment to do so, before you drop off of our mailing list.  RENEW HERE!

EVOLUTION Journal News
Just a reminder that we have made it easy for you to find articles from back issues of Evolution from the  SSE website.  After you’ve logged on as a member, you can get any issue from 2000 onward via the link to the Wiley page, and you can get older volumes by following the JSTOR link.

SSE Awards Accepting Nominations/Submissions
As in previous years, there will be various awards and prizes, including the W. D. Hamilton Award for Outstanding Student Presentation at the 2014 meeting, the Rosemary Grant Student Research Awards for students in the first two years of their Ph.D. programs, and the R. A. Fisher Prize for an outstanding Ph.D. dissertation paper published in Evolution during 2013.  You can find out more about these and other awards, including application details and deadlines, under the AWARDS tab at the  SSE website.  A number of awards have deadlines in January and February, so now is the time to begin thinking about nominations and working on submissions.
Fisher Prize - January 31
Dobzhansky Prize - February 15
Rosemary Grant Research Award - April 1

SSE International Committee Award Opportunities
The SSE-IC mission is to foster international relationships between evolution societies and its members with particular focus on students and early-career scientists. The committee sponsors annually a series of activities/awards to reach this goal.  Check out each of the following three to see if these opportunities might be right for you.
1. International Travel Stipends (IT- Awards)
2. Co-sponsorship of symposia organized by non-US based evolution societies
3. Evolution International Events (EIE) awards
The International Travel Stipend is managed directly by the SSE-IC committee. For the other two award types, the SSE-IC committee will present the best proposals to the SSE council, which will decide on the winner for that year. The equivalent of 10,000 euros will be devoted to the International Travel stipends. The rest of the available funding will be either given to either a single proposal from one category or divided amongst the best proposals in either of the two categories.

Call for Proposals for SSE Outreach Awards
January 25th is the deadline to apply for funds for a project/activity that supports and promotes the understanding of evolutionary biology.  Read more about these awards HERE.

Give An SSE Gift Membership
To assist in the continued growth of the Society, we encourage you to recruit new student members from your labs and classrooms.  Did you know that you can give a student a NEW membership for only $10?  Look at the students around you and give a gift membership or two this year!  We want to grow our student population, so please consider this special invitation.  We also invite you to take advantage of the opportunity of giving gift associate memberships to colleagues from developing countries, also at the low rate of $10.  This is an easy and amazing way to introduce new members to our community.  CLICK HERE to give a gift membership.


EVOLUTION 2014 Meeting News
Save the date!  This year SSE will meet in Raleigh, North Carolina on June 20-24.  This is the premier opportunity to share scientific research on evolution. There will be symposia, contributed papers, and poster sessions, and we’re expecting around 1,500 participants. We plan to open the registration and abstract submission sites by the end of this month.    NESCent, the National Evolutionary Science Center, is organizing the Evolution 2014 meeting.

Make your plans now to join us in Raleigh next June!

Best wishes,
Mohamed Noor, President
Society for the Study of Evolution
SSE Business Office
PO Box 299  |  St. Louis Missouri, 63166
314-577-9566
www.evolutionsociety.org


View full page

Text: Graduate Student Advisory Committee. Headshots of Susu Cong, Jill Syrotchen, Robert Driver, María Tocora, Shirley Zhang, and Rujuta Vaidya. SSE logo.

Welcome New GSAC Leaders!

The Graduate Student Advisory Committee (GSAC) represents student and postdoc interests to Council and facilitates interaction among students and postdocs and between students, postdocs, and mentors. We are pleased to welcome our new leaders for 2024: 

María Tocora, PhD candidate, University of Toronto 
Shirley Zhang, PhD candidate, Cornell University
Rujuta Vaidya, PhD student, Louisiana State University

Thank you also to our returning GSAC leaders: Susu Cong (Chair, 2024), Robert Driver, and Jill Love. GSAC would also like to thank everyone who applied, making it a record year for interest in this committee!

About Student Membership

Students enjoy a reduced rate for SSE membership. Join today!

Follow us on Twitter! @SSEgrad

Visit the Diverse Careers Committee website for useful information from members of the Society for the Study of Evolution and related societies regarding career paths for MS students and PhD students getting their degrees in the broader field of evolutionary biology.

 

About the Graduate Student Advisory Committee

The SSE Graduate Student Advisory Committee (GSAC) represents student and postdoc interests to the SSE Council and facilitates interaction among students and postdocs and between students, postdocs, and mentors. Our goal is to become a source of information for students to use both during their graduate school career and as they make career transitions.

The primary role of all GSAC members is to communicate with the SSE's graduate student and postdoc membership and liaise with the SSE Council on their behalf. One GSAC member per cohort will be chosen to attend Council meetings. GSAC organizes multiple networking and professional development events for the summer Evolution meeting. Secondary roles include maintaining social media accounts to facilitate networking among SSE student members, assisting in the review of Lewontin GREG Award applications, and assisting with initiatives led by other SSE committees. Other roles are continuing to be established, and ideas are welcome! Students will serve either a 2 or 3 year term and generally spend 5-10 hours per month on GSAC activities. Please see the GSAC structural document in the Officers Handbook for more details about requirements and current roles.





Current SSE GSAC Council Members

 

Haosu (Susu) Cong
Member 2023-2025, Chair 2024
I am a PhD candidate in Michigan State University, where I study the evolution of sexual dimorphic mating signals in Drosophila species.

Robert Driver
Member 2022-2024, Chair 2023
I am a postdoc at Duke University studying bird olfactory receptors.

Jill Love
Member 2023-2024
I am a PhD candidate in the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology department at Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana. I use the Mimulus system to investigate phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation with a combination of quantitative genetic, genomic, and field experiments.



Student Awards

Graduate Research Excellence Grants
W.D. Hamilton Award
T.H. Huxley Award
SSE Presidents' Award for Outstanding Dissertation Paper in Evolution
Outreach grants
Graduate/Postdoc Travel Awards
International Committee Travel Awards



Past GSAC Members

Henry Arenas-Castro
Member 2021-2023, Chair 2022
Léonard Dekens
Member 2022-2023
Cathy Hernandez
Member 2022-2023
Elizabeth Carlen 
Member 2020-2022, Chair 2021

Emily Laub
Member 2021-2022

Sally Chang
Member 2019-2021, Chair 2020

Catherine Chen
Member 2020-2021

Erin Giglio
Member 2020-2021

Liz Lange
Member 2018-2020, Chair 2019

Andis Arietta
Member 2019-2020
a

Jodie Wiggins
Member 2017-2019, Chair 2018

José Cerca
Member 2018-2019 

Melissa Plakke
Member 2018-2019

a

Megan Kobiela
Member 2016-2018, Chair 2017

a

Daren Card
Member 2017-2018

a

Cathy Rushworth
Member 2013-2017, Chair 2013-2016

a

Melissa E. Kemp
Member 2016-2017

a

Aide Macias Muñoz
Member 2016-2017

a

Karl Grieshop
Member 2014-2016


View full page
 SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF EVOLUTION

 September 8, 2015

Dear SSE Colleagues:

Those of us who were able to attend our annual Tri-Society meeting in Brazil enjoyed a beautiful venue, great hospitality and an excellent scholarly meeting.  We also had many opportunities to meet and share experiences with our colleagues in the Sociedade Brasileira de Genética.  As we had hoped, new collaborations were planned and links were forged for greater exchanges between evolutionary biologists in North and South America. 
 
Organizing this meeting presented many new challenges for all involved on both continents, and we were delighted to see it all come together so well.  Without doubt, the greatest burden fell on the shoulders ofProfessor Dr. Reinaldo Brito of the Department of Genetics and Evolution, Federal University of São Carlos.  To Reinaldo must also go the lion’s share of the credit for the success of both the social and scholarly aspects of the meeting.  Thank you Reinaldo and thanks also to all of your team from everyone in the SSE!   This was an epic job and a landmark meeting. 
 
If you could not attend the meeting in Brazil, you can still get a taste of what the meeting was like through links on the SSE home page.  Thanks to many student volunteers, videosof 150 of the talks are now online and can be accessed through the SSE web page.  For those of you who may be interested in the history and mission of the Society and its flagship journal, slides from the 2015 SSE Presidential address, On the Shoulders of Giants. Seven Decades of the SSE and Evolution, are also posted.
 
Mark your calendars now and plan to join us for EVOLUTION 2016June 17-21, 2016 in Austin, Texas.  Information about this meeting, as well and past and future meetings has now been consolidated on our new Tri-Society Meeting web page


CONGRATULATIONS TO OUR 2015 AWARD WINNERS:
 
The Stephen Jay Gould Prize is awarded annually by the SSE to recognize individuals whose sustained and exemplary efforts have advanced public understanding of evolutionary science and its importance in biology, education, and everyday life in the spirit of Stephen Jay Gould. This year's award winner is Professor Francisco J Ayala, University of CaliforniaIrvine and the title of his talk was "Copernicus and Darwin: Two Revolutions."  The video of his talk will soon be available on the Society web page.
 
The R. A. Fisher Prize is awarded annually by the Society for the Study of Evolution for an outstanding Ph.D. dissertation paper published in the journalEvolution during a given calendar year. This year’s Fisher Prize is awarded to Dr. Alison E. Wright, for her paper: Alison E. Wright, Peter W. Harrison, Stephen H. Montgomery, Marie A. Pointer and Judith E. Mank. 2014. Independent stratum formation on the avian sex chromosomes reveals inter-chromosomal gene conversion and predominance of purifying selection on the W chromosome.Evolution. 68(11):3281–3295.
 
The Theodosius Dobzhansky Prize is awarded annually by SSE to recognize the accomplishments and future promise of an outstanding young evolutionary biologist.  The winner of the 2015 award is Dr. Katie Wagner.  Dr. Wagner received her PhD from Cornell in 2011, and is currently a postdoctoral research associate at the Swiss Federal institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, where she is collaborating with Dr. Ole Seehausen; she is also a current Instructor at the University of Bern, Switzerland. She will begin as an assistant professor at the University of Wyoming in the Fall of 2015. The committee was impressed by the breadth of her work, which has illuminated the HOW and WHY of adaptive radiation and given us a greater understanding of evolutionary processes that generate diversity.
 
The W.D. Hamilton Award for Outstanding Student Presentation has been awarded to two students who presented outstanding talks at the annual meeting.  The co-award winners were Maude Baldwin, Harvard University "The evolution of sweet taste perception in hummingbirds"  and Sarah Fitzpatrick, Colorado State University "Gene flow from an adaptively divergent source causes genetic rescue, not outbreeding depression, in two wild populations of Trinidadian guppies."  Congratulations to both of them!
 

SOCIETY NEWS AND UPDATES
  • Recently, the SSE formed a Graduate Student Advisory Council (GSAC) to provide a liaison between the governing SSE Council and SSE members who are presently students or postdoctoral fellows. The GSAC distributes bulletins to our student and postdoctoral members and also solicits feedback and organizes events such as the student-mentor mixer at our annual meeting. Cathy Rushworth (postdoc, UC Berkeley) and Karl Grieshop (PhD student, Uppsala University) are continuing on the GSAC this year, and we welcome new GSAC members Melissa Kemp (postdoc, Harvard University), Megan Kobiela (PhD student, University of Minnesota), and Aide Macias Munoz (PhD student, UC Irvine).  For more information about GSAC, including how you might become involved, contact this year's GSAC representative to Council, Cathy Rushworth (crushworth@berkeley.edu) or the SSE Secretary, Cynthia Weinig (cweinig@uwyo.edu).
     
  • Nominations for the Fisher Prize for 2016 (for papers published in Evolution in 2015) are open until January 31, 2016.  Authors of eligible manuscripts may initiate a nomination upon acceptance of their manuscripts for publication. Nominations must include the final version of the manuscript, dissertation completion date, and a supporting letter from the Ph.D. supervisor or other individual familiar with the work.  For more information see www.evolutionsociety.org under the “Awards” tab.
  • Applications for Rosemary Grant Student Research Awards open on January 1, 2016 and must be submitted by April 1, 2016.  Information is available atwww.evolutionsociety.org under the “Awards” tab.
  • The SSW International Committee provides funds to support international travel and to support international collaborations among evolution-oriented scientific Societies.  If you are interested in applying, further information can be found on the SSE web page (www.evolutionsociety.org) under the Awards tab.
 
AUGUST ISSUE OF EVOLUTION
Have you seen the latest issue of Evolution?  Browse the current issue and all past issues using your Society log in at: www.evolutionsociety.org
 
SSE Members can access Evolution from wherever you like from your iPad!  The Evolution app has been recently updated.  You no longer need a special access code from the Society to access this app.  Just use your Society log in! This is an exciting new development and we hope it will make for a more portable and friendly online version of the journal to stay current.  Download the FREE Evolution app from iTunes today. 

Thank you for supporting the SSE.
 
With best regards,
Daphne Fairbairn, President
Society for the Study of Evolution
 
SSE Business Office
4475 Castleman Avenue  |  St. Louis Missouri, 63110-3201
314-577-9566
www.evolutionsociety.org

March 23

Dear SSE Colleagues:

Registration is open for EVOLUTION 2015 in Brazil!  The meeting will be held at the Casa Grande Hotel Resort and Spa, a five-star seafront resort in Guarujá, Brazil. There are several other smaller hotels and B&Bs within walking distance of the meeting venue.  Get your passports and VISAs ready and make your travel arrangements for June 26-30, 2015 .  The early bird registration and presentation submission deadline is April 15.  Check out the EVOLUTION 2015 meeting site and plan to join us in Brazil this summer!


SSE Awards Accepting Nominations/Submissions
The 90 lucky winners of the Student Travel Awards for the Brazil meeting were chosen and have been notified.  You can view the winners as well as those on a stand-by list on the SSE web site

Applications for SSE International Travel Stipends are due on March 31.  Note that these are given by the SSE International Committee for attendance at the Brazil meeting or at the ESEB meeting in Lausanne in August.  They are independent of the SSE Student Travel Stipend for Evolution 2015 and are open to SSE members at various stages of their scientific careers, including, students, postdoctoral fellows and lecturers.  Students who have received an SSE Travel Stipend in the past five years are not eligible.  Additional restrictions apply, so check the description of the awards and consider applying.

The Rosemary Grant Graduate Student Research Award competition provides between $1500 - $2500 support to students.   These awards are to assist students in the early stages of their Ph.D (first two years) programs by enabling them to collect preliminary data (to pursue additional sources of support) or to enhance the scope of their research beyond current funding limits (e.g. by visiting additional field sites, or working at other labs). Students will need to demonstrate how the proposed work is outside any related funding for the project already held by the student or advisor. To be considered for this year's award, application materials must be received electronically by APRIL 1, 2015.

Thank you for your continued work and support of our mission.

Best wishes,
Daphne Fairbairn, President
Society for the Study of Evolution









SSE Business Office
PO Box 299  |  St. Louis Missouri, 63166
314-577-9566
www.evolutionsociety.org

 



 

January 23, 2015

Dear SSE Colleagues:

Welcome to another exciting year as part of this community.

Congratulations and thanks to our newly elected Council members!
President-elect Kim Hughes (Florida State University)
Secretary Cynthia Weinig (University of Wyoming)
Councilor Andrea Case (Kent State University)
Councilor Kristi Montooth (University of Nebraska)

Additionally, special thanks to Maria Servedio (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), who will serve as a new Handling Editor for Evolution.  You can always find out current list of officers, council and committee members HERE.

 

The 2015 SSE Annual Meeting
Get your passports and VISAs readyfor the next SSE annual meeting which will take place June 26-30, 2015 at theCasa Grande Resort in Guarujá, Brazil.  We anticipate that registration and abstract submission will open in early February.  Some information is already being posted at theEVOLUTION 2015 meeting site. More information about meeting registration and abstract submission will be coming to your inbox very soon!

SSE Awards Accepting Nominations/Submissions
There are a number of deadlines upcoming for SSE Awards.
Fisher Prize - January 31
Dobzhansky Prize - February 15
Rosemary Grant Research Award - April 1

Travel Stipends for Students Going to Brazil
Consider applying for or encouraging one of your students to apply for the Hamilton Award this year.  The W.D. Hamilton Award for Outstanding Student Presentation will be given to a student who has presented an outstanding talk at the annual meeting. Finalists will present their papers during a day-long symposium of Hamilton award candidate talks. This year, finalists will receive a registration waiver and a $500 travel stipend from the SSE.   Apply by  February 20th to be considered.  Learn more and find the link to apply HERE.

In addition to the Hamilton Award, SSE anticipates making approximately 90 Student Travel awards that will include a $500 stipend and free registration to facilitate student attendance at the 2015 annual meetings in Guaruja, Brazil. Awards will be made on a lottery basis from eligible applications completed by the deadline. Eligibility - open to graduate and undergraduate students enrolled in a degree-granting program at the time of registration, students must be presenting original work at the Evolution 2015 meeting and must be a current member of SSE.  A short application form must be filled out on the SSE web site.  You must log in as a member to view the application form.  Deadline is February 12.

Thank you for your continued work and support of our mission.

 

Best wishes,
Daphne Fairbairn, President
Society for the Study of Evolution









SSE Business Office
PO Box 299  |  St. Louis Missouri, 63166
314-577-9566
www.evolutionsociety.org


View full page

Congratulations to the recipients of the Student Travel Stipend to attend the Evolution 2015 meeting in Brazil. If you are on the recipients list and unable to attend the meeting, please let us know immediately when you know this,  as we will move up the next person on the waiting list.

There are two steps you must take in order to receive the travel stipend.

1) You must complete the online "Evolution 2015 Travel Stipend Recipient Information" form by 9am on Wednesday, April 15th.  This form merely asks for your mailing address and the name as it should appear on your check.

2) Participants must email their flight confirmation receipt to Wanda at WLovan@botany.org by noon MDT on Wednesday, April 15th.

Travel checks will be mailed on April 15th.

 

CLICK HERE FOR THE STAND-BY LIST

 

AWARD RECIPIENTS

First Name Last Name Institution Advisor
Stepfanie Aguillon Cornell University Richard G. Harrison & Irby J. Lovette
Brett Aiello University of Chicago Dr. Melina Hale
Emily Behrman University of Pennsylvania Paul Schmidt
Jennifer Benetti-Longhini Middle Tennessee State University Dr. Andrew Brower
Moises Bernal  University of Texas Marine Science Institute  Benjamin Walther 
Noelle Bittner University of California Berkeley Michael W. Nachman
Lisa Bono University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Christina Burch
Clare Brown Louisiana State University Frederick Sheldon
Joanna Bundus University of Toronto Asher Cutter
Alita Burmeister Michigan State University Richard Lenski
Ryan Calhoun University of Western Ontario Amanda Moehring
Elizabeth Carlen California Academy of Sciences John P Dumbacher
Jason Cassara Florida State University David Houle
Logan Cole Indiana University Jeffrey D. Palmer
Eve Culbreth The Florida State University Dr. Joseph Travis
Mitchel Daniel University of Toronto Dr. Helen Rodd
Mitra Eghbal University of Pennsylvania Paul Sniegowski
Lauren Esposito CUNY Queens College Dr. John J. Dennehy
Benjamin Freeman Cornell University John Fitzpatrick
Natalia Garcia Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia" Pablo L. Tubaro
XINGYUE GE University of Arizona Mike Barker
Noah Gettle University of Minnesota Michael Travisano
Alannie Grant University of Pittsburgh Susan Kalisz
Robin Green Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/ University of Washington Wenying Shou
Alex Hall The University of Texas at Arlington Matthew Fujita
Alice Harada Scripps Institution of Oceanography (University of California, San Diego) Ronald Burton
Brock Harpur York University Amro Zayed
Lily Hughes George Washington University Guillermo Orti
Annie Jeong Duke University John Willis
Rachelle Kanippayoor University of Western Ontario Dr Amanda Moehring
Jonathan Kennedy University of Copenhagen Carsten Rahbek
Berrit Kiehl Uppsala University, EBC, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Simone Immler
Abigail Kimmitt Indiana University, Bloomington Ellen Ketterson
Katie LaBarbera University of California - Berkeley Eileen Lacey
Pablo Lavinia Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia" Dario Lijtmaer
Nicholas Levis University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill David Pfennig
Christopher Luszczek York University Dr. Roberto Quinlan
Maria Marchan-Rivadeneira Texas Tech University-UMICH Dr. Robert J. Baker
Gina Marchini Portland State University Mitchell Cruzan
Kyle McCulloch University of California, Irvine Adriana Briscoe
Matthew McElroy University of Washington Adam Leache
Iliana Medina Australian National University Dr. Naomi Langmore
Elizabeth Miller University of Arizona John Wiens
Grey Monroe Colorado State University John McKay
Mauricio Montano-Rendon University of Sheffield Roger K. Butlin
Pamela Morales Universidad de Chile Marco Méndez
Erin Morrison University of Arizona Alexander Badyaev
Trieste Musial Emory University Leslie Real
David Ocampo Universidad de los Andes Carlos Daniel Cadena
Stephen Ordway University of Missouri - St. Louis Sonya Bahar
Isaac Overcast City University of New York Mike Hickerson
Kayla Peck UNC Chapel Hill Christina Burch
Sydney Pickett Case Western Reserve University Dr. Gavin Svenson
Melissa Plakke University of Pittsburgh Dr. Nathan Morehouse
Paulo Pulgarin Universidad de Los Andes Carlos Daniel Cadena
Joanna Rifkin Duke University Mark D. Rausher
Julio Rivera University fo Hawaii Marguerite Butler
Kelly Rooker University of Tennessee, Knoxville Dr. Sergey Gavrilets
Vanessa Rossetto Marcelino University of Melbourne Heroen Verbruggen
Tomoko Sakishima University of Hawaii at Hilo Dr. Elizabeth Stacy
Shayla Salzman Harvard University Naomi Pierce
Brian Sanderson University of Virginia Edmund D. Brodie III
Rena Schweizer UCLA Robert K Wayne
Peter Scott University of Alabama Dr. Leslie Rissler
Jeff Shi University of Michigan Dan Rabosky
Allison Shultz Harvard University Scott Edwards
Joel Smith University of Chicago Dick Hudson & John Novembre
Peter Smits University of Chicago Michael Foote
Taichi Suzuki University California Berkeley Michael Nachman
Sumaetee Tangwancharoen Scripps Institution of Oceanography,UCSD Ron Burton
Andrew Thompson The George Washington University Guillermo Orti
Ken Thompson University of Toronto Mississauga - Department of Biology Marc TJ Johnson
James Titus-McQuillan University of Texas at Arlington Dr. Matthew Fujita
Gabriela Toledo University of Virginia Edmund D Brodie III
Natalia Trujillo Arias Museo Argentino de Ciencas Naturales Gustavo Sebastian Cabanne
Mitch Tucker University of Missouri Dr. H. Carl Gerhardt
Judit Ungvari-Martin University of Florida Scott Robinson
Brandon Waltz University of Louisiana at Lafayette James Albert
Emily Warschefsky Florida International University Dr. Eric von Wettberg
Ryan Weaver Auburn University Geoffrey Hill
Jessica Weber University of New Mexico Joseph Cook
Emily Weigel Michigan State University Jenny Boughman
Emily Weiss Oregon State University Dee Denver
Alexander White University of Chicago  Trevor Price
Benjamin Winger University of Chicago John Bates
Michael Wiser Michigan State University Richard Lenski
Corlett Wood University of Virginia Edmund Brodie III
Perry Wood Brigham Young University Jack W. Sites Jr.
Rosana Zenil-Ferguson University of Florida Jose Miguel Ponciano
Daniel Zydek University of South Florida Marc Lajeunesse

 

 

The students on the list below are on a waiting list. If any of the travel award winners declines their award, we will be contacting students from the list below in the order they were selected in the lottery. 

STAND-BY LIST

First Name Last Name Institution Advisor
Clarissa Fontes University of California Berkeley Todd Dawson
Matthew Galliart Kansas State University Loretta Johnson
Eva Salas UC Santa Cruz Luiz Rocha
Arthur Porto Washington University in St Louis Dr James M. Cheverud
Susan Kennedy University of California - Berkeley Rosemary Gillespie
Sarah Sander University of Georgia David Hall
Margarita Baquero Mississippi State University Dr. Brian A. Counterman
Kayce Bell University of New Mexico Joseph Cook
Karan Singh IISER Mohali Dr.N.G.Prasad
Dawn King University of Missouri at St. Louis Sonya Bahar
Pauline Pantoja University of Stirling  Mario Vallejo-Marin
Lauren Gonzalez University of Florida Pamela Soltis
Susan Finkbeiner University of California, Irvine Adriana Briscoe
Adrian Garcia-Rodriguez Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil Dr. Gabriel Costa
Kristin Winchell University of Massachusetts Boston Liam Revell
Taylor Edwards University of Arizona Dr. Melanie Culver
Jessa Justen University of Wisconsin- Madison Dr. Sean B. Carroll
Noah  Burg CUNY/AMNH Mark E. Hauber
Paul Chafe York University Dr. joel Shore
Jessica Valdes The University of Texas at Austin Julia Clarke
Shaina Lu Swarthmore College Vince Formica
Amber Paasch American Museum of Natural History Eunsoo Kim
Willian Silva Uppsala University Simone Immler
Sean Edgerton California Academy of Sciences Shannon N. Bennett
Renan Rodrigues Rocha Universidade Federal de Viçosa - Campus Rio Paranaíba Rubens Pazza
Gerardo Serrato-Capuchina University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill David Pfennig
Aide Macias Munoz University of California, Irvine Adriana Briscoe
Madeline Keleher Washington University in St. Louis Jim Cheverud and Jennifer Duncan
Adriana Salcedo Univeristy of Toronto Stephen Wright, John Stinchcombe
Gideon Bradburd UC Davis Graham Coop
Eric Garcia University of California Santa Cruz Dr. Giacomo Bernardi
Patrick Monnahan University of Kansas Dr. John Kelly

View full page

2015 Rosemary Grant Applications

To review the "Call for Applications" - click here

  1. Adams
    Application

  2. Aguillon
    Application

  3. Akcali
    Application

  4. Allevato
    Application

  5. Anderson
    Application

  6. Arantes
    Application

  7. Benning
    Application

  8. Bergen
    Application

  9. Berv
    Application

  10. Beston
    Application

  11. Biswas
    Application

  12. Bosque
    Application

  13. Braasch
    Application

  14. Callaway
    Application

  15. Carey
    Application

  16. Carley
    Application

  17. Carlo
    Application

  18. Carrillo-Baltodano
    Application

  19. Castillo
    Application

  20. Caves
    Application

  21. Charboneau
    Application

  22. Chaturvedi
    Application

  23. Colella
    Application

  24. Craig
    Application

  25. D'Aguillo
    Application

  26. De Rosa
    Application

  27. Debban
    Application

  28. de la Serna Buzon
    Application

  29. Del Serra
    Application

  30. Echeverri
    Application

  31. Eisen
    Application

  32. Elshahat
    Application

  33. Enbody
    Application

  34. Escobar Camacho
    Application

  35. Evans-A
    Application

  36. Evans-K
    Application

  37. Figgener
    Application

  38. Forrester
    Application

  39. Funk
    Application

  40. Galen
    Application

  41. Garcia
    Application

  42. Gettle
    Application

  43. Ge
    Application

  44. Gilbert
    Application

  45. Goldberg
    Application

  46. Gonzalez
    Application

  47. Grayson
    Application

  48. Griffin
    Application

  49. Hager
    Application

  50. Hague
    Application

  51. Hantak
    Application

  52. Havens
    Application

  53. Herman
    Application

  54. Hernandez
    Application

  55. Howard
    Application

  56. Hutter
    Application

  57. Hyseni
    Application

  58. Johnson
    Application

  59. Jones
    Application

  60. Jorgensen
    Application

  61. Kim
    Application

  62. Klicka
    Application

  63. Kollar
    Application

  64. Korunes
    Application

  65. Lange
    Application

  66. Larsen
    Application

  67. Larson
    Application

  68. Law
    Application

  69. Lee
    Application

  70. Lehto
    Application

  71. Levis
    Application

  72. Liao
    Application

  73. Liotta
    Application

  74. Ludwig
    Application

  75. Marquez
    Application

  76. Marshall
    Application

  77. McElroy
    Application

  78. McQuillan
    Application

  79. Mittan
    Application

  80. Monroe
    Application

  81. Moore
    Application

  82. Moran
    Application

  83. Nadeau
    Application

  84. Neal
    Application

  85. Niner
    Application

  86. Paine
    Application

  87. Penalba
    Application

  88. PETERSON
    Application

  89. Pierson
    Application

  90. Pinson
    Application

  91. Plakke
    Application

  92. Porter
    Application

  93. Potticary
    Application

  94. Rea
    Application

  95. Recart
    Application

  96. Seitz
    Application

  97. Shahandeh
    Application

  98. Sianta
    Application

  99. Siegund
    Application

  100. Silva
    Application

  101. Sligar
    Application

  102. Somjee
    Application

  103. Southcott
    Application

  104. Stern
    Application

  105. Stubbs
    Application

  106. Stuckert
    Application

  107. Sur
    Application

  108. Tyrell
    Application

  109. Valvo
    Application

  110. Vander Burg
    Application

  111. Villalta
    Application

  112. Weaver
    Application

  113. Weller
    Application

  114. Wishingrad
    Application

  115. Wolf
    Application

  116. Zonana
    Application

  117. Ranathunge
    Application

  118. Kilgour
    Application


View full page

2016 Rosemary Grant Applications

To review the "Call for Applications" - click here

  1. Abraham-R
    Application

  2. Aguillon-S
    Application

  3. Allen-K
    Application

  4. Apkenas-V
    Application

  5. Ausprey-I
    Application

  6. Austin-Z
    Application

  7. Baillie-C
    Application

  8. Ballinger-M
    Application

  9. Barosh_T
    Application

  10. Barts_N
    Application

  11. Booker-W
    Application

  12. Bouzid-N
    Application

  13. Brannoch-S
    Application

  14. Brock-K
    Application

  15. Burgess-S
    Application

  16. Burroughs-R
    Application

  17. user_T
    Application

  18. Buzon-S
    Application

  19. Calabrese-G
    Application

  20. Carlen-E
    Application

  21. Carley-L
    Application

  22. Carvalho-A
    Application

  23. Castillo-A
    Application

  24. Chaturvedi-S
    Application

  25. Cisternas-A
    Application

  26. Cohen-D
    Application

  27. Colella_J
    Application

  28. Combs-M
    Application

  29. Corbin-A
    Application

  30. daCostaArantes-I
    Application

  31. Davis-J
    Application

  32. DelRio-G
    Application

  33. DelSerra-S
    Application

  34. Dhawanjewar-A
    Application

  35. Doumas-T
    Application

  36. Edelman-N
    Application

  37. Emberts-Z
    Application

  38. Evans.A.
    Application

  39. Freedman-M
    Application

  40. Gao-K
    Application

  41. Gibson-J
    Application

  42. Goldberg-J
    Application

  43. Goldberg-JK
    Application

  44. Gonzalez-L
    Application

  45. Graham-N
    Application

  46. Greenway
    Application

  47. Griffiths-J
    Application

  48. Hager-E
    Application

  49. Hallas-J
    Application

  50. Henger
    Application

  51. HENRY_K
    Application

  52. Herman-J
    Application

  53. Hofmeister-N
    Application

  54. Holmes-I
    Application

  55. Holmes-K
    Application

  56. Howard-C
    Application

  57. Hulbert-J
    Application

  58. Huynh-A
    Application

  59. Jalinsky-J
    Application

  60. JONES-K
    Application

  61. Jorgensen-S
    Application

  62. Kedar_K
    Application

  63. Keeble
    Application

  64. Keegan-K
    Application

  65. Kelly-P
    Application

  66. Kenyon-H
    Application

  67. Kollar-L
    Application

  68. Krieg-C
    Application

  69. Levis-N
    Application

  70. Liao-I
    Application

  71. Linan-A
    Application

  72. Linck-E
    Application

  73. Lu_Yang
    Application

  74. Lynn-A
    Application

  75. Mabry-M
    Application

  76. Maccracken-S
    Application

  77. MacGuigan-D
    Application

  78. Marcondes-R
    Application

  79. McQueary-H
    Application

  80. Medina-N
    Application

  81. Menon-M
    Application

  82. Million-K
    Application

  83. Mittan-C
    Application

  84. Moncrieff-A
    Application

  85. Moore_M
    Application

  86. Morgan-V
    Application

  87. Mount-G
    Application




  88. MULDER-K
    Application

  89. Newell-F
    Application

  90. OBRIEN-R
    Application

  91. Olson-K
    Application

  92. ORTIZ
    Application

  93. Osborne-TR
    Application

  94. Pasquesi-GIM
    Application

  95. Paul-R
    Application

  96. PETERSON-K
    Application

  97. Pinson-J
    Application

  98. Popovic-I
    Application

  99. Porter-C
    Application

  100. Redondo-S
    Application

  101. Reilly-P
    Application

  102. Ritz-K
    Application

  103. Rivera
    Application

  104. Rockenbach-K
    Application

  105. Rodrigues-H
    Application

  106. Rodriguez-Z
    Application

  107. Salter-J
    Application

  108. Scavo-K
    Application

  109. Schaal-S
    Application

  110. Scheckel-K
    Application

  111. Scholl-J
    Application

  112. Schubert-S
    Application

  113. Schwery
    Application

  114. Shakya-S
    Application

  115. Shaver-A
    Application

  116. Singh-R
    Application

  117. Smith-M
    Application

  118. Smoot-S
    Application

  119. Solonenko-S
    Application

  120. Somjee-U
    Application

  121. Stanchak-K
    Application

  122. Stehle-C
    Application

  123. Stockmaier-S
    Application

  124. SUN-S
    Application

  125. Taverner_A
    Application

  126. Taylor-K
    Application

  127. Tedrow-R
    Application

  128. Teitel-Z
    Application

  129. Tovar-R
    Application

  130. Turbek-S
    Application

  131. VersterK
    Application

  132. Vyas-D
    Application

  133. Walsh-J
    Application

  134. Wenzell-K
    Application

  135. Wheeler-G
    Application

  136. White-P
    Application

  137. Whyte-B
    Application

  138. Wice-E
    Application

  139. Willink-B
    Application

  140. Wisniewska-M
    Application

  141. YOON-S
    Application

  142. Yuan-M
    Application

  143. Zhao-S
    Application

  144. Ziadie-M
    Application

  145. Hyseni-C
    Application


View full page

The following awards provide funding for travel to the annual Evolution meetingTravel award recipients are not eligible to volunteer at the conference.

SSE Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution Program
SSE Graduate Student and Postdoc Registration Waiver
SSE International Travel Stipends
SSE Global Membership Assistance Program - Meeting Participation
SSE Caregiver Awards 

SSE Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution Program

This travel award brings talented and diverse undergraduates to the meeting to present a poster, receive mentoring and participate in a career-oriented 'Undergraduate Futures in Evolutionary Biology' panel and discussion. The program covers travel, registration, and room and board. For more information and to submit an application visit the UDE webpage.

 

SSE Graduate Student and Postdoc Registration Waiver

This program is for graduate students and postdoctoral fellows interested in attending and presenting at the in-person annual Evolution meeting, especially those who need additional financial support in order to attend. This program replaces the SSE Graduate Student and Postdoc Travel Supplement. 

Requirements:

  • Applicants must be a member of SSE
  • Applicants must present a talk or poster at the in-person portion of the annual Evolution meeting
  • Applicants must be enrolled in a graduate program OR be fewer than 6 years post-PhD without a permanent position
  • Applicants must not have received the SSE Graduate Student and Postdoc travel supplement in 2023

Applicants requiring additional funding to attend the Evolution meeting will be randomly selected. If surplus funding is available, applicants not requiring additional funding will be randomly selected. Awards should be split between graduate students and post docs in the same approximate ratio of applications (i.e. if 20% of applicants are postdocs, 20% of awards go to postdocs).

To apply, please complete this form.

Deadline: March 15, 2024 

Recipients will receive a code for free registration for the in-person portion of the Evolution meeting at the early-bird society member student or postdoc rate. In 2024, the in-person portion of the Evolution meeting will be held in Montreal, Canada from July 26-30. Meeting registration is already open. Recipients will be selected and notified by March 30 and should be sure to register ahead of the early discount deadline.



SSE International Travel Stipends

These stipends are for students and young scientists to attend the in-person portion of the 2024 Evolution meeting in Montreal, QC, Canada on July 26-30, 2024. This year, the meeting is held jointly with the European Society for Evolutionary Biology. In years where ESEB meets separately from SSE, ASN, and SSB, the award may be used for either meeting. 

Eligibility

  • You must be a member of SSE (for becoming a member of SSE, see https://payments.evolutionsociety.org/joinsse/).
  • Various career stages are eligible, including Masters and PhD students, postdocs, and lecturers. 
  • You must submit to present either a talk or a poster at the meeting. (This will be verified before the reimbursement, but no proof that a poster or talk is accepted is necessary at the application stage.)
  • You must not have received an SSE travel stipend in the last five years. 
  • Scientists working in a country with high GDP are NOT eligible (for the list of excluded countries see below). 

Members professionally based in the following countries are not eligible for the travel stipend: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxemburg, Malta, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States of America.

NOTE: If you are a graduate student or postdoctoral fellow from a low GDP country, you are eligible to apply for the International Travel Stipend AND the Graduate Student and Postdoc Registration Waiver, though no one will be granted more than one award, as the International Travel Stipend includes a registration waiver. 

To apply, please submit the following materials as a single PDF: 

  • The application, maximum 2 pages, containing
    • Name of the applicant;
    • Name of the conference applicant wishes to attend;
    • A brief explanation of how attendance to the meeting will further the attendant’s professional goals;
    • Brief CV
  • Budget (download template)
  • Letter of support from the applicant's advisor/mentor/senior colleague

The application, budget, and letter of support should be emailed to the SSE International Committee Chair at international [at] evolutionsociety.org. The letter of support should be sent by the letter writer.

Deadline: January 31, 2024

Recipients will receive a code for meeting registration. All other expenses will be reimbursed after the meeting following submission of receipts. Recipients will receive further instructions for reimbursement from the SSE Treasurer.
 

Global Membership Assistance - Meeting Participation

SSE is pleased to offer free registration for the virtual portion of the meeting to SSE members who reside in one of the 152 countries and territories eligible for the Global Membership Assistance program. Eligible members should request a discount code using the form on the Membership page. If you are not yet a member of SSE, please join before completing the form. Please apply as soon as possible if you plan to attend the meeting.
 

SSE Caregiver Awards

The SSE Caregiver Award is meant to assist members who have additional needs and responsibilities that can inhibit participation at the annual Evolution meeting. This award provides up to $500 to SSE members that need assistance in covering caregiver costs while attending the annual Evolution meeting (in person or virtually). A "caregiver" is broadly defined and includes people caring for children or dependent adults (including adult children with a disability or elderly relatives), and people in need of personal assistance; this award can be spent as the awardee wishes to facilitate attendance.

For example, this award can be used (but is not limited) to:

  • bring someone who is in your care to the Evolution meeting
  • bring someone who is helping to care for you to the Evolution meeting
  • cover the cost of dependent care while you attend virtually
  • cover the cost of dependent care at home while you travel
  • cover any extra accessibility costs associated with attending

Awardees can spend this money in whatever way will help alleviate the cost of caregiving. We anticipate up to 20 awards will be made available, depending on the number of applicants. Apply here.

Deadline: March 15, 2024


View full page

View full page
France Córdova
Director, National Science Foundation James Olds
Assistant Director, Directorate of Biological Sciences
National Science Foundation Dear Director Córdova and Assistant Director Olds, As representatives of the Society for the Study of Evolution, the American Society of Naturalists, and the Society of Systematic Biologists, we are writing to urge NSF to reinstate the Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant (DDIG) program in the Division of Environmental Biology and the Division of Integrative Organismal Systems. DDIGs are a strategic investment in the future of our fields, contributing to the development of independent research skills in the junior cohorts who will be the next innovators. DDIGs offer graduate students independence in their research, mentorship opportunities, and resources to network and disseminate their findings. Having their own financial resources permits students to prioritize their research goals and invest in directions they find most promising, directly supporting the development of scientific creativity and leadership for the future of the country. Students who have received DDIGs have had valuable training in grant writing, administering grant funding, crafting independent research programs, and mentoring. These are all essential skills that represent the essence of our goals for training students in our fields. There are few other avenues whereby students can obtain such valuable experience, and DDIGs offer unusually high return on the modest financial investment. Without the DDIG program, the junior members of our societies and in related fields will be denied valuable opportunities for their intellectual and professional development. The termination of the DDIG program will have long-lasting adverse consequences to the intellectual development of young scientists in ecology, evolution, and organismal biology. Representing the thousands of members in our respective societies, we offer to help find solutions to support the DDIG program and maintain a sound, fiscally responsible, and efficient program in support of student research. The DDIG program is a very important investment in the scientific future of the country. Sincerely, Sarah Otto
President, Society for the Study of Evolution Kathleen Donohue
President, The American Society of Naturalists Luke Harmon
President, Society for Systematic Biologists

View full page

The Public Policy Committee was formed in 2017, and advises the Council on issues of science and public policy. The Public Policy Committee monitors changes to policies and laws that impact evolution as a field, the support of scientific research, and/or the research of SSE members.

To bring issues of relevance to the attention of the committee, please contact the Public Policy Committee chair at policy [at] evolutionsociety.org.

Resources

United States

How to contact your Congress and House representatives:

  • Democracy.io: Enter your address, compose an email to your representatives, and Democracy.io will send it for you.
  • CallYourRep: Enter your address, and CallYourRep will give you the phone numbers of your representatives.
  • Resistbot: Text RESIST to 50409 or message @Resistbot on Facebook and it will find out who represents you in Congress and deliver your message to them.
  • GovTrack: Use GovTrack to research and track legislation in the United States Congress, including Members of Congress, bills and resolutions, voting records, and committee activity.

Policy Training for Scientists:

The American Institute for Biological Sciences (AIBS) Public Policy Office works at the interface of science and public policy. The office, staffed by science policy professionals, works to promote the use of biological sciences knowledge in our nation's public policy, and to develop and advance science policy that serves the needs of the scientific research and education communities, particularly the biological sciences.

  • The AIBS Congressional Visits Day: Meet with your members of Congress to help them understand the important role the federal government plays in supporting the biological sciences. Advocate for federal investments in biological sciences research supported by the National Science Foundation and other federal agencies.
  • The AIBS Congressional District Visits event enables scientists to meet with their federal or state elected officials in their home state--not in Washington, DC--and allows policymakers to learn first-hand about the science and research facilities in their district.
  • Sign up for AIBS public policy reports relating to biology: https://aibs.org/public-policy-reports/

The Fulbright Association organizes a policy day in DC to meet with members of the House and Senate to share their international experiences and urge support: https://fulbright.org/advocacy/fulbright-advocacy-day/

The American Association for the Advancement of Science offers the year-long AAAS Science Policy Fellowship, a great way to network and develop hands on experience: https://www.aaas.org/programs/science-technology-policy-fellowships/overview

The Ecological Society of America lists multiple science policy fellowships here: https://www.esa.org/policy/esa-policy-section/resources/

Canada

 

United Kingdom

Organizations engaged in science policy:

The Royal Society provides independent, timely and authoritative scientific advice to UK, European and international decision makers.

The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST) is Parliament's in-house source of independent, balanced and accessible analysis of public-policy issues related to science and technology.

The Royal Society of Biology engages in policy work and offers policy resources.

The Alliance for Useful Evidence is a network, hosted by the UK’s innovation charity Nesta, that champions the smarter use of evidence in social policy and practice.

 

Public Policy Training for Scientists:

British Ecological Society Policy Fellowship: With funding of up to £20,000, The BES Policy Fellowship will offer a mid-career ecologist (at least five years post-PhD) the chance to spend up to six months on a placement embedded within Defra or one of its agencies.

Have useful links from the country you live in? Please send them to us! communications@evolutionsociety.org


View full page

In 2018, SSE expanded its awards program for graduate students. This new program includes two tiers of awards: one for early PhD students and one for advanced PhD students. These awards are named for eminent evolutionary biologists also known for their strong mentorship and training of young evolutionary biologists: The GREG R.C. Lewontin Early Award, and the GREG Rosemary Grant Advanced Award.

Click here to view previous winners of the Rosemary Grant Award (2010-2018). Click here to view all recipients of the Graduate Research Excellence Grants.

Graduate Research Excellence Grant (GREG) – R. C. Lewontin Early Award

Graduate Research Excellence Grant (GREG) - Rosemary Grant Advanced Award

The GREG R. C. Lewontin Early Awards are to assist students in the early stages of their PhD programs by enabling them to collect preliminary data (to pursue additional sources of support) or to enhance the scope of their research beyond current funding limits (e.g. by visiting additional field sites, or working at other labs). Awards up to $2500. Students need to confirm that the proposed work is outside of funding already held by the student or advisor.




The GREG Rosemary Grant Advanced Awards are to assist students in the later stages of their PhD programs. Funds can be used to enhance the scope of dissertation research, such as to conduct additional experiments or field work. Awards up to $3500. Only advanced* PhD students whose defense date is more than 12 months from the proposal due date are eligible. Eligibility can be confirmed by the advisor or graduate director stating that the student fulfills these requirements. Students should confirm that the proposed work is outside the scope of other funding currently held by either the student or their advisor. 

*See full instructions for definition.

Learn More button

Learn More button

NOTE: Indirect costs may not be charged to any of our awards or grants.

Past Recipients

2023

R. C. Lewontin Early Award
 
Nathalie Alomar, Yale University. Advisor: Martha Muñoz
Neil Balchan, Oklahoma State University. Advisor: Guinevere Wogan
Tara Empson, University of Tennessee. Advisor: Elizabeth Derryberry
Anjali Gupta, University of Kansas. Advisor: Robert Unckless
Matthew Hack, University of Michigan. Advisor: Benjamin Winger
Azwad Iqbal, Cornell University. Advisor: Nina Therkildsen
Juliana Jiranek, University of Virginia. Advisor: Amanda Gibson
Gina Lucas, University of California Riverside. Advisor: Kieran Samuk
Jess Lund, University of Cambridge. Advisor: Claire Spottiswoode
Sage Madden, University of California Davis. Advisor: Gail Patricelli
Akshat Mall, University of Idaho. Advisor: Christopher Marx
Quinn McCallum, Louisiana State University. Advisor: Nicholas Mason
Jenna Palmisano, University of Central Florida. Advisor: Anna Savage
Faye Romero, University of Rochester. Advisor: Nancy Chen
Marissa Sandoval, University of California, Davis. Advisor: Santiago Ramirez
Fernando Torres, Johns Hopkins University. Advisor: Gabriel Bever
Wout van der Heide, Cornell University. Advisor: Kerry Shaw
Erica Vong, University of Ottawa. Advisor: Rajendhran Rajakumar
Claire Williams, University of Nevada, Reno. Advisor: Michael Logan
Maximiliano Zuluaga Forero, Cornell University. Advisor: Benjamin Sandkam
 

Rosemary Grant Advanced Award
 
Ethan Baldwin, University of Georgia. Advisor: Jim Leebens-Mack
Megan Barkdull, Cornell University. Advisor: Corrie Moreau
Joshua Dominguez, University of California San Diego. Advisor: Jonathan Shurin
Sylvia Durkin, University of California, Berkeley. Advisor: Michael Nachman
Alexis Heckley, McGill University. Advisor: Andrew Hendry
Megan Molinari, University of California, Santa Cruz. Advisor: Suzanne Alonzo
Laura Perez, Pennsylvania State University. Advisor: Mary Shenk
Tymofii Sokolskyi, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Advisor: David Baum
Shelby Tisinai, Washington State University. Advisor: Jeremiah Busch
Brittany Velikaneye, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth. Advisor: Genevieve Kozak
Amanda Vieira da Silva, Federal University of ABC. Advisor: Laura Leal

 

2022

R. C. Lewontin Early Award

Karla Berg, Portland State University. Advisor: Mitchell Cruzan
Anusha Bishop, University of California, Berkeley. Advisor: Ian Wang 
Austin Chipps, Louisiana State University. Advisor: Jake Esselstyn
Danae Diaz, Duke University. Advisor: Stephen Nowicki
Paula Fernandez Begne, University of Chicago. Advisor: Marcus Kronforst
Aidan Harrington, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. Advisor: David Moeller
Matheus Januario Lopes de Sousa, University of Michigan. Advisor: Daniel Rabosky
Josh Knecht, Binghamton University. Advisor: James Sobel
Danai Kontou, University of Cambridge. Advisor: Andrew Tanentzap
Sebastian Mortimer, Oregon State University. Advisor: Aaron Liston
Autumn Peterson, Georgia Institute of Technology. Advisor: William Ratcliff
Karissa Plum, University of Houston. Advisor: Rebecca Zufall
Verónica Reyes-Galindo, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Advisor: Alicia Mastretta-Yanes
Emma Rhodes, Auburn University. Advisor: Wendy Hood
Fabian C. Salgado Roa, The University of Melbourne. Advisor: Iliana Medina
Sergio Serrato-Arroyo, Arizona State University. Advisor: Silvie Huijben
Keana Tang, University of Kansas. Advisor: Kelly Matsunaga
Emily Terrill, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Advisor: Eva Fischer
Matthew Treaster, University of Georgia. Advisor: Michael White
Robin Waterman, Michigan State University. Advisor: Jeffrey Conner
 
 

Rosemary Grant Advanced Award
 
Grace Burgin, Harvard University. Advisor: Robin Hopkins
Haley Carter, Northwestern University. Advisor: Norm Wickett
Dylan DeBaun, American Museum of Natural History. Advisor: Frank Burbrink
Owen Dorsey, Texas A&M University. Advisor: Charles Criscione
Yasmeen Erritouni, University of Washington. Advisor: Adam Leache
Matías Gómez-Corrales, The University of Rhode Island. Advisor: Carlos Prada
Maggie Grundler, University of California, Berkeley. Advisor: Erica Bree Rosenblum
Sarah McPeek, University of Virginia. Advisor: Edmund Brodie III
Henry North, University of Cambridge. Advisor: Chris Jiggins
Krish Sanghvi, University of Oxford. Advisor: Irem Sepil
Jeremy Summers, University of Rochester. Advisor: Nancy Chen
Rebecca Tarnopol, University of California - Berkeley. Advisor: Noah Whiteman
 
 

2021

R. C. Lewontin Early Award in memory of George C. Gilchrist:
Tais Ribeiro, University of Maryland. Advisor: Anahi Espindola

R. C. Lewontin Early Award
 
Philip Bentz, University of Georgia. Advisor: Jim Leebens-Mack
Austin Calhoun, Illinois State University. Advisor: Ben Sadd
Maria Colt, University of Maryland. Advisor: Heidi Fisher
Danielle De La Pascua, University of California Davis. Advisor: Jennifer Gremer
Erik Iverson, The University of Texas at Austin. Advisor: Justin Havird
Matthew Kelbrick, University of Liverpool. Advisor: Siobhán O’Brien
Laura Leventhal, Stanford University. Advisor: Moises Exposito-Alonso
Jasen Liu, University of California, Davis. Advisor: Santiago Ramírez
Meghan Maciejewski, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Advisor: Alison Bell
Kelly Martin, University of Idaho. Advisor: Christine Parent
Kelly McCrum, University of Georgia. Advisor: Jill Anderson
Lisa Mesrop, University of California, Santa Barbara. Advisor: Todd Oakley
Kasey Pham, University of Florida. Advisor: Douglas Soltis
Raunak Sen, Cornell University. Advisor: Kerry Shaw
Rebecca Tarnopol, University of California - Berkeley. Advisor: Noah Whiteman
Colton Unger, University of Calgary. Advisor: Campbell Rolian
Veronica Urgiles Penafiel, Utah State University. Advisor: Molly Womack
Athmaja Viswanath, University of Toronto. Advisor: Asher Cutter
Emma Vtipilthorpe, North Carolina State University. Advisor: Seema Sheth
Gabrielle Welsh, University of Denver. Advisor: Robin Tinghitella
Xuening Zhang, Cornell University. Advisor: Anurag Agrawal


 
 
Rosemary Grant Advanced Award in memory of George C. Gilchrist:
Derek Denney, University of Georgia. Advisor: Jill Anderson.

Rosemary Grant Advanced Award
 
Colby Behrens, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Advisor: Alison Bell.
Ying Chen, Queen's University. Advisor: Stephen Lougheed.
Tanmay Dixit, University of Cambridge. Advisor: Claire Spottiswoode.
Robert Driver, East Carolina University. Advisor: Christopher Balakrishnan.
Santiago Herrera-Álvarez, University of Chicago. Advisor: Joseph Thornton.
Hanna Makowski, University of Virginia. Advisor: Laura Galloway.
Manish Pathak, Indian Institute Of Science Education And Research, Kolkata. Advisor: Sumana Annagiri.
Rozenn Pineau, Georgia Institute of Technology. Advisor: William Ratcliff.
Rosalyn Price-Waldman, Princeton University. Advisor: Mary Caswell Stoddard.
Jill Sanderson, University of Toronto. Advisor: Luke Mahler.
William Thomas, Stony Brook University. Advisor: Liliana Dávalos.


 
 
 
2020

R.C. Lewontin Award in memory of George Gilchrist:* 
Makenzie Whitener, University of Georgia. Advisor: Andrea Sweigart

R.C. Lewontin Early Award

McCall Calvert, University of Pittsburgh. Advisor: Corlett Wood
Regan Cross, Queen's University. Advisor: Christopher Eckert
Victor de Brito, Western Michigan University. Advisor: Devin Bloom
Jenna DeCurzio, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Advisor: Christina Burch
Matthew Farnitano, University of Georgia. Advisor: Andrea Sweigart
Samantha Goldman, Cornell University. Advisor: Andrew Moeller
Diler Haji, University of California, Berkeley. Advisor: Noah Whiteman
Kelsie Hunnicutt, University of Denver. Advisor: Erica Larson
Will Jarvis, University of Ottawa. Advisor: Howard Rundle
Sungsik Kong, The Ohio State University. Advisor: Laura Kubatko
Emily Lau, University of California Santa Barbara. Advisor: Todd Oakley
Michelle McCauley, Emory University. Advisor: Levi Morran
Theresa Miorin, University of Georgia. Advisor: Kelly Dyer
Benjamin Moran, Stanford University. Advisor: Molly Schumer
Emily Nonnamaker, The University of Notre Dame. Advisor: Elizabeth Archie
Klara Norden, Princeton University. Advisor: Mary C. Stoddard
Kennedy Omufwoko, Princeton University. Advisor: Sarah Kocher
Ian Rines, Illinois State University. Advisor: Ben Sadd
Srijan Seal, Ashoka University. Advisor: Imroze Khan
Ruben Tovar, The University of Texas at Austin. Advisor: David Hillis
Adrian Troya, Universidade Federal do Parana. Advisor: John Lattke
Mackenzie Urquhart-Cronish, University of British Columbia. Advisor: Amy Angert

*This award was funded by donations to the George Gilchrist Student Support Fund.

Beginning with the 2020 Graduate Research Excellence Grant competitions, SSE requested voluntary demographic information from award applicants in an effort to address bias and promote equity in awarding across multiple axes of diversity. Learn more here.


 
 
Rosemary Grant Advanced Awards in memory of George Gilchrist:*
Jessica Aguilar, University of California Berkeley. Advisor: Noah Whiteman
Brandie Quarles, Duke University. Advisor: Kathleen Donohue
 
 
Rosemary Grant Advanced Award
 
Upama Aich, Australian National University. Advisor: Michael Jennions
Giorgia Auteri, University of Michigan. Advisor: L. Lacey Knowles
Henry Ertl, University of Michigan. Advisor: Patricia Wittkopp
Alice Gadau, The Rockefeller University. Advisor: Li Zhao
Benjamin Gerstner, University of New Mexico. Advisor: Ken Whitney
Yuki Haba, Princeton University. Advisor: Carolyn McBride
Michaël Nicolaï, Universiteit Gent. Advisor: Matthew Shawkey
Arjuna Rajakumar, McGill University. Advisor: Ehab Abouheif
Alexus Roberts, University of California, Davis. Advisor: Peter Wainwright
Pamela Santana, Universidade De Sao Paulo. Advisor: Paulo Guimarães Jr.
Xueling Yi, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Advisor: Emily Latch

*These awards were funded by donations to the George Gilchrist Student Support Fund.

SSE is aware that historical and modern-day cultural biases and lack of diversity in an applicant pool may lead to biases in the allocation of grants, prizes, and awards. Beginning with the 2020 Graduate Research Excellence Grant competitions, SSE requested voluntary demographic information from award applicants in an effort to address bias and promote equity in awarding across multiple axes of diversity. Learn more here.


 

2019

R.C. Lewontin Early Award

Valentina Alaasam, University of Nevada, Reno. Advisor: Jenny Ouyang
Aurora Alvarez-Buylla,
Stanford University. Advisor: Lauren O'Connell
Matthew Biddick,
Victoria University of Wellington. Advisor: Kevin Burns
Amanda Cicchino,
Colorado State University. Advisor: W. Chris Funk
Reena Debray,
University of California, Berkeley. Advisor: Britt Koskella
Paul Dougherty,
University of Wyoming. Advisor: Matthew Carling
Trevor Faske,
University of Nevada, Reno. Advisor: Thomas Parchman
Benjamin Flanagan,
University of Southern California. Advisor: Suzanne Edmands
Connor French,
City University of New York. Advisor: Michael Hickerson
Kaitlyn Howell,
University of Texas at Arlington. Advisor: Matthew Walsh
Abigail Howell,
Arizona State University. Advisor: Reed Cartwright
Mounica Kota,
University of Minnesota. Advisor: Marlene Zuk
Jose Maldonado,
Univeristy of Texas At Arlington. Advisor: Matthew Fujita
Olivia Meyerson,
Harvard University. Advisor: Hopi Hoekstra
Libby Natola,
University of British Columbia. Advisor: Darren Irwin
Alaina Petlewski,
Cornell University. Advisor: Fay-Wei Li
Logan Sauers,
Illinois State University. Advisor: Ben Sadd
Daniel Shaw,
University of Georgia. Advisor: Michael White
Kayla Stoy,
Emory University. Advisor: Nicole Gerardo
Elena Suglia,
University of California, Davis. Advisor: Jennifer Gremer
Emilie-Katherine Tavernier,
University of Florida. Advisor: Stuart McDaniel
Takuji Usui,
University of British Columbia. Advisor: Amy Angert
Brooke Washburn,
University of Denver. Advisor: Robin Tinghitella
Jia Zheng,
University of Groningen. Advisor: Jan Komdeur

Context statement: We received 157 GREG R.C. Lewontin Early Award applications. The evaluation committee, Chaired by V.P. Tracey Chapman, selected 24 proposals for funding. Based on inferences from given names, 56.7% of Lewontin applicants and 62.5% of the winners are women. The evaluation committee consisted of 6 women and 3 men; 3 reviewers are GSAC members.  
 

Rosemary Grant Advanced Award

Katrina Catalano, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey. Advisor: Malin Pinsky
Dustin Gannon, Oregon State University. Advisor: F. Andrew Jones
Julia Kreiner, University of Toronto. Advisors: John Stinchcombe and Stephen Wright
Kara Million, Indiana University. Advisor: Curtis Lively
Shivangi Nath, University of Georgia. Advisor: Michael White.
Julianne Pelaez, University of California, Berkeley. Advisor: Noah Whiteman
George Sandler, University of Toronto. Advisors: Aneil Agrawal and Stephen Wright
Kwi Shan Seah, National University of Singapore. Advisor: Vinod Kumar Saranathan
Kate Snyder, Vanderbilt University. Advisor: Nicole Creanza
Paula Vasconcelos, Uppsala University. Advisor: Claus Rueffler
Julian Wagner, California Institute of Technology. Advisor: Joseph Parker

 

2018 Recipients

R.C. Lewontin Early Award

Aaron-Jay Alcala, University of Georgia. Advisor: Douglas Menke
Abrar Aljiboury, Syracuse University. Advisor: Jannice Friedman
Christina Balentine, The University of Texas at Austin. Advisor: Deborah Bolnick
Noori Choi, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Advisor: Eileen Hebets
Derek Filipek, University of Kentucky. Advisor: David Weisrock
Kerry Gendreau, Virginia Tech. Advisor: Joel McGlothlin
Aaron Griffing, Marquette University. Advisor: Tony Gamble
Sonal Gupta, University of Michigan. Advisor: Regina Baucom
Natalia Gutierrez-Pinto, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Advisor: Jay Storz
Lucas Henry, Princeton University. Advisor: Julien Ayroles
Jessica Hernandez, Virginia Tech. Advisor: Ignacio Moore
Anna Hiller, Louisiana State University. Advisor: Brant Faircloth
Michael Itgen, Colorado State University. Advisor: Rachel Mueller
Deidre Keating, University of Georgia. Advisor: Jill Anderson
Olivia Kosterlitz, University of Washington. Advisor: Ben Kerr
Emily Laub, University of Michigan. Advisor: Elizabeth Tibbetts
Emily Levy, Duke University. Advisor: Susan Alberts
Rachel MacTavish, University of Georgia. Advisor: Jill Anderson
Emily Powell, University of Miami. Advisor: J. Albert C. Uy
Bryan Reatini, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Advisor: Todd Vision
Alexander Shephard, University of Minnesota Twin Cities. Advisor: Emilie Snell-Rood
Ken Thompson, University of British Columbia. Advisor: Dolph Schluter

Rosemary Grant Advanced Award

John Benning, University of Minnesota. Advisor: David Moeller
William Booker, Florida State University. Advisor: Emily Lemmon
Nicole Forrester, University of Pittsburgh. Advisor: Tia-Lynn Ashman
Benjamin Goulet, Harvard University. Advisor: Robin Hopkins
Ryan Greenway, Kansas State University. Advisor: Michael Tobler
Haley Kenyon, Queen's University. Advisor: Paul Martin
Justine Lamperty, Rice University. Advisor: Amy Dunham
Rachel Moran, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Advisor: Becky Fuller
Victoria Morgan, University of California, Davis. Advisor: Richard Grosberg
William Shoemaker, Indiana University Bloomington. Advisor: Jay Lennon
Brian Tanis, Oregon State University. Advisor: Rebecca Terry
Su'ad Yoon, University of Nevada Reno. Advisor: Matthew Forister


View full page

  
 
***Note: These grants are not being offered in 2023. Application review will resume in 2023.***
 
  
 
About
| How to apply | Funded projects

About

The Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) Council invites proposals for grants up to $3,000 to help support Society-sponsored Early-career Vocational Opportunities (EVO) Workshops. This is a new program conceived by the SSE Graduate Student Advisory Council (GSAC), and supported by the SSE Council, to provide valuable learning opportunities for Society graduate students and postdocs. The topic of the workshop can be anything and material can be presented in any format, as long as it is interactive and its content serves to provide foundational skills that are appropriate for early-career SSE members in the areas of conceptual understanding, data collection, data analysis, or professional development. Not all participants must be SSE members, but the organizing applicant must be and the workshop should appeal to SSE members in general. The workshop can take place at any time or location, but should be open to learners across large geographic areas. Recipients of this award will be encouraged to submit an accompanying report or article to Evolution, if appropriate (fast tracked through review and made freely available) within 2 months of the workshop. Published articles would highlight the grant funding obtained.

How to apply

Applications will be accepted on a rolling basis. Applicants must provide a 2-3 page workshop proposal, uploaded as part of their application.

To apply, please complete the form here.

Workshop proposals should be a maximum of three pages and include:
(1) a synopsis of the workshop theme and learning goals;
(2) a tentative list of workshop instructors, including institutional affiliations and topics;
(3) a proposed location and date;
(4) a rationale for why the workshop topics and the group of instructors are particularly appropriate for a Society-sponsored workshop;
(5) a statement that potential instructors have been contacted and have agreed to participate in the development and presentation of the workshop;
(6) a detailed budget outlining the costs for conducting the workshop and details on other sources of funding; and
(7) a plan for evaluating the success of the workshop. If a similar workshop has been held before (especially by the proposed instructors), please describe when, where, approximate attendance, and any information about impact of this workshop that is available.

The SSE Workshop Selection Committee will evaluate proposals based upon the following criteria: (1) relevance to the study of evolution and to providing important, tangible skills to assist learners in this study; (2) the ability of the instructors and organizers to accomplish the goals of the workshop; and (3) evidence of, or potential for, positive impact on attendees. Proposals will also be evaluated on the degree to which they emphasize diversity at all levels (organizers to learners), including accounting for gender, nationality, and other aspects traditionally underrepresented in Society-sponsored events, and on the extent to which the training can be readily applied in the future (e.g., using open-source materials or software). Budgets can include direct workshop costs, travel support for organizers and instructors, and financial aid to help offset attendance costs; typical budget requests from SSE per proposal are expected to be $1,000-$3,000.

The Workshop Selection Committee will select proposals on a rolling basis for funding based upon budgetary allocations, and SSE expects to award 3-5 workshops each year. All applicants will be notified of the Committee’s decision within 30 days, but are encouraged to submit proposals well in advance of the proposed workshop.

Funded Projects

Graduate Student Workshop in Evolutionary Biology
Mountain Lake Biological Station, June 2019
Organizers: Amanda K. Gibson, University of Virginia; Lynda F. Delph, Indiana University; Curtis M. Lively, Indiana University

This workshop provided early career graduate students with intensive training in the fundamentals of scientific thought and communication. This workshop complemented the students’ traditional graduate training with focused, hands-on collaboration between a small group of students and faculty from diverse institutions. Students worked in groups to develop, write, and present a research proposal, participated in multiple writing workshops, and brainstormed major questions in evolutionary biology. This workshop received funding for six $500 travel grants to encourage a diverse inaugural class.

RADcamp-NYC 2019: Robust and reproducible library preparation, sequencing, assembly, and analysis of RADseq datasets
Columbia University, Fall 2019
Organizers: Isaac Overcast, City University of New York; Deren Eaton, Columbia University; Sandra Hoffberg, Columbia University; Natalia Bayona Vasquez, University of Georgia; Laura Bertola, City College of New York

This two-part workshop serves students and researchers in the New York Metro Area by teaching wet-lab and bioinformatic methods. The first part involves generating real sequence data using the 3RAD method. The second part focuses on how to analyze those data. Attendees will learn about equipment and reagents needed to prepare 3RAD libraries; the process of preparing and sequencing the libraries; bioinformatic methods for assembling the data; and downstream methods for phylogenetic and population-genetic analysis in a reproducible and highly parallelized framework. This workshop received $1,500 in funding from SSE for workshop materials.

Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics Workshop
University of Washington Friday Harbor Laboratories, June 2019
Organizers: Joe Felsenstein, University of Washington; Stevan Arnold, Oregon State University

The workshop reviewed the basics of theory in the field of evolutionary quantitative genetics and its connections to evolution observed at various time scales. The aim of the workshop was to build a bridge between the traditionally separate disciplines of quantitative genetics and phylogenetic comparative biology. SSE provided $200 registration discounts for more than a dozen SSE members to participate in the workshop.


View full page

Call for Symposia for the 2023 Evolution Meeting

ABOUT

The 2023 annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) is planned for June 21-25, 2023 in Albuquerque, NM, USA. The SSE Council invites proposals for one sponsored symposium at the meeting that highlights new topics, provides new perspectives, or generates new syntheses. This symposia will consist of six half-hour talks. 

SSE Council seriously considers the diversity of participants as a criterion for symposium funding. Symposium organizers are expected to take into account gender, seniority, nationality, and other axes of diversity traditionally underrepresented in Society symposia, and to describe their efforts in the proposal. SSE will accept requests for additional funds for dependent care costs if this would allow a speaker to accept an invitation to speak in a sponsored symposium.

The Society provides travel support for organizers and participants in sponsored symposia up to $9000 per symposium, plus any applicable costs.

HOW TO APPLY

Symposium proposals may be submitted by any SSE member and must include:

  • A title and list of organizers, with affiliations.
  • A synopsis of the symposium theme (one page). This synopsis should clarify what is novel or synthetic about the symposium and why it would be of interest to the membership of the society.
  • A statement that the symposium and its participants are unique among recent SSE sponsored symposia (one paragraph). Symposia from the past several SSE meetings should be consulted to ensure that there have not been recent related symposia (see below). In case of overlap, the proposal must differentiate itself clearly from recent symposia. If the proposed topic helps fill a gap in the areas covered by past SSE symposia (e.g., in terms of sub-field or taxonomic focus), this should be highlighted.
  • A list of invited speakers, including institutional affiliations, career stage (i.e., student, postdoc, junior scientist <10 years post-PhD, senior scientist), and tentative title. Organizers may or may not be speakers.
  • A description of how the topic of each speaker’s proposed talk fits together with the theme of the proposal (one page). This is particularly important in cases where the connection of a title to the topic and/or to the field of evolution is less clear. This section should provide a rationale for how the talks will fit together to support the theme of the symposium.
  • A statement that all potential speakers have been contacted and agree to participate in the symposium.
  • A diversity statement detailing the ways in which the organizers have ensured that the speakers reflect an array of perspectives (one paragraph). Symposium organizers are expected to take into account gender, seniority, nationality, and other aspects historically excluded in Society symposia when preparing proposals.
  • A reference section.

Proposals should be sent by email to Andrea Case (execvp@evolutionsociety.org) as a single attachment in PDF format (under subject heading: SSE Symposium Proposal). Please expect and request confirmation of receipt of the proposal.

DEADLINE

To be assured of full consideration, proposals must be received by midnight Eastern Standard Time on September 1, 2022Deadline extended to September 15, 2022.

Decisions will be sent to applicants no later than October 15, 2022. 

 




2022 Sponsored Symposium

Evolution in the tropics: 70 years since Dobzhansky (Oscar Vargas, Kathleen Kay)

Tropical diversity has long fascinated biologists, but most research to-date has addressed the ecological mechanisms maintaining diversity rather than evolutionary mechanisms generating diversity. The last review of Dobzhansky’s biotic selection hypothesis from an evolutionary perspective is now a decade old. This symposium seeks to synthesize the evolutionary history and importance of biotic and abiotic selective factors to diversification in the tropics, and to set the stage for advancing the field. Our symposium encompasses several sub-disciplines, including (but not restricted to) ecology, phylogenetics, and biogeography, and selected speakers have varied taxonomic foci, including a broad range of plants and animals.

Speakers:

  • Kathleen Kay (University of California Santa Cruz) Dobzhansky, Janzen, and speciation research in the tropics
  • Jonathan Rolland (University of British Columbia) Macroevolutionary approaches and the construction of the latitudinal diversity gradient
  • Oscar Vargas (University of California Santa Cruz) Testing hypotheses for neotropical plant diversification using comparative methods
  • Kimberly Sheldon (University of Tennessee) Janzen’s mountain passes and diversification in the tropics
  • Michael Harvey (University of Tennessee, Knoxville) Standing species richness shapes the tempo and mode of avian speciation across the Neotropics
  • Phyllis Coley (University of Utah) The role of plant-herbivore interactions in the maintenance and origin of tropical tree diversity

Past Sponsored Symposia

2019: Evolution 2019, Providence, Rhode Island

  • Integrating ecological interactions into macroevolution [Organizers: David Hembry, Marjorie Weber]
  • Outside the models for understanding the evolution of sex chromosomes and sex determination: insights from fishes, amphibians, and reptiles [Organizers: Max Lambert, Rob Denton, John Malone]

2018: [Not applicable. Joint meeting with ESEB.]

2017: Evolution 2017, Portland, Oregon

  • Evolution in Urban Ecosystems [Organizers: Emily Puckett and Jason Munshi-South]
  • The Impact of Stress on Genetic Variation [Organizer: Laurie Stevison]

2016:

  • How and why? Towards an evolutionary physiological synthesis [Organizer: Chris Muir]
  • Co-evolving genomes: Cooperation and conflict in cytonuclear interactions [Organizers: Justin Havird, Geoffrey Hill, and Daniel Sloan]

2015:

  • Epigenetics and Evolutionary Processes [Organizers: Joshua Banta and Christina Richards]
  • The multiple dimensions of biodiversity science [Organizers: Ana Carnaval and Christopher Dick]
  • When Gene Flow Really Matters: Gene Flow and Applied Plant Evolutionary Biology [Organizer: Norman C. Ellstrand]

View full page
In 2018, SSE launched a series of New Faculty Profiles to highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers. Find out how to submit a nomination here.

2022

Dr. Layton smiling at the camera with sand and water in the background.

Dr. Kara Layton

Dr. Layton is a Lecturer in Marine Biology in the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Aberdeen stuyding diversity in aquatic ecosystems with a focus on hyperdiverse marine invertebrates. Learn more in her profile.

Moises with a beard and gray shirt smiling at the camera in front of a leafy green background.

Dr. Moisés Expósito-Alonso

Dr. Expósito-Alonso is a staff associate & assistant professor (by courtesy) of Biology at the Carnegie Institution for Science and Stanford University stuyding whether and how plants will evolve to keep pace with climate change. Learn more in his profile.

December 2021

Megan DeMarche in a gray sweater in front of a leafy green background smiling at the camera

Dr. Megan DeMarche

Dr. DeMarche is an assistant professor in the Department of Plant Biology at the University of Georgia stuyding the ecology and evolution of wild plant populations, with an emphasis on responses to global change. Learn more in her profile.

Dr. Kathleen Grogan

Dr. Grogan is an assistant professor in the Departments of Anthropology & Biological Sciences at the University of Cincinnati stuyding the impact of genetic and epigenetic variation on differences in fitness across environmental conditions. Learn more in her profile.

September 2021

Dr. Smukowski Heil in a blue button up and gray sweater with shoulder length wavy brown hair smiling at the camera

Dr. Caiti Smukowski Heil

Dr. Smukowski Heil is an assistant professor in the Department Biological Sciences at North Carolina State University stuyding processes that create and maintain variation in populations using genetics, genomics, and experimental evolution in Saccharomyces yeast. Learn more in her profile.

August 2021

Kate smiling at the camera wearing a pink shirt

Dr. Kate Laskowski

Dr. Laskowski is an assistant professor in the Department of Evolution & Ecology at the University of California Davis stuyding how evolution has shaped the developmental mechanisms that determine how individuals use and integrate all the different sources of information they're exposed to over their lifetimes to determine their behavioral phenotypes. Learn more in her profile.

July 2021

Janna Willoughby wearing rectangular glasses and smiling at the camera

Dr. Janna Willoughby

Dr. Willoughby is an assistant professor in the School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences at Auburn University stuyding how environmental change influences genetic diversity and complex traits like fitness, using banner-tailed kangaroo rat populations and freshwater mussels. Learn more in her profile.

June 2021

Dr. Moyers in a blue shirt and dark hair pulled back smiling in front of a blurred green background

Dr. Brook Moyers

Dr. Moyers is an assistant professor in the Biology Department at the University of Massachusetts Boston stuyding how and why traits vary within plant species to address real world problems, including food production and environmental contamination. Learn more in her profile.

April 2021

Nora Mitchell in a red shirt and black backwards baseball cap standing in field smiling at the camera

Dr. Nora Mitchell

Dr. Mitchell is an assistant professor in the Biology Department at the University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire stuyding plant evolution and hybridization at multiple phylogenetic and temporal scales. Learn more in her profile.

Jacqueline Sztepanacz in a blue shirt smiling at the camera

Dr. Jacqueline Sztepanacz

Dr. Lamichhaney is an assistant professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Toronto stuyding why traits stop evolving, using Drosophila as a model organism. Learn more in her profile.

March 2021

Sangeet Lamichhaney smiling at the camera

Dr. Sangeet Lamichhaney

Dr. Lamichhaney is an assistant professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at Kent State University stuyding the relative roles of evolutionary processes, such as genetic adaptation and phenotypic plasticity that underly trait evolution. Learn more in his profile.

Corlett Wood outside with sunglasses on her head smiling at the camera

Dr. Corlett Wood

Dr. Wood is an assistant professor in the Department of Biology at the University of Pennsylvania stuyding the evolution and ecology of host-symbiont interactions, especially interactions involving multiple symbionts. Learn more in her profile.

December 2020

Dr. Haw Chuan Lim smiling at the camera

Dr. Haw Chuan Lim

Dr. Lim is an assistant professor in the Department of Biology at George Mason University stuyding avian phylogenetics, population genetics, speciation and biogeography. Learn more in his profile.

October 2020

Alison Pischedda smiling at the camera

Dr. Alison Pischedda

Dr. Pischedda is an assistant professor in the Department of Biology at Barnard College stuyding the evolutionary and genetic causes and consequences of sexual selection and sexual conflict using Drosophila melanogaster. Learn more in her profile.

August 2020

Rebecca Tarvin headshot

Dr. Rebecca Tarvin

Dr. Tarvin is an assistant professor in the Department of Integrative Biology and Assistant Curator in the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology at the University of California, Berkeley stuyding causal genetic mechanisms underlying novel traits, phenotypic diversification at macro and micro-evolutionary scales, and factors that promote and constrain biodiversity. Learn more in her profile

Jesse Weber headshot

Dr. Jesse Weber

Dr. Weber is an assistant professor in the Department of Integrative Biology
University of Wisconsin-Madison using genetic approaches to better understand how and why vertebrates coevolve with their macroparasitess. Learn more in his profile

May 2020

Dr. Michael Landis

Dr. Landis is an assistant professor in the Department of Biology at Washington University in St. Louis studying how evolutionary processes shape biodiversity over deep timescales. Learn more in his profile

Dr. Clare Scott Chialvo

Dr. Scott Chialvo is an assistant professor in the Biology Department at Appalachian State University studying the evolution of novel biochemical adaptations and their impact on the biodiversity of organisms. Learn more in her profile

April 2020

Dr. Tory Hendry

Dr. Hendry is an assistant professor in the Department of Microbiology at Cornell University studying how interactions with eukaryotic hosts influence bacterial evolution. Learn more in her profile.

Dr. Laura Lagomarsino

Dr. Lagomarsino is an assistant professor in the Assistant Professor in the Department of Biological Sciences and the Herbarium Director at Louisiana State University studying the origin and maintenance of Neotropical plant biodiversity. Learn more in her profile

March 2020

Dr. Nicholas Kooyers

Dr. Kooyers is an assistant professor in the Department of Biology at the University of Louisiana, Lafayette studying how often local adaptation occurs in nature and the genetic and physiological mechanisms that either constrain or facilitate local adaptation. Learn more in his profile

Dr. Susana M. Wadgymar

Dr. Wadgymar is an assistant professor in the Biology Department at Davidson College studying the processes that promote or hinder adaptations in plants, with particular interests in the influences of genetics vs. the environment, climate change, and conservation. Learn more in her profile

February 2020

Dr. Gideon Bradburd

Dr. Bradburd is an assistant professor in the Department of Integrative Biology at Michigan State University studying the role of geography in structuring patterns of population genetic variation and learning about the processes that shaped those patterns. Learn more in his profile

Dr. Margarita Lopez-Uribe

Dr. Lopez-Uribe is an assistant professor in the Department of Entomology at Penn State University studying how evolutionary history, ecological interactions and human management influence bee population responses to the unique biotic and abiotic conditions of agricultural ecosystems. Learn more in her profile

January 2020

Dr. Vanessa Koelling

Dr. Koelling is an assistant professor in the Department of Biology and Environmental Science at Auburn University at Montgomery studying the evolutionary mechanisms important in plant mating system evolution and speciation, and the causal genetic changes underlying plant adaptations. Learn more in her profile

Dr. Felipe Zapata

Dr. Zapata is an assistant professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of California, Los Angeles studying how evolution has generated biological diversity, in particular plant diversity. Learn more in his profile

December 2019

Dr. Nathaniel Sharp

Dr. Sharp is an assistant professor in the Genetics Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison studying mutations, their spectrum of effects on genome sequences, and their consequences for individual fitness and population growth. Read his full profile here.

Dr. Marjorie Weber

Dr. Weber is an assistant professor in the Department of Plant Biology at Michigan State University studying cooperative and antagonistic interactions between plants and insects. Read her full profile here.

November 2019

Dr. Genevieve Kozak

Dr. Kozak is an assistant professor in the Department of Biology at the University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth studying how assortative mating evolves during speciation. Read her full profile here.


 
 

Dr. Diogo Borges Provete

Dr. Borges Provete is an assistant professor in the Institute of Biosciences at the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul studying how the interaction between microevolutionary processes at the population scale change trait distribution and scale up to influence patterns at the metacommunity scale. Read his full profile here.

October 2019

Dr. Emily Josephs

Dr. Josephs is an assistant professor in the Plant Biology department at Michigan State University studying how various evolutionary forces shape patterns of genetic variation and trait variation in natural and domesticated plant species. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Jonathan Puritz

Dr. Puritz is an assistant professor in the Biological Sciences Department at University of Rhode Island studying how natural and anthropogenic processes affect the evolution of marine populations through the lens of larval dispersal. Read his full profile here.

September 2019

Dr. Nancy Chen

Dr. Chen is an assistant professor in the Department of Biology at the University of Rochester studying the evolution of natural populations on short timescales. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Natalie Steinel

Dr. Steinel is an assistant professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Massachusetts Lowell studying the evolutionary origins of the vertebrate adaptive immune system and the co-evolution of hosts and pathogens. Read her full profile here.

August 2019

Dr. Kevin Arbuckle

Dr. Arbuckle is a lecturer in the Department of Biosciences at Swansea University studying the origin and evolution of biodiversity in venomous and poisonous animals. Read his full profile here.

Dr. Lauren O'Connell

Dr. O'Connell is assistant professor in the Department of Biology at Stanford University studying how genetic and environmental factors contribute to biological diversity and adaptation. Read her full profile here.

July 2019

Dr. Seema Sheth

Dr. Sheth is assistant professor in the Department of Plant and Microbial Biology at North Carolina State University studying how quantitative genetic variation and demographic processes influence the dynamics of adaptation to novel conditions. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Yoav Ram

Dr. Ram is a senior lecturer in the School of Computer Science at IDC Herzliya studying the evolution of processes that generate and transmit variation, both genetic and phenotypic. Read his full profile here.

June 2019

Dr. Kathleen Gray Ferris

Dr. Ferris is an assistant professor in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Tulane University studying the genetic, phenotypic, and environmental basis of adaptation and speciation in Mimulus. Read her full profile here.

Dr. C. Brandon Ogbunu

Dr. Ogbunu is an assistant professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Brown University studying the complex interactions underlying disease phenomena across many scales. Read his full profile here.

May 2019

Dr. Rachel Germain

Dr. Germain is an assistant professor in the Department of Zoology & the Biodiversity Research Centre at the University of British Columbia studying the ecology and evolution of species coexistence in spatially-structured landscapes. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Josef Uyeda

Dr. Uyeda is an assistant professor of evolutionary biology in the Department of Biological Sciences at Virginia Polytechnic and State University studying the drivers of phenotypic evolution at the macroevolutionary scale. Read his full profile here.

March-April 2019

Dr. Daniel Field

Dr. Field is an assistant professor in evolutionary paleobiology in the Department of Earth Sciences at the University of Cambridge studying the macroevolutionary history of birds. Read his full profile here.

Dr. Fay-Wei Li

Dr. Li is an assistant professor at the Boyce Thompson Institute on the Cornell University campus studying the evolutionary processes at the gene, genome, and microbiome levels that shaped the plant diversity. Read his full profile here.

February 2019

Dr. Katie McGhee

Dr. McGhee is an assistant professor in the Department of Biology at Sewanee: The University of the South studying the role parental effects have in shaping offspring behavior in a variety of fish species. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Scott A. Taylor

Dr. Taylor is an assistant professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Colorado Boulder studying the genetic architecture of reproductive isolation and the genetic bases of traits relevant to speciation. Read his full profile here.

January 2019

Dr. Emily B. Sessa

Dr. Sessa is an assistant professor at the University of Florida studying the evolutionary and ecological processes that shape plant diversity. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Ricardo Mallarino

Dr. Mallarino is an assistant professor at Princeton University studying the genetic and developmental mechanisms driving the evolution of  body form and structure in vertebrates. Read his full profile here.

November-December 2018

Dr. Melissa Kemp

Dr. Kemp is an assistant professor at the University of Texas at Austin in the Department of Integrative Biology studying how environmental perturbations shape vertebrate communities through time and space. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Anahí Espíndola

Dr. Espíndola is an assistant professor in the Department of Entomology at the University of Maryland, College Park studying how the abiotic and biotic environment affects the way species interact and diversify. Read her full profile here.

October 2018

Dr. Michael Sheehan

Dr. Sheehan is an assistant professor in the Department of Neurobiology and Behavior at Cornell University studying the causes and consequences of social evolution. Read his full profile here.

Dr. Aleeza Gerstein

Dr. Gerstein is an assistant professor in the Departments of Microbiology & Statistics at the University of Manitoba studying how different ecological and genomic factors influence the rate and predictability of evolution. Read her full profile here.

September 2018

Dr. Sara Branco

Dr. Branco is an assistant professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at Montana State University studying the ecology and evolution of fungi to further understand the ecological factors that generate and maintain fungal diversity. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Shane Campbell-Staton

Dr. Campbell-Staton is an assistant professor jointly appointed to the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department and the Institute for Society and Genetics at the University of California Los Angeles studying how climate shapes demographic history and adaptation over prehistoric and contemporary time periods. Read his full profile here.

August 2018

Dr. Emily Kane

Dr. Kane is an Assistant Professor of Biology at Georgia Southern University. She studies ecological and evolutionary biomechanics; specifically, locomotion, feeding, and the links between those systems. Read her full profile here.

Dr. David Des Marais

Dr. Des Marais is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He studies how the physical environment impacts the evolution and ecology of natural plant populations. Read his full profile here.

July 2018

Dr. Claudia Bank

Dr. Bank is the Principal Investigator of the Evolutionary Dynamics Group at the Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia in Oeiras, Portugal. She studies how populations adapt and diversify, with a specific interest in the role of epistasis during these processes. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Stacy Krueger-Hadfield

Dr. Krueger-Hadfield is an Assistant Professor at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. She studies the evolution of sex, using algal and invertebrate models to investigate the mechanisms that underlie the maintenance of life cycle and mating system variation. Read her full profile here.

June 2018

Dr. Martha Muñoz

Dr. Muñoz is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at Virginia Tech studying ecological processes and evolutionary patterns related to physiology. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Michael White

Dr. White is an Assistant Professor in the Genetics Department at the University of Georgia studying the evolution of sex chromosomes in threespine stickleback fish. Read his full profile here.

May 2018

Dr. Alison Wright

Dr. Wright is a NERC Independent Research Fellow at the University of Sheffield studying evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females and the genomic mechanisms that lead to their resolution. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Cassie Stoddard

Dr. Stoddard is an assistant professor of biology at Princeton University studying avian vision and coloration and the development and structure of avian eggs. Read her full profile here.

April 2018

Dr. Jeremy Yoder

Dr. Yoder is an assistant professor of biology at California State University Northridge studying coevolution and the population genomics of local adaptation. Read his full profile here.

Dr. Megan Phifer-Rixey

Dr. Phifer-Rixey is an assistant professor of biology at Monmouth University studying the genetics of adaptation. Read her full profile here.

 

March 2018

Dr. Rayna C. Bell

Dr. Bell is a vertebrate research zoologist at the National Museum of Natural History studying the mechanisms that generate ecological and evolutionary diversity in amphibians and reptiles. Read her full profile here.

Dr. Sarah W. Fitzpatrick

Dr. Fitzpatrick is an assistant professor at the W.K. Kellogg Biological Station at Michigan State University studying how genetic drift, gene flow, and selection interact in small and recently isolated populations in a changing environment. Read her full profile here.

How to submit a New Faculty Profile nomination

We welcome nominations (and self-nominations) of SSE members who are within 3 years of starting an independent research position. We wish to highlight the diversity of positions, institutions, study systems, approaches and researchers in SSE. To nominate yourself or someone else, please fill out the nomination form: SSE New Faculty Profiles Nomination Form.


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Rayna C. Bell
Research Zoologist, Curator of Amphibians + Reptiles
Department of Vertebrate Zoology
National Museum of Natural History
Smithsonian Institution
www.raynacbell.com

 

Start date: November 2015
PhD: Department of Ecology + Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University; advisor Dr. Kelly Zamudio
Postdoc: [Chancellor’s Postdoctoral Fellow] Museum of Vertebrate Zoology + Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley; advisor Dr. Jimmy McGuire

About NMNH:

The NMNH hosts seven million public visitors per year and maintains the largest and most comprehensive natural history collection in the world.  The Department of Vertebrate Zoology is composed of research scientists and museum specialists who conduct specimen-based research and provide access to the national collection. Research scientists/curators maintain organism-focused research programs, oversee growth and use of the collection, and participate in public outreach and education.

About your research:

As an organismal evolutionary biologist, I am broadly interested in identifying mechanisms that generate ecological and evolutionary diversity in amphibians and reptiles. Currently, my research program addresses questions in three areas: 1) micro-evolutionary processes that shape population differentiation, 2) evolution of novel coloration phenotypes, and 3) evolution of the frog visual system. Underpinning these three broad areas, my research is motivated by biodiversity discovery and capacity building for research and conservation in Central Africa.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

My first week on the job, one of the newer curators at NMNH warned me that learning to say “no” is key to staying sane and actually getting your research done. I think this advice holds for most new PIs and with so many tempting research and non-research opportunities at the Smithsonian, it’s been harder to implement than I expected! So far I’ve said “no” to one service commitment and two field expeditions, and I felt guilty and serious FOMO each time. Lots of room for improvement! It’s also been challenging for me to find uninterrupted blocks of time to write or analyze data, so I recently started hiding out in a coffee shop a couple mornings each week.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/will you choose new lab members?

Yes! We have an amazing fellowship program at the Smithsonian and an NSF-REU site at NMNH that provide opportunities for researchers at different career stages (postdoctoral, graduate and undergraduate students) to spend time working with scientists and the collections. I’m not currently affiliated with a graduate program so I don’t formally advise graduate students, but I really enjoy mentoring postdocs and hosting visiting students through these programs. Our main criteria in the selection process are the intellectual merit of the proposed research and how the applicant will leverage the national collections and our research facilities through their project.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution?

Of course! My first (and thus far, only) publication in Evolution is one of my dissertation chapters “Reed frog diversification in the Gulf of Guinea: overseas dispersal, the progression rule, and in situ speciation”. Having my work accepted in our society journal – where so many timeless papers are published – felt like a major accomplishment, and I was lucky to have reed frogs featured on the cover! Other than being my first Evolution paper, this particular publication really stands out for me because about a week after I submitted the manuscript, my computer was stolen. I’d been traveling so my most recent backup was over a month old. I was so relieved that the most recent versions of the files were safe in the manuscript submission site and that I didn’t lose everything!

Besides research, how do you promote science?

Being based at a natural history museum provides lots of opportunities to promote science and interact with a broad public audience. This can range from three-minute “big picture” research presentations for our board members to events in our Q?rius science education space where visitors interact one-on-one with museum scientists. As curators, we also get information requests from science journalists and field a lot of random questions from the general public, so I’m always working to improve my science communication skills.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

If you’re serious about the academic track, take ownership of your graduate education and start acting like a mini-PI. This means building a research program that you can call your own by the time you defend, applying for research grants, developing collaborations inside and outside of your institution, presenting your work at professional meetings, mentoring undergraduate researchers, and getting teaching experience (beyond being a TA). Also, take time to celebrate milestones and remember that this is supposed to be fun!

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

Defending my vegetable garden from urban wildlife and learning to play ukulele.  

 

 

 

 

 

Hyperolius drewesi. Photo by Andrew Stanbridge.

 

 

 

 

 

Rayna catching frogs on São Tomé.

Photo by Andrew Stanbridge


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Sarah W. Fitzpatrick
Assistant Professor
W.K. Kellogg Biological Station
Department of Integrative Biology
Colorado State University
www.swfitz.com




Started faculty position:
 January 2017
PhD: Department of Biology, Colorado State University; advisor: Dr. Chris Funk
Postdoc: W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University; advisors: Dr. Jeff Conner & Dr. Gary Mittelbach

About the lab: 

My lab is based at Michigan State University’s Kellogg Biological Station (KBS), located ~70 miles southwest from main campus. KBS is unique as field stations go because of our resident research faculty and year-round research and education facilities. I really enjoy being a part of the tight-knit field station community, but also connecting with the larger ecology and evolutionary biology network on the main campus not too far away.

About the research:

Research in my lab encompasses evolution, ecology, and conservation of contemporary populations. A major focus is on understanding the fitness effects of altered connectivity and gene flow patterns – often using ‘genetic rescue’ as a framework that links evolution, demography, and persistence of small populations. How do genetic drift, gene flow, and selection interact in small and recently isolated populations in a changing environment? We approach this question using genomic tools, experiments, GIS, mark-recapture, and pedigree reconstruction. We work on a variety of organisms, but tend towards the scaly and slimy.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

One of my main challenges has been organizing a ‘strategic plan’ for my research program for the next few years. As someone who has broad interests and is easily excitable, it has been difficult to know how to partition time and resources. Should I invest heavily in collecting preliminary data for what I view as my most immediately fundable project? Or, use this time to branch out into new ‘higher risk’ directions? Do I prioritize development of local systems and field sites or pursue my strong interest in international work? So far I’ve taken a shotgun approach – trying to do a little bit of everything, but I know I will need to narrow based on which projects gain momentum. I am looking forward to having students join the lab who will likely shape some of these directions. I’ve taken comfort in advice from Judy Bronstein, who told me, “Careers are long – there is a lot of time to explore.”

Also, imposter syndrome is a real thing.

What does becoming an SSE member mean to you or your career?

SSE membership has taught me the value of active societal affiliation and engagement. I’ve received several forms of meaningful support from SSE throughout my early career: an outreach grant that facilitated K-12 classroom visits and the start of a citizen-science led camera trapping effort to bolster biodiversity appreciation in Trinidad, the Rosemary Grant Research Award funded an important piece of my dissertation, the Hamilton Award gave me confidence in an area I am insecure about – public speaking.

Even more impactful than the forms of support that can be written on a CV has been developing a community of colleagues, friends, and mentors within the society. I am especially grateful to the personal mentorship and support I’ve received from many inspiring female role models within the SSE community, many of whom are currently on SSE council! I cannot overstate how critical these role models have been to my career development.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

By sharing exuberant and unashamed enthusiasm for Earth’s biodiversity through teaching, art, and story-telling. I think enthusiasm for organisms is broadly transferrable and is a powerful way to access curiosity and appreciation.

What is your favorite app?

eBird!

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

A feeling for the organism – biography of Barbara McClintock

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

When I was working on my first research project as a Cornell undergraduate in Kelly Zamudio’s lab I was naïvely careless about file organization and backing up data. At one point, while working on manuscript revisions, I needed to track down few key input files needed to rerun an analysis. Kelly found my rat’s nest of a project folder on the lab computer and, understandably, told me ‘it was an embarrassing mess’ and ‘your whole paper stands on a house of cards’. GULP!

I found the files (phew!) and along with building a more sturdy foundation for my paper, developed an appreciation and tools for organized version control, data, and analyses files, which I now emphasize and teach to all new trainees.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

Anything on or in the water, fly-fishing, ultimate frisbee, and playing with my dog Napo.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Male and female Vermillion darters, from Turkey Creek, Alabama

View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Jeremy Yoder
Assistant Professor of Biology
California State University Northridge
http://lab.jbyoder.org

 

 

 

 

Start Date: August 2017
PhD: University of Idaho, with Olle Pellmyr
Postdoc: University of Minnesota, with Peter Tiffin
Postdoc: University of British Columbia, with Sally Aitken

About California State University Northridge (CSUN):

CSUN is the largest campus of the CSU system, with more than 41,000 students, 72% of whom identify as non-white. Our Biology program is similarly big and diverse, with 41 tenure-track faculty organized in five "areas" of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology; Cellular, Molecular & Physiological Biology; Marine Biology; Microbiology; and Genetics & Developmental Biology — I'm one of four new TT faculty this year.

About the research:

I study coevolution and the population genomics of local adaptation, particularly in mutualisms. I've used evolutionary theory, population genetics and genomics, greenhouse experiments, and field studies. Most of my empirical work has been with the Joshua tree-yucca moth pollination interaction and the legume-rhizobium interaction (working with Medicago truncatula as a model); but in my second postdoc with Sally Aitken, I focused on adaptation to climate by lodgepole pine and interior spruce.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

A huge challenge of setting up the lab has been prioritizing, and timing. I've tried to spend my first year getting started with projects that will pay off in the longer term, but I'm also trying to wrap up postdoctoral work and save startup funding — and my own energy — for later down the line when I have grad students and their projects to support and supervise.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

I have been pretty lucky with recruiting, I think. I have two very good prospective students to start next fall, and I'm expecting I'll want another one or two to start in 2019. I've been looking specifically for students who can articulate how their research interests and career plans fit with the kind of work I do, and with the program at CSUN. We have a fully supported, Master's-only graduate program in Biology, which has some advantages for students interested in that kind of degree, and the grad student community is terrific.

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I've been a member of SSE since I joined for my very first scientific conference, Evolution 2006 at Stony Brook. I presented the very first data of my PhD research, and was kind of awestruck to have Doug Futuyma come to the talk and ask a (non-terrifying) question. One of the things I continue to appreciate about Evolution is how accessible it usually makes folks at the top of the field to students who are just starting out.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

I'm currently teaching my first class, which isn't evolution per se but flowering plant systematics — and I've gotten, I think, a lot of evolution into it. I've seen students struggle with some of the same concepts that were hard for me to wrap my head around, back in undergrad, particularly the idea that evolutionary change may not always be driven by natural selection. Next semester I get to take on our core evolution course, though, and we'll see what else comes up.

Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

I've been involved in science outreach since graduate school, mostly through blogs. I'm continuing that as that manager/editor of The Molecular Ecologist (www.molecularecologist.com) though I don't get to write for that venue as much as I'd like to. I also very occasionally pitch the odd article or book review to more mainstream sites or publications, and it's fun to get to write about biology for a truly broad audience.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

I've been experimenting with using Toggl (www.toggl.com) to track my time — shout-out to Holly Moeller at UC San Diego for pointing me to it — and it's pretty helpful for making me more mindful of what I'm doing on days when I really don't have a moment to spare, which is most of them now. Alternatively, it's mostly just showing me how much time teaching a class for the first time can eat up.

What advice would you give to a starting graduate student or postdoc?

For both starting grad students and postdocs, my advice would be: figure out what comes next. I think I did a pretty good job of this as a grad student — I started looking for postdocs and had a great position sorted out when I graduated — but I was less ready to be strategic once I actually got to the postdoc stage. I was not really ready for how much effort the faculty job market would take, and the degree to which the promotion from postdoc to faculty is beyond planning. I'm very, very happy with how it's worked out in the end, but if you'd told me when I finished my PhD that it'd take six years and two postdocs to land a tenure-track position, I think I'd have put more effort into applications earlier on, and maybe carved out some time for non-academic career path development, too.

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

My best talk-catastrophe story was at an invited symposium at the Canadian Society for Evolution and Ecology meeting last spring. I brought slides in PDF format, as I always do, because PDFs are pretty close to fool-proof. But the laptops provided by the conference center had some nonstandard PDF reader installed, and when I got to my first data slide, it glitched in just the right way to remove only my data — the slide title, the explanatory text, the axes and labels were all there, but the actual line plotting the result was gone. I had to scramble for the PowerPoint version and I lost a couple minutes and the rest of the talk was a rushed mess.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One of Dr. Yoder’s study organisms, Medicago truncatula.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Yoder with another study organism, Yucca brevifolia, outside of Barstow, CA.

View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Megan Phifer-Rixey
Assistant Professor
Biology Department
Monmouth University
phiferrixeylab.com





Start Date: Fall 2016
PhD: University of Pennsylvania; mentored by Dr. Paul S. Schmidt
Postdoc: University of Arizona and the University of California, Berkeley, both with Dr. Michael W. Nachman

About Monmouth University:

Monmouth University is a primarily undergraduate institution located on the Jersey Shore. We are known for our polling institute, enthusiastic basketball fans, and our lovely campus that includes the mansion from the movie Annie. I am an Assistant Professor in the Biology Department. Our faculty are active in a variety of research areas, including a growing Marine and Environmental Biology Program. One of our biggest strengths is our emphasis on meaningful research experiences for undergraduates.

About the research program:

In the broadest sense, my research program addresses questions about evolution in wild populations, ranging from population genetics to speciation. Right now, my lab’s main focus is on the genetics of adaptation and, in particular, understanding how wild house mice have successfully adapted to diverse environments worldwide. Our research is integrative—bringing together field work, bench work, phenotyping, bioinformatics, and computational approaches. Of course, we are located right on the Jersey Shore, so we are starting new projects using population genetics and genomics to answer questions about ecologically important regional fisheries.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Without any doubt, the biggest challenge is time. As a new PI, you are essentially running a business—managing a budget, applying for grants, directing a lab, etc., while also teaching and mentoring. Somewhere in there, you have to make space to write and be creative. All of this is happening while you are (generally) in a brand new place and working to expand your professional network and your personal support network. I spend a lot of time on Skype! The good news is that you become at peace with the struggle. It is simply not possible to move everything along quickly, so you have to prioritize and learn to say no. When I was a grad student, I worried I would not have enough clever ideas to be a PI. Now I realize the bigger challenge is to pick and choose wisely and to carve out the time needed to pursue those ideas.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

I was surprised by how much and how quickly I became invested in the success of my students. I expected to develop strong relationships with my research students, but at a small university like Monmouth, you also get to know the students in your classes. When they are succeeding, you feel amazing, and when they are stumbling, you find yourself working hard to figure out ways to reach them.

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

This is not so much funny as it is representative of how friendly the meetings are. In the summer of 2012, I was on a three-month trek to collect wild house mice with my son, who was about 16 months old, and my husband. That year, the meeting was in Ottawa, and it was a Joint Congress, so we decided to take a break from collecting in Vermont and drive to Ottawa. We had fun crossing the border with all of my odd supplies, but we made it to the meeting on time. We arrived at the hotel to a very crowded lobby. While my husband wrangled our stuff, I got in line with my not very happy son who immediately started letting everyone know how he felt. The person ahead of us in line turned around and started chatting with us, offering to let us go ahead. My son calmed down and we had a nice conversation. Jonathan Losos did not know me, but he was very kind that day. My children now regularly go to meetings with me, but that was the first meeting I attended with my son, and it meant a lot that he was welcomed. It has been heartening to see how much effort SSE has made to make the annual meetings family-friendly.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution meeting was in 2006 at Stony Brook University. At the time, I was in the thick of my field season investigating shell color variation in Littorina obtusata (flat periwinkles) throughout the Gulf of Maine. I was spending weeks alternating between collecting snails at crazy hours and running experiments at crazy hours. In my memory, it feels like I showed up, showered, and then gave a talk.

One of the special things about the Evolution Meeting is how welcoming it is to students. I gave a talk and people came! The question and answer portion was lively, and trainees and PIs came up to me after to discuss my work. I met many people in my field for the first time at that meeting. Importantly, I started to see myself as part of that field. Now, I am looking forward to bringing my own students to the meetings.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I have an amazing lab of undergraduates. Last summer, one of them put together a proposal to bring a DNA extraction workshop to local elementary schools. His proposal was successful, and we are now funded by the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). We piloted the project last semester and, with the help of another undergraduate, we will be working with >150 students this semester.

The lab has come together to run this project and we now plan to do a new project every year, with different lab members taking the lead, emphasizing different aspects of evolution. Funding for outreach programs is limited, and the investments that SSE and ESEB make are absolutely critical. Because we have funding, we can provide supply kits to each classroom, and the lab can be run in the future without our help. These programs are low cost, but have a big impact.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

I teach Evolution both as a standalone course and as part of our Introductory Biology sequence. I think the mathematical framework for understanding evolutionary processes is elegant and comforting. With a little probability and statistics, we can start to understand the balance between mutation, selection, and drift and make sense of messy reality. My students, however, do not agree on the “comforting” part. We work through it, though, and I have gotten some good advice from colleagues on how to integrate quantitative skills into the courses.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

I aggressively calendar everything. This helps me plan my time, but it is really more of a mental tool to help me compartmentalize, effectively switch from one task to another. This strategy works best when you are realistic about the time that tasks will take. I also recommend scheduling time to read and to just think. Don’t necessarily wait for vast unbroken time (which never appears). Papers can be read in an hour, but do try and schedule some big blocks of time.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

You can do it! You are already doing it. Value your contributions and your ideas. While you may be overwhelmed with data, writing, and applying for jobs, invest in yourself and take the time to develop your own research program for the future.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

House mouse (Mus musculus). Photo by Gabriela Heyer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

Read the Society for the Study of Evolution Data Privacy and Transparency Policy here.


View full page

View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

 Dr. Alison Wright
NERC Independent Research Fellow
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences
University of Sheffield
www.alisonewright.co.uk

 

 

 

Start Date: January 2017
PhD: Department of Zoology, University of Oxford; supervised by Professor Judith Mank
Postdoc: Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London; supervised by Professor Judith Mank

About the lab:

My lab is based in the Department of Animal and Plant Sciences at the University of Sheffield, located in the north of England next to the beautiful Peak District. Our faculty has a strong grounding in evolutionary biology and molecular ecology, as well as a really friendly and integrated ethos, so there is lots of opportunity for exciting collaborations! My position is funded by a fellowship from NERC, one of the UK's leading science funding bodies, and includes significant research costs for five years.

About my research

Research in my lab is centered on understanding the genomic and evolutionary processes underpinning sex differences. In particular, we study evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females and the genomic mechanisms that lead to their resolution. We approach these questions using transcriptomic and genomic data across a number of different species. A large part of our work focuses on sex chromosomes, as they are the only region of the genome to differ between the sexes and are therefore predicted to be hotspots of sexual conflict and sexual dimorphisms.

How have you prepared to be a PI?

I did a lot of research to prepare for the transition from postdoc to PI. I have a number of great mentors who provided valuable tips and advice on what to expect, and the skills that are necessary to succeed. I can really recommend Mohamed Noor’s book You’re hired! Now what? for a step-by-step guide that deals with time management, supervising a research team, and career progression. I was also very lucky to be supervised by Judith Mank, who is not only an outstanding scientist but also a fantastic mentor. Working in her group was a real pleasure and I would like to think that I picked up some valuable skills for how to manage a productive, supportive and enthusiastic research group.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/will you choose new lab members?

Definitely, I am always looking to work with people with new skills and ideas. Key things I look for in new lab members are passion, motivation, and creativity, as well as a strong sense of teamwork. There are a number of fantastic graduate schemes available across the University of Sheffield. The department is also very supportive of early career researchers, which is extremely helpful for attracting independent research fellowships for postdocs.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution meeting was in 2014 in Raleigh, NC and I have attended all but one of the meetings since then. As a PhD student, being able to give a talk in front of this international audience of evolutionary biologists was an invaluable experience. I believe that this opportunity for early career researchers to present their work is one of the major strengths of the Evolution meetings. It was also an excellent chance to meet many scientists in my field for the first time. This meeting is also particularly memorable as we went for a lab breakfast and had iced tea and grits – one of the highlights of the week!

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution?

Yes, the third chapter of my thesis, ‘Independent stratum formation on the avian sex chromosomes reveals inter-chromosomal gene conversion and predominance of purifying selection on the W chromosome’ was my first publication in Evolution. I am very proud of this paper and was extremely honoured to receive the R.A Fisher prize in 2014, which meant that I was able to attend and present my research at the Evolution 2015 meeting in Guarujá, Brazil.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I think that an important part of our role as scientists is to engage and enthuse members of the public with the research we are doing. Later this year, I am participating in an exciting and novel outreach scheme called Soapbox Science, where I will be presenting my research in a public space and engaging in scientific debate with members of the community. This event is also particularly important as it seeks to actively promote the role of women in science and raise the visibility of women scientists amongst the general public. More generally, the University of Sheffield, and our department in particular, have a number of impressive outreach programs to increase awareness of our research.

Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

Yes, several! I am a big fan of two blogs in particular, Dynamic Ecology and The Molecular Ecologist. They are fantastic platforms for broad opinion pieces and syntheses of research areas, but they also cover a range of topics about scientific life that I find especially useful as a new group leader. In particular, the interview series How Molecular Ecologists Work is one of my favourites. It is fascinating to read about the varied working styles and approaches of scientists whose work I really admire. More broadly, the science podcasts from the BBC radio programme In Our Time are a great way to learn something unexpected!

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Be confident and put yourself forward. In doing so, you create opportunities and develop skills that you will benefit from throughout your career. Present your work at international conferences – they are great opportunities for building your network of potential collaborators and mentors. Apply for prizes and research grants – even if you aren’t successful, you are learning valuable skills that will be essential later in your career. Read lots, think deeply, and most importantly find that area of research that really excites you!

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

Yes, but bizarrely it turned out to be one of my most enjoyable talks so far! In the last year of my PhD, I was attending the 2014 European Meeting of PhD Students in Evolutionary Biology (EMPSEB), which provides an amazing environment for early career researchers to network and present their research. In the middle of my talk, the computer and projector suddenly turned off. Clearly, this usually spells disaster for the remainder of the talk. Luckily, however, several people in the audience already had questions, so I spent the 5 minutes it took the organizers to fix the problem having a very lively and interesting discussion about my research. Thanks to those audience members for helping to save the day!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mallard duck and guineafowl eggs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Wright with a white leghorn chicken.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Wright presenting at Evoluton 2015 in Guaruja, Brazil.

View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Mary Caswell (Cassie) Stoddard
Assistant Professor
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Princeton University








Start Date: 2016
PhD: Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge; advisor: Prof. Rebecca Kilner
Postdoc: Junior Fellow in the Harvard Society of Fellows

About the department:

I am an Assistant Professor at Princeton University in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton is an exciting place to be a biologist because so much high-powered scientific research happens on a relatively compact campus. This makes it possible to create and maintain interdisciplinary collaborations. The EEB Department is particularly dynamic, and I feel fortunate to work with great colleagues and students.

About the research:

In my lab, we explore key questions in evolution, behavior and sensory ecology, with a focus on avian vision and coloration as well as on the development and structure of avian eggs. How do birds perceive color? Why do eggs come in different shapes? Do cuckoos mimic the patterns of host eggs? How do eggshells break? To answer these questions, we apply techniques from math, optics, computer vision and bioengineering. Our current work takes us to the collections of the American Museum of Natural History (NYC) and to the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, where we are investigating hummingbird color perception.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

In the last year, my lab has grown to include several postdocs, graduate students and a research technician. It was difficult to predict how this new group would mesh – in terms of personalities, scientific backgrounds and work habits. Perhaps the most rewarding part of this year – and the best surprise – has been watching my lab members grow into a cohesive and collaborative unit. To be a part of that group energy and creativity as the PI is exhilarating.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

To me, what stands out about the SSE is its enthusiastic support of young evolutionary biologists – in the form of travel awards and research grants for undergraduates, graduate students and postdocs. This kind of support is essential, and the SSE has made it a top priority. I was extremely honored to be awarded the Dobzhansky Prize, another mechanism by which the SSE endorses the work of early-career researchers.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters ? As an undergraduate, I remember flipping through the hard-copy issues of Evolution in the reading area outside my advisor’s office. It would be a few years before I submitted something to Evolution myself, an article on cuckoo egg color mimicry. I spent hours designing a potential image for the cover, a series of cuckoo eggs ranging from excellent to poor forgeries. When it was selected, I was thrilled. I still have a copy of that issue in my office.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

Much of my research has been based at natural history museums, which provide a wonderful forum for public outreach. My most memorable experiences were working with the Young Zoologists Club at the University of Cambridge Museum of Zoology and teaming up with an artist at the Harvard Museum of Natural History to teach a course on the art and science of bird feather color. Now that we are conducting research at the American Museum of Natural History, we look forward to getting more involved with the museum’s education and outreach efforts. Some of our research was recently highlighted in the museum’s Dinosaurs Among Us exhibit.

Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

I teach a sensory ecology and evolution class for undergrads. The most mind-bending concept for students? The idea that many animals have sensory experiences outside our own – like ultraviolet vision, echolocation, magnetoreception – and that this completely shapes animal behavior and evolution. And the fact that mantis shrimp have so many different color cones in their eyes, which admittedly blows my mind, too.

Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

I am a big fan of Science Podcast and the work of science writer Ed Yong.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

My advice would be to start on a small project, so that you can get your feet wet – collecting and analyzing data, engaging with the literature, coming up with new ideas, writing a first draft. Don’t feel like you have to have your whole PhD mapped out from the start – that will fall into place eventually.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I like birding (naturally) and occasionally I dust off my violin. I played in a Celtic fiddle band in grad school.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A male Broad-tailed Hummingbird. Photo by M. C. Stoddard.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Stoddard's field site in the Rocky Mountains. Photo by M. C. Stoddard.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Stoddard in an egg collection. Photo by Denise Applewhite, Princeton University.

View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Michael White
Assistant Professor
Department of Genetics
University of Georgia
http://www.genetics.uga.edu/directory/michael-white

 

 

 

Start date: August 2015
Ph.D: Department of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison; advisor: Dr. Bret Payseur
Postdoc: Divisions of Human Biology and Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; advisor: Dr. Katie Peichel



About the department:

I am an Assistant Professor in the Genetics Department at the University of Georgia, located in beautiful Athens, Georgia. Our department is a highly collaborative environment, with a strong mix of both molecular and evolutionary genetics research. As a new professor, our department has been especially welcoming. We have a large group of junior faculty who have been instrumental in helping me navigate the early days as a new professor.

About the research program:

Research in my lab primarily focuses on the evolution of sex chromosomes. We use the threespine stickleback fish as a model system to understand the evolution of young XY sex chromosomes. One key step in evolving new sex chromosomes is the loss of recombination between the homologs. Within a single Y chromosome, recombination rates vary tremendously. In some regions, rates are several fold higher than genome-wide averages, whereas elsewhere along the chromosome, recombination is completely suppressed. I am interested in the evolutionary consequences of the loss of recombination on sex chromosomes as well as the mechanisms that can cause such varied rates in recombination.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Some of my biggest challenges as a new PI have involved tasks not directly related to research. Interpreting and managing lab budgets, ordering supplies, requesting repair work, and hiring new employees all have had a higher learning curve than I was anticipating. I have been surprised how much time these tasks can actually consume.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

Every new member in my lab so far has required a different mentoring style. After I discovered this, I realized my general approach to mentoring new members is to start with a clean slate. Then I spend the first month or two figuring out the best way to mentor that particular member to help their projects move along as efficiently as possible.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

I am recruiting new lab members. I recruit graduate students through the Integrated Life Sciences graduate program here at UGA. The program allows students to choose three rotation labs from faculty in over a dozen departments and institutes. The rotation system has been useful for me as a new PI to see if students are a good fit for my lab.

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I became an SSE member immediately after I began my Ph.D. and I attended my first Evolution Meeting in Minneapolis, MN in 2008. This was the first society I had been a member of that had a primary focus on evolution research. As a student, I was drawn to this society because of the opportunity to give a talk as an early graduate student. I found these early presentations incredibly useful in learning how to communicate research clearly.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

I teach evolution at an undergraduate level in a section of introductory biology as well at a graduate level in a genetics course. Both classes share similar challenging concepts. For one, students have a hard time interpreting phylogenies. I spend a lot of time teaching students how to interpret phylogenetic trees, rather than focusing on the nitty-gritty details of constructing phylogenies. I also find genetic drift to be a difficult concept for students. I think randomness in evolution is a foreign idea for many students.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

If I had to give one piece of advice, I would tell graduate students that in addition to the research, I think it is important to spend time cultivating a good group of friends outside of the lab. A Ph.D. is a long haul and that support network is essential in getting you through your program.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

I made lots of mistakes as a trainee. This is expected as a trainee! I think the key to making mistakes is learning from them and taking responsibility by reporting your mistakes. I believe many of my mistakes over the years have in some way stemmed from errors in organizing. This is a skill I am still refining.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

Lately I have been spending free time working outside in our garden. I have discovered that weeding is very relaxing! In my free time I try to stick to activities that do not require a tremendous amount of thinking.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Martha Muñoz
Assistant ProfessorDepartment of Biological Sciences
Virginia Tech
https://www.munozlab.biol.vt.edu
Twitter: @Marmmunoz, @MunozLabVT

 

 

 

 

Start date: August 2017
PhD: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard university; advisor: Dr. Jonathan Losos
Postdoc: Division of Ecology and Evolution, The Australian National University; advisor: Dr. Craig Moritz
Postdoc: Department of Biology, Duke University; advisor: Dr. Sheila Patek


About the department:

What drew me most to Virginia Tech was the collegiality and sense of community in the Department. The Department puts special emphasis on helping junior faculty, and I feel very supported. Additionally, the academic community was very appealing. We have paleontologists, ecologists, and evolutionary biologists of various backgrounds, leading to a rich and intellectually diverse community of peers. Living in the Appalachian Mountains is also a huge plus!

About the research program:

My primary goal is to answer one of the most enduring puzzles in evolutionary biology: Why does evolution proceed unequally? The uneven tempo of phenotypic evolution is a universal feature of biological systems, leading some features and lineages to be highly diverse and others almost unchanged over millions of years. I seek to discover the motors and brakes underlying diversification, and reveal their footprints across distinct phylogenetic scales. I lead an integrative program, and weave together behavioral ecology, physiology, biomechanics, environmental modeling, and comparative methods. This range of approaches and systems, however, are all firmly rooted in revealing the key pacemakers for evolution.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Building my research program has been an exciting challenge! In addition to my research on lizards, I am expanding the lab to study evolutionary physiology and ecology of Appalachian salamanders. Establishing a new line of research has been challenging, but I am definitely thrilled to add a new study system to the lab’s research program. Additionally, I’m starting new collaborations for studies of evolutionary biomechanics, and getting projects off the ground requires dedication and hard work. It’s all incredibly rewarding, though, and completely worth it.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

Before becoming a faculty member, I did not realize how many new responsibilities I would take on. In some regards, this was a bit overwhelming because many of these challenges – like mentoring grad students and teaching a large undergraduate class – were entirely new to me. But, with new challenges comes a new opportunity to grow. I’ve found the challenge to be very exciting and rewarding.

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution meeting?

My roommate from the first Evolution meeting I attended turned out to be a former National Spelling Bee champ!

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

I attended my first Evolution meeting in 2006, while I was an undergraduate at Boston University. At that point in my career, I knew that I wanted to become a scientist, but I wasn’t really sure how to accomplish that goal. Luckily, I had an amazing mentor (Dr. Paul Barber), who encouraged me to present the research I had conducted in his lab at the Evolution meeting. I attended the 2006 meeting in Stony Brook, NY and experienced a professional conference for the first time. The experience was transformative! I was completely immersed in scientific talks and meeting actual scientists, many of whom were my age. I felt like I had discovered my community. I should also mention that I attended that meeting under the auspices of an undergraduate grant through Dr. Scott Edward’s diversity program. That made the meeting affordable for me, and also made me feel very welcomed.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters?

Of course I remember my first publication in Evolution, as it’s one of my favorite papers! I had been studying the evolutionary physiology of rainforest skinks from Australia with Dr. Craig Moritz and other colleagues down under. The skinks in question come from the Australian Wet Tropics, a tiny little sliver of land that harbors a disproportionate number of the continent’s biodiversity. What was remarkable was that closely related skink species differed dramatically in their heat tolerance, with some species being substantially more heat tolerant than others. Even more remarkably, these different types of thermal specialists are found in sympatry. How can two species with divergent physiologies co-exist in the same habitat? They do so by behaviorally partitioning the habitat. When it’s sunny out, only the heat tolerant species are out. When it gets cloudy, the more cool adapted species emerge. Shifts to “basking” or “shade seeking” behaviors occurred many times throughout their evolutionary history, and every shift was predictably accompanied by a change in heat tolerance.

Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

I just taught my first undergraduate course in Evolution this past spring. Every little bit of this class was a total blast. Two topics really stand out as mind blowing for the students. The first is the fossil record. Most of them hadn’t ever really learned about the incredible stories we’ve uncovered from rocks. I can remember their faces lighting up when they learned that whales evolved from cursorial artiodactyls or about Tiktaalik and the evolution of tetrapods. Another topic that really blew their minds was evo-devo, about how incredible biological complexity can actually derive from very simple changes to Hox genes.

I chose to study evolution because it triggers my wonder reflex. I love that I get to share my enthusiasm for evolution with students, and that I get to experience their surprise and excitement. I still share the same wonderment as my undergraduates.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

This may sound strange, but what has worked best for my time management skills has been to work on achieving better work-life balance. By carving out personal time for all the other things I like to do with my life, I have become better at maximizing my time when I am working. In other words, making room for balance in my life has helped me become more efficient when I am working. Then, when big deadlines or other major events require a bit more of my time, I am better able to handle it. I learned this technique while I was a postdoc in Dr. Sheila Patek’s lab. She really supported work-life balance, and part of that included being as focused and efficient as possible while at work.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

This is going to perhaps sound like odd advice, but I would tell them to get comfortable with “failure”. By this I mean that grad school involves learning and growing and trial and error. Things not quite working out is simply part of the process. I spent a lot of time in grad school too worried about “failing” that I ended up getting stressed and too afraid to think big or take big risks. I eventually found my stride, but it took a lot of learning, stumbling and experience. I see this now in many graduate students. There is so much pressure to “succeed” that it’s easy to get wrapped up in never having anything fail. Grad school is about learning to ask good questions and how to pursue those questions. All of us “fail” along the way – it’s part of learning. Things got easier for me when I got more confident in my own abilities and more comfortable with how scientific research goes.

One more piece of advice (and this one is important): Be kind to each other. Academia and grad school can be tough environments. We deal with lots of rejection and with competitive funding and publishing environments. It’s much easier when we support each other and treat each other with understanding and kindness. My happiest times in grad school were always when I was surrounded by support, friendship, and kindness. Not surprisingly, I also did my best work under those circumstances.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

If you’re interested in getting a tenure track job, talk a lot to people who have just succeeded at that task. I spoke often with colleagues, and looked at their application materials to get a broader understanding of what got folks employed. From my experience on the job market, I would say that having the confidence to self-advocate helped me a lot. But, everyone’s experience is different, and learning as much as you can is helpful.

How was your first faculty meeting?

My first faculty meeting was surprisingly uneventful! For some reason, I had pictured in my mind that faculty meetings involved intense debate over departmental issues. That is not the case.

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

Yes! Horribly wrong. I was giving a talk at the annual meeting for the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology when I was a first-year graduate student and, halfway through my talk, I realized that some of the photos in my slides had been randomly replaced with other photos from the same album on my computer. What was supposed to be a photo of a lush rainforest was transformed into a photo of my colleague holding a vine snake. It turned out that the same colleague was in the audience, and everyone started laughing. And that’s when I learned to double and triple check file uploads before giving a talk!

What is something most people don’t know about you?

One thing most people don’t know is that I am a huge Mets fan. Most of those who do know have given me endless grief about it, including my PhD advisor who for some reason prefers the Cardinals.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I recently became an aunt for the first time. Spending time with my lovely little niece is a huge part of my life. Here in Blacksburg, I participate in a game night with some of my colleagues, which has been loads of fun. Beyond that, I love to go hiking and am learning to play the fiddle (poorly).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anolis armouri

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Claudia Bank
Principal Investigator
Evolutionary Dynamics Group
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia
Oeiras, Portugal
https://evoldynamics.org/

 

Start date: January 2016
PhD: University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, Austria; advisors: Prof. Joachim Hermisson and Prof. Christian Schlötterer
Postdoc: Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne; advisor: Prof. Jeffrey Jensen


About the department:

The Gulbenkian Institute is a private research institution with ~36 research groups (with almost 50% female group leaders!) near Lisbon, in Portugal. I hold a 5-year group leader position there. The Gulbenkian Institute stands out by its interdisciplinary and open atmosphere, fostered by small groups, shared lab space, and no department structure (and a patio where everyone meets for lunch and coffee).

About the research program:

We study how populations adapt and diversify, with a specific interest in the role of epistasis during these processes. We use mathematical modeling to develop predictions, which we evaluate using experimental data, often obtained from the labs of a handful of great collaborators. Although we are mainly a dry lab, some lab members combine experimental and theoretical work. Here are some typical questions we address: How does the shape of a fitness landscape change along an environmental gradient? Can we predict the costs of antibiotic resistance across environments? What are the roles of local adaptation and epistasis during speciation?

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Being 2.5 years into having my own lab, currently my biggest challenge is to avoid stalling my lab members' progress. With a multitude of tasks pressing at any time, the more challenging ones, like editing my lab members' manuscripts or helping them to solve a mathematical or computational problem, often become postponed in favor of the "easier"/quicker ones (e.g., administrative), those for the pushiest collaborators, or those with hard deadlines (e.g., grant writing). I think that I am slowly getting better at this by (1) becoming more practised at writing/editing during small time windows, by (2) embracing imperfection, both with respect to enforcing my favorite writing style and to staying on time with everything, and by (3) learning to say "no" more often.

How do you approach mentoring your lab members?

Having lab members is one of my greatest joys but also challenges (see also above) as a PI. It is wonderful to have people contribute their own ideas and expertise while working on my favorite subjects and questions, and it makes me particularly happy to see when they make progress independently and with the help of each other. However, I feel great responsibility to mentor my lab members according to their individual needs, and to be available for questions and problems. Inspired by one of my colleagues, I have recently introduced a yearly feedback meeting with each lab member, to which both of us bring a filled-in questionnaire about progress, future (career and research) plans, relationship with me and the rest of the lab, motivating factors, suggestions for improvement, etc. The first round of meetings has been very valuable for both sides and I am looking forward to going into round two at the end of this year. I also meet with each lab member individually on a semi-regular basis depending on their status (for example, two of my co-supervised PhD students do experimental work and there is no need for us to meet when they are in the middle of experiments), their preference, and my travel schedule.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

In fact this year's meeting in Montpellier will be my first Evolution meeting! I am very excited for the great list of symposia, and for meeting my friends and colleagues. In addition, there is already a long list of people I am planning to talk to in person for the first time. These opportunities are what I love about big summer conferences, whereas small meetings and workshops are better to meet new people "by chance" and to build your network in the first place.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

Yes! The very first paper of my scientific career was published in Evolution (Bank, C., Hermisson, J., & Kirkpatrick, M. (2012). Can reinforcement complete speciation? Evolution, 66(1), 229–239.), therefore the experience was particularly memorable for me.

Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

My institute is involved in various outreach activities, including a stand at a large music festival. My lab created an adaptation-themed board game that we first presented there and since at other instances. It consists of a (Lego) fitness landscape with different environments (colors) and fitness peaks, on which the players compete for reaching as high as possible. Before starting, players choose to walk across the landscape by either large-step, or small-step mutations, on top of which randomness is introduced by throwing a dice. Any time a higher level is reached, the player obtains a phenotype beneficial in the current environment (e.g., echolocation in the sea). At the end of the game, each player has to draw their own critter with the obtained phenotypes. It was a fun experience to develop the game together, and to see how people enjoyed playing it and how they started discussing the best adaptation strategies. Moreover, we got the most wonderful collection of drawings (see photos).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Stacy A. Krueger-Hadfield
Assistant Professor of Biology
Ray Lankester Investigator at the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (until June 2019)
Phycological Society of America Norma J. Lang Fellow (2018-2021)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB)
1300 University Blvd
Campbell Hall 464
Birmingham, AL 35294
Start date: July 2016

 

PhD: co-tutelle Université de Pierre et Marie Curie Sorbonne Universités (Diversité du Vivante) and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, advisors: Myriam Valero (SBR) and Juan Correa (PUC) (2008-2011)
Postdocs: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Plymouth, UK. Mentors: Declan Schroeder and John Bishop. (2011-2013)
Grice Marine Laboratory, College of Charleston, USA. Mentor: Erik Sotka. (2013-2016)


About the department:

UAB is an internationally renowned research university and academic medical center. The Biology Department is one of the oldest departments on campus and consists of ~25 full time faculty members, 50 graduate students, and 1,000 undergraduate majors. It’s perhaps surprising that a university in north-central Alabama has a contingent of marine and polar biologists, including, now, three marine phycologists!

About the research program:

The core of my research is centered on the evolution of sex. If an organism undergoes sexual reproduction, then it passes through a cycle of haploid and diploid stages. We tend to think of ‘normal’ as being a diploid (or diplontic) life cycle, like us. However, if you look across eukaryotes, there are many, many different ways of alternating between haploid and diploid stages. Yet, though there is theoretical support for this variation, namely the evolutionary stability of haplodiplontic life cycles, we do not have a great deal of empirical work on these predictions. We focus on algal and invertebrate models with which we study the mechanisms that underlie the maintenance of life cycle and mating system variation. We can be found anywhere from making natural history observations to utilizing –omics approaches, and anywhere in between, to test hypotheses on the evolution of sex.

Being a New Faculty Member

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Time management. I was fortunate that during my first year at UAB, I had a reduced teaching load. This let me focus on getting my lab renovated and up and running. But, my third semester as a new PI, I was a bit too ambitious. I was teaching a cross-listed undergraduate/graduate evolution course (my first proper lecture), mentoring undergrads and a new post-doc, doing some large scale field work on both coasts of the US, organizing Darwin Day, writing two large grants, and running a large phenotyping experiment. I was stretched a bit too thin, but as time wore on during the semester, I started to become more proficient at being efficient. There were (and are) starts and stops of course, but I try to carve out some ‘down time,’ thus, making work time (on whatever task) more efficient. I’m still learning how to balance all my new responsibilities with my personal life, but it is getting easier.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

The freedom. While time management (and learning to say ‘no’) has been a struggle and a constant learning curve, deciding what I want to do when, where, and how is pretty amazing. I guess this really isn’t a surprise, but I admit I have really enjoyed deciding what I want to do when, where, and how, and then doing it! I also admit to walking into my lab sometimes and just looking around with a contented sigh.

I guess one other surprising thing is being treated differently by students. I had a large amount of field work in September 2017, and at the last minute, I realized I hadn’t exchanged cell phone numbers with the PhD student I was about to meet in an airport for the first time. I sent him my number so we could find each other. He later told me that he didn’t feel he could ask for a professor’s personal cell phone number. It never occurred to me that someone wouldn’t ask for my cell phone number just because I was now a professor!

How have you prepared to be a PI?

I have watched, listened, and learned. I’ve asked a lot of advice from a lot of different people anywhere along the academic career trajectory. I’ve not been shy about seeking their opinions. Some of the advice, I discarded, and for some of that discarded advice, wish I hadn’t. Other advice, I implemented and am grateful. UAB is really supportive of new faculty. I have a faculty mentor with whom I meet once per week. He is a font of knowledge and advice that has been incredibly helpful and made this transition to principal investigator much easier than it would have otherwise been. I sincerely hope that I am able to emulate my faculty mentor one day to another new faculty member.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

I have had some really fantastic experiences. I’ve also been in situations that were less than noteworthy and ones I’d never want to happen in my lab. I also know what has worked for me, and what doesn’t work for me. I am trying to give students and post-docs in my lab the latitude to figure that out a bit for themselves. If work is getting done, then I haven’t been too bothered about trying to fit everyone in the same mold (i.e., working 9-5). I’m still learning how to mentor effectively, but I feel that being a supportive presence and coming to their aid when they falter has worked so far. I think the first few people through my lab will learn with me as we move along.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

Yes, I am slowly building my lab as I feel really strongly about my lab’s philosophy. I think it is important to get the right personalities working together so the lab has a culture that continues as it matures. I have been lucky enough to work with some fantastic international teams and labs and want my lab to reflect the same ethos that was core to those good working relationships. Some of the other new PI’s highlighted by SSE have spoken of kindness, and I second that. Kindness and honesty go a really long way. It makes collaboration and work fun, even when it is stressful. For undergrads, I ask them to come work in the lab and get to know us (and us them) for a semester. So far, we’ve done a few paper discussions with the interested undergrad which doesn’t require a huge time commitment from either party. Then, if they are still interested, we commit to something more formal, either paid or through course credit. For grad students (both MS and PhD), I request students contact me with their CV and a brief proposal of how they see their research fitting into my lab, UAB’s graduate program, and evolutionary ecology more broadly. I become sincerely interested in an articulate student that is persistent, coming to me with ideas. I try to email everyone who emails me back, even the budding marine biologists that want to work in my lab and study dolphins (we don’t study cetaceans!). If a grad student is serious, then, I invite them out to Birmingham to see the campus and get to know my lab and their future fellow grad students and other lab/department members. I have not advertised any PhD or post-doc positions yet, but I think fit is a really important component. Fit is a two-way street. I first let interested lab members know what they can expect of me, then what I expect of them. Everything is clear at the outset. I’m hoping this lets us keep the dynamic, positive, kind atmosphere that the lab has going indefinitely.

SSE Membership

When and why did you become a SSE member? / What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

I had been a member of ESEB when I was a student in Europe. However, I didn’t become a member of SSE until 2016 when I attended my first Evolution meeting. Since joining, I have been lucky enough to receive a Small Grant for Local and Regional Outreach Promoting the Understanding of Evolutionary Biology. I’ve also made many new contacts in the field of evolutionary biology that I might not otherwise have had the opportunity to initiate.

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

I don’t know if this is funny, but at the meeting in Portland in 2017, I was pretty excited to have been invited to give a talk in a session on mating systems (I get really excited about mating systems). Due to other field work and meetings, I hadn’t planned on attending the Portland meeting, but after the invitation, I combined Evolution with some opportunistic field work. My parents flew up and met me to drive out to the Washington coast. We had a microscope, an herbarium press, and other odds and ends in a minivan. Overnight, near the convention center and in a supposedly secure hotel parking lot, some charming fellow decided to relieve us of our possessions. All caught on CCTV, but, alas, nothing to do. After the anger subsided, we could just barely see the humor in the situation. I have imagined the guy cracking open the Pelican case and seeing the Leica EZ4. I imagine him bitterly disappointed that he committed a felony for a classroom ‘scope, pressed seaweed, and used Falcon tubes.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

I had been a member of ESEB and attended ESEB meetings as I was a PhD student in Europe, but only attended my first Evolution Meeting in Texas in 2016. I gave a talk about work we’d done on mating system variation during an invasion of a red seaweed. I noticed this general audience was nodding along with me, even though I was talking about haplodiplontic life cycles! It was the first time I’d given a talk at a non-phycological meeting that I’d gotten that kind of reception. I rode that high all the way to UAB a few weeks later!

Besides research, how do you promote science?

Since 2014, I have been fortunate enough to be a contributor to the blog The Molecular Ecologist (TME) (http://www.molecularecologist.com). It has changed how I approach my research and disseminating results. I have also written for other society newsletters and publications. As a new PI at UAB, my colleagues supported me developing a Science Communication course. The course has been successful so far. Past Sci Comm students have won presentation awards at conferences and society grants in aid of research. However, my #NewPI commitments have severely limited my TME writing.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

Yes, I was hired as an evolutionary biologist, though I see myself as an evolutionary ecologist. I teach a cross-listed course on evolution for junior/senior undergraduates, undergraduate capstone students, MS students, and PhD students. This is a challenging course to teach as there are essentially four types of enrolled students. How do I keep it interesting for the PhD students, but not too advanced for the undergrads? How do I effectively incorporate active learning? In general, I find the students really struggle with phylogenies and Hardy Weinberg. I’ve adapted the course to have many more hands-on activities with these two components than any other in the course. I implemented these changes this past spring, and scores were much higher on assessments and exams!

Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

Phylogenetics. Once they get it, they are a bit in awe. We talk about cetacean evolution and then viral evolution in the same lecture … the time scales that produce trees that look similar, until they realize the difference in time (millions of years vs. several months) always blows their minds.

Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

Yes, along with two grad students at UAB, we were awarded a Small Grant for Local and Regional Outreach Promoting the Understanding of Evolutionary Biology. We are going to go to the Cahaba River and teach people about the evolutionary ecology of freshwater ecosystems. My lab is starting to work on freshwater red algae, in collaboration with Morgan Vis at Ohio University, and this will be an excellent way for us to branch out of the marine realm, and teach people about the freshwater diversity in their own backyard.

In addition, I have been a contributor to The Molecular Ecologist since 2014. I have been able to write about anything and everything during this time! I have also been fortunate enough to use my position as a contributor to help my Sci Comm students publish blog posts on TME.

Tips and Advice

Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

This is a totally biased opinion, but The Molecular Ecologist. I love reading my fellow contributors’ posts!

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

“Size and Cycle: an essay on the structure of biology” by John Tyler Bonner – this is a definite must-read for every biologist, let alone every evolutionary biologist. I admit I only read this recently, but it changed my view point. Bonner takes the view that the life cycle is the central unit of biology. As such, evolution becomes the alternation of life cycles through time. Genetics is, then, the inheritance mechanism between cycles (I take the liberty of saying mating systems here as well). Finally, development is the series of changes in structure that take place during one life cycle.

“Plant Speciation” by Verne Grant – this is a bit more of a book I think every phycologist should read. I hope that evolutionary ecology will become more mainstream in phycology. Mike Guiry recommended I read this book about plant speciation in the context of seaweed speciation, and it has been eye opening.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Take time to stop and look around. Take time to take it all in because as trite and cliché as it is to say, it all disappears so quickly. I think one of the dirty little secrets of academia is that just about the time you get really good at conducting research, you get a job that includes managing people (and their emotions), writing grant after grant after grant, teaching, and a myriad of other service activities. Don’t get me wrong, I have no doubt that I have the best job in the world. But, my biggest regret from my PhD is being so focused on getting 5 publishable units, that I didn’t fully enjoy being in France (thanks to a comment made by a professor at my graduation as I left to begin my PhD … if I didn’t have 5 publishable units from my European PhD, I’d be hard-pressed to land a post-doc let alone a job in the US. Helpful advice, but at the time I accepted my position at UAB, I only had 3 publications from my European PhD). Don’t get me wrong, I saw a lot and experienced some pretty amazing things, but I wish I’d stopped a little bit more, taken a deep breath, and looked around. So, stop and take a deep breath. Then, look around.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Probably similar to a starting graduate student. There is not a ‘one size fits all’ academic career. My CV wasn’t what I was told I would need to get a job, or a job at an R1. I have focused on doing good work, and publishing in my society journals. This hasn’t led me astray. I’ve listened to my gut and then hoped for the best. I knew at the end of the day, that if this didn’t work out, at least I’d be happy with myself and my accomplishments.

Outside the lab

How was your first faculty meeting?

I got there with maybe 5 minutes to spare and was the first one. I sat in the middle thinking people would fill in the front, but alas I was at the front. The chair called on me for something I can’t remember now and I felt like I was the new kid in the 6th grade all over again.

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

I gave an invited symposium talk last year at the International Phycological Congress in Sczezcin, Poland. It was August and hot, so the windows were opened in the classrooms where the sessions were held. During my 20-minute slot, a dump truck was collecting refuse from the dumpsters outside. It was loud and continued along all 5 dumpsters (as least I think there were 5) along the alleyway behind the building.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I like to be at home. Since arriving at UAB, I have traveled a lot for conferences, seminars, and field work. Thus, right now in my free time, I like to be at home doing anything from reading to staring out into the yard on a lazy afternoon.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chondrus, a red seaweed studied in the Krueger-Hadfield lab.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Krueger-Hadfield teaching about seaweeds.

View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Emily Kane
Assistant Professor of Biology
Georgia Southern University
Statesboro, GA
www.thekanelab.com
Start date: January 2017

Master's: Texas A&M University; advisor: Chris Marshall
PhD: University of California, Riverside; advisor: Tim Higham
Postdoc: Colorado State University; advisor: Cameron Ghalambor

About the department:

GSU is a public, 4-year, doctoral research university and is the largest public institution in southeast Georgia with almost 30,000 students. GSU is predominantly an undergraduate institution that values innovative teaching and productive research programs. In Biology, we work closely with undergraduate and Master’s students to integrate research and teaching and provide students with unique opportunities to develop their interests.

About the research:

I refer to my lab’s work as “Ecological and Evolutionary Biomechanics”. Our questions center around how animals survive and adapt to their environment, especially when they have to integrate multiple functional systems to do so. For example, how does specialization for swimming behavior affect the ability to integrate swimming with feeding during prey capture in fishes? We have worked mostly with Trinidadian guppies, but are also starting projects with local sunfishes.

On being a new faculty member:

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI?

The biggest challenge has been ensuring that I continue to make progress in all areas while assuming new roles and responsibilities that I didn’t necessarily train for. There is a significant learning curve when starting any new position, but as a new assistant professor there have been so many new things all at once, and so many new things for which I am now the one responsible. I started in January of my first year, which in some ways made me feel I was behind. I had to start recruiting graduate students before I even had the lab set up and had to spend my first year’s startup by the end of that May. For anyone interested in what it was like, I wrote a blog post about my first semester. This helped me realize exactly how much I had accomplished in one semester, even though I still felt behind on several things. I have had tremendous support from my department, colleagues, and family, who were invaluable in getting through these challenges. Some parts have been getting easier since then, but there are always new challenges as you become more experienced with the old ones. For example, I was hired to develop a new course on Biomechanics which I will teach for the first time this fall semester.

What advice would you give to a new PI?

No matter how much you think you have prepared to lead your own lab, the first few years will be challenging. It is important to find people in the department who can provide resources, offer solutions to things you’re struggling with, remind you why they chose you and why you’re valuable to them, and support you when you need an extra hand. Also, consider how much work it will be to start new research projects; even if you are experienced with the study system, animal care, equipment, etc., chances are you will require new permits and approvals, there might be constraints on space or other resources, you will have to train personnel, you may have newer versions of the equipment that require you to learn it again (including operating systems), or you may be purchasing equipment you know how to use *in theory* but have never done the process yourself and you realize part-way through that you didn’t purchase critical items.

My approach has been to start a big, expensive project early, while I have money, since funding can be challenging for basic science questions. However, this means that at any given time there have been around 10 undergraduates in the lab and now 2 graduate students. Since we don’t have PhD students and it’s rare to have postdocs or lab technicians, that means I am heavily involved in ensuring that everyone’s time is being used in a way that helps them achieve their goals as well as mine. I was actually recommended not to start with a big lab, but a series of situations and quick decisions meant this was the way we would go. I cannot thank my students enough for how team-oriented, dedicated, and patient they have been, and the lab would not be where it is now without their hard work! We’re starting to see some interesting results from this project and I can’t wait to bring them to the Evolution conference next summer!

Are you recruiting? What do you look for in students?

Yes, I am always looking for motivated students to join my lab! I am looking for students who are interested in how parts of an animal work together and what that means for survival and evolution. I understand that potential students won’t have everything figured out and that’s why they need my help. Therefore, I don’t expect that students will know exactly what they want to study when they contact me, but I do expect that they can tell me why they are interested in this idea and working with me. I like to give Master’s students a “starter” project to get them going their first year. If there wasn’t something specific I recruited the student to work on and it’s in the student’s best interest, I may also allow them to develop their own ideas for a second project. In addition to research, I am also looking for students who have an interest in science education and outreach and can help grow the lab’s impact in this area. Not only do I think it’s important to develop significant research questions, but it’s equally important to be able to convey those ideas to broader audiences. This is an increasingly important skill for students to have experience with given the diversity of job opportunities available to them after their degree.

On SSE membership:

When and why did you become a SSE member?

As a graduate student, I considered myself more of a biomechanist and the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology meetings were my go-to meetings, especially since it was difficult to afford more than one per year. However, when I began to think about my interests beyond my PhD, I knew I wanted to learn more about evolutionary biology because I saw a need for understanding how mechanical traits evolve and how they may impose constraints on other traits. I targeted Cameron’s lab as one where I could integrate these ideas while also building on my understanding of evolutionary processes and mechanisms. I joined SSE and attended my first meeting in 2016 in Austin, TX. This had been my goal for some time, and I finally had a project and some new data I thought would fit. I also wanted to present our outreach work to get feedback and help share our work for others to use. I had a blast at that meeting! I was able to catch up with friends that I don’t see at other conferences, see talks and hear about ideas I wouldn’t see at other conferences, and meet people that work outside of my main study area, including guppy researchers that work on different questions. Since then, I have been impressed with the society’s commitment to diversity and early career researchers, and I look forward to continued involvement in the future. I intend to continue attending Evolution meetings as often as I can!

Have any members of SSE inspired you in your career?

Neither of them probably remember this, but I met both Hopi Hoekstra and Judith Bronstein early in my time as a PhD student. They were both invited for a seminar by the graduate students while I was at Clemson University (Hopi) and UC Riverside (Judith). I went to a graduate student lunch with Hopi and I remember how amazed I was with her research and how inspired I was to see a female evolutionary biologist who had such an impact on her field. I remember thinking it might be possible for me too. It was also refreshing talking to someone so “famous” who really just wanted to chat with some graduate students about science. When Judith came to UC Riverside I volunteered to take her to the airport at the end of her visit. I was intimidated at first because again she was so “famous” and this was an hour drive, but it quickly became apparent that my concern was unfounded. She asked me about my work and gave me advice on things I was struggling with. I asked her some questions about publishing and she told me that she loves working with students because she likes to find the hidden gems. This stood out because reviewing seemed to be so critical that it’s often perceived as negative. I was so inspired by this conversation and I became convicted to take this same approach in lab meetings, grading student papers, and manuscript reviews. Of course, there are other role models I’ve met over the years as well, but Hopi and Judith stand out because they left such a positive impact so early in my career.

On life outside the lab:

Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

I taught upper level Evolution for the first time this past spring. All Biology students take a sophomore level class to cover the basics of Evolution as well as the diversity of life, so most of them came in with a fair amount of knowledge. But I remember in one class I casually mentioned as an example how we are all fish, technically. I kept explaining the original concept and a few minutes later a student raised her hand and said “Wait, go back. I’m a fish?!” I thought that given the previous class this may have been a familiar concept but it made me realize how these kinds of connections may not be obvious to students, even when they understand phylogenetic trees and the evolutionary process. I also realized I glossed over one of the coolest evolutionary stories! So we spent some extra time discussing Neil Shubin’s Your Inner Fish and I realize now that I shouldn’t expect that students know what I’m talking about.

Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

As part of my postdoc at Colorado State University I became involved in a collaborative project to use authentic science with live guppies to supplement evolution education in local middle schools. A (then) graduate student, Dale Broder, worked with my advisor as well as local teachers to develop a program that would connect scientists with local schools to help students learn about evolution by discovering it for themselves. My role was to help turn this program into something more sustainable, since researchers can’t always be present in classrooms. I developed collaborations with the CSU Education and Outreach Center, who use kit designs to supplement STEM education. They helped us turn the 5-day program into a 1.5-hour kit. It took Dale several years to develop the original program, perform assessments, and publish her work. It took us a year to design and build the kits and about another year to test the kits and get feedback from teachers and colleagues. It took us one more year to get the guppy kit program published in American Biology Teacher. The goal of this publication was to provide all the materials and information necessary for educators to adapt the program to their own classrooms.

During my time at Georgia Southern, I have been working with Amanda Glaze (Department of Teaching and Learning) and Kania Greer (Institute for Interdisciplinary STEM Education) to build and use a set of kits here in South Georgia. To read more about these kits, see my website and my blog post about our publication. This is my most well-developed effort, but I am always looking for ways to engage the community in thinking about evolution. For example, my evolution students completed science communication projects and explained their topics to the public (including non-majors students) in the biology building foyer last spring.

Tips and Advice

Do you have a time management tip to share?

When I’m really struggling with time management, like in the middle of the semester, I use a list-making technique that helps me plan my time and ensure I can make steady progress. I start by making a list of all the things I want to accomplish by the end of the semester - reasonable things, not “publish 6 papers” but rather “submit conference abstract”. I then assign each task to a month I want to (or need to) accomplish them. Then I break them down further and plan tasks for each week to help me meet that goal - for example “finish analyzing data”, “backup videos”, “write abstract draft”, and “abstract revisions”. You could probably guess, then, that the next step is assigning those tasks, or parts of them, to days of the week - for example “double check data accuracy”, “run basic stats on data”, “run specific stats on data”, “make figures”. This list system may sound excessive, but I find that it helps me prioritize certain things each day and helps me plan ahead to complete tasks even when I have teaching, meetings, or other commitments interspersed. When I finish a thing, I can save time and move on to the next one rather than wonder what I should work on next, stress about not having enough time to do all the things, choose something easy that isn’t necessary yet, and waste time tackling my list inefficiently.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I did a Semester at Sea in college where we sailed a 125’ schooner from St. Thomas, down to Tobago, back up through the Dominican Republic and up the eastern US to New York. Our families met us in Greenport, Long Island on the final day, so we spent the day before cleaning the ship. I was helping a deckhand in a small inflatable scrubbing the hull. It was choppy so some of the crew onboard threw a line over the side for us to hold onto. However, when the deckhand lost her balance and grabbed it, we discovered it was loose and she started to fall in. I tried to catch her and somehow she stayed in the boat and I did not. I was the only student to fall overboard on that trip and I did it on the last day. It was so cold that I was wearing several layers and all of them were soaked, leaving me few options to stay warm the following day as we came into port. Luckily, I didn’t have to wait long to re-acquire warm, dry clothes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

David L. Des Marais
Assistant Professor
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, MA
http://desmarais-lab.mit.edu
Start date: October 2017
PhD: Department of Biology, Duke University (2008); advisor: Mark Rausher
Post-doc: Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin (2008-2013); advisor: Tom Juenger
Research Scientist: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, and The Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University (2014-2017)
Photo by Lili Paquette, MIT School of Engineering.

About the department:

I’m in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at MIT. This is an amazing, but unusual, department! Our faculty spans microbiology, hydrology, environmental chemistry, networks, materials, architecture, structural engineering, and now, plant evolution and physiology. I interact most closely with the environmental scientists and engineers, and I’ve been amazed at our common interests spanning traditional disciplinary boundaries.

About the research:

Our group is generally interested in how the physical environment impacts the evolution and ecology of natural plant populations. Plants integrate a spectacular amount of environmental data on time scales bridging minutes to seasons to decades. In the case of plant-environment interaction, we often lack an understanding of how genetic variants translate to physiological differences, and so much of our work addresses these functional linkages. Presently, we are asking how the topology and function of gene regulatory networks affect the evolution of environmental response, as well as how patterns of nutrient and biomass allocation evolve during life history transitions.

Being a new faculty member:

During my first few months at MIT I felt like a kid in a candy shop. First, there’s the excitement of filling a lab with equipment and imagining all of the discoveries that might emerge from our new toys. Second, MIT is a very collaborative, interdisciplinary, question-driven university filled with brilliant problem solvers. In my first three months I wrote grant proposals with faculty in five different departments; the opportunities for exploring living systems from unique perspectives feels boundless here. There were challenges, too. Recruiting and retaining productive lab members is hard, and of course we all want to be good mentors but at times I didn’t know how best to accomplish that.

On SSE membership:

I honestly can’t recall when I became an SSE member, sometime in graduate school I imagine, though I vividly remember my first Evolution Meeting, in Fort Collins, CO in 2004. At previous professional meetings I’d felt very intimidated and out of place. By contrast, Evolution felt like it was attended by 1000 friends and colleagues that I just hadn’t met yet! The talks were approachable yet thought-provoking, the topics seemed to cover everything I’d ever found interesting, the vibe was inviting to young scientists, and the senior faculty actually came to our posters and asked useful and challenging questions. I’ve been a regular attendee ever since!!

Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

For the past four years, I’ve been fortunate to have a great public platform through my affiliations with The Arnold Arboretum and Harvard’s Natural History Museums. Both the Arboretum and HMNH have established very successful public programs through which I’ve given workshops to local teachers, garden clubs, and members of the general public on plant evolution, diversity, physiology, and agriculture. I’m continually inspired by the interest and excitement from participants in these sessions, many of whom haven’t had any formal scientific education past high school. You’d be amazed what nuggets of botanical insights people gain over years of gardening! I’ve also found that distilling down complex topics like photosynthesis, selective sweeps, or local adaptation for a general audience is a really fun and interesting challenge.

Tips and Advice

My advice to aspiring scientists in any field is to find balance. Balance between doing science and being a family member, friend, and citizen. Balance between working on current projects and planning for the future. Balance between projects that are safe and likely to yield sound conclusions with those that are risky or technically challenging but could result in major advancements. Balance between time for myself and for my students and mentees. I think I’ve done a pretty good job finding balance, but it’s a continual struggle. I have to remind myself that everyone, from undergrads to National Academy members, face these same issues and we’re very fortunate as academic evolutionary biologists that we have a great community that can help us.

On life outside the lab:

I’m a father of two very energetic young children, and my wife is also a tenure-track professor. Being a parent is much harder but much more fun than I’d imagined. For the last few years my wife and I had to completely re-invent how we decompress from work. Honestly, some Mondays feel like a decompression from parenting! Before we had kids, we would go on long hikes and other ambitious outings, but now we just can’t do things that are so exciting. One thing I’ve tried to do is to see the world through our kids’ eyes, since even a short walk around a pond I’ve seen a hundred times is filled with new discoveries for a 2-year-old.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brachypodium sylvaticum

View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Sara Branco
Department of Microbiology and Immunology
Montana State University
https://saramayerbranco.wixsite.com/brancolab
Start date: August 2017

Ph.D.: Committee on Evolutionary Biology, The University of Chicago; advisor: Dr. Gregory M. Mueller
Postdoc: Biodiversity and Climate Research Center, Frankfurt, Germany; advisor: Dr. Imke Schmitt
Postdoc: Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley; advisors: Dr. Tom Bruns and Dr. John Taylor
Postdoc: Écologie, Systématique et Évolution, Université de Paris Sud; advisor: Dr. Tatiana Giraud
Photo by Krisztina Gat/
Annelaure Pothin.

About the department:

Montana State University is the state’s land grant institution. It creates knowledge and art, and serves communities by integrating learning, discovery, and engagement. The Department of Microbiology and Immunology plays an important role in this mission by providing research, teaching, and service in topics ranging from environmental microbiology, molecular genetics, host-parasite interactions, and disease ecology, to developmental immunology and pathogenicity.

About the research:

The Branco Lab studies the ecology and evolution of fungi to further understand the ecological factors that generate and maintain fungal diversity. Specifically, we use a combination of field, laboratory, and computational approaches to investigate how fungi colonize and persist in the environment. Our studies range across biological scales from ecological communities to genomes and genes, emphasizing evolutionary adaptation to hostile environments.

On being a new faculty member:

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

Starting a lab and developing a research program is not easy, and there are many moments of panic and feelings of impending doom. However, I’ve been very pleasantly surprised with how much fun implementing new projects has been. From working with very enthusiastic students to lengthy discussions with hardware store personnel on the really important questions (e.g., “Will a plastic ladle shatter when dipped in liquid nitrogen?”), there are daily gratifying moments that have been making my experience as a PI so much better.

How was your first faculty meeting?

My first faculty meeting was an all-day gathering to discuss faculty promotion rules. It was long and intense, and I felt like a fish out of water… But it ended being very useful, as I had the opportunity to learn not only about the criteria for promotion, but also how faculty, department, and university think and discuss the topic.

On SSE membership:

I became a member of SSE early in my PhD. I joined the society because I wanted to attend the Evolution meetings and to learn and interact with (so many!) evolutionary biologists working in all aspects of evolution. I still remember being nervous and completely overwhelmed at my first meeting but thrilled to be exposed to such a wide range of topics.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I have been involved in science outreach since I was a student. I participated in several programs, including the Field Museum of Natural History’s activities targeting Chicago inner city high school students and teachers, the Oakland School Unified School District’s “Dinner with a Scientist”, Expanding Your Horizons, and “Science Neat!”, a science outreach event at a bar in San Francisco. In my current position, I continue to promote science for general audiences and have a special interest in reaching under-served communities. In particular, I am working to develop new initiatives aimed at providing learning opportunities to tribal college students in Montana.

Do you teach evolution? What concepts blow student’s minds?

I teach a large course on General Microbiology where I introduce students to evolutionary concepts. Being a class on microbes, it covers bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic diversity, and students get really blown away by the fact that the vast majority of life is microbial, even within eukaryotes. They are even more surprised to learn the relationships across groups (e.g., archaea are closer to eukaryotes than bacteria, and fungi are more closely related to animals than anything else!) and that there were multiple endosymbiotic events that shaped the biodiversity of life we see today (and make interpreting the tree of life so much more confusing!).

Tips and Advice

Do you have a time management tip to share?

It is important to organize your days into time blocks. I assign time to specific tasks, so I can control what I do on a daily basis. It is also important to realize your strengths. For me the mornings are much more productive, therefore I allocate one to two hours first thing in the morning to writing before I even answer email. I keep track of my writing time with ATracker, a free time tracking app, so I know how much time I spent writing per week/month/semester. I also try to schedule meetings in the afternoon, as to dedicate my morning productive hours to more intellectually demanding tasks.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

The postdoc period is full of ups and downs that are not necessarily easy to navigate. My advice to postdocs is to have a clear goal for your next step, whatever that may be, and do your best to progress in all the fronts needed to achieve it. If you are interested in an academic job, focus on publishing research papers and grant proposal writing. If you aim for a teaching-oriented job, gain teaching and course development skills. Learn how to navigate the job market and industry demands if you plan to join the commercial sector. And it really helps to have mentorship throughout this process, so I would also recommend seeking advice from several people with distinct backgrounds, so you obtain different perspectives and make the best decisions for your future.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I played canoe polo back in the day, and my team got the bronze medal at the Woman’s Portuguese National Canoe Polo Championship in the late 90s. I’ll add that canoe polo is not a popular sport in my home country, so maybe the fact that there were only three teams competing might have aided getting a medal…

 

 

 

 

 

 

Suillus luteus. Photo by Michael Wood.

 

 

 

 

 

Photo by Niyi Omotoso.

 

 

 

 

 

Photo by Niyi Omotoso.

 

 

 

 

 

Photo by Niyi Omotoso.


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Dr. Shane Campbell-Staton
Assistant Professor
University of California Los Angeles
Start date: July 2018

PhD: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University; Advisors: Dr. Jonathan Losos and Dr. Scott Edwards
Postdoc: University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana and University of Montana, Missoula; Advisors: Dr. Zac Cheviron and Dr. Julian Catchen

 

About the department:

I am jointly appointed in the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (EEB) Department and the Institute for Society and Genetics (ISG) at UCLA. The EEB department has an amazing group of people who think very broadly about so many questions across biology - including a large group that focuses on population genomics in wild populations, which is a core part of what I do. I am equally as excited to be a member of the ISG, which is a very unique institute. My colleagues in the institute include research scientists, historians, doctors, and artists who are all interested the connection between biology and society in a variety of contexts.

About the research:

I am an evolutionary biologist who studies how climate shapes demographic history and adaptation over prehistoric and contemporary time periods. I combine comparative physiology, genomics, field experimentation, and environmental niche modeling to understand how novel environments produce phenotypic and genetic differences between lineages. With these techniques, my current research explores fitness-related traits of wide-ranging species across environmental clines. A major goal of my research is to understand how complex phenotypes respond to anthropogenic climate change. Human modifications to the natural world present extreme and novel environments for many species around the globe, providing contemporary experiments to test hypotheses regarding climate-mediated evolution and adaptation. I believe the study of evolution in response to human-mediated environmental change is key to understanding, predicting and mitigating deleterious effects of such events.

On being a new faculty member:

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

I don’t have any graduate students or postdocs yet, but I have been thinking a lot about this question. It’s hard realistically to apply any one mentoring strategy to an entire group of scientists. At its core, I think successful mentoring should help to bring out the best of an individual, help them to become the best version of a scientists they can be. Because students and postdocs can have so many different backgrounds, opinions, interests, and skill sets, how you interact and encourage lab members has to be tailor-made for each person. Generally, I hope to build a lab that relies on teamwork and collaborative thinking to pursue collective and individual goals, with each person having the freedom to explore their own interests and flex their creativity under the overarching umbrella of the lab’s scientific missions.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

I am currently recruiting! I am very excited to get my lab up and running over the next few years, and obviously, the people I choose will be a very important part of that process. Above all, I am looking for curious and excited people who are interested in how climate shapes evolution. I think a strength of my research program is that it relies on many different types of data---niche modeling, physiology, gene expression, genomics, etc.---which means there is plenty of room for people with very different expertise/interests to explore questions in the lab, work together, and expand their respective scientific toolkits.

On SSE membership:

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

Joining SSE was certainly one of the best career choices I have made so far. The connections and feedback I have gotten through giving talks, hearing others’ ideas, and attending the Evolution Meetings have played a huge role in shaping the scientist I have become. Science as a field is a strange quirky mix of personal and professional relationships. Community plays such an important role in shaping scientific progress and thinking---that’s what SSE provides. I am very proud to contribute to this community and look forward to doing so for many years.

Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

I recently started a podcast series called “The Biology of Superheroes Podcast” with a friend of mine who works for Warner Bros. Entertainment Group. It has been a really fun way to explore and share biology with a broad audience. We use comic books and science fiction to talk about evolution, technology, and extreme examples of form and function across The Tree of Life. For each episode, I interview a scientist about their research and explore where the science meets the fiction in sci-fi. It has been a really fun project! If you’re interested, please check it out on iTunes or Stitcher.

Tips and Advice

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

If I can cheat a bit….I’ll give two quick pieces of advice to starting graduate students. First, read broadly when you start out. The ideas you formulate in the beginning of your graduate career will shape who you are as a scientist for years to come. I think we are at a point in the field where many of our advancements will come at the crossroads of different sub-disciplines, many of which may seem disconnected at first glance. Reading broadly gives you the opportunity to make those connections and, in doing so, find unique angles for your research. Second, learn a coding language. Big data is the future…or more accurately, the present. Whether you study ecology, behavior, development, or genomics, we are able to collect more data faster than ever before. Learning how to efficiently work with extremely large datasets will save you a lot of pain and energy moving forward….take my word for it.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

When I’m not in the lab/office, I like to spend time doing a few different things that keep me on my toes and help me relax. I like to stay pretty active when I can; I hit the gym and train in mixed martial arts a few days a week. Music is also very important to me. I bought an old vintage record player a few years ago and have gotten really into collecting vinyl now---blues, jazz, soul, etc. It’s been a pretty relaxing pastime. Besides that, I spend a lot of time going on adventures with my dog, a Great Dane named Tatanka. I’m really excited to explore all of the great hiking and walking trails in and around Los Angeles with him this year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

General Terms of use

Welcome to the Society for the Study of Evolution’s (“SSE”) website. These are the general terms of use on which you may make use of this website and the sites listed here (which list may be updated from time to time), whether as a guest or a registered user ('you' or 'user').

Please read these terms of use carefully before you start to use this site or any of those referred to above ('our sites'). By accepting these Terms, or by using any of our sites, you agree to be legally bound by these Terms, our Privacy Statement, and any other underlying agreements or terms. If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use our Site. We reserve the right to modify these Terms at any time without prior notice, and your use of the Site binds you to the changes made. We do occasionally update these terms so please refer to them in the future.

Access to Site

You will be able to access most of our Site without having to register any details with us. However, to access certain parts of our Site, you will need to register with the SSE and create an account, and in some circumstances become a member.

Password and Security Portions of the SSE’s websites are secure and may require you to register in order to participate in those areas. User accounts issued for the SSE’s websites are for individual use only and you are solely responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of your user name and password. You agree to provide accurate and complete information about yourself when registering or otherwise providing information regarding your account and to update your account data to keep it accurate. You agree that we may store and use the information you provide for maintaining your account. You also agree not to misrepresent your identity or affiliation with any person or entity, including (but not limited to) using another person's username, password or other account information. Violations of our security systems may result in civil or criminal liability. You agree to notify us immediately of any unauthorized use of your password or account or any other breach of security. We will take every effort to ensure your online security, but cannot and will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your failure to comply with these provisions.

Use of Site

Our Site, images, data, text, audios, videos, photographs, custom graphics, logos, button icons, descriptions and all other material provided and the collection and compilation and assembly thereof are the exclusive property of the SSE, and are protected by U.S. and international copyright laws.

The contents of our Site may be used for informational purposes only. Any other use of such contents, including the reproduction, modification, distribution, transmission, republication, display or performance of the contents without our prior written consent is expressly forbidden.

Any other trademarks or service marks appearing anywhere on our Site are the property of their respective owners. To the extent any product name or logo does not appear with a trademark (™), it does not constitute a waiver of any and all intellectual property rights that the SSE has established in any of its products, features, or service names or logos.

You may not use, reproduce, modify, transmit, display, publish, sell, create derivative works, or distribute by any means, method, or process whatsoever, now known or hereafter developed, any content of this Site for commercial profit or gain. Nothing in these Terms or on the Site shall be construed as conferring any intellectual property or other proprietary rights to you. You agree to observe copyright and other applicable laws and may not use the content in any manner that infringes or violates the rights of any person or entity. We hold the rights to, or have the right to publish, all of the content on this Site.

As a condition of your use of the Site, you will not use the Site, or any contents or services, for any purpose that is unlawful in any applicable jurisdiction where our Site is being used, or prohibited by these terms, conditions, and notices, and you agree to abide by the terms and conditions set forth in the "User Conduct" section. You may not use the Site contents or services in any manner that could damage, disable, overburden, or impair any of our equipment or interfere with any other party's use and enjoyment of the Site, or any contents or services. You may not attempt to gain access to any portion of the Site, or any of its contents or services, other than those for which you are authorized.

While every effort is made for the timeliness and accuracy of the Site content and services, we make no warranties either express or implied, and assume no liability or responsibility for the completeness, use, accuracy, reliability, correctness, timeliness or usefulness, of any of the results obtained from its use.

We make no representation or warranty, express or implied, with respect to the content of the Site, or links to other websites, including but not limited to accurateness, completeness, correctness, timeliness or reliability. We make no representation or warranty regarding the merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use with respect to any content or services whatsoever that may be accessed through this Site, or the results to be obtained from using the Site. We make no representation or warranty that the Site or content is free from defects or viruses. Your use of external links and third-party websites is at your own risk and subject to the terms and conditions of use for such links and websites.

While every effort is made so that all content provided on the Site does not contain viruses and/or harmful materials, you should take reasonable and appropriate precautions to scan for viruses or otherwise protect your computer or device, and you should have a complete and current backup of the applicable items on your computer or device. We disclaim any liability for the need for services or replacing equipment or data resulting from your use of the Site. While every effort is made for smooth and continuous operation, we do not warrant the Site will operate error free.

By submitting a telephone number to the SSE you agree that a representative of the SSE can contact you at the number you provide, potentially using automated technology (including texts/SMS messaging) or a pre-recorded message. Your consent is not an obligation to receive any of our services.

Site Uptime

We take all reasonable steps so that our Site is available 24 hours every day, 365 days per year. However, websites do sometimes encounter downtime due to server and other technical issues. Therefore, we will not be liable if this Site is unavailable at any time.

Our Site may be temporarily unavailable due to issues such as system failure, maintenance or repair, or for reasons beyond our control. Where possible, we will try to give our users advance warning of maintenance issues, but shall not be obliged to do so.

Your Submissions to Our Websites We may expressly request or enable you to submit, post, upload, embed, display, communicate or otherwise distribute messages, ideas, concepts, drawings, photographs, graphics, videos, or other material or information through a SSE website ("Submissions"). Please do not make any Submissions to or through our websites that we do not expressly request or enable you to submit. Our policies regarding Submissions apply regardless of whether we request any Submission received on or through our websites.

Some of our websites may contain communications services provided through forums, bulletin board services, chat areas, message boards, news groups, communities, personal web pages, calendars, and/or other message or communication features designed to allow you to communicate with others. You agree to use such communication services only to make and receive Submissions that are related to the particular communication service and in accord with these Terms.

You agree that you will not post, send, publish, or transmit any Submission that:

Violates any copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret, intellectual property or other proprietary or contractual right; orAdvertises any commercial or business endeavor (for example, offering products or services) or otherwise engages in any commercial activity (for example, conducting raffles or contests, displaying sponsorship banners, and/or soliciting goods or services) except as may be specifically authorized by us;Openly seeks, or passively collects, personal or personally identifiable information about or from others; orIncludes programs that contain viruses, worms and/or Trojan horses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the use or enjoyment of any our websites; orOtherwise violates any provision of these Terms.

The SSE does not endorse any Submission and expressly disclaims any and all liability in connection with any Submission. The SSE may refuse or remove any Submission that, in its sole judgment, violates these Terms. You are solely responsible for any Submission you submit to any of our websites.

You should be aware that in some instances, your Submissions are public, not private communications. When you are using the areas of our websites that publicly display Submissions, you should assume that any Submissions you make to these areas also are subject to being made public. You should never post any message that you would not mind seeing on a school or community bulletin board or in the local newspaper. The privacy of others also should be respected at all times. If you need permission to use any photos, writings or other material or any identifying information contained in a Submission, you are responsible for obtaining documentation of such permission before posting the Submission. We may prohibit or remove certain Submissions that have been posted in public areas of our websites, in accord with our policies, but we are under no general duty to monitor the public posting of Submissions in such areas. When you voluntarily disclose any personal information (which is further defined in our Privacy Policy) through any Submission in a public area, that information can be viewed, collected and used by others and may result in unsolicited messages from other people, for which we shall have no responsibility.

By providing Submissions to any of our web sites, you hereby grant the SSE the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, non-exclusive right and license to reproduce, use, copy, sell, distribute, create derivative works from, perform, and display all or part of the Submission in any form, media, or technology now known or later developed. Except in the case of certain Submissions by students or teachers participating in any form of online instruction, the SSE will not be required to treat any Submission as confidential. However, we may use any Submission in our business endeavors (including without limitation, for products or advertising) in a manner consistent with our privacy policies, without incurring any liability for royalties or any other consideration of any kind, and will not incur any liability as a result of any similarities that may appear in our future operations.

By providing Submissions to a SSE website, you also represent and warrant that the Submission is your original work, does not violate any agreement between you and a third party, and shall not infringe upon or violate any law, agreement or other rights of any kind, of any third party, without limitation, rights affecting copyright, patent, trademark, unfair competition, contract, defamation, privacy or publicity.

Access to and use of secure areas of SSE sites is considered a privilege provided at the discretion of the SSE. The SSE reserves the right to monitor use of its websites to determine compliance with these Terms, to investigate any reported or apparent violation, and to take any action that we in our sole discretion deem appropriate. We also reserve the right to immediately withdraw access and use of our sites when there is reason to believe that violations of law or our policies have occurred. We also reserve the right at all times to disclose any information as necessary to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request, and to edit, refuse to post or to remove any information or materials, in whole or in part, in our sole discretion. Submissions provided to any of our websites may be subject to posted limits on use, reproduction and/or dissemination and you are responsible for abiding by such limitations with respect to any Submissions that you provide, as well as any materials that you may download.

User Conduct

When using our Site, you shall not post or send to or from the Sites:

content which conflicts with our published “Guidelines for Professional Ethics”content that is discriminatory, obscene, pornographic, defamatory, liable to incite racial hatred, in breach of confidentiality or privacy, which may cause annoyance or inconvenience to others, which encourages or constitutes conduct that would be deemed a criminal offense, give rise to a civil liability, or otherwise is contrary to the law in any applicable jurisdiction where our Site is being used;(c) content which is harmful in nature including, and without limitation, computer viruses, Trojan horses, corrupted data, or other potentially harmful software or data.

We will fully cooperate with any law enforcement authorities or court order requiring us to disclose the identity or other details or any person posting materials to our Site in breach of the this Section.

You shall not use our Site while distracted or preoccupied, such as when operating a motor vehicle. You should access our Site only with due regard for your own safety and the safety of others.

Links to and from Third Party Websites

Some links furnished on our Site may allow you to leave our Site. These third party websites are not under our control and we disclaim any responsibility for the contents of such linked websites or any link(s) contained in any such linked website(s) or any changes or updates to any of these websites. We further disclaim any responsibility for any form of transmission received from any linked third party website or advertising. We provide these links to you as a convenience to you and inclusion of any link herein shall in no way be construed as an endorsement by us of the website(s).

If you would like to link to our Site, you may only do so on the basis that you link to, but do not replicate, any page of our Site, and subject to the following conditions:

(a) you do not in any way imply that we are endorsing any services or products unless this has been specifically agreed with us;(b) you do not misrepresent your relationship with us or present any false information about us; and(c) your website does not contain content that is offensive, controversial, infringes any intellectual property rights or other rights of any other person or does not comply in any way with the law of the United States of America.

If you choose to link our Site in breach of this Section, you shall fully indemnify us for any loss or damage suffered as a result of your actions.

Termination of Service

These Terms of Use constitute an agreement that is effective until terminated by either party.

You are not required to continue use of these services. And, if you are dissatisfied with any aspect of the services, you are encouraged to contact SSE Headquarters to discuss your concerns.

You may ask us to close your account at any time by sending us an email. We reserve the right to terminate this agreement, as well as your access to any or all of our websites and the related services or any portion thereof, at any time, without notice.

Effect of Termination

Upon termination of this Agreement, you will no longer access or use any part of this website or use any service or software to access or use this website. Your representations, warranties, and agreements with respect to your past access and use will continue in effect (for example, the licenses granted to the SSE for content that you uploaded; and your indemnification against infringement with respect to such materials) but you will incur no new obligations because there will be no future use.

Disclaimers

All information on our Site is of a general nature and is furnished for your knowledge and understanding and as an informational resource only. The documents and any related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information contained on our Site. We may make improvements and/or changes to any of the products depicted or described herein at any time. We expressly disclaim any responsibility or liability for any adverse consequences or damages resulting from your use of the Site or reliance on the information from either.

THE SITE IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS. WE MAKE NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REPRESENTATIONS OR ENDORSEMENTS WHATSOEVER WITH REGARD TO ANY PRODUCTS, INFORMATION OR SERVICE PROVIDED THROUGH THIS SITE, INCLUDING, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, OR ANY OTHER WARRANTY, CONDITION, GUARANTY, OR REPRESENTATION, WHETHER ORAL OR IN WRITING, OR IN ELECTRONIC FORM.

THE SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF EVOLUTION DOES NOT WARRANT OR ASSUME ANY LEGAL LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR USEFULNESS OF ANY INFORMATION DESCRIBED WITHIN OR DERIVED FROM OUR SITE OR SERVICE.

Limitation of Liability

YOUR USE OF OUR SITE IS ENTIRELY AT YOUR OWN RISK. WE WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE TO YOU OR TO ANY THIRD PARTIES FOR ANY DIRECT OR INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES OR LOSSES OR INJURY YOU MAY INCUR IN CONNECTION WITH YOUR USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE SITE OR THE SERVICES AND/OR PRODUCTS, OR YOUR RELIANCE ON OR USE OF THE SITE, THE INFORMATION, PRODUCTS OR SERVICES PROVIDED, OR THAT RESULT FROM MISTAKES, OMISSIONS, INTERRUPTIONS, DELETIONS OR ANY FAILURE OF PERFORMANCE, OR ANY OF THE DATA OR OTHER MATERIALS TRANSMITTED THROUGH OR RESIDING ON OUR SITE, REGARDLESS OF THE TYPE OF CLAIM OR THE NATURE OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION, EVEN IF WE HAVE ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE OR LOSS.

Indemnification

You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold us, our officers, directors, employees, volunteers, agents, licensors, and suppliers, harmless from and against any claims, actions or demands, liabilities and settlements including without limitation, reasonable legal and accounting fees, resulting from or alleged to result from, your use of and access to the Site or your violation of these Terms or your violation of any third party right, including without limitation any trademark, copyright or other proprietary or privacy right.

Assignment

These Terms, and any rights and licenses granted hereunder, may not be transferred or assigned by you.

Applicable Law

We make no representations that the content or the Site is appropriate or may be used or downloaded outside the United States. Access to the Site and/or the content may not be legal in certain countries outside the United States. If you access the Site from outside the United States, you do so at your own risk and are responsible for compliance with the laws of the jurisdiction from which you access the Site.

Our Site is created in and controlled by laws of the State of Missouri, United States of America. The Site, and its contents, and any disputes arising therefrom shall be construed and interpreted under the laws of the State of Missouri, and applicable United States federal laws. Use of our Site constitutes agreement of the user to the jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located therein.

Our Site is subject to the United States export control laws and regulations, and may be subject to export or import regulations in other countries. You agree to strictly comply with all such laws and regulations and acknowledge that you have the responsibility to obtain authorization to export, re-export, or import of any data on our Site, as may be required.

General

These Terms, together with the Privacy Policy, other terms or legal notices published by us on the Site, and any other applicable agreements, shall constitute the entire agreement between us concerning use of the Site. If any provision of these Terms is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity of such provision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of these Terms, which shall remain in full force and effect. No waiver of any term shall be deemed a further or continuing waiver of such term or any other term, and our failure to assert any right or provision under these Terms shall not constitute a waiver of such right or provision. YOU AGREE THAT ANY CAUSE OF ACTION ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE SITE MUST COMMENCE WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR AFTER THE CAUSE OF ACTION ACCRUES. OTHERWISE, SUCH CAUSE OF ACTION IS PERMANENTLY BARRED.

Our Contact Information

Society for the Study of Evolution 4475 Castleman Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110-3201 Voice: 314-577-9566 · FAX: 314-558-9184 · Email: sse-manager@botany.org Effective Date: May 24, 2018


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Michael Sheehan
Assistant Professor
Department of Neurobiology and Behavior
Cornell University
https://sheehanlab.weebly.com/
Start date: July 2015


PhD: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan. Advisor: Elizabeth Tibbetts
Postdoc: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona; Integrative Biology and the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, UC Berkeley. Advisor: Michael Nachman

About the department:

I’m in the Department of Neurobiology and Behavior at Cornell University. It is an unusual department that put together evolutionary and behavioral ecologists with neuroscientists – all people interested in behavior but from different angles. I was particularly drawn here as I’m interested in the genetic basis of behavior, which ultimately means finding out how genes influence neurons and circuits.

About the research:

My research seeks to understand the causes and consequences of social evolution. Most of my work has focused on how animals recognize other individuals within their social groups. Currently we have projects examining various aspects of evolution of individual recognition in both paper wasps and house mice. In wasps we are seeking to identify the genetic basis of cognitive abilities and phenotypic diversity associated with recognition. In mice, we are looking at how animals allocate individually distinctive scent marks across social and ecological contexts. Generally, we aim to take an integrative approach to understanding behavioral evolution.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

One of the biggest challenges has been time management – specifically trying to find time for my own research. I had always envisioned that in addition to all of the projects done by people in my lab I would still do my own projects too. I do have projects where I am collecting and analyzing the data. Even when I think “This week I will finish part X of this”, I end up getting derailed by 10 other things that come up in the lab and don’t get nearly as much done as I would have hoped. Obviously, lots of things are still getting done on various projects, just not maybe the one I had planned. The mental switch from someone doing science to someone managing science is a challenge!

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

My favorite story from an SSE meeting happened at a poster session during the 2014 meeting in Raleigh. My wife (another new faculty SSE member Tory Hendry) and I were both presenting at the conference and had our 3 year old with us. We were talking to a small group of other parents with young kids when suddenly all the kids started running around giggling. We looked over and realized that a guy about 30 feet away was moving around the free conference-swag laser pointer on the floor and kids were all chasing it around like they were cats. I think they must have continued chasing the light for 20 minutes. The kids eventually figured out what was going on, but thought it was great fun…and it really tired them out! (p.s. I have used this trick with kids at other times and it seem to generally work).

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I’m currently working with the local hands-on children’s museum in Ithaca, the Sciencenter, on a project to engage middle school students in developing novel ways to communicate about evolution and animal behavior. The Sciencenter’s program fosters students’ development of communication skills as well as scientific concepts. Over the next few years, working with these middle-school aged students, we are going to design and erect informational displays and signage in many of the heavily visited local state parks. I’m especially excited about this project because I will be able to have a direct interaction with a smaller number of students that can then ripple out to a much larger community through the interpretive displays and signs that we design together.

Do you have a favorite science, book, TV show, podcast or blog?

Certainly as evolutionary biologists we all appreciate the important role the past has had in shaping modern patterns of diversity, but I certainly had not had a class that emphasized the deep history of life. This always struck me as odd. I have certainly learned a lot from reading books like The Ancestor’s Tale but would like to give a shout out to the kids cartoon Dinosaur Train for its excellent review of life throughout the Mesozoic. I have watched a lot of those episodes with our son when he was younger and definitely learned about Earth history.

How was your first faculty meeting?

To be honest, I don’t really remember. In general they are pretty boring, with people chiming in more than is probably needed in many cases (I’m guilty too). Since most of my department isn’t SSE members, I guess it’s fine to say that, though I think most wouldn’t disagree. I certainly appreciate that faculty meetings have a purpose, but I think we all wish the purpose was arrived at more promptly.

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Aleeza Gerstein
Assistant Professor, Departments of Microbiology & Statistics
University of Manitoba
https://acgerstein.weebly.com
Start date: September 2018





MSc & PhD: Department of Zoology, The University of British Columbia. Advisor: Sally Otto
Postdoc: Department of Molecular Microbiology & Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University and Department of Genetics, Cell Biology & Development, The University of Minnesota. Advisor: Dr. Judith Berman
Postdoc: Department of Microbiology & Immunology, The University of Minnesota. Advisor: Kirsten Nielsen

About the department:

I hold a joint appointment between the Microbiology and Statistics Departments at the University of Manitoba, in Winnipeg Canada, which is the major doctoral-granting institution in my hometown. Micro and Stats are two departments that haven’t traditionally interacted very much, and I’m part of an institutional experiment of sorts to help foster communication and collaboration between different departments in the Faculty of Science. My first class is going to be a Microbiology graduate student module on “Data analysis and visualization using R”.

About the research:

We seek to understand how different ecological and genomic factors constrain or enhance the appearance and spread of beneficial variation, and hence influence the rate and predictability of evolution. We work with fungal microbes, both as a model system to study the genetic basis of evolution (taking advantage of the “awesome power of yeast genetics”), as well as to understand adaptation in these species for their own sake. Fungal microbes have incredibly labile genomes, and karyotypic mutations (i.e., changes in ploidy, the number of chromosome sets, and aneuploidy, copy number change in one or several chromosomes) are commonly observed in response to stressful environments. A major current focus is to apply evolutionary principles to study the acquisition of drug resistance in human fungal pathogens.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

Yes! I’ve been interviewing potential undergraduate and graduate students. One student turned up to the interview with a full page of questions she thought of while reading the information on my webpage. We had a great discussion about what I’ve previously done and am currently working on and she even proposed a novel method that could be useful. Needless to say, she’s the first official student of my nascent lab!

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career? Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

My first Evolution meeting was in Fort Collins, Colorado in 2004, six months after I started graduate school. Although I remember being overwhelmed by how much I didn’t know (a talk about the G-matrix stands out), I also remember a feeling of coming home, and realizing that so many people were interested in evolution and that there were many different ways to study evolutionary questions. I also remember one night a large group of people were going out to a bar and in what I realize now is typical American-fashion, everyone including professors who were clearly well over 21 were getting ID’d. I believe that Peter Keightly was flabbergasted when he was denied entry to the bar because he wasn’t carrying his passport, and was sent back to the dorms to retrieve it.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

My first Evolution paper was last year (Gerstein, Lim, Berman & Hickman, Ploidy tug-of-war: Evolutionary and genetic environments influence the rate of ploidy drive in a human fungal pathogen. Evolution. 71: 1025-1038, 2017). This was a really special paper for a number of reasons. The second author, Suzie Lim, was the first undergraduate honours student that I mentored, and this is the first publication where I get to say that I didn’t physically collect a single data point. It was also a really fun science collaboration, because Meleah Hickman and I had been postdocs together in Judy Bermans lab in Minnesota, and we had a great time analyzing the data and writing the paper together. Every paper I’ve written has benefited tremendously from peer review, and though I’ve encountered many helpful Associate Editors, our AE for this manuscript, Maurine Neiman, really went above and beyond in shepherding this paper through peer review and drawing out a polished version of the story.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I’m a firm believer that as scientists we have a responsibility to communicate scientific ideas and principles to the general public. I currently sit as a citizen member of the advisory panel on OurWinnipeg, the official 20 year plan for the city of Winnipeg. I believe scientists have a lot to contribute to improving civic life, and was very pleased to be selected for this role.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Grad school is such a different experience for everyone in terms of projects, geographic locations and family circumstances—try not to compare yourself to everyone around you or on Twitter. I can tell you why I think I was successful – I found an amazing and supportive advisor that had a mentorship style that worked for me and who looked out for my best interests. I found my tribe, and was surrounded by curious, enthusiastic friends who taught me more by diffusion over beers than any textbook ever could. I always felt supported intellectually and emotionally, and truthfully these same people are still supporting me (and reading drafts of my grants!) even through we’re all scattered across the world now. I wish this experience for everyone. Also, regardless of your project, learn at least the basics of a programming language (I suggest R or Python; sorry, couldn’t resist).

How do you maintain a work-life balance?

I have a two and a half year old, so that helps a lot! I was also fortunate to be surrounded in graduate school by people who embraced a ‘work hard play hard’ approach. In grad school I spent almost every weekend in the lab, but I also didn’t hesitate to head to the mountains for a day of snowboarding if it was a powder Tuesday. As a postdoc, like many people, I found precarious employment mentally draining and incredibly stressful at times. I was able to cultivate a great group of friends primarily outside of academia, and this helped me to maintain perspective on things and get me out of the lab.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Materials used for a single day of a single experiment during Dr. Gerstein's postdoc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research origin story: Measuring Saguaro heights during a desert ecology field course in the Sonoran desert.

View full page

The Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) is dedicated to promoting a broader understanding of evolutionary biology and its related subfields. We encourage the professional development of our members and support increasing participation and access. At the scientific core of evolutionary biology is a value for and appreciation of biological diversity. Accordingly, we welcome, support, and celebrate the diversity of our members. We are sensitive to the ways that diversity changes and grows in modern society and acknowledge that diversity principles change through time. As a professional society we promote equity, inclusion, and diversity at all levels, and we encourage participation by individuals of all groups. We encourage an inclusive, supportive, and impartial workspace free from discrimination, bigotry, sexual harassment, or violence of any kind. Finally, we strive to facilitate the effective communication of evolutionary principles to the public to foster a broader understanding of evolutionary biology, biological diversity, and cultural inclusion.


View full page

Society for the Study of Evolution Diversity Committee Deadline Extended: January 19.
 

Apply to Join the SSE Diversity Committee

The Diversity Committee seeks to add at least two to four new members to the committee starting in 2024. 

The DC works to support members from all backgrounds through several main actions: 

  • broadening representation to the SSE Executive Council
  • pursuing initiatives that support historically excluded groups
  • creating an inclusive, accessible environment at the annual Evolution meeting and in evolutionary biology in general 

Applicants must be members of SSE (join or renew your membership) and have attended at least one Evolution meeting in the past. We are especially in search of members who have experience in leading and completing successful projects related to equity and inclusion, even in challenging circumstances. We encourage applications from individuals at all career stages, including those who are grad students, postdocs, pre-tenure faculty, or in secure or post-tenure academic or non-academic positions. This year we are particularly interested in adding new members who are grad students or postdocs.

How to Apply

Applicants should submit a brief (1-2 page) statement of interest outlining three items on which applications will be evaluated: 

1) their experience with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) service; 
2) any ideas, priorities, and/or events they plan to contribute during their 3-year term; 
3) the unique elements of their perspective/background that they bring to the committee. 

Applications should also confirm:

- career stage and institutional affiliation
- membership in SSE
- past attendance at Evolution meetings

Please submit your application by January 15, 2024 January 19, 2024 to diversity@evolutionsociety.org. Questions may also be directed to this email address.


What does the Diversity Committee do?

Many of the DC’s initiatives are created and operated with the DCs of our sister societies, the American Society of Naturalists (ASN) and the Society of Systematic Biologists (SSB). Given SSE’s commitment to promoting DEI as an ongoing effort, we are open to new initiatives and ideas on how to best serve our members and the broader community.

Examples of past efforts of the SSE DC include:

- Development and administration of a climate survey to assess inclusion and equity in evolutionary biology, in collaboration with ASN and SSB.
- Working closely with a diversity consultant to form SSE’s mission with respect to diversity, equity, and inclusion, to assess the inclusivity of SSE’s policies and practices, and to develop a strategic plan for making SSE more supportive and inclusive moving forward.
- Creation of guidelines on best practices for awards procedures.

Examples of ongoing or future efforts of the SSE DC include:

- Events at the annual Evolution meeting, including Story Collider and mixers to build community among LGBTQ+ biologists, biologists with disabilities, biologists of color, biologists at primarily undergraduate-serving institutions, and parents (see more info here).
- Improving accessibility at the Evolution meeting for scientists with disabilities, scientists of marginalized genders, and scientists who are nursing/caretaking.
- Data collection and analysis regarding the demographic composition of SSE.
- Collaborating on major initiatives with SSE Council and the Editor-in-Chief of Evolution to improve access, equity, inclusion, and diversity in our society.

 

Mission

The SSE Diversity Committee will promote diversity and inclusiveness to enhance the field of evolutionary biology and foster the career of its developing scientists.

Vision

A diverse and inclusive SSE will foster innovation, creativity, and inclusion at all professional levels.

Values

Evolutionary biology as a discipline studies diversity. The SSE Diversity Committee’s goals are: 1) to celebrate and foster the inclusion of all social, racial, and economic groups in the Society and 2) to promote the advancement of the study of evolutionary biology among underrepresented groups by fostering the recruitment and retention of individuals of all identity groups. Our guiding principles are:

Inclusiveness: Improving the inclusion of underrepresented minority scientists in the field of evolutionary biology.

Retention: Devising and implementing strategies for the retention of underrepresented scientists.

Mentorship: Showing by example by pairing early-career scholars with mid-career and advanced career scientists.

Professional development: Supporting scientific and policy leaders through educational opportunities.

Informed decision making: Using data collection initiatives related to diversity to guide decisions that directly or indirectly connect to our values and guiding principles.

Diversity Statement

The Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) is dedicated to promoting a broader understanding of evolutionary biology and its related subfields. We encourage the professional development of our members and support increasing participation and access. At the scientific core of evolutionary biology is a value for and appreciation of biological diversity. Accordingly, we welcome, support, and celebrate the diversity of our members. We are sensitive to the ways that diversity changes and grows in modern society and acknowledge that diversity principles change through time. As a professional society we promote equity, inclusion, and diversity at all levels, and we encourage participation by individuals of all groups. We encourage an inclusive, supportive, and impartial workspace free from discrimination, bigotry, sexual harassment, or violence of any kind. Finally, we strive to facilitate the effective communication of evolutionary principles to the public to foster a broader understanding of evolutionary biology, biological diversity, and cultural inclusion.

Statement Against Racism and Racial Injustice
Tri-Society Statement Against AAPI Racism

Learn more about SSE's Commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI).

Learn more about the Diversity Committee's founding, actions, and goals in this archived January 2020 blog post.
 

Diversity Committee

Kelsey Byers (Co-Chair)
Pamela Yeh (Co-Chair)
Ana Paula Aprígio Assis
Isabela Borges
Ana Caicedo
Scott Gevaert
Johanna Harvey
Jordan Lewis
Maria Orive
Elizabeth Ostrowski
Martha Reiskind
Sarah Schaack
Laurie Stevison
Scott Taylor
Carrie Tribble
Xianfa Xie

diversity [at] evolutionsociety.org

Diversity Resources

Best Practices - Posters and Oral Presentations

Diversity at Evolution

In service to the goals of the annual Evolution meeting's three sponsoring societies (ASN, SSB, and SSE), the conference organizers and the Joint Meeting Committee are committed to providing a welcoming and inclusive environment for all attendees. In 2022, the DC organized the following events, in addition to a series of mixers:

Diversity Symposium
"Field Ethics and Safety in Evolution and Ecology: Expereinces and Tools for Inclusive Practices"
With the American Society of Naturalists and the Society of Systematic Biologists Diversity Committees
Organized by Cathy Rushworth with Nancy Chen, Scott Taylor, Lily Khadempour, Tim Colston, Jessica Ware, and Tracy Heath

Evolution's Rainbow
Engaging talks and discussion on evolution’s rainbow, with special guest host Nina West. This event starts with a series of talks from experts on the diversity of sex, sexuality, and gender that exist in nature, and ends with a panel discussion on how this diversity fits into a broader evolutionary context and what we as a community can do to support and retain our LGBTQ+ students and colleagues.
Organized by Jenn Coughlan, Cathy Rushworth, Scott Taylor, Arun Sethuraman, and Austin Garner


 

SSE Membership Award

This award offers free two-year SSE memberships to 100 individuals of any career stage who identify as racial or ethnic minorities, either in their country of origin or their country of residence. This initiative is part of SSE Council’s 2020 commitment to actions to increase inclusion of and support for members of historically excluded groups, particularly individuals who identify as Black, Indigenous, or people of color (BIPOC), in the field of evolutionary biology and through all of the society’s activities and programs. Learn more and apply here



 

Evolution's Rainbow event at Evolution 2022

  
  

Story Collider Event at Evolution 2019

At the Evolution 2019 meeting in Providence, RI, the Diversity Committee hosted a special event by the Story Collider, where five scientists shared their true, personal stories. Listen below. Photos by David Del Poío.

Aparna Agrawal

Patty Brennan

Ambika Kamath

C. Brandon Ogbunu

Scott Taylor


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Anahí Espíndola
Assistant Professor
Department of Entomology
University of Maryland, College Park
http://anahiespindola.github.io
Start date: August 2018

PhD: University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Advisors: Dr. Nadir Alvarez, Dr. Martine Rahier.
Post-doc: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho. Advisors: Dr. Scott Nuismer, Dr. Jack Sullivan, Dr. David Tank.

About the department:

I am an Assistant Professor in the Department of Entomology at the University of Maryland, College Park. The breadth of the research done in the Department allows us to combine state-of-the-art basic research with applied work in outreach and extension. The Department is also unique in the fact that we have a Faculty sex-ratio of 1:1, the reflection of a long-term commitment to fair hiring.

About the research:

I am an evolutionary ecologist, and am interested in understanding how the abiotic and biotic environment affects the way species interact and diversify. My research focuses mostly on pollination systems and a big part of my focus is now on the New World plant genus Calceolaria and its oil-bees of genera Chalepogenus and Centris. Another complementary part of my research is focused on identifying how the landscape affects pollination interactions in fragmented landscapes, something that has important implications for both our understanding of the evolution and ecology of communities, and their conservation. To study these topics, I combine phylogenetic, spatial, and ecological methods, using both experimental/field data and computational tools.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Taking the responsibility of making decisions that I know will impact other people’s careers.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

The strong support and help I receive from all my colleagues in the Department and Colleges I am associated with.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

I feel strongly about helping people in their careers. Being a Latina makes me extremely aware of the difficulties underrepresented groups have to access leadership roles, and of the small number of role models present for those groups. I want to be both a supportive and strong advisor who provides opportunities to my lab members. My goal is to create an inclusive, respectful and creative environment that allows everybody to succeed.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

Even though the application deadlines for the next Fall are now closed, I am always looking for motivated and creative new lab members!

When and why did you become a SSE member?

When I finished my PhD in Switzerland, my advisor offered me a membership to SSE as a ‘farewell gift’. I didn’t realize at the time how important this was, and how much it would impact my career. I’ll be forever thankful for that gift.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

SSE allows me to connect with other evolutionary biologists and ecologists, and to access high-level research from all around the world.

Besides research, how do you promote science? / How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

I usually like talking about what I do and how it impacts people’s lives with whoever wants to talk to me. However, I think that one of the actions I feel the proudest about in my science ‘outreach’ was being elected to participate as a Lead Author in the first UN-mandated IPBES report on pollinators, pollination, and food production (https://www.ipbes.net/assessment-reports/pollinators). Here, my ‘hybrid’ evolutionary and ecological background was extremely useful, because I could contribute with an evolutionary perspective in a theme that is usually considered mostly from an ecological point of view, making the report more all-encompassing. The work we did along with other world experts in pollination led to the production of documents that can be directly used by stakeholders, and led sometimes very directly to many of the changes in policies and actions that we are now seeing globally in respect to pollinator policies. This experience was absolutely humbling and rewarding, and even though it was a LOT of work, I would not hesitate a second to do it all over again if the opportunity came up.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

I make long-term goals and have a long-term plan. From there, I can identify specific actions that will make me reach my goals. I then use those actions to create to-do lists for each year, semester, month, week, day, etc. Having lists and holding myself accountable for doing the things on the list makes me organize my time and get stuff done, and helps me set priorities.

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

Tree Thinking, by Baum and Smith.
Charles Darwin’s Beagle Diary.
The Malay Archipelago, by Alfred Wallace.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Be creative, be a good person, and know why you’re going into a graduate program and what you want to get out of it.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Set goals and start applying for jobs even if you think you’re not good enough. Don’t underestimate your knowledge.

How was your first faculty meeting?

Great. The Department here is very collegial and matter-of-fact; so we got stuff discussed and decided.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I LOVE reading, and I play roller derby with the DC Rollergirls!

 

Calceolaria corymbosa

 

 

 

Centris on Calceolaria ascendens

 

 

 

Chalepogenus on Calceolaria dentata

 

 

 

Collecting Calceolaria in Chile

 

 

 

Calceolaria corymbosa close to Laguna del Maule, Chile

 

 

 

Reproductive tests in the greenhouse

View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Melissa Kemp
Assistant Professor
Department of Integrative Biology
The University of Texas at Austin
www.melissakemp.com
Start date: September 2018

PhD: Department of Biology, Stanford University. Advisor: Dr. Elizabeth Hadly.
Postdoc: Department of Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University. Advisor: Dr. Jonathan Losos.

About the department:

I am an Assistant professor at the University of Texas at Austin in the Department of Integrative Biology, with a courtesy appointment in the Jackson School of Geosciences. I love the diversity of approaches and research interests represented at UT, and the collections of the Vertebrate Paleontology Lab are an asset to my research. Austin is also a wonderful, vibrant city!

About the research:

My research seeks to understand how environmental perturbations (such as global warming, human colonization events, and sea-level change), shape vertebrate communities through time and space. We utilize paleontological and ecological data from the Quaternary (2.58 ma – present) to assess the extent and ramifications of past instances of extinction, diversification, and colonization. By learning how lineages responded to past environmental perturbations, we aim to make predictions about ongoing and future responses to global change phenomena, which will have implications in conservation. While we work primarily with insular lizards, we are expanding our research program to other taxonomic groups and continental systems.

How have you prepared to be a PI?

I read a lot of blog posts and books about starting a new lab, as well as managing people. Being a PI is kind of like being a small business owner but most of our training doesn’t emphasize managing people. Literature on this subject has been very helpful in developing mentoring strategies, time management, and planning my research program.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

I am still crafting my approach to mentoring people in my lab, but my overarching rule is that a one-size-fits-all model of mentoring does not work. At the beginning of the semester, I had everyone in my lab create an individual development plan to outline short-term and long-term goals. We went over these plans as well as our expectations of one another. I plan to revisit these topics regularly with each lab member, as I imagine that our goals and expectations will change as we grow. My ultimate goal is to establish an environment where everyone in the lab communicates freely and respectably with one another, regardless of rank.

What does being a SSE member mean to you?

I am proud to be a member of SSE. The society’s leadership listens to its members and has worked very hard to create an inclusive environment at the Evolution meetings. I had the honor of serving on SSE’s Graduate Student Advisory Committee (GSAC) and I saw firsthand how dedicated SSE is to promoting and celebrating early career scientists through various awards and research grants. Our GSAC representatives are creative, hard-working graduate students and postdocs who have developed various programs that benefit all members of SSE, and their initiatives wouldn’t be possible without the support of SSE leadership. Through my participation in the GSAC, I also saw how much work goes into planning an Evolution Meeting, and I definitely don’t take it for granted anymore!

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I promote science by being visible to the public. Scientists spend a lot of time with each other, both professionally and personally, and we often fail to realize that most people don’t even know a scientist, let alone interact with one on a regular basis. I visit high school classrooms to discuss what I do and answer questions that students have about what it means to be a scientist. I also promote science through research experiences aimed at pre-collegiate students. During my postdoc I trained four high school students in paleontology and my lab is working on developing a high school research program for students in Texas.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

One thing that I’ve experienced as a new faculty member is that my week can be consumed by meetings and classes pretty easily, leaving me little time to get any research work done. I spend about 30 minutes every Sunday planning out my schedule for the week. I try my best to relegate all of my meetings to one day a week, leaving other days free for research. I try to overestimate the amount of time it will take me to complete a task, and I leave 15 minute gaps in between activities so that I can transition from one thing to another with ease.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Don’t underestimate the power of an ask. Some of my most meaningful collaborations developed from sending out a cold e-mail asking a stranger about specimens or research localities. It can be intimidating to contact someone that you don’t know, but more often than not, it’s worth it. Likewise, don’t exclude yourself from opportunities because you don’t think that you are a strong applicant. We are often our own worst critic.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

My formative years were spent training in the fine arts, preparing for a career as an artist. Although I loved science as a kid, it wasn’t until the end of high school that I started thinking about a career as a scientist. I value all of the years I spent in the arts, though, and I think that it has made me a better scientist. I learned how to handle criticism at an early age and it pushed me to think creatively.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I enjoy cooking and genealogy research. Even though I am an only child, I have a large extended family and I love spending time with them as well.

 

Screening fossil material from a cave locality in the Caribbean

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Emily B. Sessa
Assistant Professor
Biology Department
University of Florida
https://sessalab.biology.ufl.edu
Start date: August 2013

PhD: Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin–Madison. Advisor: Dr. Thomas Givnish.
Postdoc: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona. Advisor: Dr. Michael Barker.

About the department:

I am an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biology at the University of Florida. We are a broad biology department, so my colleagues are a mix of empirical and theoretically-oriented scientists working on many different organisms and systems. We have a strong graduate program with phenomenal graduate students!

About the research:

The goal of my research program is to understand the evolutionary and ecological processes that shape plant diversity. I’m particularly interested in the seed-free plants, ferns and lycophytes, which are beautiful and wonderful plants that are fascinating for a number of reasons. Many aspects of their ecology and evolution differ from what we see in other land plants, and ferns and lycophytes are critical members of the ecosystems where they occur, even though they typically get less attention than their flashier relatives (the flowering plants). Most of the work in my lab is focused on ferns, and phylogenies are the framework we use to understand evolution in nearly all of the work that my students and I do.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Learning all the intricate details of dealing with various bureaucracies, both at my institution and at funding agencies. For example, submitting full proposals to NSF or NIH is a whole different ball game from submitting proposals to societies for graduate student or even postdoc funding. There are so many rules to follow when you go through an institution, and no one sits you down and explains it all to you – you have to figure it out as you go. That was very time-consuming and exhausting the first time I submitted a proposal to NSF as a new PI! I would advise all new PIs to give yourself weeks (literally) to figure out how to do your submissions, and identify your grant support people early on, as they will be critical to your success.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

I see my graduate students as partners and collaborators. My goal is to help them be successful on a path that will lead to the happiest and most fulfilling life possible, whatever that means for each of them. For some graduate students it may be pursuing a career in academia, while for others it might mean working for the national park service, or pursuing a career as an artist or writer. Success as a mentor, to me, means that my students are happy and healthy, above everything else, and that they trust me to always be on their side and be an advocate for them.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution meeting was Snowbird in 2013, and it was totally different than the conferences I had attended before, which were more organismally-focused. I was really amazed to hear theoretical talks by well-known people in the field, and also to hear developers of the software I used every day talking about flaws in their programs and how they were improving them. It gave me a deep sense of this field as constantly evolving, because for the first time I was hearing in real time about how the methods, tools, and even theory that we use are constantly being tweaked. That was a profound realization for me, that evolution as a science is a living, constantly changing thing.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I am active on Twitter, and I try to do local science outreach events as often as I can. I’ve been involved with science events for Girl Scouts in my community, and with an event called “Talk Science with Her” that gives the public an opportunity to chat with a bunch of women scientists in various fields (at a local brewery, which is great!).

How do you think evolutionary research benefits society? I think evolutionary research has profound lessons to teach us about life on earth and our relationship to other living things, both genealogically and philosophically. The major insight of evolution for humanity, to me, is that we are not some pinnacle or ultimate expression of progress. We are the same as every other organism on this planet – we have been evolving just as long, and by exactly the same set of processes, as an amoeba or toadstool. We are not above them. If we could embrace this principle and make it a way of life, it might go a long way toward halting the destruction of the planet that our species seems hell-bent on.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

First and foremost: USE A CALENDAR. I know people in academia who don’t, and I don’t know how they survive day to day! Calendars are essential for me, and I practice a variation on the “one-hour workday”. I block off time in my calendar in one–three hour blocks, several times a week, that I label “research”. I do this at the start of every semester, when I know what the fixed events in my weekly schedule will be, and then I do not schedule anything over those blocks of time, ever. I force myself to use them for exactly what their label is – research – and usually those end up being the only times I get anything research-related done. In my first year as a PI, I blocked an entire day of the week for this purpose, but that was a disaster. It was far too easy to get to my office in the morning, look at the calendar, and say “I have a whole day to work! I can just spend a little while catching up on email…” and before I knew it the whole day had passed on menial tasks that were important, but definitely were not primary research. The one to several hour block works infinitely better, in my experience.

Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

I love In Defense of Plants – it’s a blog plus audio and video content, including interviews with plant scientists, and it covers a huge range of fascinating topics about plants!

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I’m an avid reader. I try to read every day, and it contributes tremendously to my mental health. I love fiction and how novels help you to explore other places and perspectives than your own. I read at night, before bed, and paper books only – I’ve never been able to get into audiobooks or an e-reader. I love holding a physical book in my hands, and this also helps me to have screen-free time right before going to sleep, which research has shown can help improve the quality of sleep.

 

 Dryopteris dilatata

 

 

 

 

 Asplenium aethiopicum

 

 

 

 

 Sampling plants

 

 

 

 

Teaching study abroad


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Ricardo Mallarino
Assistant Professor
Department of Molecular Biology
Princeton University
Start date: 2018

PhD: Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University. Advisor: Dr. Arhat Abzhanov
Postdoc: Departments of Molecular & Cell Biology and Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University/Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Advisor: Dr. Hopi Hoekstra.

About the department:

I am an Assistant Professor in the Department of Molecular Biology at Princeton University. Princeton is a great place for starting a lab because the environment is very collegial and there are amazing people around. In addition, the campus is very compact, which creates lots of opportunities for interactions and interdisciplinary collaborations with people from other departments. My office and lab are located next to the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology building, which is key for me because my research is at the interphase between developmental biology and evolutionary biology.

About the research:

In my lab, we focus on uncovering the genetic and developmental mechanisms regulating form and structure during vertebrate development. We are particularly interested in understanding how developmental programs are modified during evolutionary time to produce the spectacular phenotypic diversity seen in nature. We combine the study of emerging model organisms, because of their diverse, naturally occurring, and ecologically relevant phenotypes, with traditional model species, because of the powerful molecular and genetic tools available, to explore questions relating to patterning and the evolution of novelty in the mammalian skin. We use a variety of approaches, including experimental embryology, transcriptomics, and comparative genomics to uncover gene function and understand mechanisms of evolutionary change.

How have you prepared to be a PI?

Other than making sure I have an exciting set of questions and projects to get the lab started, I have gotten advice from a lot of people. I am lucky to know many people that run successful labs, where people are productive and happy, so I have made a big effort to talk to them about their experience. I usually ask them about the things that worked and, more importantly, about those that didn’t. There is no universal recipe, so I like to get many different points of view and then decide what is best for me. In addition to this, I took the EMBO lab management course and found it quite useful.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

Yes! I look for people that are naturally driven, motivated, and excited about science because I think those skills are a bit hard to teach. Since our work is interdisciplinary, I am interested in bringing together people with complementary backgrounds and skills so that we all benefit and learn from each other. For example, one of my postdocs is an amazing computational biologist who wants to learn experimental embryology whereas another one is a superb developmental biologist who wants to learn genomic approaches. Although their projects are very different, they are working together and helping each other.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

I published my first Evolution paper in 2005! I was a research assistant at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) before starting grad school and I was lucky enough to work with Chris Jiggins on Ithomiine butterflies. It was one of the best experiences of my life and what made me decide to pursue a PhD in biology.

Do you teach evolution?

I will begin co-teaching an introductory undergraduate class for non-science majors, and my lectures will cover a lot of the key concepts in evolutionary biology. I see it as a huge (and fun) responsibility because this is the only science class some of these students will ever take at Princeton, so I have to make sure they are well-informed and have a good understanding of the most relevant concepts. After all, some of these students may go on to become lawyers, politicians, and policy makers and will likely end up making decisions that affect all of us. One of the most exciting aspects of this is that I am co-teaching the class with Eric Wieschaus and Bonnie Bassler, two of my scientific heroes, so I am looking forward to learning from them!

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

The same advice that I got before I started my PhD: pick a project that you like so much that, when everything is failing (e.g., you are stuck on a lab technique that doesn’t work, you realized you had the wrong plasmid sent and you lost months, your negative control behaves like your experimental sample, etc.), you still want to get into the lab and figure out what is happening because you are really excited about the answer (this also goes for postdocs).

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Be creative and work as hard as you can to carve your own path, but take breaks and have a life outside the lab (this also goes for grad students). Also, find a supportive mentor – it will make a huge difference.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I wanted to be a professional tennis player and was involved a very rigorous training regime until I was about 14. At that point, I realized I wasn’t as good as the top players from my generation, so I decided to stay in school and focus on science.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I have an amazing wife and two young daughters who keep me busy when I am not at work. We like to hang out together and do different things, from going on bike rides, to visiting museums, to playing sports. They are the engine of my life and the reason I get out of bed every morning (I should say that my younger daughter is also the reason why I have to get out of bed most nights).

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

Text: Society for the Study of Evolution Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution Program. Applications due January 29, 2024. Background is a blue and orange abstract painting.

ABOUT | HOW TO APPLY | SELECTION CRITERIAUDE EVENTS | BE A MENTOR

About

The Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution (UDE) program sends undergraduate students to the annual Evolution meeting, the joint meeting of the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE), the Society of Systematic Biologists (SSB), and the American Society of Naturalists (ASN). The program is co-sponsored by the participating societies. This year, the three societies will meet with the European Society for Evolutionary Biology for the 3rd Joint Congress on Evolutionary Biology in Montreal, Canada.

At the meeting, students will (i) present a poster, (ii) receive mentoring from graduate students, postdocs, and faculty, and (iii) participate in a career-oriented 'Undergraduate Futures in Evolutionary Biology' panel and discussion
. Each selected awardee receives:

  • Conference registration
  • Round-trip airfare
  • Accommodations (double occupancy)
  • A $200 meal stipend*
  • Ticket to the Super Social

*Note: The meal stipend will be provided as a reimbursement after the meeting.
 

How to Apply

The application deadline is January 29, 2024 and decisions will be announced in February. Applications are welcomed from all undergraduates, and the admissions goal is to create a diverse pool of students.

Applications consist of:

  • Title, author line, and abstract of the poster to be presented by the undergraduate.
  • A one-page statement of academic interests and career goals, including how attending the Evolution meeting will help meet these goals.
  • A letter of recommendation from the undergraduate's research advisor. The letter should indicate whether the student plans to attend graduate school, medical school, or has other plans.

Submit the application using this form. The letter of recommendation must be submitted in PDF format via email to Dr. Richard Kliman (education@evolutionsociety.org).

Green apply now button.

Deadline: Monday, January 29, 2024
 
 

Selection Criteria

  • Applications are not limited to students residing in the country hosting the Evolution meeting. 
  • Participants will be selected to create a diverse cohort along multiple demographic axes.
  • Students demonstrating a need for funds to attend will be given preference. Those students without access to travel funds from their institutions or their research advisor's research budget will be chosen over those who have significant support.
  • Students must be registered undergraduates or very recent graduates (i.e., having finished classes during the winter or spring quarter/semester before the meeting).
  • Students preparing to attend graduate school in ecology, evolutionary biology, or related fields will be given priority over students planning to attend medical school.

All awardees will be required to attend the entire meeting to maximize their participation.

Previous award recipients are not eligible to receive the award again.

An awardee who requires a visa to travel to the meeting location (Montréal, Canada) may be unable to obtain one in time for the 2024 meeting. If this appears likely at the time of award notification, the awardee will be given the option to defer their participation to the 2025 meeting.

Awardees will make travel arrangements as communicated to them by email from the Education and Outreach Committee, and they will be expected to attend all UDE events (see below). 
 
 

Undergraduate Events at Evolution 2024

The Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution program will host three conference events that all UDE recipients will be expected to attend. More information will be available during conference registration.

  • Undergraduate Professional Development Workshop*
  • A "welcome" event during the opening reception
  • A social event during the meeting (e.g., ice cream social)

*The Professional Development event is open to ANY attending undergraduates or post-baccalaureates, regardless of award status/eligibility, but we kindly request you sign up in advance.
 
 

Volunteer as a Mentor

We are also looking for graduate students, postdocs and faculty members who would like to serve as mentors to the undergraduate awardees during the meeting. Mentors meet with pairs of students and attend talks with them, introduce them to colleagues, network and generally make the meeting a welcoming place for them. Mentoring is available to non-awardee students as well, depending on how many mentors sign up. Although costs are not covered for mentors, it is a rewarding experience. Those interested in serving as a mentor can indicate this during meeting registration. Questions may be directed to Dr. Richard Kliman (education@evolutionsociety.org). NOTE: Mentors need to be available to have lunch with their mentees on either the first or second full day of the meeting. 




View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Scott A. Taylor
Assistant Professor
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
University of Colorado Boulder
https://www.colorado.edu/lab/taylor/
Start date: August 2016

PhD: Queen’s University, Kingston Ontario. Advisor: Dr. Vicki Friesen.
Postdoc: Cornell Lab of Ornithology / Cornell University, Ithaca NY. Advisor, Dr. Irby Lovette

About the department:

Home to a large Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department (EBIO), the University of Colorado Boulder supports a diverse collection of faculty researching ecology and evolution. The EBIO graduate program is collegial and high-achieving and provides advanced training in a wide variety of biological disciplines including evolutionary genetics and ecology, behavior, landscape and community ecology, morphology, and systematics. Weekly seminars from both external scholars and graduate students in the EBIO program contribute to a dynamic and engaging environment. I am an assistant professor within the EBIO Department.

About the research:

Research in my lab applies genomics and field experiments to natural hybrid zones and closely related taxa in order to investigate the genetic architecture of reproductive isolation—the hallmark of speciation—and the genetic bases of traits relevant to speciation. This research also provides insight into the impacts of anthropogenic change, including climate change, on species distributions, interactions, and evolution.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

The biggest challenge for me so far has been time management. The additional duties and obligations that accompany a faculty position, versus being a postdoc, are interesting and fun, but finding the time to create and teach new courses, mentor multiple graduate students and postdocs, and write grants and manuscripts has been challenging.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

The biggest surprise for me so far about being a new PI is that, although I have more to do, and a larger variety of things to do, than I ever have in my academic career I am less stressed out than I was as an undergraduate student, during my PhD, or as a postdoc. If nothing else, I suppose I’ve gotten much better at managing stress effectively.

How have you prepared to be a PI?

Prior to becoming a PI, I took advantage of opportunities to teach and design courses, to mentor undergraduate and graduate students, and to read literature about both mentoring and Diversity and Inclusion in STEM. I feel like those experiences have helped me prepare to be a PI, but that I would have also benefited from some training in personnel management and finance.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

Prior to joining the lab, potential new lab members are provided with a guidelines and expectations document that clearly describes my expectations of them and what they should expect from me. This document has been developed in consultation with my lab group. Beyond being very up front about how our lab operates, I make sure to talk to new lab members about what they want to achieve and how they operate in group / lab settings.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

I am not currently recruiting. When I am, I look for hard working students who want to be part of an inclusive and dynamic team.

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I became an SSE member in 2008 prior to attending my first SSE conference in Minnesota.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career? Being an SSE member has provided me the opportunity to connect with amazing people who have become friends and collaborators. I remember feeling very intimidated at my first SSE conference, but since then have been able to forge productive collaborations, find postdoctoral opportunities, and make great friends by being involved with SSE and by attending meetings.

How did your first Evolution Meeting affect your career?

My first evolution meeting was in 2008. It was the first big meeting I attended as a graduate student and I remember being very very overwhelmed, but also really excited to be surrounded by dynamic scientists doing interesting work. I couldn’t imagine then that I would eventually look forward to attending the meeting so that I could catch up with friends and colleagues.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

Yes! The second paper I published as a postdoc at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology was in Evolution. The review process was thorough and I was happy with the end product and very excited to publish my first paper in the journal.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I worked as a naturalist for many years as an undergrad and during the year I took off between by PhD and my postdoc. I love giving public seminars about natural history and evolution and take advantage of opportunities to do so even as a new faculty member. Most recently I have given talks at birding conventions and for environmental groups.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

I teach populations genetics and I think the hardest concept to teach is coalescent theory. It is intuitive once you understand it, but when you present it to someone who has never thought about it before it takes some time for them to wrap their heads around it.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

I would also suggest blocking out writing time (a full day if you can manage it) and make sure that you only respond to emails a couple of times a day. Email can completely take over your life.

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

On The Origin of Species.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Publish early and aim to tell a story with the publications you produce during your degree. Don’t aim for least publishable units, but make sure you get experience publishing early so that you aren’t daunted by it at the end of your degree.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Work hard and enjoy this special time.

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

Prior to the beginning of a talk I was giving at an ASN meeting at Asilomar the power went out. I gave my talk walking around the room holding my computer to a really engaged group. The only talk award I’ve ever won was for that talk!

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I was a competitive figure skater.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Katie McGhee
Assistant Professor
Department of Biology
Sewanee: The University of the South
http://katiemcghee.strikingly.com
Start date: Fall 2015

PhD: Department of Biological Sciences, Florida State University; advisor: Dr. Joseph Travis
Postdoc: Department of Animal Biology, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana; advisor: Dr. Alison Bell
Visiting Postdoc: Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, UK; advisors: Behavioural Ecology Group (hosts: Drs. Rebecca Kilner and Nick Davies)

About the department:

The University of the South is a liberal arts college with fewer than 1800 undergraduate students. I teach multiple classes every semester but there are usually fewer than 20 students in each. The University sits on the Cumberland plateau in Tennessee and is surrounded by over 10,000 acres of wilderness owned by the University with lots of hiking and biking trails.

About the research:

I am a behavioral ecologist interested in the role parental effects have in shaping offspring behavior. I study how the stress that parents experience during their lives, such as predator encounters, affects the behavior of their offspring in the future. For example, is an offspring’s reaction to predators affected by their mother’s experience with predators during pregnancy or egg production? I use a variety of fish species in my research because they are easy to manipulate and observe in the lab, and they are just super fun to watch!

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI?

Adjusting to a small undergraduate-only liberal arts college has been challenging. All of my previous experiences had been with large research-centered universities, even as an undergraduate. Without a graduate program and with a large emphasis on meaningful interactions with students and interactive teaching, I have had to change my approach to teaching as well as research. It has been rewarding in many ways and I have realized that I can make a huge difference in student lives. But it has also been challenging to keep an active large-scale research program moving forward. There isn’t the continuity that graduate students would bring and research often progresses in fits and starts depending on the undergraduates I can recruit to my lab. I have had to adjust my expectations for research and continually have to work on not beating myself up for slow progress.

How do you approach mentoring with students?

As a graduate student, all of the students in the lab would laugh about meetings with our advisor (Joe Travis). During the meeting, Joe would tell you that things you had done were wrong and you needed to do more work, but somehow, you ended up leaving the meeting super excited about your project and positive about yourself. It is a magical skill. I try to keep this in mind when I mentor students – correct the mistakes and guide them but always have them leave our meeting feeling good about themselves and the amazing things they have accomplished. For undergraduates, this is particularly important - one overly-critical interaction and they could abandon science altogether! I know that eventually developing a thick skin is important, but before that, we need to give students a safe place to fail, learn, and gain some confidence in their abilities.

Did you ever have something go wrong while teaching?

While teaching an outdoor behavioral ecology lab on bird foraging in my first semester at Sewanee, I went into anaphylactic shock after being stung by several yellow jackets. I had been stung by wasps and bees in the past so I had not been concerned when I was stung during the lab, but within 2 minutes, I was unconscious (my throat did not close). Luckily one of my students had EMT training. He recognized the reaction and knew what to do. My students had to contact the police and carry me to the road since we were on a trail in the forest. I was very lucky and the students were wonderful, but this was certainly not the lab I had intended! Needless to say, they all got 100% on that lab.

Do you have a funny story to share from your first Evolution meeting?

I attended my first evolution meeting as a beginning graduate student when I was doing my Master’s. Because I had barely finished collecting my data, my poster was done at the last minute. I had never made a poster before and ended up having a variety of technical challenges, one of which was a giant mysterious “ F ” that had appeared in the middle of my poster. I could not get rid of it! But I didn’t have time to wait for tech support so it got printed as it was. The poster session went fine despite the obnoxious “ F ” in the middle and the jokes about the “F” being a grade on my poster. Interestingly, some people didn’t notice the mistake, or they were too kind to say anything to a super nervous graduate student. I learned a valuable lesson about never trying to do a poster in a hurry!

What do you enjoy in your free time?

Hiking, mountain biking, and outdoor adventures with my mud-obsessed children. Sneaking lentils and beans into yummy baked goodies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page
Add text here...

View full page

View the Handbook for SSE Council and Committee Members here.

View handbook button


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

 Daniel J. Field
University Lecturer
Department of Earth Sciences
University of Cambridge
www.danieljfield.com
Start date: October 2018

PhD: Department of Geology & Geophysics, Yale University. Advisor: Prof. Jacques Gauthier
Fellowship: 50th Anniversary Prize Fellowship in the Milner Centre for Evolution at the University of Bath

About the department:

I am a lecturer (assistant professor) in evolutionary paleobiology in the Department of Earth Sciences at Cambridge. Because my research is specimen-based and focuses on vertebrate evolution, I maintain strong links with several other institutions within the university, such as the Department of Zoology, University Museum of Zoology, and the Sedgwick Museum of Earth Sciences. One unusual aspect of my job at Cambridge is that the university is made up of 31 autonomous colleges, so in addition to my ‘normal’ departmental job of research and lecturing, I am also a fellow of Christ’s College, where I teach small group supervisions. Christ’s College is an exciting multi-disciplinary community, and also happens to be where Charles Darwin studied as an undergraduate.

About the research:

My research is mostly focused on the macroevolutionary history of birds. I am interested in how the distinctive characteristics of birds arose among Mesozoic dinosaurs (e.g., feathers, warm-bloodedness, toothless beak), as well as how, when, and where modern avian biodiversity originated. I also occasionally address similar questions in other groups of vertebrates, and have worked on sharks, snakes, turtles, non-avian dinosaurs, and whales.

How do you approach mentoring new lab members?

Vertebrate paleontology is an exciting subdiscipline of evolutionary biology, but the perceived rarity of key specimens and a challenging job market can sometimes lead to an unwelcoming environment for young researchers. The most important lesson for students joining my research group is to be kind and stay positive, even in the face of challenges such as these. Unraveling mysteries from the fossil record is a privilege, and if you stay excited about your science and maintain a positive attitude, things will work out well!

When was your first Evolution meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution meeting was in Raleigh in 2014, and it changed my career forever. Before then I had mostly limited myself to paleontology conferences, so attending Evolution allowed me to meet many amazing comparative biologists and evolutionary ornithologists for the first time. These included legends like Scott Edwards, but also many brilliant young researchers who are all rising stars and wonderful people (Deren Eaton, Shane DuBay, Jessica Oswald, Ryan Terrill, Caroline Judy, and Ben Winger, to name a few). At that meeting I received the W.D. Hamilton Award for my talk on the evolution of the avian shoulder joint, which was a massive confidence boost midway through my PhD. It was really validating to learn that SSE clearly valued paleontology and appreciated its relevance to evolutionary biology, and humbling to compete for the prize alongside many great researchers representing a huge breadth of research subjects.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

Paleontology lends itself really well to public outreach (it’s often said that fossils are the lens through which many children first experience the thrill of science). With that in mind, I have prioritized participating in public engagement opportunities throughout my career, ranging from museum tours, public talks, school visits, media outreach, and occasionally writing articles for public audiences. I love talking to people about the evolution of birds and the fossil record, and think these efforts can help improve science literacy in the general public on subjects beyond paleontology and evolution.

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

I read some inspiring books on evolutionary biology and the fossil record as an undergraduate, including Neil Shubin’s Your Inner Fish and Sean Carroll’s Endless Forms Most Beautiful. Thinking back, the book that influenced me the most at that point was probably Dry Store Room No. 1 by Richard Fortey, which describes the early stages of his career as a paleontology curator at one of the world’s great museums, the Natural History Museum in London. Fortey conveys such awe and excitement about uncovering forgotten wonders within the Natural History Museum’s collections, and anyone who has had the privilege of doing collections-based research will understand the emotions he describes. I feel extremely lucky to get to follow in Fortey’s footsteps and frequently work within natural history museums myself, and think anyone curious about specimen-based research should definitely give Dry Store Room a read.

What do you enjoy doing in your spare time?

I am a keen birder and wildlife photographer, and love tracking down new species in exciting corners of the world. I also love playing sports, and have recently joined basketball and ice hockey teams at Cambridge (that’s not always possible in the UK, and is very welcome for a Canadian expat like me!).

 

 

 

Conducting field work in Iceland.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A selection of Field's wildlife photography.

View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Fay-Wei Li
Assistant Professor
Boyce Thompson Institute
www.fernway.net
Start date: January 2017

PhD: Department of Biology, Duke University; advisor: Dr. Kathleen Pryer
Postdoc: Department of Biology, Duke University; advisor: Dr. Kathleen Pryer
Postdoc: Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley; Advisor: Dr. Carl Rothfels
Postdoc: Institute for Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich; Péter Szövényi
 
 

About the department:

I’m an assistant professor at Boyce Thompson Institute (BTI), which is an independent research institute on the Cornell campus. A wide variety of research is happening at BTI, most of which centered on plants. I also have a joint appointment in the Plant Biology Section at Cornell University.

About the research:

We are broadly interested in the evolutionary processes at the gene, genome, and microbiome levels that shaped the plant diversity. We mostly focus on “seed-free” plants (ferns, lycophytes, and bryophytes), and anything that has a weird biology. The main project right now is on the diversity, ecology, and genetics of hornwort-cyanobacteria symbiosis.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

The most stressful part was getting funding for sure. Whether or not I can keep my job clearly hinges on this, and the low funding rate drives the anxiety level up even further. After three declines, I finally got one awarded last year. I think I’m calmer now (?).

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

It’s not ok to be the first one in line for free food : (

How have you prepared to be a PI?

While I was a PhD student at Duke, Cathy Rushworth and Mohamed Noor had a course on exactly this topic – how to be a PI. It was eye-opening for me, and made me aware of implicit bias, managing expectation, different styles of mentoring, … etc. I feel very glad, almost every day, that I took this class. I’m also fortunate to have amazing mentors from whom I have learnt a great deal; I often find myself thinking, “what would they do in this situation?”

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution meeting was in 2014 in Raleigh, NC. Phylogenomics started to take off around that time, and it was exhilarating to be there and learn all the new technologies, new methods, and new possibilities.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I love doing outreach! BTI has a very strong and active communication department that has connected me with many outreach opportunities. For example, for the opening night of Sciencenter’s Wicked Plants exhibition, I presented a story of deadly ferns to 50 or so kids and their parents. To make sure those 5-year-olds can understand, I ended up spending way more time preparing for this talk than for my regular research seminars. Last week, I also participated in the Science on Screen program at a local movie theater. Before the screening of “Little Shop of Horrors”, I talked about the fascinating world of parasitic and carnivorous plants, while the audience devoured their popcorn.

What is your favorite app?

iNaturalist hands down. The computer AI for species identification is remarkable. I was able to learn the new flora in upstate New York rather quickly by using this app.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I used to be a tank commander.

Plants that Li's lab are currently studying.

 

Li igniting Lycopodium spores at Cornell University's Judy's Day Family Learning Festival.

 

Li presenting at the Wicked Plants event at the Sciencenter members' night.

 

Li presenting at the Science on Screen event showing "Little Shop of Horrors."

View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Rachel Germain
Assistant Professor
Department of Zoology & the Biodiversity Research Centre
University of British Columbia
www.germainlab.weebly.com
Start date: January 2019

PhD: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto; advisor: Dr. Benjamin Gilbert.
Postdoc: Departments of Botany and Zoology, University of British Columbia; advisor: mostly an independent postdoc, affiliated with Dr. Amy Angert’s lab.

About the department:

I work out of the Biodiversity Research Centre (BRC) at the University of British Columbia, in the Department of Zoology. The BRC is a physical space that houses researchers from multiple departments all with common interests in understanding the causes and consequences of biodiversity, both from ecological and evolutionary perspectives. In many ways, the BRC functions more like a synthesis centre than a traditional department. It’s a dynamic, fun environment for research.

About the research:

My lab studies the ecology and evolution of species coexistence in spatially-structured landscapes – how historical abiotic environments, competitive interactions, and dispersal have shaped how species interact with each other and their environments, and the outcome of those interactions for the distribution of biodiversity.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

The number one question most prospective graduate students ask is, “What’s your mentoring style”? In my mind, the answer to that question depends on the student. Every individual has unique strengths, individualized goals, and new skills to be developed. Every individual learns differently and finds different levels and forms of feedback most effective (which also changes with career stage). My job as a mentor is to identify those strengths, goals, and learning opportunities – to get to know the student well enough to figure out what kind of mentorship would work best for them given their goals, and to work as much on further building up existing strengths as anything else. No two students should leave my lab having had the exact same experience or skill set.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution meeting was only recently, in August of 2018 in Montpellier. As a community ecologist, the Ecological Society of America meetings are my usual go-to, which is a real shame because there clearly are so many research parallels between ecological principles evolutionary biologists use and the evolutionary principles ecologists use – I hope to attend many more Evolution meetings in the future to strengthen these links first for myself, integrating them more fully into my lab’s research, and then hopefully to biodiversity science as a field. Let’s get out of our silos!

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

The first course I’ve taught at UBC is a second year Fundamentals in Ecology course all Science students are required to take. Although the course covers a broad range of ecological processes (e.g., island biogeography, metapopulation dynamics, species coexistence), throughout, the course covers how evolutionary hypotheses relate to the ecological concepts. As examples, we invoke global-scale macroevolution and biogeography to explain latitudinal gradients of biodiversity, character displacement in the context of niche differentiation, and phylogenetic relatedness to explain patterns of species coexistence. I also like to point out areas where more integration between ecology and evolution is needed – that many theories and concepts in ecology have recently been revised in the literature, and the opportunity that exists to integrate these new ideas into evolutionary thinking. The biggest challenge to student learning is the complexity that comes with the contingency that ecology and evolution impose on each other – that unlike in other courses with a clearly defined answer, in ecology, the answer can really change if evolution is happening. It certainly makes marking harder if students try and consider all possibilities!

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Don’t see yourself as “just a student”. Young researchers often have a fresh perspective and question assumptions that someone more senior might overlook. Everyone starts somewhere and has something to contribute. Reach out to people. Take up space. Want to meet Dr. Joe Shmoe? Email them! Arrange to meet them at Evolution. Have a neat idea of how two research themes might align? Organize a symposium! Have a research idea and want to collaborate with a new research group? Pitch it to them! Don’t be afraid to fail – if it doesn’t work out, you’ll learn from it. And ultimately, you’ll emerge with memorable experiences, a killer CV, a solid network of colleagues, and ideas to keep your research program moving full steam ahead.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

Not sure if I would call this a mistake vs. a lack of experience at the time, but there’s a lesson here: the #1 thing I used to be the worst at was giving research talks. I would get up there, turn red, shake, draw a blank, stress about it for weeks before and after. I once flat out stopped talking and left half way through my slides. Now this is interesting because today I’d say giving talks is high on the list of things I’m very good at – I actually enjoy giving them! It’s a great rush. I’ve won awards for it. So how’d things turn around? In my case, I took very active steps to get over this problem. First, I signed up for nearly every opportunity to speak that came up. Second, I’d give myself challenges – for example, in my PhD I gave a full research talk to the graduate student community using slides I had not looked at in at least a year (I warned the audience first). This challenged me to think on my feet in possibly one of the most uncomfortable, public ways I could think of – anything after that felt less uncomfortable by comparison. I think the important lesson is not to avoid or run from things that make you uncomfortable – embrace and overcome them! Champion them! You can do it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Josef Uyeda
Assistant Professor of Evolutionary Biology
Department of Biological Sciences
Virginia Polytechnic and State University
https://www.uyedalab.com/
Start date: August 2017

PhD: Department of Zoology (now Integrative Biology), Oregon State University; Advisor: Dr. Stevan J Arnold.
Postdoc: Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies (IBEST), University of Idaho; Advisor: Dr. Luke Harmon.

 

 

About the department:

I am an Assistant Professor of Evolutionary Biology in the Department of Biological Sciences at Virginia Polytechnic and State University and affiliated with the Global Change Center, an interdisciplinary center that unites faculty from across campus interested in the effects of global change.

About the research:

My research seeks to understand the drivers of phenotypic evolution at the macroevolutionary scale. I try to unite phylogenetic comparative models with knowledge, data and processes at different biological scales. For example, how can we integrate and reconcile our understanding of trait evolution from microevolutionary studies with macroevolutionary models? Can our models better reflect anatomical, developmental and functional dependencies underlying phenotypic change? How can we make better inferences about the history of life? My hope is that these efforts will lead to stronger inferences of the causal mechanisms that determine when and why adaptation succeeds or fails over million-year timescales.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/will you choose new lab members?

Yes! The primary characteristics I'm looking for in new graduate students are curiosity, creativity and the ability to ask good questions. I also value students who have demonstrated resilience, grit and determination to reach their goals and welcome students from diverse backgrounds.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career? Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

I've been to every Evolution Meeting since 2008 in Minneapolis and don't plan on missing any anytime soon. It's hard to overstate how important the meeting has been to my development as a scientist. My first meeting was the summer after I started grad school. It was my first talk at a national conference and also eventually became my first publication in Evolution, “Drift promotes speciation by sexual selection” with Steve Arnold, Paul Hohenlohe and Louise Mead. Years later, Doug Futuyma and I were having dinner and he said to the table that he thought "Josef and Ernst Mayr were exactly right" when referencing the paper. I asked him if I could put that quote as the header of my CV and/or as my epitaph, but I'll put it here instead.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

Yes, I teach a 200-level evolutionary biology course of around 120 students. I try to emphasize evolution as a statistical process and encourage quantitative reasoning. The math that the students do is of course much easier than the math they do in many other courses and for the major. However, the hardest concept to teach is translating between measurements and models and the biology they are meant to represent.

What concept blows students’ minds?

I borrow an exercise from Thomas Hansen where I use back of the napkin calculations and the breeder's equation to have students determine how much evolution we'd expect if selection were of typical strength and continued in one direction for a few thousand years. We use class data on the heritability of human height. This year, we estimated that consistent selection for increasing height and constant genetic variance would result in a population of humans that averaged 117.5 meters tall after only 1,000 generations. It helps the student see that microevolution is more than capable of explaining biodiversity, and that often, the existence of stasis is the real mystery in evolution.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

No idea, but whatever one does, they probably should avoid being like me.

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

The top of my list for the past year has been The Book of Why by Judea Pearl and Dana MacKenzie. The book covers how we study causation in science, both how it was treated historically as well as the rapidly expanding toolkit of causal modeling. Few books have so profoundly changed how I think about science. On top of that, it offers a fresh perspective on many of the familiar figures in evolutionary biology, making it an enjoyable read for our community.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

One piece of advice that always stuck with me was that people are most satisfied with their jobs not when they're doing the thing they enjoy most, but when they put their best skills to problems they think matter. Not a skill that is better than what everybody else can do, just whatever an individual thinks they do best. I think this formula is really powerful, and has helped me in my own career. Research can be often frustrating and disappointing, rejection is common, and imposter syndrome is ubiquitous. Finding value and purpose in what you do on a daily basis can help sustain you long term through the down days.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I didn't believe in evolution all the way up until senior year of high school. In fact, I went door to door distributing anti-evolution literature and I participated in debates on the creationist side. I would like to think this gives me some perspective on how minds get changed. I often hear from people that extreme evolution or climate change deniers that are not worth arguing with, and that they are a lost cause. That stings. I always emphasize to people that no one changes their mind during an argument--that's just not how the human mind works. Having a person realize you're right with a sudden, satisfying epiphany will never happen, but that doesn't mean it's not worthwhile. Of course, debating die-hard deniers is not for everyone. But we shouldn't discourage it either! If you go into the discussion with realistic expectations, empathy, respect, and work toward developing personal relationships, you may be rewarded--I am immensely thankful for the people who spent the time to talk with me in my own journey.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

A lot of my research is computational these days, but I became a biologist because of my love of the natural world. I have always enjoyed herping, birding and botanizing, and these are still my favorite hobbies. I also love to garden and grow carnivorous plants.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Lauren O'Connell
Assistant Professor
Department of Biology
Stanford University
oconnell.stanford.edu
Start date: August 2017

PhD: University of Texas at Austin; Advisor: Hans Hofmann.
Postdoc Harvard University; Advisor: Andrew Murray. Bauer Fellow at Harvard; Advisors: Alex Schier, Catherine Dulac, Naomi Pierce, and Jon Clardy.

About the department:

My department is truly integrative across ecology, evolution, and cellular and molecular biology and challenges me to think about my work in organismal biology from different perspectives.

About the research:

My lab studies how genetic and environmental factors contribute to biological diversity and adaptation. We are particularly interested in understanding (1) how behavior evolves through changes in brain function and (2) how animal physiology evolves through repurposing existing cellular components.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

The biggest challenge I have faced is the large amount of administrative things required of a PI. It is a struggle to protect my science time.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

The freedom in teaching that I'm allowed. I can teach about anything and my department is incredibly supportive.

How have you prepared to be a PI?

I ran my own lab straight out of my PhD as a Bauer Fellow at Harvard, which was great practice for leading a team of people towards a common scientific goal.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

Each person has different needs, and my job is to mentor people in a way that allows them to do their best science and maintains mental wellness. We discuss needs and expectations when they join the lab while completing an Individual Development Plan together.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

I choose lab members first by fit in the lab - I only hire collaborative people who are committed to fostering an inclusive environment and are interested in scientific outreach. Then I select based on scientific interests. I like hiring people who have slightly different interests than me, where we both are bringing different perspectives to a challenging problem.

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I became a lifetime member when I got my own lab, as evolution guides all the work that we do.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

Becoming a member gives me and my lab a supportive home community to share and receive feedback on our research.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution meeting was in 2016 in Austin Texas, my home state. My work had never been grounded in evolution prior to that conference, but it opened my eyes to the kind of research that I wanted to do.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I am active on science Twitter, where I have learned a lot from following other scientists at all stages and from diverse backgrounds and life experiences.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

I am teaching Evolution for the first time this next year!

Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

I run a program called the "Frogger School Program", where we give public school classrooms terraria with (non-toxic) poison frogs. We have developed curriculum that links the frogs to modules on ecology and evolution. We have also worked with the high school classrooms to conduct genuine scientific studies and take high school teachers with us to conduct studies in the field.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

Learn to say "No." Only say "Yes" to things that really matter to you. Protect your personal time and mental wellness.

What is your favorite app?

Twitter (;@alaurenoconnell)

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Your success in grad school is half about the science and half about the advisor. Choose a supportive advisor that promotes you and your science and prioritizes your wellbeing. The science you do in grad school does not determine the science you will do for the rest of your life.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Choose an advisor that promotes you and your ideas.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

I switched labs mid-way through grad school. I was in an abusive lab environment and I switched into a lab where my advisor, Hans Hofmann, was incredibly supportive.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I was raised on a farm off the grid in a religious cult. I didn't learn about Evolution until I was an undergraduate at Cornell. Everything in science made sense after that class.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I like hanging out with my daughters. I also enjoy watercolor and glassblowing in my free time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

C. Brandon Ogbunu
Assistant Professor
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Brown University
https://medium.com/ogplexus
Start date: July 2018

PhD: Yale University; Advisor: Paul E. Turner.
Postdoc Harvard University/Broad Institute; Advisor: Daniel L. Hartl.

About the department:

I am an Assistant Professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Brown University. I am also affiliated with the Center for Computational Molecular Biology, and carry trainer status in the Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biotechnology.

About the research:

I am broadly interested in evolutionary complex systems, often in the context of disease. My research aims to disentangle the complex interactions underlying disease phenomena across scales, ranging from the higher-order epistasis operating in drug resistance at the molecular level, to the many forces that craft epidemics at the population level.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Coming to the realization that you can't work with everyone, and that you have to grow at a certain pace. At first, everything seems interesting, and everyone appears like a potentially great collaborator, but there's only so many hours in a day.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

I've been surprised by the generosity of my senior colleagues, by how fast fields progress, and how tremendously talented so many young people are.

How have you prepared to be a PI?

I've been lucky to have been mentored by advisors who were excellent scientists, and kind people. I've tried to follow their basic template, much of it very basic professional advice: be respectful, be punctual, be gracious. Work hard, publish, and put love into your trainees.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

The most important initial lessons are not about science, but about being a good colleague, being transparent and collaborative. With those in place, I like to craft individual plans based on interests and personality. I like to keep it practical -- let's learn by analyzing a data set or building a model.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

I am always looking for kind, smart, collaborative people. My lab is question-driven more than organism-driven, which makes it easier for me to accommodate a wide range of personalities and talents. But a very important intangible to me is open-mindedness and a central belief that everyone should be able to participate in this scientific enterprise. Supporting diversity isn't a political stance that I adopt in my lab, but rather, is the guiding vision for how I aim to do this job.

I'm the son of a woman who would have been a better scientist than I, had she been given the same opportunities. I am looking for students and trainees like my mother.

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I've been a member since I was a postdoctoral fellow. It was the organization that appeared to have the broadest reach, and had an impressive array of activities and initiatives.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

It has greatly increased my professional reach and broadened my scientific family. It has also exposed me to a number of issues and discussions that I would not have been otherwise privy to.

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

I had the wrong computer adapter during the Portland meeting (2017), which delayed my presentation, shrinking my time from about 15 minutes to 5 minutes. Amazingly, not only did I squeeze my entire talk into 5 minutes, I had friends in the audience who told me that it was one of my better seminars! This taught me the power of communication: when efficient, you really can explain a lot in a little bit of time.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

I believe my first Evolution meeting was in Portland (2017). There I met a colleague named Rafael F. Guerrero who would become one of my closest collaborators.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

I do. It was an evolution experiment that was conducted by a postdoctoral fellow in the Turner Lab (Yale), and published in 2014. It was very exciting work, and a dream come true to publish a manuscript in Evolution. Even more, that work has formed the foundation for a lot of my current research.

If you could meet one other SSE member for the first time, who would it be and why?

Richard Lewontin. I used to see him in the hallway during my postdoc, but never had the courage to say hello. I've long admired him.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I've been lucky to be involved in outreach in many arenas. Most recently I was featured on the Emmy-Award-Winning web series "Finding Your Roots: The Seedlings." This show was a spinoff of the PBS series "Finding Your Roots," but featured middle school students. The central idea was to use the exploration of self--the genetic, genealogical and intentional--to increase participation and interest in STEM fields. I was the course instructor, and was amazed by the depth of the questions that they asked and how much they learned in such a short time.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

I have taught evolution. I think that the challenge--and fun--is in bridging the molecular to the macro.

Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

Many peculiarities of human evolution tend to fascinate students, such as sexual selection, human diversity, and the evolution of disease.

How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

Evolution is the one biological field that is equipped to offer ultimate explanations for complex phenomenon. Evolution is also an algorithm which can be applied in other paradigms. As we observed with the 2018 Nobel Prize in Chemistry (given to several applications of evolutionary reasoning in chemistry and chemical biology), evolutionary reasoning can help any number of scientists solve complex problems.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

When you first sit down at the start of a work day, take 10 minutes to go through notes, organize your mind. Similarly, at the end of a workday: go through what you accomplished, jot down any residual ideas.

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

I was introduced to Stephen Jay Gould in college. Without him, I wouldn't be in this profession, and I read everything he's ever written. More than any single idea, Gould taught me that writing is a powerful tool. And he made concepts in evolution so delightfully fun to read.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Read a lot, and read broadly. Be respectful of your senior colleagues, and generally focus on being helpful and courteous. Professionalism continues to be underrated as a professional tip. In a collaborative world, your colleagues really appreciate gracious, decent people.

Get feedback on your writing! Use writing centers and tutors.

And please -- learn statistics.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Realize early that you're on your own. Revel in the independence. Get coffee with everyone in the lab next door, whether they study what you study or not. You have no idea which ideas will change your career. Be modest -- you *feel* close to being a professor, but you have a long way to go (mentally & emotionally, even if not intellectually).

How was your first faculty meeting?

As with many at my stage, I sat tall in my chair, but was deathly afraid to speak.

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

Yes! Embarrassing typos. Missing notes. I think it’s best to just remember that it’s just a conversation. Have a conversation with the audience.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

I had entire projects collapse and fail. As sad as I was about this, this is what taught me that science really is a "hustle" -- you have to be crafty, creative and dynamic.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I'm a former boxing instructor, and boxing journalist. I used to be a data consultant for UNICEF (child health and infectious disease).

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

exercise, reading science-fiction, listening to hip-hop.

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Kathleen Gray Ferris
Assistant Professor
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Tulane University
https://kathleengferristulane.wordpress.com
Start date: July 2018

PhD: Duke University; Advisor: John Willis.
Postdoc UC Berkeley; Advisor: Michael Nachman. Center for Population Biology Post-doctoral Fellow, UC Davis, Advisors: Johanna Schmitt, Graham Coop, and Jeff Ross-Ibarra.

About the department:

I am currently a new Assistant Professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Tulane University. Tulane is a private research one institution located in one of the most beautiful cities in the country, New Orleans. Our department is very diverse with labs studying a wide range of topics from animal behavior to plant-microbe interactions.

About the research:

I’ve always been fascinated by three things: how things work, natural beauty, and storytelling. For me, evolutionary biology combines all three. To understand how the evolutionary story has unfolded, my lab combines quantitative genetics, population genomics, and field experiments to determine the genetic, phenotypic, and environmental basis of adaptation and speciation in Mimulus (Monkeyflowers). Projects in the lab focus on the genetic basis of local adaptation, parallel evolution, phenotypic plasticity, and traits under temporally varying selection using Mimulus laciniatus and Mimulus guttatus. We are particularly interested in how differences in leaf morphology, mating system, and phenology within and between species contribute to adaptation to harsh rocky environments. By combining genetic, experimental, and field methods we hope to gain a holistic understanding of the evolutionary narrative.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

My biggest challenge as a new PI has been the loneliness that comes with starting a new lab. For the first time in my career it was just me at the office every day, just me in the lab, just me making decisions. It can be isolating and overwhelming at first, but eventually it's freeing! Also it gets so much less lonely once you get that first person in the lab so I recommend hiring a technician asap!

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

The biggest surprise for me has been how much time and investment creating and teaching a new course takes. It really is a ton of work, but also very rewarding!

How have you prepared to be a PI?

Throughout my career I have done a lot of mentoring, public speaking, and grant writing. When I was a PhD student and post-doc I mentored undergraduates and high school students almost every semester. It was a great experience and helps me a lot now that my main day to day job is managing a group of people. I also started giving regular scientific talks and TAing early in graduate school so I became very comfortable with public speaking. Since teaching and communicating my research is a huge part of my job as a PI this comfort is really helpful. Lastly I started writing grants and applying for fellowships during my first year of graduate school and haven't stopped since. This is an essential skill now that I'm a PI.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

I aim to create a really positive work environment where lab members get along well and view each other as part of a team. I find that this is the most effective work environment for myself and most other people. When lab members feel comfortable communicating is when the most work gets done. I also want lab members to be independent, to feel ownership over their work, and yet know when to ask me or others for help. Overall I think that evolutionary biology research is and should be fun!

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

Yes I am currently recruiting PhD students and post-docs. I'm looking for enthusiastic, friendly, and hard working lab members who are curious, intrinsically motivated and like working with other people. I am also looking for people interested in the genetics of adaptation and speciation who have had prior research experience in at least one of those areas.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

I have always loved being connected to SSE. It is my natural intellectual home. You are my people.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

I went to my first Evolution conference as a second year PhD student. It had a huge impact on me. I gave my first talk that year and I was in the slot right before Joe Felsenstein. This meant that halfway through my first talk the room, which had been relatively empty, starting filling up until there were hundreds of people there! Even though I know most of those people weren't there for me, it actually gave me a huge boost of confidence to know that so many people saw my first talk ever and that I didn't mess it up despite the interruption!

How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

Besides gaining a better understanding of the world's history and how the world works, I think that evolutionary biology is critical to human society's awareness of its place in the world. I believe understanding that all humans are pretty closely related to each other, and that all humans are related to every other living creature in the world by common descent makes people better stewards of each other and the planet as a whole. In short, I think that our evolutionary history is a key unifying concept for society.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

Ack! No. But I need some...

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

On the Origin of Species. An oldie but a goodie.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Treat graduate school like a job, not like school. Also always remember that you have agency and that if things aren't going well you can make a change and better your situation.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I have a bachelor’s degree in English Language and Literature and I enjoy creative writing, painting, and baking. I've even written a children's book called Sneaky Cephalopods which I'm now very slowly illustrating. I'm also slightly obsessed with Cephalopods...

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

Traveling, reading contemporary and classic literature, eating, and running!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

In an effort to be fiscally transparent to SSE members, our income and expenditures are summarized below. In addition, we are posting yearly financial reports that provide a more detailed summary of the Society’s income and expenditures.

View financial reports by year: 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022

Questions or comments should be directed to Courtney Murren, SSE Treasurer: treasurer [at] evolutionsociety.org.
 

Income

SSE’s income derives from three sources: dues and donations from members; revenue from our journals (Evolution and Evolution Letters); and returns on our investments. The income from these sources can vary from year to year. However, typical proportions are shown in the figure to the left, with more than half of our income in recent history derived from journal revenue.

In December 2023, SSE had 3,577 members.

SSE’s journal income comes from its contract with Oxford University Press, the publisher of Evolution and Evolution Letters. This income includes royalties, profit sharing, and page charges. Publishing in society journals supports society activities.

SSE’s investment income comes from its endowment. The endowment is managed for SSE by Vanguard (transitioning to Mercer) and overseen by the Treasurer and a Finance committee. In February 2021, SSE adopted a formal investment policy that includes a policy on ethical investing. This policy was developed by the Treasurer and Finance and Policy committees and received council approval. To ensure that the endowment can continue to provide income to SSE in the future, a current component of the financial policy is to spend no more than 3% of the endowment’s average value over the previous 3 years. The finance committee reviews the policy on an annual basis. Read the financial policy here.

 

Expenditures

Expenditures can be divided into two major categories: non-discretionary and discretionary. 

Non-discretionary expenditures are essential to the general functioning of the Society and represent approximately half of our annual expenditures. Without these expenditures, the Society would not be sustainable. Non-discretionary expenditures fall into two broad categories: 

Operating costs (~⅔ of non-discretionary budget) 

  • business office fees for accounting, membership management, and IT and website support
  • staff support (e.g., Communications manager)
  • stipends for officers
  • financial management fees
  • tax preparation fees 
  • insurance

Publication and editorial costs (~⅓ of non-discretionary budget)

  • editorial budgets for Evolution and Evolution Letters  
  • Managing editor  
  • Dryad data-archiving fees for articles in Evolution and Evolution Letters


Discretionary expenditures are for activities that support SSE’s mission (“the promotion of the study of organic evolution and the integration of various fields of science concerned with evolution”), and represent the other approximate half  of our annual expenditures. Most discretionary expenditures fall into one or more of the broad categories: 

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion expenditures 

Education and Outreach expenditures

Public Policy expenditures

Award expenditures

Professional Development expenditures


View full page

Text: 2024 R. C. Lewontin Early Award Deadline February 23, 12:00 PM Pacific on a green background.
 

About

The Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) is pleased to announce the 2024 Graduate Research Excellence Grant (GREG) R. C. Lewontin Award competition. These awards offer up to $2,500 USD to assist students in the early stages of their graduate programs. These grants are part of the Graduate Research Excellence Grants award program.

Eligibility

PhD students in their first two years of their program and Master's students in the first year of their program are eligible. Eligibility can be confirmed by the advisor or graduate director stating that the student is an early-stage doctoral student. Previous applicants to the GREG Rosemary Grant Advanced Award are no longer early in their programs, thus are ineligible to apply to the GREG R. C. Lewontin Early Award. 

Student applicants must be members of SSE, and are advised to join SSE, if not already members, as soon as possible to facilitate their applications.

Previous awardees of either GREG award may not re-apply. Previous applicants to the GREG R. C. Lewontin Award who were not selected for funding are welcome to re-apply if they still meet the other eligibility requirements. 

This award is not limited to students in the United States.

Students do not have to be enrolled in an evolutionary biology program to apply, but proposals must address a topic in evolutionary biology.

Please direct any questions about eligibility to communications@evolutionsociety.org.

Funding

Funding is not limited to any particular aspect of research (but see FAQs below). Funds can be used to collect preliminary data (to pursue additional sources of support) or to enhance the scope of their research beyond current funding limits (e.g. by visiting additional field sites, or working at other labs). Recipients are not required to use the awarded funds by a certain time, and may deviate from any timeline described in their proposal.

Students should confirm that the proposed work is outside the scope of other funding held by either the student or their advisor. 

Awards will range from $1,500 - $2,500 USD.

Indirect costs may not be charged to this award.
 
 

How to apply

Your research proposal, budget, and a letter from your advisor must be included in your application as a single file in .pdf format with one-inch margins (= 2.5 cm) and 12 point font. 

The file must include: 

  1. Research proposal, describing objectives, methods, significance, and schedule, (maximum two single-spaced pages including literature cited and any figures and tables);
  2. Budget (1 page; no justification necessary, just a clear budget);
  3. Confirmation of eligibility as a signed letter from the thesis advisor or graduate director. This should include confirmation that the applicant is in the first year of their Master's program or first two years of their PhD program.

    Note: This letter is *not* a letter of recommendation; only include the information requested.

    Sample letter:
    Dear Selection Committee,
    This letter confirms that [Student Name] is eligible for the SSE GREG R. C. Lewontin Early Award. I am [Student Name]’s supervisor. [Student Name] is in the [first or second year] of their [Master's or PhD] program.  
    Sincerely,
    [Advisor/Graduate Director Name]

 

Research Proposal Details

In your research proposal, focus on convincing the awards committee of the importance of the question, how the funds will allow you to reach certain objectives, and how these objectives fit into your overall thesis schedule, while also demonstrating that the research is sufficiently independent that funds from your mentor cannot be applied. 

Formatting Requirements:

  • Maximum 2 pages, including literature cited and any figures or tables. The budget and confirmation of eligibility can be on separate pages.
  • Single spaced
  • 12-point font
  • 1-inch margins

General proposal structure: 

Background 
  - Start with the big picture: What is the context of your proposed research? What is already known about this area of study?
  - Summarize previous research in this field: What findings will your work build upon? What are the gaps in our knowledge that your research will try to answer?

Research Objective 
- State your specific hypothesis: What is your research question? What will you learn from this study? How will it address a gap in our knowledge of this field?

Methods 
  - Data collection: What data will you collect, and how?
  - Data analysis: How will you analyze your data?
  - Connection to research objective: How will collecting these data allow you to answer your research question?

Significance/Impact 
  - How does this research fit into your overall dissertation?
  - What effect will these findings have on the field?
  - How will this grant help you achieve your research goals?

References
  - References may be submitted in any style or format, as long as it is consistent throughout the proposal.

Other notes:
  - Use first-person singular pronouns (I, me, my, not we, us, our) to describe what you will do.
  - Define any jargon terms that people outside of your specific area of research may not know.
  - If possible, have someone else proofread your proposal to check for grammar and spelling errors.

Sample Proposals

Links to samples of successfully funded proposals are available on the award application form. Please note that these proposals are not meant to be prescriptive, and are not indicative of what proposals will be funded in the 2024 R. C. Lewontin award cycle. They are only meant to be examples of the structure and language used in previously successful proposals. These proposals are posted with permission of the authors. NOTE that these proposals only include the proposal and budget. Your proposal should also include the confirmation of eligibility as a signed letter from your thesis advisor or graduate director.

To access the application form and sample proposals, please follow the steps for submitting your application below.

Demographic Data Note

Beginning with the 2020 GREGs, SSE began requesting voluntary demographic information from award applicants in an effort to address bias and promote equity in awarding across multiple axes of diversity. Learn more about this process here.

 

Submitting Your Application:

  1. You must be an SSE member to access the application. To become a member or renew a lapsed membership, visit https://payments.evolutionsociety.org/joinsse/. (Tip: if you are joining SSE for the first time, you can ask your advisor to purchase a $10 gift membership for you.)
  2. To access the application, go to http://awards.evolutionsociety.org.
  3. In the top right corner of the page, log in with your SSE username and password.
  4. Click the green “here” link where it says “Click here to see your current award options.”
  5. Click “Submit new Proposal for 2024 R. C. Lewontin Early Award”.
  6. Complete the form. All questions are required. Note that the form includes demographic questions. You may choose not to answer any of these by selecting “Prefer not to say.” Learn more about why we are collecting demographic data and how it will be used here.
  7. Upload your proposal, budget, and note from your advisor as a single PDF (see instructions above).
  8. To submit your application, click “Complete”. 
  9. To save your application and come back to it at a later time, click “Save.”  If you click “Save”, be sure to come back to your application before the deadline and submit it by clicking “Complete”.
  10.  Whether you “Save” or “Complete” your application, you will receive an email at the address associated with your SSE membership (not necessarily the email address you provided on the Lewontin application form). This email will have a link to view and/or edit your application.

How to return to your application after clicking Save:

  1. Go to http://awards.evolutionsociety.org
  2. Click the green link where it says “Click here to see your current award options.”
  3. Click “My Applications”.
  4. Click the title of the application you wish to edit. Your application should appear.
  5. At the top of your application, click “Actions.” A dropdown menu will appear. Click “Edit”.
  6. Make any necessary changes.
  7. The PDF you uploaded previously will not appear, even though it is saved. You do not need to do anything to keep your previous PDF. To upload a new PDF, click “Choose File” and upload a new PDF.
  8. To submit your application, click “Complete.” 
  9. To save your application and come back to it at a later time, click “Save.”  If you click “Save”, be sure to come back to your application before the deadline and submit it by clicking “Complete”.
  10.  Whether you “Save” or “Complete” your application, you will receive an email at the address associated with your SSE membership (not necessarily the email address you provided on the Lewontin application form).

You can edit your application even if you have submitted it (i.e. clicked “Complete”). To edit your application, follow the steps above and click “Update” after making any changes.

To tell if your application has been submitted, go to the My Applications page, where all your applications will be listed with their status. If your application has been submitted, there will be a green box next to your application title that says “Complete”. If your application has not yet been submitted, there will be an orange box next to your application title that says “In Progress”. Be sure to check that your application has the green “Complete” status before the deadline.

You should receive an email confirmation of receipt of your materials within 72 hours. If you do not, please contact SSE-Manager@EvolutionSociety.org.

Please contact Kati Moore at communications@evolutionsociety.org with any questions about how to apply.

apply now button


DEADLINE: February 23, 2024, 12:00 PM Noon Pacific Time (GMT-8:00)

 
 

Evaluation Criteria

Applications will be reviewed on the following two broad criteria:

1. Proposal structure, logic, and clarity
(A) Motivation of research: How well does the proposal situate the project in the context of the field by stating the big-picture question and/or the broader significance?
 
(B) Clarity of hypotheses or questions: Are the specific hypotheses or research questions clearly stated? Does the proposal provide sufficient rationale so that the evaluator can understand the logic behind the hypotheses or questions?
 
(C) Connection between objectives and design: Does the proposal clearly and explicitly tie the hypothesis or research questions and the methods to the broad motivating question? Are the proposed methods appropriate to test the stated hypotheses/research questions?
 
(D) Explanation of methods / analysis: Does the proposal provide enough explanation of the proposed methods, in language that can be understood by an educated but non-expert reviewer?

2. Scientific contribution
Does the proposed project address an unresolved topic, in a novel or interesting way, that is likely to move the field of evolutionary biology forward?
 

Next Steps

All applicants will receive decisions on their proposals in May via email and will be able to access reviewer comments via the application portal. In addition, award winners will be announced on the SSE website and at the Evolution meeting during the SSE Presidential Address. SSE would be pleased if you consider submitting work funded by the R. C. Lewontin award to Evolution or Evolution Letters. All work published with funds from the award should acknowledge the work as funded by the Graduate Research Excellence Grant - R. C. Lewontin Early Award from SSE, and a full citation of the work should be submitted to SSE within 2 months of publication. Note that as a student SSE member publishing in Evolution, you would be eligible to apply for the SSE Presidents’ Award for Outstanding Paper in Evolution.

Awards are typically subject to 1099 reporting, and thus must be included as income by the recipient. All awardees will need to fill out an IRS. W-9 form whether or not they are a U.S. citizen, and whether or not they attend a U.S. university. To avoid paying tax on the award, awardees may have their check deposited in a university research account. This award covers direct costs of research only; institutional indirect costs may not be charged to this award. Non-U.S. citizens and those not filing U.S. tax returns are required to set up a separate university account to receive this award.

Members are encouraged to contribute to the Graduate Research Excellence Grants fund when renewing their membership!
 

Frequently Asked Questions

If I get the award, do I have to use the funds by a certain time?

No - there is no fixed timeline for using the funds and there are no formal reporting requirements beyond acknowledgement in a resulting publication.

My faculty advisor isn’t a member of SSE - am I eligible?

Yes, if you meet the other requirements - faculty advisors are no longer required to be members of SSE.

I received an R. C. Lewontin Early Award already. Can I apply for this award again?

No. Previous recipients of the R. C. Lewontin Early Award are ineligible to receive the award again. 

I applied for an R. C. Lewontin Early Award last year but didn’t receive it. Can I apply for this award again?

Yes. Previous applicants who were not selected for funding are welcome to re-apply, providing they still meet the eligibility requirements.

I applied for a Rosemary Grant Advanced Award last year but didn’t receive it. Can I apply for the R. C. Lewontin Early Award this year?

No. Previous applicants to the Rosemary Grant Advanced Award are ineligible to apply for the R. C. Lewontin Early Award. We encourage you to apply for the Rosemary Grant Advanced Award in the fall.

If I receive an R. C. Lewontin Early Award, does that make me ineligible to receive a Rosemary Grant Advanced Award?

No. Receiving an R. C. Lewontin Early Award does not preclude you from receiving a Rosemary Grant Advanced Award, as long as you meet the other requirements and at least one year has passed since you received the Lewontin Early Award. 

Can I use the award to pay part of my own salary? 

No, salaries are not considered a research expense for this award. Awarded funds, can, however, be used to pay hourly wages for student research assistants. 

Can I use the award to attend a meeting or workshop?

No. Meeting or workshop attendance and/or travel are not considered research expenses for this award. Funds may be used for other research-related travel, however, including travel and lodging for field collecting or sample analysis.

Can I use the award to purchase a computer?

No. Computers are not considered a research expense for this award.  


View full page

UPDATE OCTOBER 2, 4:30 PM EASTERN: The awards website is currently experiencing some technical difficulties that we are working to resolve. We have extended the deadline to October 3 at 12:00 PM Eastern; please check back in several hours if possible and try again to submit your application then. Please contact communications@evolutionsociety.org with any questions or concerns. Thank you for your patience!
 
 

Text: Society for the Study of Evolution Graduate Reserach Excellence Grants, Rosemary Grant Advanced Awards, Deadline: October 2, 5:00 PM Eastern.
 
 

2023 Rosemary Grant Advanced Awards Competition

The Rosemary Grant Advanced Awards, part of the Graduate Research Excellence Grants, are to assist students in the later stages of their PhD programs. Funds can be used to enhance the scope of dissertation research, such as to conduct additional experiments or field work. Awards up to US $3500 will be granted. 

Students are eligible if they are SSE members, will defend after September 15, 2024, and are either 1) in at least their 3rd year of a >4-year doctoral degree program, 2) in the 2nd year of a 3- to 4-year program, or 3) otherwise deemed “advanced” by a letter from their advisor or graduate director. Students should also confirm that the proposed work is outside the scope of other funding currently held by either the student or their advisor. 

Application instructions and evaluation criteria will be posted here when available.

Deadline: October 2, 2023, 5:00 PM Eastern The deadline has been extended to October 3, 12:00 PM Eastern.


About | Eligibility | Funding | How to apply | Evaluation criteria | Next steps | FAQ

 
About

The Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) is pleased to announce the 2023 Graduate Research Excellence Grant (GREG) – Rosemary Grant Advanced Award competition. These awards are to assist students in the later stages of their PhD programs. These grants are part of the Graduate Research Excellence Grants award program.

 
Eligibility

Only advanced* PhD students who are more than 12 months from defense date at the proposal due date are eligible. Eligibility can be confirmed by the advisor or graduate director stating that the student fulfills these requirements. 

*Advanced PhD students are defined as:

  • 3rd year or beyond in a >4-year doctoral degree program (="post candidacy")
  • 2nd year of a 3- to 4-year doctoral degree program
  • Other (explanation required in the letter from your thesis advisor or graduate director for what makes you eligible for the "advanced" award)

Student applicants must be members of SSE, and are advised to join SSE, if not already members, as soon as possible to facilitate their applications.

Previous applicants to the GREG - Rosemary Grant Advanced Award who were not selected for funding are welcome to re-apply if they still meet the other eligibility requirements.

This award is
not limited to students in the United States, and we welcome applications from our international members. 

Applicants do not have to be enrolled in an evolutionary biology program to apply, but proposals must address a topic in evolutionary biology.

The applicant's advisor is not required to be a member of SSE in order for the student to apply for this award.

 
Funding

Awards will range from US$2,000 - $3,500 and approximately ten awards will be made. Funds can be used to enhance the scope of dissertation research, such as to conduct additional experiments or field work. Funding is not limited to any particular aspect of research. Students should confirm that the proposed work is outside the scope of other funding held by either the student or their advisor. NOTE: Indirect costs may not be charged to any of our awards or grants.

 
How to apply

***The 2023 GREG - Rosemary Grant Advanced Award applications will be due October 2, 2023.***

You must be a member of SSE to access the application. Join or renew your membership here.

Log in to access the award application here. Use your SSE member username and password. If you have forgotten your username or password, you will be able to reset it. 

After you log in, click “Submit a new Proposal for ‘2023 Rosemary Grant Advanced Award’” to access the application.

The application will request the following information:

  1. Proposal Title
  2. Your First Name
  3. Your Last Name
  4. Confirmation that:
    1. You are an “Advanced” PhD student (see Eligibility requirements).
    2. Your defense date will be after September 22, 2024.
    3. The proposal describes your own ideas in your own words and you have a leading role in the project.
    4. The proposed work is outside the scope of other funding held either by you or your advisor.
  5. Your email address
  6. The name of your university
  7. The name of the department, center, or institute you are affiliated with at your university
  8. Supervisor First Name
  9. Supervisor Last Name
  10. Supervisor Email Address
  11. Total Amount Requested (see Funding guidelines above)
  12. A single PDF containing your proposal, budget, and confirmation of eligibility as a signed letter from your thesis advisor or graduate director.

This PDF must have one-inch margins (= 2.5 cm) and size 12 font and include your:

  1. Research proposal, describing objectives, methods, significance, and schedule, including how the award would enhance your thesis work (max. two single-spaced pages including literature cited and any figures and tables);
  2. Budget (1 page; no justification necessary, just a clear budget);
  3. Confirmation of eligibility as a signed letter from the thesis advisor or graduate director. This should include confirmation that:
    a. the applicant meets the “advanced” requirement defined above,† and
    b. the applicant’s defense date is more than 12 months from the proposal due date. 

    †If the applicant selects "Other" as the reason they meet the "Advanced" criteria, the letter must include an explanation of what makes this student "Advanced". 

    Note: This letter is *not* a letter of recommendation; only include the information requested.

    Sample letter:
    Dear Selection Committee,
    This letter confirms that [Student Name] is eligible for the SSE GREG - Rosemary Grant Advanced Award. I am [Student Name]’s supervisor. [Student Name] is in the third year of our five year PhD program and is post-candidacy. [Student Name] is more than 12 months from defending their thesis. 
    Sincerely,
    [Advisor/Graduate Director Name]

Research Proposal

In your research proposal, focus on convincing the selection committee of the importance of the question, how the funds will allow you to reach certain objectives and expand the scope of your thesis work, and how these objectives fit into your overall thesis project. 

Links to previously funded proposals are available on the application form. Please note that these proposals are not meant to be prescriptive, and are not indicative of what proposals will be funded in this year's award cycle. They are only meant to be examples of the structure and language used in previously successful proposals. These proposals are posted with permission of the authors. 

Note that these proposals only include the proposal and budget. Your proposal should also include the confirmation of eligibility as a signed letter from your thesis advisor or graduate director. See the instructions above for a sample letter.

General proposal structure with length suggestions:

Background (250-500 words)
  - Start with the big picture: What is the context of your proposed research? What is already known about this area of study?
  - Summarize previous research in this field: What findings will your work build upon? What are the gaps in our knowledge that your research will try to answer?

Research Objective (100-150 words)
  - State your specific hypothesis: What is your research question? What will you learn from this study? How will it address a gap in our knowledge of this field?

Methods (250-500 words)
  - Data collection: What data will you collect, and how?
  - Data analysis: How will you analyze your data?
  - Connection to research objective: How will collecting these data allow you to answer your research question?

Significance/Impact (150-300 words)
  - How does this research fit into your overall dissertation?
  - What effect will these findings have on the field?
  - How will this grant help you achieve your research goals?

References
- References may be submitted in any style or format, as long as it is consistent throughout the proposal.

Other notes:
  - Use first-person singular pronouns (I, me, my, not we, us, our) to describe what you will do.
  - Define any jargon terms that people outside of your specific area of research may not know.
  - If possible, have someone else proofread your proposal to check for grammar and spelling errors.

Demographic Information

The application also requests demographic information. Your answers to these questions will not be visible to the review committee during evaluation. Answering demographic questions is voluntary — each question includes an option not to answer, and you may choose to answer as many or as few questions as you wish. Anonymized, aggregate responses will be used to assess demographic patterns in applicants and awardees and to assess any potential bias in awarding, as part of our efforts to pursue equity in awards and grants. Learn more about what data will be collected and how they will be used.

Submitting Your Application

At the bottom of the application, you have the option to SAVE or COMPLETE your application. Click SAVE to save your work and come back to it later. Click COMPLETE to submit your application. Your application must be marked as COMPLETE in order to be scored.

After you submit your materials by clicking COMPLETE, you should receive an email confirmation of receipt within 72 hours. If you do not, please contact SSE-Manager@EvolutionSociety.org.

Please email communications@evolutionsociety.org with any questions.

DEADLINE: October 2, 2023, 5:00 PM Eastern Time (GMT-4:00) The deadline has been extended to October 3, 12:00 PM Eastern.

green Apply Now button

 
Evaluation Criteria

Applications will be reviewed using the following two broad criteria:

1. Proposal structure, logic, and clarity
(A) Motivation of research: How well does the proposal situate the project in the context of the field by stating the big-picture question and/or the broader significance?
(B) Clarity of hypotheses or questions: Are the specific hypotheses or research questions clearly stated? Does the proposal provide sufficient rationale so that the evaluator can understand the logic behind the hypotheses or questions?
(C) Connection between objectives and design: Does the proposal clearly and explicitly tie the hypothesis or research questions and the methods to the broad motivating question? Are the proposed methods appropriate to test the stated hypotheses/research questions?
(D) Explanation of methods / analysis: Does the proposal provide enough explanation of the proposed methods, in language that can be understood by an educated but non-expert reviewer?

2. Scientific contribution
Does the proposed project address an unresolved topic, in a novel or interesting way, that is likely to move the field of evolutionary biology forward?

 
Next steps

All applicants will receive decisions on their proposals in December via email and will be able to access reviewer comments on the awards site. In addition, award winners will be announced on the SSE website and at the following year's Evolution meeting during the SSE Presidential Address. 

Awards directly to the awardee are typically subject to 1099 reporting, and thus must be included as income by the recipient. All awardees receiving the award directly will need to complete an IRS W-9 or W8-BEN form prior to dispersal of the award. The appropriate form will depend on the awardee's individual tax filing obligations. Alternatively, awardees may have their check deposited in a university research account. This award covers direct costs of research only; institutional indirect costs may not be charged to this award.

Recipients will be invited to present their research in a new virtual graduate research seminar hosted by SSE and the SSE Graduate Student Advisory Committee.

SSE would be pleased if you consider submitting work funded by the Rosemary Grant award to Evolution or Evolution Letters. All work published with funds from the award should acknowledge the work as funded by the Graduate Research Excellence Grant - Rosemary Grant Advanced Award from SSE. Please send a link to your paper to communications@evolutionsociety.org after publication for our internal records and so that we may promote your work on social media.

Members are encouraged to contribute to the Graduate Research Excellence Grant award program!


Frequently Asked Questions

If I get the award, do I have to use the funds by a certain time?

No, there is no deadline for using the funds.

My faculty advisor isn’t a member of SSE - am I eligible?

Yes, if you meet the other requirements - faculty advisors are no longer required to be members of SSE. 

I received a Lewontin Early Award already. Does this make me ineligible to receive a Rosemary Grant Advanced Award?

No. Receiving a Lewontin Early Award does not preclude you from receiving a Rosemary Grant Advanced Award, as long as you meet the other requirements and at least one year has passed since you received the Lewontin Early Award. If you received a Lewontin Early Award earlier this year, you may not apply for this round of Rosemary Grant Advanced Awards.

Can I use the award to pay part of my own salary? 

No, salaries are not considered a research expense for this award. Awarded funds, can, however, be used to pay hourly wages for student research assistants. 

Can I use the award to attend a meeting or workshop?

No. Meeting or workshop attendance and/or travel are not considered research expenses for this award. Travel and lodging for field collecting or sample analysis is permitted.

Can I use the award to purchase a computer?

No. Computers are not considered a research expense for this award.

If you do not see your question here, please contact communications@evolutionsociety.org. 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Seema Sheth
Assistant Professor
Plant and Microbial Biology
North Carolina State University
www.seemasheth.weebly.com
Start date: January 2018

PhD: Colorado State University; Advisor: Amy Angert.
Postdoc: University of Minnesota; Advisor: Ruth Shaw. Postdoc: UC Berkeley, Advisors: David Ackerly and Bruce Baldwin.

About the department:

Research in the Department of Plant and Microbial Biology spans a wide range of disciplines, including biotechnology, cell biology, ecology, and evolutionary biology. Our department is incredibly collegial and supportive of early career faculty. Beyond our department, there is a vibrant and growing community of evolutionary biologists spread across campus, and we are situated in the Research Triangle near even more evolutionary biologists at other institutions including the University of North Carolina and Duke University.

About the research:

We study the processes that promote or hinder evolutionary adaptation at various biological scales, including populations, species, and clades. We examine how quantitative genetic variation and demographic processes influence the dynamics of adaptation to novel conditions such as those beyond range edges or those that have arisen due to climatic changes. Further, we investigate why some species can evolve broad climatic niches and large geographic ranges, while other species are narrowly restricted to a limited range of environments and places. We combine quantitative genetics, statistical models, and field and greenhouse experiments to tackle key questions in biogeography, ecology, and evolution.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

Yes! We are recruiting PhD students and undergraduates. We are excited to have curious, self-driven individuals who are interested in being part of an inclusive and respectful team of evolutionary ecologists. We strive to give PhD students opportunities to develop independent research projects, and deeply value strong communication among lab members.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution meeting was in Portland in 2010. I presented a poster on the determinants of geographic range size in western North American monkeyflowers. Poster sessions at Evolution meetings are the best. There was a constant stream of visitors excited to talk with me about my research, which helped me to build confidence about the direction my dissertation was starting to take. It was also the first time I met several members of the Mimulus community, many of whom have become close colleagues and collaborators. SSE is a supportive and progressive community that I've enjoyed being a part of over the past several years.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

Absolutely! I published my second dissertation chapter, where we assessed whether geographically widespread species have evolved broader thermal tolerances than species that are restricted in distribution. The reviewers and Associate Editor were thorough and enthusiastic, and it was one of the most pleasant processes of review and publication that I've ever experienced.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I am Science Director for GLORIA Great Basin, a non-profit organization whose mission is to study the effects of climate change on alpine plants as part of a broader international effort. Though my main role is to contribute to scientific research, through volunteering and serving on the board, I interact with dozens of volunteers from various backgrounds, including federal land agency partners, botanists, graduate students, and other alpine enthusiasts. It has been an inspiring group to work with, and we are unified by our passion for alpine environments and plants. I look forward to promoting science through these activities for years to come!

Do you have a time management tip to share?

While I was in grad school, I became part of an accountability/writing group with two other PhD students who were at similar stages. Seven years later, we're still going strong and exchange weekly e-mail updates and monthly video conferences across three different time zones. This group has helped me tremendously with time management, among many other things.

What is your favorite app?

iNaturalist, Gaia GPS

Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

The Darwinian Demon, In Defense of Plants

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

Anything that involves being outside, whether walking around town, hiking on a trail, or jogging. I am an aspiring naturalist and love to learn as much as I can about all of the plants, birds, insects, herps, etc. that I encounter while out and about. I also enjoy an eclectic array of music, from opera, country, and hip hop to many genres in between.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Yoav Ram
Senior Lecturer
School of Computer Science
IDC Herzliya
http://www.yoavram.com
Start date: October 2018

PhD: Tel Aviv University; Advisor: Lilach Hadany.
Postdoc: Stanford University; Advisor: Marc Feldman.

About the department:

IDC Herzliya, established in 1994, is a private research college, which is unique in Israel. A quarter of our 7,000 students are international, which is also unique in Israel. I'm part of a small group of computational biologists in the School of Computer Science.

About the research:

I study evolutionary biology and cultural evolution using mathematical, computational, and statistical models and collaborations with experimental biologists and sociologists. My main focus is studying the evolution of processes that generate and transmit variation, both genetic and phenotypic. This includes the evolution of genetic processes like mutation, recombination, and aneuploidy, as well as cultural processes like learning and imitation. I'm also interested in analysis of evolutionary experiments using model-based approaches. In my first year here, I found that computer science students at different levels are very intrigued by basic questions in evolution and keen to learn how they can apply their computational know-how to study evolution.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Prioritizing my increasing number of responsibilities. There are just so many conflicting short, intermediate, and long-term tasks. Fortunately, a fellow postdoc (Andrew Letten) introduced me to the book “Deep Work” by Cal Newport, and by proxy, “The Shallows” by Nicholas Carr. These books have deeply changed how I handle my time and attention. For example, I quit WhatsApp over a year ago and have recently switched from iPhone to Nokia (i.e. “stupidphone”).

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

Of course! My first publication was in Evolution (Ram & Hadany (2012) The Evolution of stress-induced hypermutation in asexual populations. Evolution 66 (7): 2315–28). It was previously rejected from two other journals, and it was also initially rejected at Evolution. However, the associate editor offered tips on an analysis that we could do. These turned out to be very helpful, and we were able to complete the mathematical analysis and resubmit the paper, which was accepted (after another minor revision). The whole experience was very influential, because I got to experience how the journal peer-review system can significantly improve my work.

Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

This year I taught evolutionary modelling to computer science students, both in an undergrad advanced course and in a graduate seminar. They were surprised to see how simple evolutionary models (e.g. Hardy-Weinberg, Wright-Fisher) can produce complex and counter-intuitive dynamics. One example is the extinction of cooperation due to invasion by cheaters, and how it can be prevented in subdivided populations, where group selection can act efficiently. Another example is the complex mutation rate dynamics that can occur in adapting microbial populations. Lastly, they were very intrigued by gene-culture co-evolution models and other topics in cultural evolution.

Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

The last couple of years I gave a Darwin Day talk in my son’s school. I try to convey the time scales involved in evolution, the processes (selection, mutations, drift, gene flow), how no one species is “better” than the rest (tree vs. ladder). Then I give some examples and evidence of evolution: industrial melanism, drug resistance (e.g. Kishony’s “Mega-plate”), lactase persistence, dog domestication, etc. The kids are really interested and have surprisingly good questions.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

If you find it hard to carve out blocks of time for concentrated work, read “Deep Work” by Cal Newport. It’s full of strategies and tips, as well as some important counter-intuitive thought provoking ideas.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Invest time in professional development. Seek out soft skills workshops (e.g. management, negotiations, speaking) and grant writing academies at your institute. I found these well worth the time investment (and you can always just leave in the middle of the workshop if it doesn’t pan out). In some cases, you get to learn from top professionals on a subject they have studied for decades.

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

At the beginning of my first talk at an international conference, my legs were shaking bad, totally out of control. Fortunately, my PhD mentor, Lilach Hadany, insisted I practice my 15 min talk again and again. So, I just stood there shaking and reciting for the first 5 minutes; after that, I somehow relaxed and even managed to enjoy the rest of the talk. I was surprised to receive good feedback from the audience – I thought the shaking was really bad. After attending more conferences, I understood that most people sympathize with you if you seem nervous, rather than criticize you, as long as you are well-prepared and honest.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

Hiking; reading books, lately mostly sci-fi (The Expanse is fantastic); sitting in the yard with my family (four kids, two dogs, one cat). I’ve recently started making cocktails at home, and it’s much more fun than I thought it would be.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plating fluorescent bacteria with my son.

View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Kevin Arbuckle
Lecturer
Department of Biosciences
Swansea University
https://swansea.academia.edu/KevinArbuckle
Start date: October 2016
PhD: University of Liverpool; Advisor: Mike Speed.

 

About the department:

Swansea University's Department of Biosciences is an incredibly friendly and supportive research environment situated right beside beaches and coastline designated as Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The Department has heavily expanded in the last few years and contains a high proportion of early career faculty which creates an energetic and intellectually stimulating institution.

About the research:

My lab aims to understand the origin and evolution of biodiversity, focusing on venomous and poisonous animals, and takes a phylogenetic comparative approach to a diverse range of evolutionary questions. Broad areas of research include the evolution of venomous animals and their venoms, the association between organismal traits and evolutionary diversification, the behavioural ecology of antipredator defence, and convergent evolution. However, my research has ranged from exotic animal husbandry to human behavioural ecology as I maintain a multidisciplinary approach. My work involves a wide range of vertebrate and invertebrate study systems, but has a particular focus on amphibians and reptiles.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Coming straight from my PhD, and despite gaining as much teaching experience as possible beforehand, the drop in research time available due to other teaching and administrative duties has taken a while to become comfortable with.

How have you prepared to be a PI?

My career has largely been guided by 'do what interests me', so focusing on my own research interests and building collaborations around these, as well as developing experience of teaching has incidentally prepared me for the role.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

I spend a lot of time emphasizing to undergraduate students the basic fundamentals of how science works and what doing science is like, using examples from my own experience. I tend to consider postgraduate students (especially PhD students) more as less experienced collaborators than as students, which contributes to a friendly and open environment. I believe this more personal approach helps to develop students as well-rounded scientists and people.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

No funded positions are available at the moment, but I'm always happy to support fellowship applications to join my lab. I consider research achievement and potential of course, but I also think it is key to try and ensure that we get on, as this helps maintain an open and friendly lab environment.

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I joined SSE in 2010 at the tail-end of my undergraduate degree, mostly to keep up to date with key literature in evolutionary biology, but also to take advantage of the many other benefits of the society.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

I am strongly in favor of supporting scientific societies so membership in itself is something I encourage as it maintains a sense of community in the field.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution meeting was the joint meeting in Ottawa. This had a huge impact on my career as it was the first large conference I had attended and my PhD supervisor, who went with me to the meeting, was excellent in introducing me to many key people in my field. This has led to additional networking opportunities and in some cases publication resulting from chats at other Evolution meetings.

If you could meet one other SSE member for the first time, who would it be and why?

I have tried to meet as many people as I can at Evolution meetings in particular, but Stacey Smith is one person who I admire for her clarity of explanations and enthusiasm for the subject. This comes through especially in her fantastic introductory textbook with David Baum (Tree Thinking) which I use as recommended reading for my own macroevolution module.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I have always been keen on outreach and public engagement, starting in a more organised way at 13 years old giving herp and invert demonstrations at a zoo. I now take as many opportunities as I have time for to do the same, including media interviews (radio, tv, and newspapers), taking part in national outreach events (such as 'I'm a Scientist'), producing popular articles for magazines, and giving popular science talks to public audiences.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

Yes, I teach a second year module on tetrapod evolution and a final year module on macroevolution and phylogenies. The latter module has a partial partial focus on methods, so our students (biology, zoology, and marine biology) often struggle with more analytical concepts such as likelihood and others related to models.

Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

Students are often very surprised to learn that traits which are advantageous at the level of individuals might be detrimental at higher scales, so 'species selection' is a novelty for many of them.

How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

I think we tend to put too much emphasis on the idea that all science needs to be immediately useful to humanity. Even most applications of evolutionary biology have their roots in basic research with no obviously applied slant (at least at the time it was carried out). This is often ignored or considered unimportant by funders and the public alike, and it's something we should emphasise more. That said, with a focus on simply understanding evolution we have tools and applications that arise from this alone, for instance some of my work on convergent evolution which can be used to predict susceptibility of native species to toxic invaders such as toads.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

Don't take on too much, learn to say no. I struggle with this myself but I've learned the hard way once or twice.

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

There are many excellent books and the best depends on a person's interests (as with everything), but from a comparative biologist perspective I think Pagel and Harvey's classic 'The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology' is still a clear and readable introduction which can be built on.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Everything takes longer than you think it will and everyone gets more rejections than they can count, don't take it personally.

How was your first faculty meeting?

Surprisingly OK, our Department has a brilliant track record of meetings finishing on time or (usually) early, so this was a nice but unexpected finding.

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

Absolutely, but my strategy is to make light of it and do what I can to deal with it at the time without adding any more disruption or delay than necessary.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

Yes, failing to clearly link each datapoint in collated datasets to the literature source it came from. I now make much more of an effort to do this and warn my students about this problem as it's really embarrassing when you struggle to find the source again 5 years later!

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I play a bit of guitar, bass, and drums, and occasionally write music in a range of styles I listen to (from punk to 'classical'). I wouldn't say I do this at all well but it keeps me amused.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

Free time? Between my job and my 2-year-old I've almost forgotten what that is. Seriously though, my free time is mostly taken up with three things: reading, herping (or general natural history walks), and music.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Nancy Chen
Assistant Professor
Department of Biology
University of Rochester
https://popgenchenlab.github.io/
Start date: July 2018

PhD: Cornell University; Advisor: Dr. Andrew Clark & Dr. John Fitzpatrick.
Postdoc Cornell University (2014-2015); Advisor: Dr. Andrew Clark & Dr. John Fitzpatrick. University of California, Davis (2015-2018); Dr. Graham Coop.
 
 
 

About the department:

I am an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biology at the University of Rochester, specifically in the Ecology, Evolution, Genetics, and Genomics group. Although our department is relatively small, we have an unusually high concentration of ecological and evolutionary genetics labs. We have a newish computational biology major, which means there are lots of awesome computational undergrads here!

About the research:

Research in my lab focuses on the evolution of natural populations on short timescales. How do population demography, selection, and gene flow interact to shape evolution and genomic variation? What are the genomic consequences of population decline? To answer these questions, we integrate population genomics and quantitative genetics with extensive pedigree and phenotypic data from long-term demographic studies of vertebrates. By tracing the inheritance of genetic material down the pedigree, we can directly characterize the evolutionary processes shaping patterns of genomic variation through space and time, providing a deeper insight into the process of contemporary evolution at the genomic level.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Definitely time management. I feel like I'm juggling multiple balls and dropping nearly all of them, which I'm told is normal for a new PI but still makes me uncomfortable. I've started a few new collaborations that I'm super excited about, and I’m figuring out how to switch my brain among multiple different projects quickly. I've also learned that I'm not super efficient at getting big tasks done in short time periods between meetings, so now I'm trying to be better about blocking out big chunks of time to clear my mind and really work through a problem or write.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

How quickly I've become unnecessary to my students (kidding! I hope...). At our first ever lab meeting, as we were outlining the schedule for the semester, I mentioned that I would be out of town next week and asked if they wanted to skip lab meeting. Without any hesitation, my students decided to go ahead and run an R workshop without me. I was a bit taken aback at first, then flooded with happiness and pride at their independence.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

I believe that every student needs different things from their advisor, and these needs can change over time. I'm trying my best to adapt my mentoring style for each student, which means that I rely on open and honest communication. When someone joins my lab, we talk about our expectations for each other and the best ways to communicate. I'm currently working on setting up an outline for individual development plans, and I plan on revisiting goals and expectations with each lab member regularly.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

Yes! I'm looking for creative, motivated team players with some computational skills and a passion for learning and exploring.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution Meeting was the 2006 meeting in Stonybrook. I was a rising senior, and my undergrad advisor Scott Edwards had encouraged me to go to the conference to meet people and help me decide where to go to grad school. I remember being overwhelmed by the sheer number of evolutionary biologists when I first walked into the opening ceremony. I had a great conversation with a grad student that made me decide to apply to Cornell for grad school. Another memorable moment from that conference: my first (and rather traumatic) introduction to ticks during a pre-meeting field trip to the Long Island pine barrens.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I am dedicated to promoting social equality and building more inclusive communities. Most of my work in this area involves running women in science groups as well as diversity and inclusion trainings. I also really enjoy teaching interactive lessons for K-12 students, and I'm looking forward to participating in our Upward Bound program this summer.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Form relationships with multiple mentors and make sure you have a strong support network. We all need mentorship on many different things (science, communication skills, professional development, etc.), and you may not necessarily be able to find a single person who can provide all the various types of support you need. Besides, it is often helpful to get advice from multiple people with different perspectives and experiences. Having a good network of friends/family is also really important because grad school can be hard, and a strong support system will help you deal with the inevitable rejections/failures we all experience (related note: be sure to celebrate all accomplishments, however small!). A piece of advice I got from a mentor in grad school that really struck me at the time is to not put your life on hold. Your life is happening now, so live it to the fullest. Try to establish good work-life balance early. Grad school is a long time commitment, and your workload is only going to increase. Working long hours does not always translate to working efficiently and high productivity. Also, having non-work activities that give you joy will help keep you happy when everything seems to be failing in lab.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Imposter syndrome never goes away, not even after you get a Ph.D. (or a faculty job, for that matter). Sorry. Also, I found it helpful to put together a job application early. Thinking through what qualifications you need to get your dream job (e.g., what is the cover letter you wish you could write?) helps pinpoint areas to focus on and skills to acquire during your postdoc.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I have a left cervical rib, which I only discovered after getting an injury from canoeing (and/or portaging - probably both) too much. My mammalogist friends got really excited because mammals aren't supposed to have cervical ribs.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

Most of my hobbies are outdoor activities such as hiking, backpacking, running, birding, etc. I garden indoors. I'm also an avid cook and baker, though I'm only allowed to make desserts for other people.

 
 

 A banded Florida Scrub-Jay from the long-term demographic study at Archbold Biological Station.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 The multigenerational scrub-jay pedigree.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 Nancy, Angela Tringali, and Young Ha Suh process 11-day-old nestlings.

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Natalie C. Steinel
Assistant Professor
Biological Sciences
University of Massachusetts Lowell
steinellab.com
Start date: September 2018

PhD: University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine; Advisor: Craig Bassing.
Postdoc: University of Texas at Austin; Advisor: Daniel Bolnick.
Other position(s): Instructor of Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin.
 
 

About the department:

I’m an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. The Biology degree programs focus not only on academic career paths but also on preparing students for industry positions.

About the research:

My lab uses the model organism threespine stickleback to study the evolutionary origins of the vertebrate adaptive immune system and the co-evolution of hosts and pathogens. While much is known about mammalian adaptive immunity, substantially less is known about the adaptive immune responses of other vertebrates, including fish, the taxa in which adaptive immunity first evolved. We use a comparative approach to characterize the activation and kinetics of the adaptive immune response in stickleback. We also use the natural parasite of threespine stickleback, Schistocephalus solidus, to study host-parasite co-evolution. In particular we study the mechanisms by which this tapeworm can immunosuppress its host.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

The biggest challenge so far as a new PI has been recruiting graduate and postdoctoral trainees. Because I’m new and do not yet have name recognition in the field, and UML has a brand new Biology PhD program, I have had to be quite proactive in advertising positions in my lab.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

I’ve been surprised about how long it can take to get a new lab up and running. Everything from purchasing equipment, hiring staff, recruiting grad students, and renovating lab space takes much longer that expected. I’ve had to learn how to be patient and find other ways to remain productive.

How have you prepared to be a PI?

I took any and every opportunity during my training to gain teaching and mentoring experience. Even though teaching wasn’t a requirement in my graduate program, I sought out teaching opportunities throughout grad school. I TA’d two courses, designed and taught mini-courses for a science magnet school, and volunteered to teach lectures in non-major science courses. During my postdoctoral training I had a split appointment: 75% time doing research and 25% time as an Instructor of Medicine at the Dell Medical School. The position at DMS involved designing a new course from scratch, an experience which has been invaluable both in helping me stand out on the job market and in my new position at UML. With respect to mentoring, during my PhD I worked with elementary school science fair participants to design their projects. During my postdoc, I mentored graduate and undergraduate researchers in the lab and took mentoring workshops. At the medical school, I also took every opportunity to serve on committees and participate in the administrative side of things. This service experience has really given me a head start on learning the ropes as a faculty member at UML.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

With all mentees in the lab, I use a mentoring compact to learn about the trainee’s goals and set expectations both for the trainee and myself. I find that by putting these goals and expectations into writing helps us both be sure that we’re working towards the same ends. This is a document that we return to throughout the trainee’s time in the lab and adjust as necessary. I also follow the model of the great advisors I’ve had in the past: I care about about my trainees/students, I have an open door policy, and I respond promptly to questions/requests for help.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

Yes, I’m currently accepting masters and PhD students.

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I joined SSE during my postdoctoral training.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

I’m an immunologist by training, and my early career work has focused on the mechanisms of immunity. My SSE membership has added a new facet to my research by broadening my studies beyond the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie immunobiology, to understand the evolutionary significance of these mechanisms.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first evolution meeting was in Austin in 2016. This meeting was amazing for networking and a great opportunity to hear about research outside of my training area.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Learn how to graciously take criticism. The more feedback you get on your research plan, manuscripts, and talks, the better your work will be. Understand that those giving feedback are doing so to help you. Keep an open mind, don’t get defensive, and take notes of what they suggest!

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Look for postdoc positions that will give the freedom and independence to develop your own research projects.

How was your first faculty meeting?

Welcomed by my new colleagues but a bit overwhelmed when I realized I had a lot to learn about the ins and outs of how my new institution works.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

On my first experiment as a newly-hired technician I dropped the entire 96 well plate on the last step, ruining the entire experiment. Of course I was on the verge of tears and sure I was going to be fired. Luckily I had an amazing mentor, who said "these things happen, it's not the end of the world. We'll do it again tomorrow". It put me in the right mindset for lab work: everything that can go wrong, will go wrong. It's part of science and you can't let it get you down.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I also have a BA in French and worked in France for a year after undergrad.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I love movies and try to go to as many as possible. I really enjoy cooking and I’m constantly looking for new recipes to try!


 
 
 
 
 
 

 A threespine stickleback that was heavily infected with 20+ Schistocephalus solidus tapeworms.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Mobile lab set up on Spirit lake in Alaska. We are studying the evolution of the immune response in recently transplanted wild stickleback populations.


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Jonathan Puritz
Assistant Professor
Biological Sciences
University of Rhode Island
MarineEvoEco.com
Start date: August 2017

PhD: University of Hawaii at Manoa; Advisor: Robert J. Toonen.
Postdocs: Northeastern University; Advisor: Katie E. Lotterhos. Texas A&M University and Texas A&M Corpus Christi; Advisor: John Gold.
 
 

About the department:

Given that Rhode Island is the Ocean State, it’s no surprise that one of the strengths of the Biological Sciences Department at URI is Marine Evolution. However, the department has strengths across many other biological disciplines, and is an excellent collaborative environment. My lab is based on the main campus in Kingston, but we also have access to the Bay Campus (10 mins away) that’s right on Narragansett Bay with a full sea water facility. One unique aspect of my position is that I share a large physical lab space with two other new PIs, Dr. Hollie Putnam and Dr. Carlos Prada. It’s great to build a large shared molecular and wet lab space together as well as collegial and synergistic lab environment for our students.

About the research:

Coastal ecosystems face a complex of stressors that span temporal and spatial scales, from long-term global ocean change to localized episodes of coastal acidification. Understanding how marine populations will evolve in response to environmental change requires investigating the synergistic impacts of multiple stressors across all life stages. Our research investigates how natural and anthropogenic processes affect the evolution of marine populations through the lens of larval dispersal. We combine laboratory multi-stressor larval exposure experiments with genomic surveys of natural populations, analyzing patterns of selection and migration using seascape genomic models. Our lab also develops laboratory and bioinformatic methods to facilitate the use of next-generation sequencing in non-model species.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

I'm guessing that my answer is similar to all other new PIs: management. I mean this both in terms of managing my own time and responsibilities but also managing my students and employees. I'm always striving to find better ways to stay organized with my time with the primary goal of being able to give more of it to my students, and I will be the first to admit that this has been, for the most part, a trial by fire. This need for management is coupled with a striving and desire to push yourself and your research program further. For example, Evolution in Providence this summer was my first meeting where I brought my lab. It was so close to us that I took both of my PhD students and my lab manager, each of whom presented posters. I also decided that I was going to present a talk, a poster, and the iEvolBio software bazaar. We all pushed ourselves hard, and we had an incredibly successful meeting. However, this max effort left me wiped out for a couple of days. With better planning and management, I'm hoping to limit these over-the-limit kind of days with a more consistent workflow spread out more efficiently over time.

How have you prepared to be a PI?

I did a few different postdocs at different institutions which helped, and all of my postdoctoral advisors were great with advice. Rob Toonen, my PhD advisor, and Katie Lotterhos, my final postdoctoral advisor, continue to be sounding boards and sources of advice. Beyond advice and mentorship, some of my best training came from Chris Bird. Chris did his postdoc in the same lab I did my PhD, and when I arrived at Texas A&M Corpus Christi as a postdoc in a different lab, he was in year two of his current faculty position. Being outside of his lab and a friend, I got an intimate look into Chris's new faculty experience, both the positive experiences and many of the challenges. This is definitely a bit of a special situation, but was an incredible training experience. I'd recommend any postdoc try to become friends with a new faculty at their institution, so that they can get this kind of perspective.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution Meeting was Portland, Oregon in 2010, and it will forever have a special place in my heart. This was the first meeting that I attended with my PhD advisor, Rob Toonen. Being a graduate student at the University of Hawaii, it was not always easy or cost effective for both of us to be at the same meeting. After attending several conferences by myself or only with a few other graduate students, having Rob there to introduce me to his colleagues and extend my professional network made the entire conference an incredibly positive experience. This was also the first conference where I presented some of the most novel results from my PhD, and the positive comments, questions, and interactions I had after my talk helped give me the confidence to later submit my first, first-authored manuscript later that year.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I'm still working on setting up local outreach efforts, but I am a regular participant in both Skype-a-Scientist (www.skypeascientist.com) and the Letters to a Pre-Scientist (www.prescientist.org) program. I highly recommend both to SSE members as each allows you diversify your outreach audience and share your research with a truly engaging audience.

Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

My favorite blog is definitely the Molecular Ecologist (www.molecularecologist.com). I love their paper and topic features, as well as their series on How Molecular Ecologists Work.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

If you are not happy somewhere, leave. As a postdoc, you're often working without a formal type of contract, and being able to leave a position when you want to is one of the very few benefits of that situation.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

I made tons of mistakes, and I still make mistakes. I tell my mentees all the time that everyone makes mistakes, but the difference is that intelligent people learn from them and/or figure out the best way to fix them.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

In high school, I was a decent classical and jazz trombonist, and I even had an offer to go to music school.


 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Emily Josephs
Assistant Professor
Plant Biology
Michigan State University
http://josephslab.github.io
Start date: January 2019

PhD: University of Toronto; Advisors: John Stinchcombe and Stephen Wright.
Postdoc: University of California, Davis; Advisors: Graham Coop and Jeff Ross-Ibarra.

About the department:

The Plant Biology department at Michigan State is really neat because there are great plant evolutionary biologists and ecologists and also great plant biologists who work on cellular, molecular, and physiological questions but are interested in thinking about how their work relates to evolution. MSU has lots of faculty in other departments doing evolutionary biology too. It's been really fun so far.

About the research:

We're broadly interested in understanding how various evolutionary forces shape patterns of genetic variation and trait variation in natural and domesticated plant species. Questions in this realm include: Why does genetic variation persist within populations and across species ranges? How do plants adapt to their local environments (if they do)? What evolutionary forces shape genotype x environment interactions? We tackle these questions using population genomic and quantitative genetic techniques with a focus on thinking about quantitative traits and gene expression.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Decision fatigue. It's been pretty exhausting to constantly make choices ranging from small (What kind of pipettes to buy? Which program should I pitch this grant idea to?) to large (Who to hire? What projects to focus on?). It feels like these decisions will have really big consequences for my next few years, so I end up spending a lot of time on them. I've only been here for six months, so still don't really know how to cope with this, but it has helped to get advice from other professors. I'm hoping that over time it will all fall into place, or, I'll get so busy that I won't have time to wallow over decisions and I'll just make them.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

It's a little lonely! I thought that having my own office would be the best, but I actually miss having officemates who I see every day.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

I am recruiting! The most important thing as I start the lab is finding lab members who are excited about the science we do and will be good lab citizens who contribute to a supportive lab environment.

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

During the evolution meeting in Ottawa (2012), there was a march on Canadian Parliament to protest the Harper government's anti-science policies. It was organized during lunchtime and I think a lot of people just wandered into it sort of accidentally. I lived in Canada then so I had pretty strong feelings about the politics, but I remember being really amused to look around and see a bunch of non-Canadian scientists enjoying themselves on the march too. It was sunny and Parliament Hill is really pretty, so I think everyone had a pretty good time.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first evolution meeting (and conference in general) was in Portland in 2010. I was driving from my parents' house in Los Angeles to Toronto, where I'd start my PhD, and I stopped on the way. I remember being so amazed at the breadth of science being discussed at the meeting and I totally wore myself out running from talk to talk. I gave my first ever poster and was pretty anxious, especially because none of my former mentors were at the meeting, but everyone that came to my poster was so friendly and supportive. Being at that meeting made me really feel like I was part of a larger evolutionary biology community and I also met a couple of (then) graduate students who are now good friends.

Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

I haven't started teaching at MSU yet, but I remember from my years TA-ing a human genomics and evolution course that students were really amazed by the idea that you could use genomic variation to understand the past. My co-TA, Robert Williamson, wrote this beautiful mini-lecture walking through a paper using genomic variation to infer timing and strength migration events in Caribbean humans, and we got a lot of positive feedback about it.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

During my postdoc, I started keeping a bullet-style journal to organize my daily, weekly, and monthly goals and that's been really helpful for keeping focus. I like being able to look back and see how I've been using my time. This is helpful for noticing things like "wow, I really spend too much time writing emails" and for banishing imposter syndrome thoughts like "I haven't gotten anything done today." (Yes, I did get stuff done, but what I got done was writing a lot of emails!!).

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

I don't have a specific book but, instead, a suggestion that evolutionary biologists should read non-science books too. A friend gave me this advice when I started grad school and I've found that it's really helpful for me to spend time thinking about stuff that isn't work. I recently read the Ancillary Justice series by Ann Leckie, which I really loved, and now I'm working my way through Grant by Ron Chernow, which is a bit daunting to be honest because it's a really big book!

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I love biking now, but I actually didn't learn how to ride a bike until I was 21. I worked in Annie Schmitt's lab as an undergrad and she sent me to the Max Planck Institute in Cologne to work on a common garden experiment for a summer. I got there and realized that the only way to really get around was by bike, so I ended up spending the first weekend learning. I fell down a lot, it was pretty embarrassing.

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


View full page

The SSE Education and Outreach Committee is involved in a number of different activities and events. We welcome SSE members interested in serving on the committee or joining one of the following working groups associated with a particular activity or event. To volunteer, please indicate your interest when joining the Society or renewing your membership

A brief description of each of the activities is below.

  

Professional Development Workshop for Undergraduate Educators (PDUE)

PDUE was developed to meet the needs of SSE members who are also involved in undergraduate education.  The workshop addresses a variety of topics, often with a focus on pedagogy. The workshop is held at the annual Evolution meeting.

Working group members are expected to assist with the following:

  • Identify theme
  • Contact and arrange speakers and activities for workshop
  • Interface with SSE Education Committee Chair and/or meeting organizers about food preferences.
  • Follow up with speakers to organize reimbursements which get submitted to either the SSE Education and Outreach Committee Chair or the SSE EVP.

 

Education Symposium

The Education Symposium is a half-day symposium at the annual Evolution meeting for highlighting education-related topics. Working group members are expected to assist with the following:

  • Identify theme
  • Contact and arrange speakers
  • Interface with SSE Education Committee Chair and/or meeting organizers registration
  • Follow up with speakers to organize reimbursements which get submitted to either the SSE Education and Outreach Committee Chair or the SSE EVP.

 

Evolution Film Festival

The Evolution Film Festival is a contest for creative short films about evolution in which the top-ranked films are shown and voted on at the annual Evolution meetingWorking group members will assist Jory Weintraub in organizing and executing the Festival.

 

Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution (UDE)

UDE is a program for undergraduate students from diverse backgrounds to attend the annual Evolution meeting and includes travel funding, lodging and meeting registration, and participation in various professional development opportunities.

Working group members are expected to assist with the following:

  • Implementation of all aspects of the application process
  • Review of applicants in collaboration with other sub-committee members
  • Arranging travel
  •  Interfacing with meeting organizers to arrange housing, registration, and programmatic details (professional development workshop on Friday, some type of social event, any other events)
  • Organize and submit all reimbursements for items not covered up front

 

T.H. Huxley Award

This award named in honor of Darwin's very public supporter T. H. Huxley, was established in 2013 to recognize outreach and education achievement for early and mid career scientists.  Winners of this award are provided with support to present on behalf of the Society for the Study of Evolution at the annual meeting of the National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT) as well as $500 for supplies. Working group members are expected to assist with the following:

  • Advertise the application to the program.
  • Review applicants.
  • Send acceptance and rejection emails.
  • Work with Jacki Pepin Reeves at NABT to make arrangements for presentation.
  • Handle all reimbursements - send file to the SSE Education and Outreach Committee Chair who will forward to the SSE EVP.

 

Small Grants Program for Local and Regional Outreach Promoting the Understanding of Evolutionary Biology

This program funds local and regional educational outreach activities each year. It is our hope that these projects will lead to ongoing outreach collaboration in future years. Preference will be given to new collaborations, but extensions of previously projects that have evidence of success are allowed.  Rob Pennock oversees the grant solicitation and review process together with Sam Scheiner. Working group members are expected to assist with the following:

  • Advertise the program and announce open application periods.
  • Review applicants.
  • Send acceptance and rejection emails.
  • Handle all reimbursements - send file to the SSE Education and Outreach Committee Chair who will forward to the SSE EVP.

 

USA Science and Engineering Festival

SSE participates in this outreach event held in Washington DC every other year.  We welcome anyone interested in volunteering. https://usasciencefestival.org/


View full page

SSE is aware that historical and modern-day cultural biases as well as lack of diversity in an applicant pool may lead to biases in the allocation of grants, prizes, and awards. Beginning with the 2020 Graduate Research Excellence Grant competitions, SSE will request voluntary demographic information from award applicants in an effort to address bias and promote equity in awarding across multiple axes of diversity. 

IMPORTANTLY:

  1. Answering demographic questions is voluntary — each question includes an option not to answer and applicants may choose to answer as many or as few questions as they wish.
  2. Information on identity will NOT be available to the evaluation committee during the first step of the evaluation process—the scoring and ranking of application materials.
  3. These data will be a tool to assess the diversity of overall applicant pools and address differences between the composition of the applicant pools and the awardee population. 

SSE will request information on the following identities:

  • Racial/ethnic identity
  • Sexual orientation identity
  • Gender identity
  • Ability identity
  • Socioeconomic identity

Starting in 2020 (the first year of implementation), application scores may be used in conjunction with demographic data in a second scoring step. This step would adjust rankings to reflect the overall diversity of the applicant pool in the final award distribution. Data in other identity categories will be collected to assess any areas of potential bias in soliciting and distributing awards in these categories, with the possibility of further adjustments to our procedures for advertising, collecting, and evaluating applications and nominations in the future.

DATA PRIVACY STATEMENT: Upon completion of each competition, answers to demographic questions will be anonymized and disassociated with all identifying information. Anonymized responses will be archived in order to analyze the composition of applicant pools over time. 




View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Genevieve Kozak
Assistant Professor
Biology
University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth
https://kozaklab.weebly.com/
Start date: September 2018

PhD: University of Wisconsin-Madison; Advisor: Dr. Jenny Boughman.
Postdoc: Tufts University; Advisor: Dr. Erik Dopman. Postdoc, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Dr. Becky Fuller.
 
 

About the department:

I am an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biology at UMass-Dartmouth. We have a recently developed Ph.D. program in Integrative Biology. We also have M.S. programs in Biology and Marine Biology. Our undergraduate Biology program offers students the ability to specialize in different options: Marine Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Conservation Biology, Cellular and Molecular Biology.

About the research:

I study how assortative mating evolves during speciation. My research program focuses on genomic and epigenomic mechanisms that produce mating behavior divergence and if these mechanisms are altered in changing environments. My work integrates animal behavior, evolutionary ecology, genetics, and genomics. By identifying the underlying mechanisms of mate choice, we can gain insight into how barriers initially arise and the selective pressures that may drive their evolution. We can also predict how continuing environmental change will influence sexual selection within species and hybridization among species.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

Mentoring is a very important part of being a PI and one I find personally very rewarding. I try to provide as many opportunities for students to grow as scientists as possible, from attendance at meetings to inclusion in all aspects of the science I do (manuscripts, grant writing, reviews).

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

I am recruiting graduate students for the lab. I choose potential students based on overlapping research interests and how I feel they will interact with my growing research group.

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I became an SSE member in 2008 to attend the Evolution meeting that year.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first meeting was Minneapolis in 2008. It introduced me to a number of amazing scientists, both senior and at my own level, that I still interact with today.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

Yes, I was so excited when my first paper (on mutual mate choice in stickleback fish) was accepted to Evolution in 2009.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

Throughout my career, I have been involved in outreach activities for young women, such as Expanding Your Horizons, STEM4girls, and summer science camps. I think it is important for female scientists to have role models to encourage broader participation in science.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Don't be afraid of failure! Everyone has experiments fail, everyone has papers get rejected. Learn something from these experiences and move on.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

If I didn't become a biologist, I would have become a historian.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Diogo Borges Provete
Assistant Professor
Ecology/Institute of Biosciences
Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul
http://diogoprovete.weebly.com
Start date: September 2017

Master's advisors: Denise de C. Rossa-Feres and Itamar A. Martins.
PhD: Federal University of Goiás; Advisor: Adriano S. Melo.
Postdoc: Göteborgs Universitet (Sweden) and Federal University of São Carlos at Sorocaba (Brazil); Advisor: Alexandre Antonelli (Sweden) and Fernando R. da Silva (Brazil). 

About the department:

I’m a professor at the Ecology group of our institute. The Federal Univ Mato Grosso do Sul is the largest public university in the state, and the 4th largest in central Brazil (https://www.ufms.br/en/). We are in a strategic position to conduct biodiversity research, because natural areas of Pantanal (world's largest wetland), Cerrado, and Atlantic Forest are all within a few hours drive.

About the research:

In my research program, I’m especially interested in synthesizing metacommunity ecology and micro- and macroevolution. My ultimate goal is to understand how the interaction between microevolutionary processes at the population change trait distribution and scale up to influence patterns at the metacommunity scale. We usually address this question by using phylogenetic comparative methods to analyze life history traits and vertebrates as a model group. Current projects of grad students in the lab involve estimation of macroevolutionary adaptive landscape of tadpoles and bats. Another approach we are starting to explore is to measure traits that are related to dispersal ability and competitive hierarchy of frogs in the field.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

We are facing a big shortage of public funding for research in Brazil since 2016. These are tough times and early carreer researchers tend to be more affected by these cuts. This blog post really summarizes this feeling.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

I received many requests of prospective students to join the lab since I arrived almost two years ago, including PhD students. I really didn't expect that.

How have you prepared to be a PI?

I have tried to develop some skills that I think are key to this new position, such as personal organization, mentorship techniques, team management, and project management. So I went on and read a couple of books about these subjects and it helped a lot. But I keep learning every day from my own students. I'm still learning how to deal with international students, for example.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

We have weekly meetings when all students talk about their projects and also have our own journal club. These actions give students opportunities to talk about the development of their research and also discuss ideas that we could incorporate in further lab projects.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

Yes! I'm always interested in new, enthusiastic PhD and Master's students. We usually agree on a project that at the same time interests students and try to contribute to answer the broad question of my research program. Our only limitation now is the amount of fellowships available in our grad program.

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I became a student member of SSE in 2010 when I was transitioning from master's to PhD. I always liked reading papers from the journal Evolution and at the time I was beginning to be more interested in questions and approaches at the intersection between ecology and evolution.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

By being a member of SSE I feel I'm part of the scientific community and can take advantage of the opportunities the society offers to its members, such as small grants and travel awards.

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

Believe it or not I haven't attended any Evolution meeting, so I still don't have any fun story.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

I have still not published any paper in Evolution. But as the projects in the lab develop, we plan to submit at least two papers from master's students.

If you could meet one other SSE member for the first time, who would it be and why?

Jonathan Losos, I really like his approach using Anoles and his papers have always been an inspiration to me and my students.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I try to spread the word about new papers using Twitter in both Portuguese and English. But I'm usually enjoying chatting with kids in schools via Skype a Scientist. This has been a great experience and I intend to make it more often.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

I don't teach an undergrad course in evolution, but I try to always teach community ecology and urban ecology with an evolutionary approach in mind. It's been hard to explain drift to students and how it interacts with other microevolutionary processes to influence trait distribution.

What concept blows students’ minds?

In the courses I teach I always talk about contemporary evolution, i.e., changes in the frequency distribution of traits in short time scales. I usually use the long-term experiment with anoles in the Caribbean.

How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

We are always concerned about virus and bacterial infections as a public health problem. Without knowing how the populations of these pathogens evolve we can't design efficient vaccines and antibiotics.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

I apply the Getting Things Done (GTD) approach and I can say that it saves my life. I really recommend it.

What is your favorite app?

I've been using iNaturalist a lot these days to document wildlife around me.

Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

Blogs Dynamic Ecology, Eco-Evo Evo-Eco; podcasts Pillars of Biodiversity, Major Revisions.

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

All the classics from the New Synthesis, specially "Tempo and Mode in Evolution" by G. G. Simpson.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Read! Read! Read! Reading is maybe the most important and defining thing as a grad student. Join journal clubs and seminars as much as possible, try to split up your time between courses, research projects, and other activities, but always leaving enough time to read key papers in your area. Ideally develop a routine, such as read one paper a day, no matter what.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Enjoy your free time, it will end soon :) Kidding! But my time as a postdoc is something I often miss, because I had more time to write papers and think almost exclusively about science, instead of dealing with paperwork. So, my personal advice is: try to improve your time management skills effectively and don't only focus on writing papers, but also try to engage in teaching as much as possible.

How was your first faculty meeting?

A little bit complicated, we were discussing the distribution of rooms and not everything went fine.

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

I remember when I gave an oral presentation at the annual meeting of Ecological Society of America about a master's paper (my first travel abroad and second presentation in English) and at the end one person came and made a question that basically destroyed everything I'd done... It was fun.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I have a double citizenship: Brazilian and Italian.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I usually spend my free time with my family, sometimes reading by the pool.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Marjorie Gail Weber
Assistant Professor
Department of Plant Biology & Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, & Behavior Program
Michigan State University
http://www.theweberlab.com/
Start date: August 2016

PhD: Cornell University; Advisor: Anurag Agrawal.
Postdoc: University of California, Davis; Advisor: I had a programmatic fellowship (the CPB Postdoctoral fellowship) with three co-sponsors: Sharon Strauss, Santiago Ramirez, Peter Wainwright. 
 

About the department:

I am an assistant professor in the Department of Plant Biology at Michigan State University. I am also a member of the cross-departmental program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior at MSU. Michigan State is a wonderful place to be a biologist! As a large agricultural institution, MSU really values biology research and teaching. Also, we are home to the incredible Kellogg Biological Station!

About the research:

Research in my lab focuses on understanding how ecological interactions have shaped the striking diversity of life that has evolved on our planet. We study cooperative and antagonistic interactions between plants and insects, and evaluate hypotheses that link these interactions with macroevolutionary patterns across scales. We work in many systems, including ant-plant and ant-mite mutualisms, plant defense, and plant-pollination interactions. Together, our work lies at the nexus of ecology and evolutionary biology, and seeks to understand the role that species interactions have played in shaping branches of the tree of life. My lab is also home to Project Biodiversify, an online space that provides methods and materials for inclusive teaching practices in biology college classrooms.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Too much stuff to do, not enough time to do it! Time management and juggling new (and old) responsibilities is a constant challenge. Despite all of the multi-tasking, I do love the variety of ways that I use my brain every day and all of the learning that goes with it. It really is a great job. I get the joy (and challenge) of wearing about 10 different hats each day as I bounce around from task to task. It isn’t boring, that’s for sure!

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

I’m surprised at how hard teaching is. My professors always made it look easy. Teaching new courses takes so much behind-the-scenes preparation. I feel like I should write my old professors letters thanking them for all the hard work they were doing that I didn’t fully appreciate at the time!

How have you prepared to be a PI?

Lots of good mentoring from my past advisors. I have been lucky to have such a wonderful team of people in my corner helping me figure out how to do this job. I learned so much from my PhD advisor, (Anurag Agrawal) and my postdoc advisors (Sharon Strauss, Santiago Ramirez, and Peter Wainwright). Watching them and asking questions was the best preparation I could have asked for.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

I love mentoring! I believe it is one of the primary ways I will make an impact in my job. Every student/lab member is different of course, so my mentoring philosophy is focused on individual approaches and a lot of honesty and openness. Overall though, I want folks in the lab to have independence and ownership of their projects and to find happiness and fulfillment in their scientific pursuits. I find that mentoring is one of the most rewarding and energy-giving parts of being faculty. I am continuously surprised by the variety of insights, the creativity, and the passion for science my lab members and undergraduate students display. They all give me so much hope for the world we live in!

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

I am not actively recruiting right now, but I am always open to talking with people who are interested in the lab. If that is you, don’t hesitate to reach out!

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I became a SSE member sometime in early graduate school. I have always loved evolutionary biology so much (and still do!). I couldn’t wait to join. A group of other people who are equally obsessed with the same cool biology you are into? It doesn’t get much better than that!

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

I’ve loved evolutionary biology for so long, and had dreamt of becoming a professional evolutionary biologist. Becoming an SSE member was very celebratory for me. I was officially an evolutionary biologist!

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

In graduate school I won the Rosemary Grant Award. It was the first year the award existed, and Rosemary Grant was there to hand them out herself. I was SO excited to meet her that I couldn’t wait for the ceremony, I just ran up to her as soon as I saw her and said “Hi, I won the YOU award!” I immediately realized I was acting like an awkward overly excited fan and then I got nervous and forgot what to say and just gawked at her silently. She, of course, was super nice and proceeded to ask me lots of nice questions and be very forgiving of my superfan-dom.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution meeting was in 2012 in Ottawa. It was an incredible experience for me. It really was like a dream! I felt like I had found my people, and I couldn’t get enough of the science.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

Yes, I definitely remember! It was a huge milestone for me. I had always wanted to publish in Evolution. In fact, as an undergrad, I won a small departmental award and the prize was a subscription for a year to the journal of my choice. I chose Evolution, and I was so excited to read every issue when it was delivered to my house. I would read it cover to cover, and I refused to throw out the copies (I moved them with me at least four separate times). It wasn’t until my postdoc that I actually had my first Evolution paper. I was so excited that I wrote to the editor to tell them about my undergraduate journal subscription obsession and what the first publication in Evolution meant to me. I was just so proud of myself. I felt like I was looking at myself from the past, and I was finally a bonafide evolutionary biologist.

If you could meet one other SSE member for the first time, who would it be and why?

Mary Jane West-Eberhard. I have been a fan of hers for so long, and I have never met her!

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I promote science through a smorgasbord of teaching and outreach activities, any number of which could be going on at a given time. One major effort is Project Biodiversify, spearheaded by a postdoc in my lab – Dr. Ash Zemenick – and funded through NSF. Project Biodiversify promotes diversity and inclusion in classrooms, providing workshops on teaching topics surrounding sex and gender, as well as a set of tools for humanizing scientists in classrooms. As part of this effort, we are building a repository of easy-to-use teaching slides that highlight a diverse set of scientists as role models in lectures. We are looking for more submissions, so please contact us if you want to nominate yourself or others! Aside from our work with Project Biodiversify, we also have an artist-in-residence program in the lab, through which we host artists and promote communication across the art/science interface, and we do our best to talk to the public in outreach events whenever possible.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

I teach about evolution in my ecology class. I think one of the hardest things to get is the notion that natural selection is not forward thinking. That is just such a pervasive misconception.

What concept blows students’ minds?

I love teaching about the absolute wonder associated with knowing that all things are connected via a common ancestor. I really like to dwell on that. I mean, wow.

How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

Evolutionary research benefits society in so many ways. The obvious points about antibiotic resistance, human and crop diseases, agricultural breeding programs are all true of course. Beyond that, in the time of climate change, an understanding of evolution has never been more important. And ultimately, evolution research tells us who we are and where we came from.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

Focus on managing your energy, not your time. When you re-focus to thinking about your energy, it helps you be a better whole person, and that will lead to you being a more productive, impactful scientist.

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

Wow, EVERY evolutionary biologist?! I guess The Origin of Species?! But probably also Coyne and Orr. And then probably also Dune. :)

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

You were motivated to go to graduate school because of some passion of yours (either a passion for the natural world, for the mysteries of how evolution works, etc.). Whatever that feeling is for you, my advice is to prioritize and protect it fiercely, not because it is fragile, but because it is priceless. We are so incredibly lucky to have the opportunity to go to graduate school (we actually get paid to learn about the world!). But at the same time, graduate school can sometimes have a way of deprioritizing our energy-giving passions for goal-oriented strategies (get more papers out, write more grants, etc). These goals are good of course (and so is strategy, as it helps you continue getting jobs doing the things you love doing), but all of it is useless if you lose sight of why you are doing this in the first place. Protect your enthusiasm, don’t let any negative vibes outweigh your awesome love of science. You got this!

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Enjoy the free time and the meandering days of doing just research! But also, if you are feeling down about the slog of applying to jobs and the culture of comparison that goes with that, you aren’t alone. It is totally normal for that part of the pipeline to be a bit of a drag. But don’t take that as a message that you aren’t cut out for this! I’m here from the other side to tell you that it gets better once you get through those dang applications! Also, see the advice for graduate students above.

How was your first faculty meeting?

Not as exciting as I imagined it would be.

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

Once I had complete laryngitis at a meeting. My friend Will Wetzel kindly agreed to read out written notes from my slides for me while I stood there and gesticulated wildy at the images. It was.. ridiculous. People filmed it.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

Who doesn't make mistakes as a trainee?! I absolutely made (and make) many mistakes. My recovery strategy entails reminding myself that I am more than just my CV. How do I do that? I go hang out with the people who love me no matter how many field seasons fail or how many grants are rejected, I make something delicious for dinner, I spend some time painting or reading a novel, and I remember that I am much more than just my successes or failures as a scientist.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

When I was a kid I went to a camp where you learned how to do gymnastics on the back of a horse. It was wild. I could ride a horse while standing up with my arms out. Can’t do THAT anymore!

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

In my free time I love adventuring with my three year-old-daughter, my partner, and my large shaggy dog. I love being a parent and a scientist! When I find time between family-fun and science-fun I also like painting, doting over my house plants, and potlucking with friends.

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
  

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Nathaniel Sharp
Assistant Professor
Genetics Department
University of Wisconsin-Madison
https://sharp.genetics.wisc.edu
Start date: February, 2019

PhD: University of Toronto; Advisor: Aneil Agrawal.
Postdoc: University of British Columbia; Advisor: Sally Otto and Mike Whitlock.
 
 

About the department:

At UW Madison there are a lot of great departments doing biological research, but I’m particularly proud to be part of the Genetics Department, which has a long history of achievement, including in my field of evolutionary genetics. There are also incredible programs across the university to facilitate outreach and education, which is really inspiring.

About the research:

Mutation creates the genetic variation that allows evolution to happen, but the mutation process itself is also subject to evolutionary forces. The opportunities for populations to adapt and persist will depend on the nature of spontaneous mutations: how often they appear, their spectrum of effects on genome sequences, and their consequences for individual fitness and population growth. My lab will study these features of the mutation process by doing intensive experiments with yeast and fruit flies, combining predictions from theoretical population genetics, experimental evolution strategies like mutation accumulation, next-gen sequencing and computational genomics.

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

I’d like my lab members to appreciate that doing science is a continual process, and we all have to be prepared to adapt as we go along. Even PIs make mistakes—what matters is that we keep learning from each other.

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

The party at the end of Portland 2010 was at the zoo, but I got so caught up with talking to people that I forgot to look at any animals. Happily, I got another chance at the 2017 meeting.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

My first paper was published in Evolution. The reviews were quite positive, and not much revision was needed. My advisor warned me not to expect future submissions to go that smoothly—and he was right! Still, I think that early experience was encouraging.

How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

So many issues facing society come down to basic questions evolutionary biologists have been addressing for decades. Now that we’re in the genomic era, I especially hope that biologists will be a part of the public conversation about what we know—and don’t know—about human genetics and the consequences of genetic modifications.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Make communication and collaboration a part of your academic training. Your work will have a greater impact when you can communicate it to a broader audience and make synergistic connections with others. Building a network of colleagues will have benefits down the road, including for job hunting.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

I once sorted about a thousand flies, only to throw out the type I actually needed for an experiment. I learned that, while going for drinks with your lab mates is great, it’s best to go after you’ve done your lab work, and not before.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I like cooking the kind of meals that are entirely improvised. Madison has lots of great areas for biking and boating, so I've been enjoying exploring outside.


 


 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Vanessa Koelling
Assistant Professor
Biology and Environmental Science
Auburn University at Montgomery
http://www.sciences.aum.edu/profile?email=vkoellin@aum.edu
Start date: August 2018

PhD: University of Georgia; Advisor: Rodney Mauricio.
Postdoc: University of Kansas; Advisor: John Kelly.
Other position(s): Visiting Assistant Professor at the University of Puget Sound.
 
 

About the department:

Auburn University at Montgomery is a regional campus of Auburn University located in Alabama’s capital city. AUM is Alabama’s most ethnically diverse campus with students from over 40 nationalities. Many students are the first in their family to attend college. I am an Assistant Professor in the Department of Biology and Environmental Science. I teach Introductory Biology and Bioinformatics courses.

About the research:

My research aims to understand which evolutionary mechanisms are most important in plant mating system evolution and speciation, and to understand the causal genetic changes underlying plant adaptations. I currently study these topics using the common yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus), a wildflower endemic to the Western United States and an important model system in evolutionary biology. I am also beginning to study the population genetics and ecophysiology of two of Alabama’s native azaleas (Rhododendron cumberlandense and Rhododendron prunifolium) in collaboration with researchers at Auburn’s Davis Arboretum and Holden Forests and Gardens in Ohio.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

My primary responsibility at AUM is to be an excellent teacher, and I currently teach mostly large introductory biology classes in which students need a lot of my time and support. My biggest challenge so far as a new PI is finding time to get my lab set up and teach new undergraduate researchers the necessary skills to work in my lab. It's a slow but rewarding process!

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I joined SSE in 2002 as a new graduate student. At the time, I joined primarily for the discounted conference registration. Of course, now I'm a member because the SSE is an important professional connection and vital to the field of evolutionary biology through publication of Evolution and Evolution Letters, as well as organization of the annual Evolution meeting. And the conference discount is still a great perk!

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I'm a mentor for the PlantingScience program, which means I mentor several groups of middle school and high school students online each year as they do inquiry-based plant science projects. It's a lot of fun to help young people realize that they may have underestimated how interesting plants can be! I also manage the Facebook page for AUM's College of Sciences. My role there is mostly to promote the science going on at AUM, but I also try to find science news and events that will be of general interest to our followers and that will help them see the importance of scientific research.

Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

My favorite science podcast is the Science Magazine podcast. I think it's an excellent overview of some of the big news in science. Although I am completely biased in this view because the host, Sarah Crespi, is a good friend of mine from college.

How was your first faculty meeting?

Confusing! As a new person you kind of get thrown into the deep end of the pool in terms of understanding the ins and outs of university policies and procedures and departmental business. It's a steep learning curve, but you just have to take notes and ask questions. And thankfully you get a year or two to figure things out before you're asked to actually know much of anything!

 
 
 


 
 

 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Felipe Zapata
Assistant Professor
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
www.zapatalab.org
Start date: September 2016

PhD: University of Missouri-St. Louis; Advisor: Peter Stevens and Elizabeth (Toby) Kellogg.
Postdocs: Brown University; Advisor: Casey Dunn. UC Berkeley; Advisor: Paul Fine.
 
 

About the department:

The Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (EEB) at UCLA houses a large group of people doing research and teaching in a wide range of topics in ecology, evolution, behavior, and conservation. Our department has a strong focus on natural history and field biology. We even offer courses that are completely field-based and we can take students for a full quarter basically anywhere we want/can. We regularly teach field courses in Cameroon, Moorea, Australia, Peru, and throughout California.

About the research:

The questions that motivate my research revolve around understanding how evolution has generated biological diversity, in particular plant diversity. I am broadly interested in: a) discovering, documenting, and understanding species, b) examining how and why species form, multiply and diversify, and c) studying the mechanisms underpinning the amazing phenotypic variation seen across the (plant) tree of life. Research in my lab integrates multiple areas in biology, from field to computational biology.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

I think time management. There are so many things that now I have to do and I was not fully prepared for: meetings, administration, advising, preparing classes, mentoring, teaching, etc. And of course, I need to squeeze in time to keep doing my own research, write grants, and write papers.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

Yes, I am always interested to hear from people who would like to join the lab. Foremost, I look for people who are genuinely interested and curious about biology. I also choose people who will fit the lab in multiple ways, from being an independent, dedicated, and respectful individual, to someone who will be a good team member and will bring new ideas/skills to the lab that can help move our research forward.

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

2010 in Portland. It had a big influence in my career because since then it is the meeting that I try to attend every year. I really like the breadth of topics you get to see in this meeting and the amazing biology you learn about all sort of organisms.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

Yes, it was a paper in Evolution, part of my first postdoctoral research. It was such a great and positive experience. I remember we received very challenging but insightful comments from the reviewers and AE. I think that thanks to the high quality review and feedback, our manuscript improved a lot and the main ideas became more clear and punchier.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I am interested in collaborations with non-scientists to disseminate science to a broader audience. Last year, I participated in an academic symposium paired with visualizations and interpretations provided by artists, dancers, and musicians from Los Angeles. I worked with a puppeteer and a musician on a performance about multivariate analysis of morphology.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

I don’t teach Evolution but I teach Plant Diversity and Evolution. In this course, I teach a module in “tree thinking” and even though several students get the idea, many students still think about evolution as progress towards something “more complex”, “better”, “advanced”, etc. I use multiple examples, videos, problem sets, and lab activities to try to make these ideas less confusing.

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

Besides Darwin's Origin of Species, I think the 4 books from the New Synthesis (the first editions are the best): Stebbins, Dobzhansky, Simpson, and Mayr.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Work on a question that truly motivates you. If you are genuinely interested and passionate about something, you will become an independent, critical thinker, and will develop intellectual ownership of your project. The rest will come naturally (e.g., reading a lot and broadly, learning quantitative skills, finding free time to do other stuff, etc).

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Choose an advisor who will support your career and will help you get to where you want to go.

How was your first faculty meeting?

As intimidating as I expected it. After the first couple of meetings, it got better.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I enjoy outdoor activities (hiking, running, playing sports), going to concerts (all sorts of music), going to museums, cinema, and walking around LA.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
  
 


View full page

Text: Society for the Study of Evolution Lifetime Achievement Award, Nominations due September 30. A background of gold star confetti and a gold trophy.

About

The Lifetime Achievement Award recognizes individuals who have made substantial contributions to the study of evolution through conceptual advances, impactful publications, and/or outreach/education. Individuals who have demonstrated outstanding mentorship of trainees, provided noteworthy service to the evolution community, and/or contributed to the diversity and inclusion of the field will also be recognized. The awardee will be presented at the 3rd Joint Congress of Evolutionary Biology in Montreal, Canada, July 26-30, 2024. Recipients of this award will be invited to submit an accompanying article to Evolution (primary research, review, insight or commentary, fast-tracked through review and made freely available) within two months of the conference. Published articles would highlight the award obtained. See examples here and here.

Nomination Instructions

Complete the form below with your name, the nominee’s name, and two short descriptions of the nominee’s contributions to the field and community. You will also be asked if you would be willing to provide a longer and more detailed nomination letter at a later date. SSE values the contributions of diverse researchers and encourages nominators to consider all potential mentors and colleagues. Self-nominations are welcome. Please submit your nomination by September 30, 2023.

small green button with the words Submit Nomination in white

DEADLINE: September 30, 2023



Previous Recipients

2023

Dr. Sarah "Sally" Otto was selected for her countless important contributions to evolutionary biology as a researcher, mentor, educator, and activist. As an outstanding researcher, Dr. Otto’s empirical and theoretical work on the evolution of ploidy, sex, and recombination has moved the field forward. As a mentor and educator, she has provided rigorous and accessible training to the next generation of biologists. As a member of the scientific community and citizen of the world, she has served in leadership roles for several scientific societies (the American Society of Naturalists (ASN), the European Society for Evolutionary Biology, the American Genetic Association, and SSE), co-founded the Canadian Society of Ecology and Evolution, and directs the Liber Ero Fellowship Program. At every level, Dr. Otto has worked towards bettering the environment—scientifically and globally, individually and collaboratively. Her achievements have been recognized with a number of awards (including the Darwin-Wallace Medal from the Linnean Society, the Sewall Wright Award from ASN, the MacArthur Foundation "genius grant", National Academy of Sciences membership, and Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada), and we are delighted to honor her with the Lifetime Achievement Award for 2023. Watch Dr. Otto's award talk at Evolution 2023.

2022

Dr. Marcus Feldman is the Burnet C. and Mildred Finley Wohlford Professor of Biology, founder and director of the Morrison Institute for Population and Resource Studies, and co-director of the Center for Computational, Evolutionary and Human Genomics at Stanford University. His innovative research has contributed to our understanding of the evolution of recombination and sex, human population genetics, niche construction, and evolutionary theory. With Dr. Luca Cavalli-Sforza, Dr. Feldman also developed a new field termed cultural evolution, which studies how genetic and cultural variation can interact and affect one another. Over the course of his career, he has mentored numerous trainees, from high school students to postdocs, and was awarded the Allan V. Cox Medal for Fostering Undergraduate Research at Stanford and  the Stanford Biosciences Excellence in Mentoring and Service Award. In 1970, he co-founded the journal Theoretical Population Biology. He was also the Editor of The American Naturalist from 1984 to 1990. Dr. Feldman was named the Dan David Laureate in Evolution in 2011, and received the Motoo Kimura Prize in Human Evolution in 2016.

2021

Dr.Dr. Richard E. Lenski is the John Hannah Distinguished Professor of Microbial Ecology at Michigan State University (MSU). For more than 30 years, he has directed one of the most significant experiments in evolutionary biology, the E. coli Long Term Evolution Experiment (LTEE). He is one of the founding members of the BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action at MSU, and today serves on its executive committee. Dr. Lenski has previously received a Guggenheim Fellowship and a MacArthur Fellowship, and has been elected to the American Academy of Microbiology, the European Molecular Biology Organization, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the National Academy of Sciences. In addition to his outstanding research contributions, he is known for being an exceptional mentor and role model for up and coming evolutionary biologists. He also served the community as President of SSE in 2013.

2020

Dr. Charlesworth in a garden.Dr. Deborah Charlesworth has been a key champion for the field of evolutionary biology. Her wide-ranging work has led to crucial insights into some of the most important outstanding evolutionary questions. She has also shown a tireless commitment to mentorship and encouragement of young scientists in evolutionary biology as an exemplary mentor and role model. Furthermore, she has served the evolution community as president of both the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution and the European Society for Evolutionary Biology. 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Margarita Lopez-Uribe
Assistant Professor
Entomology
Penn State University
https://lopezuribelab.com/
Start date: October 2016

PhD: Cornell University; Advisor: Bryan Danforth.
Postdoc: NC State University; Advisor: Rob Dunn, David Tarpy, Steve Frank.
 
 

About the department:

I am an Assistant Professor in the Department of Entomology at Penn State University with a research and extension appointment. Because of my role as a pollinator extension specialist, I don’t teach undergraduate and graduate students. Instead, I teach beekeepers and growers about diverse fundamental and applied topics related to pollinators. I am also cross-appointed in the Intercollege Ecology Program at Penn State.

About the research:

My research program focuses on understanding how evolutionary history, ecological interactions and human management influence bee population responses to the unique biotic and abiotic conditions of agricultural ecosystems. My team is interested in understanding how crop domestication and agricultural intensification have facilitated rapid evolution in pollinator populations. Besides answering fundamental questions about the ecology and evolution of bees, we aim to generate information that will help develop improved management and breeding programs of crops and pollinators. The research in my lab focuses on two model systems: honey bees (domesticated/managed) and squash bees (wild specialist pollinators of Cucurbita crops).

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

Learning how to manage a lab, advise students, supervise staff, oversee budgets and accounts, and handle my own time, especially when there are always more and more things to do. How to be a good manager is not something that graduate school trains you for.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

Finding out what it actually means to be a PI: managing, advising, supervising, but also dealing with politics. On the other hand, another big surprise has been to see the development of a vision for my research and extension programs. This is something that we are asked for when we are applying for jobs, and to be honest, I did not have a solid idea of what I truly wanted to work on before I started my job. I have been developing that vision as I go and it has been shaped by new collaborations, student’s interests, and funding opportunities. I think the acquisition of a longer-term vision for my academic career has been a fun and important thing to develop as a new PI.

How have you prepared to be a PI?

I am still learning how to be a PI. As I said before, I do not think grad school fully prepares you for the job. Grad school prepares you to be a scientist (do quality research, write compelling proposals and papers, and teach) but it does not prepare you to deal with all the other things that it means to be a PI (account, people’s management, etc). I do wish could we start incorporating more formal training on all of these other aspects that are necessary to be a PI to holistically prepare Ph.D. students to be good at it!

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

Mentoring is one of the best parts of my job. I have a big lab and I am still learning how to be a good mentor. Mentoring is different for each student and it is a constant learning process. I meet with all my students every 2 weeks individually and we discuss progress on all ongoing projects. We alternate weeks of individual meetings with lab meetings. When we meet as a lab we have peer-review sessions or skill development short workshops. I’ve had different formats for lab meetings every year since I started my lab. To mentor students on project development, I usually give all first-year students a small project to get started with. I try to give them projects that align with their interests and previous experiences. Then, I expect each student to build on this initial project and develop a more independent project for the rest of the dissertation. For the most part, this strategy has worked out pretty well. Having a big lab brings an added value to interactions between members of the lab. In our group, students and postdocs talk a lot to each other and those interactions really help them advance in their projects and brainstorm about cool ideas for future projects. The downside of a big lab is that there is less time for one-on-one with each member of the lab.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

I am not actively recruiting because of the large size of my lab. However, I always consider applications from students who have interests that align well with the goals and vision of my group.

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I have been a member since 2011. I became a member because of my interest in questions in ecology and evolution. My dissertation work was on phylogeography and population genetics. The Evolution meetings offer a great opportunity to learn where the field is, and what others are working on. I also became a member because of the funding opportunities for grad students.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

It has provided a great opportunity to network. Because I have been associated with departments of Entomology since I was a grad student, I have been very active in the Entomology Society of America meeting in recent years. It’s been difficult to go to so many meetings every year. I miss the Evolution meetings though so I plan to attend the one in Cleveland this year.

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

My first evolution meeting was in Norman, OK. I took a taxi from the dorms to the conference and when the taxi driver heard I was going to the convention center, he asked me if I was one of those crazy people who *believed* in evolution (!).

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

It was in 2011 in Norman OK. I remember enjoying every talk I listened to. This does not happen in every scientific meeting :)

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

I have never published in Evolution or Evolution Letters. This is a goal that I have for the near future.

If you could meet one other SSE member for the first time, who would it be and why?

Loren Rieseberg. I am a fan of his work.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

I try to write an extension article or blog for every scientific paper that we publish in the lab. This is a way to communicate the findings of every paper to a much broader audience. Some of these follow-up articles are published in trade magazines that are read by beekeepers and growers every month.

Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

I don’t teach students. However, when I am constantly giving extension talks and I tell beekeepers and growers about the types of inferences that can be made from genetics markers, they are always shocked.

Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

No. I do a lot of outreach but not specifically about evolution. However, I do talk about the results of my research on historical demography and population genetics of bees when I give extension talks. Many of the participants of these talks and workshops are always amazed by the type of inferences that can be drawn with genetic data.

How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

Evolutionary theory is fundamental to understand the biological world as it is constantly changing. This is important for medicine, agriculture, conservation, and beyond. Indeed, I think that my background in evolutionary biology is highly relevant to my work as an extension specialist in agricultural pollinators (even though most people don’t see the direct link between the two fields).

How do you advocate for diversity and inclusion in academia and your workplace?

Working on topics of diversity and inclusion has been one of my goals as a faculty member. As I have moved up the academic ladder, it has become increasingly evident that the standards in academia are dictated by a dominant culture that often does not welcome or value traits from people that do not historically “belong” to academia. As chair of the new Diversity and Inclusion committee in my department, I am actively working on generating opportunities to increase awareness about these topics and to help build a more inclusive environment. I am very passionate about this topic and I value the efforts that SSE is taking in this front.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

Have a calendar (this is a must). Make a list of daily, weekly, monthly and semester goals. Block at least one hour (more if you can) of productive writing every day.

What is your favorite app?

Google drive and Evernote.

Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

I love the Molecular Ecologist and Small Pond Science.

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

For sure, On the Origin of Species. My textbook for evolution during college was Evolution by Douglas Futuyma. That book provided a great foundation for concepts. I read it from cover to cover.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Work hard but have fun! Enjoy what you do during grad school. It is demanding but it is a time of growth and so much learning. Surround yourself by positive and constructive people. That will help you overcome some of the difficulties of navigating the academic world. Besides faculty mentors, have more senior grad students and postdocs as mentors.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

Try to gain different skills from the ones you have. This is usually tough because postdocs usually get hired for the skills that they have and what they can bring to projects. Increasing your skill set will increase your “marketability” for academic jobs. My postdoc years were the best time to focus on research and work on what I really enjoyed. Best time of my academic career!

How was your first faculty meeting?

It was ok but intimidating. It took me a while to mentally transition from being a postdoc to being an assistant professor and see many of the big names in my department as colleagues.

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

Yes. Once, I gave a talk where all the figures were upside down in the powerpoint. It was terrible. I did my best to explain the figures but I am not sure I did a good job with it. It was a short talk though so the uncomfortable situation did not last too long.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

Many! I just kept trying until things worked out. I also used to seek a lot of help from more senior grad students. I had many wonderful senior grad mentors throughout my career.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

I discovered my passion for bees in my junior year in college. I used to be afraid of bees and most insects as a kid.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I definitely prioritize spending time with my family (husband, 3 kids and parents) when I am not at work. I also try to exercise every day (running and now boxing) and going out salsa dancing whenever I can!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Gideon Bradburd
Assistant Professor
Integrative Biology
Michigan State University
genescape.org
Start date: August 2017

PhD: UC Davis; Advisor: Graham Coop and Brad Shaffer.
Postdoc: UC Berkeley; Advisor: Michael Nachman and Bree Rosenblum.
 
 

About the department:

I’m an assistant professor of Integrative Biology at Michigan State University. It’s a great community with an especially large cohort of junior faculty (10 pre-tenure faculty in my department alone!), so we all help each other navigate our new lives as professors. The only downside is that, between us, we have 8 kids in the same daycare, so when anyone gets sick, the whole department goes down like dominoes.

About the research:

Research in my lab is focused on understanding the role of geography in structuring patterns of population genetic variation and learning about the processes that shaped those patterns. To further this goal, we develop and implement novel population genetic models and statistical methods for describing population structure and admixture, as well as studying local adaptation and natural selection. Our work is highly interdisciplinary; it incorporates population genetics theory, computation, statistics and inference, and a knowledge of the natural history of the empirical systems – which range from bacteria to humans – in which we apply these methods.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

The transition from “what I do” to “what the Bradburd Lab does,” and learning how to push forward on so many things simultaneously. This part has gotten a little easier (and a lot more fun) as my lab has grown, but some days I still really miss the good old days when I was just working on one project at a time! It’s also been a challenge to distinguish between work that’s urgent and work that’s important, and to realize that a lot of time there isn’t a ton of overlap between the two. Now, I protect time and energy every day to work on the important stuff, to make sure I’m not dying the Death of a Thousand Emails (aka being nibbled to death by ducks).

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

I was surprised by how lonely it felt when I first started. You’re used to being in labs where you have a lot of peers thinking about similar ideas, but often, when you’re hired as an assistant professor somewhere, it’s because that institution doesn’t already have someone who does what you do, so when you show up, you’re the only one doing it. It helped a lot to lean on other SSE-ers; special shout-outs to Emily Josephs and David Lowry for our super awesome journal club, and to Yaniv Brandvain for our check-ins!

How have you prepared to be a PI?

I was very fortunate to have a network of really wonderful mentors, both formal and informal. I learned so much from the examples set by my PhD advisors (Graham Coop and Brad Shaffer), postdoc advisors (Michael Nachman and Bree Rosenblum), and informal mentors (Anurag Agrawal and Sharon Strauss). In difficult situations, I often find myself channeling them, sometimes even down to using the same phrases they did with me!

How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

I write a document of reciprocal expectations with all new lab members, so they know what I expect from them, and I know what they expect from me. It’s a living document, and we come back to it every semester to add or edit items. Different people prefer different mentorship styles, so this helps make sure that I can be the best mentor I can with each individual. Big picture, my goal with each lab member is to help them identify their career goals and plot a course to achieving professional satisfaction. It’s super fun and inspiring to work with such a great crew!

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

I’m not actively recruiting right now, but I’m always excited to talk to folks who are interested in the work we do. If you get jazzed thinking about spatial popgen, drop me a line!

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I became a member of SSE in grad school, and then, when I became an assistant professor, the first thing I paid for off my startup was a lifetime membership in the society. I love the SSE meetings (Evolution is definitely my favorite meeting to attend!), the intellectual community of the society, and of course also the journals the society supports.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

I remember there was a long time in grad school where I wasn’t sure whether or not I “counted” as a professional biologist yet (standard impostor syndrome stuff), and a big part of me feeling comfortable thinking about myself as the real deal was becoming a card-carrying member of SSE. Also, we should totally get cards to carry around!

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

I don’t know if I have any funny stories, but I definitely have a lot of nice memories. It’s always so fun to see old friends and make new ones, and, of course, hear about cool new science!

When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

My first Evolution meeting was in 2009 in Minneapolis. The poster session was on a bridge, and I just remember walking through all the posters and feeling like a kid in a candy-shop. That meeting was definitely confirmation for me that I wanted to be an evolutionary biologist.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

Of course! It was my first first-author publication, so I could never forget it. Actually, it was such a great experience that it set up totally unrealistic expectations for the rest of my career. The submission process was pretty smooth, the AE (Jon Wilkins) and the reviewers were all great and gave thoughtful feedback that made the paper better, and it was accepted with minor revisions, which has never happened for me since. I still have a hardcopy edition of that journal on the shelf in my office and it’s a prized possession.

If you could meet one other SSE member for the first time, who would it be and why?

Probably Deborah and Brian Charlesworth. They’ve just made so many contributions to the field, and they think and write so clearly. I think I’d learn a lot and have fun doing it.

Besides research, how do you promote science?

Right now, the majority of my science outreach efforts are directed at my 3-year-old daughter. We do a lot of natural history observation together on our walks; recently she’s been really excited about worms, slugs, and fungi, which feels like a biologist-parenting win.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

I teach evolution for grad students. I think one of the hardest concepts to convey is that no extant species is “more evolved” than any other extant species. I call it the X-men Fallacy, (“next step in human evolution”), and it’s surprisingly hard to get students on board.

Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

The coalescent. To be fair to students, it blows everybody’s minds.

How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

Well there are all the obvious things about medicine and conservation and feeding the world and learning about our own evolutionary history, but I also think that fundamental, non-applied research is important in its own right. We’re all pushing back the boundaries of human ignorance a little bit at a time, and I think that’s pretty neat.

Do you have a time management tip to share?

I’ve found the Boulders/Rocks/Sand framework very helpful for organizing my effort. Boulders are big things, like manuscripts, grants, hard coding/math, new class preps; rocks are mid-size things, like reviewing manuscripts or teaching a class you’ve taught before, and sand is the million other things that clamor for your attention. The idea is that, if your time is a jar, you can put in boulders (I guess it’s a big jar?), then fill the space between them with rocks, and then pour sand into whatever space is left. But if you start with sand, you can’t get rocks and boulders in. I try to protect time every day (usually in the morning, at peak caffeination) to push Boulders, and then fit Rocks and Sand around them. It’s so easy to fill up a day with things that feel like work, but that don’t actually move your research program forward, so protecting time for the big stuff is crucial.

What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

I think we should all be reading more Ursula Le Guin.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

Come up with lots of ideas for thesis projects and write them down! When you’re brainstorming, don’t get hung up on what’s possible, just think about a project that you think is cool. Then go through them and try to generalize – what connects these projects? Is it a particular system, or a phenotype, or a big open question in the field? Once you know, you can start to generate more targeted thesis ideas around that theme, and allow yourself to be more critical about what’s feasible. And remember, you don’t have to go it alone! Bounce your ideas off of your peers, your advisor, visiting speakers, other faculty, etc. As you narrow in on your thesis idea, I think it’s helpful to get more concrete: What is the title of your dissertation? What are the axis labels of Figure 1 of your dissertation? If your whole dissertation were summarized as a single data point in a meta-analysis, what would the title of that meta-analysis be? You can do it!

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

A postdoc can be a fun time in your career (lots of freedom, and not too many responsibilities), but it can also be hard. You’ve probably moved from wherever you did your PhD, so you might not have your friend community around you, and for some reason it seems like departments can never get their act together with postdocs. Like, you rarely make it onto mailing lists, and you maybe don’t show up in any directories. Plus, you’re putting yourself out there professionally all the time applying to jobs and (probably) experiencing a lot of rejection. So, my advice is: if you’re enjoying it, great! And if you’re having a hard time, it’s ok to have a hard time! Just try to be a good friend to yourself, and stay hydrated.

How was your first faculty meeting?

Total snoozefest.

Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

On one of the first invited seminars I gave, my computer was on a podium that had a slight slope. Slowly, and unbeknownst to me, my computer slipped down the podium over the course of my talk, until it eventually launched over the edge and crashed onto the floor. Someone in the back of the audience had fallen asleep, and when the computer fell he woke up and yelled a little bit.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

Never. No just kidding I made so many mistakes. I still make mistakes all the time. When I feel bad about them, I just try to remind myself that if you know exactly what you’re doing and you’re doing it perfectly, then you’re not pushing yourself hard enough to learn new things.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

Little known fact: I’ve eaten monkey. Context: Although almost all of my research is computational now, I originally got into biology through a bunch of fieldwork opportunities in exotic places. One time, on an expedition to a remote part of Suriname that a friend had invited me to join, our resupply plane failed to show up and we ran out of food. We all ate bushmeat until we could get back to the capital. Peccary was delicious, piranha was ok, although very bony, but monkey was very unpleasant. 0/5 stars would not recommend.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

In my free time I love cooking and baking, amateur carpentry, reading scifi, seeing friends, and going on walks with my partner, our three-year-old kid, and our big scruffly dog Banjo.


View full page

A glowing lightbulb hangs behind the text next to a headshot of Corey Welch, wearing a striped collared shirt and a binoculars strap around his neck, with the sky and top of the Grand Canyon behind him. Text: American Society of Naturalists, Society for the Study of Evolution, Society of Systematic Biologists, 2023 IDEA Award, Corey Welch, Inclusiveness, Diversity, Equity, Access.

2023 IDEA Award Winner: Dr. Corey Welch

Congratulations to the recipient of the 2023 IDEA Award, Dr. Corey Welch! 

Dr. Welch was selected for his wide range of work to broaden participation of students and professionals from diverse backgrounds in all areas of STEM. Using the latest research on student success and his training in vertebrate ecology and evolution, he established and now directs an award-winning undergraduate training program, the STEM Scholars Program at Iowa State University. During his work with the Society for the Advancement of Chicanos/Hispanics and Native Americans in Science (SACNAS), where he served on the board of directors for six years, Dr. Welch launched an ongoing mentoring program at the society’s annual meeting and has served as a facilitator for the Linton-Poodry SACNAS Leadership Institutes. In addition to this work, Dr. Welch has led more than 40 seminars and presentations, mainly at biology and EEB departments, on how to improve DEI in STEM. Most recently, Dr. Welch founded the Sharon Farr Welch Northern Cheyenne Tribal Scholarship program for students from his own Northern Cheyenne community to pursue higher education. 

Dr. Corey Welch will present his work during the IDEA Award Plenary at the in-person portion of the Evolution 2024 meeting in Montreal this July. This event will also be live-streamed for all meeting registrants.



 

About the IDEA Award

The ASN/SSE/SSB Inclusiveness, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA) Award was created in 2019 by the American Society of Naturalists (ASN), the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE), and the Society of Systematic Biologists (SSB). The IDEA Award is given to a person at any career stage who has strengthened the ecology and evolutionary biology community by promoting inclusiveness and diversity in our fields. The award can also be presented to a group. The recipient will receive a plaque at the annual meeting of ASN/SSB/SSE and a $1000 honorarium. Recipients are also encouraged to submit an accompanying article on their IDEA work (primary research, review, insight or commentary and made freely available) to the relevant ASN/SSE/SSB society journal. Published articles would highlight the award obtained. Nominations are due in January of each year.
 
 

Past Recipients

2022: Suchinta Arif and Melanie Duc Bo Massey

Congratulations to the recipients of the 2022 IDEA Award, PhD candidates Suchinta Arif and Melanie Duc Bo Massey, cofounders of the scientific outreach organization Diversity of Nature (DoN). Arif and Massey founded Diversity of Nature at Dalhousie University (Nova Scotia, Canada) in 2020. DoN is specifically designed to be led by BIPOC scientists and aimed at BIPOC youth, with the goal of increasing BIPOC representation in the natural sciences. DoN’s array of inclusive programming includes panels, workshops, and an annual field camp, all free of charge to participants. Arif and Massey have also led publications on actionable guidance for supporting and retaining underrepresented students in evolution and ecology and accrued impressive portfolios of additional teaching, outreach, and DEI-related activities. Thank you Suchinta and Melanie for your dedication to increasing BIPOC representation in the natural sciences!

2021: Adriana Briscoe

Dr. Briscoe smiling at the camera in front of a leafy green background. Her hair is brown and slightly curled and shoulder-length, and she wearsr a pearl necklace and dark blue top.Congratulations to Dr. Adriana Briscoe, recipient of the second annual ASN/SSE/SSB Inclusiveness, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA) Award. Over her entire career, Dr. Briscoe has shown a commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion that has resulted in the recruitment and retention of diverse scientists in the evolution workforce at all professional levels. Dr. Briscoe also contributes to international inclusion, regularly publishing research with co-authors from global south countries. Her DEI work also includes published scholarship and popular media related to her outreach. Dr. Briscoe has also been recognized for her research excellence and contributions to education by the largest STEM diversity organization in the country, the Society for the Advancement of Chicanos/Hispanics and Native Americans in Science (SACNAS). Thank you to Dr. Briscoe for your commitment and contributions to the community!

2020: Scott Edwards and Richard Kliman

Scott Edwards posing with bird specimens Rich Kliman smiling at the cameraThe recipients of the inaugural IDEA Award were Dr. Scott Edwards and Dr. Richard Kliman. Dr. Edwards and Dr. Kliman were selected for their steadfast commitment to increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion of underrepresented minorities in evolutionary biology. In 2001, they started the Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution (UDE) program to provide funding and mentorship for students to attend the annual Evolution meeting. Since its inception, nearly 250 US and international undergraduates have had the opportunity to participate. Thank you to Dr. Edwards and Dr. Kliman for your commitment and contributions to the community!


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Susana M. Wadgymar
Assistant Professor
Biology Department
Davidson College
smwadgymar.weebly.com
Start date: June 2018

PhD: University of Toronto; Advisor: Arthur Weis.
Postdoc: University of Georgia; Advisor: Jill Anderson.

About the department:

The Biology Department at Davidson College is large for an undergraduate institute and quite broad in scope, so our research programs span study systems, subfields, and biological levels of organization. I’m constantly inspired, motivated, and encouraged by my colleagues and by our incredibly driven and accomplished students. I enjoy the teaching, research, and service aspects of being a faculty member, and am grateful to work at a place where all three contributions are appreciated.

About the research:

My research program explores the evolutionary ecology of plants. We study the processes that promote or hinder adaptations in plants, with particular interests in the influences of genetics vs. the environment, climate change, and conservation. Current projects in the lab use manipulative experiments and demographic modeling to explore the adaptive nature of transgenerational plasticity, sex allocation strategies, and assisted gene flow.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

The feeling that nothing that I ever work on is finished to my satisfaction. With more time, I could have perfected a lecture, or sent a manuscript to a colleague on time and in better shape, or contributed more to a committee I was a part of, or attended an event in another department. I’m still learning how to let go, move on, stop apologizing, and to celebrate small accomplishments.

What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

I was surprised at how striking the transition from postdoc to PI was. I showed up at my new job one day and had an empty office and lab to start setting up, start-up funds to spend at my own discretion, and no one else to really hold me accountable for my time or productivity. It’s liberating, but it took a while for me to settle into a rhythm and feel like I was ‘doing it right’.

Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

Yes, I am continuously recruiting. One of the benefits of working at an undergraduate institution is that new students regularly join your lab for various amounts of time. This produces a dynamic and busy lab group with the regular addition of fresh perspectives. I look for students who are enthusiastic about science and are excited to collaborate with me and other lab members.

When and why did you become a SSE member?

I first joined SSE in 2012 when I attended the Evolution meeting in Ottawa. A lot of the literature I was reading at the time was published in Evolution, and I had heard wonderful things about the Evolution meetings. I remember noticing how laid back and supportive everyone was, and it helped me to envision myself as a part of the scientific community in the future.

What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

Attending Evolution meetings has provided me with invaluable opportunities for networking, practicing science communication, and expanding knowledge. I always feel invigorated and inspired by the talks that I see. And of course, the meetings are an irresistible opportunity to see old friends and make new ones in a safe, geeky space. I look forward to them each year that I can attend.

Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

At the 2013 Evolution meeting in Snowbird, UT, a few faculty, postdocs, and students took a lift up the mountain and then slid down the ski slope on our butts. In hind sight, it probably wasn’t the safest thing to do, but it was thrilling. That evening, I may have witnessed a leg wrestling match between two prominent professors in Evolutionary Biology. It was a fun and memorable conference.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

I remember it vividly. We struggled with choosing a journal to submit a manuscript to, and ended up deciding on Evolution Letters. It hadn’t produced an issue yet at that point, but its aims and scope appealed to us. The editor and reviewer comments were thorough and incredibly helpful, and it was published in the inaugural issue. I would definitely submit there again.

Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

I teach about evolution during my introductory biology and evolutionary ecology courses. I think a common misconception that people have is that evolution has a direction. That favorable mutations may arise more often when needed, that natural selection will always produce a fixed, final, and optimal form, and that species can ‘deevolve’. Evolutionary processes are much more dynamic and are not anticipatory, which makes them harder to predict but more interesting to study.

How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

Evolutionary research characterizes how the natural world operates and came to be. Moreover, our research informs and benefits many common and important aspects of society, from antibiotic resistance and crop improvement to policy decisions and providing the narratives of our favorite nature shows. The benefits of evolutionary research and of the scientific process could be made more clear and accessible if we increased our outreach and science communication efforts.

Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

In Defense of Plants is amazing, and I will be using a good deal of their content in an upcoming course.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

I have two pieces of advice. First, there is no rush to go straight to graduate school after you finish undergrad. I have many friends, myself included, that took ‘unconventional’ routes to graduate school, including traveling, working full time outside of academia, or working as a lab technician or field assistant. There isn’t a single professor out there who would see these experiences as a negative. Second, don’t hesitate to advocate for what you need to succeed both personally or professionally. I went to grad school at an R1, but loved teaching and wanted to gain experience. I took a course on teaching in higher education and then took a formal leave of absence to teach a course before returning to write my thesis and defend. There was some pushback against this at first, but it was what I needed to orient and motivate myself moving forward.

What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

I know it is tempting to start panicking about the job market the second you graduate from grad school, but my advice would be to take some time to enjoy being a postdoc for a while. In a way, you have the most freedom you will have for some time to indulge in whatever your postdoc entails... research, mentoring, writing, teaching, etc. This is the time to really figure out what you enjoy and what you want your future to be, whether it’s to continue in academia or not.

How was your first faculty meeting?

At Davidson College, all new faculty start over the summer, but faculty meetings don’t begin until the fall semester. The first college-wide faculty meeting of the academic year focuses on welcoming new faculty and staff, updating us on the college’s accomplishments in the past academic year, and briefly introducing us to the incoming cohort of students. It was more like a pep-rally than a meeting, and it left me feeling really excited about the upcoming year.

What is something most people don’t know about you?

If music is playing, I will start to vividly daydream, no matter what I’m trying to do. Sometimes that is ok, but if I need to concentrate, I have to listen to podcasts, the news, or a constant drone of background noise.

What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

I spend nearly all of my free time playing with my kids these days, which means I spend a lot of time reading books, playing make-believe, and taking walks. I also enjoy crocheting, reading sci-fi and fantasy books, and cooking.




 
 
 
 
 




 
 
 
 



 
 
 



 
 
 
 



 
 
 
 



 
 
 


 
 
 
 



 
 
 
 



 
 
  


View full page

This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

Nicholas Kooyers
Assistant Professor
Department of Biology
University of Louisiana, Lafayette
www.plantadaptation.com
www.invasiongenomics.com
Start date: August 2018

PhD: Washington University in St. Louis; Advisor: Kenneth Olsen.
Postdoc: University of Virginia; Advisor: Benjamin Blackman.
Other positions: University of California, Berkeley (Postdoctoral Researcher; Benjamin Blackman); Research Scientist (University of South Florida; No Advisor).

About the department:

Everything about UL-Lafayette is warm – the friendly people, the Cajun and Creole food, and the Gulf Coast Climate. Our Department of Biology houses an abundance of great evolutionary biologists relative to its size as the PhD that we award is in Environment and Evolutionary Biology. Our most unique feature is a functioning cypress swamp in the center of campus just steps outside the Biology building.

About the research:

My research focuses on understanding how often local adaptation occurs in nature and the genetic and physiological mechanisms that either constrain or facilitate local adaptation. I currently study these basic questions in context of examining potential responses to climate change, determining why some species become invasive, and investigating why specific trait syndromes recurrently evolve across the tree of life. I use a variety of approaches to address these questions, combining field studies, manipulative experiments and population genetic theory with modern genomics and bioinformatic tools to determine how patterns of genetic and phenotypic variation have evolved across space and time.

What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

None of the challenges that I have had on the job have come close to the difficulty of getting a tenure track position and cracking the two-body problem. However, the biggest challenge for me since starting has been to temper my own expectations for myself. We all come in absolutely gung-ho to get started and do all the things, and so it can be disappointing when you are not immediately producing the results or the papers with the efficiency that you had in your postdoc. The fact is that it takes a while to fill out the lab both in terms of equipment and people, and the skillsets required to accomplish these tasks are not that same as those as I used in graduate school and postdoctoral work. Odd questions come up; for instance, I never really thought about the electrical requirements of a molecular lab and while renovating the lab, I had to know how many electrical outlets I wanted, locations for the outlets, and voltage requirements. How many thermocyclers can I plug into one circuit? What about the plant growth chamber requirements? These are the little things that lead to decision fatigue. More broadly, I want to build a lab that will fit our current and future research needs and create an inclusive and empathic culture, and this needs to take precedence over an immediate productivity.

Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

I most certainly remember both my first rejection and my first accepted paper. They came nearly 6 years apart! What stood out both times was the quality of reviews that I received. The rejection came at the end of my graduate work. I submitted a paper examining how clines in a plant defense called cyanogenesis, or the ability to produce hydrogen cyanide after tissue damage, evolved over similar environmental gradients in geographically disparate regions where white clover was introduced. The decision was a reject with the caveat that resubmission would be considered if I added another experiment. This experiment was exactly the direction I wanted to go next, but it would have to wait because I needed to graduate. The reviews were detailed and on point - paper simply did not measure up to the impact expected in Evolution (a slightly revised manuscript was accepted at Heredity soon after). My first accepted publication in Evolution examined patterns of character displacement across an elevation gradient in two co-occurring species of monkeyflower. The review process really helped this paper. The AE, Amy Angert, posed a series of questions that helped us put some unusual results into a broader conceptual framework. In both cases, the review processes helped me as an early career scientist by pushing me outside of my current thinking and helping me to be critical of my own work. I really value the quality and collegial reviews that I have gotten at society journals (particularly Evolution, The American Naturalist, and Ecology).

How did you get interested in evolutionary biology?

I don’t have the classic story where I was interested in specific organisms or ecosystems when I was a small child or adolescent. I simply started taking all the ecology and field classes that I could during my undergraduate work at Valparaiso University because I really enjoyed being outdoors and thought environmental conservation was important. Really by luck of the draw, I got assigned to an amazing advisor, Dr. Rob Swanson, and he got me involved in molecular plant genetics and evolution. I was drawn into evolutionary biology by plant secondary compounds. Not necessarily abusing any of these compounds, but thinking about their origins and purpose. There are over 400,000 known plant secondary metabolites, but so many of the common chemical defenses have evolved multiple times in different clades in the angiosperm tree of life. For instance, cyanogenesis has evolved at least 13 separate times! Unlocking this paradox drove me to graduate school and into thinking about functional constraints to evolution and the genetic architecture of adaptation. Understanding the evolution of plant defense is still a major part of my research program and has provoked many of my thoughts on the evolution of functional trait syndromes and the genetic basis of adaptation.

Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

I think evolution outreach is absolutely essential. My main outreach focuses on citizen science and through interacting with educators at secondary schools in my local community. The citizen science work has been through the creation of a program called Walking with Wildflowers in collaboration with USA National Phenology Network and Ben Blackman. The goal of this program is to accumulate phenology data for alpine and subalpine plant species at multiple locations across their ranges by recruiting hikers along the Pacific Crest Trail. Hikers enter basic phenology data for ~20 plants per site into their smartphone. Because there are so many hikers that traverse this trail, we hope to get a complete dataset that extends across many growing seasons. This dataset would be ideal to examine which plant species are unable to shift reproductive phenology with changing climates. Check out our website: https://pct.usanpn.org/. I also have been getting involved with evolution outreach at local high schools in Louisiana. We have a number of modules that we bring into these classrooms. My favorite module was designed by Ken Olsen that I helped refine during my graduate work. This module allows students to survey local white clover populations for the cyanogenesis polymorphism, use Mendelian genetics and Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium to determine local allele frequencies, and compare their results with other classes across the world. Check it out here: https://pages.wustl.edu/cloverproject

A last piece of outreach is in the context of a large collaborative group – the Consortium for Plant Invasion Genomics (CPING). We were recently funded by NSF to use herbarium specimens and genomics to better understand the evolution of invasive species. We also have a large outreach component where we conduct genomics and bioinformatics bootcamps for researchers in EPSCoR states. Check out our website here: www.invasiongenomics.com.

What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

I have put some time into thinking about this question as I just started training my first students. My advice to a young evolutionary biologist is to invest time into understanding the theoretical and historical context of your research early in your career. Do this by committing time to reading extensively in your field – not just the papers that came out in the last decade or two, but back to Darwin, Fisher, Wright, Dobzhansky, Simpson, etc. It is amazing how insightful these early evolutionary biologists were and how often the same debates recur through time. This approach has helped me frame my research in the broadest possible context.

Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

So many mistakes…. One particular mistake that I have made over and over is failing to adequately proofread emails, manuscripts, grant proposals, etc. During my first year as a graduate student, I emailed a professor at another university that I had never met, but I was interested in collaborating with because he worked with a particularly interesting plant species. I was so enthusiastic that my email came off as informal. I got a scathing email in reply with my advisor cc’ed, and learned a lesson about how to make first contact with potential collaborators. When I applied for an NSF postdoctoral fellowship, I spelled the scientific name of my new focal species wrong in two different ways! A reviewer definitely caught it and mentioned it in their review. I must have spent hours proofreading that grant and still missed it. Finally, my first year applying for faculty positions, I managed to accidentally miss the ‘l’ in public in my cover letter for four schools. I hope the search committees got a chuckle out of it because this incident is burned into my memory. I do not think that these careless errors can ever be completely avoided, but now I read everything I write out loud and recruit more help proofreading.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 


 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 


 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 


View full page

Earlier this year, the SSE Council met in Raleigh, NC for our semi-annual meeting. We welcomed our new leaders Lynda Delph (President-Elect), Ophélie Ronce (Non-North American Vice President), Chris Caruso (Treasurer), Elizabeth Carlen (GSAC Chair-Elect), Joel McGlothlin (Councilor), and Nicole Valenzuela (Councilor). 

We reported, discussed, and voted on a variety of existing and upcoming initiatives, outlined below. We heard from each of our committees, as well as from our Business Office about our finances and membership statistics, and from our journal publisher Wiley about the progress of our journals Evolution and Evolution Letters in terms of reach, readership, and influence. We hope you’ll take a moment to look through this summary and follow the links to learn more about areas where SSE is having an impact. New programs and initiatives are marked with an asterisk.

Topics we covered at the meeting included:

  • Hosting a welcoming, inclusive, intellectually stimulating, and fun annual meeting with the American Society of Naturalists and the Society of Systematic Biologists by:
    • Presenting top research through our Sponsored Symposia
    • Providing a variety of events for attendees from all backgrounds and career stages, including a “Flying Solo” event hosted by the SSE Graduate Student Advisory Council, the return of the Story Collider event featuring diverse voices from our community, and mixers for evolutionary biologists with disabilities, *scientists of color, *women in science, LGBTQ+ members, *PUI researchers, and more
    • Increasing visibility and engagement with our Safe Evolution Code of Conduct by supporting trained Evo Allies and by *offering a workshop on improving workplace climate open to all attendees

[Note: Given the recent cancellation of the 2020 Evolution meeting, plans are now in the works for adjustments to the 2021 meeting and possible virtual events later this year.]

  • Continuing to provide a home for top evolution research in our journals Evolution and Evolution Letters by:

    • Maintaining short decision times while providing high quality, constructive reviews
    • Continuing to provide low-cost Open Access options, especially to SSE members
    • Increasing our international authorship and readership
    • Offering science writing opportunities for trainees and improving research accessibility through free-access Digests
    • Continuing to improve our article download and access rates
  • Supporting student research through our grants and awards, including:
      • Improving the application process via the online awards module for our Graduate Research Excellence Grants (GREGs) by working with our business office and web developer
      • *Providing sample proposals as examples for students without experience writing GREG proposals
      • Recognizing outstanding student presentations through the Hamilton Award
      • Recognizing top student research through the Fisher Prize
      • Celebrating first-time presenters at the annual meeting with swag provided by GSAC
    • Increasing visibility of and participation in our many education and outreach activities, including:

    • Increasing international participation in SSE and engagement with evolutionary biology through our existing International Committee programs and grants, including:

      • Funding for events organized by non-US evolution societies
      • Funding for SSE members to participate in international training workshops
      • Funding for SSE members in low-GDP countries to attend Evolution or ESEB meetings
    • Continuing to recognize and promote diverse voices in our community including:
      • *Awarding the first Inclusiveness, Diversity, Equity, and Accessibility Award with ASN and SSB to recognize outstanding contributions to increasing diversity and accessibility in the evolutionary biology community
      • Giving a voice to the evolution community’s diverse members and experiences through the SSE Community Blog, which you can submit to by contacting blog [at] evolutionsociety.org
      • Highlighting new PIs in our New Faculty Profile series
      • *Assessing our inclusivity through requests for award applicants to voluntarily provide their anonymized demographic information

    • *Expanding our ability to responsibly manage Society funds with the addition of our new Treasurer position, filled by Chris Caruso

    • Promoting a safe, inclusive environment for our community through the work of the tri-society Code of Ethics Committee

    We thank you all for the opportunity to serve you. We welcome any thoughts, inputs, and feedback you have for us. Please feel free to reach out via email (communications@evolutionsociety.org), Twitter (;@sse_evolution), or Facebook (;@SSE.evolution).


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Tory Hendry
    Assistant Professor
    Department of Microbiology
    Cornell University
    https://toryhendry.weebly.com/
    Start date: February 2018

    PhD: University of Michigan; Advisor: Paul Dunlap.
    Postdoc: University of Arizona; Advisor: David Baltrus.
    Postdoc: University of California Berkeley. Advisors: Steven Lindow and Nicholas Mills.

    About the department:

    For me, the most unique thing about Cornell is that there is a lot of interaction across biology-related departments. There are evolutionary biologists like myself scattered around various departments in addition to Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. The community here has been very interactive and it’s been great to see excitement for interdisciplinary evolutionary biology, especially in host-microbe interactions.

    About the research:

    My research program is focused on understanding how interactions with eukaryotic hosts influence bacterial evolution. I’m interested in major evolutionary changes at the genome level, like genomic reduction and the evolution of novel traits. My dissertation work was on genome evolution of luminous symbionts in fish and we’re currently working on deep-sea anglerfish symbionts. But most of the work in the lab is on bacterial evolution in insect or plant associations using a combination of experiments and -omics. I’m happy to now have a great lab group working on diverse systems, but that we stay connected with common research themes.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    The thing I probably need to work on the most is being better at switching back and forth between different kinds of tasks in short periods of time. I rarely have large chunks of time to devote to writing but I find it hard to mentally switch modes sometimes. One thing that has helped has been making priority lists to be sure I focus on what needs to be done.

    What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

    How much I like it! It seems funny to say, since it was the career I was aiming for, but what we do during much of our training (during grad school or postdocs) is so different than being a PI. It's hard to know how you will really like it until you get there I think, and a lot of what we hear about being a PI is negative, like the work load or stress. For me, this stage is really the most fun. I love the freedom of following the research directions I want in the lab and seeing all of the awesome data my lab members generate. I even like writing grant proposals, although it's been harder to keep up that excitement as my work load has increased.

    How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

    When new lab members start in the lab I create a list of mentoring expectations, including what I expect from them and also what they can expect from me. At regular meetings I try to check back in about what trainees feel like they need that they may not have been getting from me. There is only so much you can change your style I think, but as much as possible I try to adapt what I do to approaches that are the most useful for each individual.

    Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

    I'm always thinking about new lab members, but right now the focus is more on potential postdocs than grad students. For potential lab members, drive and comfort with learning independently is important to me. It's also important to me that the lab be tight knit and able to have meaningful interactions with each other. Particularly since various lab members are working on different systems, it's important that we have overlap in conceptual interests and also show a lot of care and respect for each other.

    When and why did you become a SSE member?

    I became a member for my first Evolution meeting in grad school and I chose SSE because of the strong focus on education and outreach.

    What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

    In addition to networking at Evolution, I love that my lab members have access to resources through SSE, like grad student grants or outreach grants. I really appreciate that SSE supports trainee development.

    Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

    The story that stands out is from the 2014 meeting in Raleigh that gave out laser pointers. I brought my 3 year old to this meeting and while he was playing with a gang of other kids at a poster session someone started pointing the laser on the ground around them like a cat toy. This led to several minutes of hilarity, but also shows another thing that I love about Evolution meetings, how family friendly they are.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    My first Evolution Meeting was in 2010 in Portland, Oregon. It was actually my first large conference and it was great! It made Evolution my preferred yearly meeting.

    Besides research, how do you promote science?

    My outreach activities involve expanding research opportunities for undergraduates. I co-organize an REU program, Microbial Friends and Foes REU, for host-microbe interactions, and I run a similar program for Cornell students. The goal is to provide authentic research experiences for diverse undergrads, as well as professional development skills. For Cornell students, I recently added a Wikipedia editing aspect to the program so that students can practice scientific communication and outreach. Watching students grow in these programs (and promoting them on Twitter!) has been a very rewarding experience for me.

    Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

    The main course that I teach is Biology of Infectious Disease, which focuses on concepts in evolution and ecology through a pathogen lens. A lot of pre-health or public health students take it, and the focus is a bit different from how I normally think about science. The biggest challenge for me has been impressing on them the importance of fundamental processes in evolution and ecology in the transmission and epidemiology of disease, as well as what we can learn from basic science.

    Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

    The concept that surprised my students the most last year was the virulence/transmission trade offs that some pathogens face. I think they weren't used to thinking about disease from the pathogen's point of view and it was a lot of fun to see that change of perspective.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    It took me a while to figure out that self confidence was something that I could actively develop, not just something I either had or didn't have. I encourage both grad students and postdocs to be active about this, to create lists or folders of things that they are proud of. These might be the sort of accomplishments they would put on a CV, or they might be the things that we don't share, like being proud of making it through a rough time in your life. In academia the big successes, like papers and grants, are a lot less common than the rejections. It's important to celebrate even small accomplishments and to remind yourself of what you are proud of.

    Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

    Yes! My most recent talk at the Entomological Society of America meeting had someone else's slides come up and we couldn't get it fixed, so I just talked at everyone for a while. Apparently it went ok.

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    Spending time with my family and various pets, including my flock of chickens.


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     
     
     


     

     
     
     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     
     
     


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Laura Lagomarsino
    Assistant Professor & Herbarium Director
    Biological Sciences
    Louisiana State University
    http://www.lauralago.net/
    Start date: August 2017

    PhD: Harvard University; Advisor: Charles Davis.
    Postdoc: Missouri Botanical Garden & University of Missouri- St. Louis; Advisor: Nathan Muchhala.
     

    About the department:

    I'm in a very large, broad biology department at LSU. One of our departmental strengths is in systematics and museum-based research. In addition to running my own lab, I am one of a handful of faculty curators: I am Director of the Shirley C. Tucker Herbarium, a collection of ca. 400,000 plant, fungus, and lichen specimens.

    About the research:

    Our lab's research focuses on the origin and maintenance of Neotropical plant biodiversity, especially in the tropical Andean mountains, the World’s most species-rich biodiversity hotspot. We are particularly interested in the relative importance of abiotic (e.g., mountain uplift) and biotic (e.g., hummingbird pollination) factors in explaining patterns of species diversity. Integrating across scales, we use phylogenetic studies incorporating hundreds of species to inform ecological and microevolutionary investigations at or below the species level. Natural history collections are essential to our research; we extract genomic, phenotypic, and environmental data from their specimens.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    The biggest challenge, by far, of being a new PI is balancing all of the responsibilities and expectations that I now bear. On any given day, I am a scientist; a teacher; a financial planner; a museum curator; pest management; a strong-handed boss; a compassionate mentor; a public speaker; a grant writer; an editor; a PR professional; a plant expert for my local community; and someone in search of, or able to lend, a sympathetic ear. I didn't appreciate how much time I had to sit and think as a graduate student and postdoc!

    What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

    My lab has taken on a life of its own! The "LagoLab" has its own identity, very little of which I am actually responsible for.

    How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

    It quickly became clear that I need to be a very flexible mentor in order to lead a happy, diverse, productive lab. It takes me about a semester to understand how to best work with a new lab member: are they motivated by deadlines, or do they thrive when I give them space? What skills would they most benefit from building, and what opportunities would help them meet these goals? What seems to really get them excited, and does this match what they say their passion is (nb: it often doesn't!)? Once I know the lab member well enough, I am able to provide an individualized mentoring program that helps them reach their goals, whether those are similar to my own or not.

    Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

    Even though I'm not actively recruiting at the moment, I'm always looking for motivated, excited students to join the lab! Demonstrated research experience and the ability to discuss scientific interests at a high level is important, but so is being a kind person who will fit in well with the current lab.

    When and why did you become a SSE member?

    As a graduate student, I mainly belonged to botany-oriented societies. I joined SSE as a postdoc to expand my community to include a broader base of scientists.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    Believe it or not, my first Evolution meeting was not until 2016 in Austin, TX. Even as an extroverted postdoc, I was pretty intimidated by the number of famous, familiar names in attendance—but it turns out the Evolution community is just as friendly as the Botany community! I ended up winning the Ernst Mayr Prize from the Society of Systematic Biologists that year, which I think put me on people's radars faster than would have happened otherwise.

    Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

    My first Evolution publication was "Repeated evolution of vertebrate pollination syndromes in a recently diverged Andean plant clade," the last chapter of my PhD dissertation. I was so chuffed to publish in this highly respected venue, and was very impressed with the peer review process (hats off to AE extraordinaire, Stacey Smith!). This paper was published the same week that I started my faculty position, and a colleague forwarded me the journal contents with the note, "A classy entrance!". That meant a lot.

    Besides research, how do you promote science?

    As the LSU herbarium director, an important part of my job is advocating for natural history collections. I do this in many ways: participating in outreach activities for children or for the general audience; serving on Society committees that dedicate resources to in-need herbaria; participating in working groups focused on extending the reach of collections; and, of course, publishing research that incorporates data from herbaria!

    How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

    In the middle of the COVID-19 outbreak, the importance of evolutionary research is crystal clear. Like many, I've been using https://nextstrain.org/ to track the evolution of the SARS-COV-2 virus.

    Do you have a time management tip to share?

    I have found two time management techniques that work for me. The first is the Pomodoro method: work for 25 minutes, take a 5 minute break, repeat. I often find that I only need to get a couple under my belt before I hit my own groove. I'm also part of a small accountability group with other pre-tenure women. In our twice-weekly meetings, we state our goals and allow ourselves to chat for a short time, and then spend 2 hours actually writing. Sometimes, it's the only 4 hours of writing I do in a given week!

    What is your favorite app?

    My lab would not run without Slack.

    Outside of work, I use the NY Times Crossword and iNaturalist apps frequently. I'm also learning bird calls during this COVID-19 social distancing period, and finding the Merlin Bird ID app invaluable toward this goal.

    Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

    In Defense of Plants and Ologies

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Take as much time as you can in your first year of graduate school to read the literature broadly and become familiar with the core questions and concepts of your subfield. And don't be discouraged if you don't know what your project will be or you don't know how to run so-and-so analysis; you'll get there.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

    I encourage beginning postdocs to do some soul searching about their career goals. Is an R1 faculty job really what you want, or is it what you think you are expected to want? I love my faculty job, but they can be hard to come by and it takes a type (see my answer to the first question above). There are so many other careers a PhD prepares you for, many of which are higher paying and/or less stressful: an industry job, a collections manager or curator in a natural history collection, a research coordinator at a non-profit, etc. There is no shame in actively seeking these out if you think you will find more joy in them than a faculty position. If you do want a faculty job, work on developing the "Publications" and "Research Funding" sections of your CV.

    How was your first faculty meeting?

    It was pretty uneventful. We are a huge department, so we meet in a large lecture hall and it felt more like a class than a participatory meeting.

    Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

    I hate to think back to my very first talk as an undergraduate intern in the Research Training Program at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History. I'm not sure how, but I managed to insert a car crash animation into one of my results slides some time after my last practice talk but before the real deal. I was mortified when it played unexpectedly— with sound effects!— during my Very Serious Talk to a room full of my friends and, worse yet, curators!

    What is something most people don’t know about you?

    I'm a native English speaker, but speak Spanish at home with my Costa Rican husband.

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    I love crossword puzzles, practicing plant identification in my yard or with iNaturalist, and long walks under Louisiana's dramatic evening skies with my yellow lab, Rocoto– maybe while sipping a local craft beer.

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     


     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     

     
     


     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     


     

     
     
     
     

     
     
     


     
     
     


     
     


     
     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     


    View full page

    View full page

    Submit a Nomination

    We welcome nominations and self-nominations of papers published in Evolution in the last two years. We wish to highlight a diversity of authors and study systems.

    Submit nomination button


    View full page

    Each month, the Evolution Highlights series will highlight some of the interesting and varied papers published within the last few years in Evolution. The goal of these Evolution Highlights is to let our readers learn more about how the highlighted study came into existence, and to invite the authors to share stories and tips from the perspective of a recently published author. We welcome nominations and self-nominations for the Evolution Highlights. Find out how to submit a paper here.

    How mountains shape biodiversity: The role of the Andes in biogeography, diversification, and reproductive biology in South America’s most species-rich lizard radiation (Squamata: Liolaemidae)
    Damien Esquerré, Ian G. Brennan, Renee A. Catullo, Fernando Torres‐Pérez, & J. Scott Keogh

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/evo.13657

    Abstract:
    Testing hypotheses on drivers of clade evolution and trait diversification provides insight into many aspects of evolutionary biology. Often, studies investigate only intrinsic biological properties of organisms as the causes of diversity, however, extrinsic properties of a clade’s environment, particularly geological history, may also offer compelling explanations. The Andes are a young mountain chain known to have shaped many aspects of climate and diversity of South America. The Liolaemidae are a radiation of South American reptiles with over 300 species found across most biomes and with similar numbers of egg-laying and livebearing species. Using the most complete dated phylogeny of the family, we tested the role of Andean uplift in biogeography, diversification patterns, and parity mode of the Liolaemidae. We find that the Andes promoted lineage diversification and acted as a species pump into surrounding biomes. We also find strong support for the role of Andean uplift in boosting the species diversity of these lizards via allopatric fragmentation. Finally, we find repeated shifts in parity mode associated with changing thermal niches, with live-bearing favored in cold climates and egg-laying favored in warm climates. Importantly, we find evidence for possible reversals to oviparity, an evolutionary transition believed to be extremely rare.

    Evolution Highlight by Damien Esquerré
    Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University

    What gave you the idea for this study?

    My career as a scientist was kickstarted with Liolaemus lizards, back when I was an undergrad student in Santiago, Chile. I did quite a bit of taxonomy on them, and by doing fieldwork I quickly realised how you would find especially big diversity in the Andes mountains. For me it was obvious how important these mountains were at determining so much about their diversity and biology. The idea is not new of course, and others have investigated this, but I wanted to do it at large scale, make a big phylogeny of the group and test several hypothesis on the effect of these mountains and their uplift.

    What was the big question you were trying to ask and why was it exciting?

    The big broad question was, how has the formation of the Andes shaped the evolutionary fate of the Liolaemus lizards? This was exciting on many levels, but in particular was my personal attachment to these lizards and also to the Andes, where I grew up.

    In what ways does this study expand or build on your previous studies?

    It expands on providing a more mechanistic explanation on the patterns I was studying previously, which was the diversity of lizards in the Andes.

    From your perspective, what was the most interesting or intriguing aspect of this study?

    I think the finding that there might be reversals to oviparity, breaking Dollo's law. I am not saying that definitely happened, but phylogenetic evidence suggests it is likely. I have future research plans to delve deeper into this question, taking a more physiological and histological approach, collaborating with people who have these skills which I don't.

    Were there any unexpected logistical or technical challenges you had to address?

    Data analysis always presents difficult challenges, and that's why I like collaborating with people who can help with that. In that respect, Ian Brennan and Renee Catullo were extremely good to have on the team.

    Did your work take you to any interesting locations? If so, what were they like?

    Most of the actual work, like usual, took place in the lab and in front of a computer, but before that I did spend a lot of time doing field work in different locations of the Chilean Andes. It is really cool to be in these places where vegetation barely grows, you get altitude sickness, that are covered in meters of snow during winter, and yet in the summer they are crawling with lizards. The landscapes are just mind-blowing.

    Tell us something about collecting these data that people might not know or think about.

    Collecting some of these lizards was a real physical challenge, since you actually have to climb mountains to get them. In other cases the roads that lead to some of the locations are quite narrow and scary, and I have feared falling off cliffs in the vehicle a few times.

    Did you have to learn any new analytical techniques for this study?

    Oh yes, lots of them. Maybe even everything I did in the study I had to learn.

    What was the most challenging part of analyzing your data?

    I guess running big time-callibrated trees in a Bayesian framework that take weeks and finding the appropriate priors for these is always a bit of a head-ache!

    What was your writing process like?

    I think it was pretty straightforward, with lots of discussion with my supervisor Scott Keogh and my other co-authors on how to best approach writing together such a variety of different analytical approaches and making it coherent.

    What was the biggest challenge about writing the manuscript?

    Making very different aspects (phylogeny, diversification, reproductive mode reconstruction) come together into a coherent manuscript.

    How did writing up this study compare to previous paper writing experiences?

    It was quite fun, I had already written a few papers and had felt like already been through that insecurity about writing and was actually enjoying it, especially because it is a topic I love.

    What was the review / revision process like?

    You always have Reviewer 2! But kidding aside, the editor and reviewers were very good and constructive and I am really happy with the final product this process produced.

    Do you have any writing tips for others?

    I like reading and writing simultaneously. I start reading a paper I like and that inspires me and I write little parts and start putting it all together. Might not be the best way, but works for me!

    Looking back, what is one thing you learned from doing this study (other than your main findings) that you’ll use in future projects?

    How to set up a good team of researchers with different skills and perspective to increase the quality of a project.

    What was the most difficult part of this study and / or the most rewarding?

    The analysis for me is usually the biggest challenge, since I do not have a computing background. The most rewarding was seeing how much media attention this study got and get to tell about our research to a general public. We even got a poet inspired to write a poem about the study! I like when science leaves the bubble of academia and gets a non-scientific audience excited about stuff they did not know.

    How would you explain your study to a five-year-old?

    Mountains are very old, but have not always been there. They grow kind of like trees do -- so slow we can't see it during our lives. Thankfully, smart scientists have figured out how old they are. Animals have also been around for very long and have also been changing, through a process called evolution. We found that as mountains have been growing, a particular group of lizards that likes living on them has been changing along with them and thanks to them.


    Damien Esquerré
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     


    View full page

    Each month, the Evolution Highlights series will highlight some of the interesting and varied papers published within the last few years in Evolution. The goal of these Evolution Highlights is to let our readers learn more about how the highlighted study came into existence, and to invite the authors to share stories and tips from the perspective of a recently published author. We welcome nominations and self-nominations for the Evolution Highlights. Find out how to submit a paper here.


    Differential introgression of a female competitive trait in a hybrid zone between role-reversed species
    Sara E. Lipshutz, Joana I. Meier, Graham E. Derryberry, Matthew J. Miller, Ole Seehausen, Elizabeth P. Derryberry

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/evo.13675

    Abstract:
    Mating behavior between recently diverged species in secondary contact can impede or promote reproductive isolation. Traditionally, researchers focus on the importance of female mate choice and male–male competition in maintaining or eroding species barriers. Although female–female competition is widespread, little is known about its role in the speciation process. Here, we investigate a case of interspecific female competition and its influence on patterns of phenotypic and genetic introgression between species. We examine a hybrid zone between sex‐role reversed, Neotropical shorebird species, the northern jacana (Jacana spinosa) and wattled jacana (J. jacana), in which female–female competition is a major determinant of reproductive success. Previous work found that females of the more aggressive and larger species, J. spinosa, disproportionately mother hybrid offspring, potentially by monopolizing breeding territories in sympatry with J. jacana. We find a cline shift of female body mass relative to the genetic center of the hybrid zone, consistent with asymmetric introgression of this competitive trait. We suggest that divergence in sexual characteristics between sex‐role reversed females can influence patterns of gene flow upon secondary contact, similar to males in systems with more typical sex roles.

    Evolution Highlight by Sara Lipshutz
    Biology - Ecology, Evolution, Behavior, Indiana University

    What gave you the idea for this study?

    I’ve been fascinated by jacanas since I learned about their mating system as an undergraduate – they were on the cover of my Animal Behavior textbook. Most jacana species are sex-role reversed, meaning that in comparison to males, sexual selection is stronger on females to compete over mating opportunities. Females are polyandrous and mate with multiple males who conduct all parental care. When I learned from my coauthor Matt Miller that two Neotropical species, Northern jacanas and wattled jacanas, interbreed in Panama, I wondered how interspecific female competition might influence patterns of hybridization.

    In what ways does this study expand or build on your previous studies?

    We had previously characterized the jacana hybrid zone based on mtDNA and two nuclear loci, as well as plumage and facial ornamentation (Miller et al. 2014, BMC Evolutionary Biology). We found that phenotypic hybrids had northern jacana mtDNA more often than expected, suggesting that northern jacana females disproportionately mother hybrid offspring. We assessed potential differences in competitive traits of the two species and found that female northern jacanas had larger body mass, longer wing spurs, and were more aggressive in response to a simulated territorial intrusion than wattled jacana females (Lipshutz 2017, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology). This study in Evolution expands on past work by using thousands of genome-wide loci to estimate the center and width of the jacana hybrid zone, as well as examining clinal transitions in competitive traits – wing spur length and body mass. The reproductive success of female jacanas depends on their ability to defend and maintain breeding territories, so we predicted that divergence in competitive traits between the species could influence introgression patterns.

    From your perspective, what was the most interesting or intriguing aspect of this study?

    By characterizing patterns of genetic and phenotypic introgression between northern and wattled jacanas, we found that the transition in female body mass is displaced relative to the genetic transition between the species. This is consistent with asymmetric introgression of this competitive trait, from the larger northern jacana into the smaller wattled jacana across the hybrid zone. These patterns align with findings from other hybrid zones in which male-male competition explains asymmetric introgression from the more dominant species into the less dominant species. Whereas previous work on sexual selection and speciation predicts that females are the gatekeepers of species barriers, we find that divergence in sexual characteristics between sex-role reversed females can influence patterns of gene flow upon secondary contact, similar to males in systems with more typical sex roles.

    Were there any unexpected logistical or technical challenges you had to address?

    Catching jacanas with mist nets is challenging, given that they live on top of floating vegetation or in flooded areas. We got creative with our strategies, relying on kayaks and the generosity of Panamanian farmers, who sometimes gave us tractor or horse rides on their land. This work was made possible by several amazing field teams, consisting of colleagues from the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, students from the University of Panama and Tulane University, and assistants from the United States and the United Kingdom (see photo of field assistants).

    Did your work take you to any interesting locations? If so, what were they like?

    We sampled parental population of both species outside the hybrid zone as well as heavily in the hybrid zone, so we traveled from Palo Verde, Costa Rica to east of the Panama Canal. Some field sites had deep water with crocodiles, others were cattle, pig, or rice farms, and others were wetlands with thick mud (see boot rescue in bottom right photo of field assistants).

    Tell us something about collecting these data that people might not know or think about.

    There’s sometimes an expectation that research with wild animals is being done in pristine habitats, but the majority of localities where we study jacanas are agricultural landscapes.

    Do you have any writing tips for others?

    This study was meant to be my first chapter, but it took all of my PhD to complete. My advice for others is something I learned as a graduate student in New Orleans during Mardi Gras: it’s a marathon, not a sprint. It’s important to have structured goals for each stage of data collection, from fieldwork to lab work to analysis and writing, and it’s also important to build in more time than you think you’ll need. Weekly writing workshops in the Derryberry Lab helped me stay on track, and I received invaluable feedback from my mentors and peers at lab meetings, conferences, and visiting seminars. Presenting my work informally and formally helps me improve how I contextualize my results and their implications, all of which clarify my writing. Be kind to yourself, be patient with your progress, and seek feedback from others.

    Was this study collaborative with other groups? If so, what was valuable about that experience?

    I’ve been really fortunate to collaborate with my coauthors, who have been my mentors at various stages before and during my doctoral dissertation (see photo, right). Matt Miller hired me as an intern at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama when I was fresh out of undergrad. My PhD advisor Elizabeth Derryberry put a lot of trust in me to pursue this system and supported me at every stage. Ole Seehausen generously hosted me as an NSF GROW fellow in Switzerland, where Joana Meier helped me improve my understanding of population genomic analyses. I also benefited immensely from working with Graham Derryberry, who wrote the R package HZAR, to fit molecular and morphological data from the hybrid zone to cline models.

    Looking back, what is one thing you learned from doing this study (other than your main findings) that you’ll use in future projects?

    I love combining muddy boots fieldwork with molecular techniques, and I’m excited to continue integrating these two approaches in my ongoing work on this system.


    Sara Lipshutz
     


    Top: Northern Jacana (Jacana spinosa). Note yellow, tri-lobate frontal shield and chestnut-brown plumage.
    Bottom left: Northern x Wattled Jacana hybrid. Note yellow frontal shield with reduced wattles.
    Bottom right: Wattled Jacana (Jacana jacana). Note red, bi-lobate frontal shield, red hanging wattles, and black plumage.

     
      
     

    Field assistants
     
     
     
      

     
     
      

     

     
     
     
     
     

     


    Top row from left: Sara Lipshutz, Joana I. Meier, and Graham E. Derryberry
    Bottom row from left: Matthew J. Miller, Ole Seehausen, and Elizabeth P. Derryberry
     
     
     
      

     

     
     
     
     
     


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Clare Scott Chialvo
    Assistant Professor
    Biology Department
    Appalachian State University

    Website: https://sites.google.com/appstate.edu/scott-chialvo-lab
    Twitter handle: ScottChialvoLab
    Start date: August 2019


    PhD: University of Florida; Advisor: Marc Branham.
    Postdoc: University of Alabama; Advisor: Laura Reed.
    Postdoc: Purdue University; Advisor: Jennifer Zaspel.

    About the department:

    The Biology department at Appalachian State University is located in the southern Appalachians, an area of high biodiversity. Between our location and the biological preserve located on campus, I can easily collect the flies that I’m working with in between classes. With its strong focus on authentic research experiences for undergraduates, I have many opportunities to work with talented undergraduates.

    About the research:

    My research is focused on the evolution of novel biochemical adaptations and their impact on the biodiversity of organisms. In many cases, not much is known about these traits beyond what species possess them. I use a wide range of approaches to characterize the physiological mechanisms that generate these adaptations (e.g., selection experiments, feeding assays, a variety of ‘-omics’ methodologies) and examine their evolution in a phylogenetic context. I’m currently examining this question in mushroom-feeding Drosophila that can develop in toxic Amanita mushrooms in addition to edible mushroom species.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    Realizing that as a PI, you're basically a small business owner. You have to make sure you have the necessary equipment and consumables to run your research program. Often this involves getting competing quotes to get the best deal and get the most out of your startup, but you also have to decide how much your time is worth. Once your lab is equipped you need to make sure the people in your lab are happy and that they feel confident in what they're doing. We really don't get much training in this as a graduate student or postdoc.

    How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

    My goal as a mentor is to ensure that my lab members feel confident conducting the experiments associated with their projects. With this in mind, the first semester is usually focused on teaching them the set of techniques they'll need to complete their project and also providing opportunities for them to test these skills in a low-stakes setting. Once my lab members have been trained, I try to let them work as independently as possible.

    Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

    At Appalachian, we have an active undergraduate research program along with a Master's program. I've been lucky to recruit four talented undergraduates in my first semester. My process has been a combination of recommendations from other faculty, observing the students in a class setting, and having students come to me. With students who are interested in possibly doing research in my lab, I meet with them one on one to discuss the types of questions we work on in the lab and the associated chores of maintaining fly colonies. I think it's very important for the students to find the questions exciting since there are a lot of repetitive tasks associated with research (e.g., picking very small fly larvae). I'm currently looking for my first Master's student.

    What does becoming an SSE member mean to you or your career?

    Being a member of SSE allows me to present my research in a diverse venue and keep up with what's cutting edge in evolution.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    The first Evolution Meeting I attended was in Raleigh, NC in 2014. It was my first time presenting at a meeting outside of the annual Entomological Society of America conference. I also had my first opportunity to meet with my postdoctoral advisor at University of Alabama (Laura Reed) and her lab members.

    Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

    I do remember since it happened this past fall. I submitted a manuscript from my postdoc examining genetic variation for toxin tolerance in a population of flies that feed on mushrooms and fruit. The manuscript was rejected but without prejudice. The reviewers suggested an additional experiment and some extra analyses that will strengthen the manuscript. I'm currently working on these revisions, and I'm hoping to resubmit this spring (barring a lab shutdown due to COVID19).

    Besides research, how do you promote science?

    I really enjoy participating in outreach targeted to local K-12 schools. This past fall I got to be a part of the Skype a Scientist program. I'm hoping that this year I'll be able to start working with local teachers in Boone to design hands-on activities related to evolutionary biology.

    Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

    I'm going to be teaching our Introductory to Evolutionary Biology course. From my previous experience teaching evolution, I find that Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium, phylogenetics, and speciation seem to tie in terms of difficulty for the students. With HWE, a lot of students seem to shut down when they see the math involved. I've found that if you start by pointing out the ridiculous nature of the assumptions, it's much easier to hold their attention when you get to the math. The difficulty of phylogenies comes from the various formats that they're presented in and understanding the relationships among the species. With speciation, the confusion seems to stem from the fact that many of the students have been primarily exposed to the biological species concept. It's a bit of a shock when they learn there are over 30 concepts and growing.

    Do you have a time management tip to share?

    Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. It's very easy to say yes to every opportunity that's presented to you as a new PI. Often it seems that this might be the only chance. But it's much better for your sanity to say no to some things so that you don't end up stretched too thin.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Make sure the question that's the focus of your project is something you're passionate about now or you can be passionate about. Otherwise it can be difficult to keep working on it when you're faced with tedious or repetitive tasks like picking several hundred fly larvae or dissecting insect genitalia.

    Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

    At the Evolution meeting in Providence (2019), the fire alarm system started malfunctioning during my session. It was fixed by the time I was scheduled to talk, but then my powerpoint wouldn't load. I was just about to give my talk with no visuals when someone in the audience suggested one more possible solution, and it worked. I think it's the only time I haven't been nervous during a talk.

    What is something most people don’t know about you?

    That I got to live in Scotland while my dad was on sabbatical. Because we were there when Mad Cow disease was spreading, I can't donate blood.

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    I really love knitting. So if you see me wearing something knitted, odds are very good that I made it. One of the perks of taking the position at Appalachian is that we get enough snowy days that I have an excuse to knit more.

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     


     
     


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Michael Landis
    Assistant Professor
    Department of Biology
    Washington University in St. Louis

    Website: landislab.org
    Twitter handle: landismj
    Start date: July 2019


    PhD: UC Berkeley; Advisor: John Huelsenbeck.
    Postdoc: Iowa State University; Advisor: Tracy Heath.
    Postdoc: Yale University; Advisor: Michael Donoghue.

    About the department:

    I’m a new assistant professor in the Department of Biology at Washington University in St. Louis. Not only do I really love my department and university, but St. Louis as a whole is home to a diverse cast of biodiversity researchers, which makes the city a wonderful place to be.

    About the research:

    I study how evolutionary processes shape biodiversity over deep timescales. I’m particularly interested in biological and statistical problems related to phylogenetics, historical biogeography, and the evolution of ecological interactions. Some questions that have really seized my attention include: What can biogeography and paleogeography tell us about phylogenetic divergence times? How do lineages move and evolve among habitats that move and evolve? and How do ecological networks among hosts and parasites evolve? Most of my work involves designing statistical models of evolution, developing computational inference methods, and learning about evolution through simulated and biological datasets.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    I don’t think there’s been one challenge that stands out above the rest. But what I've found challenging is the sheer number and variety of challenges you face when starting as a PI. When getting started, there seems to be a new challenge every day designing courses, writing grants, hiring, mentoring, admin stuff — so you're constantly learning on the fly, making little mistakes, adjusting goals, and so on. In a way, it reminds me of being new to grad school.

    What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

    How many decisions you have to make. Time is finite and information is normally incomplete, so you even have to decide what decisions are worth fretting over! This feels different from, say, my PhD, when I most often faced the question, "Can I do it?", while now I'm mostly asking myself, "Should I do it?"

    How have you prepared to be a PI?

    I solicited advice from friends and mentors to learn what worked for them and what didn't. Most are very willing to share their thoughts and time, I’ve found. You just have to ask. Pooling diverse perspectives helps, since institutions and situations and individuals vary so widely. I also found that my postdoctoral training felt too objective-oriented at times, which left me somewhat distanced from the joy of learning. So, I set aside time for recreational learning, on topics like botany and Earth history, which was really rejuvenating.

    When and why did you become an SSE member?

    I joined SSE as a postdoc in 2017 at a time when I was realizing how important it is to support the institutions you appreciate.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    Norman, OK in 2011 was not only the first time I went to an Evolution Meeting, but it was my first conference experience of any kind. My undergraduate degree is in computer science, and I am a latecomer to biology and biological research. Attending exposed me to all sorts of new biological curiosities and scientific approaches. As a new researcher, it also surprised me to learn that the authors of papers that you knew by heart attended the conference and are totally approachable.

    Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

    Yes, of course! I submitted my first paper to Evolution in 2017 with Will Freyman and Bruce Baldwin. In it, we demonstrated how one can use island ages to estimate the timing and location of lineage splitting events that gave rise to the silversword alliance, an adaptive radiation of plants that's endemic to the Hawaiian High Islands. Problems like this are difficult because we don’t know exactly how any two lineages are related, when or where any two lineages diverged, when lineages dispersed among islands, or exactly how old any of the islands are. All of those unknowns are random variables in the system that must be inferred (or at least accounted for). Our approach was to design an evolutionary model that combined insights from phylogenetics, biogeography, paleogeography, an integrative approach that we thought was perfect for Evolution. Hoping to submit more soon.

    Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

    When I was in grad school, I volunteered with other students to teach evolution in public high schools. This was soon after the Neandertal genome was first published, and so a few of us co-taught a module on the use of ancient DNA for puzzling together human ancestry. It’s extraordinarily fascinating research on everyone's favorite model organism. But teaching high schoolers about genetic differences among human populations is very challenging. How human evolution is communicated can inspire and enlighten people, but it can also hurt people if accidentally mishandled. It has to be done with a tremendous amount of care and sensitivity.

    Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

    Stuff from historical biogeography that makes you appreciate how much the world has changed over deep time, like India inching all the way from Gondwana to collide with Asia, or Eocene palm trees surviving in the Arctic. Then you tell them about vegetational rafts.

    How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

    With how the coronavirus has swept across the globe, it's hard to ignore the explanatory power of evolution. All of us are looking towards medical professionals and scientists to understand what’s happening and why it's happening. Where the virus originated, how it spread across regions, how communicable it is, how it's mutating, and how many will be infected are all being understood through explicit or implicit evolutionary thinking. What if we knew none of these things? I get chills. But what do we see? Phylogenetic trees for the virus are showing up in news and social media, thanks to monitoring tools like NextStrain. I see this as evidence that the light of evolution is making sense of an otherwise senseless disaster, and not just for experts, but for everyone.

    Do you have a time management tip to share?

    Don't give away your most valuable hours of time! Why spend your most productive time writing emails instead of papers or code? I work best in the early morning, so I postpone all non-urgent work until the afternoon, when I'm a bit duller. This all might sound obvious, but it’s not always easy to identify what times of day are best to pursue different types of work. Track how long you spend on various tasks, and what you’ve produced with that time. You’ll quickly spot undesirable patterns, even after just a few days.

    What is your favorite app?

    Oblique Strategies

    Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

    A few come to mind: In Our Time, The Taproot, In Defense of Plants, Crime Pays but Botany Doesn't (YouTube)

    What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

    Not surprising, but On the Origin of Species!

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Read broadly and deeply, and trust in your initial reactions. Don't feel rushed the first 2-3 years. Just absorb. Keep watch for topics that you find fascinating, but don’t make sense to you, even after a careful reading. Often it’s the case that your confusion is shared with others, and that the field is still struggling to explain the phenomenon or mechanism. These areas are perfect for doctoral research, especially the old and “solved” problems.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

    Earnestly apply for at least one job during your first year, if you want to continue into a permanent research position. Send your application to your mentors for review. It will ensure you're ready to apply to jobs without disrupting your research when your dream job appears next year.

    Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

    So many mistakes. Most of my work is computational, so mistakes mostly cost time, but they can be very instructive. One of my favorite mistakes happened when I was first learning about phylogenetics in John Huelsenbeck’s lab. Early on, he mentioned that most phylogenetic models assume all nucleotides evolve independently of one another, and while the assumption isn’t very realistic for protein-coding genes, it’s computationally useful. Why would that be! To get a concrete sense of the problem, I wrote a little C++ program to build a rate matrix for all nucleotide sequences of length L. So, I ran the program with the modest length of L=100, my computer froze, and in that instant I understood what John meant. I felt like a character in a zen kōan.

    What is something most people don’t know about you?

    I’ve never gone fossil hunting, but I really want to!

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    These days I'm back to the simple pleasures. Cooking, reading, biking, hiking. Laughing deliriously with my wife and two little kids.


    View full page

    June 2, 2020

    Dear SSE Community,

    I am writing to you from my home just 10 km from the site in Minneapolis where police killed George Floyd, the latest in a long series of atrocities against Black Americans. This and other tragic events are set against a backdrop of anxiety, fear, and grief owing to the global Covid-19 pandemic, which has disproportionately affected Black peopleIndigenous peopleLatinx people, and others in already marginalized groups. The Society for the Study of Evolution mourns these losses and condemns racism, harassment, and discrimination in any form.

    To our members in the Black community, we extend our heartfelt sympathy and abiding support at this especially difficult time. To this community, and to all biologists of color: we hear you, and we see you. We will listen to and amplify your voices. We are striving to learn how to do better, and we will continue to work toward inclusion and equity in all of our activities. 

    SSE’s mission is to promote the study of evolutionary biology. The scientific core of evolutionary biology is valuing and appreciating biological diversity. Likewise, we welcome, support, and celebrate the diversity of our members. Like many fields of science, the field of evolutionary biology has lacked diversity, with Black people and people of African descent being particularly underrepresented (Graves 2019). Centuries of inequity and racism, suffered severely by Black communities, have resulted in barriers to participation in STEM that we must all work to break down. We promote equity, inclusion, accessibility, and diversity at all levels, and we encourage participation by individuals of all identities. 

    We also acknowledge that concepts central to evolutionary biology, especially heredity and natural selection, have historically been misused to justify egregious manifestations of racism, and that even today, co-options of evolutionary biology are being used to support racist ideologies. As evolutionary biologists, we must confront this disinformation.

    We encourage the SSE community to recognize, amplify, and celebrate the contributions that Black scientists have made, and continue to make, to the field of biology despite myriad barriers. This week, we have an excellent opportunity to do this. A group of Black biologists, collected under ;@BlackAFInStem on Twitter, started the Black Birders Week initiative, which is highlighting Black birders and naturalists. We wholeheartedly support these efforts and encourage you to follow the conversations and contributors this week on TwitterFacebook, and Instagram at #BlackBirdersWeek and #BlackInNature, and to be on the lookout for similar future initiatives.

    In the wake of last week’s painful events, I encourage all of us to examine acutely how privilege manifests in our daily lives and our work, to take steps to mitigate the resulting harm, to examine our own tendencies to stereotype, to call out racist or exclusionary statements, and to consider ways to act and provide support

    In solidarity,



    Ruth Shaw
    President, Society for the Study of Evolution


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Rebecca Tarvin smiling at the cameraRebecca Tarvin
    Assistant Professor & Assistant Curator
    Department of Integrative Biology & Museum of Vertebrate Zoology
    University of California, Berkeley
    www.tarvinlab.org
    Twitter: @frogsicles
    Start date: July 2019

    PhD: University of Texas at Austin; Advisor: David Cannatella & Harold Zakon.
    Postdoc: University of Texas at Austin; Advisor: David Cannatella. Miller Fellow, Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science.
     
     

    About the department:

    The Integrative Biology Department at UCB houses a dynamic group of biologists and museums, encompassing pieces of what used to be Zoology, Botany, Physiology- Anatomy, Paleontology, and Genetics departments (until 1989). Aside from being an Assistant Professor in IB, I am an Assistant Curator at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, which is an inspirational and warm environment for pursuing evolutionary biology, field research, and working with non-model systems. We have a shared molecular lab, which I love!

    About the research:

    Research in my lab integrates studies of natural history with genomics and phylogenetics. Specifically, our research aims to elucidate causal genetic mechanisms underlying novel traits, to characterize phenotypic diversification at macro and micro-evolutionary scales, and to identify factors that promote and constrain biodiversity. Projects tend to focus on the evolution of chemical defenses; current systems include poison frogs, toads, salamanders, flies, and snakes. Although most of our work is directed at non-model systems in the Bay Area and South America, we are working to get an experimental evolution model with Drosophila up and running in the lab.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    In graduate school I had three major burn-outs from over-working myself, so I've been careful to try to balance the time I spend working with my personal life. This means that I need to heavily prioritize my day-to-day tasks, which can be challenging when everything seems important. I think for me it's been most difficult to reconcile that some things that aren't that important to me are important to other people, and to accept that I can't please everyone all the time.

    What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

    I was surprised to realize how much I love mentoring (even more than I thought I already did). It's a true reward to work with such talented students and to see them grow in skills and confidence over time.

    Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

    Yes! I'm actually still working on a paper that was rejected by Evolution in 2016, which was pretty disheartening at the time. Looking back, it was not ready to be published, and the reviews I received played an important part in how I'm revising the analyses now.

    How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

    Part of why I got into research was because I'm a very curious person. I love that evolution has the answers to a lot of our "why" questions, and for that reason find this job not only intellectually satisfying but also personally satisfying. Thus, I think that anyone who wants to know more about the world around them can benefit from evolutionary research simply because it fulfills these curiosities. Case in point: "Does it Fart?" was a NYT best seller.

    Do you have a time management tip to share?

    A colleague of mine said that she spends the first two hours every day on her own research. I've adopted this practice and found that it helps me maintain research (rather than email or other things) as a priority. I block out these time-slots from meetings or any other tasks. It has made a huge difference in how I spend my time day to day. Previously, it was easy to spend an hour or two on email in the mornings before tending to anything else. I have also tried to schedule intensive tasks (like research and reading) for my more productive morning hours while scheduling more time-filling tasks (like meetings or paperwork) in the afternoons.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Read widely. Then, as you begin research try to maintain several projects at different stages so you can be gathering data for one, analyzing another, and writing up the third. Whatever you do, do not wait until your fourth or fifth year to begin writing. In general, do what works for you; don't feel so pressured to adhere to what people tell you to do. There is no one pathway to success. Ask for and listen to people's advice, but be most willing to follow the advice from those who you want to emulate rather than those who seem successful but are not people you want to be. In any case, don't underestimate your own intuition and opinions -- it's ok to be different.

    How was your first faculty meeting?

    The first faculty meeting I attended had a controversial topic on the agenda. Afterwards, several colleagues came up to me to apologize for the controversial discussion. I thought it was kind of funny because I hadn't seen the meeting as overly controversial. Since then, I've been impressed with how members of our faculty speak their minds and don't shy away from broaching difficult topics.

    What is something most people don’t know about you?

    With my herpetology background, I've long shied away from birding, but now I'm VERY into back-yard birding and I keep a house list. I get very excited when I can snap a photo of a new bird, add it to iNaturalist, and then I'll allow myself to add it to the official house list. I'm up to 17!

    small frog sitting on a leaf 
     

     
     

     
     
     
     
     
    small frog sitting on a leaf

     

     
     

     
     
     
     
     
    small frog sitting on a leaf

     

     
     

     
     
     
     
     Rebecca Tarvin smiling and holding up a very small frog


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Jesse Weber smiling at the cameraJesse N. Weber
    Assistant Professor
    Department of Integrative Biology
    University of Wisconsin-Madison
    adaptationmatters.wixsite.com/home
    Twitter: ;@EvolEmpiricist
    Start date: August 2020

    PhD: Harvard University; Advisor: Hopi Hoekstra.
    Postdoc: University of Texas at Austin; Advisor: Daniel Bolnick. Postdoc: University of Montana, Doug Emlen.
    Previous faculty position: Assistant Professor, Biological Sciences, University of Alaska Anchorage
     

     

     

    About the department:

    iBio is a large and diverse department offering undergraduate, masters and doctoral programs. As the title suggests, our faculty’s research interests are highly integrative, ranging from molecules to organisms to ecosystems, with a healthy dose of evolution. We also serve a large group of undergraduates and are responsible for teaching many of the introductory biology courses on campus.

    About the research:

    Conflicts of interest between hosts and parasites often drive rapid and elaborate forms of evolution. My lab uses genetic approaches to better understand how and why vertebrates coevolve with their macroparasites. We focus on a small fish—the threespine stickleback—and a tapeworm that must infect this fish at some point in its lifecycle. Our main questions include: How do fish evolve to resist or tolerate tapeworms? How do tapeworms evolve to evade or manipulate fish immune systems? And what factors cause parasite infection patterns to vary across space and time?

    What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

    The never-ending necessity of a resilient attitude. After spending a number of years on the job market, two years ago I was fortunate to start as an Assistant Professor at the University of Alaska Anchorage. Finally, I expected to find some stability. Then the University got hammered with a debilitating 40% budget cut in 2019. I honestly came close to throwing in the towel. I’m sure many folks are feeling the same way with this pandemic. But after many conversations with friends and some deep soul searching, I put in a few applications to my “dream jobs” and landed one of them. We are all in this career because we love it, and we have to stick with it, through thick and thin.

    Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

    I remember having a ticket to the closing ceremony in the 2007 meetings “forced” on me by my advisor—Hopi. I’m not a huge fan of ceremony, and it took some cajoling before I accepted the ticket. I'm very glad that I did, as three great things happened that night. 1) I sat at a table next to three great people that have since become close friends, 2) I was awarded the first Hamilton Prize, and 3) the person that handed me the prize—Doug—ended up becoming one of my postdoc mentors.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    My first meeting was actually in Alaska! Not only did I get to see talks by some of my scientific idols and get to enjoy an amazing salmon bake. But my lab mates and I also arranged to do some camping near Denali National Park after the meeting was over. After that visit I always knew that I would be coming back to Alaska in some form or other. Now, I look forward to catching stickleback there every summer for the foreseeable future.

    Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

    I have primarily taught genetics, but with a strong evolutionary bent. One of the hardest concepts is probability. I think the trouble comes from the transition between thinking about classical/Mendelian perspectives and more common, polygenic traits. But the students seem more comfortable after we acknowledge the gaps in our knowledge, and that we are constantly striving to not just put a number/probability on an event, but to uncover the molecular dynamics that drive the variability.

    Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

    I adore Dynamic Ecology. Such an amazing group of writers and captivating topics. I'm also a big fan of Shane Campbell-Stanton's podcast: The Biology of Superheroes.

    Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

    My first big talk was a "lightning" session at a Gordon Conference. The session organizer collected my 2 slides and promised to check them out to make sure they worked on the computer system. When I get up to present--NO PICTURES. They apologized profusely and everything went off OK, but always (triple) check your own slides!

    A fish lying on its side next to two tapeworms
    The tapeworms can weigh as much as the host, and the only fish this parasite infects are threespine stickleback, suggesting there is strong reciprocal selection in this system.
     
     
     
     
     
     
    a shallow round dish containing many tapeworms
    We love being able to sample large numbers of parasites from many environments because it really helps us to measure population genetic parameters.
     
     
      
     
     
    Jesse Weber standing knee-deep in a stream next to sampling equipment
    Some of the best things about stickleback research are the field sites. This picture was taken in a remote part of Vancouver Island.


    View full page

    Background

    SSE is aware that historical and modern-day cultural biases and lack of diversity in an applicant pool may lead to biases in the allocation of grants, prizes, and awards. Beginning with the 2020 Graduate Research Excellence Grant competitions, SSE requested voluntary demographic information from award applicants in an effort to address bias and promote equity in awarding across multiple axes of diversity.

    Answering demographic questions was voluntary—each question was required but included a “Prefer not to say” option. Answers to the demographic questions were not available to the evaluation committee during the first step of the evaluation process—the scoring and ranking of application materials (described here). The demographic data were used to assess the diversity of the applicant pool and the differences between the composition of the applicant pool and the recipient population. 

    We do not yet have demographic data on our membership, and so were unable to assess differences between the diversity of the applicant pool or recipient population and our total membership during this round of awards. The SSE Diversity Committee is discussing gathering demographic data on the membership as well as efforts to increase award proposals from underrepresented groups. This year, in an effort to assist students with less experience submitting proposals, we provided samples of previously funded proposals to applicants.

    Evaluation Process & Diversity Assessment

    In the 2020 GREG - R.C. Lewontin Early Award competition, the R.C. Lewontin Early Award Committee received 210 applications. Each application was assigned to two evaluators from the evaluation committee, who scored the applications on five criteria (see Evaluation Criteria). All application scores were standardized within evaluators to account for scoring variation among evaluators, then ranked across the entire pool of applications. The top-ranked applications were sent into a second round of evaluation with three evaluators each. 

    The SSE Diversity Committee assessed the percentage of applicants from different institution locations and types, as well as the responses to six demographic questions (see tables below). The highest-ranked applications from under-represented areas were selected for the second round of evaluation. Additional highly ranked applications selected by the Diversity Committee made the demographics of the recipients more representative of the applicant pool (see tables below).

    34 applications were sent into the second round of evaluation; 23 applications were selected as recipients. 

    DATA PRIVACY STATEMENT: Upon completion of each competition, answers to demographic questions were anonymized and disassociated with all identifying information. Anonymized responses will be archived in order to analyze the composition of applicant pools over time. 

    Funding Sources

    The GREG R.C. Lewontin Award budget allowed for funding of 20 applications. Three additional grants were funded by donations to the George W. Gilchrist Student Support Fund, donations to the GREG awards fund, and funds from the SSE President’s discretionary annual budget allocation.

    2020 Applicant Institution Data:

    Institution Location Applicant Pool Recipients
    U.S. or Canada 88.57% 91.30%
    International 11.43% 8.70%

     

    Institution Type* Applicant Pool Recipients
    R1 80.00% 78.26%
    non-R1 14.29% 13.04%
    International 5.71% 8.70%

    *US institutions are classified as R1 or Non-R1 by their research activity according to The Carnegie Classification of Institutions in Higher Education.  All institutions outside the US are included in the International category here.

     

    2020 Applicant Demographic Data:

    Which best describes your racial/ethnic identity? Choose all that apply. Applicant Pool Recipients
    White/non Hispanic 65.71% 60.87%
    Latinx or Hispanic 12.38% 13.04%
    Black or African American 1.43% 4.35%
    American Indian/Alaskan Native/First Nations/Indigenous/Aboriginal 0.00% 0.00%
    South Asian/East Asian/Southeast Asian 10.95% 13.04%
    Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.00% 0.00%
    Multi-racial 0.00% 0.00%
    Other 0.95% 4.35%
    Prefer not to say 1.43% 0.00%

      

    With which gender do you identify? Applicant Pool Recipients
    Man 44.29% 52.17%
    Woman 53.81% 47.83%
    Non-binary/genderqueer/agender 1.43% 0.00%
    Other 0.00% 0.00%
    Prefer not to say 0.48% 0.00%

     

    Is your gender identity the same as the gender you were assigned at birth? Applicant Pool Recipients
    Yes (I am cisgender) 98.10% 95.65%
    No (I am transgender) OR Prefer not to say 1.90% 4.35%

     

    Which best describes your sexual orientation? Applicant Pool Recipients
    Heterosexual 71.43% 69.57%
    LGBTQ+ OR Prefer not to say 28.57% 30.43%
         Gay 3.33%
         Lesbian 0.48%
         Bisexual 11.43%
         Queer 4.29%
         Pansexual 1.43%
         Asexual 2.38%
         Prefer not to say 5.24%

     

    Do you have any disabilities? Please check all that apply. Applicant Pool Recipients
    Checked one or more 18.10% 17.39%
    None 77.14% 73.91%
    Prefer not to say 4.76% 8.70%

     

    Were you the first of your family to graduate from college/university (often called a “first generation” college graduate)? Applicant Pool Recipients
    Yes 24.76% 17.39%
    No 74.76% 86.36%
    Prefer not to say 0.48% 0.00%

    View full page

    The Evolution Highlights series will highlight some of the interesting and varied papers published within the last few years in Evolution. The goal of these Evolution Highlights is to let our readers learn more about how the highlighted study came into existence, and to invite the authors to share stories and tips from the perspective of a recently published author. We welcome nominations and self-nominations for the Evolution Highlights. Find out how to submit a paper here.

    Ecological divergence plays an important role in strong but complex reproductive isolation in campions (Silene)

    Ecological divergence plays an important role in strong but complex reproductive isolation in campions (Silene)
    Karrenberg S, X Liu, E Hallander, A Favre, J Herforth‐Rahmé, A Widmer
     
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/evo.13652

    Abstract:
    New species arise through the evolution of reproductive barriers between formerly interbreeding lineages. Yet, comprehensive assessments of potential reproductive barriers, which are needed to make inferences on processes driving speciation, are only available for a limited number of systems. In this study, we estimated individual and cumulative strengths of seven prezygotic and six postzygotic reproductive barriers between the recently diverged taxa Silene dioica (L.) Clairv. and S. latifolia Poiret using both published and new data. A combination of multiple partial reproductive barriers resulted in near‐complete reproductive isolation between S. dioica and S. latifolia, consistent with earlier estimates of gene flow between the taxa. Extrinsic barriers associated with adaptive ecological divergence were most important, while intrinsic postzygotic barriers had moderate individual strength but contributed only little to total reproductive isolation. These findings are in line with ecological divergence as driver of speciation. We further found extensive variation in extrinsic reproductive isolation, ranging from sites with very strong selection against migrants and hybrids to intermediate sites where substantial hybridization is possible. This situation may allow for, or even promote, heterogeneous genetic divergence.

    Evolution Highlight by Sophie Karrenberg
    Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University

    What gave you the idea for this study?

    Realizing that reproductive isolation can be complex (a long time ago).

    What was the big question you were trying to ask and why was it exciting?

    How do new species form?

    In what ways does this study expand or build on your previous studies?

    The study builds on quite a number of previous studies that focus on individual reproductive barriers in our study system as well as on recent conceptual studies (e.g. Sobel and Chen 2014). One of the unique aspects of our study is that we consider, report and interpret variation in (ecologically mediated) reproductive isolation across sites.

    From your perspective, what was the most interesting or intriguing aspect of this study?

    Variation in ecologically mediated reproductive isolation.

    Were there any unexpected logistical or technical challenges you had to address?

    many ... but not more than usual for field work :-)

    Did your work take you to any interesting locations? If so, what were they like?

    Yes, wonderfully beautiful mountain localities in Valais, Switzerland (data re-analyzed in present study)

    Did you have to learn any new analytical techniques for this study?

    always learning...

    How did writing up this study compare to previous paper writing experiences?

    Very nice! This work is kind of a synthesis of more than 10 years of work at both ETH Zurich and Uppsala University. I am very thankful that I had the possibility to do this and to interact with Adrien Favre, Joelle Herforth-Rahmé, Xiaodong Liu, Emelie Hallander and with my long-term collaborator Alex Widmer. Alex and I developed the broad idea for this study some time around 2007.

    What was the review / revision process like?

    Very good with constructive comments!

    Looking back, what is one thing you learned from doing this study (other than your main findings) that you’ll use in future projects?

    Don't give up.

    What do you think will be the lasting impact of this study?

    I hope that more people will get interested in variability in reproductive isolation and in complex reproductive isolation. Also, this work is very important for further speciation studies in this Silene system.

    Sophie Karrenberg smiling at the camera

    Dr. Sophie Karrenberg
     
      

     
    a pink flower

    Silene dioica
     
     
     
     
    a white flower

    Silene latifolia
     
     
     
     
     

    a roped off field with trees and mountains in the background

    Transplant site near Leuk, Valais, Switzerland


    View full page

    The Evolution Highlights series highlights some of the interesting and varied papers published within the last few years in Evolution. The goal of these Evolution Highlights is to let our readers learn more about how the highlighted study came into existence, and to invite the authors to share stories and tips from the perspective of a recently published author. We welcome nominations and self-nominations for the Evolution Highlights. Find out how to submit a paper here.

    In love and war: The morphometric and phylogenetic basis of ornamentation, and the evolution of male display behavior, in the livebearer genus Poecilia.
    Goldberg, D.L., Landy, J.A., Travis, J., Springer, M.S. and Reznick, D.N. 
     
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/evo.13671

    Abstract:

    Exaggerated male traits under sexual selection are often used for both competition and courtship, raising the question of whether ornaments evolved simultaneously for both functions, or if use in one context preceded use in another. Here, we apply a phylogenetic approach to study the evolution of ornamental dorsal fins in male poeciliid fish of the subgenera Mollienesia and Limia, which exhibit convergent development of an enlarged dorsal fin, and often direct erect‐fin displays to male and female conspecifics. Unlike prior categorical assessments of poeciliid adornments, we measure dorsal fin exaggeration with a continuous index of ornamentation. Phylogenetic logistic and generalized least squares regression analyses indicate that high index values are significantly associated with the use of two component postures of courtship and aggressive displays, dorsal fin erection and body curvature, but not with the presence of sexual dichromatism. Male displays initially evolved for male–male aggression in the common ancestor of Mollienesia and Limia, suggesting that this signal originated for competition, then became co‐opted for courtship. These results support the armament‐ornament hypothesis for evolution of exaggerated male traits, and are consistent with an evolutionary shift in the predominant mechanisms of sexual selection from intra‐ to intersexual.

    Evolution Highlight by Daniel Lorenz Goldberg
    School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University

    What gave you the idea for this study?

    It was our senior author David Reznick who gave me this idea, when I started as a Master's student in his laboratory at the University of California Riverside, after I had been working there for two years as an undergraduate. He wanted to know if there was a relationship between male behavioral traits and the size of the male dorsal fin in mollies and Limia, and wanted someone to do a phylogenetic study of the evolution of these traits. It seemed like too good of an idea to pass up, so we quickly rounded up our UCR systematics expert, Mark Springer, who agreed to help me create the phylogenetic tree. Next on board were David Reznick's colleagues at Florida State University, Joseph Travis and his student Alex Landy, who were instrumental in devising the index of ornamentation that was the key takeaway and the real selling point of this study.

    What was the big question you were trying to ask and why was it exciting?

    We wanted to know whether male dorsal fin displays in mollies and Limia -- specifically two behaviors, the sigmoid S-shaped body posture, and dorsal fin erection -- originally evolved for the purpose of courting females or competing with other males in dominance displays. In other words, was the trait co-opted from its original function for use in a second, additional function; and did this co-option precede extreme trait exaggeration in a few species? (In our study, these were the sailfin mollies and the humpback Limia). This was a question that had seldom been tackled since the armament-ornament hypothesis was originally proposed in the mid 1990s, and only one prior study had been done in poeciliids before ours. So we were really in uncharted waters here, pun intended.

    In what ways does this study expand or build on your previous studies?

    The aforementioned poeciliid study had found that dark vertical bars flashed by male swordtail fish had originated as a mating display but then became co-opted as an aggressive display. This was, however, the opposite pattern than the one predicted by the original armament-ornament hypothesis, and we wanted to determine if mollies and Limia fit the pattern of traits used in aggression becoming larger and more flamboyant as sexually-selected courtship signals.

    From your perspective, what was the most interesting or intriguing aspect of this study?

    The most intriguing aspect of the study was the fact that behavioral repertoires of many mollies and Limia are not well documented in the literature. I had to sift through a variety of livebearer hobbyist magazine articles, old dissertations from past Reznick lab members, and Wischnath's Atlas of Livebearers with its color photographs. Three species that we obtained novel behavioral information from had never been observed in captivity before our study.

    Were there any unexpected logistical or technical challenges you had to address?

    We went without data for Pamphorichthys for the longest time, even though those five species fill the phylogenetic gap between mollies and Limia, because there were simply very few collections of them that we could obtain size measurements from. Finally, in the summer of 2016, Dr. Reznick got a couple of colleagues in Brazil to measure their museum specimens of Pamphorichthys to give us the missing size values. The sad thing is, the Pamphorichthys specimens were housed at the National Museum in Rio de Janeiro that later burned up in a massive fire, so I suspect that those alcohol-preserved fish may now only exist as measurements in our study and perhaps a few others.

    Did your work take you to any interesting locations? If so, what were they like?

    I myself did not need to venture away from UCR to conduct this research, but some of the live fish we observed in captivity came from interesting locations. Manfred Schartl, who sent us never-before-seen videos of the Liberty molly, a species that I determined possessed courtship, had his fish shipped live from Germany to the United States!

    Tell us something about collecting these data that people might not know or think about.

    It is much easier to obtain dorsal fin measurements from anesthetized live fish (which Alex Landy did using the Ptacek collections at the University of Clemson) than it is to obtain the same measurements for preserved museum fish (which I did for most of the other specimens). The formalin and ethanol really dry out the fins and make them relatively brittle, so you cannot spread them fully. Luckily, all I needed was the length of the longest fin ray, so I did not end up damaging the specimens to collect this information.

    Did you have to learn any new analytical techniques for this study?

    Absolutely! All of the systematics software that I used to create the phylogenetic tree was new to me, so Dr. Springer had to train me in how to operate those programs.

    What was the most challenging part of analyzing your data?

    The MatLab software that I used to run the phylogenetic logistic and least-squares regressions was fickle for its long processing times and very specific code that had to be entered to run the programs. I can't tell you how many times I had to rerun those programs and reenter data values to do so!

    What was your writing process like?

    The manuscript was adapted from my Master's thesis, which was over twice the length that the final journal article ended up reaching. I had to trim down the thesis and add some new data, which took me most of the summer of 2016, and then I had to complete this on and off over the next few years, given that I was working with a totally different study system for my Ph.D. research in Illinois.

    What was the biggest challenge about writing the manuscript?

    Keeping it at the proper length! There was a lot I wanted to communicate and a limited amount of words that I could use, so I went through several revisions of having to take out and replace certain ideas, especially in the Discussion, but it all came together well in the end.

    How did writing up this study compare to previous paper writing experiences?

    This was by far the longest article that I had written to date, so it was definitely a labor of love.

    What was the review / revision process like?

    I was amazed that the editors thought the article had a decent chance right off of the bat, and it only took a few submissions before they finally accepted it, which I am eminently grateful for. Most of their suggested changes were easy to make. The biggest challenge came with their request for a concise but detailed description of the ornamentation index and how we calculated, for which I ultimately got Joe Travis to help write a short version of its rationale. Shortly after that, the editors accepted our manuscript.

    Do you have any writing tips for others?

    The literature is your friend, period. Read a lot! Collect a motley assortment of journal articles (via Zotero, for example) and save them in folders on your computer based on their topic. That way, you can refer back to when you are writing about a certain topic. If I hadn't scoured the literature for studies testing the armament-ornament hypothesis, I never would have realized that this hypothesis was the perfect way to frame our study of ornament evolution in mollies and Limia.

    Was this study collaborative with other groups? If so, what was valuable about that experience?

    It was collaborative with Dr. Reznick's Brazilian colleagues, as well as a variety of molly researchers and aficionados who I reached out to. It was a valuable experience because I got to know people who I would later meet in person at academic conferences!

    Looking back, what is one thing you learned from doing this study (other than your main findings) that you’ll use in future projects?

    Using phylogenetic software and making the molly and Limia family tree really whetted my appetite for systematic studies, particularly those focused on the evolution of animal behavior. The NCBI Taxonomy database and the program it interfaces with, Geneious, were so helpful in my eyes that I went back to use them for one of my Ph.D. dissertation projects!

    What do you think will be the lasting impact of this study?

    It serves to offer an example of the most species-rich group of animals to date that show co-option of an armament into an ornament, and furthermore illustrate how the gain of a display function for sexual selection can go hand-in-hand not only with extreme trait exaggeration, but also rapid evolution of many species in a group that is now experiencing increased sexual selection.

    What was the most difficult part of this study and / or the most rewarding?

    The most rewarding part of this study was getting it published! Not every Master's student can achieve that with his or her research, and I feel very blessed that Evolution allowed me to publish my work in such a prestigious journal. I don't mean to boast, but it was also rewarding to get what I think is a genuinely original idea out there into the science sphere!

    How would you explain your study to a five-year-old?

    There are these fish called mollies and Limia, and males of these fish have big fins on their backs. But we didn't know why their fins are so big. We compared many different fish and found that those with the biggest fins use their fins not only to appear attractive, but also to fight each other! And the most interesting thing of all is that the fins appear to have first been used for fighting, before they were also used by some of these fish to look pretty.


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    Courting Limia species


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Haw Chuan Lim smiling at the cameraHaw Chuan Lim
    Assistant Professor
    Department of Biology
    George Mason University
    https://sites.google.com/view/gmuevogen/home
    Twitter: @hawchuan
    Start date: August 2017

    PhD: Louisiana State University; Advisor: Frederick Sheldon.
    Postdoc: Smithsonian Institution; Advisor: Michael Braun, Robert Fleischer. Postdoctoral Fellow (University of Illinois, Sydney Cameron).

     
     

    About the department:

    I am an assistant professor of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics at the Biology department. The department is the second largest in the University in terms of undergraduate population. It has a rapidly growing graduate program, with five new tenure-track faculties hired in the last 3 years. It is highly collegial and interactive, and with GMU located in the greater DC region, we also have plenty of opportunities to interact and collaborate with researchers outside of the campus.

    About the research:

    I am an evolutionary biologist whose goal is to understand how geographic, ecological and historical drivers interact to create, maintain, and distribute biological diversity at various spatio-temporal scales. My research focus has been on avian phylogenetics, population genetics, speciation and biogeography – especially on birds from tropical Southeast Asia. Members of my lab group use the same evolutionary biology principles, combine them with genomic techniques and computational analyses, to address questions related to pollinator pathogens, animal gut microbiome, management of captive populations, mammalian phylogenetics and adaptation of sparrows to coastal environments.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    Many people have seen the pie chart of time allocation for a postdoc vs a PI. As a PI, my attention gets divided across many more things (the slices of the pie get really, really thin): teaching (and giving partial credits), course design, ordering equipment and kits, grant writing, protocol development, planning projects with students and monitoring progress, etc. Thus, my biggest challenge is to find time to keep up with the latest developments in my fields and be inquisitive.

    How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

    Every new lab member gets a graduate student primer that contains a combination of a pep talk, expectations (on both the student and the PI), program overview and authorship guidelines. Our program also provides a framework for working out an Individual Development Plan for each student. This makes it a lot easier to lay out the milestones. My mentoring style is to fully equip new students with internal and external resources and know-hows, encourage peer support and not micro-manage.

    Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

    My first publication in Evolution was a part of my PhD dissertation. It was hot then to do ecological niche modeling. So, I combined paleoclimatic projections, ecological niche modeling and statistical phylogeography to investigate mechanisms that drove population divergence in SE Asian bird species. I even managed to squeeze the name of one of my heroes - Alfred Russel Wallace - into the title of the paper.

    Besides research, how do you promote science?

    I try to be involved in projects that have conservation or management implications. For projects related to pollinator resource use and pathogens, we work closely with and explain our science to various stakeholders such as Business School students (who raise funds by selling bee-related goods), landfill operator and elementary school students.

    Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

    Yes, I teach Population Genetics, which is essentially microevolution. This is a core course for Mason’s Biocomplexity and Evolution Biology PhD track. I also teach Bioinformatics and Landscape genetics, which are related to the analysis and application of evolutionary biology data.

    Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

    Probably coalescence and its various complications (eg structured coalescence).

    Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

    I often give talks to park staff and members of the public when I travel to the tropics to conduct fieldwork. The talks often relate to the biogeographic history of the region through the lens of avian evolution.

    How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

    Just as how human society is impacted by human-human interactions at various scales and past events, the natural world is a product of “horizontal” ecological interactions and “vertical” evolutionary history. If members of the public and policy makers want to have a sophisticated understanding of our natural world (e.g. why certain species are “good” reservoirs for viruses, how will communities form or degrade as plants and animals face novel conditions under climate change) in order for human societies to flourish, we will need to understand evolution.

    Do you have a time management tip to share?

    My tip is to try to mix up the day. This allows one to stay productive through the day by doing various tasks that do not require the same resource (e.g, writing, admin, lab work, replying to email, review papers, grading).

    What is your favorite app?

    A podcast app (CastBox) and Sudoku/word game for downtime.

    Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

    Science Friday.

    What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

    Sam Kean’s The Violinist’s Thumb.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Think outside the box and explore. Attend lots of seminars and discuss science with peers who different types of research.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

    Be deliberate about your publications and how your efforts are being attributed in various research you partake in.

    How was your first faculty meeting?

    It was great – got a warm welcome. A very friendly bunch here at GMU Biology department.

    Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

    Other than the mind going blank? No.

    What is something most people don’t know about you?

    I want to get a tear drop trailer or boat to travel the country. Maybe the former...

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    Outdoors stuff like kayaking, birding, mountain biking, hiking.


     

     


     

     


     
    Haw Chuan Lim holding a peacock
     

     

     
     
     

     

     
     
     
     

     

     
     
     
     

     

     
     
     
     

     

     
     
     
     

     
    Haw Chuan Lim sitting on a log


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Alison Pischedda smiling at the cameraAlison Pischedda
    Assistant Professor
    Department of Biology
    Barnard College
    https://www.pischeddalab.com
    Twitter: @AlisonPischedda
    Start date: July 2017

    Masters: Queen's University (Canada). Advisor: Adam Chippindale.
    PhD: University of California, Santa Barbara; Advisor: Bill Rice.
    Postdoc: University of California, Santa Barbara; Advisor: Tom Turner.
     

    About the department:

    Barnard College is a liberal arts college for women affiliated with Columbia University in New York City. This affiliation gives faculty and students the best of both worlds: a small liberal arts college environment with access to the resources of a large research school. Faculty in the Biology Department specialize in diverse fields of biology, and students can conduct research at Barnard, Columbia, or other institutions throughout the New York City area.

    About the research:

    My research uses the fruit fly model system, Drosophila melanogaster, to examine the evolutionary and genetic causes and consequences of sexual selection and sexual conflict. Specifically, I am interested in the evolution of male and female sexual behaviors and mate choice preferences, and the extent to which male-female interactions are beneficial or costly to each sex. My research uses an integrative approach, drawing from the fields of animal behavior, evolutionary biology and genetics.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    Without a doubt, my biggest challenge as a PI so far has been navigating the COVID-19 pandemic. There are the obvious challenges associated with keeping our fruit flies alive while shutting down the research lab (I’ve been maintaining them from home), remote teaching, and “working” from home with a 3-year-old. But the biggest challenge was trying to maintain a sense of community among lab members when we couldn’t be together: walking the balance between providing a sense of normalcy while also acknowledging that things were in no way normal, and communicating that it was ok not to be ok. I’m still working on this balance.

    How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

    Work in my lab is very collaborative in that all students help care for the fruit fly populations and help each other with their experiments. Training new lab members is usually a group effort and we hold regular lab meetings to introduce new members to the projects they are helping with. I also try to meet one-on-one with new students in my lab at least twice a semester to get a feel for their interests and short/longer-term goals.

    Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

    My lab is composed entirely of undergraduates, so I recruit new lab members almost every semester as students graduate, new projects start, and class schedules change. I try to attract a diverse group of applicants by sending out an email announcement when I’m looking for students, but beyond that, it largely comes down to enthusiasm for our research and schedule compatibility (are you available when the flies need you?). 

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    I’m dating myself here, but my first Evolution Meeting was the 2004 meeting in Fort Collins, Colorado. I had just started my Master’s program and was so nervous about giving a talk at such a large, international conference. The meeting was so influential for me – it was when I decided I definitely wanted to pursue a PhD. I was a first-generation college student who discovered research relatively late, but the meeting was one of the first times I could really “see” myself as an evolutionary biologist and felt a part of this academic community.

    Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

    I definitely remember my first (first-author) publication in Evolution! I had accumulated several rejections from Evolution over the years, but kept trying! Good thing I did - the rejection streak was broken in 2015, which was followed by two more acceptances over the next three years.

    Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

    I teach an animal behavior class with a strong evolution focus. I think the main concept that blows students’ mind is natural selection’s ability to produce amazing and bizarre adaptations in animals. Bombardier beetles that release caustic gas when attacked; the Iranian spider-tailed viper that mimics a spider to attract prey; birds-of-paradise courtship rituals; parasites that can manipulate the behavior of their hosts. It’s so fun to introduce these examples and see jaws drop!

    Do you have a favorite science podcast or blog?

    Although he no longer technically has a blog, I’m a huge fan of anything written by Ed Yong, and have followed him since his Not Exactly Rocket Science days.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Get on Twitter! Even if you never tweet and only follow, I find the academic community on Twitter to be a (generally) supportive place. Being part of this community can help you network, learn about new discoveries in your field and beyond, and give you access to individuals, viewpoints and representation beyond your home institution.

    How was your first faculty meeting?

    It might not have been my first faculty meeting, but at one of my earliest meetings we discussed a faculty search we were doing that year. I had been on the job market for several years and it was such a surreal experience to see a job search from the other side!

    Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

    So many mistakes (even now as a PI)! Improper labeling, losing flies, forgetting to do something that was time sensitive, accidentally putting flies in the freezer instead of the incubator. I make sure students in my lab know I’ve made mistakes so that when they do, they are (hopefully) comfortable telling me so we can problem solve together and come up with a strategy to avoid similar mistakes in the future.

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    My free time is mainly spent trying to get outdoors with my husband and daughter. We live north of the city, so there are lots of hiking trails, rivers and lakes to explore.


     
     
     
    a lab bench and window overlooking the city


    View full page

    The Society for the Study of Evolution announces the election of the SSE President-Elect to be in place on January 1, 2021. The election will be conducted online from December 7 to December 21, 2020. You can learn more about the President-Elect's duties and responsibilities in the SSE Officers Handbook

    Click each candidate's name to jump to their statement and a link to their CV. Once you have made your choice, access the ballot to cast your vote by clicking the "Vote Now" button or clicking this link. Thank you for your participation!

    SSE President-Elect: Laura F. Galloway, Emília P. Martins
     

    Or click here to view the ballot.

    Deadline: December 21, 2020

     
     
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

    Laura F. Galloway, Department of Biology, University of Virginia

    View CV

    I am honored to be considered for the office of President of the Society for the Study of Evolution. SSE has been important to me throughout my career, providing a platform for my first national research presentation and the first publication from my dissertation. SSE is my scientific home and community. I consider service to academic societies an essential part of my professional life, and have been pleased to give back to this society through service as a member of Council, North American Vice President, Associate Editor for Evolution, reviewer of countless Rosemary Grant proposals, and as a member of the Dobzhansky and Gould award committees. I have also served as an Editor or Associate Editor for New Phytologist, Ecology and Proceedings for the Royal Society B, as well as Treasurer and Executive Committee member for the Botanical Society of America, and member of several American Society of Naturalist committees. My research has long used ecological and quantitative genetics to explore mechanisms and patterns of evolution in natural plant populations. Recently, I have been working to understand the contribution of cytonuclear interactions to incipient speciation, as well as the causes of range-wide patterns of mating system variation in a phylogeographic context. 

    What challenges does SSE face today? To maintain our leading role and vitality, SSE must be relevant to the next generation of evolutionary biologists. Our ability to recruit and support evolutionary biologists from across socioeconomic, racial, ethnic, identity, and national backgrounds will broaden the study of evolution as well as lead to greater interest in the field by the public. I embrace SSE’s action plan for enhancing diversity, equity and inclusion. As President, my priority will be building institutional machinery to increase diversity both in our membership and our leadership. I have been, and will continue to be, a champion of initiatives supporting early-career members by promoting networking, professional development and career awareness, particularly non-academic careers. I appreciate the Graduate Student Advisory Council’s efforts in this area, and commit to increasing our portfolio of these activities at the Evolution meeting and SSE social media outlets.

    As President, I will also work to make sure that SSE is open and inviting to the full breadth of research in evolutionary biology, that our meetings are a platform for sharing this research, and that our journals are sought-after outlets for publication. To do this, I will work with the society leadership and our publisher to ensure that Evolution maintains its status as a premier journal given the increasing number of outlets for the publication of evolutionary research. In addition, innovations to meetings as a result of the pandemic present an opportunity to expand the scope of our meeting by carrying forward successful on-line elements. We also have the opportunity to employ new formats to help us engage more members when we meet in person. I will work with the organizers to keep the Evolution meeting a forward-looking and open venue with a variety of platforms for sharing science.

    SSE is a vibrant scientific society with a strong membership, journal, annual meeting and an active, engaged early-career community. As President, I will work to maintain and expand upon these strengths by undertaking initiatives to position SSE as a “must join” society for evolutionary biologists across a broadening field, and by making sure we are a welcoming professional community for an increasingly diverse group of scientists.

     
     

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

    Emília P. Martins, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University

    View CV

    I am honored to have been nominated to serve as President of the SSE. I first joined SSE as a graduate student nearly 30 years ago, when I published my first paper in Evolution and attended the first of many SSE conferences. Since then, I’ve also served once on the SSE Council and twice on the Evolution editorial board. With each of these and many more interactions, I’ve benefited tremendously from SSE’s historic goal of crossing disciplinary barriers and bringing together diverse perspectives. I’m ready now to help ensure that SSE continues that tradition into the future.

    If elected, my primary goal will be to help SSE develop initiatives that engage and foster the careers of a more diverse community of evolutionary biologists, including especially Indigenous, Black, Latinx, and other people of color from around the world. I am deeply and personally committed to increasing diversity in the sciences, and over the years, have designed and directed several initiatives to broaden participation. I am pleased that SSE has taken recent steps towards equity and inclusion, building on the long-standing UDE program with a new diversity committee, awards, and financial priorities. However, much work remains to be done. We need to listen actively to diverse voices, to educate ourselves about racism in the history of evolutionary biology, and to take decisive action to correct the damage. We need to set tangible goals, and to put reliable systems for assessing progress into place.

    These are challenging times, and evolutionary biologists are uniquely positioned to contribute to global discussions on health disparities, evolving pathogens, genetic manipulation, climate change, and biodiversity. In addition to maintaining an outstanding journal, building community, and fostering the careers of its junior members, SSE has an opportunity to play a leadership role in shaping future visions and policies. I welcome an opportunity to participate in this effort, especially in strengthening links to other societies and agencies. Together, we can do much more than we can alone.


    View full page

     

    SSE recognizes that the society membership is not reflective of the diversity in the field of evolutionary biology, and that professional societies have played a role in excluding underrepresented scientists from STEM as a whole. The SSE Council has committed to sweeping action to increase inclusion of and support for members of historically excluded groups, particularly individuals who identify as Black, Indigenous, or people of color (BIPOC), in all of the Society’s activities and programs and in evolutionary biology as a whole. 

    As a first step in increasing support, SSE is beginning a new initiative: the SSE Membership Award. Beginning in 2020, this award will offer free two-year SSE memberships to 100 individuals of any career stage who identify as racial or ethnic minorities, either in their country of origin or their country of residence. There is no application deadline; after 100 awards are made, this initiative will expire. Learn more about the brief application process and apply here: https://forms.gle/xBWqKfjDsWXeYbGq9 

    Why are society memberships a relevant first step in building support? Membership offers opportunities for networking and community-building, eligibility for other societal awards, access to journal articles and special conference events, and reduced publication and conference registration fees. We realize this is just one step of many, and we are committed to making sure our community is welcoming and supportive of scientists from all backgrounds and identities.

    Eligibility and evaluation: Successful applicants will identify as members of racially or ethnically underrepresented communities, either in their country of origin or their current country of residence. SSE strongly believes that every member has a unique perspective to add to the society, enriching the community as a whole. The application process includes a 500-word statement on how a membership in SSE would benefit the applicant and any circumstances that have previously prevented the applicant from joining, as well as highlighting the unique perspective or background that affect the applicant's approach to science. Individuals currently eligible for free membership via the Global Membership Assistance (GMA) Program are not eligible for this award.

    Apply Now button

    We appreciate your patience as your application is reviewed. If you have any questions, please contact either the SSE Diversity Committee (diversity@evolutionsociety.org) or SSE Communications (communications@evolutionsociety.org).


    View full page

    This award, formerly called the R. A. Fisher Prize, was renamed the SSE Presidents’ Award for Outstanding Dissertation Paper in Evolution in June 2020. This prize, first established in 2006, is awarded annually for an exceptional PhD dissertation paper published in the journal Evolution. The award comes with a $1000 honorarium. Nominations are due in January of each year. Learn more about the award here.

    The original name of the prize was chosen to acknowledge Fisher’s extensive, foundational contributions to the study of evolution, particularly through his development of population genetic and quantitative genetic theory. Alongside his work integrating principles of Mendelian inheritance with processes of evolutionary change in populations and applying these advances in agriculture, Fisher established key aspects of theory and practice of statistics. 

    Fisher, along with other geneticists of the time, extended these ideas to human populations and strongly promoted eugenic policies—selectively favoring reproduction of people of accomplishment and societal stature, with the objective of genetically “improving” human societies. Fisher and other geneticists, ignoring logical flaws certain to undermine the efficacy of this program, were highly influential in promoting eugenic policies. Fisher in particular maintained his support for these ideas even after others had abandoned them. The eugenics movement was founded in racist ideologies, and although eugenics has been repudiated by the evolution community, the field of population genetics continues to carry the mark of its historical connections to eugenics (read more here), causing harm to Black, Indigenous, Latinx and other communities of color. We sincerely regret that authors of color may have chosen not to submit their work for consideration for this award because of its name. 

    For these reasons, the SSE Council voted in 2020 to change the name of the award, shifting its focus to the scholarly achievements of the awardee. The name also acknowledges that the winning paper is chosen by the three current society presidents. Going forward, SSE recognizes the need to continue to invest significant effort toward making our Society and our field more inclusive and more equitable. The Diversity Committee, established in 2017, has galvanized SSE’s major strides towards this goal, and welcomes input and involvement from the membership in prioritizing and carrying out its initiatives (read more here). 

    In September 2020, SSE Council approved a suite of actions proposed by the Diversity Committee to increase inclusion of and support for members of historically excluded groups in the field of evolutionary biology and through all of the activities of SSE. Updates on the progress of these actions can be found on the SSE website.


    Further reading:
    Bodmer, W., Bailey, R.A., Charlesworth, B. et al. The outstanding scientist, R.A. Fisher: his views on eugenics and race. Heredity 126, 565–576 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-020-00394-6

    "Ronald Fisher Is Not Being ‘Cancelled’, But His Eugenic Advocacy Should Have Consequences" by Eric Michael Johnson


    View full page

    Background

    SSE is aware that historical and modern-day cultural biases and lack of diversity in an applicant pool may lead to biases in the allocation of grants, prizes, and awards. Beginning with the 2020 Graduate Research Excellence Grant competitions, SSE requested voluntary demographic information from award applicants in an effort to address bias and promote equity in awarding across multiple axes of diversity. Answering demographic questions was voluntary—each question was required but included a “Prefer not to say” option. Answers to the demographic questions were not available to the evaluation committee during the first step of the evaluation process—the scoring and ranking of application materials (described here). The demographic data were used to assess the diversity of the applicant pool and the differences between the composition of the applicant pool and the recipient population.

    We are still in the process of gathering demographic data on our membership, and so were unable to assess differences between the diversity of the applicant pool or recipient population and our total membership during this round of awards. As part of SSE’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, the GREG Award Committees are working with the SSE Diversity Committee to pursue equity in awarding, as well as efforts to increase award proposals from those who identify as belonging to historically excluded groups. In 2020, in an effort to assist students with less experience submitting proposals, we provided samples of previously funded proposals to applicants.

    Evaluation Process & Diversity Assessment

    Demographic information is not part of the evaluation process and is not available to reviewers at any time during the proposal review process. Anonymized information is used by the SSE Diversity Committee to assess the demographic composition of the applicant pool and of the pool of awardees, and when necessary, the Diversity Committee recommends additional awards to better align the awardee pool with the applicants. Only staff working on behalf of the society—not in academic science—have access to identifiable demographic data for the sake of reporting. All data are stored securely in keeping with the SSE Data Privacy Policy. We welcome any comments or concerns you might have about this process.

    In the 2020 GREG - Rosemary Grant Advanced Award competition, the award committee received 107 applications. Each application was randomly assigned, avoiding conflicts of interest, to three evaluators from the evaluation committee, who scored the applications on five criteria (see Evaluation Criteria). All application scores were standardized within evaluators to account for scoring variation among evaluators, then ranked across the entire pool of applications. Thirteen projects were chosen as awardees based on application scores and demographic data.

    DATA PRIVACY STATEMENT: Upon completion of each competition, answers to demographic questions were anonymized and disassociated with all identifying information. Anonymized responses will be archived in order to analyze the composition of applicant pools over time.

    Funding Sources

    The GREG Rosemary Grant Advanced Award budget allowed for funding of 10 applications. Two additional grants were funded by donations to the George W. Gilchrist Student Support Fund, and one additional grant was funded in part by the SSE President’s discretionary annual budget allocation.



    Institution Data Summary:

    Institution Location Applicants Recipients
    United States 78.50% 69.23%
    Canada 4.67% 7.69%
    International 16.82% 23.08%


     

    InstitutionType* Applicants Recipients
    R1 64.49% 61.54%
    Non-R1 14.02% 15.38%
    International 21.50% 30.77%


    *US institutions are classified as R1 or Non-R1 by their research activity according to
    The Carnegie Classification of Institutions in Higher Education.  All institutions outside the US are included in the International category here.

    Demographic Data Summary:

    Which best describes your racial/ethnic identity? Choose all that apply. Applicants* Recipients*
    White/non Hispanic 66.36% 38.46%
    Latinx or Hispanic 13.08% 15.38%
    Black or African American 1.87% 15.38%
    Indian/Alaskan Native/First Nations/Indigenous/Aboriginal 0.00% 0.00%
    South Asian/East Asian/Southeast Asian 14.95% 30.77%
    Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.93% 0.00%
    West Asian or North African (also called Middle Eastern) 1.87% 0.00%
    Multi-racial 3.74% 15.38%
    Other (write in) 0.93% 0.00%
    Prefer not to say 1.87% 0.00%

    *Percentages do not sum to 100% because applicants were able to select multiple options.

    With which gender do you identify? Applicants Recipients
    Man 42.06% 30.77%
    Woman 56.07% 61.54%
    Non-binary/genderqueer/agender OR Prefer not to say* 1.87% 7.69%

    *These options have been pooled to preserve anonymity.

    Is your gender identity the same as the gender you were assigned at birth? Applicants Recipients
    Yes (I am cisgender) 98.13% 92.31%
    No (I am transgender) OR Prefer not to say* 1.87% 7.69%

    *These options have been pooled to preserve anonymity.

    Which best describes your sexual orientation? Applicants Recipients
    Heterosexual 75.70% 84.62%
    Asexual OR Bisexual OR Queer OR Lesbian OR Gay*                     17.76% 15.38%
    Prefer not to say 6.54% 0.00%

    *These options have been pooled to preserve anonymity.

    Do you have any disabilities? These may include: impairments related to hearing, visual processing, learning, mobility/orthopedics; physiological disabilities; mental health-related disabilities. Applicants Recipients
    Yes 9.35% 0.00%
    No 86.92% 100.00%
    Prefer not to say 3.74% 0.00%

    Were you the first of your family to graduate from college/university (often called a “first generation” college graduate)? Applicants Recipients
    Yes 24.30% 23.08%
    No 74.77% 76.92%
    Prefer not to say 0.93% 0.00%


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Sangeet Lamichhaney wearing a dark blue shirt looking at the cameraDr. Sangeet Lamichhaney
    Assistant Professor
    Department of Biological Sciences
    Kent State University
    https://theomicslab.wordpress.com/
    Twitter: @meetsangeet
    Start date: August, 2019

    PhD: Uppsala University, Sweden; Advisor: Prof. Leif Andersson.
    Postdoc: Harvard University; Advisor: Prof. Scott Edwards.

    About the department:

    Department of Biological Sciences is one of the largest departments within Kent State University. Faculty within the department have diverse research interest include aquatic ecology, evolutionary biology, microbiology, neurobiology and behavior, cell and molecular biology, genomics, and reproductive physiology. One of the department’s key strength lies in its active interdisciplinary research with other academic units, such as the School of Biomedical Sciences, Brain Health Research Institute and Environmental Science and Design Research Initiative.

    About the research:

    I am an evolutionary biologist and our lab is broadly interested in understanding how an organism responds to novel environments. We are particularly interested in exploring the relative roles of evolutionary processes, such as genetic adaptation and phenotypic plasticity that underly trait evolution. We integrate a variety of interdisciplinary approaches, including comparative ‘omics’ (Genomics, Metagenomics, Transcriptomics, Epigenomics and Metabolomics), Ecology and Natural history to uncover the molecular basis underlying the processes of adaptive evolution. We work with a variety of non-model systems that includes birds, lizards, frogs and mammals.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    The first challenge was the mental switchover from being a postdoc to a PI. Suddenly realizing you have all the decision making power on future research projects, hiring human resource in the lab, making financial decision etc., was challenging in early days.

    What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

    Being a new PI, I quickly realized that science is not just about your own research project and the lab (the life of a postdoc), but also lot more about communication, outreach and networking. During these pandemic times, how you quickly learn to adapt to different methods of teaching, mentoring, and doing research has been surprising.

    Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

    Yes, I am actively recruiting grad students and postdocs. As our lab is focussed on multidisciplinary research; we aim to choose new lab members who do not hesitate to learn new skills and methods.

    When and why did you become a SSE member?

    I became SSE member in 2019. Being an evolutionary biologist, I believe this was the ideal society to join as a member.

    Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

    Before I ever attended the "evolution meeting", I misinterpreted the "meeting" word. I always thought it was some sort of small "meeting" within specific subject area on evolution. I was taken aback on my first participation when I actually realized the "meeting" in fact had >2500 people participating and I could meet/see almost all big names in the field of evolutionary biology.

    Besides research, how do you promote science?

    Promoting science for me has been mostly by the usage of social media, giving talks in non scientific forums, taking to media outlets etc.

    Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

    Yes, I teach evolution and I enjoy it the most. As my current research is mostly on hybrid speciation, I find the concept "new speciation by hybridization" the hardest concept to teach and explain how far we have come over the ages from the traditional definition of speciation.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Graduate studies gives you lot of time (so precious) to learn new skills and explore new research areas. Never hesitate to go outside your comfort zone to learn new things.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

    Many postdocs continue to have the same mindset as senior grad student. Start to think like a PI already. Develop smart time management skills, as a postdoc you have limited time but you have lot on your hands in terms of publishing your graduate research, starting new independent research, looking for jobs etc.

    How was your first faculty meeting?

    My first faculty meeting was on the second week of my official start date. I have to admit that rather than focusing on the discussion being done in the meeting, I was just enjoying the moment that I was sitting there as a "faculty."

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    Watching sports.

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
      
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Corlett Wood smiling at the cameraCorlett Wood
    Assistant Professor
    Biology
    University of Pennsylvania
    https://www.the-wood-lab.net/
    Twitter: @corlettwwood
    Start date: July 2020

    PhD: University of Virginia; Advisor: Butch Brodie.
    Postdoc: University of Toronto; Advisor: John Stinchcombe.

    About the department:

    I’m a new assistant professor in Penn’s Biology Department, located in downtown Philadelphia. We're a broad biology department: ongoing research ranges from cellular and developmental biology to molecular genetics to ecology and evolution. I started my job during the COVID pandemic, which has been very strange. I’m looking forward to meeting my new colleagues in person after this is all over!

    About the research:

    My lab studies the evolution and ecology of host-symbiont interactions. We’re especially interested in interactions involving multiple symbionts, when the host’s response to one symbiont has cascading effects on others. Our research is driven by two big questions: When do these cascading effects constrain adaptation in species interactions, and how do they influence the assembly of host-associated communities? We use plants (mostly the legumes genus Medicago) and their microscopic root mutualists and parasites to tackle these questions, drawing on approaches ranging from quantitative genetics to population genomics to field ecology in wild plant populations.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    Learning how to be a good mentor. Facilitating my trainees’ success is probably the most impactful thing I do in science, and I find that responsibility really humbling. It’s especially challenging because I know that good mentorship is individualized: effective advocacy, advice, and support look very differently for trainees at different career stages, from different backgrounds, or with different career goals.

    Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

    Yes, I’d always love to hear from folks interested in joining my lab! I tend to look for people who are curious, creative, and kind: folks who are excited about biological questions, driven to find novel ways to answer them, and who will change our lab community for the better. I don’t place a strong emphasis on specific skills when recruiting, because I think the point of joining a lab as a trainee is to learn new things.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    My first meeting was in 2010 in Portland, Oregon. Because it was my very first conference, it was definitely intimidating and overwhelming, but I still distinctly remember feeling like I had found my people. I’ve attended every Evolution meeting since, and that feeling hasn't changed.

    Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

    Shout-out to Market Science, an outreach program that brings hands-on science exhibits to city farmers’ markets! My lab got involved at the University of Pittsburgh, where I was an assistant professor for two years before moving to Penn (Market Science started at the University of Minnesota; Maria Rebolleda-Gómez brought it to Pitt when she was a postdoc). Our exhibit, “Farmers’ Invisible Friends,” was all about plant roots and plant-microbe mutualisms: as a souvenir, kids got to plant their own bean seed in a “rhizotron” (a plastic CD case) and take it home to watch all the cool things their plant was doing underground.

    Do you have a time management tip to share?

    Break down big projects like manuscripts and grants into bite-sized pieces: concrete tasks that you can accomplish in an hour or less. I’ve found that this helps me make consistent progress, especially now that my time is more fragmented than it was as a grad student or postdoc. An added bonus for me is that it decreases the activation energy associated with working on something big and hard like a grant or a manuscript, since each bite-sized task isn’t scary enough to procrastinate on!

    What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

    I loved “The Beak of the Finch” by Jonathan Weiner. It’s essentially a chronicle of Rosemary and Peter Grant’s beautiful work on Darwin’s finches, interwoven with the history and fundamentals of evolution by natural selection. I read it when I was a junior in college and was hooked: at the time, I was an English major, but the next semester I registered for my first upper-level biology class. That book is part of the reason I'm an evolutionary biologist today.

    Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

    Here’s one that I remember vividly (there have been many, many more!): I spent an entire day measuring hundreds of beetles. When I was done, I sorted the spreadsheet column containing all my measurements—but I only sorted that column, which disassociated each measurement from the beetle it belonged to. Then I saved the file. I fessed up to my research mentor, who reassured me that it wasn’t the end of the world, and suggested that I call it quits for the day. (I spent the whole next day re-measuring beetles.) These days when I make a mistake, I still try to follow my mentor’s advice: figure out what you need to do to recover, and then take a break – you probably need it.

     
     
     
     
     
     
    Nodule and gall diagram 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     a forest path with a trowel
     
     


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Jacqueline in a blue shirt smiling at the cameraJacqueline Sztepanacz
    She/her/hers
    Assistant Professor
    Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
    University of Toronto
    Website: https://sztepanacz.eeb.utoronto.ca/
    Twitter: ;@jsztepanacz
    Start date: July 2019

     
    Masters: University of Ottawa; Advisor: Howard Rundle.
    PhD: University of Queensland; Advisor: Mark Blows.
    Postdoc: Florida State University; Advisor: David Houle and Thomas F. Hansen (University of Oslo).

    About the department:

    I’m at the main St. George Campus of the EEB Department at the University of Toronto. The EEB department is made of an amazing group of researchers at three campuses and the Royal Ontario Museum, with diverse research foci ranging from disease ecology, to biodiversity and systematics, theoretical biology, and genetics and genomics. We also have large graduate program with truly impressive graduate students that are a pleasure to work with.

    About the research:

    My long-term research objective is to understand why traits stop evolving. The broad questions we’re working on include: how genetic variation is maintained in populations, how the genetic architecture of traits and selection interact to potentially limit evolution, and how antagonistic pleiotropy within or between sexes may limit evolution. We tackle these questions with quantitative genetics and genomics, comparative analyses, and develop new approaches for the analysis of multivariate data. We use Drosophila as a model organism, and most of what we do involves assays of fitness, morphology, behaviour, and pheromones. My main study organism, D. serrata, is particularly appealing as a model organism due to its relevance in sexual selection and conflict research, and more recently as a model for climate change research, enabling a variety of perspectives in projects.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    One of the biggest challenges for me has been finding a way to consistently make progress on projects, instead of saving them up for the rare, large blocks, of open time in my schedule. As a new PI who is growing their lab, I’m still the driver for many of the projects that happen in the lab, and am still figuring out the best way to protect my science-time. I recently reached out to some colleagues for their tips, and one nugget of advice I received was “remember that obsolescence and senescence come to all of us, often at the same time....”. So, even if I never figure out the optimal strategy, I can look forward to my students teaching me things in a few years.

    Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

    Yes, I am recruiting! I’m on the lookout for enthusiastic and hard-working students who have a genuine curiosity to understand the living world and a passion for science.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    My first Evolution meeting wasn’t until in 2016 in Austin (not counting the joint meeting in 2012 in Ottawa). I gave a talk and met my future postdoc advisor, so I would have to say the meeting had a very positive impact on my career.

    Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

    Yes, my first paper was published in Evolution in 2012! We had an excellent Associate Editor and reviewers, and it came back with major revisions on the first round. It was a great first experience with publishing, and Evolution remains one of my favourite journals to publish in. Actually, many of my papers are published in Evolution, and I just had one accepted in February.

    Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

    Since starting my faculty position, I haven’t been involved in Evolution outreach, but it’s something that I hope to get back into. During grad school I was a Young Science Ambassador for a program called Wonder of Science. We went to rural Queensland schools to support science education for students in rural and Indigenous communities. Interacting with these students and teaching them about science was a really fun and rewarding experience.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    My one piece of advice would be to treat grad school like it’s your job and not your identity. What I mean by that is, go to work (or your work-from-home couch, these days) every day and love what you do, and then go home and take a break. Enjoy life outside of grad school and remember that failures in grad school are not failures in life, learn from them, and keep going.

    How was your first faculty meeting?

    My first faculty meeting was about a week after I arrived on campus, which was great timing to meet many of my colleagues. So far, I’ve really enjoyed the faculty meetings and learning about the goings-on and inner workings of the department. We also have awesome pastries and other breakfast items. Turns out, enthusiasm for free food doesn’t end when you get a job!


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    A line of plugged vials on a white table


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     


     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    A bottle of flies


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Nora Mitchell in a red shirt and backwards black baseball cap outside in a field smiling at the cameraNora Mitchell
    She/her/hers
    Assistant Professor
    Biology
    University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire
    Website: noramitchell.weebly.com
    Twitter: @nora_flora10
    Start date: September 2019

    Undergraduate: Williams College; Advisor: Joan Edwards.
    PhD: University of Connecticut; Advisor: Kent Holsinger.
    Postdoc: University of New Mexico; Advisor: Ken Whitney.

    About the department:

    The University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire is a regional comprehensive university, part of the larger University of Wisconsin system. We are a primarily undergraduate institution, and the Biology department spans many diverse research and teaching topics. We have many opportunities to conduct hands-on research with undergraduate collaborators throughout the academic year and summer months

    About the research:

    I am broadly interested in plant evolution and hybridization at multiple phylogenetic and temporal scales. Our lab uses long-term field experiments, population genetic studies, phylogenomics, and comparative methods to ask questions about the evolutionary consequences and mechanisms of hybridization in plants. We are currently working on documenting patterns of genetic and trait diversity of perennial Helianthus (sunflower) species in the Upper Midwest in both natural and common garden environments. My research philosophy is to learn more about these fundamental and fascinating questions in evolutionary biology while empowering students to gain research experience that will help them to discover and achieve their career goals.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    I think the biggest challenge has been the move from postdoc (99% research) back to focusing on teaching/mentoring/service, and finding the right balance. This has been especially hard during the pandemic, where it is unclear how research productivity would go during a 'normal' year (whatever that is!). l love all aspects of being at a primarily undergraduate institution (PUI), but that does not mean that it's without challenges! Sometimes I see the term "PI" and wonder if it applies to me, since I am not at a large research institution, but in some ways researchers are even more "principal" at PUIs! I play many roles in the lab, those that would usually be held by technicians/managers, postdocs, grad students, etc., but it has also been amazing to be more hands-on and get to work with undergraduate researchers more closely. I am extremely grateful for that aspect of this job.

    How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

    At a PUI almost all lab members are new lab members, which is exciting and challenging at the same time. I try to develop group cohesiveness because a lot of what we do is very teamwork oriented. They have different backgrounds in biology, so I try to scaffold their research skills by reading different papers, hands-on lab and field training, and even learning R! Lab members also have very diverse career goals (medical-oriented vs ecology/evolution-oriented), so I try to focus their skills and give them resources as individuals to help them get what they need.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    My first Evolution Meeting was in 2016 in Austin, Texas, which was the last summer before I defended my Ph.D. It was really great to meet with and talk to some many people whose work I had read and followed closely. I did not know it at the time, but my postdoc would bring me back to live in Austin for an extended summer of fieldwork! It was hot at the meeting, and it was hot in the field too (and I quickly discovered that there are more fire ants in the field than in the conference center).

    Do you remember your first publication in Evolution or Evolution Letters (acceptance or rejection)?

    The first paper I submitted to Evolution ended up being rejected after resubmission, which was definitely disappointing at the time (the main conclusions were not impactful enough), but we transferred it to Ecology and Evolution pretty smoothly, and now I'm an Associate Editor at Ecology and Evolution so I think it worked out pretty well! I think that we need to do a better job conveying the fact that rejection is common in our field, and that rejection (or major revisions) does not necessarily mean that the work is bad, just that there are ways to make it stronger or the fit is not right for that particular journal/grant.

    Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

    I teach an upper-level undergraduate course in Evolution - students come from a diversity of backgrounds and interests in biology. This semester we started with reading and discussion of the Graves (2019) article "African Americans in evolutionary science: where we have been, and what’s next" published in Evolution: Education and Outreach. Most students reflected that they had not discussed or learned about aspects of racism in science, or sometimes in their education more broadly. Others began to tie together concepts they had learned in other courses and how they relate to the "who" of science and evolutionary biology.

    The other concept that really sparks them is the evolution of behavior, such as aspects of sexual selection or migration in relation to climate change. As a plant person I find this a little disappointing, but I think some of them are still floored by the fact that some plants have separate sexes, too!

    What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

    These may be subfield-specific, but I really like "The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation" (Dolph Schluter) and "A Primer of Ecological Genetics" (Jeffrey Conner and Daniel Hartl), both are books I keep referring back to for both teaching and research.

    In a slightly different direction, for plant people or those on the ecological side of evolution, definitely "Braiding Sweetgrass" (Robin Wall Kimmerer) - so insightful, beautifully written, and just a perfect blend of science and Indigenous teachings.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Think about what skills and experiences you want or need for your future - if you don't know what that future is, that's okay too! In particular analytical skills (*cough* R *cough*), writing, and teaching are transferable to many different careers. Also don't be afraid of failure, and don't forget that as a graduate student you are also a person, and to try to maintain the personal relationships, hobbies, etc. that make you you.

    What is something most people don’t know about you?

    Many people do not know that I was adopted from South Korea as a baby and I do not know any biological relatives at all! This may seem odd for a person who teaches about resemblance among relatives, population genetics, etc., but for me it is normal. 

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    I love running, playing ultimate frisbee, xc skiing, etc. I actually picked up ultimate in the third year of my Ph.D., and it has been a great way to make friends, connections, and stay active as I've moved across the country multiple times for work. I even (volunteer) coached as a postdoc, and have just started coaching again at UWEC!

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
    yellow flower in a field


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
    Nora Mitchelle in a black hat, green shirt, and tan pants in a field looking at a plant with yellow flowers


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
    Nora Mitchell standing in a forest facing four students who are watching her talk


    View full page

    The Evolution Highlights series highlights some of the interesting and varied papers published within the last few years in Evolution. The goal of these Evolution Highlights is to let our readers learn more about how the highlighted study came into existence, and to invite the authors to share stories and tips from the perspective of a recently published author. We welcome nominations and self-nominations for the Evolution Highlights. Find out how to submit a paper here.
     

    "Antibody-mediated crosslinking of gut bacteria hinders the spread of antibiotic resistance"
    Evolution 73-6: 1077-1088 (2019)
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/evo.13730

    Abstract:
    The body is home to a diverse microbiota, mainly in the gut. Resistant bacteria are selected by antibiotic treatments, and once resistance becomes widespread in a population of hosts, antibiotics become useless. Here, we develop a multiscale model of the interaction between antibiotic use and resistance spread in a host population, focusing on an important aspect of within‐host immunity. Antibodies secreted in the gut enchain bacteria upon division, yielding clonal clusters of bacteria. We demonstrate that immunity‐driven bacteria clustering can hinder the spread of a novel resistant bacterial strain in a host population. We quantify this effect both in the case where resistance preexists and in the case where acquiring a new resistance mutation is necessary for the bacteria to spread. We further show that the reduction of spread by clustering can be countered when immune hosts are silent carriers, and are less likely to get treated, and/or have more contacts. We demonstrate the robustness of our findings to including stochastic within‐host bacterial growth, a fitness cost of resistance, and its compensation. Our results highlight the importance of interactions between immunity and the spread of antibiotic resistance, and argue in the favor of vaccine‐based strategies to combat antibiotic resistance.

    Evolution Highlight by Anne-Florence Bitbol and Claude Loverdo (joint interview)
    Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, EPFL (Anne-Florence Bitbol)
    Laboratoire Jean Perrin, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine, CNRS & Sorbonne Universite (Claude Loverdo)
     
     

    What gave you the idea for this study?

    This strongly collaborative project arose from discussions between Claude and Anne-Florence. One of Anne-Florence's research goals is to quantify the impact of population structure on evolution. Claude's main research theme is to understand the interaction between the immune system and the bacteria in the gut. This project unites these two fields and our strengths. Specifically, an important recent finding in immunology, from Emma Slack's laboratory, and to which Florence and Claude contributed, is that antibodies secreted in the gut enchain daughter bacteria upon replication. Because clusters of bacteria cannot interact normally with the gut surface, this protects the host. But this clustering also gives a specific structure to the bacterial population, which can have a strong impact on its evolution. We thus decided to investigate the impact of this immunity-driven clustering on the evolution of antibiotic resistance.

    What was the big question you were trying to ask and why was it exciting?

    It was really exciting to develop models to find out possible new implications on evolution of a recent experimental discovery in immunology.

    Did your work take you to any interesting locations? If so, what were they like?

    This work involves analytical calculations and numerical simulations, so we only collected data from computers!

    Did you have to learn any new analytical techniques for this study?

    We combined our expertises for this work. In particular, Claude already had expertise in the formalism of branching processes. Meanwhile, Anne-Florence had already worked on modeling antibiotic resistance evolution and on population structure. Florence had acquired experience in numerical calculations and Loïc in numerical simulations. We all learned from one another in the process.

    What was your writing process like?

    As the rest of the project, the writing process was very collaborative, with all authors participating. Sometimes we could see different parts of our shared draft changing simultaneously and quite rapidly! It was great, but one small practical difficulty was to all agree on the same notations.

    What was the review / revision process like?

    The review and revision process was really nice and smooth for this paper, and we got great suggestions from both the reviewers and the editor. Sometimes this process can be painful, but for this paper it was definitely a pleasant one, and we really feel that the paper improved as a result.

    Was this study collaborative with other groups? If so, what was valuable about that experience?

    Again, this project was deeply collaborative, and we now continue to work together on related topics. It is the first paper involving both Claude and Anne-Florence. So this was really a great experience, and hopefully the start of a long collaboration. Crucially, we worked with our two PhD students: Florence (not to be confused with Anne-Florence!), who was Claude's PhD student, and Loïc, who is Anne-Florence's PhD student. They are joint first authors on this paper, and their contributions were amazing, both concerning analytical calculations and numerical simulations. They both proposed important ideas and went far beyond what we first thought of. So this was really a great collective project!

    What do you think will be the lasting impact of this study?

    We demonstrated that the clustering of bacteria driven by immunity hinders the emergence of antibiotic resistance. This is because clustering leads to a decrease in the bacterial diversity transmitted from one host to the next. We hope that our results will have practical impact because they shed light on an interesting interplay between vaccination and antibiotic treatment. Specifically, vaccination could reduce antibiotic resistance through this effect.


    View full page

    The Evolution Highlights series highlights some of the interesting and varied papers published within the last few years in Evolution. The goal of these Evolution Highlights is to let our readers learn more about how the highlighted study came into existence, and to invite the authors to share stories and tips from the perspective of a recently published author. We welcome nominations and self-nominations for the Evolution Highlights. Find out how to submit a paper here.

    "Comparing individual and population measures of senescence across 10 years in a wild insect population"
    Rodríguez‐Muñoz, R., Boonekamp, J.J., Liu, X.P., Skicko, I., Haugland Pedersen, S., Fisher, D.N., Hopwood, P. and Tregenza, T. (2019), Comparing individual and population measures of senescence across 10 years in a wild insect population. Evolution, 73: 293-302. doi:10.1111/evo.13674
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/evo.13674

    Abstract:
    Declines in survival and performance with advancing age (senescence) have been widely documented in natural populations, but whether patterns of senescence across traits reflect a common underlying process of biological ageing remains unclear. Senescence is typically characterized via assessments of the rate of change in mortality with age (actuarial senescence) or the rate of change in phenotypic performance with age (phenotypic senescence). Although both phenomena are considered indicative of underlying declines in somatic integrity, whether actuarial and phenotypic senescence rates are actually correlated has yet to be established. Here we present evidence of both actuarial and phenotypic senescence from a decade‐long longitudinal field study of wild insects. By tagging every individual and using continuous video monitoring with a network of up to 140 video cameras, we were able to record survival and behavioral data on an entire adult population of field crickets. This reveals that both actuarial and phenotypic senescence vary substantially across 10 annual generations. This variation allows us to identify a strong correlation between actuarial and phenotypic measures of senescence. Our study demonstrates age‐related phenotypic declines reflected in population level mortality rates and reveals that observations of senescence in a single year may not be representative of a general pattern.

    Evolution Highlight by Tom Tregenza
    Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Pernyn Campus

    What gave you the idea for this study?

    We’ve been studying a population of crickets in a meadow in Northern Spain for the last 14 years. We call the project ‘WildCrickets’. Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz and I started the project partly because we started to wonder how relevant all the lab studies that we’d been doing really were, and partly because Rolando was keen to do some work in his native Asturias. We originally focussed on trying to measure natural and sexual selection in the wild and really, just trying to get an idea of what wild insects get up to. Rolando noticed that late in the breeding season those adults that are left become very sluggish, in stark contrast to the zippy little speed-merchants that dash into their burrows at the slightest stimulus early in the season. We started to wonder whether they were experiencing senescence despite only being a few weeks old as adults and a little over a year old in total.

    What was the big question you were trying to ask and why was it exciting?

    Senescence is an area full of really interesting questions. It’s absolutely central to the life history of all organisms. It’s the product of evolution and not some mysterious inevitability, and it’s really not very well understood at all. Added to that is the fact that we all eventually start to wonder about why we’re getting old and knackered. The thing we wanted to focus on in this study was whether the increase in the probability that an organism will die as it gets older is reflected in declines in its physiological state.

    In what ways does this study expand or build on your previous studies?

    There are now quite a lot of studies of wild populations that show either that within populations the probability of dying increases with age (actuarial senescence) or that individuals decline in how well they can perform tasks as they get older (phenotypic senescence), but there are very few studies that allow these two metrics to be compared.

    From your perspective, what was the most interesting or intriguing aspect of this study?

    The thing I was most intrigued by was how much the pattern of ageing varied among years. In some of the ten years we studied, it was very clear, both in terms of actuarial and phenotypic senescence. In other years we couldn’t detect any signal of senescence at all.

    Were there any unexpected logistical or technical challenges you had to address?

    The whole WildCrickets project has been a series of logistical and technical challenges as we’ve developed the network of 140+ cameras that we use to record as much as we can of the adult lives of every cricket in our meadow. For this project, the biggest challenge turned out to be getting to grips with the horrendous statistics that are needed to quantify patterns of senescence.

    Did your work take you to any interesting locations? If so, what were they like?

    Our meadow, which is between the mountains and the sea halfway along the north coast of Spain, is a beautiful spot. I always enjoy the juxtaposition between all the technology we have in there; fibre optic convertors and laser surveying equipment and suchlike and the meadow inhabitants making their homes amongst it all.

    Tell us something about collecting these data that people might not know or think about.

    A great deal of the claims made by CCTV camera and video-capture companies are wilfully exaggerated, or just plain false. We have to try dozens of different bits of kit before finding one that actually works. If you’re planning to video record animals in nature in a situation where cameras are metres (rather than dozens of metres) apart drop us a line and if we can help, we will.

    Did you have to learn any new analytical techniques for this study?

    Yes! Analysing ageing data is very tricky; you don’t expect linear patterns and the individuals that survive to an old age are not a random sample of the population. We more or less recruited Jelle Boonekamp specifically to assist in the analysis of the data, and input from reviewers proved to be very important as well.

    What was your writing process like?

    Because we’ve been piling up data since 2006, we often find it difficult to retain a tight enough focus to write a paper that can actually be digested without reading it being a major undertaking. We started off writing a single manuscript which was such hard work that most people we sent it to for comments more or less gave up on trying to understand it. Subsequently we broke the work up into this paper, and two others (“Rodríguez-Muñoz, R. Boonekamp Jelle, J. Fisher, D. Hopwood, P. & Tregenza, T. 2019 Slower senescence in a wild insect population in years with a more female-biased sex ratio. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 286, 20190286” and “Rodríguez-Muñoz, R. Boonekamp, JJ. Xingping, L. Skicko, I. Fisher, D. Hopwood, P. Tregenza, T. 2018 Testing the effect of early life reproductive effort on age-related decline in a wild insect. Evolution 73, 317-328”). This wasn’t an attempt to ‘sausage slice’ the work to lengthen our CVs, but turned out to be necessary to address specific questions. We write all our WildCrickets papers by dividing up the intro and discussion, the methods, and the results and writing those sections semi-independently with all the main authors bouncing these sections between us until we are happy with the final result.

    What was the biggest challenge about writing the manuscript?

    An unusual aspect of the review process for this manuscript was that when we submitted the work to Evolution we received some very positive reviews and a classic ‘reviewer 3’ review; the type that you read quickly, then need to go for a walk muttering about what a ******* the reviewer is. We left it a few days, then went through the comments again and ended up deciding they might have a point. Finally we completely reanalysed our data using the approach that the reviewer suggested. This led us to reach a quite different conclusion about what our study was showing, which was rather a humbling experience. We mention this point in the penultimate paragraph of the discussion, by which point hopefully a lot of readers will have already fallen asleep.

    Do you have any writing tips for others?

    By far my top tip is that the more people you can get to read and comment on your manuscript or grant application before you submit it, the better. I have literally never had a situation where I didn’t learn something from comments from colleagues. Even the ones that when you discuss it, you’re thinking ‘Christ, they don’t get it at all’ are very useful, because if they don’t get it, you can be certain they won’t be the only ones. I am very lucky in being based at Exeter’s Centre for Ecology and Conservation where I have loads of brainiac and super-nice colleagues upon whom I’m totally dependent for this sort of thing (and who would probably have sorted out the grammar in that sentence).

    Was this study collaborative with other groups? If so, what was valuable about that experience?

    The study was very collaborative in the sense that 17 people, mainly undergraduate students, who are not authors on the study but who spent some weeks helping us watch video are thanked in the acknowledgements, as are 7 colleagues who commented on the manuscript. Also the author list itself includes 3 graduate students Sophie Haugland-Pedersen, Ian Skicko and David Fisher whose own projects were independent of this work, but who took part in collecting data and our Chinese colleague Liu Xingping who was essential to our keeping on top of field monitoring in 2014 when there were several times as many adult crickets in our meadow as we get in a typical year.

    What do you think will be the lasting impact of this study?

    I hope that this study will help to reinforce the idea that we can study insects in the wild and that we need to do so for years at a time. If we had just studied a single year we would have got a completely misleading picture of what is going on in this system.

    What was the most difficult part of this study and / or the most rewarding?

    For me the two most rewarding parts of the study were firstly the opportunity to think about the nature of senescence itself and secondly the collaboration with Jelle Boonekamp that it precipitated, and which I am hoping will continue for many years to come.


    WildCrickets research group

     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     

     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
      
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
      
     
     


    Data collection 
     
     


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Brook Moyers wearing a sleeveless blue shirt and green necklace smiling at the camera in front of a blurred green backgroundBrook T. Moyers
    Assistant Professor
    Biology
    University of Massachusetts Boston
    http://moyerslab.science/
    @brooklebee
    Start date: January 2019

    PhD: University of British Columbia; Advisor: Loren Rieseberg.
    Postdoc: Colorado State University; Advisor: John McKay.

     
     
     
     
     
    About the department:


    UMass Boston is the third most diverse four-year college in the United States and the only public research university in the Boston area. It's a challenge and a delight to mentor and teach students from many backgrounds, with varied experiences and perspectives.

    About the research:

    The Moyers lab studies how and why traits vary within plant species to address real world problems, including food production and environmental contamination. We integrate approaches from the fields of ecology, physiology, genetics, and evolutionary biology. We work in the field, the greenhouse, the lab, and on high-performing computer clusters. Current systems include rice, cranberry, and Salicornia!

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    Feeling the burden of responsibility for my lab members' livelihoods and careers. Up until this point my productivity etc. only really impacted my own trajectory, but now I spend lots of time worrying about supporting and sustaining others.

    What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

    It can be lonely!

    Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

    My first Evolution Meeting was in 2009 in Moscow, Idaho. A bunch of us drove down from Vancouver, Canada: four Americans and one Canadian piled into one car. At the border, the officer looked at our passports and carefully singled out the Canadian. "Do you want to go with these people?" he asked, "Are you leaving the country of your own free will?" He thought we were kidnapping her!

    Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

    I teach a 200-level population evolution & ecology course, and I love how much phenotypic plasticity surprises and excites students! I think until that point they've exclusively been taught Mendelian genetics, and it's fun being the guide on their first foray into quantitative genetics.

    What is your favorite app?

    Do you hate emailing back and forth to schedule a one-on-one meeting? Me too! I am so glad I discovered Calendly, which can integrate with your calendar and video conferencing system and make scheduling SO EASY.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

    Apply broadly, especially to academic jobs! The rates of success are low, you're never entirely sure of what the hiring committee wants, and you might be surprised at how well an institution you've never heard of fits you and your goals.

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    I read way too much genre fiction. The pandemic hasn't helped: in 2020 I read 163 novels and novellas. My favorites of 2020 were Gideon the Ninth by Tamsyn Muir and all of the Murderbot Diaries by Martha Wells.


     
     
     
     
    a pink and green plant in the foreground, with a scientist standing in the background in a green field under a blue sky
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    in the foreground, a pair of hands holding scissors and cutting a plant, with a scientist looking down in the background


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Janna Willoughby wearing glasses and smiling at the cameraJanna Willoughby
    she/her
    Assistant Professor
    School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences
    Auburn University
    http://wp.auburn.edu/willoughbylab/
    ;@JannaWilloughby
    Start date: August, 2019

    PhD: Purdue University; Advisor: Andrew DeWoody.
    Postdoc: Purdue University; Advisor: Mark Christie.

    About the department:

    The School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences is a distinct unit at Auburn University. As a land grant institution, faculty in the school focus on research, teaching and outreach with expertise in topics ranging from silviculture, geospatial, socioeconomic, and of course ecology and evolution.

    About the research:

    My research program focuses on the response of wildlife populations to changes in their environment, often with an emphasis on endangered species and management. At a fundamental level, I am interested in how environmental change influences genetic diversity and complex traits like fitness. Currently, we are exploring this using banner-tailed kangaroo rat populations and freshwater mussels because these critters are so closely tied to their environment. Other work in my lab is determining how to most efficiently estimate the size of wild populations, particularly for species with very large populations or for those that exist at very low densities, using a combination of modeling and field work in the Alaskan bush.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    I have struggled with many things - learning to manage budgets and people are both big ones to me - but the biggest challenge has been dealing with the pandemic. I was about half way through teaching my first semester of courses when we went all online and I have been teaching online since. This has been a very weird way to learn how to be a good instructor! I think adjusting to online has been weird for students as well; I currently have three grad students in my lab, but I have not met any of them in person. Learning to navigate and work through these hurdles has taken a lot of time and patience, but I try to remind myself all the time that I am very privileged to list these things among my covid-19 pandemic worries.

    What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

    There is simultaneously a lot of help and very little help. Many people have generously offered suggestions about papers, potential funding outlets, and how to recruit graduate students and this is very valuable. But, how to print to the third floor copier from my office is still a mystery.

    When and why did you become a SSE member?

    I became an SSE member around 2012, when I went to my first Evolution meeting with my lab mates! As I recall there is a significant registration discount for members...

    What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

    I have met a lot of people at Evolution meetings, and had a chance to practice presenting and talking about my research with a crowd that is generally positive. Looking back, I personally really value that period of growth.

    Besides research, how do you promote science?

    Since starting at Auburn, I have focused my outreach time working with MANRRS. I like this group because there is an active chapter in my unit that focuses on college-level mentoring and professional development as well as a junior-level group that recruits students from the region. I have really enjoyed teaching the junior MANRRS students about genetics!

    Do you have a time management tip to share?

    I live by my calendar; if a task or event isn't on there it simply won't get done. I learned this from my mom who had the same policy about managing four kids' worth of activities: "If you don't put it on the calendar, you don't have a ride." - Mom, circa 1995

    What is your favorite app?

    My current favorite is Outlanders, which is a town building game. My husband and I have completed developer-supplied levels and now challenge each other with custom objectives in sandbox mode!

    What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

    The Three Body Problem by Liu Cixin. This is more of a physics book than biology, but the three body environment that exists in the story is extremely harsh, and this results in very unique phenotypes in the story! I found this part fascinating!

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    For me, it was sometimes easy to over-focus on class work, when I really needed to make progress on research or writing. I suggest my students who have similar struggles set time guidelines for themselves so they don't fall into this trap like I did!

    What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

    Being a postdoc can feel really isolating, so finding other postdocs to commiserate with is essential. ;-)

    Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

    Once I was doing a bunch of extractions and had sprung for one of the fancy 96-well plate Qiagen extraction kits. Everything was going fine but in the last centrifuge step I bumbled a plate and the liquid in the plate cascaded from row to row, like how an ice cube tray fills under the tap. After running a quick PCR and confirming the whole thing was a contamination nightmare (way more than 2 alleles per sample) I emailed my advisor with a note that was equally apologetic as it was panicked. He responded simply, "Buy more kits," and never said another thing about it.

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    Right now I am playing a lot of online D&D. My favorite character is a gnome sorcerer named Orola Folklore Bumblebutt who, along with 3 other ex-performers, is seeking vengeance for the destruction of their circus.


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Willoughby in the lab holding a pipette and looking seriously at the camera


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Kate Laskowski
    she/her
    Assistant Professor
    Evolution & Ecology
    University of California Davis
    ;@KateLaskowski
    https://laskowskilab.faculty.ucdavis.edu/
    Start date: September 2019

    PhD: University of Illinois; Advisor: Alison Bell.
    Postdoc: Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology & Inland Fisheries; Advisor: Max Wolf, Jens Krause, Thomas Mehner.

    About the department:

    The EVE department houses about 30 faculty members studying various aspects of ecology, evolution, and behavior. I'm also a member of the Center for Population Biology which is a large cross-departmental organization that brings together any faculty on UC Davis's campus that studies questions related to ecology and evolution. Our graduate students are housed within cross-departmental graduate groups so that students have access to any faculty interested in common research themes; I'm a member of the Population Biology Graduate Group and the Animal Behavior Graduate Group

    About the research:

    You're unique just like everyone else. But why have you, or any animal, developed such characteristic and distinctive patterns of behavior? The goal of my research is to understand how evolution has shaped the developmental mechanisms that determine how individuals use and integrate all the different sources of information they're exposed to over their lifetimes to determine their behavioral phenotypes. I exploit a naturally clonal fish, the Amazon molly, and high-resolution tracking systems that let me replay the developmental clock to test how and why individuals respond to different experiences in the way they do and what are the consequences of such behavioral changes.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    It's safe to say that my first year as a new professor did not turn out as planned between some professional turmoil (I had to retract 3 papers in the first 3 months of my new position) and then getting hit with the pandemic six months in. But I'd like to think that after these first two years, tenure will be a cake-walk! Learning how to navigate a new university system works and rebuilding my network here has been a major challenge. Though perhaps the most acute challenge has been building a fish room. Fish rooms contain lots of water, and water has a bad habit of being very difficult to contain. I now know far more about epoxy sealant and drains and how to replace ceiling tiles than I ever thought possible.

    What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

    Everyone tells you to expect this, but it's always difficult to imagine until you're faced with it - but wow, so many people want a piece of your time now! And you want to give your time to all these people, but it's just not possible. I thought I had good time management strategies before but I'm having to learn to adjust them and recalibrate how I set priorities.

    How have you prepared to be a PI?

    After I finished my PhD, I accepted a postdoc position at one of the Leibniz Institutes in Berlin. I ended up staying there for 6 years because I was able to secure my own independent funding. I think it was a really good set of training wheels where I had basically complete academic freedom to pursue the questions I was interested and figure out exactly how to do that, without also having the increased responsibility of all the managerial and administrative tasks that come with being a professor.

    How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

    My goal is to try and personalize my mentoring as much as possible to each student based on what their long term goals are. I want to help them identify their strengths so we can figure out better ways to help them shine but then just as importantly, help them recognize their weaknesses and look for ways to help improve those areas. I just had my first two students start this past Fall and I think there will be a lot of mutual mentorship going on! They're both very independent and I think joined a new lab because they were excited about the challenge of it and know that they will have just as big an impact on me as I will presumably have on them.

    Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

    I did not recruit any students to start in Fall 2021 because the pandemic has pushed everything back that trying to integrate another new student would be tough. But, I will be looking for at least one new student to start Fall 2022! In terms of how to choose lab members, I value folks that are eager to learn and have enough independence to push their projects forward. I also value whole humans and folks that value the truths that the animals tell us. The two rules of the Laskowski Lab can be summed up as 1) don't be a jerk and 2) don't fake data.

    When and why did you become a SSE member?

    My love of research started off in undergrad when I worked in a quantitative genetics fruit fly lab (Jeff Leips at UMBC). He was the one who really helped me understand what research is and pushed me to start asking questions about our world. He also supported me to attend several conferences, including a few Evolution meetings! So that is when I first became an SSE member and realized that there were whole organizations devoted to folks like me who were interested in evolutionary questions, which just blew my mind.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    I presented a poster on my undergrad research at the 2006 conference in Stony Brook and I just remember being blown away by the fact that folks that I had never met before were interested to hear in the work I was doing. It was so cool! I remember going to all the talks and just sitting there feeling mesmerized by all the interesting work. I couldn't take notes fast enough for all the cool information I was learning.

    Besides research, how do you promote science?

    I've been involved in outreach activities in a number of ways. In my previous position in Germany I would spend time in grade schools, teaching children about animal behavior and why it's cool to study. Studying animal behavior is great because it's really accessible to all folks. I'm looking forward to building my outreach network here in California. In grad school, I received an NSF GK-12 Fellowship that let me partner with a local high school teacher to develop new science curriculum - each class I worked with helped to raise stickleback babies (the fish I worked on at the time) and then designed small experiments to study their behavior. I would really like to recreate sometime similar here.

    Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

    Not yet! But I think this class will make it into my teaching rotation someday soon and I'm excited to teach it to students. But I took evolution as a course for the first time in undergrad and I remember learning about fitness landscapes and that just seemed like such an intuitive way to visualize and imagine how evolution worked.

    How do you think evolutionary research benefits society?

    Evolution shows us that incremental change can produce incredible results. But just as importantly, it also teaches us that sometimes the current solution is not necessarily the "ideal" one, but just the one that we're currently stuck with because of past history.

    Do you have a time management tip to share?

    Be honest with yourself. Sometimes it's really easy to trick ourselves into thinking we're working hard, when we're really not, or we're working hard but not on the high priority items. Every so often when I feel like I've hit a wall productivity-wise, I will start tracking how I spend my time. This lets me see which tasks are getting the most attention from me which I can then compare to my priority list. Most of time I realize these two things are out of alignment so then I can re-adjust and make sure higher priority tasks are getting the attention they deserve.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Read broadly and meet with seminar speakers! It's so important to be able to talk to scientists across all sorts of research areas, not just your own niche area. The best way to do that is to read papers outside of your zone and then meet with the visiting speakers to practice "talking shop" with different people. Plus it's just super fun!

    What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

    Start thinking about what your research "vision" is. What are the big questions that you want to tackle and why are they so interesting to you? This vision will be what sells you to job committees so you need to have a really clear idea of what it is yourself.

    How was your first faculty meeting?

    Surprisingly enjoyable. You always hear about how interminable faculty meetings can be, but luckily for me, the folks in my department are all incredibly collegial and really care about the research and teaching we do.

    Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

    Not to me personally I don't think. But at one conference, the AV system completely blanked out and I still remember watching Ned Dochtermann pivot to doing an unexpected "chalk talk" where he even re-created his graphs on the whiteboard. It was really impressive to watch!

    Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

    Too many. I've lost a whole summer's worth of data because I didn't back up some cameras. I've ruined equipment because I didn't double check settings. The only way to recover is to recognize the mistake, own up to it and then learn from it. I've expressed frustration to previous lab mates probably more than I should have. Luckily, I haven't made the same mistakes twice (yet).

    What is something most people don’t know about you?

    I'm actually a natural introvert but also have such terrible FOMO (fear of missing out) that I've trained myself to be exuberant in social settings. This can be really exhausting for me sometimes but I find the rewards almost always outweigh the stress of it.

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    I really love knitting and sewing. I am slowly working on creating my own wardrobe by hand. Hopefully it will be ready by the time in-person meetings are a thing again!


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     

     


    View full page

    The Society for the Study of Evolution announces the election of officers and Council members to be in place on January 1, 2022. The election will be conducted online from September 15 through September 29. You can learn more about each position's duties and responsibilities in the SSE Officers Handbook

    Click each candidate's name to jump to their statement and a link to their CV. Once you have made your choices, access the ballot to cast your vote by clicking the "Vote Now" button or clicking this link. Thank you for your participation!

    President-Elect: Victoria Sork, Kelly Zamudio,
    Non-North American Vice President: Hanna Kokko, Enrico Rezende
    Treasurer: Courtney J. Murren
    Councilors: Robin Tinghitella, Noah Whiteman, Christopher Balakrishnan, Regina Baucom, Daniel Bolnick, Angélica Cibrián-Jaramillo 

    The words Vote Now in white on a green background

    DEADLINE: September 29, 2021 at 11:59 PM EDT (UTC-4:00)

     

    President-Elect

     
    Victoria Sork
    , Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Institute of the Environment, University of California Los Angeles

    View CV

    It is an extreme honor to be nominated to serve as President of the Society for the Study of Evolution, a society that is about to observe its 75th Anniversary. Its title captures its mission and its journal published high quality articles in all areas of evolutionary biology. Early in my career, I decided that this society offered me the scientific identity that underlies my research in plant conservation, evolutionary ecology, and evolutionary genomics. Its annual meetings are the ones where I felt the most community, and its council members, executives, and presidents have included my closest colleagues and friends. The society governance has always been effective in advancing excellence in research evidenced by high quality journals and annual meetings and expanding membership. Over the years, the role of the President has expanded from a focus on scientific leadership to one of social responsibility. Like other areas of the academia, especially in the sciences, the demographic composition of our community does not represent that of society and I am proud that SSE is engaged in an agenda of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). It is equally important that SSE leadership join other societies to participate in public discourse on the social crises of our day, such as rapid climate change, spread of endemic diseases, and loss of biodiversity. Somehow, we need to play a role in enhancing public respect for science-based policies around these and other issues where evolutionary insight is so central. The next President of SSE must be committed to these challenges, and I would be privileged to assume that responsibility.

    As SSE President, I would prioritize three areas. First, the society has many ongoing activities and standing committees. I would engage with these efforts to ensure that we are making progress. In particular, I would review the editorial priorities for the journals and the breadth of high-quality papers but represents both the emerging areas of evolutionary biology and also those provide the scientific evidence for addressing societal problems where evolutionary insight will enhance public policy. Second, I would review the recently established DEI activities to assess their effectiveness and explore new practices to enhance the demographic composition of evolutionary biologist in academic and other professional careers. Third, I would work with leadership in other evolutionary and biological professional society to promote the use of evolutionary biology in the development of public policy and public discourse. The anti-intellectual attitudes of a significant portion of our society and leadership has undermined our effectiveness in reducing the human causes of climate change and the spread of COVID19. In addition, I would also utilize the networks of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences to promote SSE’s contribution to Professional societies must collaborate with other professional societies that are lobbying for evidence-based policies as well as funding for evolutionary research that provides the foundations for understanding nature and its conservation.

    During my career, I have benefitted from many experiences that I would bring to the position. In the past, I served on the editorial board of Evolution, was Treasurer for the American Society of Naturalist, and participated in numerous NSF review panels. I am a Senior Associate Editor for Molecular Ecology and editor for Molecular Biology and Evolution. My current research integrates landscape and evolutionary genomics with quantitative genetics of phenotypic traits to understand how local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity shape response of oak populations to rapidly warming climates. This research has let to my concern about evolutionary applications and science policy. As Dean of Life Sciences at UCLA for eleven years, I led several successful initiatives to promote diversity and equity and build inclusive classrooms. During this time, the number and percent of African-American and Latinx undergraduate biology majors, bioscience graduate students, and life science faculty has increased significantly at UCLA. As a fundraiser, I have learned communication skills needed to articulate the societal impact of biological research. Realizing that everyone nominated for leadership positions at SSE has a unique set of experiences that will advance the goals of SSE, I have humbly accepted this nomination in the event that my particular background would be helpful at this time when our professional societies must engender an agenda of social engagement as well as academic excellence.

    Back to top

     

     
    Kelly R. Zamudio, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin

    View CV

    I am honored to be considered for the Presidency of the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE). The SSE serves an engaged and highly active group of researchers and educators, and I would be proud to serve this community. More than ever, scientific societies play vital roles in supporting research communities, promoting and streamlining inclusive participation in science, and in publicizing the importance of science to society at large.

    • Promoting Advancement of Evolutionary Biology. One of my main goals as SSE president will be to continue and innovate the strong traditions that promote and enhance our research and our voice in the life sciences, with particular attention to inviting and encouraging ECR to engage in our governance and consider leadership positions in the future. The SSE has taken an active role in supporting early-career scientists by awarding grants to our graduate student members and providing other forms of networking and professional development. What I perceive as missing is the engagement of enlisting of early career scientists in their last years of post-docs and first years as assistant professors. We obviously do not want to burden ECRs with heavy service, but bringing them into positions on councils or committees impacts career trajectories in our community, and also helps diversify voices and opinions in our governing body. As SSE President, I will work to develop ways in which the Society can expand and broaden its support for ECR and advocate for a more direct pipeline that includes them in governance and decision-making.
    • Promoting diversity, equity, and inclusivity. We have made progress in our efforts to diversify our societies but we still have a lot of work to do to make opportunities in our field truly inclusive and equitable. The SSE has begun this important work, hosting workshops and activities to inform members and give voice to marginalized groups, developing best practices for award nomination and selection processes, and establishing codes of conduct to make the annual Evolution meetings safer and more inclusive. As President, I will work to center inclusion and equity in SSE’s activities. Specifically, I am interested in developing consortia with other societies, such as organismal biology focused societies, to design pathways that might encourage individuals to consider careers in organismal evolutionary biology, and bring new diverse members to our field.
    • Increasing the relevance of evolutionary biology to society at large. One thing that COVID-19 pandemic has made clear to us is that we live in a country in crisis when it comes to scientific literacy. There is clear opportunity for our society to expand its reach by encouraging and fostering good science communication. Many of our members are already active in science communication through Twitter accounts, personal blogs, writings for public outlets, and other avenues, promoting and publicizing evolutionary biology. I think we can increase our impact in this area and become an even more powerful force in educating non-scientists on the social importance of evolutionary biology. One of my goals is to identify a role for the Society in further publicizing these efforts, and in supporting the work of our creative science educators.

    My past service provides me with the experience and skills to effectively work toward these goals in SSE. My previous professional service has included serving as a Program Officer at NSF, where I helped with granting in the Systematics and Biodiversity Cluster, but also work on programmatic efforts to enhance funding in interdisciplinary and international research. The NSF has re-doubled their efforts in promoting cultural change in academia through societies – and this is an excellent time to be thinking about big ways in which SSE can make that difference. I also currently serve as the President of the American Genetic Association (AGA) and have served on its Council. I served on the AGA EECG Research Awards committee (awarded to graduate students and postdocs), and on the AGA DEI committee, and I am currently organizing the President’s Symposium for 2021. Additionally, I have a long history of actively supporting diversity and inclusion efforts. I have dedicated much of my service effort toward improving our workplaces and increasing opportunities for a diverse community. In 2017 the three evolution societies founded the Code of Conduct Committee, and as a founding member, I helped produce a set of standards and response procedures that now have been vetted by society leadership and implemented at annual meetings. We now have a series of events, outreach, and explicit norms and expectations all aimed at making our meetings welcoming to all attendees. I also served on the DEI committee of the Society for Systematic Biologists (SSB) and was the SSB representative to the Joint Meeting Council that oversees decisions about our joint annual meetings and policies/procedures implemented there.

    As a long-time member of SSE, I would be most honored to use these experiences and skills in service to our society. Thank you for your consideration.

    Back to top

     

    Non-North American Vice President

     
    Hanna Kokko,Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Switzerland

    View CV

    I felt very honored when I was asked to consider running for the role of the non-North American Vice President in the 2021 elections of the SSE. It feels a particularly important year to consider this role, as the pandemic challenges have made researchers much more sedentary when it comes to international travel — on the other hand, we are getting used to connecting via means that have already existed for a long time, but somehow never felt like the default option until now. I can imagine that the role of a person who does not reside in North America (and has actually never done so, but has nevertheless acquired a lot of scientific friends on that continent) would be to strengthen the global aspect of the SSE.

    There are obviously other aspects to a role like that, and bringing in a (partial) ‘outsider’ view. There’s tremendous and welcome emphasis on diversity in our field at the moment, and I could very well bring in expertise that I have gained both as a supervisor and in my various roles in grant funding agencies such as the European Research Council (until 2017, including being the panel chair towards the end of my 8-year period there) and the Swiss National Council, where right now changes and discussions are taking place to ensure that evaluation of scientific careers in competitive settings are as fair and balanced as possible.
    One could also extend the relevant discussions to how science might value different topics and approaches, e.g., by having a good healthy discussion of the role of long-term data collection, best open science practices, and taxonomic diversity in our study choices (I have published on these topics, see references below). Generally, what I love about evolutionary biology is that it combines the appreciation of unity of all life – there are processes that take place in every cell, and every life cycle, and can be best understood with model organisms – with an astonishing capacity of evolution to produce diversity. It would be great if our scientific approaches could, when viewed as a whole, embrace these different aspects of what we could study.

    Kokko, H. 2017. Give one species the task to come up with a theory that spans them all: what good can come out of that? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 284: 20171652.
    Meirmans, S., Butlin, R.K., Charmantier, A., Engelstädter, J., Groot, A., King, K.C., Kokko, H., Reid, J.M. & Neiman, M. 2019. Science policies: How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists’ perspective. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 32: 754-768.

    Back to top

     

     
    Enrico Rezende, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile

    View CV

    With regards to my priorities and how I may contribute to the SSE as non-North American Vice President, I believe the main contribution would be integration at several levels:

    1. Across disciplines - I am originally an animal physiologist with a strong background in evolutionary biology, that currently integrates empirical, comparative and theoretical approaches to study evolutionary questions ranging from phylogenetic effects in pollination networks, to the evolution of endothermy in the dinosaur lineage leading to birds or the strength of thermal selection in natural populations with ongoing global warming.
    1. Across regions/cultures - I pursued my academic career in five different countries (Chile, Brazil, USA, Spain and UK) and am quite familiar with multiple research groups working in ecology and evolutionary biology across Latin America, North America and Europe. Importantly, I was involved in the VI Escuela Latinoamericana de Evolución (ELAEVO), a two-week workshop for Latin American graduate students on different subjects in evolutionary biology (program here). This initiative started in 2009 and I was supposed to organize the ELAEVO in 2021, but this was not possible due to the pandemic.
    1. Across societies - I currently work as Senior Editor for Functional Ecology, and have very close ties with the British Ecological Society and their respective scientific journals.

    Overall, my impression is that I can contribute with the SSE by establishing a communication bridge with Latin America and, hopefully, by providing a valuable role model and high standards of excellence for young Latin American researchers. Being able to bring international researchers to do field work in South America would also be crucial to improve the quality of the education of young researchers. Finally, stronger academic voices are currently needed in South America given the current political scenario (e.g., last year I helped remove one of Bolsonaro's Minister of Education following a plagiarism scandal, links in the CV), and the association with the SSE provides a degree of respectability that may be important for the general public and/or policymakers around here.

    Back to top

     

    Treasurer

     
    Courtney J. Murren, Department of Biology, College of Charleston

    View CV

    I am honored to have been nominated for the Treasurer position at the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE). As a non-profit organization, the Society for the Study of Evolution can effect change and provide leadership in science through connecting members across institutions and organizations that vary in their emphasis in research, education and outreach. 

    I am interested in serving as SSE Treasurer, as I have experience serving on campus faculty-senate budget and compensation committees at my public institution. I contributed to evaluation of policy and assessed how budgets align with overall institution strategic plans. I have also had the privilege to serve on committees for the annual Evolution conference and the liaison committee for American Society of Naturalists. Both committees included budgetary aspects and budget parameters contributed to decision making. Budgets reflect many aspects of institutional mission and provide opportunities for evaluation of organization priorities as well as to institute change in accordance with the mission. 

    The SSE Treasurer position is an opportunity to give back to my professional society. This includes contributing to organization health by following SSE financial policies and procedures, and by reporting on budget activities and their alignment with SSE strategic goals. This also includes expanding ongoing efforts of the society by developing budget policies furthering support for students and early-career scholars, and by furthering activities that enhance inclusive, diverse, and climate-informed actions. Finally, I would maintain responsible financial stewardship established by prior society officers. 

    Back to top

     

    Councilors

     
    Robin M. Tinghitella, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Denver

    View CV

    I am delighted to be nominated to serve as a Council Member for the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE). Professional societies play a pivotal role in career development and advancement, help us to communicate and publicize important work and its policy implications, and promote connection and collaboration among diverse groups of scientists. I am pleased to say that the SSE has felt like home to me throughout my career, as I’ve attended meetings to share my own work as a graduate student, postdoc, and now a faculty member and mentor. I would be honored to give back to a society that has shown its continued support of early career researchers and commitment to inclusivity and equity. As a member of the Council, I would love to work with and learn from SSE officers and committee members, especially the Graduate Student Advisory Committee, the Education and Outreach Committee, the Diversity Committee, the International Committee, and others. My experiences as a student at a primarily undergraduate institution and as a faculty member at the University of Denver (DU) will allow me to share the perspectives of and advocate for society members who are from less established research universities and programs, but still do awesome things for our field.

    As a member of the SSE Council, I would be particularly interested in continuing to expand the successful work being done to foster the careers of budding evolutionary biologists and to promote justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) in evolutionary biology. For me, personally, the most impactful SSE programs have been SAFE Evolution, the Story Collider events, the small grant programs for graduate students, and the Undergraduate Diversity at Evolution program. As part of the SSE Council, I will work to develop ways in which the Society can expand and broaden its support for early career scientists, for instance through peer-to-peer mentorship programs for graduate students, postdocs (who unfortunately often fall through the cracks!), and early faculty. I will also advocate for society-wide initiatives that will improve climate for marginalized groups in evolutionary biology. I would like to see the SSE continue to center accessibility and inclusivity in all discussions. For instance, while I’ve desperately missed seeing friends and colleagues at in-person meetings over the last two years, it seems there is something important we can learn about accessibility from the increased international and student participation at the recent Virtual Evolution meetings. Finally, I am passionate about science communication and recently founded a science communication program aimed specifically at broadening participation. For our work to make a difference at national and global levels we need to foster an early interest in effective science communication and to provide a platform for early career scientists to engage with policy makers and educators. As a Council member I would be interested in finding ways to foster science communication training and practice at Evolution meetings and in offering opportunities for students to share their work with diverse types of audiences.

    What qualifications will help me make a meaningful contribution to the SSE?

    Contributions to Professional Societies:
    Over the years I have enjoyed contributing to my academic societies by serving as an Associate Editor for two society journals (including Evolution), volunteering as a mentor for undergraduate and graduate students at meetings, judging student talks and posters (including for the SSE’s W. D. Hamilton Award), reviewing graduate student grants, organizing symposia, and serving on scientific advisory committees. My own lab has benefited immensely from awards like the RC Lewontin Early Award, the Rosemary Grant Award, and Small Grants for Local and Regional Outreach offered through SSE.

    Leadership and Service: My primary leadership positions as a faculty member have focused on undergraduate/graduate education, mentorship, and JEDI issues. I served on our Graduate Committee from 2014-19 and Undergraduate Honors Committee from 2014-16, becoming chair of this committee in January 2019. In 2017 I was also elected to the university’s Honors Council. I recently became an inaugural member of DU’s Equity and Racial Justice committee and was one of five hand-picked faculty on a committee charged with developing DU’s first ever faculty mentorship program.

    JEDI: My commitment to justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion in life and work is evident in all major areas of my CV: professional appointments, funding, publications, teaching, mentorship, and service and community engagement. I have worked extensively in K-12 classrooms (see Science Education below), sought numerous opportunities to mentor minoritized students through programs like NSMentoring, DU Day of Action, and the E-STEM program of the Colorado-Wyoming Alliance for Minority Participation, co-founded a free summer camp for low-income and minoritized middle school girls, secured NSF funding to support attendance of 20 diverse early-career scientists at an international meeting, mentored a postdoctoral researcher whose work focused exclusively on inequity in STEM, contributed to the writing of a funded ADVANCE grant, and founded a science communication program aimed explicitly at broadening participation in the sciences.

    Science Education: As a postdoc, I was project manager for two NSF Graduate Fellows in K-12 Research grants at Michigan State University. Both programs paired graduate students with teachers and K-12 students at underserved rural schools to provide K-12 students with authentic science experiences and improve science communication and teaching skills of graduate student Fellows. These years instilled a strong commitment to science communication as an avenue to engage with my community and exposed me to severe inequities in access to STEM education. Since then, I have continued science education work by publishing case studies and Data Nuggets for use in ecology and evolution courses, establishing an interinstitutional CURE based on my research on the evolution of animal communication (see Ingley et al. in press), and researching how girls’ interest in careers in STEM, perception of science, and scientific self-efficacy are impacted by informal STEM experiences.

    Back to top

     

     
    Noah K. Whiteman, Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley

    View CV

    I am honored to be running for the Council of the Society for the Study of Evolution, a society that has played a fundamental role in shaping me as a scientist. The long-standing policy of the SSE that all meeting attendees, including students, are able to have a speaking slot is an example of why it holds such an important place in my scientific heart. Giving junior researchers a voice is the best way to encourage interest in our field and create long-term bonds to the society.

    My research group at UC-Berkeley follows from Charles Darwin and Alfred Russell Wallace, who focused on the evolution of new traits shaped by ecological interactions between organisms, whether within or between species. Such interactions are an evolutionary crucible in which new adaptations are forged, increasing the fitness of their bearers. Species interactions can also drive the evolution of reproductive isolation, resulting in the origin of new species. Lately, our work has tended to focus on understanding how toxins mediate species interactions—specifically, how toxins evolve, how they are perceived, resisted and even co-opted by animals. Toxins of biological origin can become keystone molecules, supporting the evolution and integration of diverse phenotypic modules in animals. The evolution of toxicity transforms animals from cryptic to conspicuous, nocturnal to diurnal, small to big, fast to slow, solitary to social, local to widespread, neglectful to doting parents and short- to long-lived. But toxicity is not only restricted to gaudy animals. A parallel transformation unfolded as cells of the animal immune system became armed with an arsenal of novel toxins that we also study.

    I was raised deep in the Sax-Zim bog of northern Minnesota, not far from the tiny Finnish township of Toivola, on the “Arctic Riviera.” I attended a K-12 public school with 125 other students in a district spanning hundreds of square miles. I then went to a small college in Minnesota and worked on co-evolutionary genetics of Galápagos hawks and their parasites for my dissertation research with Professor Patricia Parker in St. Louis. I was trained in genomics and molecular biology with Professors Naomi Pierce and Fred Ausubel at Harvard as an NIH NRSA postdoc. Once there, I began to develop a genomic model herbivore of Arabidopsis—a drosophilid fly called Scaptomyza flava that I found in a park living in wild mustards. We continue to study how these flies have adapted to feeding on these mustard oil-bearing plants.

    I am running for the SSE Council position because, in addition to all of the exciting science the society supports, I see an opportunity to give back to an organization that I believe has been on the forefront of making biology a more inclusive space. SSE has been a leader in transforming itself into a more equitable and diverse scientific society. Over the past three years, I have been working closely with Genetics Society of America as the first Chair of the GSA Equity and Inclusion (E&I) Committee. As my term comes to an end on that committee, I am excited about the potential to transfer my skills and knowledge to SSE. As part of a new program created by the GSA’s E&I Committee, we recently invited our first cohort of Presidential Members, most of whom will be linked up with the Early Career Leadership Program. The goal is to wholeheartedly welcome and provide career support for junior scientists from historically excluded backgrounds. From grappling with the history of eugenics in our field to the challenges minoritized scientists face at all levels of the academic hierarchy, we have our work cut out for us. I would be very excited to help implement and support similar membership efforts at SSE.

    Why am I so passionate about inclusion? I was the first out LGBTQIA+ tenured faculty member in my department at the University of Arizona and the same is true in my home department at the University of California, Berkeley. This may be a little surprising to you—but it isn’t to me. The data show that LGBTQIA+ drop out of STEM majors at higher rates while undergrads. The reasons are manifold, but role modeling is known to help these scientists stay the course. Academia has given me an amazing life. I share here details of my journey simply to provide hope for those who might be able to relate to some aspects of it. It isn't necessarily fun to talk about some of these things. But role models were very important to me as a budding scientist. We need more of them. And if elected to the SSE Council, I hope to continue to be a role model for LGBTQIA+ and first-generation scientists in our community.

    Back to top

     

     
    Christopher N. Balakrishnan, Department of Biology, East Carolina University

    View CV

    I am honored to have been nominated for the Council of the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE). I have been a member of the SSE since graduate school and the society has been central to my development as a scientist. At the same time, early in my career I found academic societies difficult to navigate, with somewhat cryptic inner-workings. With this perspective, as a council member I would look forward to cultivating an SSE that continues to support and welcome the next generation of evolutionary biologists.

    The covid19 pandemic has caused massive global suffering and the full scope of the impacts won’t be known for some time. The pandemic has, however, uniquely placed evolutionary biology in the public eye. Throughout my career I have sought to improve the public understanding of evolution and science more broadly. As a member of SSE Council I would strive to develop new ways for the society to connect with the public and to amplify the benefits of a robust public understanding of evolutionary biology. As a graduate student, I founded Nerd Nite, now an international series of light-hearted and somewhat irreverent lectures on science and other topics. While I recognize the limitations of Nerd Nite (and other similar events) in terms of the types of audiences they reach, I place an emphasis on thinking creatively about how we can remove barriers to public engagement with evolutionary science.

    Over the last two years I have served the evolutionary biology community as a Program Officer at the National Science Foundation. In this position I have had the opportunity to think deeply about the challenges and opportunities for our discipline. During a time of reckoning for the academic community and society at large, it has been inspiring to try to develop new programs to foster a more equitable evolutionary biology and think about how our science can engage a broader community. I have served on Diversity & Inclusion committees at the NSF, my home institution, East Carolina University, and my other primary academic society, the American Ornithological Society. I’d look forward to bringing this experience with me to the council of the SSE.

    Back to top

     

     
    Regina S. Baucom, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of Michigan

    View CV

    I am honored to be nominated for the Society for the Study of Evolution council. I am a long time member of SSE and am deeply appreciative of the role that the society has played during the development of my career as well as the cornerstone role the society plays in the promotion and support of evolutionary research more broadly. The Society for the Study of Evolution has long supported fantastic evolutionary biologists across a variety of subdisciplines, and I am excited by the prospect of serving this community.

    The support and promotion of evolutionary biology during extraordinary times. The covid19 pandemic has dealt unparalleled stress to researchers of every career stage but especially to junior scientists. As a community we have experienced dramatic reductions in access to our study sites, our labs, and in the very important day-to-day interactions with other scientists and students. The last year was marked by loss, stress, political strife in the US, and clear and horrible examples of the outright racism that Black and Brown scientists endure. As a community we will need to think very strategically on how best to support scientists that have been especially impacted by the pandemic and social inequities. I am particularly interested in developing mechanisms that will act to retain women in the field who may have shouldered additional care responsibilities in the last year, and scientists from minority backgrounds who may have experienced great losses and extreme stress from pandemic-related events. I am also deeply concerned about the effect that a lack of early formative research experiences may have on undergraduates, especially those from PUIs. As a council member I will think very carefully about how to maintain and promote the study of evolution for everyone while also working to provide access and support for researchers most affected by covid19.

    Every stress and problem, however, presents opportunity. The covid19 pandemic provides a highly relevant axis upon which evolutionary biologists can communicate and promote the study of evolution. Whereas the acceptance of evolution by the public is crucial for basic scientific literacy, the recent pandemic provides evolutionary biologists a vehicle through which we can promote our science more generally. As a council member I will support outreach to the public as well as primary and secondary school systems on general evolutionary themes but likewise see a unique role that the society can play in communicating evolutionary science specific to the pandemic.

    Promoting equity, inclusion, and justice in the society. SSE has responded in a remarkable way in recent years in efforts to promote and retain scientists from diverse backgrounds. The society enacted initiatives aimed to make meetings a safe place for everyone, and in the last year has made important initial steps to recognize how the historical support of eugenics among notable evolutionary biologists affects who feels welcome in the community. There is still much work to be done, especially with regards to attracting and retaining Black and Brown scientists, supporting members from the global south, and in engineering a climate that feels supportive, welcoming, and comfortable for POC, LGBTQIA, and disabled scientists. As a council member I will center BIPOC voices while continuing to push the evolution community to address structural and societal barriers that influence who enters the field, and additionally who feels most supported and appreciated.

    I bring a strong record of society service and past initiatives that have helped to shift the evolution community into a more diverse, just, inclusive, and equitable society. I am the co-creator and maintainer of DiversifyEEB, which is a public list highlighting ecologists and evolutionary biologists who are women and/or underrepresented minorities. The list, begun by myself and Meghan Duffy in 2014, is used by symposium organizers, award and search committees, among others, to identify ecologists and evolutionary biologists who might diversify their candidate pools. Notably, the list was previously used to diversify the pool of associate editors serving the Evolution journal. Additionally, I served as the first chair of the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion committee for the American Society of Naturalists in 2018/2019, and served in the capacity of a committee member from 2019-2021. During this time, I helped develop Safe Evolution (including the meeting Code of Conduct) for the tri-societies (SSE, SSB, ASN), to ensure our meetings are a welcoming and safe atmosphere for all attendees. I also played a key role in bringing the Story Collider to the meetings, and additionally proposed the idea for a society diversity, equity, and inclusion award, which developed into the tri-society IDEA (Inclusiveness, Diversity, Equity, Access) award. I am currently a council member for the American Genetics Association and in this capacity have served on the bylaws committee as well as chair for the EECG Research Awards committee, which are research funds awarded to graduate students and postdocs.

    As a long-time member of the Society for the Study of Evolution, I would be thrilled to serve on council and in so doing would focus on ways to strengthen and maintain the study of evolution, especially in the context of current and future stresses stemming from the covid19 pandemic. Thank you for your consideration.

    Back to top

     

     
    Daniel I. Bolnick, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut

    View CV

    The Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) plays an essential role in facilitating scientific research, inclusive education and career building, and public outreach. I am eager for the chance to serve the society, and the diverse community that it represents, in facilitating these goals. Below, I outline some ideas for how I might serve these goals, and my qualifications for the position.

    Promoting research. The SSE already plays key roles in promoting innovative research. The society advocates for federal funding of evolution, and provides its own grants to support early-career scientists (graduate students). It creates spaces for scientists to disseminate their findings at the annual conferences, and through publication in Evolution and affiliated journals. Maintaining these excellent services is a core function of the society. However, there is always room for improvement:

    Research ethics training is often left to individual faculty, and often missing from undergraduate and graduate curricula. Some recent high-profile cases of research misconduct in data collection, data archiving, and publishing have highlighted the grave consequences of ethical lapses for the community as a whole. The society, as both a funder and publisher of research, has the opportunity to take a leading role in promoting more extensive and effective education about research ethics. If I were elected to the council, I would make it my priority to establish a program to promote training in research ethics in organismal biology, through conference events or virtual classes made available globally.

    Research funding is perpetually a limiting resource, especially after the elimination of the NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants (DDIG). I would like to serve as an advocate to the NSF for either restoration of the DDIG, or creative alternative strategies to fill that vital means of supporting graduate student innovation. Increased research funding and salary for undergraduates is also a key to drawing a diverse pool of students into evolutionary science.

    Inclusive education and career building. The field of evolutionary biology has a grim history, with its deep connections to eugenics and biological racism. The SSE has made great strides in recent years to counter this legacy, including concrete steps to make its conferences safer and more welcoming (e.g., training of EvoAllies, a role I’ve served at each Evolution and ASN conference since the program began), the outstanding Story Collider series at the meetings, and mentoring programs for minority students at the meetings. There are many paths the society can take to move further in these directions.

    One that I am especially passionate about, is making the annual conferences more accessible to a broader array of participants. These meetings are a crucial venue for networking for jobs, and learning about cutting-edge intellectual trends in the field. But, many researchers are cut out of participating due to the cost of attendance, compounded by geographical distance. This exclusion is most severe for individuals with limited funding for travel, or family obligations, who are most likely to be from historically excluded groups or nations. To be inclusive, we need to be creative about rethinking conferences using the lessons learned from the COVID pandemic, to create hybrid models that offer both irreplaceable in-person interactions, and the opportunity for non-attendees to still participate.

    Another goal is to use conferences and society-sponsored workshops to promote a more expansive vision of the range of career trajectories. We are a predominantly academic society attended mostly by students and university faculty. Yet, evolutionary biology touches on many applied topics ranging from agriculture to medicine to conservation. Without losing sight of our core goal of research advances, we can do a better job of encouraging a wider array of career paths at our conferences and helping our members learn about and pursue those paths.

    Public outreach. Anti-science sentiment is widespread today, and presents a major barrier to sound public policy to deal with many crises that we face today, whether climate change or emerging infectious diseases. Evolution has long been a target of anti-science activists, and our collective experience and lessons learned from this history can be applied to more effectively address anti-science sentiment more broadly. It is crucial that SSE and the individual scientists it represents take a strong stance in advocating for better science education from grade-school through college, and public outreach through media and entertainment. We must engage with influencers and policy makers to address misconceptions, allay concerns, and promote understanding and appreciation of the value of science broadly. Doing this effectively means thinking beyond the bounds of evolutionary biology alone, and establishing collaborative programs with other scientific disciplines facing related challenges.

    I first joined the SSE shortly after graduating from college, while I was an education volunteer for the US Peace Corps in Tanzania (1996-98). While there I read every issue of Evolution that made its way to my mailbox, cover to cover. I’ve been a member ever since, and became a prepaid lifetime member about five years ago. I’ve published more articles in Evolution than any other journal (yes, much more even than The American Naturalist). But although I’ve been a devoted member of the society, I’ve devoted far more service to The American Society of Naturalists over the years. I’ve served SSE as an Associate Editor briefly (pausing to serve as Editor of The American Naturalist), and have been trained and served as an EvoAlly at the Evolution meetings. In contrast, I’ve served the ASN extensively as Associate Editor from 2008-2018, Secretary from 2010-2012, Past secretary from 2013-2015, organizer of the first ASN Asilomar meeting in 2014, and Editor-In-Chief from 2018-2022. This service to ASN has frequently brought me into contact with both the SSE council and Evolution’s editorial board, at joint council meetings and other events almost every year for over a decade. But until now I’ve been there to represent ASN. As my term as Editor of The American Naturalist winds down, I am eager to have the opportunity to serve the SSE.

    Back to top

     

     
    Angélica Cibrián-Jaramillo, Ecological and Evolutionary Biology Lab, LANGEBIO, CINVESTAV, Mexico

    View CV

    I felt greatly honored when I received the invitation to participate as a candidate for the
    Council of the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE). I was also immediately reminded of the strength and solidarity of the SSE academic community. Even in one of the most complicated and challenging years of our generation, the SSE moves forward despite a pandemic, and continues to strengthen the academic community interested in advancing evolutionary studies. As an evolutionary biologist by training and by self-recognition, I am thrilled for the possibility of contributing to advance knowledge in evolution-related research via my Council duties. There is no doubt that the SSE has an exceptional history in this effort. It provides support to scientists in their early formative years as PhD candidates and throughout their trajectory, including early-career scientists. The various awards given by the SSE have significant and positive impact in the trajectories of evolution scholars worldwide and are recognized by all of us even as early and wide-eyed graduate students, as greatly important. As an early scholar (Fulbright and others) from my native Mexico to conduct evolutionary studies at Columbia University, I know that support during graduate school can go a long way.

    If elected as a member of the Council, I would support the SSE in favoring education and training that provide early exposure to on-the-ground fieldwork, and hands-on laboratory and bioinformatic work. Early exposure at the undergraduate level and as early as middle school, is critical to build a scientific mind frame and facilitate a deeper understanding of the methods that are used in evolutionary research studies. This is even more important in marginalized academic environments. I have trained and graduated Master and PhD students, and undergrads and high-school students that earned nationallevel recognition in the US.

    In terms of early training, in Mexico I headed an effort to incorporate middle school teenagers in understanding how the scientific method is carried out by organizing a lab-based experience. followed by the review process of scientific papers in evolutionary topics that were submitted by established Mexican scientists. The collection of reviewed papers was later published as a special issue in an international journal and kids were able to see their effort in contributing to evolutionary studies. As part of the Tiny-Earth project in the US, and other smaller efforts to incorporate scientific and evolutionary thinking in youth that I participate in, I have learned that a fun, cooperative, hands-on experience is perhaps the best conduit to advance scientific learning over time, and would bring that in my duties in the Council.

    In terms of promoting diversity, I would build from my own experience as a Latin- American woman of color who carried out her own research in a welcoming multicultural environment while based in the US. I will promote and advocate for mechanisms that recognize and support bright enthusiastic scholars of diverse backgrounds and institutions. Embedded in each person’s own language and culture is a different and complementary interpretation of nature. A community with a diverse cultural background will therefore result in multiple views of the evolutionary history of organisms and the phenomena that leads to that history. This can only lead to novel scientific discoveries that cannot take place in the absence of diversity. In return, underrepresented peoples’ scientific trajectories can change significantly with the support of, and inclusion in, a research community like the one in SSE. I am grateful to SSE for inviting me to participate as a candidate for the Council, adding to an already diverse society.

    I am passionate about changing academia to eliminate and prevent gender violence. I am currently working with an international group of researchers (led by Mandë Holford, CUNY-NYC) to promote and protect women and minorities in STEM. I have begun working on raising awareness in all members of our academic community in my home institution of the great loss to all, when women are marginalized, excluded, or suffer violence within academia. I would hope to continue to promote safe academic spaces for women and change negative gender roles, as a member of the Council.

    The recurrent challenge for us evolutionary biologists is that of transmitting the value of evolutionary thinking to society. The COVID19 pandemic has brought evolutionary thought and tools forward into the public light, in particular the relevance of molecular biology and genomics of the Sars-Cov2 virus. Today we have a very interesting and powerful window of opportunity as the conversations about the evolution of genomic variants in a virus leave the halls of academia and enter people’s homes. In 2020, I placed most of my research lines on hold and devoted the entire year to describe the evolutionary genomics of Sars-Cov2 in Mexico to my peers, friends, and neighbors. I had a first-hand experience of emergency outreach of evolution via social media, in seminars, and in person. With more time and planning through the SSE, such efforts jointly with the SSE experience, can become an important component of outreach for evolutionary thinking.

    My current and previous professional services in collection-based institutions focused on research and outreach, and my experience coordinating various interdisciplinary international consortia. My work during a decade based in Mexico, and now temporarily based in the Netherlands, have given me enough skills and insight to be able to conduct my duties as a member of the Council Class and service our Society.

    I thank you in advance for your consideration, and I would be happy to answer any additional questions or doubts that you may have.

    Back to top

     


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Caiti in a dark blue button up and gray sweater smiling at the cameraCaiti Smukowski Heil
    she/her/hers
    Assistant Professor
    Biological Sciences
    North Carolina State University
    www.heillab.com
    Twitter: @caitismuheil
    Start date: March 2019

    PhD: Duke University; Advisor: Mohamed Noor.
    Postdoc: University of Washington; Advisor: Maitreya Dunham.

    About the department:

    NC State is a land grant institution with a really strong history of basic and applied research in quantitative genetics. We're in the heart of Raleigh, but I pass by a field full of NC State cows on my way to work every morning. We even have our own creamery that makes delicious ice cream!

    About the research:

    My lab studies processes that create and maintain variation in populations using genetics, genomics, and experimental evolution in Saccharomyces yeast. The two main areas we are focused on right now are 1) how recombination rate varies between populations, and 2) how hybridization can aid populations in adaptation to different environments. We are also involved in some fun collaborative projects baking and brewing with Saccharomyces and other wild yeasts.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    I started my lab right after my second son was born, and then 1 year in, COVID happened. So both of those things have been challenging to navigate. A more standard but very true challenge: prioritization of various activities (grant writing, mentoring, teaching, admin, project management, etc).

    How have you prepared to be a PI?

    I think one of the most common things I've heard about becoming a new PI is that our traditional PhD/postdoc training does not encompass many of the skills needed to navigate PI life. I do find this to be true in several ways, particularly regarding finances and management. However, I was particularly fortunate to have amazing mentors for my PhD and postdoc, and I learned so much from them (and continue to learn from them). And of course one of the first things I did when I was sitting alone in my new empty office was to read Mohamed's book, "You're Hired! Now What?"

    Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

    I once drove a stick-shift (without knowing how) through the countryside of Vermont in the middle of the night after a wedding to catch an early flight from Boston to the Snowbird meeting. It was worth it!

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    I attended my first Evolution Meeting as a 2nd year grad student in 2011 in Norman, OK. After my talk, Bret Payseur sat down and chatted with me for half an hour about my research. I'll always remember the time Bret and many others spent talking with me at that conference. I was young and new to the field, but it really made me feel a part of the community. I've always loved that the Evolution meetings are trainee focused, and they are my favorite meeting to attend every year. I can't wait until I can see everyone again in person!

    Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

    I teach undergraduate Population & Quantitative Genetics. We read the Weber et al. 2013 paper about QTL mapping of mouse burrowing behavior, and it totally blows the students' minds that complex behavior can have a fairly simple genetic basis. On a more serious note, I teach a class on Eugenics, and I think it is probably the class that my students remember the most. Most people are completely unaware of the role that American scientists played in advancing eugenics, and that Eugenics Boards were operating across the country until quite recently (the North Carolina Eugenics Board disbanded in 1974).

    Do you have a time management tip to share?

    I need time management tips! But one thing that has been instrumental for me is a writing group with a couple of my friend/colleagues that meets weekly. It has held me accountable to writing, and more importantly, has offered a critical support system.

    What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

    This isn't an evolutionary biology book per se, but you should read Prodigal Summer by Barbara Kingsolver!

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    I think one of the hardest things about grad school is that your time is often fairly unstructured. I found it really helpful to create my own schedule each week, with daily tasks/goals that I needed to accomplish. Second - meet/establish relationships with seminar speakers, other faculty in your department, your committee members, etc. I did this less than I should have because I was intimidated/shy, but it can really help you scientifically and personally. Finally, celebrate your victories big and small!

    Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

    When I was in graduate school, I was genotyping a Drosophila cross using microsatellite markers. I was getting really weird results, and I realized that my fly stocks had gotten contaminated (two different lines had been collapsed into one). It was about 6 months of work that I had to discard. I cried. I drew a picture of a gravestone in my lab notebook. I went out to dinner with a friend (Hi Cathy Rushworth!). Then I set everything back up and redid the project.

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    I have two boys (ages 2 and 4) who have an endless amount of energy. We spend a lot of time walking in the woods and throwing things in streams/puddles/lakes/ponds/gutters. When I can escape them, I like to run and listen to podcasts.


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    a petri dish with a bacteria drawing of person from the shoulders up holding a bubbling can labeled Best Buds

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Caiti smiling at the camera with a lab bench in the background

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Caiti wearing a pink shirt, green vest and sunglasses, looking shocked and excited with a giant tortoise in the background


    View full page

    Each month, the Evolution Highlights series will highlight some of the interesting and varied papers published within the last few years in Evolution. The goal of these Evolution Highlights is to let our readers learn more about how the highlighted study came into existence, and to invite the authors to share stories and tips from the perspective of a recently published author. We welcome nominations and self-nominations for the Evolution Highlights. Find out how to submit a paper here.

    The words Evolution Highlight in white on a yellow box above the paper title and author list in white on a dark blue background showing digital drawings of spherical viruses

    "Virulence-driven trade offs in disease transmission: A meta-analysis"
    Acevedo, M. A., Dillemuth, F. P., Flick, A. J., Faldyn, M. J., & Elderd, B. D. (2019). Virulence‐driven trade‐offs in disease transmission: A meta‐analysis. Evolution, 73(4), 636-647.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/evo.13692

    Abstract:
    The virulence–transmission trade-off hypothesis proposed more than 30 years ago is the cornerstone in the study of host–parasite co-evolution. This hypothesis rests on the premise that virulence is an unavoidable and increasing cost because the parasite uses host resources to replicate. This cost associated with replication ultimately results in a deceleration in transmission rate because increasing within-host replication increases host mortality. Empirical tests of predictions of the hypothesis have found mixed support, which cast doubt about its overall generalizability. To quantitatively address this issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of 29 empirical studies, after reviewing over 6000 published papers, addressing the four core relationships between (1) virulence and recovery rate, (2) within-host replication rate and virulence, (3) within-host replication and transmission rate, and (4) virulence and transmission rate. We found strong support for an increasing relationship between replication and virulence, and replication and transmission. Yet, it is still uncertain if these relationships generally decelerate due to high within-study variability. There was insufficient data to quantitatively test the other two core relationships predicted by the theory. Overall, the results suggest that the current empirical evidence provides partial support for the trade-off hypothesis, but more work remains to be done.

    Evolution Highlight by Miguel Acevedo
    Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida

    What gave you the idea for this study?

    Questions about virulence—the negative consequences a parasite has on individual fitnesscould be traced back to Pasteur’s experiments in the 19th century showing that virulence is not a fixed trait. But maybe it was the theoretical formulations of Anderson and May in the ’80s that sparked the interest of the community. Multiple studies have studied virulence in the context of the transmission-virulence trade-off. With some studies finding support and others not, there was no consensus. So, we decided to tackle the problem using a meta-analysis approach.

    What was the big question you were trying to ask and why was it exciting?

    Overall, we were interested in answering the question: Is there enough evidence to generalize predictions from the transmission-virulence trade-off hypothesis? The theoretical predictions from Anderson and May’s model are central to disease ecology and evolution. Finding overwhelming empirical support would suggest that the theory is general and robust. If not, it may suggest that the theory needs to be re-evaluated. Alternatively, if we found that there were not enough studies to conclude, we could guide future studies to address key knowledge gaps.

    In what ways does this study expand or build on your previous studies?

    Well, in a way we could say that this study is literally made from previous studies! :) It is a meta-analysis which means that we re-analyzed data from previous studies to test for generalizable patterns.

    From your perspective, what was the most interesting or intriguing aspect of this study?

    By searching from thousands of papers we got a pretty good perspective on the dramatic divorce between theoretical and empirical studies. The theory advanced way faster.

    Were there any unexpected logistical or technical challenges you had to address?

    It was a meta-analysis, so I’ll guess the answer is yes! First, we analyze together data from studies that were not initially designed to be analyzed in that way. Second, the trade-off hypothesis predicts that the relationship between transmission and virulence “decelerates” with increasing virulence. But, what kind of functional relationship is expected to decelerate? Third, the inclusion criteria were difficult to automate so our team had to patiently screen manually thousands of papers.

    Did your work take you to any interesting locations? If so, what were they like?

    Unfortunately, since it was a meta-analysis the study was conducted pretty much on a computer. But I got to work in pretty good coffee shops. :)

    Did you have to learn any new analytical techniques for this study?

    A big challenge of our study was how to consistently test for a “deceleration” in the relationship between transmission and virulence in different studies. As a team, we discussed multiple approaches. But it turned out to be difficult to do it extracting effect sizes directly from studies. Finally, we decided on an “individual-patient data” approach because it allowed us to re-analyze the data from all studies in a consistent way. Interestingly, there were less than a handful of studies designed this way in ecology and evolution.

    What was your writing process like?

    That’s a great question. Right before writing this paper, I finished reading “Writing Science” by J. Schimel. In a way, this was my first real-life practice applying some of the tricks I learned from the book.

    We started with the figures and the results, then the methods, then the discussion and constructed the introduction right at the end. This really helped us craft a concise story with all the details needed to understand and replicate it, but not more.

    What was the biggest challenge about writing the manuscript?

    There have been some previous great reviews on the trade-off hypothesis, so we didn’t want to replicate that. Therefore, we had to balance providing enough context for the reader to understand the background and the need for the study without necessarily doing an extensive review of the topic.

    Was this study collaborative with other groups? If so, what was valuable about that experience?

    This was a whole lab effort. It was a great honor to collaborate with such a great group of scientists. Now remembering how this study was conceived made me realized that everybody now has moved on to do big and better things, and how I miss everybody.

    How would you explain your study to a five-year-old?

    Diseases make people sick. But some diseases make you sicker than others. They get passed from person to person and some think that some of the diseases that get passed more than others can make you sicker. We studied that and found that…for the most part…we still don’t know :)

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Two men standing on either side of a poster in a conference hall. The men are smiling at the camera and wearing name tags.


    View full page

    Each month, the Evolution Highlights series will highlight some of the interesting and varied papers published within the last few years in Evolution. The goal of these Evolution Highlights is to let our readers learn more about how the highlighted study came into existence, and to invite the authors to share stories and tips from the perspective of a recently published author. We welcome nominations and self-nominations for the Evolution Highlights. Find out how to submit a paper here.

    The words Evolution Highlight in a yellow box over the paper tilte and author list in white text on top of a photo of a fruit fly on a leaf

    "Quantifying the relative contributions of the X chromosome, autosomes, and mitochondrial genome to local adaptation"
    Lasne, C., Van Heerwaarden, B., Sgrò, C.M. and Connallon, T. (2019), Quantifying the relative contributions of the X chromosome, autosomes, and mitochondrial genome to local adaptation*. Evolution, 73: 262-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13647
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/evo.13647

    Abstract:
    During local adaptation with gene flow, some regions of the genome are inherently more responsive to selection than others. Recent theory predicts that X-linked genes should disproportionately contribute to local adaptation relative to other genomic regions, yet this prediction remains to be tested. We carried out a multigeneration crossing scheme, using two cline-end populations of Drosophila melanogaster to estimate the relative contributions of the X chromosome, autosomes, and mitochondrial genome to divergence in four traits involved in local adaptation (wing size, resistance to heat, desiccation, and starvation stresses). We found that the mitochondrial genome and autosomes contributed significantly to clinal divergence in three of the four traits. In contrast, the X made no significant contribution to divergence in these traits. Given the small size of the mitochondrial genome, our results indicate that it plays a surprisingly large role in clinal adaptation. In contrast, the X, which represents roughly 20% of the Drosophila genome, contributes negligibly—a pattern that conflicts with theoretical predictions. These patterns reinforce recent work implying a central role of mitochondria in climatic adaptation, and suggest that different genomic regions may play fundamentally different roles in processes of divergence with gene flow.

    Evolution Highlight by Clementine Lasne
    Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Institute of Science and Technology Austria

    What gave you the idea for this study?

    My PhD advisors and I had just developed and published a new theoretical study in which we predicted that—under many different scenarios of gene flow, selection and genetic dominance—local adaptation should be facilitated when the allele(s) under selection are X-linked rather than autosomal.

    What was the big question you were trying to ask and why was it exciting?

    The big question was whether the X-chromosome did indeed make a larger contribution to local adaptation than the autosomes, as predicted by our new theory. I do not know if there is anything more exciting for a PhD student (or biologist, in general) than the feeling of satisfaction and achievement one gets from empirically testing his/her own theoretical model.

    From your perspective, what was the most interesting or intriguing aspect of this study?

    The most intriguing aspect of the study was the unexpected results! The X chromosome failed to play a disproportionately large role in the evolution of local adaptation for any of the traits we examined. Instead, the mitochondrial genome became the (unexpected) star of the show. Once the disappointment of not empirically verifying our theoretical predictions had passed, we revisited our theory to include the mitochondrial genome and found that our results made sense. This was the most interesting part of the study.

    Were there any unexpected logistical or technical challenges you had to address?

    Although not technical per se, the biggest challenge of this study was obtaining a large enough sample size to determine with certainty whether or not there was a large X-effect in local adaptation. While morphological traits such as wing size did not require particularly large sample sizes, the stress resistance traits we used are physiological traits that are typically quite “noisy” and difficult to measure. We therefore did a power analysis, guided by data that I had previously collected from these populations and published, and settled on sample sizes that would give us reasonable power to test our hypotheses.

    Did your work take you to any interesting locations? If so, what were they like?

    The two populations of Drosophila melanogaster used for this study were in fact part of a large field collection during which a colleague and I drove from Melbourne to Cairns (3000km along the east coast of Australia!), with regular stops to collect populations of Drosophila along the way. This is no secret to Drosophila biologists, but the best places to find large numbers of Drosophila are wineries!

    Did you have to learn any new analytical techniques for this study?

    Most of the analytical techniques were new to me. But I particularly enjoyed learning to calculate the confidence intervals around the chromosomal contribution indices using simulated random draws, and the line-cross analysis technique used to assess the importance of additive from non-additive effects on the traits we examined.

    What was the most challenging part of analyzing your data?

    Making peace with the fact we were not finding any large-X effects...

    How did writing up this study compare to previous paper writing experiences?

    This study was the third and last chapter of my PhD thesis. With the valuable experience of two previous publications, as well as the motivation of testing my theoretical predictions, the writing of this paper was mostly pleasant. It was definitely a lot easier than writing the theory manuscript, which was my first publication ever (and is now the study I am the proudest of).

    What was the review / revision process like?

    The review process went smoothly. My co-authors and I were pleased by the positive feedback we received from reviewers, and their useful suggestions for how we could improve the paper. Then I remember immediately thinking “don’t get used to this!”.

    Do you have any writing tips for others?

    More experienced scientists would probably have very valuable tips on books to read to improve your grammar, but here are the things that were most useful to me, as a young and unexperienced writer. Firstly, don’t let your impostor syndrome take over your writing. Start by clearly writing on top of the page the research question and your hypothesis. Then do an outline of each section of the manuscript (bullet points will do). Get feedback on this outline from your supervisors before writing the paragraphs. Finally, do yourself a favor by including references to the literature as you write. There is nothing more frustrating than spending hours searching for the one statement you clearly remember reading a few days ago but cannot remember where!

    What do you think will be the lasting impact of this study?

    There is still a lot to learn about the genetic basis of adaptation to a changing environment. The approach we proposed in this study could very well be applied to other species exhibiting wide geographic distributions and divergence for ecologically important traits. Our approach could also be used to explore the genetic basis of population divergence in projects involving experimental evolution.


     
     

     
      
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    Heat resistance assay set-up
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Kathleen Grogan smiling at the camera in a black shirtKathleen (Katie) Grogan
    she/her
    Assistant Professor
    Departments of Anthropology & Biological Sciences
    University of Cincinnati
    https://sites.google.com/site/kathleengroganphd/home
    Twitter: ;@Dr_KatieG1
    Start date: August, 2020

    PhD: Duke University; Advisor: Christine M. Drea.
    Postdoc: Emory University; Advisor: Donna L. Maney. Postdoc at Pennsylvania State University, Postdoc Advisory: George (PJ) H Perry.

    About the department:

    The University of Cincinnati is the oldest higher ed institution in the area and the second largest university in Ohio. It's an R1 public research university located in the heart of downtown Cincinnati, right next to the Cincinnati Zoo. As an interdisciplinary member of both the Anthropology and Biological Sciences Departments, I get to interact with an extremely broad range of research expertise and teach across disciplines.

    About the research:

    My lab investigates the impact of genetic and epigenetic variation on differences in fitness across environmental conditions. With the effects of human-induced climate change becoming more pronounced, research at the intersection of the environmental change, evolutionary genomics, and individual fitness is critical to our ability to conserve biodiversity and understand humanity’s ability to adapt to climate change. By using human and non-human primate models, our work has direct applications to both human health research and conservation work. To ask these questions, we integrate anthropological genomics, evolutionary biology, and biomedicine, and apply our findings widely, from the conservation of endangered species to improving human health. I am currently developing projects to examine how long-term environmental change has affected human hunter-gatherers in Southwest Uganda and how short-term environmental variation affects wild ring-tailed lemurs in Southwest Madagascar.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    Honestly, the pandemic has been really difficult. Most of my research program is field-based and we simply aren't able to travel internationally right now. Luckily it's given me a chance to write up a lot of old work and jump into grant writing.

    How do you/will you approach mentoring new lab members?

    Mentoring my lab is extremely important to me, which is why last summer I took the time to develop a lab Code of Conduct and a Mentor-Mentee Agreement for my laboratory, which are posted on my website.

    When and why did you become a SSE member?

    I've been a member of SSE since the end of my PhD in 2014.

    What does becoming a SSE member mean to you or your career?

    Being a member of SSE has meant that I have the opportunity to expand my research horizons and also bring more non-human primate research into evolutionary biology. Traditionally, primates haven't been included, but as technologies get cheaper, primates offer some very unique and exciting opportunities to study evolutionary biology.

    Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

    I teach the concept of evolution in every one of my classes, although I haven't taught a class on evolution yet. I find evolution itself and the mechanisms the hardest to teach, which is why some colleagues and I actually write a manuscript a few years ago on an activity using Post-its to teach evolution.

    Do you have a time management tip to share?

    Do your planning for next week on Friday afternoon. That way when you come into the office on Monday, you know exactly what you should be doing.

    What is your favorite app?

    KanBanFlow and Toggl. I would be lost without them.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Stop treating graduate school as a 'temporary few years of over-working, after which you will start having freetime'. It's your life. Start living it now. If you over-work for the 4-7 years of your PhD (or postdoc), it will be extremely hard to break that habit as a new PI. The work will still be there for you on Monday morning or after your vacation.

    Did you ever have something go wrong in a talk?

    Hasn't everyone? The most stressful one however, was having my very old laptop crash right before 3 different faculty interview job talks. Fortunately, I had loaded the talk onto Google Drive, my email, and a thumbdrive and was able to use the computer in the room.

    Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

    Ha. Only ever other week. You recover by acknowledging that science is rarely perfect, everyone makes mistakes, and that a mistake is rarely the end of the world.

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    I run with my dogs, hike with friends, and cook. I also devour fiction novels.


     
     
     
     
     
     a ring-tailed lemur sitting in a tree looking at the camera


     


     
     
     
     
     

     Katie Grogan in a black t-shirt and jeans crouching in the forest next to three ring-tailed lemurs


     
     
     
     
     
     


    Katie Grogan presenting a poster titled Rainforest Hunter-Gatherer Evolutionary Genomics


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    MEgan in a gray sweater smiling at the cameraMegan DeMarche
    she/her
    Assistant Professor
    Plant Biology
    University of Georgia
    http://demarchelab.weebly.com/
    Twitter: ;@MeganDemarche
    Start date: January 2020

    PhD: University of California Santa Cruz; Advisor: Kathleen Kay.
    Postdoc: University of Colorado Boulder; Advisor: Dan Doak.

    About the department:

    Our department is organized taxonomically (plant biology), so our faculty come from a wide range of disciplines and perspectives but we’re all plant nerds at heart! At the same time, there’s an incredible community of ecologists and evolutionary biologists across departments at UGA, and this has led to a really collaborative environment with lots of interdepartmental interaction.

    About the research:

    My lab studies the ecology and evolution of wild plant populations, with an emphasis on responses to global change. We’re particularly interested in how plants respond to environmental change in space and time, including local population dynamics, species’ range shifts, and the interactions between climate change and other drivers such as biotic effects or fragmentation. Projects in the lab often use a combination of field and greenhouse experiments, long-term observational data, and demographic models to parse the patterns and drivers of individual fitness, population persistence, and geographic distributions.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    Far and away the biggest challenge has been starting a new lab in the middle of a pandemic. I started my position just a few months before the university closed due to COVID-19, and learning how to navigate a new university system, teaching, ordering equipment, planning research, and recruiting was incredibly difficult with the uncertainty and shifting landscape of the pandemic. Luckily, I had some great colleagues and department staff who helped me through the process!!

    What has been the biggest surprise so far about being a new PI?

    The biggest surprise has been simply understanding what the job of a PI really is. Before I started, I talked to a lot of people and so I had some expectation of the challenges around time management, advising, and project administration. But on some level, I still expected to work more or less how I had as a grad student and postdoc, albeit busier. However, I quickly found that my previous work strategies weren't nearly as effective in my new role. Instead of being able to focus on completing a big task from start to finish (e.g., analyze a dataset or write the first draft of a paper), I found myself trying to do the hundred little daily things needed to keep an entire lab functional and productive. It's taken me some time to recognize that my job is no longer "scientist" (something I'd just started to figure out how to do!), but instead "manager of a group of scientists", and that takes an entirely different set of skills.

    Do you have a funny story to share from an Evolution Meeting?

    I remember one afternoon at the 2014 meeting in Raleigh. I'd come back after a break and noticed that the building was almost empty. I was thinking, "Where is everybody?" Turns out the US team was playing in the soccer world cup, and everyone was taking an extended lunch in the surrounding sports bars and pubs to watch the game. I'd never followed sports all that closely, but had a great time talking science and soccer that afternoon.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    My first meeting was in 2013 in Snowbird, Utah. It was my first major conference and my first talk, and I was feeling pretty nervous and shy in the beginning. I ended up having a great time! I got helpful feedback on my work, made a lot of new friends, and even got to meet a few of my science heroes. It was a really validating experience as a new graduate student, and Evolution is still my favorite conference.

    Do you teach evolution? What is the hardest concept to teach?

    I teach evolution in my introductory biology and grad courses. I think the most difficult concept is also one of the most fundamental -- what do we mean when we talk about fitness? Most of us have some hazy idea of survival and reproduction, but it's difficult and fascinating to delve into the nuance of life history theory, inclusive fitness, density-dependence, selfish genes, etc.

    What is your favorite app?

    It sounds silly, but Scanner Pro was a game-changer for me. I do a lot of backpacking field research trips in remote alpine environments, and I've had clipboards ripped out of my hands by a sudden gust of wind. Being able to quickly combine 3-4 days worth of paper datasheets into a single pdf for temporary backup has saved me a lot of heartache. It sure beats having hundreds of individual pictures of datasheets on my phone!

    What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

    Maybe this is obvious, but of course I have to say "On the Origin of Species". I was lucky enough to have a committee member require that I read it for my comprehensive exams, otherwise I might have gone through my entire PhD without actually reading this classic. I'm continually amazed by how many of the current hot-topics and debates in evolutionary biology are addressed in that book. Is there anything that Darwin didn't think about first?

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Read some actual dissertations! Most beginning graduate students have only read individual papers, and don't have a clear understanding of what a dissertation really looks like. Choose early career biologists you admire and/or have the type of job you want. As you read, think about 1) how they frame their work in terms of inter-related chapters, 2) what alternative approaches they could have used to tackle their questions, and 3) the pros/cons of the approaches they ultimately took. This is really valuable when trying to plan your own dissertation project. It also helps highlight that even rockstar scientists usually have 1-2 "safe" chapters in their dissertation. Remember that you're preparing for an entire research career, and you don't need to definitively answer all the questions you find interesting in your Ph.D.

    What one piece of advice would you give to a postdoc?

    I'll share the most valuable advice I was given, which is to think about the skill set you didn't get from your PhD but that you'll want when building your long-term research program. Then be purposeful in using your postdoc to get those skills. For me, that was demographic modeling!

    How was your first faculty meeting?

    My first faculty meeting was actually part of a job search for another position in the department. It felt surreal to suddenly be on the other side of the curtain!

    Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

    Yes, this one is seared into my memory! After I published one of my PhD chapters involving a demographic model, a colleague reached out to say he was having trouble replicating my results. I dug back into my code and found an error in how I had calculated a vital rate. At the time, I was panicked and I remember asking my advisor if it meant we had to retract the paper. The mistake ended up being minor and didn't affect the overall conclusions, so we issued a correction to update the necessary tables. It was a really valuable learning experience for me. Not only has it made me slightly obsessive about checking my code, it also helped me to understand that scientists are human and the importance of fostering a supportive culture that empowers people to own up to and correct their mistakes.

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    Usually I'm out in the north Georgia woods somewhere!! I love hiking and backpacking, and also do volunteer maintenance for the Appalachian trail. When the weather or mosquitoes drive me inside, I like to read, cook, or hang with my 3 dogs.

     
     
     

      
     
     
     
     

     
      
     
       
     
      

     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     

     
     
     
      
     
       
     
       
     
      

     
     
     


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    Moises with a beard and a gray t-shirt smiling at the camera in front of a blurry leafy green background.Moisés Expósito-Alonso
    he/him
    Staff Associate & Assistant Professor (by courtesy) of Biology
    Plant Biology
    Carnegie Institution for Science
    Stanford University
    moisesexpositoalonso.org
    Twitter: MExpositoAlonso
    Start date: Sep 2019

    PhD: Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen; Advisor: Detlef Weigel.
    Postdoc: University of California Berkeley; Advisor: Rasmus Nielsen.

    About the department:

    My group’s home is the Dept. of Plant Biology and Global Ecology of the Carnegie Institution for Science at Stanford. I am also Assistant Professor (by courtesy) at Stanford’s Biology, where I teach and mentor wonderful PhD students. Carnegie’s mission is to support exceptional ability and passion and give scientists generous financial independence to pursue bold research questions. This allowed me to start my lab just months after finishing my PhD. Our department is well known on campus for its “comunidad”, collaborative nature, and Friday afternoon seminars and garden BBQs!

    About the research:

    My main aim is to understand whether and how plants will evolve to keep pace with climate change. This leads to a number of evolutionary questions: how does natural selection shape genome-wide variation in natural populations, how does it vary across climates, what is its architecture, and what are the limits in adaptation to different climates. We use Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system, as this plant is broadly distributed, shows adaptations in life histories and ecophysiological traits, and as a model system, allows us to work with tools and ideas in evolutionary ecology, quantitative and population genetics, geostatistics, and molecular biology. Our studies often involve computational genomic methods and field experiments under different climates, where we aim to measure the effects of standing variants on fitness traits or study the temporal responses of populations leading to adaptation or demographic extinction.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    Managing time! So far my approach (not sure how successful this is!) is to block one entire day per week just for my own projects, two days for one-on-one meetings with lab members, and two for spontaneous meetings for collaborations, other tasks, talks, etc. (and if possible, delegate administrative work to supporting staff).

    Are you recruiting? If so, how do you/ will you choose new lab members?

    Yes, at all levels! I am building a pretty multidisciplinary lab to tackle evolutionary adaptation of species (or the lack of it) in response to climate change. I aim to find scientists with a deep curiosity for nature, who at the same time are mission-oriented. Whether you are a geneticist, evolutionary biologist, ecologist, or computer scientist, there is a role to play. Every kind of mind and expertise is necessary to address such a huge question.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    My first Evolution meeting was 2016 in Austin — it was probably one of my favourite meetings, and one of the first times that I was exposed to the amazing Evolution-community in North America. Coming from Europe for that event was amazing, and I used the trip to visit wonderful labs in the West coast, where I ended up establishing my own group. This was probably career changing.

    Are you involved in evolution outreach? Tell us about it.

    During COVID I have only managed to do some virtual outreach, joining calls with young students to tell them what it means to be an evolutionary biologist. I especially enjoy when these are in Spanish, as I think language is an important access barrier to STEM for many highschoolers. Now with our lab we are planning several live events, including guided visits to our field station where we are running evolution experiments under different climate simulations.

    What is your favorite app?

    Google Doc + Paperpile combo! There is no other way to write collaborative papers!

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Read, read, read. Our work stands on the shoulders of giants, that is, most of what we build is upon what is known. One of the best ways to begin crafting your dissertation is either identifying a gap of knowledge in the field (or between fields), or identifying long-standing ideas that are unchallenged or have mixed evidence. I think graduate school is a wonderful time when you have a finish line far far down the road, so you can really be curious, explore, and think deeply about the topics that most intrigue you.



     

     
     

     
     
     
     
      
     

     
     
     
     
     
      

     
     
     
     
     
      


    View full page

    This profile is part of a series of New Faculty Profiles that highlight and introduce up-and-coming PIs in SSE. We invite highlighted faculty to discuss their research, describe how SSE has impacted their career, and share any tips or stories they may have for other researchers.

    kara with short dark hair and round glasses smiling at the camera with sand and water in the background.Kara Layton
    she/her
    Lecturer in Marine Biology
    School of Biological Sciences
    University of Aberdeen
    https://www.laytonlab.com/
    Twitter: ;@molluscular
    Start date: April 2020

    MSc: University of Guelph; Advisor Dr. Paul Hebert.
    PhD: University of Western Australia; Advisor: Dr. Nerida Wilson.
    Postdoc: Memorial University of Newfoundland & Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Advisor: Dr. Ian Bradbury. 

    About the department:

    The University of Aberdeen has a vibrant biology department with several recent hires in ecology and evolution along with an outstanding PhD community. We’re located on the North Sea in Scotland, known for its extensive sand dunes and rocky cliffs, and we don’t shy away from a polar dip in the winter!

    About the research:

    Broadly speaking, the goal of my research is to better understand diversity in aquatic ecosystems, with a focus on hyperdiverse marine invertebrates. This involves using field and museum collections, genomic tools and modelling to resolve phylogenetic relationships and population structure, to identify genomic regions of speciation and adaptation, and to make predictions about how biodiversity will respond to climate change in the future. I’m especially interested in the evolution of warning colouration and mimicry in nudibranchs, and the genomic basis of colour more broadly, as well as improving genomic resources for understudied invertebrates.

    What has been the biggest challenge as a new PI so far?

    I don't want to sound like a broken record so I'll keep this short and sweet—juggling a pandemic, trans-Atlantic move, and maternity leave in the first 18 months of my position was quite the challenge!

    How have you prepared to be a PI?

    I was lucky to have independence as a PhD student and postdoc (and even as an MSc student!) and this helped me to think critically and ask interesting questions. When I was transitioning between PhD and postdoc I went to my mentor to ask for advice (having a mentor in the field is incredibly helpful, by the way!) and they described the role of a PI as putting out a series of fires on a daily basis and it being important to know which fires to extinguish first. As simple as this sounds, this was one of the most important pieces of advice I received along the way. This helped me to learn how to prioritise and not to 'sweat the small stuff', so to speak.

    When was your first Evolution Meeting, and how did it affect your career?

    My first Evolution meeting was the joint congress in Montpellier in 2018 and it was instrumental to my career—it's where I met my future postdoc supervisor. It was a great opportunity to discuss my research with such an impressive group of scientists, and the banquet at Abbaye de Valmagne was sensational! I was also particularly grateful to receive travel support from SSE—it otherwise wouldn't have been possible coming from Western Australia.

    Do you teach evolution? What concept blows students’ minds?

    I teach evolutionary concepts as part of my combined undergraduate and master's course in marine biodiversity. Although not a concept per se, I find that students are constantly surprised by how natural history collections serve as such important resources for understanding evolutionary biology. I think more can be done to better communicate their importance to the younger generation.

    Do you have a time management tip to share?

    Two things I try to do: 1) set weekly goals so I can make sure that projects keep ticking along and 2) prioritise properly to avoid spending a disproportionate amount of time on a relatively unimportant task. Do I always take my own advice? Sadly, no.

    What book should every evolutionary biologist read?

    I'm enjoying Extended Heredity at the moment!

    What one piece of advice would you give to a starting graduate student?

    Write often! And don't be afraid to get feedback on an early (and very rough) draft—it may save you a lot of work in the end.

    Do you remember making any mistakes as a trainee; how did you recover?

    Yes. At the beginning of my PhD I received specimens from a museum and I was very eager to get into the lab and start processing them. I didn't check the inventory list well enough and hadn't realised that some specimens were meant for someone else and not for molecular work. Unfortunately, I had already processed them in the lab and there was no tissue remaining. These organisms were incredibly difficult to collect and probably impossible to replace (I'm forever apologising Nerida and Greg). I learned some valuable lessons- don't be hasty and triple check inventory lists.

    What do you enjoy doing in your free time?

    My free time has changed lately since I have a 5-month-old at home. What was hiking, venturing to craft breweries and yoga has transformed into baby massage, swimming lessons, and leisurely strolls (but I'm hoping to get back to those other hobbies in the not-so-distant future).


     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Chromodoris_magnifica, a sea slug with a black and white striped back and yellow border.

     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

     
     
     
     
     
    A person in scuba diving gear swimming through a coral reef.


    View full page

    Mission Statement

    The Society for the Study of Evolution promotes evolutionary biology research, education, application, outreach, and community building in an equitable and globally inclusive manner.

    Vision Statement

    The Society for the Study of Evolution aspires to advance knowledge of evolutionary biology for the benefit of science and society and to cultivate and support a global community of evolutionary biologists.


    View full page

    Circular EELS logo. Text: EELS. Evo English Lanugage Support. The words surround a digital drawing of three eels underwater, poking their heads up out of the sand.

    The Evolution English Language Support (EELS) Program offers free, light touch editing for authors submitting to Evolution for whom English is not their preferred language. 

    Evolution publishes exclusively in English, which can present additional challenges to authors for whom English is an additional language. The EELS Program is intended to help reduce barriers to scientific publishing by providing such authors with an opportunity for additional support.

    There are two ways for authors to participate in the EELS program:

    1. Authors can request language support prior to submitting to Evolution by emailing the EELS Coordinator, Dr. Diogo B. Provete, at eelscoordinator@gmail.com. 
    2. Authors can check a box during the Evolution manuscript submission process if they would be happy to be contacted for language support following review. If language support is recommended by reviewers or editors, the decision email to the authors will include details of how to access language support through the EELS program. 

    In both instances, manuscripts that reach the EELS Coordinator will be assigned to trained EELS Editors, who will have up to two weeks to make light touch edits and converse with the author as needed to improve clarity of the text. Importantly, EELS Editors are not reviewers and will not assess the scientific content  of the manuscripts. 

    This program was conceived by the SSE Diversity Committee and the Evolution Editors, and is based on the Language Editor position at the American Society of Mammalogists. We will assess its effectiveness after a one-year pilot test.

    Additional editing services are available through the Oxford University Press author support services. As part of OUP and Evolution’s commitment to increasing the accessibility of scientific knowledge to the broader global community, authors are also encouraged to provide the title and abstract in one or more alternative languages.

    Learn more about how to submit to Evolution.


    View full page

    Text: Society for the Study of Evolution International Symposia Series, Free virtual events for the global community of Evolutionary Biologists.

    About

    To celebrate the diversity of the international membership and strengthen ties with the global community of evolutionary biologists, the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) is hosting a free virtual series of international symposia in different languages and time zones. These symposia are organized by the SSE Graduate Student Advisory Committee (GSAC) in collaboration with local evolutionary biologists. 

    Each symposium is geared toward an evolutionary biology community in a particular region of the world and features local early career researchers and senior researchers. Talks are presented during local daytime hours in locally used languages with live captioning and translation. Each symposium is followed by a workshop on how to publish in Evolution taught by associate editors from each region.

    Registration is free and open to all. Registrants are not required to be members of SSE. Registrants agree to abide by the Safe Evolution Code of Conduct.
     

    Symposia

    First International Symposium: Latin America

    October 26, 2022

    The first SSE International Symposium was held on Wednesday, October 26, 2022 and was aimed at the Spanish-speaking community in Latin America. The talks were in Spanish with simultaneous Spanish-English translation.

    This symposium was organized in collaboration with the Sociedad Chilena de Evolución (SOCEVOL), Asociación Colombiana de Biología Evolutiva (COLEVOL), Sociedad Argentina de Biología Evolutiva (SABE), Red Mexicana de Biología Evolutiva (ReMBE) and Club Eco-Evo Latinoamérica.

    See the full list of speakers and talks here.

     


    Second International Symposium: South Asia

    August 2, 2023

    The second SSE International Symposium was held on Wednesday, August 2, 2023 and was aimed at the South Asia community. The talks were in English. This symposium was organized in collaboration with the Indian Society of Evolutionary Biologists (ISEB). 

    See the full list of speakers and talks here.


    Third International Symposium: for Mandarin Speakers in East and Southeast Asia

    November 11, 2023

    See the full list of speakers and talks here.


    View full page

    Text: Society for the Study of Evolution, Indian Society of Evolutionary Biologists, International Symposium for South Asia, 2 August 2023 via Zoom, Register for free by 31 July. Logos for the Indian Society of Evolutionary Biologists and the Society for the Study of Evolution.

    ABOUT | SPEAKERS | SCHEDULE | WORKSHOP| REGISTER

    To celebrate the diversity of the international membership and strengthen ties with the global community of evolutionary biologists, the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) is hosting a free virtual series of international symposia in different languages and time zones.

    The first SSE International Symposium was held in October 2022 and was aimed at the Spanish-speaking community in Latin America. The talks were in Spanish with simultaneous Spanish-English translation and they can be viewed here.

    The second SSE International Symposium is for the South Asian community of evolutionary biologists and will be held on August 2, 2023 via Zoom. This symposium is organized in collaboration with the Indian Society of Evolutionary Biologists (ISEB). The symposium will be followed by a workshop on August 3 on how to publish in Evolution.

    Registration for the symposium and workshop is free. Please sign up by Monday, July 31 to reserve your spot. 

    Speakers

    Speakers were selected through an open call and comprise six early career researchers (ECRs) and two senior researchers working in a diversity of disciplines.

    Headshot of Vivek Keshri. Vivek Keshri (He/Him, ;@DrVivekKeshri) is an Assistant Professor at India's REVA University in Bengaluru. His research centers around the study of beta-lactamases, particularly their identification and functional evolution.
    Headshot of Aritra Biswas. Aritra Biswas (He/Him, ;@AritraB24401348) is a PhD candidate at the Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science. He studies the historical biogeography and macroevolution of tarantulas. Broadly, he is interested in the processes that generate and maintain biological diversity over large timescales at both global and local levels.
     
    Headshot of Mariam Mohammad Hashim. Mariam Mohammad Hashim (She/Her) is a Research Associate at Lahore Medical Research Center LLP. Her primary focus and expertise lie in conducting research using in-vitro and in-vivo modeling techniques.
    Headshot of Pratibha Sanjenbam. Pratibha Sanjenbam (She/Her, ;@PSanjenbam) is a postdoc at the National Centre for Biological Sciences. Her work aims to understand the key ecological and evolutionary processes which govern the interaction of beneficial microbes with their host plants.
    Headshot of Sudipta Tung. Sudipta Tung (He/Him, ;@sudiptatung) is a DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance Early Career Fellow at the Ashoka University, India. He studies the interplay between environmental factors and genotypic variations in shaping diverse phenotypic outcomes and population abundance.
    Headshot of Ruchishree Konhar. Ruchishree Konhar (She/Her, ;@ruchishreek) is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology in New Delhi. She studies the evolutionary patterns of nuclear and organelle genomes of diverse organisms.
    Headshot of Eapsa Berry. Eapsa Berry (She/Her, ;@berryeapsa) is a postdoc at Delhi University. She applies phylogenetic methods, plant morphological principles, and carries out ecological studies to deal with emerging evolutionary questions.
    Headshot of Riddhiman Dhar. Riddhiman Dhar (He/Him, ;@DharRiddhiman) is an Assistant Professor at the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur. He studies the influence of genetic diversity and non-genetic heterogeneity on genotype-phenotype mapping.
     

     

    Program

    Talks will cover a diversity of study groups, research questions, and methodological approaches. Attendees will be able to ask questions to the speakers and the talks will be spaced by multiple breaks. In the last session, attendees will be able to interact with each other to discuss the challenges and opportunities of doing evolutionary biology research in South Asia.

     Schedule of talks.

    Workshop on publishing in Evolution

    SSE will also offer a free virtual workshop on how to publish articles in Evolution. This workshop will be held the day after the symposium, on Thursday August 3, 2023, at 10:00 am Indian time and will be taught by three Associate Editors of Evolution:

    • Kavita Jain, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research
    • Sutirth Dey, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune
    • NG Prasad, Indian Institute of  Science Education and Research Mohali

     In the first part of the workshop, participants will have the opportunity to discuss questions about how the journal's editorial process works. In the second part, participants will review a sample manuscript guided by the editors to identify the elements that contribute to the editorial success of a manuscript in Evolution.

    This workshop is also an opportunity to discuss at length whether there are mismatches between the type of research that Evolution seeks to publish and the type of research that the evolutionary biology community in South Asia is pursuing, and how common ground can be found. 
     
     

    Code of conduct

    Registration for the symposium and workshop is considered an agreement to abide by Safe Evolution’s code of conduct. SSE is committed to creating an environment where everyone can participate without experiencing harassment, discrimination, or similar unwelcome, exclusionary behavior.  All meeting participants must treat others with respect and consideration. 

     

    Registration

    Registration for the symposium and workshop will be open until Monday, July 31, 2023 any time zone. To register, please fill out the following form: https://forms.gle/VPVVof1UKK5aUo7v7

    Participants will receive an email in the days prior to the symposium and workshop with Zoom links.

    Register button.


    View full page

    Speakers | Schedule | Panel on Publishing in Evolution | Code of Conduct | Registration

    报告人 | 学术报告日程 | Evolution论文发表专家交流会 | 行为准则 | 注册

    報告人 | 學術報告日程 | Evolution論文發表專家交流會 | 行為準則 | 註冊

    About

    To celebrate the diversity of the international membership and strengthen ties with the global community of evolutionary biologists, the Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) is hosting a free virtual series of international symposia in different languages and time zones.

    The first two SSE International Symposia were aimed at the Spanish-speaking community in Latin America and the evolutionary biology community in South Asia, respectively.

    The third SSE International Symposium is for the Mandarin-speaking community of evolutionary biologists in East and Southeast Asia and will be held on November 11, 2023 via Zoom. Talks of this event will be in Mandarin with simultaneous translation to English. The symposium will be followed by a panel on November 13 on how to publish in Evolution.

    Registration for the symposium and panel is free. Please sign up by Friday, November 10 to reserve your spot.


    为了庆祝其国际成员的多样性并加强与全球进化生物学家社区的交流,SSE 正在组织一系列国际性研讨会。国际研讨会系列由为期一天的线上活动组成,提供免费注册,以不同的语言在当地时区举行

    SSE国际系列研讨会的首次活动于 2022 年 10 月举行,主要面向讲西班牙语的拉丁美洲学术界。第二次活动于 2023 年 8 月举行,面向南亚学术界。

    第三次活动将于 2023 年 11 月 11 日在Zoom线上举行,对象为东亚和东南亚讲中文的学者。本次研讨会的报告将以中文进行,并有英语同声传译。与会者可以用两种语言参加会议。

    本次研讨会和专家交流会都是免费参与。请于11 月 10 日星期五之前注册以保留席位。

     

    為了慶祝其國際成員的多樣性並加強與全球演化生物學家社群的交流,SSE 正在組織一系列國際研討會。國際研討會系列由為期一天的線上活動組成,提供免費註冊,以不同的語言在當地時區舉行。

    SSE國際系列研討會的首次活動於 2022 年 10 月舉行,主要針對講西班牙語的拉丁美洲學術界。第二次活動於 2023 年 8 月舉行,針對南亞學術界。

    第三次活動將於 2023 年 11 月 11 日在Zoom線上舉行,對象為東亞和東南亞講中文的學者。本次研討會的報告將以中文進行,並有英語同聲傳譯。與會者可以用兩種語言參加會議。

    本次研討會和專家交流會都是免費參加。請於11 月 10 日星期五之前註冊以保留席位。

     
     
     

    Speakers (报告人)  (報告人) 

    Speakers were selected through an open call and comprise six early career researchers (ECRs) and two senior researchers working in a diversity of disciplines.

    报告人是通过公开征集选出的,由来自不同研究领域的六名事业早期阶段的学者 (ECR) 和两名相对资深的学者组成。

    報告人是透過公開徵集選出的,由來自不同研究領域的六名事業早期階段的學者 (ECR) 和兩名相對資深的學者組成。

     

    Headshot of Kai Wei.Kai Wei (He/Him) is an Associate Professor at Xinjiang University, where he studies the genomics of adaptation of wild plant populations under arid and semi-arid environments.

    魏凯博士是新疆大学生命科学与技术学院副教授。他的主要研究方向是进化基因组学,以及干旱半干旱环境下野生植物种群的适应。

    魏凱博士是新疆大學生命科學與技術學院副教授。他的主要研究方向是演化基因組學,以及幹旱半幹旱環境下野生植物種群的適應性。
     
     

    Headshot of Qi Liu.Qi Liu (She/Her) is a postdoc at Fudan University, where she studies the adaptive evolutionary mechanisms of human complex traits.

    刘琪是复旦大学人类表型组研究院的博士后。她的研究方向是人类复杂性状的适应性进化机制研究。

    劉琪是復旦大學人類表型組研究院的博士後。她的研究方向是人類複雜性狀的適應性演化機制研究。
     
     
     
     
     

    Headshot of Yun Hsiao.Yun Hsiao (He/Him, ;@YHsiaoBeetle) is a postdoc at the National Taiwan University, where he works on the systematics of beetles.

    萧昀博士(;@YHsiaoBeetle)目前为国立台湾大学生态学与进化生物学研究所博士后研究员,萧博士是一名甲虫系统分类学家,他刚从澳洲国立大学和CSIRO澳洲国立昆虫馆完成博士学位,研究题目为澳洲苏铁传粉象甲之系统分类和进化。

    蕭昀博士(;@YHsiaoBeetle)目前為國立臺灣大學生態學與演化生物學研究所博士後研究員,蕭博士是一名甲蟲系統分類學家,他剛從澳洲國立大學和CSIRO澳洲國立昆蟲館完成博士學位,研究題目為澳洲蘇鐵授粉象鼻蟲之系統分類和演化。
     
     
     

    Headshot of Shengnan Zhang.Shengnan Zhang (She/Her) is a lecturer at Anhui Agricultural University, where she studies the biogeography of stag beetles and the factors that limit species niches and ranges.

    张胜男,安徽农业大学讲师。她的主要兴趣是锹甲的生物地理学和确定限制物种生态位和范围的因素。

    張勝男,安徽農業大學講師。她的主要興趣是鍬甲的生物地理學和確定限制物種生態位和範圍的因素。
     
     
     

    Headshot of Xin Dang.Xin Dang (He/Him, ;@XinDang4) is a postdoc at the University of Hong Kong, where he works on the long-term and transgenerational impact of ocean acidification on shellfish physiology, immunology, and adaptive plasticity.

    党欣,香港大学博士后,主要研究方向为长时程和跨世代海洋酸化对贝类(如牡蛎)生理,免疫和适应可塑性的影响。

    黨欣,香港大學博士後,主要研究方向為長時程和跨世代海洋酸化對貝類(如牡蠣)生理,免疫和適應可塑性的影響。


     
     

    Headshot of Huang Xianting.Xianting Huang (She/Her, ;@Tina61569249999) is a PhD student at the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, where she studies the single-cell transcriptome of spider embryos.

    黄藓婷;@Tina61569249999),目前是中国科学院动物研究所在读博士生,研究方向为蜘蛛胚胎单细胞转录组学、蜘蛛丝腺发育调控机制等。

    黃蘚婷;@Tina61569249999),目前是中國科學院動物研究所在讀博士生,研究方向為蜘蛛胚胎單細胞轉錄體學、蜘蛛絲腺發育調控機制等。
     
     

    Headshot of Bing Yang.Bing Yang (He/Him, ;@BingYangHeart) is a PhD student at China Agricultural University, where he studies the evolutionary and developmental patterns of honeybees using multi-omics techniques.

    杨炳;@BingYangHeart)是中国农业大学的在读博士生。他当前的研究方向是基于多组学技术的蜜蜂进化发育模式。

    楊炳;@BingYangHeart)是中國農業大學的在讀博士生。他當前的研究方向是基於多組學技術的蜜蜂演化發育模式。
     
     
     

    Headshot of Shu-Miaw Chaw.Shu-Miaw Chaw (She/Her) is a Distinguished Research Fellow at the Biodiversity Research Center of Academia Sinica, where she studies the comparative phylogenomics of seed plants inferred from plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear genomes.

    赵淑妙是台湾中央研究院生物多样性研究中心的杰出研究员。她的研究是从质粒、线粒体和核基因组推論种子植物的比较系统发育组学。

    趙淑妙是台灣中央研究院生物多樣性研究中心的特聘研究員。她的研究是從質體、粒線體和核基因體推論種子植物的比較系統親緣關係。


     
     
     

    Symposium Program (学术报告日程)  (學術報告日程)

    Talks will cover a diversity of study groups, research questions, and methodological approaches and attendees will be able to ask questions to the speakers in either Mandarin or English. In the last session, attendees will be able to interact with each other to discuss the challenges and opportunities of doing evolutionary biology research in East and Southeast Asia.

    学术报告内容将覆盖多种研究对象、研究问题和研究方法,与会者可以用中文或英语向演讲者提问。在最后一个环节中,与会者将能够自由互动,讨论在东亚和东南亚进行进化生物学研究的挑战和机遇。

    學術報告內容將涵蓋多種研究對象、研究問題和研究方法,與會者可以用中文或英語向演講者提問。在最後一個環節中,與會者將能夠自由互動,討論在東亞和東南亞進行演化生物學研究的挑戰和機會。


     

     

    Panel on publishing in Evolution (Evolution论文发表专家交流会) (Evolution論文發表專家交流會)

    SSE will also offer a free virtual panel on how to publish articles in Evolution. This panel will be held on Monday November 13, 2023 at 10:00 am China Standard Time. Participants will have the opportunity to discuss questions about how the journal's editorial process works with two Associate Editors of Evolution and one editor of the Evolution English Language Support Program (EELS):

    • Jen-Pan Huang, Academia Sinica
    • Suhua Shi, Sun Yat-sen University
    • Sishuo Wang, Chinese University of Hong Kong

    SSE 还将提供一个免费的专家交流会,介绍如何在 Evolution 中发表学术论文。该交流会将于中国标准时间11 月 13 日星期一10:00 举行。参与者将有机会与 Evolution 的两名副主编和 Evolution 英语语言支持计划 (EELS) 的编辑讨论有关期刊编辑流程如何运作的问题:

    • 黄仁磐,中央研究院
    • 施苏华,中山大学
    • 王思硕,香港中文大学

    SSE 也將提供一個免費的專家交流會,介紹如何在 Evolution 中發表學術論文。該交流會將於中國標準時間11 月 13 日星期一10:00 舉行。參與者將有機會與 Evolution 的兩位副主編和 Evolution 英語語言支援計劃 (EELS) 的編輯討論有關期刊編輯流程如何運作的問題:

    • 黃仁磐,中央研究院
    • 施蘇華,中山大學
    • 王思碩,香港中文大學

     
     

    Code of conduct (行为准则) (行為準則)

    Registration for the symposium and workshop is considered an agreement to abide by Safe Evolution’s code of conduct. SSE is committed to creating an environment where everyone can participate without experiencing harassment, discrimination, or similar unwelcome, exclusionary behavior.  All meeting participants must treat others with respect and consideration. 

    注册参加本研讨会和专家交流会被视为同意遵守 Safe Evolution 的相关条例准则。 SSE 致力于创造一个人人都可以参与,不包含骚扰、歧视或类似的不受欢迎、排斥行为的环境。所有与会者必须尊重他人。

    報名參加本研討會和專家交流會被視為同意遵守 Safe Evolution 的相關法規準則。 SSE 致力於創造一個人人都可以參與,不包含騷擾、歧視或類似的不受歡迎、排斥行為的環境。所有與會者必須尊重他人。

     

    Registration (注册) (註冊)

    Registration for the symposium and workshop will be open until Friday, November 12, 2023 any time zone. To register, please fill out the following form: https://forms.gle/Gs15evxf26tXYHJHA 

    If you are unable to access the Google form above, please register via Qualtrics here.

    Participants will receive an email in the days prior to the symposium and workshop with Zoom links.

    研讨会和专家交流会的注册将开放至 2023 年 11 月 12 日星期五(任何时区)。如需注册,请填写以下表格:https://forms.gle/Gs15evxf26tXYHJHA

    如果您无法访问上面的Google链接,请在此处通过Qualtrics注册

    与会者将在研讨会和专家交流会开始前几天收到一封包含 Zoom 链接的电子邮件。

    研討會和專家交流會的註冊將開放至 2023 年 11 月 12 日星期五(任何時區)。如需註冊,請填寫以下表格:https://forms.gle/Gs15evxf26tXYHJHA

    如果您無法訪問上面的Google鏈接,請在此處透過Qualtrics註冊

    與會者將在研討會和專家交流會開始前幾天收到一封包含 Zoom 連結的電子郵件。

    Organizers 

    These events are organized by SSE Graduate Student Advisory Committee, with the support from SSE International Committee and Diversity Committee

    SSE is also very grateful with the scholars based in East and Southeast Asia who have supported the organization of these events:

    • Shuhua Xu, Fudan University
    • Qi Zhou, Zhejiang University
    • Jen-Pan Huang, Academia Sinica
    • Suhua Shi, Sun Yat-sen University
    • Huateng Huang, Shaanxi Normal University
    • Kai Jiang, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden
    • Juan Diego Gaitán-Espitia, University of Hong Kong
    • Sishuo Wang, Chinese University of Hong Kong

    本次活动是由SSE研究生顾问委员会组织,并由SSE国际委员会多元化委员会提供支持。

    SSE还非常感谢以下来自东亚和东南亚的学者对本次活动的大力支持:

    • 徐书华,复旦大学
    • 周琦,浙江大学
    • 黄仁磐,中央研究院
    • 施苏华,中山大学
    • 黄华腾,陕西师范大学
    • 蒋凯,上海辰山植物园
    • Juan Diego Gaitán-Espitia,香港大学
    • 王思硕,香港中文大学

    本次活動由SSE研究生顧問委員會組織,並由SSE國際委員會多元化委員會提供支援。

    SSE還非常感謝以下來自東亞和東南亞的學者對本次活動的大力支持:

    • 徐書華,復旦大學
    • 周琦,浙江大學
    • 黃仁磐,中央研究院
    • 施蘇華,中山大學
    • 黃華騰,陝西師範大學
    • 蔣凱,上海辰山植物園
    • Juan Diego Gaitán-Espitia,香港大學
    • 王思碩,香港中文大學

    View full page

    Text: Society for the Study of Evolution GREG Seminar Series. A virtual seminar series featuring recipients of the Graduate Research Excellence Grants. Mondays at Noon Eastern.

    SSE is pleased to announce the second round of the weekly virtual seminar series featuring recipients of our Graduate Research Excellence Grants (GREG). 

    Recipients of the 2022 GREG R.C. Lewontin Early Awards will present their research every Monday from 12:00 - 1:00 pm Eastern time, starting March 4 through May 13. Each talk will be 45 minutes, followed by 15 minutes for questions. 

    Schedule:

    March 4: Robin Waterman
    “Investigations of adaptation to agriculture in horseweed”
    Advisor: Jeffrey Conner, Michigan State University

    March 11: Matheus Januario Lopes de Sousa
    “Can we bridge micro- and macroevolution? Insights from vertebrate comparative demography”
    Advisor: Daniel Rabosky, University of Michigan

    March 18: Aidan Harrington
    “The origins and establishment of polyploidy and consequences for geographic range”
    Advisor: David Moeller, University of Minnesota

    March 25: Danae Diaz
    "Investigating the effects of metal contaminants on the reliability of Eastern bluebird signaling"
    Advisor: Stephen Nowicki, Duke University

    April 1: Danai Kontou
    "Tales from the deep: tracking the evolution of aquatic food webs in a changing world"
    Advisor: Andrew Tanentzap, University of Cambridge
     
    April 8: Sebastian Mortimer
    "Dimensions of Wild Strawberry Diversity: Polyploidy and Sex Chromosomes"
    Advisor: Aaron Liston, Oregon State University
     
    April 15: Fabian Salgado Roa
    "What is causing the presence of multiple color variants in spiders?"
    Advisor: Iliana Medina, University of Melbourne

    April 22: Sergio Serrato-Arroyo
    "Elucidate the role of drug dose on competitive suppression and release of resistant parasites in the in vitro P falciparum model system"
    Advisor: Silvie Huijben, Arizona State University

    April 29: Austin Chipps
    "Speciation in a Shrew Radiation from Southeast Asia"
    Advisor: Jake Esselstyn, Louisiana State University

    May 6: Josh Knecht
    "Identifying Candidate Hybrid Incompatibilities in Naturally Occurring Hybrid Zones"
    Advisor: James Sobel, Binghamton University

    May 13: Verónica Reyes-Galindo
    "Ozone tolerance mediated by epigenetic variability in Abies religiosa from a peri-urban forest"
    Advisor: Alicia Mastretta-Yanes, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México


    The seminar will be presented via Zoom: Click here to join

    This series is organized by the Graduate Student Advisory Committee (GSAC) and hosted by GSAC and SSE Council. 

    We look forward to hearing about the outstanding research of these student award winners! Watch previous seminars on YouTube.


    View full page
    Back to top